Thursday, November 30, 2006

The First Computer- Second Century B.C.


The New York Times is reporting this amazing discovery, which pre-dates the first modern computers of the Ninteenth Century by thousands of years.

A century ago, pieces of a strange mechanism with bronze gears and dials were recovered from an ancient shipwreck off the coast of Greece. Historians of science concluded that this was an instrument that calculated and illustrated astronomical information, particularly phases of the Moon and planetary motions, in the second century B.C.

The Antikythera Mechanism, sometimes called the world’s first computer, has now been examined with the latest in high-resolution imaging systems and three-dimensional X-ray tomography. A team of British, Greek and American researchers was able to decipher many inscriptions and reconstruct the gear functions, revealing, they said, “an unexpected degree of technical sophistication for the period.”

Historians of technology think the instrument is technically more complex than any known device for at least a millennium afterward.

The mechanism, presumably used in preparing calendars for seasons of planting and harvesting and fixing religious festivals, had at least 30, possibly 37, hand-cut bronze gear-wheels, the researchers reported. An ingenious pin-and-slot device connecting two gear-wheels induced variations in the representation of lunar motions according to the Hipparchos model of the Moon’s elliptical orbit around Earth.

The Ancient Greeks also had steam power that they used to make toys with and other technological advancements so here is the question historians ponder;
Why No Industrial Revolution in Ancient Greece?

Ancient civilizations were quiet advanced as antiquarians have known for hundred of years, hence the Atlantis Myth as a meme of this. And no we did not need aliens to help us with out technological development.

Rather ancient civilizations may have had a religious reason for not advancing technology. Being pagan civilizations they would have a different world view , that of magick ,than the the later Christian civilizations that would bring forth modern capitalism, science and the industrial revolution.

Despite their hierarchical social structures, ancient civilizations were based on use value rather than exchange value. The latter came into existence with the transition from the middle ages to the Rennisance.Modern capitalism and the industrial revolution in technology is the result of the change from use to exchange value.

It is also a change in world view, from one that sees science as a way to know god, gnosis, to one that has 'faith'. Thus by the end of the Rennisance a materialist science devoid of religious morality was begining to come into existence as the Rennisance humanitarians rediscovered gnosis and Hellenistic philosophy that truimphed in the Enlightenment.The decline of the Catholic church gave rise to civil society and a greater openess to ideas including science and technology.

The development of Protestantism
allowed for a more flexible Christianity able to adapt to the technology of the industrial revolution and the advent of captialism. A Christianity of towns folk and merchants rather than of priests and peasants which had been the power of the Holy Roman Empire and its Church State. The creation of a non-Catholic Church in England, gave rise to protestantism and puritanism which embraced technology as it transformed its agriculutral economy into a capitalist one.

The conflict between science and Christianity that is still with us today is an ancient conflict between Hellenistic paganism, gnosis, and catholic faith.

Even relatively more recent civilizations have been amazing scientists with their technology such as the recent discovery of nano-tech used in the creation of the Damascus steel.

See:

Science

Technology

Ancient civilizations

Computers

Astronomy

Pagan





Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Finally A BT Speaks About Chong

Joanne's Journey comments on the Chong resignation. But as I predicted she repeats Tory slanders now circulating about Michael Chong. "According to some insiders, ex-Minister Michael Chong was not completely above-board with the PM, and kept his cards close to his chest until the last minute. This contradicts Chong's story that he kept Harper well apprised of his concerns. There is also a dispute about how much the PM kept Chong in the loop ahead of time."

Jacks Newswatch also covered the Chong affair for all of one day, with comments. But his site was not showing up on the BT problems with their aggregator, and with stupid Pingomatic, (problems I am having too so I recommend Jack use Blog Flux).

The rest of the BT, well as I said before Silence is Golden or was it Silence is Death. Nope thats AIDS and we know where these dweebs stand on that.

See

Whipping Boy

Quebec

Blogging Tories



Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Class Biased Justice


Why do I find it outrageous that an Afro American mother who obviously is not a scion of some wealthy family is being held on $1 million dollars bail accused of killing her one month old daughter.
A year after the fact. So why the overkill. Could it be the headline nature of the case.
Ohio mom held in microwave murder of baby

She is a classic case of teenage motherhood, she had her first child at 15, the next at 17. She lives in a housing complex and obviously is not wealthy, she is one of Americas underclass. She obviously poses no threat to her other children.
Accused mom showed baby love, friend says But the court apparently did not take that into account. She is being judged guilty not innocent, with such an onorous bail she cannot possibly raise.

Could it be because of this...
Mom in microwave baby case has record for crimes of poverty.

Heck even wealthy scions of the Kennedy family have faced less onorous bail commitments on murder charges.

And could this be a case of post partum depression in a State that has some of the most restrictive abortion laws in the United States? Inquiring minds want to know.

Seee

Crime


Murder


abortion


Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Stoned In Iran

I often see the right wing proclaiming their indignation over events like this, demanding feminists respond, as if feminists ignored the plight of their sisters oppressed by Islam. Well they don't as Maryam Namazie proves. She posted this on her website, which opposes Islamism. I expect all those Blogging Tories tosign this petition. Put up or shut up.


7 women are at risk of imminent execution by stoning in Iran. Sign the petition against it by
clicking here.

This outrage has to be stopped now!


A tip o' the blog to Renegade Eye

Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Another MSM Live Blogger MIA

Edmonton Journal political affairs reporter Larry Johnsrude claims to have been live blogging from the Calgary Roundup Centre on Saturday during the PC Leadership vote. Really. Must have been doing it at the same time his pals at the Calgary Herald were.

And like them he wasn't showing up on Google in real time. I guess you have to be either a subscriber to one of these two Canwest papers to know they are "live blogging" or check them out online at the time. Their prescence was not noted by other bloggers checking out for results of the vote.

And if you check out Johnsrudes Journal blog you will find it less than awe inspiring as to the events of last Saturday. Pretty mundane reporting. And despite his biography extolling his web savvy he and his Calgary Herald pals seem to have been off in cyberspace by themselves.
Larry Johnsrude
After 30 years in newspapers, Larry has found the Internet to be a new and better way of keeping in touch with our community and telling our stories. As website reporter-editor, he brings his experience as a political, features, post-secondary education and editorial writer. His blog looks at how the Internet is changing traditional journalism, and offers insight into a range of topics both serious and whimsical.
Compare the blogging in the MSM and blogosphere that is covering the Liberal Convention and you can't miss it. Maybe Johnsonrude should join the Canadian Blog Exchange like Paul Wells has then the blogosphere would know he was live blogging.

With the Alberta PC convention unless you are a regular Journal or Herald reader you missed it. And there was no indication on Saturdays Journal web page that they were live blogging. And Johnsrude is the Journals website editor. Go figure.

Obviously he is not using the internet effectively or we would not have missed his live blogging on the weekend. Well there is always this coming Saturday, so I will check him out then.


So are they really bloggers? Let alone effective ones? I would say NOT. And unlike the rest of us, they get paid to do this. Which also disqualifies them as bloggers I would suggest.


See:

Conservative Leadership Race



Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
, , , , , , , , , ,,
, , , , , , ,, , , , , , , , , , , ,,, , ,

Edmonton Journal PC Leadership Poll

This is a non scientific poll on the Edmonton Journal Website.
The second ballot in the race to become Alberta Conservative leader and the next premier is Saturday. Who would you vote for?
Jim Dinning
45.32 %
Ted Morton
14.27 %
Ed Stelmach
40.41 %


See:

Conservative Leadership Race


Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
, , , , , , ,

Is It Jim Or Ed, Ted?

Another Morton flip flop.

SUNDAY
Reporters: Is Ed Stelmach in this race?
Morton: “He has a long way to come.”
Reporters : What does that mean? Is it a two-way or a three-way race?
Morton “I think it’s basically Jim or me.”

NOW
Morton: “The real race is between Ed and myself.”

So which is it Ted?

A tip o' the blog to Renewing the One Party State


See:

Ted Morton


Conservative Leadership Race


Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
, , , , , , ,

Smoke And Mirrors

The way the Canadian media is playing up the NATO story one would think that Harper, O'Connor and MacKay had actually gotten some kind of commitment from the organization to help out in Kandahar. The truth is of course they didn't get anything of the kind. As the Financial Times reports;Nato officials said that five to eight of the 50 specific restrictions on national troops had been eliminated, making it easier to move soldiers and equipment across different sectors in Afghanistan.

Five to eight of fifty, that still leaves 45 to 42 conditions that can be applied by NATO members NOT to help out. Not much of a commitment. And just to make that point....José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, Spain’s prime minister, and Romano Prodi, his Italian counterpart, insisted that their countries retained the right to decide when troops should be deployed. Mr Prodi said the position of Italy, France, Germany and Spain, none of which station or intend to deploy troops in the turbulent south of Afghanistan, was the same. At a separate press conference, President Jac­ques Chirac said France could consider sending its troops outside Kabul case by case.

And all those extra troops that NATO committed,making Harper happy, well like the Polish troops, its old news, they were already committed to Afghanistan before this meeting.A UK official also emphasised that Bulgaria, Spain and Macedonia were sending reinforcements to the Afgh­an­istan mission. But Nato diplomats acknowledged that the contributions were relatively small and had been decided beforehand.

And don't count on Germany as Der Spiegel reports;

This account of the meeting is surprising, at least at first sight. For weeks, a number of NATO partners -- led by the US, Great Britain, Canada and Denmark -- have conducted a genuine anti-German campaign. Germany has been repeatedly criticized for stationing its troops in the country's north, where they are accused of enjoying a kind of extended vacation, while others are risking their lives in the military skirmishes of the south. But Angela Merkel stood firm in the face of calls for sending German troops to the south. She refered again and again to the good work Germans are doing in the north.

Merkel's position didn't change fundamentally during the NATO summit in Riga. She was the third speaker at the dinner, after British Prime Minister Tony Blair and his Canadian counterpart Stephen Harper. Merkel made it more than clear "that we are well positioned with our mandate and that there is no reason to change that mandate," according to government sources. Merkel had already told NATO's Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer that Germany will not send additional troops to Afghanistan.



So Canadian troops are stuck on the frontlines again, taking the most casualities,not because NATO asked them but because Macho Harper and Macho Hillier wanted to play soldier.

See

Afghanistan



The image “http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4319/673/320/2006-08-31-Troops.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.


Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
, , ,
, , , , , , , , ,

Pakistan Speaks For the Taliban


On Wednesday night, however, a senior Pakistani official insisted that Nato needed to reach an accommodation with the insurgency. “Instead of fighting Taliban militants, foreign troops should reconcile themselves to this reality,” he said. “If the western world makes the mistake of prolonging this war, we would only see a never-ending conflict”. Nato discord mars Afghan headway

Pakistan is once again defending its allies the Taliban. In order to maintain power in oil rich Balochistan (sometimes called Baluchistan) the province which has been fighting for autonomy, the Musharraf regime assassinated the leading spokesman for Baluchistan Autonomy this summer. Along with Pakistani regular army troops occupying the region Pakistan also has used its Secret Service, the notorious pro-Islamist ISI to negotiate a deal with the Taliban in the region to act as shock troops against the Balochistan peoples. It is this province that borders Afghanistan and the Pashtun region of Kandahar.

President Pervez Musharraf and the military are responsible for the worsening of the conflict in Balochistan. Tensions between the government and its Baloch opposition have grown because of Islamabad’s heavy-handed armed response to Baloch militancy and its refusal to negotiate demands for political and economic autonomy. The killing of Baloch leader Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti in August 2006 sparked riots and will likely lead to more confrontation. The conflict could escalate if the government insists on seeking a military solution to what is a political problem and the international community, especially the U.S., fails to recognise the price that is involved for security in neighbouring Afghanistan.International Crisis Group - Pakistan: the Worsening Conflict in Balochistan


While the Canadian government attempts to negotiate with Pakistan and share joint operations information to protect our troops from Taliban attacks from Pakistan, a better approach would be to support the Balochistan autonomy movement, demanding that the region be recognized for what it is a Nation. After all they did it for Quebec.

See:

Musharraf

Pakistan

Afghanistan



The image “http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4319/673/320/2006-08-31-Troops.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.


Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
, , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Alberta Business Back PC Candidates

Two interesting Edmonton Journal articles on which Alberta companies back PC leadership candidates. Dinning of course has the backing of the majority of big corporations in the province. But Mark Norris, had the backing of his bosses and their corporation, The Edmoton Oilers.

One of the articles is by the Journals Business reporter the other by the Journals Sports reporter. Not the usual political reporting. But then again in Alberta politics is both, big business and a professional sport.


No secret who backs Dinning business

As detailed in a 2005 Journal profile, Dinning's corporate ties are far broader than those of any other candidate.

Besides a lengthy stint as a senior exec at TransAlta, the widely perceived front-runner served on the boards of Shaw Communications, Finning International, Parkland Income Fund and Western Financial, among many others.

What's more, as chairman of the Canadian Clean Power Coalition, Dinning rubbed elbows with the brass at Atco, Epcor, Luscar and TransAlta.

His backers include such powerful execs as Finning CEO Doug Whitehead, Shaw founder J.R. Shaw, TransAlta boss Steve Snyder, PCL boss Ross Grieve, Stantec CEO Tony Franceschini, and Parkland founder Jack Donald.

Not only did The Globe and Mail -- the preferred daily read of the nation's corporate elite -- endorse Dinning in a recent editorial, its Calgary-based business columnist, Deborah Yedlin, also gave the ex-Alberta treasurer two thumbs up.

While Edmonton's Mark Norris, Alberta's former economic development minister, also boasts some key corporate backers -- including Calgary tycoon Murray Edwards -- the buzz on the street indicates that most of the big-money crowd backs Dinning.

In fact, only one company -- Agrium -- offered any specifics, noting that its chairman, longtime Dinning acquaintance Frank Proto, has contributed $250 to the candidate's campaign.

Two firms -- Telus and EnCana -- said they coughed up $5,000 apiece for each of the eight candidates. Meanwhile, 14 other firms, including Imperial Oil, Agrium, Epcor, Syncrude and ATB Financial, said their own in-house policies forbid any financial contributions to individual politicians.

Only three firms -- WestJet, Agrium and PCL -- specifically confirmed who their CEOs are personally supporting (Dinning, in each case). But it's well-known that other senior execs whose firms were polled are also in the Dinning camp.


Mark Norris and the Edmonton Oilers

The chair of the Oilers ownership group, Cal Nichols, was also the driving force behind GLG Consulting Ltd. Formed in Dec., 2004, it was a unique corporate mechanism that essentially morphed into the financial backing and campaign team for Mark Norris, who went down in flames as a first ballot also-ran Saturday. GLG employed Norris, a former MLA who lost his seat in the 2004 election, as its president at $10,000 per month until last May when he resigned. GLG's 130-odd shareholders included Nichols and at least nine other members of the Oilers ownership group, as well as Edmonton Rush lacrosse team owners Craig Anstead and Bruce Urban.

On Saturday, Nichols had a team of about 20 people manning the phones at his west-end Gasland offices, urging people to brave the chill and vote for Norris. But he was a distant sixth, well behind Calgarians Jim Dinning and Ted Morton and Edmonton-area MLA Ed Stelmach, who will duke it out on a second ballot next weekend.

So the line between Norris and Oilers owners like Nichols, Ron Hodgson, Gary Gregg and Ed Bean is indeed a straight one.

And if a sports fan wants to discern the value of friends in high places, he need only ask the Eskimos, who have always enjoyed a cozy relationship with the Conservative party, owing to the fact former premiers Peter Lougheed and Don Getty are Eskimo alumni. So too is current lieutenant-governor Norman Kwong.

Do you think it's a coincidence that Eskimos CEO Rick LeLacheur mused aloud about new seats for Commonwealth Stadium mere weeks before the provincial government announced a commitment of $9.5 million to do the job? Me neither. The Eskimos are connected the way the Oilers can only dream about.

But in their quest to increase Edmonton's political voice in the provincial arena, Nichols and the rest of GLG's shareholders simply backed the wrong horse.


Yep I said that too.

See:

Conservative Leadership Race



Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
, , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,