Saturday, May 16, 2026

 Thousands march in London for far-right, pro-Palestine protests


Police are patrolling the streets of London as thousands of protesters march in the UK capital on Saturday for two major demonstrations, the annual march to commemorate the Palestinian Nakba and a rally staged by British far-right activist Tommy Robinson.


Issued on: 16/05/2026 -
By: FRANCE 24 

Police forces stand in front of the far right Unite the Kingdom march in London on May 16, 2026. © Kirsty Wigglesworth, AP

Thousands of people began rallying in London Saturday at a march organised by far-right activist Tommy Robinson and a counter-demonstration fused with a pro-Palestinian protest, amid a huge police presence.

London's Metropolitan Police said ahead of the duelling events that it would mount one of its largest operations in recent years, as the British capital also hosts the FA Cup Final.

The force was set to deploy 4,000 officers – alongside horses, dogs, drones and helicopters – to manage Robinson's so-called "Unite the Kingdom" march and the rival rally marking Nakba Day.

That commemorates the 1948 displacement of Palestinians during the creation of Israel. It will combine with an anti-fascism march organised by the Stand Up to Racism group.


UK: Far-right rally meets pro-palestine counter-protest in London
© France 24
04:10



The Met police estimated 30,000 people would attend that event, setting off from west London, while 50,000 would be at the "Unite the Kingdom" march starting from Holborn in the heart of the capital.

Natasha, 44, was among those who had travelled in for Robinson's rally, wearing a bucket hat in the colours of Britain's Union Jack and draped in the flag.

"It's nice to be around my own culture," she told AFP near its start-point, calling the event "patriotic" and insisting "there's nothing racist about it".

Union Jack-wielding Justin, 56, from Essex, who declined to give his last name, echoed the sentiment. He said attendees were protesting "a whole load of stuff".

"Obviously immigration is a big part of it," he noted.


'Christian values'


Across London, Simon Ralls, 62, from Nottingham in central England, had turned out for the combined pro-Palestine and Stand Up to Racism event.

"The right (wing) are emboldened – we're here to try and counter that, make sure people aren't ignorant," he told AFP ahead of marching into the city centre.

Robinson – whose real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon – is a former football hooligan turned anti-Islam activist whose profile has soared in recent years, in particular online.

Last September, he drew up to 150,000 people into central London for a similarly themed rally proclaiming "national unity, free speech and Christian values" – an unprecedented turnout for an event organised by a far-right figure.

He has tapped into growing public anger over tens of thousands of migrants crossing the English Channel each year in small boats, wider immigration policies, alleged free speech curbs and other issues.

X owner Elon Musk addressed that gathering via video-link. The rally shocked mainstream Britain for its scale and raw messaging, as well as clashes between some participants and police which injured dozens of officers.

The Met has imposed various conditions on Saturday's two rallies, over their routes and timings, in a bid to keep rival attendees apart.

The force, which estimates the operation will cost £4.5 million ($6 million), warned it would adopt "a zero-tolerance approach".

That includes for the first time making organisers legally responsible for ensuring invited speakers do not break hate speech laws.

Officers arrested two men Saturday morning arriving for the Robinson rally who were wanted on suspicion of grievous bodily harm following an incident in Birmingham, central England, when "a man was run over". No further details were provided.

'Hatred and division'

Prime Minister Keir Starmer warned Friday that "anyone who sets out to wreak havoc on our streets, to intimidate or threaten anyone ... can expect to face the full force of the law".

He accused the organisers of Robinson's rally of "peddling hatred and division".
'Violence, hoolig
anism, fraud: Far-right populist Nigel Farage regards Tommy Robinson as too fringe'

© France 24
08:06



Robinson has urged his attendees not to wear masks or drink excessive alcohol, and to be "peaceful and courteous".

Police have voiced fears about football hooligan groups which have previously supported Robinson showing up.

Meanwhile the FA Cup Final between Chelsea and Manchester City kicking off at 4 pm (1500 GMT) could strain the policing operation.

The Met has said live facial recognition would be used for the first time to police a protest.

Meanwhile, the government blocked 11 "foreign far-right agitators" from entering Britain for Robinson's rally.

They include US-based "extremist" Valentina Gomez, who the government said is "known for using inflammatory and dehumanising rhetoric about Muslim communities".

Saturday's rival demonstrations follow a spate of violent attacks targeting London's Jewish community, with some blaming instances of hate speech at pro-Palestinian marches for helping to fuel antisemitism.

The UK's terrorism threat level was raised two weeks ago to the second-highest level of "severe", with security officials citing the "broader Islamist and extreme right-wing terrorist threat".

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)



MEP and far-right influencers barred from UK rally: Who are they and what was the reason?

Demonstrator stands on head of lion on the side of the Westminster Bridge, during a Tommy Robinson-led Unite the Kingdom march and rally in London, 13 September 2025.
Copyright AP Photo


By Estelle Nilsson-Julien
Published on 

The UK government barred seven indivdiuals from entering the UK, stating that their presence is "not conducive to the public good". But on what grounds and what does this decision mean in practice?

At least seven individuals — including multiple figures with ties to Europe's far-right — have been barred from attending a rally organised by far-right activist Tommy Robinson in central London on 16 May.

A number of those barred by British authorities were set to address crowds at the "Unite the Kingdom" march, but the Home Office declined their electronic travel authorisation (ETA), a system brought in earlier in 2026 that, once granted, allows visa-exempt foreign nationals to visit the UK multiple times over a period of two years.

Shabana Mahmood, the home secretary, said that they were banned because their presence in the UK is "not conducive to the public good".

Eva Vlaardingerbroek and Ada Lluch, influencers and commentators from the Netherlands and Spain, respectively, as well as Flemish MP Filip Dewinter and Polish MEP Dominik Tarczyński, shared news of their reported bans on social media, along with screenshots notifying them of the decisions.

The Metropolitan police has warned organisers of the rally that they will be held responsible if speakers spread hate speech during the event, which attracted more than 100,000 attendees last year and led to 25 arrests and two dozen injured officers.

According to the force, the 2026 event is set to mark "one of the busiest days for policing in London in recent years", coinciding with a demonstration in solidarity with the Palestinian Nakba Day and the FA Cup Final at Wembley Stadium.

A heated response

Several US figures say they have also been denied entry to the UK, including commentator Joey Mannarino and MAGA influencer Valentina Gomez, who spoke at last year's rally.

While British Prime Minister Keir Starmer did not reveal the identity of the individuals who had been banned, he described them as "far-right agitators."

In a statement shared on 15 May, he stated that his government would not stand in the way of peaceful protest, but that it would "ban those coming into the UK" to stir up violence.

In another speech made on 11 May, he said, "We will not allow people to come to the UK, threaten our communities, and spread hate on our streets."

The decision to ban speakers from attending this year's edition has paved the way to online speculation and debate, with many arguing that the move is an affront to freedom of speech and an individual's right to criticise migration policies.

Taking to X, Tommy Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon and who has multiple criminal convictions, stated that the UK government was "banning Americans en masse" from entry to the country.

Robinson contrasted the ban with the fact that "thousands" of so-called "invaders" are "chaperoned in every week and put up in hotels!", making an inflammatory reference to immigrants and asylum seekers.

He has long been a critic of Starmer's immigration policy and has repeatedly spread false claims and conspiracy theories about migrants and Muslims in the UK.

Who are the banned individuals and what have they said?

Tarczyński, an MEP from the European Conservatives and Reformists Group, has vowed to "sue" Keir Starmer in response to his ban should the prime minister ever leave office.

"Not the government, not the Home Office, but Starmer personally", he said on X on 12 May.

Tarczyński is known for his staunch anti-immigration stance as well as controversial statements, including that Poland should not take in a single Muslim immigrant.

In 2019, he stated, "We don't want Poland being taken over by Muslims, Buddhists, or someone else…"

"For me, multicultural society, it’s not a value," he added. "Christian culture, Roman law, Greek philosophers, these are the virtues for us."

Ada Lluch is a 26-year-old Catalan activist and influencer, who has attracted controversy for nationalist and anti-immigration views, having previously made controversial statements about Spain being "better off" under Spanish dictator Francisco Franco in posts shared on X in 2024, as reported by El País.

Following the ban, Lluch wrote on X: "One of the reasons Keir Starmer said he banned us from entering the UK is because we don't bring solutions to the problems. I think the solution is obvious: WE WANT REMIGRATION. AND WE WANT IT NOW!"

"Remigration" is a slogan frequently employed by parts of Europe's far-right. Proponents say that it's a form of immigration control in response to rising migration levels, but critics, including human rights groups and legal experts, have described it as discriminatory and racist.

The US-based non-profit Global Project Against Hate and Extremism describes it as a "white supremacist policy concept" that calls for the mass forced removal of immigrants, refugees, and their descendants based on race, ethnicity, culture, being perceived as "non-white," or a failure to "assimilate".

The concept has been linked by researchers to the far-right "Great Replacement" theory, which suggests that Western civilisation is threatened with an irreversible decline, due to falling birth rates and an influx of migrants from the Middle East and North Africa.

Tommy Robinson speaks during the Unite the Kingdom march and rally, London, 13 September 2025 Joanna Chan/Copyright 2025 The AP. All rights reserved


Dutch political commentator Eva Vlaardingerbroek has previously declared: "They are demanding the sacrifice of our children on the altar of mass migration. Let's not beat about the bush — this is the rape, replacement and murder of our people … Remigration is possible, and it’s up to us to make it happen."

Vlaardingerbroek was first notified that her ETA had been withdrawn in January, days after she accused Starmer of allowing "the ongoing rape and killing of British girls by migrant rape gangs".

Flemish MP Filip Dewinter, who qualified Starmer's government as "communist", was embroiled in controversy in 2015, after he shared an X post which stated that the word "racist" was no longer an insult but had become a "title of honour."

Dewinter included the hashtag #ikbenracistendaarbenikfierop in the post, which translates as "I am a racist and proud of it" — before deleting it.

In her speech made at last year's event, 26-year-old Colombian-American influencer Valentina Gomez told the crowd that "rapist Muslims" were "taking over" the UK.

"England, they took your guns, they took your swords, and they raped your women," she said. "You have nothing else to lose, but there's still hope. You are still the majority. So you either fight for this nation or you let all of these rapist Muslims and corrupt politicians take over."

Gomez has repeatedly made anti-Muslim statements, sharing an X video depicting her burning a Quran in August 2025, stating, "your daughters will be raped, and your sons beheaded — unless we put an end to Islam once and for all."

Why have the far-right commentators been banned?

While the Home Office did not confirm why any of the individuals have been banned from the UK, we can look at the country's existing rules to see what kind of behaviour constitutes a refusal.

The UK government can refuse entry for a wide range of reasons, from past criminal convictions, visa violations or, as in this instance, due to their presence not being "conducive to the public good." This was the reason cited by Home Secretary Mahmood.

Contrary to online claims, refusing entry on these grounds is not exclusive to Starmer's current Labour government.

According to a research briefing published by the House of Commons library, past successive Conservative governments have predominantly used visa bans to bar extremists and "hate preachers" from entry, with a focus on Islamist figures accused of supporting terrorism or sectarian violence.

However, other kinds of individuals were also banned under the Conservatives. For instance, in 2013, the UK's then-home secretary, Theresa May, banned two US bloggers, Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, from entering the country, citing their stance against Islam.

Between May 2010 and December 2022, successive home secretaries under the Conservatives ordered the exclusion of 369 people from the UK, averaging approximately 30 cases per year, according to annual reports on the use of anti-terrorism powers.

Therefore, claims portraying the policy as unique to Starmer's Labour government — which came into power in July 2024 — are misleading, as such measures were already in place under previous Conservative prime ministers.

According to the "Counter-terrorism disruptive powers report", 15 individuals were excluded from the UK in 2024, because their presence in the UK was considered not conducive to the public good.

Across social media, those opposing the visa ban have claimed that freedom of speech is no longer protected in the UK.

However, UK law stipulates that freedom of speech is protected under Article 10 of the Human Rights Act 1998, which incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights. Nevertheless, it also explicitly allows governments to limit free speech to prevent crime or for national security matters.

The 1986 Public Order Act, amended by the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006, criminalises rhetoric which incites racial or religious hatred. This includes using "threatening" words or behaviour, or distributing material which intends to stir up religious hatred.

People demonstrate during the Tommy Robinson-led Unite the Kingdom march and rally, London, 13 September 2025 Joanna Chan/Copyright 2025 The AP. All rights reserved

Tommy Robinson, a divisive figure

While Robinson has taken to X to urge participants at the 2026 rally to engage in peaceful protest, he has previously faced repeated criticism for his rhetoric, notably using the term "invaders" to refer to asylum seekers

Separately, he has spread misinformation about migrant communities, for instance, sharing false claims about the perpetrator of the July 2024 Southport attacks.

He alleged that the attacker who killed three girls in a Taylor Swift-themed dance class was a Muslim asylum seeker who had just arrived in the UK on a small boat.

In reality, the 17-year-old perpetrator was born in Cardiff, Wales, to Rwandan parents and had no known connection to Islam. False claims about the suspect helped fuel mass rioting and marked the largest flare-up in violence in England since the 2011 riots.

At last year's edition of the rally, a video address by tech billionaire Elon Musk, who has also routinely amplified hardline criticism of Starmer's stance on immigration, was condemned by Downing Street, after he told the crowd "violence is coming" and "you either fight back or you die".

Successive British governments have repeatedly struggled to reduce net migration, but the tide appears to be turning: during Labour's first year in office, migration to the UK fell by more than two-thirds in the year ending June 2025 — the lowest annual figure since 2021, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

The UK's 204,000 net migration figure sharply contrasts with the recorded peak of 944,000 in the year ending March 2023, under the previous Conservative government. This roughly 80% fall was mainly driven by fewer arrivals for work and study reasons, according to the ONS.

A 2025 study by the Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford states that it's difficult to compare conviction and incarceration rates among British and non-British citizens because there are no reliable statistics on the size of the population.

However, the available statistics do reveal some trends. For example, young adults are more likely to commit crimes regardless of nationality; when controlled for age or sex, non-UK citizens are underrepresented in the prison population; and non-Brits are overrepresented among offenders for drug offences, but underrepresented for robbery or physical violence, according to the study.




BEANCOUNTERS/comptable

Louvre security concerns ‘pushed aside’ in favour of prestige projects

Security concerns at the Louvre were repeatedly sidelined in favour of prestige projects and rising visitor numbers, according to a parliamentary report to be presented on Thursday which calls for sweeping reforms in France’s museum sector.


Issued on: 14/05/2026 - 08:13
2 minReading time
Workers install iron window guards at the Galerie d'Apollon of the Louvre Museum on 23 December, 2025, a few weeks after thieves used a furniture lift to break into the museum. AFP - DIMITAR DILKOFF

By:RFI
ADVERTISING


The report, compiled by Green MP Alexis Corbière, follows a parliamentary inquiry launched after the spectacular burglary at the Louvre on 19 October last year, when royal jewels worth an estimated €88 million were stolen in broad daylight.

The theft exposed major security shortcomings at the museum, which attracts 9 million visitors a year.

The inquiry committee, chaired by conservative MP Alexandre Portier, conducted around 20 hearings and round-table discussions, interviewing more than 100 people and carrying out visits in France and abroad before finalising its conclusions.

Corbière argues in the report that “safety and security issues” were “pushed into the background, behind objectives of prestige and influence, which were treated as priorities”.





His findings echo earlier criticism from the French Court of Auditors and an administrative inquiry published in late 2025.

The report says warnings about outdated security systems had been raised in previous audits, including a 2017 review and another conducted by jeweller Van Cleef & Arpels in 2019.

Despite this, implementation of the Louvre’s security equipment master plan reportedly fell more than two years behind schedule.

French auditors slam Louvre bosses over lavish spending, weak security
More transparent leadership

A central theme of the report is the governance of major French cultural institutions. Corbière accuses the Ministry of Culture of failing to exercise proper oversight of management decisions at the Louvre and other museums.

According to the report, part of the problem lies in the current appointment system, under which museum directors are chosen by presidential decree from the Elysée Palace.

Corbière proposes replacing that system with a more transparent process in which directors would be elected by boards that include parliamentarians and other representatives.

He says such reforms would help move France away from what he describes as a culture of presidential “high-handedness”.

The criticism also extends to the tenure of former Louvre president Laurence Des Cars, who led the institution from 2021 until February this year, when she was replaced by Christophe Leribault.

Corbière insists that security issues were “not a priority” for the previous management, despite their denials.

Fourth suspected Louvre thief remanded as €88m jewels remain missing
Doubts over expansion

Among the report’s 40 recommendations is a call for increased funding for the museum security fund, established after the burglary by former culture minister Rachida Dati.

The fund currently has a budget of €30 million, but the report argues that more investment is needed to modernise security systems across France’s museums.

It also calls for a major expansion of the Ministry of Culture’s Security, Safety and Audit Unit, noting that only three full-time staff currently oversee security monitoring for more than 1,200 museums across the country.

Other proposals include recruiting more permanent security officers, reducing reliance on contract workers and improving pay in an effort to make the profession more attractive.

The report additionally questions the “Louvre Nouvelle Renaissance” project announced in 2025 by President Emmanuel Macron. This initiative includes major renovations and plans for a new dedicated space for the Mona Lisa, alongside ambitions to increase annual attendance to up to 15 million visitors.

Corbière argues that such targets risk worsening overcrowding and placing further strain on both the historic building and the museum staff.

Nonetheless, supporters of the inquiry say the scandal has created an opportunity to modernise the management and protection of France’s museums – with the Louvre now under intense pressure to restore public confidence.

(with newswires)

Ghana to repatriate 300 citizens after xenophobic incidents in South Africa

Ghana has announced it will evacuate 300 of its citizens from South Africa, following a spate of xenophobic incidents and protests against immigration across the country in recent weeks.


Issued on: 14/05/2026 - RFI



A march calling for stronger government action against illegal immigration in Pretoria, 28 April, 2026. © Ihsaan Haffejee / REUTERS

Ghana's Foreign Minister Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa said on Tuesday that President John Dramani Mahama had approved the operation.

"These distressed Ghanaians had earlier complied with the Foreign Ministry's advisory and registered with our High Commission in Pretoria to be rescued, following the latest wave of xenophobic attacks," he wrote in a message posted on social media platform X (formerly Twitter).

"The Government of Ghana shall continue to safeguard the welfare of all Ghanaians home and abroad."

The decision comes after a series of anti-immigration protests in South Africa, as well as claims of assaults and intimidation against other African nationals across the country in recent weeks.

Nigeria and Ghana have both voiced concern over the situation.

The South African government, however, has rejected all claims of xenophobia.

"South Africans are not xenophobic," presidential spokesman Vincent Magwenya told reporters last week. "What you have is pockets of protest, which is permissible within our constitutional framework."


Magwenya said Africa needs to address conflict, instability and cases of "misgovernment" that were behind waves of migration across the continent.

At the end of last month, the government in Accra summoned South Africa's high commissioner in protest at several xenophobic incidents targeting Ghanaians.

South Africa is Africa's leading economy and home to more than 3 million foreigners – who male up 5 percent of the population.

But unemployment is running at 30 percent, fuelling tensions over migrant workers.

In the worst violence against immigrants in the last two decades, 62 people were killed in 2008. Violent clashes also erupted in 2015, 2016 and 2019.

(with AFP)



'World's oldest dog' contender dies in France aged 30

Villy-le-Pelloux (France) (AFP) – A French toy spaniel named Lazare thought to have been "the world's oldest dog" has died aged 30, his carer said on Friday.

Issued on: 15/05/2026 - RFI

Lazare was 30 years and five months old © Jeff PACHOUD / AFP

AFP contacted the Guinness World Records to find out if Lazare had held the record before he passed away on Thursday, but did not receive an immediate response.

Lazare, a Papillon dwarf spaniel with stand-up "butterfly" ears, was born on December 4, 1995, according to animal charity worker Anne-Sophie Moyon.

He spent most of his life with the same owner until she died and he was then handed to the charity's shelter.

Single mother Ophelie Boudol, 29, fell in love with the animal one year her senior at the shelter last month.

She had initially intended to find a pet for her mother, she told AFP, but she invited Lazare to join her family instead.

Lazare died just weeks later.

"You were our little grandpa baby," Boudol wrote in a farewell post on Instagram.

"You chose to take your final flight in my arms on the evening of 14 May, to join your mistress who loved you so much," she said.

Ophelie Boudol, 29, fell in love with Lazare last month © Jeff PACHOUD / AFP

At 30 years and five months old, Lazare wore nappies, could no longer hear or see, and slept almost all day.

But Boudol said he was delightfully spirited.

"He really has such an endearing personality," she told AFP earlier this week as she cradled him at her home in the southeastern town of Villy-le-Pelloux.

When Moyon and colleagues discovered Lazare's age, they thought "Lazare might be the world's oldest dog", she said.

They verified his birth date in two registries, and filled in the paperwork to register him for a possible record as a joke, she added.

A Portuguese Rafeiro do Alentejo named Bobi was thought to be the oldest dog when he died reportedly aged 31 in 2023, according to the Guinness World Records website.

But a review in 2024 found there was not enough conclusive evidence of his age.
FRANCE NEEDS A NEW WAVE

France has 'responsibility' to break glass ceiling for women in film

Only five directors out of 22 at this year's Cannes Film Festival are women – two fewer than in 2025. Campaigners who want to see the film industry become more inclusive say the numbers reflect a broader gender gap in French cinema.


Issued on: 15/05/2026 - RFI

Actor Eye Haidara speaks at the opening ceremony of the 79th Cannes Film Festival, 12 May 2026. © Scott A Garfitt/Invision/AP

By: Ollia Horton


There are five women in the official competition at Cannes this year, three from France, one from Germany and one from Austria – representing 23 percent of the 22 films vying for the Palme d’Or prize.

It is progress compared to the average of 3 percent of women directors competing from 1946 to 1980, and 12 percent between 2011 and 2020.

This average went up to 25 percent between 2021 and 2025, with a record year in 2023, when six women were selected – 33 percent of the total.

Women are better represented in other categories at the festival, notably Un Certain Regard, where films by female directors from around the world make up 60 percent of the selection this year.

These categories are looking for new talent and are more daring in terms of format, but ultimately have smaller budgets, says French organisation Collectif 50/50.

The independent group produces regular industry reports in a bid to monitor and promote equality in the film and audiovisual industry, as well as greater visibility for minority groups in general.

Fanny de Casimacker, the collective's director, has been tracking the representation of women at film festivals for a number of years and while she acknowledges progress is being made, she says there is more to be done.


Responsibility to lead


"The goal ideally is to have 50 percent women in the official competition, where the power and the greatest recognition lie," she tells RFI.

The Cannes Film Festival provides a global platform to foreground issues in the industry and beyond, from gender parity to discrimination and abuse.

As one of Europe’s biggest film-producing countries, France must continue to be a leader in equality and inclusiveness, she says.

"I think it's a responsibility, when you're a major industry, to be at the forefront of social issues."

Members of the jury pose on stage during the Opening Ceremony of the 79th edition of the Cannes Film Festival in Cannes, southern France, on 12 May 2026. AFP - ANTONIN THUILLIER


Festival director Thierry Frémaux weighed in on the question in his opening press conference on Monday, dismissing the idea of mandating the inclusion of a certain number of women directors.

"Under no circumstances should there be a quota policy," he insisted, stating that festival organisers nonetheless aim for parity in "the juries and governing bodies".

This is thanks to a charter signed between Collectif 50/50 and the Cannes Film Festival in 2018 to promote greater transparency and inclusion in the wake of the #MeToo movement.

This year, the jury consists of four women and five men.

The festival director acknowledged that progress remains insufficient. "The figures show that it's progressing, but it's slow, it's not enough," Frémaux said, adding a broader discussion on the role of women in cinema was needed.



Progress stalling


De Casimacker acknowledges "significant progress" has been made since the Harvey Weinstein scandal in 2017 drew global outrage over sexual violence and prompted wider reflection on women's position in the film industry.

Though cases could still be better managed, she says, there is "a greater willingness to listen, both from institutions and from the profession itself".

But when it comes to the number of women making films, de Casimacker admits "things have lost momentum".

What is worrying, she says, is that the gender parity which has existed in film schools for several years should be reflected in the industry by now, but "that's not the case".

In the Collectif’s latest report, which looks at the 206 films produced in France in 2025, data shows that only 33 percent of directors are women, 31 percent of screenwriters and 15 percent of directors of photography.

There is also a clear divide when it comes to the budgets allocated to women filmmakers, and the representation of women in technical and production roles.


French director Justine Triet, left, with actor Sandra Hueller on the set of the film "Anatomy of a Fall". © Neon via AP

Women continue to remain notably dominant in certain sectors, such as costume designers (90 percent) and casting directors (71 percent), for example, but are conspicuously absent in special effects (11 percent) and sound mixing (9 percent).

De Casimacker explains that often the professions dominated by women are those that are given specific, limited remits on set – like editing, which takes place behind the scenes.

When there are bigger budgets, there is a large pay gap. Even if female costume designers are indeed the vast majority, in the French film industry, their male counterparts are paid more.

"This worries us because we feel that we should redouble our efforts in raising awareness and addressing these inequalities," de Casimacker says.

"Right now, we have the impression that there has perhaps even been a lack of interest in these issues, even though we are very, very far from achieving any form of parity in the industry."


Since January 2019, the National Centre for Cinema (CNC) has implemented a "parity bonus", a 15 percent film funding incentive for productions that hire women in multiple key roles, in collaboration with Collectif 50/50.

However, the collective has noted a stagnation since 2022: only about 35 percent of films qualify each year.

De Casimacker warns that economic pressures hang over the international film industry as a whole, which could spell setbacks on advancing equality and other social issues.

"If there's one thing we observe in all countries, it's that women and female directors are more present in independent films than in big-budget commercial films. And so these are often the first films to be affected by economic difficulties."

Lack of diversity


Collectif 50/50 has also expressed concern over the diversity of countries represented in the official selection this year, with voices from the West dominating.

"This also raises questions about inclusion in general and what international narrative we're presenting, given that the Cannes Film Festival was built around a specific political context and also aims to depict a state of the world. So what does it mean to truly represent a state of the world if it's only a handful of countries telling that story?" de Casimacker asks.

People walk past the Palais des Festivals ahead of the Cannes Film Festival on 11 May 2026. © Andreea Alexandru/Invision/AP


To help address this imbalance, Collectif 50/50 has launched a mentorship programme, Mariama Lab, for young African women professionals from five West African countries who want to transition from making short films to feature films. In partnership with Mariama Institut, a film writing residency in Mauritania created by screenwriter Kessen Tall and director Azata Soro, participants are supported for a year by leading figures in the film industry.

"The idea is to combine our strengths internationally on these issues, not simply to stop at our national borders, but to consider cinema and filmmaking as a whole," de Casimacker says, explaining that collaboration is key throughout the audiovisual sector, from financing to production.

Collectif 50/50 is presenting the project on the sidelines of the Cannes festival, where it aims to draw attention to diversity and inclusion through a series of events.

"Cinema conveys images, and today, whether internationally or otherwise, with the absence or underrepresentation of certain regions, there's a tendency to value a predominantly white culture and cinema," de Casimacker says.

She and her colleagues aim to "bring the margins towards the centre for a cinema that is a little more inclusive, and that allows everyone to identify and recognise themselves and to have somewhat plural narratives, reflecting our society".
ONLY SENDING MEN BACK, EH WOT

EU's push to deport Afghan refugees brings the Taliban back to the table

GENDER APARTHEID STATE 

The European Union is moving towards closer cooperation with Afghanistan's Taliban regime over the return of Afghan migrants, despite legal and human rights concerns about sending people back to the country.


Issued on: 15/05/2026 - RFI


An Afghan asylum seeker sits outside a tent in Brussels in September 2023. European governments are pushing for closer cooperation with Taliban authorities over the return of Afghan migrants. 
AFP - SIMON WOHLFAHRT

The European Commission this week confirmed that it had invited Taliban representatives to Brussels for technical talks on deportations, with EU officials saying the meeting could take place before the summer.

The discussions reflect growing pressure from several European governments seeking to send back rejected asylum seekers and Afghans convicted of crimes. Rights groups and migration analysts warn that conditions in Afghanistan remain unsafe.

“The European Commission, together with the Swedish Ministry of Justice, has sent a letter to the de facto authorities in Afghanistan asking them to take part in a technical meeting on the return of Afghan migrants,” European Commission spokesperson Markus Lammert told journalists in Brussels on Tuesday.

He said that EU member states had mandated the European Union to maintain "operational dialogue" with the Taliban, but added this "in no way" amounted to a formal recognition of the regime.

Two technical meetings between European officials and Afghan authorities have already taken place in Kabul. This time, the talks would be held in Brussels, bringing Taliban representatives into the heart of EU institutions.

Planned EU-Taliban talks on return of Afghan nationals spark backlash
Deportation pressure

Several European governments have been pushing Brussels for months to restart deportations to Afghanistan, which were heavily restricted after the Taliban returned to power in August 2021.

Twenty countries, including Germany, Poland, Greece and Italy, sent a joint letter to Brussels in October 2025 calling for negotiations with the authorities in Kabul.

They argue that Europe needs to resume deportations of some rejected Afghan asylum seekers and people convicted of crimes because they pose a security risk.

Germany became the first European country to deport Afghans back to Taliban-run Afghanistan in August 2024. Since then, 121 Afghans living illegally in Germany have been returned to Kabul in three deportation operations.

German authorities said those deported had criminal records involving offences including sexual violence, homicide and assault – but an investigation this month by German broadcaster ZDF found Berlin was also targeting single Afghan men with no criminal convictions.
Afghan nationals arrive at Hanover-Langenhagen airport in Germany in September 2025. AFP - MICHAEL MATTHEY


Taliban representatives travelled to Germany in July last year after demanding that direct talks take place before further deportations could go ahead.

“We want to carry out regular returns, and that does not mean only charter flights, but also commercial flights,” German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt said in early October.

Austria followed 10 days later by deporting an Afghan refugee convicted of sexual offences and aggravated violence.

“These criminals must leave our country and where they come from does not matter,” Austrian Chancellor Christian Stocker said.

EU confirms 'contact' with Taliban in Afghanistan over migrant returns
Rights concerns

Rights groups and migration specialists say deportations to Afghanistan remain dangerous under Taliban rule.

“It is obvious that the conditions are not in place for people to return to Afghanistan,” Laurent Delbos from Forum Réfugiés, a French refugee support organisation, told RFI.

While European law does not completely prohibit deportations to Afghanistan, member states remain bound by the European Convention on Human Rights, which bans torture and inhuman treatment.

“Case law from recent decades prohibits returning people to countries where they would face this kind of treatment,” explained Matthieu Tardis, a migration policy specialist and co-director of the French migration research group Synergies Migrations.


Afghan refugees gather during a protest calling for support from the United Nations refugee agency UNHCR in Islamabad in May 2022. AFP - FAROOQ NAEEM


UN agencies have repeatedly issued warnings over human rights violations in Afghanistan since the Taliban returned to power. Reports have documented arbitrary arrests, forced disappearances, political repression and what UN officials describe as “gender apartheid”.

Afghans were the largest group of asylum seekers in the European Union in 2025, while Eurostat figures showed that 73 percent received protection at the first stage of the asylum process.

The European Court of Human Rights blocked the deportation of an Afghan man from Sweden in March because of a “real risk of ill-treatment” if he returned, partly because of his “westernisation”.

Thousands of Afghan refugees return from Pakistan as border tensions boil over
Diplomatic line crossed

European governments are also trying to overcome practical barriers to deportations.

Without cooperation from the Taliban authorities on travel documents and flights, deportations remain difficult to carry out.

“These discussions must move forward if they want to implement these deportations,” Tardis explained.

Criticism has already emerged inside the European Parliament.

“For years, the European Commission has collaborated with some of the world’s most authoritarian regimes as part of European Union migration policy,” French Green member of the European Parliament Mélissa Camara told RFI.

"A new line has been crossed with the invitation of representatives of the Taliban regime. It marks a profound abandonment of the values and rights that form the foundation of the European Union."

Amnesty International researcher Zaman Sultani condemned what he called a “scandalous” shift that ignored arbitrary Taliban rule.

“Most of the deportees we spoke to are human rights activists who can no longer even return to where they lived or work because they fear being recognised and then tortured or killed,” he said. “But where can they return except home?”

The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights called in July last year for “an immediate halt to forced returns of all Afghan refugees and asylum seekers”.

This article has been adapted from the original verison in French by Caroline Renaux.

Sierra Leone to take in hundreds of West Africans deported by US, minister says


Sierra Leone has agreed to take in hundreds of West African migrants who are being deported by the United States, its foreign minister has said – the latest deal as part of the ​Trump administration's bid to accelerate removals.


Issued on: 16/05/2026 - RFI

Minister of Foreign Affairs Timothy Kabba, pictured at an Ecowas meeting in Abuja in December 2025, has said Sierra Leone will take in hundreds of West African migrants deported from the US. AFP - LIGHT ORIYE TAMUNOTONYE

The first flight of so-called third-country deportees will arrive in ⁠Sierra Leone on 20 May transporting 25 nationals from Senegal, Ghana, Guinea and Nigeria, Foreign Minister Timothy Kabba told Reuters.

Sierra Leone signed a Third Country National Agreement ‌with the US to accept 300 Ecowas citizens from the US per year with a ⁠maximum of 25 a month," Kabba said, referring to the 15-member West African regional bloc.

The US has previously sent third-country deportees to African states including Democratic Republic of Congo, Ghana, Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea ​and Eswatini.

The move has been criticised by legal experts and rights groups over the legal ‌basis for the transfers and the treatment of deportees sent to countries where they are not nationals.

Deportees to Africa forced home


Sierra Leone's arrangement to accept only deportees from Ecowas countries is similar to that of Ghana.

Deportees sent to Ghana, Equatorial Guinea and elsewhere on the continent have then been forced to return to their home countries ​despite receiving court-ordered protection in the US designed to prevent that from happening.

It is unclear whether the deportees sent to Sierra Leone will be allowed to stay there.

Kabba did not say what Sierra Leone would get in ​return for taking in the deportees, but noted it was "part of our bilateral relationship with ​the US to assist with its immigration policy".

In a report published in February entitled "At what cost?", Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said the total ​cost of third-country removals was unknown, but that more than $32 million had been sent directly to five countries – Equatorial Guinea, Rwanda, El Salvador, Eswatini and Palau.

The US and Sierra Leone have been at odds on deportations before. In 2017, during the first Trump administration, Washington said the US Embassy in Freetown would deny tourist and business visas ⁠to Sierra Leonean foreign ministry and immigration officials because the government was refusing to take in Sierra Leonean deportees.

The State Department did ⁠not immediately respond ​to a request for comment on the new agreement with Sierra Leone. The White House and the State Department have previously said the deportations are lawful.

(with newswires)



 ANTI  REFUGEE, ASYLUM MIGRANT LAWS

Council of Europe reinterprets migrant rights, Meloni champions 'Italian model'

Council of Europe meeting in Moldova
Copyright Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
By Fortunato Pinto
Published on 


Council of Europe member states have backed a declaration reinterpreting the European Convention on Human Rights, and Italy claims credit for the returns scheme agreed by Rome and Tirana.

The meeting of the Council of Europe Committee of Ministers concluded on Friday in Chisinau, Moldova. Top of European leaders' agenda were unwavering support for Ukraine, the strengthening of democratic security, the fight against information manipulation and foreign interference, as well as the management of migration flows.

Among the most important decisions, taken on Italy's initiative, the standout measure is the adoption of a new interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights, which could facilitate the expulsion of some migrants, including to "repatriation centres" in third countries.

What the Council of Europe declaration says

In detail, the approved declaration defines the rights set out in Articles 3 and 8 of the Convention, which concern protection from torture and inhuman or degrading treatment and the right to private and family life. The document endorses cooperation with third countries on migration, including the use of "repatriation centres", provided that those countries comply with the Convention on Human Rights.

The text states that the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment remains absolute, but specifies that 'the assessment of the minimum level of severity of ill-treatment that constitutes inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment is relative and depends on all the circumstances of the case'.

On the legal front, as regards Article 8, the declaration states that states may expel foreign nationals despite their right to private and family life, provided that this is balanced against a legitimate aim, such as national security, and that the European Court of Human Rights would require 'valid reasons' to prevail over a state's decision.

'It is essential to be able to respond with new tools to today's challenges,' explains Italy's Undersecretary for Foreign Affairs Massimo Dell'Utri, underlining that the document acknowledges the need to address effectively and promptly the challenges posed by irregular migration, in order to strengthen border protection and ensure national security, also through cooperation instruments with third countries in managing flows and combating migrant smuggling and organised crime, while at the same time reaffirming the central role of the Convention as a pillar of the European legal order.

Meloni: legitimacy of the Italy-Albania model recognised

The outcome of the summit was greeted with great satisfaction in Rome by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. 'The Chisinau Declaration, adopted today by the 46 member states of the Council of Europe, recognises the legitimacy for nations to pursue innovative solutions in managing migration flows, such as repatriation hubs in third countries, following the model launched by Italy in Albania'.

This is what Prime Minister Meloni writes on social media, noting that 'it is an important result, the outcome of a process that Italy helped to open with courage and determination together with Danish Prime Minister Frederiksen'. 'What was prompting debate only a year ago,' Meloni adds, 'has today become a principle shared by the 46 member states of the Council of Europe and shows, once again, that the Italian approach to an orderly management of migration flows, pursued with seriousness and consistency by our government, has now also become Europe's approach'.

Beyond the migration dossier, the member states of the Council of Europe renewed their firm support for Ukraine, with particular emphasis on international instruments aimed at determining Russia's responsibility for the aggression. Thirty-six states, including Italy, and the European Union adopted the founding decision establishing the Special Tribunal for the crime of aggression against Ukraine.















Monoskop.org

https://monoskop.org/images/9/95/Hardt_Michael_Negri_Antonio_Empire.pdf

4.3 The Multitude against Empire. 393. Notes. 415. Index. 473. Page 11. PREFACE. Empire is materializing before our very eyes. Over the past several decades, as ...

Rebels-library.org

http://rebels-library.org/files/multitude.pdf

Page 1. MULTITUDE. WAR AND DEMOCRACY. IN THE AGE OF EMPIRE. MICHAEL HARDT ... Empire calls on war for its legitimation, the multitude calls on democracy as its ...


Newleftreview.org

https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii120/articles/empire-twenty-years-on.pdf

Just as today's. Empire was formed in response to the insurgencies of the multitudes from below, so too, potentially, it could fall to them, as long as those.


Tropical forests still under pressure despite slowdown in losses

Millions of hectares of tropical forest were destroyed in 2025, despite a slowdown in deforestation led by Brazil. Environmental experts say the drop shows governments can curb forest loss, but warn rainforests remain under pressure from agriculture, mining and fires.


Issued on: 15/05/2026 - RFI

BOYCOTT PALM OIL
Smoke rises during the deforestation of a new planting area for palm oil plantations in Lamno, Indonesia's Aceh province on 18 January 2026. 
AFP - CHAIDEER MAHYUDDIN

Tropical regions lost 4.3 million hectares of primary forest during the year, an area roughly the size of Switzerland, figures from Global Forest Watch – run by the World Resources Institute and the University of Maryland – showed.

The total was down 36 percent from 2024, when extreme wildfires drove tropical forest destruction to record levels. But forest loss still remained 46 percent higher than it was 10 years ago.

The equivalent of 11 football fields of primary forest continued disappearing every minute, affecting biodiversity, water supplies and carbon storage.

Global Forest Watch said current losses remain far above the level needed to meet the UN goal of ending deforestation by 2030.

Brazil launches global fund to reward protection of rainforests


Brazil effect


Much of the decline was driven by Brazil, home to the world’s largest rainforest.

Since returning to office in 2023, President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has made tackling deforestation a political priority.

Brazil also hosted the UN Cop30 climate summit in Belém in November, where rainforest protection was a major focus.

The country reduced primary forest destruction unrelated to fires by 41 percent compared with 2024, reaching its lowest level since records began, after introducing anti-deforestation measures and increasing penalties for environmental crimes.

“The working group established by Brazil with the government, civil society, academia, local communities and the private sector forms a powerful formula for combating deforestation,” Mirela Sandrini, a Brazil specialist at the World Resources Institute, told RFI.

But Sandrini warned that Brazil’s forests remain under threat from agricultural expansion linked to commodity production and livelihoods.

Other countries also reduced tropical forest destruction, including Colombia, while Malaysia and Indonesia kept losses well below previous levels.

Fragile progress


Environmental pressures continue across many forest regions.

Soy farming and cattle ranching in Brazil, nickel mining in Indonesia and cobalt mining in the Congo Basin are all contributing to forest destruction.

Primary forest loss also remained high in Bolivia, Cameroon and Madagascar.

While agriculture remains the main driver of forest destruction worldwide, wildfires also played a major role in 2025, accounting for 42 percent of global forest losses.

“Over the past three years, fires have destroyed more than twice as much forest cover as 20 years ago,” said Elizabeth Goldman, co-director of Global Forest Watch.

While some fires occur naturally, most are caused by humans.



Fire threat

Wildfires were especially severe in Canada, where 5.3 million hectares were destroyed, making 2025 the country’s second-worst year on record.

In France, forest destruction caused by fires was seven times higher than in 2024.

In Spain and Portugal, fires caused 60 percent of tree losses as hotter and drier conditions increased the risk of wildfire.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has warned that in a world warmed by 4C, fires could become around 30 percent more frequent, with burned areas expanding by 50 to 70 percent.

Global Forest Watch warned 2026 could become “a pivotal year” if the El Nino weather pattern returns and pushes temperatures even higher.

(with newswires)
'Conversion therapy' is banned in eight EU countries – so why not the rest?

A decision by the European Union not to pursue a bloc-wide ban on so-called "conversion therapy" targeting LGBTQI+ people has divided campaigners and lawmakers. Brussels argues that a binding law could have taken up to 18 years to negotiate.


Issued on: 14/05/2026 - RFI

Demonstrators protest against conversion therapy outside parliament in Nicosia, Cyprus, on 25 May 2023. The European Union has ruled out pursuing a bloc-wide ban on the practice. © AP - Petros Karadjias


Instead of proposing legislation across all 27 member states, the European Commission on Wednesday said it would recommend that governments introduce their own bans – a strategy Equality Commissioner Hadja Lahbib told RFI was the fastest and most realistic path to action.

“To adopt binding legislation, unanimity would have been needed anyway,” Lahbib said.

“Rather than plunging into discussions that could have taken 10, 15 or even 18 years, we preferred this recommendation because we are convinced it will be much more effective.”


'Shameful' practice

Conversion practices seek to change a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity through sometimes violent methods.

United Nations experts have called for a worldwide ban, describing the practices as discriminatory, humiliating and a violation of bodily integrity.

More than one million people signed a petition last year calling on the EU to outlaw the procedures – which reportedly include physical aggression, exorcism, hormone therapy, electric shocks and spiritual retreats – across the bloc.

The campaign was backed by public figures including pop stars Angèle and Pierre de Maere, as well as former French prime minister Gabriel Attal.

“It is a shameful practice, an unacceptable practice. This is not healthcare – it’s violence in disguise. Nobody should have to go through this,” Lahbib said.


The European Commission argued that trying to introduce a binding EU law could have led to years of political deadlock.

A pride flag flew outside the commission headquarters in Brussels as the announcement was made on Wednesday.

“Conversion practices have no place in our union,” said European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

Eight EU countries have already outlawed conversion practices – Belgium, Cyprus, France, Germany, Greece, Malta, Portugal and Spain.

Possible future bans are also being discussed in Ireland, the Netherlands and Denmark, while other countries, including Slovakia, continue to resist.

Divided response

Reactions from gay rights groups and lawmakers were mixed.

Supporters of the commission’s approach argued that a recommendation could deliver quicker results than years of negotiations over an EU law.

Cianan Russel from LGBTQI+ rights network ILGA-Europe said the EU had taken the strongest action open to it.

“We are engaged in a long-term struggle and we want a viable and effective solution over the long term. The commission has taken the most effective measure possible,” Russel said.

Critics argued that Brussels had failed to act strongly enough at a time when homophobic rhetoric is growing internationally.


The campaign group Against Conversion Therapy, which launched the petition, called the decision “a missed opportunity”.

“In an international political climate where reactionary ideas are on the rise around the world, there is an urgent need for the European Union to act,” the group said.

At the European Parliament, lawmakers adopted a resolution in April supporting a ban.

Manon Aubry, a left-wing French MEP, described the commission’s decision as “shameful”.

Meanwhile Melissa Camara, a member of the parliament’s LGBTIQ+ rights group, told the French news agency AFP the commission’s move was “a step in the right direction” but “far too timid” given “the damage and trauma caused by these practices”.

(with newswires and reporting from RFI in French)