Sunday, April 05, 2026

SPACE/COSMOS


From ‘bird leg syndrome’ to solar storms: Roberta Bondar breaks down Artemis II mission

By Prisha Dev 
 Global News
Posted April 4, 2026 


WATCH: Canada’s first female astronaut talks historic Artemis II lunar mission.



As the four Artemis II astronauts prepare for their historic flyby of the moon on Monday, Roberta Bondar, Canada’s first female astronaut, says this mission signals a leap in developments for future space travel.

Speaking with Global News, Bondar said the mission will push humans farther into deep space than they have travelled in decades, exposing the crew to conditions not experienced since the Apollo era.

The mission, known as Artemis II, will send four astronauts around the moon before returning to Earth on April 10, 2026.

The crew, made up of three Americans and one Canadian, will travel a total of more than 400,000 kilometres from Earth — farther than any human has travelled before — and then loop behind the moon and return home.

“People liken this to Apollo 8, but they were much closer,” she said. “This flyby will be about 4,000 miles out (from the moon), so they’ll be exposed to the background radiation of space and subjected to any solar wind or solar storms.”

Bondar said that distance will give the astronauts a rare vantage point, both scientifically and visually.

“They are really out there in deep space, where we haven’t been before,” she said. “They are going to be looking at the dark moon differently and take pictures of the sun in ways we have not been able to see because human beings have not been there.”

The crew has recently passed a new milestone of being closer to the moon than to Earth in their deep space journey.

“The Earth is quite small and the moon is definitely getting bigger,” pilot Victor Glover said from space.

Beyond the visuals, the mission is also a test of how the human body responds to space flight over longer distances.

“They look pretty good actually,” Bondar said of the crew. “They do have these smartwatches on now that will be looking at aspects of their physiology, their sleep cycle and some of the stresses they will face.”

That data will help researchers better understand how to prepare astronauts for future missions deeper into space.

Bondar also pointed to well-documented physical changes astronauts experience in orbit, including what is often referred to as “bird leg syndrome.”

“Your body gets rid of about two litres of blood volume through the kidneys,” she said. “In space, you don’t need as much, whereas on Earth you need about five litres because gravity pulls blood into your legs.”

She said Artemis II is part of a broader effort to refine how humans and technology work together in space.

“They’re trying to look at ways of making these kinds of missions not just smarter, but safer.”

“These early flights are all about trying to understand the technology,” she added. “These are really early days and about learning to make things smarter for the next flight, and the next flight.”

The Artemis II crew is expected to splash down in the Pacific Ocean following its lunar flyby, marking a key milestone in NASA’s plan to return humans to the moon and eventually travel to Mars.

Live updates can be followed on NASA’s official website, including a stream of the Orion’s journey through space.

– With files from The Canadian Press


Artemis astronauts catch first human glimpse of Moon’s 'Grand Canyon'

Crew peers at the massive Orientale basin during historic lunar flyby, seeing regions of the Moon never viewed by human eyes.

In this photo by NASA on Saturday, April 4, 2026, Commander Reid Wiseman gazes at Earth from Orion spacecraft Integrity during the Artemis II mission. / AP


The Artemis astronauts have taken in sights of the Moon never before seen by human eyes, crew members reported as their spacecraft crossed the two-thirds mark on their journey to a long-anticipated lunar flyby.

As the astronauts went to bed in the early hours of Sunday, closing out the fourth day of their 10-day mission, they were nearly 200,000 miles (321,869 kilometres) from Earth and 82,000 miles from the Moon, according to NASA's online dashboard.

The US space agency published on Sunday an image taken by the Artemis crew, showing a distant Moon with the Orientale basin visible.




"This mission marks the first time the entire basin has been seen with human eyes," NASA said. The massive crater, which resembles a bullseye, had been photographed before by orbiting cameras.

Speaking to Canadian children live from space, astronaut Christina Koch said the crew was most excited to see the basin, sometimes known as the Moon's "Grand Canyon."

"It's very distinctive and no human eyes previously had seen this crater until today, really, when we were privileged enough to see it," Koch said during the question-and-answer session hosted by the Canadian Space Agency.




NASA astronaut Christina Koch is illuminated by a screen inside the darkened Orion spacecraft on the third day of the agency's Artemis II mission. /Reuters

The next major milestone is expected overnight Sunday into Monday, at which point the astronauts will enter the "lunar sphere of influence," where the Moon's gravity will have stronger pull on the spacecraft than Earth's.

If all proceeds smoothly, as the Orion spacecraft whips around the Moon the astronauts, Americans Koch, Reid Wiseman and Victor Glover along with Canadian Jeremy Hansen, could set a record by venturing farther from Earth than any human before.

Flyby plans reviewed


NASA said the Artemis crew has completed a manual piloting demonstration and reviewed their lunar flyby plan, including reviewing the surface features they must analyse and photograph during their time circling the Moon.

Earlier, the astronauts kicked off their day with a meal that included scrambled eggs and coffee, NASA said, and had woken up to the tune of Chappell Roan's pop smash "Pink Pony Club."

"Morale is high on board," commander Reid Wiseman told Houston's Mission Control center as the space crew's work day began.


RelatedTRT World - Artemis II crew crosses midpoint to Moon, captures stunning Earth views


The father of two girls was in high spirits in part because he had the chance to speak with his daughters from space.

"We're up here, we're so far away, and for a moment, I was reunited with my little family," he told a live press conference. "It was just the greatest moment of my entire life."


It's a feat Wiseman has dubbed "Herculean" and which humanity has not accomplished in more than half-a-century.

The astronauts have had geology training in order to be able to photograph and describe lunar features, including ancient lava flows and impact craters.

They'll see the Moon from a unique vantage point compared with the Apollo missions of the 1960s and 70s.

Apollo flights flew some 70 miles above the lunar surface, but the Artemis 2 crew will be just over 4,000 miles at their closest approach, which will allow them to see the complete, circular surface of the Moon, including regions near both poles.

Never before seen

The Artemis 2 astronauts have already seen brand-new perspectives.

"Last night, we did have our first view of the moon far side, and it was just absolutely spectacular," Koch, the mission specialist, said during a live interview from space.

John Honeycutt, manager of NASA's Space Launch System programme, shared at a briefing Saturday a new image transmitted by the astronauts.



‘It just makes me feel like a little kid’


"On the far left, you can see features of the Moon that have never been seen by human eyes until yesterday," Honeycutt said, explaining that only robotic imagers had previously "seen" that region.

The Artemis 2 crew has been busy taking photographs including with smartphones, devices NASA recently approved to take aboard spaceflights.

The space agency had previously released images from Orion that included a full portrait of Earth, featuring its deep blue oceans and billowing clouds.

The Artemis 2 mission is part of a longer-term plan to repeatedly return to the Moon, with the goal of establishing a permanent lunar base that will offer a platform for further exploration.

It's a highly anticipated journey that demands exacting precision, but there's still room for the astronauts to live out their childhood dreams of spaceflight.

"It just makes me feel like a little kid," said Hansen recently, describing the joy of floating.


Artemis II astronauts will study the Moon's surface using mainly their eyes


Despite the technological advancements since the Apollo mission, the astronauts aboard the Orion spacecraft will use the most basic instrument to study the surface of the Moon – their eyes. During the lunar flyby, which will last for several hours, the crew will study certain lunar sites and phenomena as part of 10 objectives chosen by NASA.


Issued on: 05/04/2026 - 
By: FRANCE 24

An image of Earth taken by NASA's Artemis II astronaut commander Reid Wiseman inside the Orion capsule on April 3, 2026. © AP

More than 50 years after humans first flew around the Moon, Artemis astronauts will repeat the feat on Monday and use the most basic instrument to study it: their eyes.

Despite the technological advancements since the Apollo missions, NASA still relies on the eyesight of its astronauts to learn more about the Moon.

"The human eye is basically the best camera that could ever or will ever exist," Kelsey Young, the lead scientist for the Artemis 2 mission, told AFP.

"The number of receptors in the human eye far outweighs what a camera is able to do."

Although modern cameras may be superior to human eyesight in some respects, "the human eye is really good at color, and it's really good at context, and it's also really good at photometric observations," Young said.

Humans can understand how lighting changes surface details, like how angled lighting reveals texture but reduces visible color.

In just the blink of an eye, humans can detect a subtle color shift and understand how lighting changes the contours of a landscape like the Moon's surface, details which are scientifically useful but difficult to ascertain from photos or videos.

Artemis 2 astronaut Victor Glover, who pilots the Orion spacecraft, said before liftoff this week that eyes were a "magical instrument."
Field scientists

To ensure they made the most of their proximity to the Moon, the four Artemis 2 crew members underwent more than two years of training.

Young said the goal was to turn the astronauts into "field scientists" via a combination of classroom lessons, geological expeditions to Iceland and Canada, and multiple simulated flybys of the Moon, just like the mission they are on.

The three American astronauts -- commander Reid Wiseman, pilot Glover and mission specialist Christina Koch – along with Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen, all had to memorize the Moon's "Big 15," or the 15 features of the Moon that will allow them to orient themselves.

Using an inflatable Moon globe, they practiced seeing how the angle of the sun changed the colors and textures of the lunar surface, honing their observation and note-taking skills for the big moment.

"I can tell you, they are excited and they are ready," Young said with a smile.
'About the size of a basketball'

The Artemis astronauts' mission is to study certain lunar sites and phenomena as part of 10 objectives chosen by NASA and ranked in priority order based on scientific interest.

During the Moon flyby, which will last for several hours, the crew will have to observe the celestial body with their naked eyes, along with cameras they have on board.

Noah Petro, head of NASA's planetary geology lab, told AFP that the Moon will look to the astronauts "about the size of a basketball held at arm's length."

"The question I'm most interested in is, are they going to be able to see color on the lunar surface," Petro said.

"I don't mean rainbow colors, but you know, dark browns or tan colors because that tells us something about the composition, and that tells us something about the history of the Moon."

David Kring of the Lunar and Planetary Institute told AFP he is not expecting any earth-shattering discoveries because of the multiple lunar probes and high-resolution images of the Moon taken since the Apollo missions.

Nevertheless, "having astronauts describing what they're seeing... That is an occurrence that at least two generations of people on Earth have never heard before," he said.

The Artemis 2 flyby will be broadcast live by NASA, save for a period for when the spacecraft is behind the moon.

"Just listening to their practice descriptions in the mission simulations... It brings chills up my arms," Young said.

"I am absolutely confident that these four people are going to deliver some incredible descriptions."

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)


Artemis II astronauts will study the Moon's surface using mainly their eyes


Despite the technological advancements since the Apollo mission, the astronauts aboard the Orion spacecraft will use the most basic instrument to study the surface of the Moon – their eyes. During the lunar flyby, which will last for several hours, the crew will study certain lunar sites and phenomena as part of 10 objectives chosen by NASA.


Issued on: 05/04/2026 - 
By: FRANCE 24

An image of Earth taken by NASA's Artemis II astronaut commander Reid Wiseman inside the Orion capsule on April 3, 2026. © AP

More than 50 years after humans first flew around the Moon, Artemis astronauts will repeat the feat on Monday and use the most basic instrument to study it: their eyes.

Despite the technological advancements since the Apollo missions, NASA still relies on the eyesight of its astronauts to learn more about the Moon.

"The human eye is basically the best camera that could ever or will ever exist," Kelsey Young, the lead scientist for the Artemis 2 mission, told AFP.

"The number of receptors in the human eye far outweighs what a camera is able to do."

Although modern cameras may be superior to human eyesight in some respects, "the human eye is really good at color, and it's really good at context, and it's also really good at photometric observations," Young said.

Humans can understand how lighting changes surface details, like how angled lighting reveals texture but reduces visible color.

In just the blink of an eye, humans can detect a subtle color shift and understand how lighting changes the contours of a landscape like the Moon's surface, details which are scientifically useful but difficult to ascertain from photos or videos.

Artemis 2 astronaut Victor Glover, who pilots the Orion spacecraft, said before liftoff this week that eyes were a "magical instrument."
Field scientists

To ensure they made the most of their proximity to the Moon, the four Artemis 2 crew members underwent more than two years of training.

Young said the goal was to turn the astronauts into "field scientists" via a combination of classroom lessons, geological expeditions to Iceland and Canada, and multiple simulated flybys of the Moon, just like the mission they are on.

The three American astronauts -- commander Reid Wiseman, pilot Glover and mission specialist Christina Koch – along with Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen, all had to memorize the Moon's "Big 15," or the 15 features of the Moon that will allow them to orient themselves.

Using an inflatable Moon globe, they practiced seeing how the angle of the sun changed the colors and textures of the lunar surface, honing their observation and note-taking skills for the big moment.

"I can tell you, they are excited and they are ready," Young said with a smile.
'About the size of a basketball'

The Artemis astronauts' mission is to study certain lunar sites and phenomena as part of 10 objectives chosen by NASA and ranked in priority order based on scientific interest.

During the Moon flyby, which will last for several hours, the crew will have to observe the celestial body with their naked eyes, along with cameras they have on board.

Noah Petro, head of NASA's planetary geology lab, told AFP that the Moon will look to the astronauts "about the size of a basketball held at arm's length."

"The question I'm most interested in is, are they going to be able to see color on the lunar surface," Petro said.

"I don't mean rainbow colors, but you know, dark browns or tan colors because that tells us something about the composition, and that tells us something about the history of the Moon."

David Kring of the Lunar and Planetary Institute told AFP he is not expecting any earth-shattering discoveries because of the multiple lunar probes and high-resolution images of the Moon taken since the Apollo missions.

Nevertheless, "having astronauts describing what they're seeing... That is an occurrence that at least two generations of people on Earth have never heard before," he said.

The Artemis 2 flyby will be broadcast live by NASA, save for a period for when the spacecraft is behind the moon.

"Just listening to their practice descriptions in the mission simulations... It brings chills up my arms," Young said.

"I am absolutely confident that these four people are going to deliver some incredible descriptions."

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)

The significance of the space mission that's making history

April 4, 2026
NPR
Heard on All Things Considered

By Rob Schmitz
Linah Mohammad
Tinbete Ermyas


Former NASA chief of staff Bale Dalton talks about the work that went into the Artemis mission plan and what to watch for on the journey.



ROB SCHMITZ, HOST:

The Artemis II's Orion capsule is on its way to the moon. Its crew will travel more than 250,000 miles from Earth, the farthest humans have ever traveled into space. To talk more about this historic mission and what it means, we've called Bale Dalton. He's the former NASA chief of staff and has worked on the Artemis program. Welcome, Mr. Dalton.



BALE DALTON: Hi, Rob. Thanks so much for having me.



SCHMITZ: So this week, we witnessed NASA send a crew to the moon for the first time in more than 50 years. What was going through your mind during the liftoff?



DALTON: Well, it's obviously a incredible joy as a central Floridian to have so many people - hundreds of thousands of people - visit Central Florida for this incredible launch. You know, what's going through my mind at any time is, you know, my friends - Reid, Victor, Christina and Jeremy - are, you know, taking this mission and inspiring us all in our return to deep space and around the moon after 54 years. So both a mixture of inspiration and awe that I always have watching what NASA does and, you know, some anticipation for what my friends, this crew, are going to experience on behalf of all humanity.



SCHMITZ: And let's get into that. I mean, this was a viral moment. It was livestreamed on NASA's website. And as of now, the video of launch has more than 18 million views on YouTube. Can you talk a little bit about how NASA's strategy of communicating this launch to the public has gone?



DALTON: Absolutely. I mean, well, for me, it was an incredible honor to help lead NASA, you know, helping direct the efforts of tens of thousands of engineers, scientists, researchers and, of course, astronauts throughout 14 different facilities across our nation, you know, showing the world every day what Americans can accomplish when we work together. And, you know, NASA has some real value here in showing the world what is possible when that happens.



SCHMITZ: So one big change since the end of the Apollo program is the development of successful private space exploration companies like SpaceX or Blue Origin. How has this competition that they pose changed how NASA goes about its goals?



DALTON: Well, I think the future of space exploration and, of course, the future of NASA is these public-private partnerships and fostering this not only interest in going to space and doing the hard things and exploring, but also realizing how much it can foster our industry here. So not just, you know, inspiration of folks, but also how our industry and Americans are making things. I mean, the Moon To Mars program supports alone almost 100,000 jobs, which I think...



SCHMITZ: Wow.



DALTON: ...Is incredible and certainly meaningful for us here in central Florida.



SCHMITZ: So, you know, looking beyond Artemis II, if all goes as planned, NASA plans to put people on the moon as soon as 2028 as part of the Artemis IV mission. Now, NASA administrator Jared Isaacman has plans for a moon base as well, something I've read that you also support. Now, it's worth pointing out here that China aims to put people on the moon by 2030 and also has plans for a lunar base. How important is it that the US builds a base on the moon before China does that?



DALTON: Well, I think this - you know, Moon To Mars and the Artemis campaign is, you know, an extension of what our future plans in space are going to be. And, you know, we're going back to the moon this time, first of all, to a different part of the moon - the South Pole, where we think, you know, water ice is. And we're going there to learn how to live, work, and cultivate resources like that water ice to help inform how we might do future human exploration through space. And I think the competition here is paramount. You know, we here in America have the competitive edge in our aerospace, which is, you know, visible in our space exploration. And, you know, in a time of limited resources and limited space, we need to make sure that responsible actors are the ones that are doing this exploration.



SCHMITZ: So let's go back to Artemis II. If all goes to plan, the crew should circle the moon on Monday. It's expected that they will lose communications with Earth for about 30 minutes or so. So what do you think mission control will be like during that time?



DALTON: Well, I think many folks might find themselves jealous of the Artemis crew getting, you know, between 30 and 60 minutes of solace and silence and able to just be with their thoughts as they see parts of the moon that have never been seen with human eyes before. But there in mission control, and certainly in my own mind, it will be a time of tense anticipation, of waiting to hear from them again on the other side. And - but it just goes to show the amount of effort and the amount of anticipation that's gone into this crew doing things that have never been done before - I mean, as you already said, traveling away from Earth on a total of 685,000-mile journey, being the furthest into space as any humans have ever been before.



SCHMITZ: As the former chief of staff for NASA, what are you going to be watching for as the mission continues?



DALTON: Well, there's a number of different milestones that this crew will be checking out, and a lot of those are in the weeds. As an engineer myself, I'm very interested in seeing come back and the testing of the equipment and the types of things that need to be done for our future missions to actually land on the surface of the moon. But I'm most anticipating seeing that crew and the Orion capsule named Integrity come down safely under the parachutes and the astronauts being retrieved by some of my former colleagues in the Navy flying helicopters and manning the ships that will retrieve the crew. So I'm looking forward to them safely back on earth.



SCHMITZ: That's Bale Dalton. He's the former chief of staff for NASA. Thank you.



DALTON: Thanks so much, Rob. I appreciate it.



(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)



Copyright © 2026 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts may vary. Transcript text may be revised to correct errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org may be edited after its original broadcast or publication. The authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.


‘Ancient Immigrant’ Star Puzzles, Delights Astronomers




An image of our Milky Way galaxy with the position of the Ancient Immigrant star (SDSS J0715-7334) marked with a star symbol. The solid red line shows the path the Ancient Immigrant has taken through our galaxy; the dashed blue line shows the path expected for a star born in the Large Magellanic Cloud. 
CREDIT Image Credit: Vedant Chandra and the SDSS collaboration Background ESA/Gaia image, A. Moitinho, A. F. Silva, M. Barros, C. Barata, University of Lisbon; H. Savietto, Fork Research, under a Creative Commons license CC BY‐SA 3.0 IGO.

By 

A class of undergraduate students at University of Chicago has used data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) to discover one of the oldest stars in the universe, a star that formed in a companion galaxy and migrated to the Milky Way.

The ten students found the star as part of their “Field Course in Astrophysics” course at the University of Chicago, led by Professor Alex Ji, the deputy Project Scientist for SDSS-V, and graduate teaching assistants Hillary Andales and Pierre Thibodeaux.

SDSS, an international collaboration of over 75 scientific institutions across the globe, has been operating for 25 years with a commitment to make data from its survey publicly available and broadly usable to all.  In its latest phase, it uses robots to rapidly acquire spectra of millions of objects across the sky with the aim of improving our understanding of how stars, black holes and galaxies grow and evolve over cosmic time.

In Professor Ji’s class, SDSS is embedded into the curriculum.  The students spent the first several weeks looking through data from the newest phase of the SDSS, searching for interesting stars. After examining several thousand, they made a list of 77 to further observe on a field trip to Las Campanas Observatory.

They then spent their Spring Break at Carnegie Science’s Las Campanas Observatory in Chile, using the Magellan Inamori Kyocera Echelle (MIKE) instrument on the Magellan telescopes. The night of March 21st, 2025 was their first night on the telescope. The second star they observed, named SDSSJ0715-7334, turned out to be the one that justified the trip.

“We found it the first night, and it completely changed our plans for the course,” Ji said.

The plan was to observe each star for 10 minutes, but the second night the students observed it for three hours. “I was looking at that camera the whole night to make sure it was working,” said Natalie Orrantia, one of the students who made the discovery.

The star turned out to be the most pristine ever found, composed almost completely of hydrogen and helium. This composition suggests it is one of the oldest stars ever seen. Analysis of its orbit shows it formed in the Large Magellanic Cloud and migrated into the Milky Way billions of years ago. These two facts led Alex Ji, the students’ Professor at University of Chicago, to call the star an “ancient immigrant.”

“This ancient immigrant gives us an unprecedented look at conditions in the early universe,” said Ji. “Big data projects like SDSS make it possible for students to get directly involved in these important discoveries.”

Astronomers refer to any elements heavier than hydrogen and helium as “metals,” and the amount of those elements present in a star is known as its “metallicity.” With only 0.005 percent of the metals found in our Sun, SDSSJ0715-7334 has the lowest metallicity of any star yet observed in the Universe – more than twice as metal-poor as the previous record holder.

“We analyzed the star for a large swath of elements, and the abundances are quite low for all of them,” said Ha Do, another of the students who discovered the star.

What does it mean for a star to have low metallicity? Because elements heavier than hydrogen and helium can only be produced in supernova explosions, stars with few of these elements must have formed from gas before most of the supernovae in the Universe ever occurred. In other words, the star must be ancient, from the first few generations of stars that ever formed.

The team also used data from the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission to find the distance to the star and its motion through our galaxy. By tracing its motion back through the billions of years the star has existed, the team identified the birthplace of the star: in the Milky Way’s largest companion galaxy, the Large Magellanic Cloud.

The Ancient Immigrant contained further surprises for the students who discovered it. Ji divided the class into groups, each focusing on a different type of analysis of the star. Orrantia and Do led the team that studied the carbon content of the star, which turned out to be so low that it was undetectable.

“The star has so little carbon that it suggests an early sprinkling of cosmic dust is responsible for making it,” said Ji. “This formation pathway has only been seen once before.”

Contributing to such a discovery so early in their careers has helped Orrantia and Do decide to continue to pursue graduate careers in astronomy.

“To be able to actually contribute to something like this, it’s very exciting,” Do said.

“These students have discovered more than just the most pristine star.” said Juna Kollmeier, the Director of SDSS-V.   “They have discovered their inalienable right to physics.  Surveys like SDSS and Gaia make that possible for students of all ages everywhere on Earth and this example shows that there is still plenty of room for discovery.”

US seeks $152M to reopen Alcatraz as high-security prison: Report


April 5, 2026 
MIDDLE EAST MEMO


An aerial view of Alcatraz Island and the City view in San Francisco, California, United States on April 4, 2026 as U.S President Trump seeks $152 million to rebuild and reopen Alcatraz Island as a secure prison. [Tayfun CoÅŸkun – Anadolu Agency]

The White House requested $152 million for a project to reopen the infamous Alcatraz prison in San Francisco Bay, California, as an operational prison, as part of a proposed budget for the 2027 fiscal year, according to Fox News on Saturday, Anadolu reports.

US President Donald Trump proposed $152 million to begin the project, part of a $1.7-billion prison system funding increase to improve pay and address staffing shortages.

The budget request includes funding to rebuild Alcatraz into a modern high-security prison, covering initial costs.

Alcatraz, closed in the 1960s due to high costs, later became a tourist site but may be rebuilt as a modern high-security prison.

Initial funding is proposed, though California politicians are skeptical over costs and feasibility.

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called the plan “absurd,” saying rebuilding Alcatraz would waste taxpayer money and insult the public’s intelligence.

The site currently generates about $60 million in revenue as a tourist attraction, according to the National Park Service.

The request will need to be approved by the US Congress.
Israeli occupiers torch Palestinian property in West Bank villages

Witnesses say occupiers opened fire, set poultry farms ablaze in southern Nablus attack

Awad Rjoob |05.04.2026 -  TRT/AA



RAMALLAH, Palestine/ISTANBUL

Israeli occupiers attacked the Palestinian towns of Qusra and Jalud in southern Nablus on Saturday in the occupied West Bank, opening fire and setting property ablaze, according to Palestinian media and witnesses.

The official Palestinian news agency Wafa said occupiers attacked Qusra, triggering confrontations with residents.

The agency said the attackers attempted to storm homes in the western part of the town before Israeli forces entered. No injuries were immediately reported.

Palestine Voice Radio later published images showing fires burning in facilities in Qusra.

The broadcaster also reported a simultaneous attack by Israeli occupiers on the outskirts of Jalud in southeastern Nablus.

Witnesses told Anadolu that occupiers opened fire during the attacks and torched poultry farms between Qusra and Jalud.

Israel has intensified operations in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, since launching a military campaign in the Gaza Strip on Oct. 8, 2023. Palestinians view the escalation, including killings, arrests, displacement and settlement expansion, as a step toward the formal annexation of the territory.

In a landmark opinion in July 2024, the International Court of Justice declared Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory illegal and called for the evacuation of all settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

*Writing by Tarek Chouiref
Over 1,400 killed in Lebanon since beginning of Israeli attacks on March 2

Health Ministry says latest 24-hour toll includes 54 dead, 156 wounded

Mohammad Sio |05.04.2026
TRT/AA



ISTANBUL

More than 1,400 people have been killed in Lebanon since Israeli attacks began on March 2, the country’s Health Ministry said Saturday, as the conflict continues to take a heavy toll on civilians.

In a statement, the ministry said the death toll has reached 1,422, with 4,294 others wounded over the same period.

It added that 54 people were killed and 156 injured in the past 24 hours alone.

Israel has carried out airstrikes and a ground offensive in southern Lebanon since a cross-border attack by the Lebanese group Hezbollah on March 2, despite a ceasefire that took effect in November 2024.

Hezbollah has fired barrages of rockets into Israel since early March, saying the attacks are in response to continued Israeli strikes on Lebanon, as well as the killing of Iran’s then-Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in a joint US-Israeli airstrike on Feb. 28.
Israeli occupation murders over 72,292 Palestinians since beginning of genocide on Gaza


QNA/Gaza
GULF NEWS
Published on April 05, 2026 

The Israeli occupation forces (IOF) murdered at least 72,292 Palestinian civilians and injured at least 172,073 others since the beginning of the genocide that the Israeli occupation has been committing against the Gaza Strip in October 2023.

The PalestiniaMinistry of Health in the Gaza Strip said in a statement on Sunday that hospitals across the Gaza Strip received four martyrs - four of whom have been pulled out from under the rubble, in addition to five injured persons.

The statement indicated that many of the victims remain under the rubble and scattered on the streets, as ambulance and civil defense crews are still unable to reach them.

Since the "ceasefire" agreement went into effect in October 2025, the IOF murdered at least 716 Palestinians, and injured at least 1,968 others, while 759 bodies were pulled out from under the rubble.

 

Report: 2.47 million Palestinian children face growing risks amid Israeli aggression

2.47 million Palestinian children face growing risks amid Israeli aggression

Occupied Jerusalem, April 5 (SANA) Around 2.47 million Palestinian children are living in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, accounting for 43 percent of the population and facing risks under Israeli occupation, according to the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics.

The figures, released in a report marking Palestinian Children’s Day and cited by the Palestinian news agency WAFA, highlight the scale of challenges facing children amid continued Israeli aggression and humanitarian strain. The report said 1.38 million children live in the West Bank and 1.09 million in Gaza.

By the end of 2025, at least 72,289 Palestinians had been killed in Gaza, including 21,283 children, representing about 30 percent of the total, according to the data.

The impact has extended beyond military operations, with 157 children reported to have died from hunger and 25 from extreme cold in displacement camps.

Around 44,486 children have been injured, accounting for roughly 26 percent of total injuries.

More than 10,500 children are reported to be suffering from severe, long-term injuries, while around 4,000 remain at risk due to limited access to healthcare.

According to United Nations data, more than 3,700 children have been hospitalized due to malnutrition. About 64 percent of children face food shortages, while over 60 percent of those aged six to 23 months suffer from acute nutritional deprivation.

Human rights groups have reported a rise in violations against Palestinian children, particularly in the West Bank.

More than 1,655 children have been detained by Israeli forces since the war on Gaza began, including around 600 in 2025 alone, according to prisoner advocacy groups.

Reports indicate that children in detention face harsh conditions and limited access to basic rights.

The conflict has also had a significant psychological impact, with more than 1.1 million children experiencing trauma.

An estimated 58,000 children in Gaza have lost one or both parents, adding to social and economic pressures.

The report highlights the long-term risks facing Palestinian children, including limited access to healthcare, education and basic services.

N.J/A.B


Opinion

No apologies – Naming Zionism for what it is


April 4, 2026 
by Ranjan Solomon


Israeli settlers, under the protection of Israeli forces, raid the Old City of Hebron in the southern West Bank on January 31, 2026. [Amer Shallodi – Anadolu Agency]

“A people that oppresses another cannot itself be free” -Friedrich Engels –


Zionism is racism. I state this plainly, not as a slogan designed to provoke, but as a conclusion drawn from history, lived reality, and the political structure that has emerged in what is now called Israel. I am not interested in diluting this claim to make it more comfortable, nor in softening its edges to invite polite debate. Some ideas demand clarity, not compromise.

Zionism presents itself as a movement for Jewish self-determination. In isolation, that principle sounds reasonable—every people should have the right to shape their political future. But no political project exists in isolation.


Zionism did not emerge in an empty land, and it did not unfold without consequence. It took root in a place where another people already lived, and its realization required their displacement, their fragmentation, and their continued subordination.

The events of 1948 are not a tragic misunderstanding or an unfortunate byproduct of state-building. They are central. Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were expelled or fled from their homes, entire villages were destroyed, and a society that had existed for generations was systematically dismantled. Palestinians remember this as the Nakba – “the catastrophe”—and that name is not rhetorical exaggeration. It is an accurate description of a foundational rupture that continues to shape every aspect of Palestinian life.

What followed was not a temporary injustice but the consolidation of a system. Land laws, citizenship structures, and state policies were crafted in ways that privileged Jewish identity while marginalizing Palestinians, whether they remained within the borders of Israel or lived under military occupation in the West Bank and Gaza. This is not incidental. It is the logical outcome of a state built to maintain a demographic and political majority for one group over others.

Supporters of Zionism often argue that it is not racism but national liberation—a response to centuries of persecution culminating in the Holocaust. That history is undeniable and horrific.

The genocide of European Jews stands as one of the greatest crimes in human history. But historical suffering does not grant moral exemption. It does not justify the dispossession of another people, nor does it transform inequality into justice.

If anything, it should deepen the commitment to universal rights, not narrow them.

To point this out is not to deny Jewish history or identity. It is to reject the idea that safety for one people must be built on the exclusion or subjugation of another. A political ideology that enshrines ethnic or religious preference into law – especially in a land shared by multiple communities—cannot be reconciled with genuine equality. When rights are distributed based on identity, discrimination is not a flaw in the system; it is the system.

This reality is visible not only in historical events but in present-day structures. Palestinians in the occupied territories live under military rule, subject to restrictions on movement, access to resources, and basic civil liberties. Within Israel itself, Palestinian citizens face systemic inequalities in areas such as land allocation, housing, and political power. The fragmentation of Palestinian identity – into citizens, residents, refugees, and those under occupation – is not accidental. It is a method of control.

Language often obscures these realities. Terms like “security,” “conflict,” and “disputed territories” create the impression of symmetry, as though two equal sides are engaged in a balanced struggle. But the lived experience tells a different story: one of power and dispossession, of a state with overwhelming military and political dominance over a stateless people. Naming that imbalance matters, because without it, injustice can be reframed as inevitability.

There are those who challenge this system from within. Voices like Miko Peled—an Israeli raised within the Zionist establishment—have come to reject the ideology precisely because they see its consequences. Their critiques are not born of ignorance or hostility but of proximity and reflection. They demonstrate that opposition to Zionism is not synonymous with hostility toward Jews; it is a political and ethical stance against a specific system of power.

Critics of this position often respond by labelling it extreme or unfair. They argue that Zionism has multiple interpretations, that it can be reformed, or that it simply expresses the desire of a people to live in safety. But the question is not what Zionism claims to be in theory. The question is what it has produced in practice. And in practice, it has created and maintained a reality in which one group’s rights and freedoms are structurally elevated above another’s.

If we apply the same moral standards we claim to uphold elsewhere – opposition to segregation, to ethno-national supremacy, to systems that privilege one group over another—then the conclusion becomes difficult to avoid.

When a state defines itself in ways that systematically advantage one identity while disadvantaging others, it enters the realm of discrimination. When that discrimination is entrenched in law, policy, and daily life, it is not incidental. It is foundational.

This is why I say that Zionism is racism. Not as an insult, but as a description. It names a system in which identity determines rights, in which history is used to justify inequality, and in which the pursuit of one group’s security has come at the cost of another’s freedom.

There is a tendency to treat such statements as beyond the bounds of acceptable discourse, to insist that they are too harsh, too absolute, too divisive. But discomfort is not the same as inaccuracy. If anything, the resistance to naming the problem reflects how deeply normalized the system has become.

Conclusion:

No system built on inequality can endure without resistance, and no injustice has ever been resolved by refusing to name it. If we believe in dignity, equality, and freedom as universal principles, then they cannot stop at the borders of Palestine, nor be conditional on identity. The choice is not between politeness and truth – it is between maintaining a system of domination or confronting it honestly. I choose honesty. And honesty demands that we say it without hesitation, without dilution, and without apology: Zionism is racism.


The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.


Why is France’s bill against ‘new forms of anti-Semitism’ sparking controversy?

The French government is backing a draft law based on the idea that "hatred" of Israel is inseparable from hatred of the Jewish people. Critics of the “Yadan law” warn the new legislation will not just muzzle legitimate criticism of Israel but could further fuel anti-Semitism in France.


Issued on: 04/04/2026 - 
FRANCE24
By: Paul MILLAR


French ruling party MP Caroline Yadan (C) and other MPs take part in a gathering to call for the release of Israelis taken hostage by Hamas on October 7, 2023, outside the French National Assembly in Paris, January 16, 2024. © Thomas Samson, AFP

French lawmakers are on April 16 set to vote on a government-backed draft law based on the idea that rising anti-Semitism in the country with Europe’s largest Jewish population is grounded in an “obsessive” hatred of Israel.

The legislation has been drafted and redrafted since it was first introduced to the National Assembly at the end of 2024. Earlier drafts would have outlawed any comparison between Israel and Nazi Germany as "trivialising" the Holocaust and banned public speech calling for the ill-defined "denial" of a state's existence.

If passed, the law in its current form will broaden the definition of “apology for terrorism” – defending or justifying terrorist acts, considered an offence in France – to include speech that “implicitly” justifies or downplays acts deemed terrorist. The law would also make it illegal to call for the “destruction” of any country recognised by France, punishable by five years in prison.

The draft law’s preamble leaves little doubt which country the authors have in mind.


“Today, anti-Jewish hatred in our country is fuelled by an obsessive hatred of Israel, whose very existence is regularly delegitimised and criminalised,” it reads.

“This hatred of the State of Israel is now inseparable from hatred of Jews,” the law says.
UN's Albanese slams 'shameful and defamatory' anti-Semitism accusations against her

TÊTE À TÊTE © FRANCE 24
12:35


The proposed law – dubbed the “Yadan law” after lawmaker Caroline Yadan, who introduced it – has split the National Assembly. Critics say it is a misguided attempt to crack down on anti-Semitism that could backfire, possibly even fuelling further hatred against the Jewish community.

A petition on the official site of the National Assembly protesting the draft bill had garnered more than 160,000 signatures as of Friday.

France has experienced a steep rise in anti-Semitic acts since the Hamas-led terrorist attacks on October 7, 2023 and Israel's devastating military campaign in the besieged Gaza Strip. In 2025, more than half of all reported anti-religious acts targeted the Jewish community.

But the 2024 annual report released by France's National Consultative Commission on Human Rights on the fight against racism, anti-Semitism and xenophobia said its surveys have not found a statistically significant connection between respondents holding a negative view of the political or religious ideology of Zionism and anti-Semitic prejudices.

"It is therefore difficult to view anti-Zionism as the key driver of contemporary anti-Semitism," the report read.

Lawmakers on the left – from Socialist Party leaders to the Greens and the hard-left France Unbowed – have slammed the law as an attempt to stifle legitimate criticism of the Israeli government by defining it as fundamentally anti-Semitic. The far-right National Rally, the right-wing Les Républicains, the centre-right bloc and a handful of Socialist Party members including former president François Hollande have backed the bill.

The French government has not been shy about its support for the law – or its assertion that opposing the creation of a Jewish state on what was previously Palestinian territory is fundamentally anti-Semitic.

Speaking at the 40th annual dinner of the Representative Council of French Jewish Institutions in February, Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu said that the government would bring the bill – first introduced by Yadan in 2024 – to a vote in the spring, arguing that the country needed new laws to deal with what he described as a new form of hatred against France’s Jewish community.

“Contemporary anti-Zionism has become the mask of an old anti-Semitism,” he said, echoing the spirit of the draft law.


Viral video falsely claims Israeli Jews are ‘stealing land’ in Morocco
Truth or Fake © France 24
03:58



Lecornu went on to say that calls for Palestine to be free “From the River to the Sea” – a common slogan among activists – was an explicit call for Israel’s destruction since it refers to Israeli territory. Activists maintain the cry is a demand for freedom for those living on historically Palestinian land.

While Lecornu said that criticising the Israeli government and its military actions was legitimate, he accused those describing Israel’s war on Gaza as a "genocide" of “stripping Jews of their history and transforming them from victims into executioners”.

“Talking about ‘genocide’ in Gaza erases their memory of the Holocaust,” he said. “It downplays it and reverses it.”

An earlier version of the draft law proposed to make it illegal to compare Israel to Nazi Germany – an article that was removed on the advice of the Conseil d’état, France’s highest administrative court.

The International Court of Justice in 2024 warned that Israel’s devastating Gaza campaign could plausibly amount to genocide. A UN Commission of Inquiry the following year went further, labelling Israel’s actions in the Palestinian territory as genocidal in nature.


'Dangerous'

Nathalie Tehio, the president of France’s Human Rights League – a staunch opponent of the proposed law – warned that legally tying the protection of France’s Jewish community to protection of the State of Israel could very well fuel anti-Semitism rather than fight it.

“In reality, it equates French Jews with Israel – which is dangerous in and of itself, as this very equation fuels anti-Semitism,” she said. “But it also gives the impression that there is a double standard, because it is a law that targets the issue of anti-Semitism while also serving as a defence of Israel – so there is a double risk of reinforcing anti-Semitism.”

Other critics have slammed what they describe as overly broad or vague wording that makes it difficult to predict what statements would or wouldn’t fall afoul of the new legislation.

The French Lawyers’ Union in January warned that criminalising statements that “implicitly” justify or incite acts of terror would effectively turn judges into unwilling “thought police”.

Others have questioned the need for such a law in the first place.

François Dubuisson, a professor in international law at the Université libre de Bruxelles, said that France already had a raft of legislation targeting incitement to racial hatred and against "glorifying" terrorism.

“In my view, the current legislation in France is sufficient, because what remains in the amended version of the bill – after taking into account the opinion of the Conseil d’état – is primarily a broadening of the offense of advocating terrorism,” he said. “But it’s important to note that, even under current law, the offense of advocating terrorism is extremely broad and is, in fact, often heavily criticised by a number of international human rights organisations.”

Since the Hamas-led terror attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, France’s “apology for terrorism” law has been used to summon hundreds of activists, trade unionists, researchers and left-wing politicians for police questioning over statements they’ve made in connection to the attacks.

Rima Hassan, a hard-left member of the European Parliament, was taken into police custody on Thursday, accused of justifying terrorism in a social media post quoting a far-left Japanese militant involved in a deadly attack on Israel’s Lod Airport in 1972. Hassan, who later deleted the post, has been summoned for police questioning in 16 cases, 13 of which have been dropped without charges.

Dubuisson said that the need for a law banning calls for a state’s destruction seemed even less clear.

“To my knowledge, this does not exist anywhere in the world,” he said. “I’m not aware of any legislation – and particularly in Europe – that contains such an offence.”

He argued that calls for the violent destruction of a state and its people would already leave the speaker exposed to a raft of existing laws criminalising incitement to violence.

And while the text’s preamble specifically mentioned Israel, the current wording would also cover calls for the destruction of the state of Palestine, which France recognised in September last year – a decision that prompted Yadan to leave French President Emmanuel Macron’s parliamentary group.

Tehio pointed out that Israel’s existence as a Jewish state continues to be fiercely debated, including by anti-Zionist Jews campaigning for what has become known as a “one-state solution” – Israelis and Palestinians sharing a single state with full and equal rights for all.

“There are some, for example, who believe that there should be a single state comprising both Israel and the Palestinian state together,” she said.

Just what statements the law​ would ultimately penalise remains deeply unclear. Tehio said that the French PM's example of a direct call for Israel’s destruction – “From the River to the Sea” – can also be heard on the lips of far-right Israeli activists, though in very different contexts.

“Those who use that phrase will indeed be penalised, because it would be interpreted as implying either the destruction of the Palestinian state or the destruction of the Israeli state," she said. "But that actually makes no sense.”
Opinion

The normalisation of brutality: When will we reclaim our humanity?


April 4, 2026 
by Adnan Hmidan
Middle East Monitor.


Displaced Palestinians try to carry on their daily lives under harsh conditions in Khan Younis, Palestine on April 02, 2026. [Abed Rahim Khatib – Anadolu Agency]


 are witnessing today across occupied Palestine is not a glitch in the system of international order, nor is it a sudden detour from the established behaviour of the Israeli occupation. The greatest mistake observers can make is to treat the current escalation of atrocities as a momentary lapse in self-restraint or a chaotic exception that can be managed through diplomatic statements of concern.

In reality, what is unfolding before our eyes is the natural state of a colonial project. When we understand the structural foundations of the occupation, we realise that brutality is not a political choice, rather a functional necessity for its survival.

The infrastructure of cruelty

In the logic of the occupier, it is entirely normal for a Palestinian prisoner and hostage to be tortured, humiliated, and stripped of his or her basic humanity. It is entirely normal for the halls of the Knesset to echo with calls for the summary execution of detainees, turning state institutions into platforms for legislated revenge. This is not a breakdown of democracy; it is the unfiltered expression of a regime that views the indigenous population as a security threat to be eliminated rather than a people with rights.

In occupied Jerusalem, the normal state of affairs is the systematic barring of worshippers from Al-Aqsa Mosque, while the sanctuary is open for radical settlers to perform provocative rituals under military protection. This is a calculated strategy of habituation. The goal is to repeat the violation so frequently that it loses its shock value, transforming the desecration of one of Islam’s holiest sites into a mere routine in the daily news cycle.

Gaza and the West Bank: A laboratory of erasure

The genocide unfolding in Gaza is the ultimate manifestation of this normality. The flattening of entire residential blocks, the systematic starvation of two million people, and the erasure of entire family lineages from the civil registry are carried out with a terrifying sense of entitlement.

This is facilitated by a global diplomatic umbrella that perversely redefines the victim as the aggressor and the executioner as the victim.

Simultaneously, the West Bank undergoes a silent genocide. Through a suffocating network of checkpoints, nightly raids that shatter the peace of families, and the relentless expansion of illegal settlements that devour the land like a cancer, the occupation seeks to make Palestinian life impossible. Such is the behaviour of a thief who can never be at peace nor can rest, as long as the rightful owner of the house remains present.

The true abnormality: Our adaptation


The real crisis, however, does not lie in the occupier’s violence, for that is its inherent nature. The crisis lies in the demand for the rest of us to become abnormal.

It is inherently abnormal to be asked to adapt to this reality. It is abnormal to be told to understand the security concerns of the oppressor while our children are being pulled from the rubble. It is abnormal for normalization to be marketed as a rational choice, or for coexistence with a system of apartheid to be framed as a civil virtue.

We must ask the hard questions: What kind of peace is built upon the ruins of demolished homes? What kind of realism demands that we accept the slow death of a nation as an unchangeable fact? The attempt to redefine the Palestinian struggle as a conflict that can be managed, rather than a crime that must be ended, is a profound moral distortion.

The trap of de-sensitisation

The most dangerous weapon in the occupation’s arsenal is not the missile or the tank; it is our own habituation. The occupation bets on time. It bets that the world will eventually grow tired of the images of bloodied children, that the social media posts will decrease, and that the outrage will be replaced by a weary silence.

When we stop being shocked by the sight of mass graves, and when we begin to view the ethnic cleansing of a people as an unfortunate geopolitical reality, we have lost our moral compass. To “get used to” oppression is to become a silent partner therewith. The natural state for any free human being is to remain in a state of constant, active rejection of injustice.

Redefining realism

For too long, we have been told that realism means accepting the crumbs of sovereignty under the shadow of a sniper’s tower. But true realism is to call things by their real names:

* Settlement is not urban expansion; it is theft.

* Resistance is not terrorism; it is a universal right and a sacred duty.

* Neutrality in the face of genocide is not objectivity; it is complicity.

Our role as intellectuals, activists, and supporters of justice is to shatter this manufactured normalcy. We must remain abnormal in the eyes of a distorted international system. We must refuse to be courteous victims who accept their fate with quiet dignity.

Reclaiming the human spirit

The occupation is a historical anomaly, a remnant of a colonial era that the rest of the world has supposedly moved past. It survives by pretending to be a normal state. But a state that lives on the blood of the innocent and the theft of a land can never be normal; it is a moral deformity.

We will reclaim our normality only when we stop trying to fit into the world’s unjust expectations. We are normal when we refuse to forget. We are normal when we teach our children that the map of Palestine is indivisible. We are normal when our anger remains as fresh as it was on the first day of the Nakba.

The greatest danger is not that the oppressor practices his oppression; it is that we grow accustomed to it. Let us vow never to be normal in the face of the abnormal. Let us remain the voice that screams against the silence, until the natural state of Palestine; free and one, is finally restored.

The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.


Trump’s racist rant against Somalis shows his imperialist ignorance

During a White House Easter lunch, US President Donald Trump called people of Somali origin “low-IQ” and “bad people”

Thomas Tews ~

On Wednesday, 1 April, US President Donald Trump attended an Easter lunch in the East Room of the White House. During the event, Trump called Somalia “just terrible” and “probably the worst, most dangerous country” with “no government” and “no police”. In his view, Somalis “have no money, no nothing” and “just shoot each other all day long”. Trump also called Somalis who had come to the United States, specifically to Minnesota, “low-IQ” and “bad people”, who “don’t want to work”, and said they “stole 19 billion dollars”. He also insulted Somali-born US Representative Ilhan Omar as “a stone-cold crook”, who had “married her brother”.

That Somalia’s current economic misery is not rooted in the supposed nature of Somalis, as postulated by Trump, becomes clear by looking at the rich history the area prior to European colonisation:

As early as 600 AD, the coastal inhabitants of East Africa were trading across the Indian Ocean for the first time. This trade between Africa’s east coast, Arabia and Asia began to flourish in the 8th century, and between the 11th and 15th centuries, the port settlements along Africa’s east coast developed into established trading cities. Muslim travellers had settled along the coast amongst the Bantu-speaking population, who were descended from immigrants from West Africa, and thus the unique hybrid Swahili culture emerged. Some 400 Swahili city-states were scattered along a 3,219 km coastline from present-day Somalia to present-day Mozambique, including Mogadishu, the current capital of Somalia.

Through trade with the African kingdoms in the interior, the Swahili obtained raw materials such as gold, copper, ivory, salt and iron from the Great Lakes region in the East African Great Rift Valley, which they transported to the coast and sold there to foreign traders from the Red Sea, the Persian Gulf, the Comoros, India and Madagascar. These traders arrived in dhows, Arab sailing ships, laden with cloves, pepper, ginger, jewels, pearls and more, and subsequently exported the East African goods to Oman, India, China and Cambodia.

From 1285 to 1415, the powerful Sultanate of Ifat flourished in parts of what is now Somalia, Ethiopia and Djibouti. Important trade routes ran from its centre, the port city of Zeila.

In 1418, Chinese sailors led by Zheng He reached East Africa and landed in Mogadishu and Brava in present-day Somalia. They began trading on equal terms with the East African population, exchanging valuable Chinese goods, including silk and porcelain, for local goods such as animal skins, tortoiseshell and rhinoceros horns. This trade in luxury goods and artefacts between China and East Africa boosted the incomes of East African artisans and merchants, thereby increasing the prosperity of East African societies.

In his neocolonial, racist view of Somalia and its people, Trump ignores the policy of continued imperialist intervention by the United States. This supported Siad Barre’s authoritarian regime in Somalia during the Cold War to secure its geopolitical interests and counter Soviet influence, led to long-term instability, corruption and human rights violations in the country. The 1993 Battle of Mogadishu, in which US troops were involved, ended in disaster and contributed to the further destabilisation of Somalia.

Today, life expectancy among the Somali population is only 54 years for men and 59 years for women (by comparison, in the United States it is 79 years for men and 83 years for women). In the 2024 Global Hunger Index, Somalia ranks last out of 127 countries for which sufficient usable data is available. According to the index, 51.3% of the Somali population is undernourished, and 25.6% of children under the age of 5 suffer from stunted growth. Despite this situation, described as “alarming”, the Trump administration drastically cut financial support for humanitarian development programmes in Somalia in March 2025.

That Trump is seemingly unaware of and uninterested in learning about the rich history of present-day Somalia, which contradicts his racist worldview, is a testimony of his neo-colonial, imperialist ignorance.\

South Korea brings old reactor back online

 04/04/2026, Saturday
TRT/AA


File photo

South Korea has restarted one of its oldest nuclear reactors, the Gori-2 unit in Busan, following a three-year shutdown for extensive safety upgrades. The reactor, first commissioned in 1983, was halted in 2023 when its 40-year operating license expired. After completing mandatory safety inspections and facility improvements under current regulatory standards, authorities granted approval late last year for the reactor to return to service.

South Korea brought one of its most aged nuclear reactors back online on Saturday, following a lengthy shutdown that lasted nearly three years for major safety renovations. The Gori-2 reactor, located at the Gori Nuclear Power Plant in the southeastern coastal city of Busan, resumed operations after receiving regulatory approval, according to local media reports citing state-run operator Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co.

The reactor first began generating electricity in 1983 as South Korea's third nuclear unit and played a foundational role in the country's early expansion of atomic energy. However, operations came to a halt in 2023 when its 40-year license expired, triggering a mandatory comprehensive review process that included rigorous safety inspections and facility upgrades required under current regulatory standards.

Regulators greenlight return to service

Regulatory authorities granted approval for the restart late last year, allowing the aging reactor to reconnect to the national grid after meeting all updated safety requirements. The three-year offline period allowed engineers to carry out extensive refurbishment work designed to extend the reactor's operational life while ensuring compliance with modern safety protocols.

Nuclear power remains key to South Korea's energy mix

The restart of Gori-2 reflects South Korea's ongoing effort to balance energy security concerns with nuclear safety considerations. Atomic power remains a major component of the country's electricity supply, helping to reduce dependence on imported fossil fuels. The decision to refurbish and restart an aging reactor rather than decommission it underscores Seoul's commitment to maintaining a stable and diverse energy portfolio amid global supply uncertainties.

Germany warns Goethe-Institut over exhibition with Palestinian artist

04.04.2026, dpa


Photo: Sebastian Gollnow/dpa


The German Foreign Office has criticized the country's own cultural organization, the Goethe-Institut, over the participation of a US-Palestinian artist in a recent exhibition in Lithuania with German funding.

“There should be no doubt whatsoever at events organized by German intermediary organizations that the federal government firmly rejects anti-Semitism and hatred of Israel,” the ministry said in a statement on Saturday in response to a report in the Bild tabloid.

It was made clear to the Goethe-Institut - which is largely funded by the Foreign Office - that "greater care is required in the early stages of planning and organizing events with partner organizations," the ministry added.

The exhibition "Bells and Cannons – Contemporary Art in Times of Militarization" ran from mid-October to early March in Vilnius and featured a film by Basma al-Sharif, a Kuwaiti-born Palestinian artist currently based in Berlin.

The filmmaker's appearance at the Dusseldorf Art Academy in western Germany earlier this year was the subject of a controversy after Jewish organizations accused her of anti-Semitic posts online.

The exhibition in the Lithuanian capital was a collaboration between the Contemporary Art Centre Vilnius (CAC), the Goethe-Institut in Vilnius and the Academy of Arts in Berlin.

The CAC curated the exhibition, a spokeswoman for the Goethe-Institut confirmed, adding that "no works with anti-Semitic content were on display."

However, she said some posts on the artist’s Instagram account were not compatible with the Goethe-Institut’s values, "specifically the denial of Israel’s right to exist."

The cultural organization had not been aware of the posts. "We deeply regret this," the spokeswoman added.

She said the Goethe-Institut rejects any form of anti-Semitism, and sees the recognition of Israel’s right to exist as indispensable.