Thursday, January 08, 2026

Top 15 US Billionaires Gained Nearly $1 Trillion in Wealth in Trump’s First Year

The US has 935 billionaires, roughly a dozen of whom have jobs within the Trump administration.

By Sharon Zhang , 
January 7, 2026

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference with Elon Musk (L) in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on May 30, 2025.ALLISON ROBBERT / AFP via Getty Images

Anew analysis finds that the richest 15 billionaires in the U.S. saw their wealth skyrocket by nearly $1 trillion in the first year of President Donald Trump’s second term, which also contained one of the single largest cuts to welfare benefits in U.S. history.

The Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) report, citing data from Forbes, has found that U.S. billionaires’ assets surged by a whopping 21 percent in 2025.

The 935 billionaires in the U.S. now control $8.1 trillion in wealth, the analysis found — nearly double the amount of wealth held by the bottom 50 percent of Americans, which comprises over 170 million people. Roughly a dozen of these billionaires work in the Trump administration.

The very richest billionaires saw the biggest gains. The top 15 richest people in the U.S. gained 33 percent in wealth last year, with their wealth skyrocketing from $2.4 trillion to $3.2 trillion — a gain of roughly $800 billion, IPS found.

A significant portion of this gain was driven by the wealth accumulation of one person: Elon Musk, the richest man on earth. In 2025, Musk’s wealth rose from $421 billion to $726 billion, a gain of $305 billion.

With this amount of money, Musk could singlehandedly pay for Republicans’ newly enacted cuts to Medicare for the next decade, estimated to cost $536 billion. He could fund health benefits for tens of millions of Americans and still be left with nearly $200 billion to spare.

IPS points out that Musk’s net worth has increased by 2,800 percent since 2020, when he was valued at just under $25 billion.

Other billionaires and billionaire families saw gains of tens of billions of dollars last year, including Google cofounder Larry Page, Oracle cofounder Larry Ellison, and the Walton family.

“The affordability crisis is hitting ordinary Americans particularly hard as we head into the new year, but not everyone is feeling the pain: billionaires are raking in staggering profits off the backs of ordinary workers,” said Chuck Collins, who directs IPS’s Program on Inequality and the Common Good.

Regular Americans are indeed struggling. At the end of 2025, polls were already finding that an affordability crisis was spreading across the U.S., with roughly 30 percent of Americans saying they skipped medical care in the past year due to cost, according to surveys by Politico and GQR for The Century Foundation.

This is slated to become far worse as Republicans’ cuts to Medicaid and Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies kick in this year. Last week, on New Year’s Day, Affordable Care Act subsidies for tens of millions of Americans expired overnight, causing premiums to double on average as a result of cuts to the Republican budget bill. Meanwhile, the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that 16 million people will lose their health care benefits altogether due to the Medicaid and ACA cuts.

These cuts were enacted to pay for a massive tax cut for billionaires and the rest of the top richest Americans. The CBO estimated that the richest Americans would see a gain of $12,000 each year as a result of the bill, while the poorest 10 percent would see their wealth decrease by $1,600 yearly on average.

“It’s not just that U.S. billionaires are entering 2026 with record-breaking increases in extreme wealth: it’s that they are also paying far less in taxes compared to the huge amount of wealth they amass. Average taxpayers like you and I pay income tax at triple the rate of the wealthiest Americans,” said Omar Ocampo, inequality researcher for IPS, in a statement. “Not only are a small number of Americans holding more wealth than the rest of America, but they’re also not paying their fair share in taxes.”

Jensen Huang, World’s 8th Richest Man, ‘Perfectly Fine’ With California Billionaire Tax


If the proposed tax is enacted, Huang would face a roughly $8 billion tax bill—a tiny fraction of his $165 billion net worth.


Nvidia founder and CEO Jensen Huang speaks during an event in Las Vegas, Nevada, on January 6, 2026.
(Photo by Patrick T. Fallon / AFP via Getty Images)

Jake Johnson
Jan 07, 2026
COMMON DREAMS


Jensen Huang, CEO of the tech behemoth Nvidia and the eighth-richest man in the world, said Tuesday that he is “perfectly fine” with a grassroots push in California to impose a one-time wealth tax on the state’s billionaire residents.

In an interview with Bloomberg, Huang said that “we chose to live in Silicon Valley, and whatever taxes, I guess, they would like to apply, so be it”—a nonchalant response that diverges from the hysteria expressed by other members of his class in response to the proposed ballot initiative.

“It never crossed my mind once,” Huang said of the tax proposal.

If the proposed 5% levy on billionaire wealth makes it onto the November ballot and California voters approve it, Huang would face an estimated $8 billion tax bill—a tiny slice of his $165 billion net worth. Those subject to the tax would have the option of paying the full amount owed all at once or over a period of five years.

“'Who cares’ is absolutely the appropriate reaction,” said Matt Bruenig, founder of the People’s Policy Project, a left-wing think tank. “It means nothing to him. David Sacks types look like the biggest babies in the world.”

Bruenig was referring to the White House cryptocurrency czar who left California for Texas at the end of 2025 in an apparent effort to avoid the possible billionaire tax, which would apply to anyone living in California as of January 1, 2026.

“As a response to socialism, Miami will replace NYC as the finance capital and Austin will replace SF as the tech capital,” Sacks declared in a social media post last week.

“Frontline caregivers are glad to hear that, much like the overwhelming majority of billionaires, Mr. Huang will not be uprooting his life or business to make an ideological point over a 1% per year fix to a problem that Congress created.”

The proposed one-time tax on California’s roughly 200 billionaires would raise an estimated $100 billion in revenue, funds that would be set aside for the state’s healthcare system, food assistance, and education.

Organizers are pursuing the tax in direct response to unprecedented Medicaid cuts enacted by US President Donald Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress over the summer.

Suzanne Jimenez, chief of staff of Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West and the lead sponsor of the ballot initiative, welcomed Huang’s response to the proposed tax in a statement late Tuesday.

“We agree with Jensen Huang that California has a tremendous talent pool of workers uniquely qualified to continue moving many industries forward, including within the tech sector and beyond,” said Jimenez. “This initiative will ensure the $100 billion healthcare funding crisis created by [the Trump-GOP legislation] in July is fixed, so that all of those workers can access emergency rooms and vital healthcare in California.”

“Frontline caregivers are glad to hear that, much like the overwhelming majority of billionaires, Mr. Huang will not be uprooting his life or business to make an ideological point over a 1% per year fix to a problem that Congress created last July—and that California will unite to solve this November,” Jimenez added.
AMERIKAN GESTAPO
Mayor to ICE After Fatal Shooting: ‘Get the Fuck Out of Minneapolis!’

“Somebody is dead,” said Mayor Jacob Frey. “That’s on you. And it’s also on you to leave.”



Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey speaks during a press conference following reports that the Trump administration will be targeting Somali immigrants in the Twin Cities in Minnesota on December 2, 2025.
(Photo by Leila Navidi/The Minnesota Star Tribune via Getty Images)

Jessica Corbett
Jan 07, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey had a message for US Immigration and Customs Enforcement after a federal agent fatally shot a woman in his city on Wednesday: “To ICE, get the fuck out of Minneapolis!”

“We do not want you here,” the Democratic mayor said at a press conference. “Your stated reason for being in this city is to create some kind of safety, and you are doing exactly the opposite. People are being hurt. Families are being ripped apart.”

“Long-term Minneapolis residents that have contributed so greatly to our city, to our culture, to our economy, are being terrorized and now, somebody is dead,” Frey continued. “That’s on you. And it’s also on you to leave.”




The woman killed has not been identified, but US Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) said she was a US citizen. The senator also joined Frey and other elected officials, including Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), in calling on ICE to leave Minnesota’s largest city.

The US Department of Homeland Security announced Tuesday that “the largest DHS operation ever is happening right now in Minnesota,” with 2,000 federal agents expected in the Twin Cities amid a fraud scandal involving some Somali residents.

Since President Donald Trump returned to office last year after campaigning on a promise of mass deportations, he has also sent large groups of immigration agents to other major Democrat-led cities, including Los Angeles and Chicago. In September, a federal agent fatally shot Silverio Villegas-Gonzalez, a Mexican immigrant, while he was in a vehicle just outside the Illinois city.

As with the shooting in Minneapolis, video footage of the killing in Illinois undermined DHS claims. The department said Wednesday that the woman in Minnesota tried “to run over our law enforcement officers in an attempt to kill them—an act of domestic terrorism.”

One witness told Minnesota Public Radio that she saw a federal agent confronting the woman, who “was trying to turn around, and the ICE agent was in front of her car, and he pulled out a gun and put it right in—like, his midriff was on her bumper—and he reached across the hood of the car and shot her in the face like three, four times.”

Frey also challenged the DHS narrative on Wednesday: “What they are doing is not to provide safety in America. What they are doing is causing chaos and distrust. They’re ripping families apart. They’re sowing chaos on our streets. And in this case, quite literally killing people.”

“They are already trying to spin this as an action of self-defense. Having seen the video... myself, I want to tell everybody directly, that is bullshit,” Frey added. “This was an agent recklessly using power that resulted in somebody dying—getting killed.”


Minneapolis woman killed by federal agents was a widow with a 6-year-old son


Members of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) gather at the scene where a driver was shot by a U.S. immigration agent, according to local and federal officials, in Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S., January 7, 2026. REUTERS/Tim Evans
January 07, 2026
ALTERNET

The Minnesota Star Tribune reports the woman shot in the face and killed by a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent in Minneapolis, Minnesota on Wednesday was a widow with a young son.

“[Renee Nicole] Good had previously been married to Timmy Ray Macklin Jr., who died in 2023 at the age of 37,” reports the Star Tribune. “Macklin’s father, Timmy Ray Macklin Sr., was shocked to hear the news that Good had been shot and killed.”

“There’s nobody else in his life,” said Macklin Sr. “I’ll drive. I’ll fly. To come and get my grandchild.”

Good’s mother, Donna Ganger, said the family was notified of the death late Wednesday morning.

“That’s so stupid” that she was killed, Ganger told reporters. “She was probably terrified.”

Department of Homeland Security head Kristi Noem called Good a domestic terrorist and accused her of being one of several “rioters” blocking ICE agents with her car and allegedly trying to run them over.

Ganger said her daughter is “not part of anything like that at all,” referring to the people protesting ICE in Minneapolis.

“Renee was one of the kindest people I’ve ever known,” said Ganger. “She was extremely compassionate. She’s taken care of people all her life. She was loving, forgiving and affectionate. She was an amazing human being.”

Walz Puts National Guard—and Trump—On Notice as Protests Erupt Over ICE ‘Murder’ in Minneapolis

“We’ve been warning for weeks that the Trump administration’s dangerous, sensationalized operations are a threat to our public safety and that someone was going to get hurt.”



A US Border Patrol agent sprays pepper spray into the face of a protestor following the deadly shooting by Immigration and Customs Enforcement of 37-year-old Renee Good in Minneapolis on January 7, 2026.
(Photo by Alex Kormann/The Minnesota Star Tribune via Getty Images)

Brett Wilkins
Jan 07, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz on Wednesday put his state’s National Guard on standby—and the Trump administration on notice—after a federal immigration officer fatally shot a woman in Minneapolis.

Walz, a Democrat who was former Vice President Kamala Harris’ running mate in the 2024 election, said during a press conference that he issued a warning order to the Minnesota National Guard, which means troops are preparing for a possible mobilization.




Woman Killed by ICE Identified as Protesters Take to Streets in Minneapolis and Beyond



‘Execution Plain and Simple’: Community Fury in Minneapolis After Deadly Shooting by Federal Agent

This, after a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer shot and killed a woman later identified by her mother as Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old US citizen and mother of a 6-year-old whose father died in 2023.

Good was killed Wednesday morning while driving a sport utility vehicle in south Minneapolis during heightened ICE operations in the Twin Cities. The US Department of Homeland Security and DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said Good was shot in self-defense while committing “an act of domestic terrorism.”

President Donald Trump said on his Truth Social network that Good “was very disorderly, obstructing and resisting, who then violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE officer, who seems to have shot her in self defense.”

However, bystander video shows Good slowly trying to pull away from federal agents before several gunshots are heard and the SUV crashes. Law enforcement authorities and witnesses said Good was shot in the face and head.

“It’s beyond me that the Homeland Security director already decided who this person was and what their motive was—before they were even removed from the vehicle,” Walz said during a press conference, referring to Noem. “We’re not living in a normal world.”



ICE agents also reportedly prevented a physician bystander from attending to the victim.

Turning to the Trump administration and its deadly anti-immigrant crackdown, Walz said, “We’ve been warning for weeks that the Trump administration’s dangerous, sensationalized operations are a threat to our public safety and that someone was going to get hurt.”

“What we’re seeing is the consequence of governance designed to generate fear, headlines, and conflict. It’s governing by reality TV,” he continued. “And today that recklessness cost someone their life.”

“From here on, I have a very simple message: We do not need any further help from the federal government,” Walz added. “To Donald Trump and Kristi Noem: You’ve done enough.”

Walz’s comments echoed the frustration of other elected officials in Minnesota, including Democratic Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, who had a blunt message for ICE following Wednesday’s shooting: “Get the fuck out of Minneapolis!”

Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.)—a member of her state’s large Somali American community, which is enduring racist attacks by Trump and his supporters—called Wednesday’s shooting “unconscionable and reprehensible” and accused the administration of “unleashing violence” and “terrorizing neighborhoods.”


At least hundreds of people took to the streets of Minneapolis to protest Wednesday’s killing, gathering at the site of the shooting and at other locations including the Hennepin County Courthouse to demand ICE leave their city. Some protesters hurled snowballs and insults at federal agents.

“Shame! Shame! Shame!” protesters at the scene of the killing chanted loudly from behind police tape. “ICE out of Minnesota!”

“ICE out Now!” they shouted at the courthouse doors.




Additional emergency protests are planned for cities across the nation.

“Today, ICE murdered a woman in Minneapolis. Tonight, we’ll be mourning her and the other lives that have been taken and traumatized by ICE,” progressive Illinois congressional candidate Kat Abughazaleh said on Bluesky. “I hope to see you there.”

ICE agent fatally shoots woman, 37, in Minneapolis as immigration crackdown sparks outrage


A US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer shot and killed a woman during a traffic stop in Minneapolis, triggering protests and a furious backlash from city and state leaders who condemned the federal immigration crackdown as reckless and destabilising.


Issued on: 07/01/2026 
By: FRANCE 24

Law enforcement officers stand guard during a standoff with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and federal officers in the Little Village neighbourhood of Chicago. © Jim Vondruska, Reuters
01:56




An Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer shot and killed a Minneapolis driver on Wednesday during the Trump administration’s latest immigration crackdown on a major American city – a shooting that federal officials said was an act of self-defence but that the mayor described as reckless and unnecessary.

The 37-year-old woman was shot in front of a family member during a traffic stop in a snowy residential neighbourhood south of downtown Minneapolis, just a few blocks from some of the city’s oldest immigrant markets and about a mile (1.6 kilometres) from where George Floyd was killed by police in 2020. Her death quickly drew a crowd of hundreds of angry protesters.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, speaking while visiting Texas, described the incident as an “act of domestic terrorism” carried out against ICE officers by a woman who “attempted to run them over and rammed them with her vehicle”.

“An officer of ours acted quickly and defensively, shot, to protect himself and the people around him,” Noem said.

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey blasted that characterisation as “garbage” and criticised the federal deployment of more than 2,000 officers to the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St Paul as part of the immigration crackdown.

“What they are doing is not to provide safety in America. What they are doing is causing chaos and distrust,” Frey said, calling on immigration agents to leave. “They’re ripping families apart. They’re sowing chaos on our streets, and in this case, quite literally killing people.”

Trump ramps up hard-line rhetoric against immigrants from 'sh*thole' countries

“They are already trying to spin this as an action of self-defence. Having seen the video myself, I wanna tell everybody directly, that is bullshit,” the mayor added.


Videos taken by bystanders from different vantage points and posted to social media show an officer approaching an SUV stopped across the middle of the road, demanding the driver open the door and grabbing the handle. The Honda Pilot begins to pull forward and a different ICE officer standing in front of the vehicle pulls his weapon and immediately fires at least two shots into the vehicle at close range, jumping back as the SUV moves towards him.

It was not clear from the videos whether the vehicle made contact with the officer. The SUV then sped into two cars parked at the kerb nearby before crashing to a stop. Witnesses screamed obscenities, expressing shock at what they had seen.

After the shooting, emergency medical technicians attempted to administer aid to the woman.


© France 24
05:54


The killing marked a dramatic escalation in a series of immigration enforcement operations in major cities under the Trump administration. The death of the Minneapolis driver, whose name was not immediately released, was at least the fifth linked to immigration crackdowns.

The Twin Cities have been on edge since the Department of Homeland Security announced on Tuesday that it had launched the operation, which is at least partly tied to allegations of fraud involving Somali residents. Noem confirmed on Wednesday that DHS had deployed more than 2,000 officers to the area and said they had already made “hundreds and hundreds” of arrests.

A large throng of protesters gathered at the scene after the shooting, venting their anger at local and federal officers, including Gregory Bovino, a senior US Customs and Border Patrol official who has been the public face of crackdowns in Los Angeles, Chicago and elsewhere.

In scenes reminiscent of those crackdowns, bystanders heckled officers, chanting “Shame! Shame! Shame!” and “ICE out of Minnesota”, and blowing whistles that have become ubiquitous during the operations.

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz said he was prepared to deploy the National Guard if necessary. He said a family member of the driver witnessed the killing, which he described as “predictable” and “avoidable”. While expressing outrage, Walz urged protesters to remain peaceful.

“They want a show. We can’t give it to them. We cannot,” the governor said at a news conference. “If you protest and express your First Amendment rights, please do so peacefully, as you always do.”

Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara briefly described the shooting to reporters but, unlike federal officials, gave no indication that the driver was attempting to harm anyone. He said she had been shot in the head.

“This woman was in her vehicle and was blocking the roadway on Portland Avenue,” O’Hara said. “At some point a federal law enforcement officer approached her on foot and the vehicle began to drive off. At least two shots were fired. The vehicle then crashed on the side of the roadway.”

There were calls on social media to prosecute the officer who fired the shots. Bob Jacobson, commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, said state authorities would investigate the shooting alongside federal officials.

“Keep in mind that this is an investigation that is also in its infancy,” Jacobson said. “Any speculation about what has happened would be just that.”

The shooting occurred in the district of Democratic Representative Ilhan Omar, who described it as “state violence”, not law enforcement.

For nearly a year, migrant rights advocates and neighbourhood activists across the Twin Cities have been preparing to mobilise in the event of an immigration enforcement surge. From houses of worship to mobile home parks, they have built extensive online networks, scanned licence plates for suspected federal vehicles, and stocked whistles and other noisemaking devices to alert communities to any enforcement presence.

(FRANCE 24 with AP)

'Gonna upset a lot of people': CNN in awe as Noem 'inflames' Minnesotans with new remarks

Robert Davis
January 7, 2026
RAW STORY


U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem attends a House Homeland Security hearing entitled "Worldwide Threats to the Homeland," on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S. December 11, 2025. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz

CNN anchor Jake Tapper was in awe at Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's comments following a deadly shooting in Minneapolis on Wednesday involving an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent.

An ICE agent fatally shot a 37-year-old woman named Renee Nicole Good, a U.S. citizen, at the scene of an immigration raid as Good tried to drive away. The shooting sparked significant outrage, with Republicans quick to call the incident an example of "left-wing terrorism." Thousands of people attended a vigil for Good on Wednesday night.

During a press conference after the shooting, Noem said Good was "obstructing law enforcement" and had "weaponized her vehicle" against the ICE officer.

Noem's assertions appear to contradict videos of the event that were taken by bystanders, according to analysts.

Tapper discussed Noem's comments on Wednesday's broadcast of "The Lead."

"I am sure that Secretary Noem, sticking with the version, her narrative of what happened on that street that she shared earlier this day, that she's maintaining that that's what happened, is going to upset a lot of people who saw with their own eyes what happened," Tapper said.

CNN law enforcement correspondent Whitney Wild agreed with Tapper and said critics including Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz "do not believe" the DHS "narrative."

Wild said angry people in the city started "screaming" when she described the DHS statement.

"They were offended by this DHS narrative that this was a justified shooting. They are incredibly angry. Secretary Noem's words I'm sure will do very little to calm tensions. They may even inflame them," she said.

Good's shooting catalyzed a large protest in South Minneapolis near the scene of her death.


'A woman died!' Minnesota senator slams Trump's lack of 'human decency' in profane rant


Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) on January 7, 2026

January 07, 2026 
ALTERNET

U.S. Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) recently expressed frustration at the Wednesday shooting of a Minneapolis widow and mother by ICE agents.

Faced with the street-side murder of Renee Nicole Good, who was shot in the face and killed by a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent, Smith delivered a disgusted response to President Donald Trump’s insistence on putting his hands on the state of Minnesota.

“I wish they would just leave us the f—— alone,” Smith told reporters. “I mean, seriously ... When do things stop being about politics and start being about actual human decency?"

Mere hours after agents killed Good, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem — fresh from an appearance in which she wore tactical law enforcement gear — was publicly sliming Good as a “domestic terrorist” and trying to claim Good threatened the lives of ICE agents while appearing to flee in her vehicle.

Trump, meanwhile, posted on Truth Social that “The woman screaming was, obviously, a professional agitator, and the woman driving the car was very disorderly, obstructing and resisting, who then violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer, who seems to have shot her in self defense.”

Smith, however, just wanted Trump to remove himself and his administration from Minnesota.

“We can hypothesize on what their political reasons are but meanwhile a woman died being shot in her car and everything they’re doing is making it worse,” Smith said.

Watch the video of Smith's remarks below:



‘Sick, Malicious Lie’: Trump Caught Pushing ‘Alternate Reality’ Version of Minneapolis ICE Shooting

“The right-wing bullshit machine is operating at full steam and across all cylinders today,” said one critic.



Brad Reed
Jan 07, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

President Donald Trump on Wednesday posted an account of the deadly shooting in Minneapolis by a federal immigration officer that was completely at odds with all evidence seen so far.

In a post on Truth Social, the president claimed that the woman killed in her car by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer “violently, willfully, and viciously ran over” him, forcing him to fire his weapon at her in self-defense.



Trump further claimed that it “is hard to believe” that the ICE officer “is alive” after being supposedly run over.

Eyewitness videos taken at the scene of the incident, however, do not show the officer getting run over at all. In fact, the officer can be seen walking around after discharging his weapon, with no signs of any injury.

In fact, the video Trump posted on his Truth Social that he claims shows the officer being run over does not at all show the officer being run over, but rather stepping safely out of the way as the car starts moving forward.

The New Republic‘s Greg Sargent carefully examined the video posted by Trump and concluded that it “demonstrates nothing close to what” the president claimed it showed.


“This is a sick, malicious lie from Trump,” Sargent commented.

Reporter Sam Stein of the Bulwark also provided a swift debunking of Trump’s claims.

“Hard to believe the ICE officer is still alive, writes the president,” Stein wrote on X, “of an ICE officer who was not hit at all and was well enough to go run down the street to check on the woman he had killed.”

John Hopkins University economist Filipe Campante was struck by just how little effort the president feels he needs to exert to make his lies convincing.

“That he chooses the ‘me or your lying eyes?’ approach, in the full knowledge that there are multiple videos out there, is a striking commentary on the nature of propaganda in the modern information environment,” Campante wrote on Bluesky. “Censorship is no longer viable, so the approach is to use your own content provision to drown out any negative facts/evidence.”

Tour guide and author Ben Edwards marveled at the president’s ability to make completely fact-free assertions.

“The country is slowly starting to come apart,” Edwards observed. “Trump lives in an alternate reality. He cannot speak a word of truth.”

Disinformation researcher Kate Starbird warned that Trump’s low-effort propaganda was still likely to prove effective with his followers.

“The right-wing bullshit machine is operating at full steam and across all cylinders today,” Starbird wrote, “strategically framing the horrific ICE killing of a Minnesota woman to defend/bolster their political aims. For example, Trump’s message... will shape how his supporters (willfully mis)interpret the video evidence.”




















ICE Is a Domestic Terror Threat

The agents who shot Renee Nicole Good shot her because they knew they could; they shot her because the Trump administration has specifically and purposely empowered law enforcement to act without impunity or care.



Demonstrators hold candles during an emergency vigil organized by the Ward 40+ Community Response Team at Winnemac Park in Chicago, Illinois, United States, on January 7, 2026 to mourn a rapid responder reportedly killed by an ICE agent earlier the same day in Minneapolis and to protest Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations.
(Photo by Jacek Boczarski/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Jordan Liz
Jan 08, 2026
Common Dreams

On January 7, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent murdered Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis. Immediately, the Trump administration sprang into action to propagandize the incident. Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin claimed that the woman “weaponized her vehicle, attempting to run over our law enforcement officers in an attempt to kill them.” Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem claimed, “It was an act of domestic terrorism.”

President Donald Trump posted via Truth Social:
The woman screaming was, obviously, a professional agitator, and the woman driving the car was very disorderly, obstructing and resisting, who then violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer, who seems to have shot her in self-defense. Based on the attached clip, it is hard to believe he is alive, but is now recovering in the hospital. The situation is being studied, in its entirety, but the reason these incidents are happening is because the Radical Left is threatening, assaulting, and targeting our Law Enforcement Officers and ICE Agents on a daily basis. They are just trying to do the job of MAKING AMERICA SAFE. We need to stand by and protect our Law Enforcement Officers from this Radical Left Movement of Violence and Hate!

This is a national tragedy. A young woman, a US citizen acting as a “legal observer” of federal agents, is now dead. A completely avoidable death if only ICE officers could exercise any level of restraint. If only the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) wasn’t actively invading Minneapolis and indiscriminately targeting its residents—citizens and immigrants alike. If only the Trump administration gave a singular fuck about America.

Even after shooting Good, ICE agents refused to allow a doctor who was at the scene to provide aid. When an ambulance arrived 15 minutes later, they were blocked by ICE vehicles. They harassed her, shot her, and if there was even the faintest possibility that she might have lived, they took that away from her too.

In moments like this, we must remember that in democracies like the US there are four systems of checks and balances: In addition to the executive, judicial, and the legislative, there is the people.

The Trump administration is trying desperately to politicize her murder to further attack their political enemies. They kill an innocent woman and then use her death to villainize the people protesting her killer.

There is ample video evidence showing that Good was driving away slowly. None of the agents—who, to be clear, had no right to harass or intimidate her in the first place—were even remotely in danger. They simply shot her because they knew they could. They shot her because the Trump administration has specifically and purposely empowered law enforcement to act without impunity or care.

Don’t forget, President Trump has explicitly told law enforcement: “Please don’t be too nice. Like when you guys put somebody in the car, and you’re protecting their head, you know, the way you put your hand over. I said, ‘You can take the hand away, OK?” For Trump, it doesn’t make a difference whether the person has been convicted or is merely suspected. He chooses and promotes violence at every turn.

What’s particularly alarming here is how, despite the abundance of video evidence and eye-witness testimonies, the Trump administration insists on lying. This is literal fascism. To quote George Orwell’s famous 1984, “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”

And it’s not just the Trump administration. Conservative commentators are also amplifying this obvious falsehood. Megyn Kelly lies, “This cop almost got run over by this woman, who accelerated into him.” Matt Walsh blames the “protestor” and the “Democrats who’ve been fomenting chaos and violence against ICE for months.” Elon Musk, whose Twitter-X is the social media propaganda wing of the Trump administration, backs the ICE agent: “Attempting to murder them with a car requires self-defense.”

Even in this instance, where the evidence against their propaganda is staggering; where the murdered person was a white US citizen; and where telling the truth would have been advantageous for them, they lie. If the Trump administration was even remotely competent, they could have used this moment to hold this one ICE agent accountable for his crimes and avoid the protest that their lies are provoking. They could have exploited Good’s death to feign the appearance of being a legitimate, rule-based government. But they couldn’t even do that. Driven solely by arrogance, narcissism, and unmitigated contempt for anyone they consider part of the “enemy within,” they can never accept fault.

The Trump administration has given up any pretext of being a democracy bound to the Constitution. They demonstrated this when they kidnapped President Nicolás Maduro and imposed colonial rule on Venezuela. And they demonstrated it Wednesday domestically against its own citizens. They will lie at every moment. They will resort to violence at every moment. They will kill you if you show any level of resistance.

In this moment, we cannot allow ourselves to be scared into submission. Elected officials, Americans, immigrants, anyone who cares about democracy, all of us need to stand up against this threat.

But the steps we take have to be productive. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, for instance, is correct to call out DHS’s “propaganda machine.” However, sending in the National Guard immediately after an armed federal agent kills an innocent woman will work to silence and suppress protest. Insisting that “they’re there to protect you and protect your constitutional rights” doesn’t change this dynamic. Walz is not meeting the moment.

Part of what people are protesting here isn’t simply this one act of state terrorism. They are protesting the entire monopolization of force by those who were elected to protect the people. They are protesting indiscriminate violence by militarized law enforcement. They are protesting ICE’s domestic terrorism.

This protest is not only righteous, but morality and justice demand it. In moments like this, we must remember that in democracies like the US there are four systems of checks and balances: In addition to the executive, judicial, and the legislative, there is the people. We are the ultimate check against state-sanctioned terrorism. We must be that today.


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.


Jordan Liz
Jordan Liz is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at San José State University. He specializes in issues of race, immigration and the politics of belonging.
Full Bio >



Progressives Rip ‘Spineless’ Dem Leaders for ‘Empty’ Response to Trump’s Venezuela Attack

“If you cannot oppose this regime change war for oil, you don’t have the moral clarity or guts to lead our party or nation,” said one progressive congressman.



US House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) makes a statement alongside then-Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) outside the White House in Washington, DC on January 17, 2024.
(Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)

Brett Wilkins
Jan 07, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

As Donald Trump blows by Barack Obama’s record for most countries bombed by a US president, progressive observers are fuming over Democratic leadership’s inaction in response to the abduction of Venezuela’s president and other illegal acts of war.

Congressional Democrats’ reaction to Trump’s brazen bombing and invasion of Venezuela and kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro—who faces dubious narco-terrorism charges in the US—ranged from open praise by members of the party’s conservative wing like Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) and Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), to fierce condemnation by Congressional Progressive Caucus Deputy Chair Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and other anti-war leftists including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).



Progressives Urge Passage of Bills to Stop Trump From Launching ‘Forever War’ in Venezuela


However, numerous observers have noted that, as Chris Lehmann wrote Tuesday for the Nation, senior Democrats including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, both of New York, “are doing what they do best on Venezuela: Nothing.”

Trump “staged an illegal coup,” Lehmann argued. “Chuck Schumer’s response? Empty words and meaningless parliamentary maneuvers.”



Schumer did co-sponsor a war powers resolution aimed at blocking Trump from using military force in or against Venezuela. However, like every other resolution ever introduced in a bid to force presidential compliance with the 1973 War Powers Act, it failed to muster enough votes to pass. Trump has now ordered attacks on 10 countries, compared with seven bombed under Obama and at least six under his predecessor, George W. Bush.

“The central complaint from Democratic leaders has been that the Trump White House didn’t properly consult Congress in advance of its crime spree. And even that grievance rings hollow,” Lehmann said. “Thus far, Democrats have shown no inclination to pursue an impeachment resolution against the president—the clear constitutional remedy for such abuses—even as a growing chorus of lawmakers are calling for it, together with leaders of the party’s activist base.”

“Sadly,” he continued, “the party’s inert approach to illegitimate acts of war well predates Trump’s Venezuela rampage; leading Democrats sat on their hands while their own president backed a genocidal war in Gaza—a lockstep posture of complicity so deeply ingrained that the Democratic National Committee refused to let any Palestinian speaker take the stage at the party’s 2024 convention.”

“Democrats likewise enthusiastically hailed Barack Obama’s raid in Pakistan to kidnap and execute Osama bin Laden with little thought that it would serve as a precedent for later imperial errands like Maduro’s ouster,” Lehmann added.

Truthdig contributor Conor Lynch on Monday noted the stark contrast between the Democratic Party’s left wing and its leadership in response to Trump’s aggression, highlighting a warning from Graham Platner, a military veteran and progressive US Senate candidate from Maine, about politicians “on both sides of the aisle trying to convince us all that somehow this was justified.”

Lynch wrote that “more than two decades and countless deaths later, the party that led the US into disastrous quagmires in the Middle East is intent on leading the country into yet another war.”

While there are more anti-war Democratic voices in Congress than there have been since the Vietnam War era, many senior Democrats in both chambers have a history of approving wars. Every current Democratic lawmaker who was in office in 2001 voted to authorize the so-called War on Terror, while Schumer, Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), and several House Democrats still in office assented the following year to the disastrous invasion and occupation of Iraq.



“Most Democrats supported the invasion of Iraq,” Lynch continued. “This was partly due to the initial public support for the war and the George W. Bush administration’s fabricated intelligence about [former Iraqi President] Saddam Hussein’s ‘weapons of mass destruction’ (much like the Trump administration’s fabricated claims about the Venezuelan government’s support for ‘narco-terrorism’).”

“Today there is no excuse for Democrats to stand by as another Republican president—this one historically unpopular—launches an illegal invasion in our own backyard,” Lynch asserted. “Indeed, it is not only morally correct but politically smart to oppose the illegal attack on Venezuela, as there is little appetite for another regime change crusade among the American public.”

“If there was ever a time for Democrats to grow a spine, it’s now,” Lynch added. He pointed to Rep. Ro Khanna’s (Calif.) declaration on Saturday that “if you cannot oppose this regime change war for oil, you don’t have the moral clarity or guts to lead our party or nation.’”

Progressive Democrats of America (PDA) issued a similar call Sunday, urging members of Congress “to reject the shameful bipartisan complicity in this campaign of escalating aggression, and to replace it with a sound, sensible foreign policy grounded in diplomacy, human rights, and the self‑determination of all people, including the Venezuelan people.”

“This is not foreign policy,” PDA said of Trump’s aggression. “This is militarized authoritarianism. We must act to stop it now, before it spreads to inflame the entire region, if not the entire globe in a dangerous, unnecessary conflict. We are outraged, but this moment demands more than outrage. It demands organized, coordinated resistance.”
Major US Newspapers Just Love a Good Illegal Military Intervention

With his kidnapping of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, President Donald Trump proved he is no less an imperialist than his predecessors, and that’s precisely why many of the nation’s leading editorial pages are hailing Maduro’s capture.


Nicolas Maduro is seen in handcuffs after landing at a Manhattan helipad, escorted by heavily armed Federal agents as they make their way into an armored car en route to a Federal courthouse in Manhattan on January 5, 2026 in New York City.
(Photo by XNY/Star Max/GC Images)

Ari Paul
Jan 06, 2026
FAIR

“History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes,” Mark Twain allegedly quipped. On January 3, 1990, Panamanian Commander Manuel Noriega surrendered to US forces, who carried him off to face drug charges. Thirty-six years to the day later, US forces swooped into Venezuela, abducting President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, following decades of hostility between the oil-rich socialist country and the United States. The pretext offered: Maduro had to be taken to the US to face drug charges.

The coincidence is a reminder that the US has a long history of both covert and military intervention in Latin America: President Donald Trump, as extreme as he might be, isn’t an outlier among American presidents in this regard. And despite the right’s attempt to paint Trump as some sort of peacenik (Compact, 4/7/23; X, 10/14/25), he is no less an imperialist than his predecessors.

And that’s precisely why many of the nation’s leading editorial pages are hailing Maduro’s capture.
‘Hemispheric Hygiene’

The Wall Street Journal editorial board (1/3/26) called the abductions “an act of hemispheric hygiene,” a dehumanizing comparison of Venezuela’s leaders to germs needing to be cleansed.

For the Journal, the abductions were justified because they weren’t just a blow to Venezuela, but to the rest of America’s official enemies. “The dictator was also part of the axis of US adversaries that includes Russia, China, Cuba, and Iran,” it said. It called Maduro’s “capture… a demonstration of Mr. Trump’s declaration to keep America’s enemies from spreading chaos in the Western Hemisphere.” It amplified Trump’s own rhetoric of adding on to the Roosevelt Corollary, saying “It’s the ‘Trump Corollary’ to the Monroe Doctrine”—a nod to the long-standing imperial notion that the US more or less owns the Western Hemisphere.

The next day, the Journal editorial board (1/4/26) even seemed upset that the Trump administration didn’t go far enough in Venezuela, worrying that it left the socialist regime in place, whose “new leaders rely so much on aid from Cuba, Russia, China, and Iran.” “Despite Mr. Trump’s vow that the US will ‘run the country,’ there is no one on the ground to do so,” the paper complained, thus reducing “the US ability to persuade the regime.”

You’re writing from the country that has spent the past four months blowing up small craft in the Caribbean, and you think it’s Maduro who has “destabilized the Western Hemisphere”?

The Washington Post board (1/3/26) took a similar view to the Journal. “This is a major victory for American interests,” it wrote. “Just hours before, supportive Chinese officials held a chummy meeting with Maduro, who had also been propped up by Russia, Cuba, and Iran.”

The Post, which has moved steadily to the right since Trump’s inauguration a year ago, seemed to endorse extreme “might makes right” militarism. “Maduro’s removal sends an important message to tin-pot dictators in Latin America and the world: Trump follows through,” the board wrote. (Really? Did we miss when Trump “followed through” on his promise to end the Ukraine War within 24 hours? Or to take back the Panama Canal? Or make Canada the 51st state?) It belittled Democratic President Joe Biden, who “offered sanctions relief to Venezuela, and Maduro responded to that show of weakness by stealing an election.”

Like the Journal, the Post board (1/4/26) followed up a day later to push Trump to take a more active role in Venezuela’s future. It worried about his decision to leave in place “dyed-in-the-wool Chavista” Delcy Rodriguez and other “hard-liners” in Maduro’s administration.

The Post chided Trump for dismissing the idea of installing opposition leader María Corina Machado, who it deemed a worthy partner in imperial prospects: “She has a strong record of standing for democracy and free markets, and she’s committed to doing lucrative business with the US.” As with the Journal, the assumption that it’s up to the US to choose Venezuela’s leadership went unquestioned.
‘Fueled Economic and Political Disruption’

The New York Times editorial board (1/3/26), on the other hand, condemned the abductions, saying Trump’s attack “represents a dangerous and illegal approach to America’s place in the world.”

But the board only did so after the requisite vilifying, asserting that “few people will feel any sympathy for Mr. Maduro. He is undemocratic and repressive, and has destabilized the Western Hemisphere in recent years.”

You’re writing from the country that has spent the past four months blowing up small craft in the Caribbean, and you think it’s Maduro who has “destabilized the Western Hemisphere”?

Perhaps rather than worrying that US behavior will encourage some other country to behave lawlessly, US papers could be more concerned about their own country’s lawlessness.

Even as CBS News content czar Bari Weiss spiked a “60 Minutes“ piece about the plight of Venezuelan migrants under the administration’s brutal round-ups, the Times editorial blamed Maduro alone for the humanitarian crisis at hand. ”He has fueled economic and political disruption throughout the region by instigating an exodus of nearly 8 million migrants,“ the editorial said. As is typical in US commentary on Venezuela (FAIR.org, 2/6/19), the word ”sanctions“ does not appear in the editorial, though US strictures have fueled an economic collapse three times worse than the Great Depression.

And it comes after the Times opinion page gave space calling for regime change in Venezuela. “Washington should approach dismantling the Maduro regime as we would any criminal enterprise,” wrote Jimmy Story (New York Times, 12/26/25), a former US ambassador to Venezuela. Right-wing Times columnist Bret Stephens wrote a piece simply headlined “The Case for Overthrowing Maduro” (11/17/25).

The Times didn’t mention the recent seizures of ships carrying Venezuelan oil (BBC, 12/21/25; Houston Public Media, 12/22/25)—or the issue of Venezuela’s oil at all, though even the paper’s own news section (1/3/25) admitted that oil was “central” to the kidnapping. “They stole our oil,” Trump dubiously claimed in his public address, bragging that the door to the country was now open to have “very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in, spend billions of dollars… and start making money for the country.”

These are glaring oversights by the Times board, even if it ultimately waved its finger at the administration for its military action. Contrast this to the editorial board of the Houston Chronicle (1/3/26), which serves a huge portion of the energy sector:
Even now we’re still asking: Why? Why is the US taking such drastic military action? Is it to “take back” our oil? To deport Venezuelans en masse? To fight drug trafficking? To send a message to Cuba?

Perhaps this cloud of justifications just conceals the truth—there is no real reason. Trump seems to be doing this because he can.
‘Not a Guarantee’

Elsewhere in the press, the operation against Maduro won support from editorial boards that also reserved the right to say, “I told you so.” “Maduro Had to Be Removed,” said the Dallas Morning News editorial board (1/3/26) in its headline, adding in the subhead, “But the US Cannot ‘Run’ Venezuela.”

And the Miami Herald editorial board (1/3/26), which serves a large anti-socialist Latin American population, said that while Maduro out of power was “obviously cause for enormous joy,” this was “not a guarantee for democracy.” “Is Trump’s true interest to see democracy in Venezuela,” it asked, “or to install a new leader who’s more friendly to the US and its interests in the nation’s oil reserves?”

The Chicago Tribune editorial board (1/5/25) heaped paragraphs of praise on the Maduro mission—“we don’t lament Maduro’s exit for a moment”—and scoffed at “left-wing mayors” who “howled in protest at the weekend actions.” But it saw a moral dilemma:
What moral authority does the US now have if, say, China, removes the Taiwanese leadership, deeming it incompatible with Chinese interests? Not much. And this action surely weakens the moral argument against Vladimir Putin, though Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is now hoping Russia’s leader is the next authoritarian Trump takes out.

The New York Times editorial board (12/21/89) said something similar 36 years ago, when the US invaded Panama. While justifying the invasion, it asked, “What kind of precedent does the invasion set for potential Soviet action in Eastern Europe?”

Perhaps rather than worrying that US behavior will encourage some other country to behave lawlessly, US papers could be more concerned about their own country’s lawlessness. By kidnapping a foreign head of state, the Trump administration is saying that international law doesn’t apply to the United States. That’s a sentiment most American editorialists are all too ready to applaud—despite the danger it poses for Americans, and for the world.


© 2023 Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)

Ari Paul
Ari Paul is a New York-based journalist who has reported for the Nation, the Guardian, the Forward, the Brooklyn Rail, Vice News, In These Times, Jacobin and many other outlets.
Full Bio >