Wednesday, February 11, 2026


Suffocating an Island: What the U.S. Blockade Is Doing to Cuba

by Medea Benjamin / February 11th, 2026


Electric motorcycles are Cuba’s response to the fuel crisis.

Marta Jiménez, a hairdresser in Cuba’s eastern city of Holguín, covered her face with her hands and broke down crying when I asked her about Trump’s blockade of the island—especially now that the U.S. is choking off oil shipments.

“You can’t imagine how it touches every part of our lives,” she sobbed. “It’s a vicious, all-encompassing spiral downward. With no gasoline, buses don’t run, so we can’t get to work. We have electricity only three to six hours a day. There’s no gas for cooking, so we’re burning wood and charcoal in our apartments. It’s like going back 100 years. The blockade is suffocating us—especially single mothers,” she said crying into her hands “and no one is stopping these demons: Trump and Marco Rubio.”

We came to Holguín to deliver 2,500 pounds of lentils, thanks to fundraising by CODEPINK and the Cuban-American group Puentes de Amor. On our last trip, we brought 50-pound bags of powdered milk to the children’s hospital. With Trump now imposing a brutal, medieval siege on the island, this humanitarian aid is more critical than ever. But lentils and milk cannot power a country. What Cubans really need is oil.

There were no taxis at the airport. We hitchhiked into town on the truck that came to pick up the donations. The road was eerily empty. In the city, there were few gas-powered cars and no buses running, but the streets were full of bicycles, electric motorcycles, and three-wheeled electric vehicles used to transport people and goods. Most of the motorcycles—Chinese, Japanese, or Korean—are shipped in from Panama. With a price tag near $2,000, only those with family abroad sending remittances can afford them.

Thirty-five-year-old Javier Silva gazed longingly at a Yamaha parked on the street. “I could never buy one of those on my salary of 4,000 pesos a month,” he said. With inflation soaring, the dollar now fetches about 480 pesos, making his monthly income worth less than ten dollars.

Cubans don’t pay rent or have mortgages; they own their homes. And while healthcare has deteriorated badly in recent years because of shortages of medicines and equipment, it remains free–a system gasping but not abandoned.

The biggest expense is food. Markets are stocked, but prices are out of reach—especially for coveted items like pork, chicken, and milk. Even tomatoes are now unaffordable for many families.

Holguín was once known as the breadbasket of Cuba because of its rich agricultural land. That reputation took a severe hit this year when Hurricane Melissa tore through the province, destroying vast areas of crops. Replanting and repairing the damage without gasoline for tractors or electricity for irrigation is nearly impossible. Less food means higher prices.

Production across the economy is grinding to a halt. Factories can’t function without electricity, and many skilled workers have given up their state jobs because wages are so low. Jorge, whom I met selling bologna in the market, used to be an engineer at a state enterprise. Verónica, once a teacher, now sells sweets she bakes at home—when the power is on. Ironically, while Marco Rubio claims he wants to bring capitalism to Cuba, U.S. sanctions are crushing the very private sector that most Cubans now depend on to survive.

I talked to people on the street who blame the Cuban government for the crisis and openly say they can’t wait for the fall of communism. Young people told me that their goal is to leave the island and live somewhere they can make a decent living. But I didn’t meet a single person who supported the blockade or a U.S. invasion.

“This government is terrible,” said a thin man who changes money on the street—an illegal but tolerated activity. But when I showed him a photo of Marco Rubio, he didn’t hesitate. “That man is the devil. A self-serving, slimy politician who doesn’t give a damn about the Cuban people.”

Others put the blame squarely on the United States. They point to the dramatic improvement in their lives after Presidents Obama and Raúl Castro reached an agreement and Washington eased many sanctions in 2014–2016. “It was the same Cuban government we have now,” one man told me. “But when the U.S. loosened the rope around our necks, we could breathe. If they just left us alone, we could find our own solutions.”

The only way Cubans are surviving this siege is because they help one another. They trade rice for coffee with neighbors. They improvise—no hay, pero se resuelve (we don’t have much, but we make it work). The government provides daily meals for the most vulnerable—the elderly, the disabled, mothers with no income—but each day it becomes harder as the state has less food to distribute and less fuel to cook with.

At one feeding center, an elderly volunteer told us he spends hours every day scavenging for firewood. He proudly showed us a chunk of a wooden pallet, nails and all. “This guarantees tomorrow’s meal,” he said—his face caught between pride and sorrow.

So how long can Cubans hold on as conditions worsen? And what is the endgame?

When I asked people where this is leading, they had no idea. Rubio wants regime change, but no one can explain how that would happen or who would replace the current government. Some speculate a deal could be struck with Trump. “Make Trump the minister of tourism,” a hotel clerk joked, only half joking. “Give him a hotel and a golf course—a Mar-a-Lago in Varadero—and maybe he’d leave us alone.”

Who will win this demonic game Trump and Rubio are playing with the lives of eleven million Cubans?

Ernesto, who fixes refrigerators when the power is on, places his bet on the Cuban people. “We’re rebels,” he told me. “We defeated Batista in 1959. We survived the Bay of Pigs. We endured the Special Period when the Soviet Union collapsed and we were left with nothing. We’ll survive this too.”

He summed it up with a line Cubans know by heart, from the great songwriter Silvio Rodríguez: El tiempo está a favor de los pequenos, de los desnudos, de los olvidados—time belongs to the small, the exposed, the forgotten.

In the long sweep of time, endurance outlasts domination.

Medea Benjamin is the co-founder of the women-led peace group CODEPINK and co-founder of the human rights group Global Exchange. She is the author of 11 books, including War in Ukraine: Making Sense of a Senseless Conflict, coauthored with Nicolas J.S. Davies. Her most recent book, coauthored with David Swanson, is NATO: What You Need to KnowRead other articles by Medea.

Canadian Airlines start halting flights to Cuba amid US fuel blockade
DW with Reuters, AFP
FEB 11, 2026

Three Canadian airlines have suspended flights to Cuba due to a lack of guaranteed fuel supply. Germany also issued a travel warning.

What to know:Two more Canadian airlines join Air Canada in suspending services to Cuba

Germany issued an advisory against all non-essential travel to Cuba

Fuel stocks on the island are running out as US puts pressure on Cuba's oil suppliers

Which airlines have suspended services to Cuba?

Two more Canadian airlines, Air Transat and WestJet, announced a halt in flights to Cuba. The move comes after Air Canada said Monday it was stopping service to the island due to a lack of guaranteed fuel supply.

Air Transat said it was canceling all flights to Cuba until at least April 30. This follows "the rapid developments of the past few hours and the announcement by Cuban authorities of an anticipated aviation fuel shortage at destination airports," it said in a statement.

Cuba warned on Sunday that jet fuel will be unavailable at airports across the island beginning 10 February through 11 March.

WestJet announced an "orderly wind-down" of its services, adding it would begin sending empty planes to Cuba, stocked with extra fuel, to bring customers home.

Air Canada said it would also send empty flights to pick up and fly home about 3,000 customers in Cuba.

Similar crises have prompted carriers to refuel in nearby third countries, including Panama, the Bahamas, the Dominican Republic and the United States.

The fuel shortage is a further economic blow to the country that relies heavily on tourism.


Why doesn't Cuba have oil and jet fuel?

Historically, Venezuela was the biggest supplier of oil and jet fuel to Cuba followed by Mexico.

Venezuela provided about one-third of the island's daily needs in 2025.

But Cuba hasn't received any crude or refined products from the South American country since mid-December when the US started blocking Venezuelan oil exports to the communist-run island.

This was even before US troops kidnapped Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro in early January.

Mexico only ever shipped a fraction of the oil that came from Venezuela.



But Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum confirmed on Monday that oil shipments to Cuba are "on hold" following US President Donald Trump threats to impose tariffs on any country that provides oil to the Caribbean island.

Why has Germany issued a travel warning for Cuba?

Germany advised on Tuesday against all non-essential travel to Cuba

"Cuba is facing an acute energy crisis, which is also being compounded by widespread dilapidated energy infrastructure," the German foreign ministry said in the advisory.

The country is facing "significant shortages in energy and fuel supplies, which are affecting all areas of life" including medical care, it said.

"Public transport, street lighting, traffic lights, cash machines, communication and security systems are already severely restricted or may fail," it said.


How bad is Cuba's energy crisis?

The oil shortages have threatened to plunge Cuba into complete darkness, with power plants struggling to keep the lights on.

The Cuban government has announced emergency measures, including a four-day working week for state-owned companies and fuel sale restrictions.

Cuban officials also announced Monday that bank hours have been reduced and cultural events suspended.

In the capital Havana, the public bus system has effectively ground to a halt, leaving residents stranded as endemic power outages and grueling fuel lines reach a breaking point.

Edited by: Roshni Majumdar
Kate Hairsine Reporter and senior editor


'Trump wants to reverse history,' professor says as oil blockade pushes Cuba to the brink



Issued on: 10/02/2026 - FRANCE24

PLAYING TIME 11:24 min



The island economy was already struggling under the burden of decades of US sanctions, but the situation in Cuba has rapidly deteriorated since Donald Trump signed an executive order threatening to impose tariffs on countries that sell or provide oil to the Caribbean nation. As airlines suspend flights to the island, long queues are forming at gas stations, with fewer buses running and power cuts hitting homes, hospitals and other state institutions. FRANCE 24's Sharon Gaffney speaks with Lillian Guerra, Professor of Cuban and Caribbean History at the University of Florida.




US oil blockade: How long before Cuba collapses?

Andreas Knobloch0
DW
February 7, 2026

As the US oil embargo on Cuba takes hold, the country is rapidly running out of fuel. The effects on the country's economy and population could be devastating, a Latin America expert in Havana told DW.


For days, a cold weather front had brought polar air to Cuba, causing temperatures to drop below freezing on some parts of the island for the first time in recorded history.

But the frosty air hasn't been the only thing bearing down on Cuba from the north.


The United States, after attacking Venezuela — Cuba's closest ally — and abducting its leader Nicolas Maduro has effectively cut off Venezuelan oil supplies to Havana. And in late January, US President Donald Trump called Cuba "an unusual and extraordinary threat" to national security and threatened to impose tariffs on any state that supplied oil or oil products to the island nation.

Cuban President Migual Diaz-Canel initially slammed the move as "fascist, criminal and genocidal." He has since stated that his country was willing to talk with the US, but "without pressure or preconditions."

He has also warned that Cuba was "close to failing" and announced forthcoming rationing plans to address the energy crisis.


'Trump is harming us simple people'

"Trump is crazy, he wants to take away the very air that we breathe," says Aleida, who runs a homestay in Havana and did not want to share her last name, like all private citizens DW spoke with. "And the other one is even more of a fanatic when it comes to Cuba."

She's referring to Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state and son of Cuban migrants. He's long been seen as a leading voice of "maximum pressure" toward Venezuela and Cuba to force regime change.

"We can only wait and see what happens next," Aleida says, her face drawn with concern.

Rachel, a 21-year-old civil servant, feels a similar uncertainty: "Sometimes I think that [Trump] will attack us next, and sometimes I think he won't let us drown, so he can make himself look like the good guy."

She adds that she expects day-to-day life to get more difficult moving forward.

"Trump is harming us simple people, not the government," says Ramon, a taxi driver in his mid-sixties whose main income is from tourism, which declined sharply in the past year.

By now, gas can only be bought with foreign currency and after hours of waiting in line at dollar-only gas stations.

The country is only able to produce about 40% of the energy it requires. Blackouts have become commonplace — they can last 10 to 15 hours and have even reached the capital, Havana.

Bert Hoffmann, a leading researcher at Germany's GIGA Institute for Latin American Studies, says that apart from that, life in Havana is running its regular course.

"I've observed a widespread wait-and-see attitude. There's a great normalization of crisis, a sort of keep calm and carry on," he tells DW. "The blackouts have increased, fuel is in even shorter supply, but it's been fairly gradual. There are still cars on the road."

He adds, however, that this appearance of normalcy is deceptive: The country has "no prospects" of getting oil into the country in the near future, he believes.

A watershed moment in Caracas


Hoffmann says that things have been different since January 3, the day when Venezuela ceased being Cuba's main oil supplier. The island's second-largest supplier, Mexico, also halted its planned oil shipments to Cuba in January.

Hardly any oil shipments have reached the island since December. In January, Cuba appears to have purchased a one-off tanker shipment of oil, bought at spot prices. Departing from Lome, Togo, the shipment was supposed to arrive in early February, but changed its course along the way toward the Dominican Republic.

Hoffmann believes it's safe to assume that this happened due to pressure from the United States.

"That means that, even if Cuba is able to buy oil, it wouldn't arrive," he says, arguing that the same would apply to possible shipments from AlgeriaAngolaChina or Vietnam.

"For the time being, I'd assume that the US is investing a lot in preventing this," Hoffmann adds. "It's likely that Cuba won't be getting any oil into the country for the foreseeable future. And that's brutal."

Cuba's current demand for oil is an estimated 100,000 barrels of crude oil per day (bpd). Until now, between a third and a quarter of that was sourced from Venezuela. In 2025, Mexico supplied between 6,000 and 12,000 bpd, while Russia and Algeria delivered smaller amounts.

"There are rumors that the oil will run out in February," Rachel says. "It's February now."

She hopes the country will be able to reduce its consumption to be able to make the remaining oil last a little longer.
Cuba can't cover its needs with renewable energy or local oil

In the past years, with the support of China, Cuba invested massively in solar energy. But these parks are unable to cover the country's electricity needs. The island's power supply still relies mainly on accident-prone thermal plants of Soviet design, making Cuba heavily dependent on energy imports.

Cuba's own heavy oil can only cover about 40% of the country's overall energy consumption. But it's ill-suited for most fuels, so it's mainly used for power generation.

Hoffmann says nobody really knows how long the remaining oil will last. In late January, the British daily Financial Times predicted the resources could be stretched another 15 to 20 days.

Either way, the fallout will be fatal.

"Basically, it's a matter of [an unknown number of] weeks until the fuel runs out. Then, not only will tourists not be able to get from the beaches to the airports, but food won't make it from the farms to the cities," Hoffmann explains.

And without food the people will go hungry.

Speaking about a German company that produces medical oxygen for hospitals in Cuba, he continues: "If the trucks have no fuel, then the hospitals won't be able to get any oxygen, and the patients will die."

Mexico wants to mediate between Cuba and the US

Mexico recently announced it would be sending humanitarian aid, and was evaluating "diplomatic channels" to be able to send oil to Cuba. But the country's possibilities are limited, as Mexico's economy is very heavily tied to that of the United States. And with the US-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) trade accord set for formal review this summer, Trump has extra leverage.

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has offered to mediate talks between Havana and Washington. But it's unclear what there is to talk about. US State Secretary Rubio has already stated at a recent Senate hearing that he "would love to see" regime change in Cuba.

Unlike Venezuela, Cuba has less economic value than it does symbolic importance. The Caribbean island in many ways represents states' resistance to the Monroe doctrine, which the United States often cites to claim a special sphere of influence in the western hemisphere — notably Latin America.

"They have a score to settle," Hoffmann says. "Washington believes they've got all their hands around [Cuba's] neck, and the time has come for Cuba to capitulate — whatever that might mean in specific terms."

Consequently, he says he has a hard time imagining "which points Cuban leaders might agree upon with Trump and Rubio."
Russia to continue supplying oil to Cuba

Over the past days, Trump has said that his administration was involved in talks with Cuba's leadership, who in turn has denied that ― while both sides had communicated, Cuba said, they had not progressed to formal negotiations.

On Tuesday, Cuba's deputy foreign minister Carlos Fernandez de Cossio told the Spanish news agency EFE that "we've exchanged messages," but it "would be a mistake to say that a bilateral negotiation is being designed."

Havana has, however, repeatedly expressed its willingness to engage in dialogue "that is serious, constructive, responsible and respectful of both states' sovereign equality," de Cossio said.

In light of the effective oil blockade, de Cossio added that his country had "limited options" to manage resources. His government has recently announced a contingency plan "that will require a lot of work, creativity and sacrifice," the minister said.

Meanwhile, Russia's ambassador to Havana, Viktor Koronelli, told Russian news agency RIA in an interview that Moscow would continue to supply oil to Cuba.

"Russian oil has been supplied to Cuba on numerous occasion in recent years," he said. "We expect this practice to continue."

This article was originally written in German and translated by Maren Sass.


AS IT HAPPENED



Why scientists warn of privately funded geoengineering


DW
February 8, 2026

As the climate crisis intensifies, interest in solar engineering is increasing, including among private companies and investors. But the technique is controversial and lacks regulation.


Startups are looking into releasing aerosols into the stratosphere to reflect sunlight and reduce global temperatures
Image: ingimage/IMAGO


As global heating worsens, interest in solar engineering is rising, including from private companies and investors. But the technique remains controversial and lacks regulation.

The planet is heating up faster than expected. Greenhouse gas concentrations continue to rise at record rates, leaving the world off track to limit warming below 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels. The latest data shows 2025 was the third hottest year on record.

That growing gap between climate targets and reality is fueling renewed interest in geoengineering — interventions that intentionally alter the Earth's climate system. Among them is solar geoengineering, which aims to cool the planet by reflecting sunlight back into space.

The technology remains largely experimental and could have far-reaching social, political, and environmental impacts if deployed at scale, according to scientists.

Until recently, most solar geoengineering research was carried out by nonprofits and public research institutions, funded by governments and philanthropies. But that landscape is shifting.

Over the past three years, two commercial startups — Israeli-US Stardust Solutions and California-based Make Sunsets — have emerged. As reported by media outlet Heatmap News, Stardust Solutions recently announced it had raised $60 million (around €52 million) in venture capital.

Can solar geoengineering cool the planet  09:27


Yet scientists and researchers, even those who support solar geoengineering, are concerned about for-profit companies entering a field that lacks proper regulation.

"What is worrying is private money coming in that's not accountable to anyone, in sums that potentially could far exceed what has been on the table thus far from governments," said Cynthia Scharf, a senior climate fellow at independent think tank, the Center for Future Generations.
What is stratospheric aerosol injection?

The most widely studied solar engineering technique is stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI).

It involves the injection of highly reflective particles into the stratosphere — the atmospheric layer between 4 to 30 miles (6 to 50 kilometers) above Earth's surface — to reflect a small amount of sunlight back into space.

This mimics the cooling effects of volcanic eruptions, which spew droplets of sulfur gases into the stratosphere. These gases mix with water vapor to form tiny reflective particles called aerosols. The 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines resulted in global cooling of 0.5 C for a few years.

So far, SAI has mostly been tested in labs and computer simulations. Since 2008, two outdoor experiments involving the release of small amounts of aerosols have been completed in Russia and the UK. Other planned university-led experiments in the UK and Sweden were canceled following opposition from civil society and community groups.

When Mount Pinatubo erupted it cooled the planet as it injected millions of tons of aerosols into the atmosphere
Image: BULLIT MARQUEZ/AP/picture alliance

Make Sunsets began launching balloons filled with sulfur dioxide over Mexico and the US in 2022. As a result, the Mexican government issued a ban on solar geoengineering deployments above its territory.

The company says on its website it has so far released 213 balloons, selling them to companies and individuals as "cooling credits." It remains unclear who is buying the credits, but the quantities are too small to have any measurable benefit to the climate, according to Silverlining, a nonprofit focused on near-term climate risks. DW reached out to Make Sunsets for comment, but the company hadn't responded by time of publication.

But a large-scale SAI deployment would entail sending high-altitude aircraft or balloons to release the particles continuously for decades, since aerosols typically remain in the stratosphere for only months to a few years. Once injected, they would be carried around the globe by the jet stream, dispersing widely but not evenly.

"There'll be a global decrease of maybe half a degree Celsius, but that decrease will be very patchy," said James Dyke, Associate Professor in Earth System Science at the University of Exeter. It could also cause unpredictable precipitation patterns and weather extremes in different parts of the world, he added.

The need for transparency in research

Much of the SAI research to date has focused on injection of sulfate particles — the same type emitted by volcanoes. However, there are side effects associated with sulfate aerosols, including possible damage to the ozone layer and increased air pollution. This could in turn lead to higher rates of respiratory illnesses.

"We don't believe this is a safe or responsible option for policymakers to consider," said Stardust Solutions CEO Yanai Yedvab in an emailed response.

Stardust Solutions claims it has developed a different kind of particle, made of components that are "abundant in nature, chemically inert in the stratosphere, and safe for humans and ecosystems."

The company has so far not released any information about the composition of the particle it is developing. Yedvab said they will begin publishing research this year. But some scientists are skeptical about the safety claims.

"Even if you put something into the atmosphere which is safe in the stratosphere, by the time it's processed and come down to the lower atmosphere, it may be an active particle that's dangerous," said David Keith, a professor of geophysical science at the University of Chicago.

Yedvab said no outdoor testing will take place for now.
Balancing private interests and global safety

Stardust Solutions sees its role as "technological enablers," providing governments and the international community with the tools and evidence needed to make informed decisions amid an escalating climate crisis.

"The last thing anyone who takes this crisis seriously should want is for governments to realize in a decade that they need to deploy SRT (sunlight reflection technology) and for the research, engineering, and de-risking not to be complete," said Yedvab.

But Keith says technology as complex and uncertain as SAI — and marked by significant "unknown unknowns" — requires public confidence above all else.

"I think free-market capital competition can be great when what you're producing is something that's easy to test," he said. "But for things where the whole issue is trust … I'm much more skeptical about the role of private money."

Stardust Solutions will be seeking a patent to claim intellectual property rights for its particle, and recent reporting by energy and environment-focused news outlet E&E News revealed the company has been working with a law firm to lobby the US government.

"We've been informing policymakers about our work and the need for appropriate and robust oversight of sunlight reflection research and development," said Yedvab.

While US President Donald Trump's anti-climate stance has been underscored by his decision to withdraw the US from dozens of major climate pacts, it is unclear what the administration's thoughts are on solar geoengineering.

Yedvab said Stardust Solutions would only work with governments that have "adequate regulatory frameworks, which meet high global standards," and that any discussion and decision on demonstrations and deployment would be conducted by governments and policymakers.

Currently, there is no specific international treaty to regulate SAI research or deployment, and most governments have no regulations either. Some experts have called for an international non-use agreement.

Ocean iron fertilization, another geoengineering method with potentially global effects, was regulated in 2013 following strong opposition from environmental groups and governments. By adding iron to the ocean, the technique aims to boost carbon-absorbing plankton, but risks disrupting delicate marine ecosystems. While research is still permitted, commercialization is not.

Before the ban, several US-based startups had announced their intentions to invest in the technology and start selling carbon credits.

Edited by: Tamsin Walker
Naomi Mihara Freelance multimedia journalist reporting on health, environment, science and global development.
Corruption watchdog warns graft on the rise globally
DW
February 10, 2026

Once seen as anti-graft strongholds, the US, UK, Canada and Sweden are slipping into decline due to a lack of political leadership, Transparency International's Corruption Perception Index has revealed.



The global average perceived corruption score stands at 42 out of 100, its lowest level in more than a decade
Image: Thomas Trutschel/photothek/picture alliance


Even the world's established democracies are increasingly sliding into corruption. Transparency International's 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), published on Tuesday, shows a troubling erosion of leadership in combating corruption in the West.

The 31st edition of the CPI ranks more than 180 countries and territories on perceived levels of public sector corruption, showing declines for longstanding strong performers, including the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and Sweden.

The 2025 index found that the number of countries scoring above 80 — once a benchmark for clean governance — has shrunk dramatically from 12 a decade ago to just five this year.

Although Denmark achieved the highest score (89) for the eighth year in a row, closely followed by Finland (88) and Singapore (84), Transparency International decried a lack of "bold leadership" globally, which it said was weakening efforts to tackle graft.

"Several governments no longer see the fight against corruption as a priority," Francois Valerian, chair of Transparency International, told DW. "Governments may have had the impression that ... they had done everything to address corruption and had to turn to other priorities."

Why is the US falling in global corruption scores?


The CPI index, which ranks each nation on a scale from 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean), shows the US dropped to its lowest-ever score of 64, down 10 points from 2016.

Transparency International noted that the US political climate has been deteriorating for more than a decade and said the latest data doesn't fully reflect developments since US President Donald Trump returned to the White House last year.

Although the US ranking stayed stable for most of the Biden administration, previous reports highlighted high-profile ethics scandals at the US Supreme Court as responsible for a large drop last year.

"We can't blame everything on Trump because there were concerning reforms that started before him," Valerian told DW.

The report did, however, cite the "use of public office to target and restrict independent voices," ... "the normalisation of conflicted and transactional politics," ... "the politicisation of prosecutorial decision making ... and "actions that undermine judicial independence." The anti-corruption body said these moves "all send a dangerous signal that corrupt practices are acceptable."


Trump has created a visa fast lane for wealthy foreigners for a $1 million fee, which critics say is open to abuse
Image: Saulo Angelo/ZUMA/picture alliance

Since beginning his second term, Trump has taken action that aligns with those concerns, including dismantling public broadcasters like Voice of America and weaponizing government agencies against political opponents, including the Biden administration and other top US officials.

He also been accused of undermining judicial independence and weakening enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), which was originally passed to stop US citizens and entities from bribing foreign government officials to win contracts.

In an interview with DW, Valerian criticized Trump's use of an executive order to revise the FCPA and turn it into a national security tool. He also singled out the Republican president's support for cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin — often used for money-laundering — and a fast-track immigration program for wealthy foreigners, dubbed by critics the Trump Gold Card.

"Based on our international experience, such [visa] schemes attract corrupt people and may also attract criminals," he said.

Why is Europe's anti‑corruption drive stalling?


Over the same decade, the largest drop in perceived corruption in the West was in the UK. The country has fallen 11 points to 70, which Transparency International said was linked to ongoing failures to enforce ethical standards for ministers, lawmakers and other government officials.

It also cited COVID-19 procurement scandals, where people close to power were able to secure lucrative contracts to supply personal protective equipment (PPE) with little scrutiny.

Other Western nations to see large ranking drops over the past 10 years are New Zealand, down nine points to 81, Sweden, which dropped eight points to 80 and Canada, which fell seven points to 75. Germany's decline over the past 10 years is a more modest four points to 77. The country rose 2 points from last year.



The index recorded a four-point decline in France, falling to 66 over the past decade, citing falling corruption enforcement and growing risks of collusion between officials and private interests.

The report did hail the conviction of former French President Nicolas Sarkozy over the receipt of illicit funds, including from the late Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, which were used to help Sarkozy campaign for the presidency.

"Many [European] countries were leading the fight against corruption," Valerian lamented, noting that the EU's Anti-Corruption Directive has been watered down and won't allow Europe to "strengthen efforts against graft."


The index shows that more than two thirds of countries are failing to keep corruption under control
Image: Thomas Imo/photothek/picture alliance


Where else is momentum against corruption being lost?


The report noted that 50 countries have recorded significant drops in the rankings since 2012, notably Turkey, Hungary and Nicaragua, due to democratic backsliding, weak institutions and rule of law, cronyism and rent-seeking.

Corruption is increasingly opening the door for organized crime to penetrate Latin American politics, Transparency International warned, noting that even Costa Rica and Uruguay — long considered the region's strongest democracies with top CPI rankings — are now experiencing the kinds of corruption pressures seen in Colombia, Mexico, and Brazil.

The report said the declines are "sharp, enduring and difficult to reverse, as corruption becomes systemic and deeply embedded in both political and administrative structures."

Valerian expanded on this to DW: "The more concentrated your power is, the higher the abuse of power. And the more secretive your power is, the easier it is to abuse that power."

The new index doesn't reflect the latest tranche of Jeffrey Epstein files, released last month, which have implicated officials in several countries in alleged wrongdoing, corruption or compromising ties to the convicted pedophile.



The anti-corruption body also lamented political interference with the operations of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), especially those critical of the government of the day. The report noted an increase in crackdowns and funding cuts for NGOs in Georgia, Indonesia and Peru.

In certain countries, the report warned, it is becoming harder for independent journalists, civil society groups and whistleblowers to speak out against corruption.

Ukraine's anti‑graft push drew praise, even as the country continues to fight off Russian aggression. Recent defense‑sector scandals show that corruption remains a problem.

Yet the fact that these cases are surfacing publicly and moving to prosecution indicates that the country's new anti‑corruption framework is beginning to take hold, the report said.

"One country — Ukraine — has decided to fight against corruption, while Russia chose the opposite path," Valerian said, noting how Moscow had scrapped laws meant to prevent and punish graft.

Russia remains near the bottom of the CPI, scoring 22, while Ukraine's score was 36, a rise of 7 points over the past decade.

How do the lowest‑ranked countries fare?

Transparency International also noted that authoritarian regimes, including those in Venezuela and Azerbaijan, largely perform the worst in the rankings, as "corruption is systemic and manifests at every level."

In the latest index, more than two-thirds of nations fell below 50, which the report said indicated "serious corruption problems in most parts of the planet."

It noted that countries ranked under 25 are mostly affected by conflict and highly repressive regimes, including Libya, Yemen and Eritrea, which all scored 13, along with Somalia and South Sudan, which both scored nine.

On the positive side, the report highlighted how many countries have climbed from the bottom toward the middle of the ranking, including Albania, Angola, the Ivory Coast, Laos, Senegal, Ukraine and Uzbekistan.

It also noted long-term gains from nations with already high scores, including Estonia, South Korea, Bhutan and Seychelles.


Edited by: Ashutosh Pandey

Nik Martin is one of DW's team of business reporters.
US scores worst-ever result in corruption index as democracies backslide


Anti-graft watchdog Transparency International (TI) has warned that corruption is worsening in democracies worldwide and said the United States had fallen to its lowest-ever score on the 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index.



Issued on: 11/02/2026 - RFI

The Berlin-based TI said the global average score had fallen to its lowest level in more than a decade.

US President Donald Trump, since returning to the White House early last year, has upended domestic and foreign politics while ramping up pressure on institutions ranging from universities to the Federal Reserve.

Fed Chairman Jerome Powell is currently under investigation by Trump's Department of Justice after resisting pressure from the president to reduce interest rates.

TI raised concerns over "actions targeting independent voices and undermining judicial independence" in the US.

"The temporary freeze and weakening of enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act signal tolerance for corrupt business practices," the watchdog's research says.

The Trump administration's gutting of overseas aid has also "weakened global anti-corruption efforts", it added.

The group's index assigns a score between zero (highly corrupt) and 100 (very clean), based on data reflecting the assessments of experts and business executives.

Data sources have previously included the World Economic Forum and the Economist Intelligence Unit.

Global average lowest in a decade

Overall, the number of countries scoring above 80 has shrunk from 12 a decade ago to just five this year.

In particular, there is a worrying trend of democracies seeing worsening perceived corruption – from the United States (64), Canada (75) and New Zealand (81), to various parts of Europe, like the United Kingdom (70), France (66) and Sweden (80).

The global average score was 42, its lowest level in more than 10 years.

"The vast majority of countries are failing to keep corruption under control," the report said, with 122 countries out of 180 posting scores under 50.

The US case illustrates a trend in democracies experiencing a "decline in performance" in battling corruption, according to the report, a phenomenon it also said was apparent in the UK and France.

While such countries are still near the top of the index, "corruption risks have increased" due to weakening independent checks, gaps in legislation and inadequate enforcement.

"Several have also experienced strains to their democracies, including political polarisation and the growing influence of private money on decision-making," the report noted.

Protecting civic space

The report also pointed out that corruption tends to be tackled better in countries where civic space is guaranteed and protected.

"Those where the freedoms of expression, assembly and association are duly safeguarded are generally more resilient against corruption and score better on the CPI," the report said.

But countries where these freedoms are lacking are more likely to lose control of corruption: 36 of the 50 countries where the CPI scores have significantly declined have also seen a reduction in civic space.

Tens of thousands of Bulgarians filled Sofia's central square, demanding the government's resignation amid rising anger over corruption and contested economic policies, Sofia, Bulgaria, 10 December, 2025. © AP - Valentina Petrova

The worst-performing countries in the European Union were Bulgaria and Hungary, both scoring just 40.

The report said the government of Hungary's nationalist leader Viktor Orban, in power since 2010 and facing a tough battle for re-election in April, "has systematically weakened the rule of law, civic space and electoral integrity for over 10 years".

"This has enabled impunity for channelling billions – including from European Union funds – to groups of cronies through dirty public contracting and other methods," the report said.

The watchdog noted that the government of Prime Minister Robert Fico in neighbouring Slovakia, with a score of 48, is "weakening investigations of corruption and organised crime, especially those involving senior officials".

Denmark top of the class

The highest-ranked nation in the index for the eighth year running was Denmark with a score of 89.

Among the more positive stories of progress in the report was Ukraine, which scored 36.

The government of President Volodymyr Zelensky has faced widespread public anger over graft allegations against those close to him, even as the country is hammered by Russian attacks.

War veterans who lost their legs in Russia-Ukraine war hold signs saying "We fight for Ukraine, not for your impunity" during a protest against a law targeting anti-corruption institutions in central Kyiv, Ukraine, 23 July 2025. © Efrem Lukatsky / AP

However, TI noted that "the fact that these and many other scandals are being uncovered ... shows that Ukraine's new anti-corruption architecture is making a difference".

It hailed the "civil society mobilisation" last year, which prompted Zelensky to backtrack in an attempt to curb the independence of anti-graft bodies.

At the bottom of the index, the countries scoring below 25 are mostly conflict-affected and highly repressive countries, such as Venezuela (10) and the lowest scorers, Somalia and South Sudan, which both score nine.

(with AFP)


'Democracy loses out': France sinks to new low in annual global corruption index


France dropped to a historic low in a global corruption index released Tuesday in the wake of high-profile scandals involving former president Nicolas Sarkozy, far-right leader Marine Le Pen and a government cover-up of wrongdoing at the Perrier mineral water company.


Issued on: 10/02/2026 
FRANCE24
By: Joanna YORK


A view of the hemicycle at the National Assembly in Paris, France, on January 20, 2026. © Sarah Meyssonnier, Reuters

France dropped on Tuesday to an all-time low in Transparency International’s annual corruption perceptions index, with the organisation warning of “democratic danger” if politicians fail to act.

The Corruption Perceptions Index is compiled by experts and businesspeople who rank 182 countries on their perceived corruption levels in the public sector based on data from institutions including the World Bank and the World Economic Forum.

Countries score between zero, for those seen as highly corrupt, and 100, for those seen as very clean. In the 2025 edition released on Tuesday, Denmark ranked top with 89 points and South Sudan lowest with a score of 9.

France was given a score of 66 points, one point lower than 2024, and slipped down in the overall rankings to 27th place – its worst performance since the index, which was created in 1995, implemented its current methodology in 2012.

France’s poor score comes on the back of three high-profile corruption cases that dominated headlines last year.

A Senate report released in May found that the French government covered up consumer fraud by food giant Nestle, allowing the company to use prohibited treatments to produce "natural" mineral waters, including Perrier.

Ex-president Nicolas Sarkozy was imprisoned for 20 days in October after being found guilty of illegally seeking funding for his successful presidential campaign from former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.

And, in an ongoing scandal, far-right leader Marine Le Pen and others from her National Rally party were found guilty in March of embezzling European Parliament funds.

Le Pen appeared in a Paris court this week to appeal the verdict which, if upheld, will ban her for running in the 2027 presidential elections.


French far-right leader Marine Le Pen arrives for a hearing at the Paris courthouse on the Ile de la Cité on February 3, 2026. © Benoit Tessier, Reuters

'No political leadership'

These notable cases have “contributed to the deterioration in the perception of corruption”, said Florent Clouet, chief executive of Transparency International France.

But beyond the headline-grabbing scandals, the organisation has identified several key factors in France allowing an increase in the perception of corruption.

“The most significant problem, in our view, is the lack of political will – there is absolutely no political leadership in the fight against corruption,” Clouet said.

A recent plan to strengthen anti-corruption measures has not been championed by any MPs or presented at the weekly Council of Ministers chaired by President Emmanuel Macron, and accusations of corruption at the heart of government seem increasingly common.

Paris mayoral hopeful and current Culture Minister Rachida Dati is the latest in a series of serving ministers to face corruption charges.

France's culture minister Rachida Dati to be tried on corruption charges
La ministra de Cultura de Francia, Rachida Dati, durante la sesión en la Asamblea Nacional este 30 de junio de 2025. AFP - LUDOVIC MARIN
01:29



The lack of political support for anti-corruption measures is compounded by under-resourced investigation and prosecution bodies.

The National Financial Prosecutor's Office (Le parquet national financier) is overrun, with “each pair of magistrates ... dealing with 80 cases, when the original plan was for them to handle eight cases”, Clouet said.

There is also a chronic lack of personnel at leading financial investigation agencies the central anti-corruption office (l’Office central de lutte contre la corruption et les infractions financières et fiscales) and the High Authority for Transparency in Public Life.

“As a result, we find ourselves in a situation where, basically, they are unable to properly carry out the missions for which they were created,” Clouet said.

The president of the High Authority for Transparency in Public life in April called on the government to increase its budget, saying that of 13,000 declarations made by public officials in 2024, it only had capacity to verify 5,000.

While these organisations were set up to monitor high-ranking officials and public servants, an additional issue is the lack of oversight at lower levels of government.

“There is great difficulty detecting and combating what is known as 'low-intensity corruption', involving relatively small amounts of money that slip under the radar of prevention and detection mechanisms,” Clouet added.
A ‘worrying trend’

Rather than being an outlier, Transparency International found the issues in France are part of a “worrying trend” of “backsliding scores in traditionally well-performing democracies” including CanadaNew ZealandSweden and the UK.

Globally, more than two thirds of all countries surveyed received a score lower than 50 and “the vast majority of countries are failing to keep corruption under control", the report found.

Over the past decade, progress has “stalled” in Western Europe and “been deteriorating” in the US, which dropped to a new low of 64, it added.

Indeed, US President Donald Trump’s dismantling of decades-old measures to fight corruption seem to have inspired other countries to loosen their own laws.

“In the current geopolitical climate, Europe should be raising, not lowering, its anti-corruption ambitions. Corruption is not inevitable,” said Flora Cresswell, regional adviser for Western Europe at Transparency International.

But “that's not what's happening. Europe tends to follow the United States’ lead,” Clouet said.

The degradation in the public's perception of corruption comes with serious consequences, he warned, causing disenchanted citizens "to abstain from politics" as well as driving "social anger, which can fuel illiberal political forces. In all cases, it's democracy that really loses out.”

A survey released on Monday by the Cevipof research institute found that just 22 percent of people in France say they have confidence in politics – a four percent drop on the previous year.

Olympics T-shirt marking 1936 Berlin Games raises eyebrows

DW
February 11, 2026



T-shirts on the Olympics online store commemorating past venues include one for the 1936 Games in Berlin. Nazi Germany hosted both the Winter and Summer Olympics that year, as it was starting to ramp up its repression



The T-shirt uses artwork that has been used in the past to commemorate the event
Image: Screenshot shop.olympics.com


A commemorative T-shirt on the Olympics online store marking the 1936 Games in Berlin under Adolf Hitler's National Socialist, or Nazi, government caught the eye of German media on Wednesday.

The shirt shows a man wearing a laurel wreath, the quadriga chariot drawn by four horses atop the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin and core details like the dates and location of the Summer Games in the capital.

It's part of a collection of shirts for each of the modern-era Games, but, nonetheless, references probably the most politically contentious ones.

There are no references to Hitler's government or its symbols and iconography on the shirt
.
Propaganda chief Joseph Goebbels used the 1936 Games to broadcast images of Nazi iconography to the worldImage: United Archives/kpa Keystone/IMAGO
Early TV and radio-era games, first Olympic torch relay

The Games had already been awarded to Germany before the Nazis came to power, but hosting both the winter and summer events in 1936 provided Hitler's regime with a stage to showcase the government and country internationally.

ADVERTISEMENT


Technological advancements like television and radio enabled the propaganda-reliant regime to double down on these efforts, with Joseph Goebbels paying particular attention to the event.

The 1936 Games included the first Olympic torch relay of the modern era, a fact that the International Olympic Committee (IOC) commemorated online in 2020 to considerable public backlash because it used Nazi propaganda footage to recall the event.

The first Olympic torch relay of the modern era culminated in Berlin's Olympic Stadium on August 1, 1936
Image: akg-images/picture-alliance

Berlin Games took place as repression was starting to scale up

The Nazis tried to put a respectable foot forward for the event, removing antisemitic slogans and graffiti from Berlin's streets and shop windows, moving those it deemed "undesirables" out of the capital, and toning down the rhetoric in its racist newspaper Der Stürmer.

But, nevertheless, the first signs of the coming Holocaust and of Hitler's ambitions for wars of conquest were starting to materialize for those watching Germany closely.

In the run-up to the Berlin Olympics in 1936, Nazi Germany remilitarized the Rhineland area on its western border, which its forces had been ordered to vacate after defeat in World War I. It implemented the "four-year plan" designed to prepare the economy and the military for war.

It stripped Roma and Jews of their voting rights that March, a month after the Winter Games in Garmisch-Partenkirchen. The leader of the SS black shirts, Heinrich Himmler, was named the chief of German police a few weeks before the summer's Berlin Games.

Internationally, Hitler's government signed its first treaties with future "Axis" allies Japan and Italy in 1936, and provided support to the nationalists under General Francisco Franco in Spain's civil war.

Black US athlete Jesse Owens' four gold medals, including in the coveted 100 meters sprint, became the biggest story from the Games, much to Hitler's distaste
Image: akg-images/picture alliance

Only a partial propaganda success for Hitler

The event did not prove satisfactory for Hitler.

Although Germany led the overall medal tally, the United States dominated some of the highest-profile track-and-field events at the Olympic Stadium in Berlin.

Hitler had wanted to attend and award all German winners with their gold medals, but only the German winners. He was reprimanded by the IOC when he left the stadium to avoid shaking the hand of high jumper Cornelius Johnson as he won the first US gold medal.

The head of the IOC at the time told Hitler he could either congratulate all the gold medalists, or none, so the dictator elected to honor none for the remainder of the Games.

This meant that Hitler never shook the hand of the most successful athlete of the Games, 22-year-old Black US athlete Jesse Owens, who won gold in the 100 meters, 200 meters, the 4x100-meter relay and the long jump.



Edited by: Sean Sinico

Mark Hallam News and current affairs writer and editor with DW since 2006.
Slovakia's embattled LGBTQ+ community hopes for change

Rob Cameron in Bratislava
DW 
February 10, 2026

New restrictive legislation in Slovakia comes despite rising public acceptance of same-sex couples, making the situation for the LGBTQ+ community complex and contradictory.



Last year's constitutional change is just one of many challenges faced by the LGBTQ+ community in Slovakia
Image: Robert Poorten/imageBROKER/picture alliance

Life for Slovakia's LGBTQ+ community has become more complicated under the government of Prime Minister Robert Fico.

Last fall, for example, Slovakia's parliament narrowly voted to change the country's constitution, recognizing only two sexes — male and female — and restricting adoption to married heterosexual couples.

What impact do these kind of legal changes have on same-sex couples in their everyday lives?

DW asked lawyer Ivan Novotny when the last time his use of the phrase "my husband" had raised eyebrows in Slovakia.

Sitting in the flat in central Bratislava he shares with his husband Metod Spacek, also a lawyer, and their young son, Ivan remembered one specific incident — amusing now, but not at the time.

Ivan Novotny (left) and Metod Spacek (right) were legally married in Austria and now live in Slovakia
Image: Rob Cameron

"Metod had lost consciousness, so I called the emergency services," explained Ivan. "The guy picked up and said 'What's your emergency?' And I said 'My husband's lost consciousness! He's on the ground, what am I supposed to do?'"

"And the guy said, 'Your what?' I answered: 'My husband, he's not breathing!' And he was like: 'Your manager?' Because it's a very similar word in Slovak: manzel and manazer," Ivan recounted.

"I said 'What? Not my manazer. Manzel.' And he was like 'Huh. Is that even allowed?'"

"I was very angry, worried and scared, and he was just talking about that," Ivan told DW.
Same-sex marriages not officially recognized

Metod soon came round and was fine, but the situation could have been far more serious.

The couple said they had a more positive experience a few years ago during the COVID-19 pandemic, when Ivan had to visit Metod in hospital and was allowed into his room, despite visits being limited to family only.


Ivan and Metod are legally married. Although they wed across the border in Austria — which, like Slovakia, is a member of the EU — their marriage is not officially recognized in Slovakia.

Both men are international lawyers with many years of service in the state administration.
Legal status: it's complicated

"We are faced with many, many questions, " Metod Spacek told DW. "People say 'all right, but your marriage is not valid in Slovakia,' And we say, 'No, no, this is not true.'"

While Slovakia does not recognize the institution of same-sex marriage, under a recent European Court of Justice decision, all EU states must recognize the consequences of a legal marriage in another EU country, he explained.


The couple's official status will become increasingly relevant once their young son starts school. For now, the chatter in their kitchen is typical of most married couples: Who's making dinner? Can you pick up the kid from daycare? Do we need more capsules for the espresso machine?

'A great dam against progressivism'

Slovakia's LGBTQ+ community faces a host of challenges. Last year's constitutional change — which shut the door on gay couples marrying and adopting — was just the latest blow.

Slovakia does not recognize same-sex marriage. Civil unions, whether for same-sex or heterosexual couples, do not exist at all under Slovak law.

The Fico government described the constitutional amendment as enshrining "sovereignty in cultural and ethical matters."

Critics, including Amnesty International, warned the legal change would bring the country's legal system closer to that of Hungary's illiberal government or Vladimir Putin's Russia.

People marched in support of the LGBTQ+ community two days after a teenage gunman shot dead two people at a gay bar in downtown Slovakia in 2022Image: VLADIMIR SIMICEK/AFP via Getty Images

The Fico government described the amendment as "a great dam against progressivism" to protect Slovakia against the liberal ideology that was "spreading like cancer."
A complex, contradictory reality

In 2022, two people were killed and one injured when a young man who had been radicalized on neo-Nazi chat forums opened fire outside a gay bar in Zamocka Street beneath Bratislava Castle.

Anti-LGBTQ+ narratives have become more common in the public discourse. And yet public acceptance of same-sex couples is rising, leaving the community to live amid a contradictory reality.

"The worst impact of the constitutional change was that it took away hopes for the future. It effectively cemented the current bad situation," said Martin Macko of the Bratislava-based NGO Inakost (Otherness), which offers counseling and support to LGBTQ+ people.

"At the same time, public attitudes are slowly improving. More people personally know someone who is LGBTI+, which increases acceptance. Support for registered partnerships and marriage is rising," said Macko, whose organization uses the acronym LGBTI+.

"This change is slow, but awareness is gradually increasing," he told DW.
Aggressive rhetoric taints public perception

Macko said his organization's current struggle is both legal and financial: The government has slashed grants to Inakost, he said, because it received financial support from the US.

"The government's rhetoric, which is very aggressive toward the LGBTI+ community, has a negative impact both on how people outside the community see LGBTI+ people, and on how LGBTI+ people see themselves," said Kristina Kasanova, a psychologist at Inakost.


Public attitudes to the LGBTQ+ community are slowly improving, says Martin Macko of the Bratislava-based NGO Inakost. Pictured here: a protest in support of the LGBTQ+ community in 2022Image: VLADIMIR SIMICEK/AFP via Getty Images

"Many people feel ashamed of being queer. They don't want to belong to the community, and self-acceptance is very difficult for them."

"Even within the community, there are tensions. People sometimes develop negative feelings toward one another because certain issues are more visible than others. Some would prefer to be less visible, to keep a low profile," she said.

"As a result, some people end up blaming others, for example, saying they don't want to go to Pride events because people are 'too visible', and that this visibility is the reason they are facing hatred. That is, of course, not true. This is a form of internalized homophobia."

Like Ivan and Metod, Martin Macko and his colleagues at Inakost see legal challenges as offering scope for some optimism. At present there are cases waiting to be seen by both Slovakia's Constitutional Court and European courts. The hope is that legal change would open the way to people living freer, more socially accepted everyday lives.

Edited by: Aingeal Flanagan

Rob Cameron Journalist covering the Czech Republic and Slovakia.