The Political Process In Morocco: Monarchy, Reform, And Incremental Democracy – Analysis
May 27, 2026
By Dr. Mohamed Chtatou
This essay provides a comprehensive analysis of the political process in Morocco, examining the structural role of the monarchy, the development of constitutional governance, party politics, civil society, and the contested trajectory of democratisation. Drawing on comparative political theory, historical institutionalism, and empirical scholarship, it argues that Moroccan politics is best understood not as a failed or stalled democracy, but as a distinctive hybrid regime in which the Makhzen — the royal palace and its networks — continuously recalibrates relations with elected institutions, political parties, and social movements to preserve monarchical centrality while accommodating pressures for reform. The 2011 constitutional reforms, the rise and fall of Islamist party government, sub-national governance, gender politics, and the structural constraints imposed by rentier dynamics and regional geopolitics are examined in detail. The essay concludes that Morocco’s political trajectory reflects a calculated strategy of adaptive governance that, while preserving significant space for pluralism, stops well short of genuine power-sharing.
1. Introduction
Morocco occupies a singular position in the comparative politics of the Arab world. It is simultaneously one of the most politically liberalised states in the MENA region and a country in which real executive authority remains firmly concentrated in the hands of a monarch whose legitimacy is simultaneously constitutional, religious, and dynastic. This combination of formal pluralism and substantive monarchical dominance has attracted extensive scholarly attention, generating debates about whether Morocco represents a genuine experiment in gradual democratisation, a durable monarchy employing liberalisation as a regime-maintenance strategy, or something genuinely novel that resists familiar analytical categories (Brumberg, 2002; Maghraoui, 2002; Catusse, 2008).
The question is not merely academic. Morocco is a strategic partner of the European Union and the United States, a recipient of significant development assistance, a country that has managed thus far to avoid the violent ruptures experienced by its neighbours, and a society undergoing rapid socioeconomic transformation driven by urbanisation, demographic change, and integration into global markets. Understanding how its political system actually works — how power is organised, how demands are processed, and how change does or does not occur — is therefore a matter of both scholarly and policy importance (Denoeux & Gateau, 1995; Storm, 2007).
This essay proceeds as follows. Section 2 establishes the historical foundations of the modern Moroccan state, tracing the consolidation of the post-independence political order. Section 3 analyses the constitutional architecture and the structural role of the monarchy. Section 4 examines party politics and electoral institutions. Section 5 considers the dynamics of civil society and social movements, with particular attention to the 2011 protests. Section 6 addresses sub-national governance and decentralisation. Section 7 analyses gender and representation. Section 8 reflects on external dimensions of Moroccan politics, including the Western Sahara conflict. Section 9 offers concluding reflections on the prospects for political change.
2. Historical Foundations of the Modern Moroccan State
Modern Moroccan politics cannot be understood without reference to its pre-colonial, colonial, and immediately post-independence history. The Sharifian state — legitimised by the Sultan’s descent from the Prophet Muhammad — possessed a distinctive character that distinguished Morocco from the Ottoman provinces of the Mashriq. The Sultan’s dual role as political sovereign and Commander of the Faithful (Amîr al-Mu’minîn) fused temporal and religious authority in ways that proved extraordinarily resilient across the upheavals of colonialism and independence (Hammoudi, 1997; Pennell, 2000).
French and Spanish colonialism (1912–1956) paradoxically reinforced certain dimensions of this authority. The French protectorate, operating through the fiction of indirect rule, preserved the formal institution of the sultanate even as it hollowed out its effective power. This created a complex dynamic: the Sultan retained symbolic authority and became a focus of nationalist sentiment, while real administrative and economic power was exercised by the French Résidence. Sultan Mohammed V’s exile by the French in 1953 and his triumphant return in 1955 transformed him from a religious figurehead into a nationalist hero, dramatically amplifying the legitimacy of the monarchy in the post-independence period (Leveau, 1985; Pennell, 2000).
Morocco’s Mohammed V. Photo Credit: Fotograaf Onbekend / Anefo, Wikipedia Commons
Independence in 1956 inaugurated a struggle over the organisation of political authority. The Istiqlal Party, which had led the nationalist movement, anticipated a leading role in the post-independence order. Mohammed V, however, moved quickly to assert monarchical prerogatives, appointing governments, managing relations with political parties, and using the armed forces and security services as direct instruments of royal power. His son and successor Hassan II, who reigned from 1961 to 1999, institutionalised a form of royal autocracy that relied on divide-and-rule tactics among political parties, a sprawling patronage network known as the Makhzen, periodic but severe repression — particularly during the Years of Lead (les années de plomb) of the 1970s and 1980s — and the mobilising force of the Western Sahara issue, which became central to Moroccan national identity (Entelis, 1989; Slyomovics, 2005).
The transition from Hassan II to Mohammed VI in 1999 was widely anticipated as an opportunity for political opening. The new king initially signalled reformist intent, dismissing the powerful Interior Minister Driss Basri, establishing the Equity and Reconciliation Commission (IER) to address past human rights abuses, and promising a new concept of authority (nouveau concept de l’autorité). These early gestures generated considerable optimism domestically and internationally, though scholars rapidly noted that structural reform of monarchical power remained off the table (Monjib, 2011; Vermeren, 2009).
3. Constitutional Architecture and the Role of the Monarchy
Morocco has had a succession of constitutions — in 1962, 1970, 1972, 1992, 1996, and most recently 2011 — each reflecting the political conditions of its moment and each preserving the structural centrality of the monarchy. The 2011 constitution, adopted by referendum in July of that year, represents the most significant formal expansion of parliamentary and governmental powers in Moroccan constitutional history, though its practical implementation has been characterised by what Fernández-Molina (2011) terms selective constitutionalisation — the selective uptake of constitutional provisions in ways that do not fundamentally alter the distribution of real political power (Chtatou, 2023, May 27 ; Chtatou, 2025, October 7).
The 2011 constitution formally establishes Morocco as a constitutional, democratic, parliamentary and social monarchy (Article 1). It recognises Amazigh as an official language alongside Arabic (Article 5), incorporates a significantly expanded bill of rights including gender equality and protection from torture, and strengthens the independence of the judiciary (Articles 107–128). Crucially, it requires the king to appoint the prime minister — renamed Head of Government — from the party that wins the most seats in parliamentary elections (Article 47), a provision applied for the first time after the November 2011 elections (Madani, Maghraoui, & Zerhouni, 2012).
Nevertheless, the constitution preserves and in some respects reinforces extensive monarchical prerogatives. The king remains Commander of the Faithful (Article 41), chairs the Council of Ministers (Article 48), presides over the Supreme Security Council (Article 54), appoints ambassadors, senior military officers, and governors (Article 49), and retains the power to dissolve parliament (Article 51). The concept of royal arbitration (Article 42) gives the king an ill-defined but potentially expansive role as guardian of the constitutional order. Vairel (2014) argues that the 2011 reforms represented a defensive constitutionalisation designed to absorb protest energy without transferring genuine decision-making authority.
Scholars working within a comparative politics framework have debated how to classify the Moroccan regime. For Brumberg (2002), Morocco exemplifies liberalised autocracy — a regime that institutionalises enough pluralism to generate legitimacy and foreign support while preventing genuine contestation over fundamental power arrangements. Maghraoui (2002) speaks of political authority in crisis, pointing to the growing gap between formal institutional design and the personalised, patrimonial reality of how decisions are actually made. More recently, Dalmasso (2012) has applied the concept of authoritarian upgrading (Heydemann, 2007) to the Moroccan case, arguing that the 2011 reforms represent not liberalisation but adaptation — the reequilibration of the regime in response to changed constraints.
4. Party Politics and Electoral Institutions
Morocco has a large, fractured, and historically unstable multi-party system that reflects both the structural incentives created by royal divide-and-rule strategies and genuine ideological and social cleavages within Moroccan society. As of the mid-2020s, the party system includes parties rooted in nationalism (Istiqlal), the left (the Socialist Union of Popular Forces, USFP; the Party of Progress and Socialism, PPS), liberal conservatism (the National Rally of Independents, RNI; the Popular Movement, MP), Islamism (the Justice and Development Party, PJD), and royal-aligned technocratic formations (the Authenticity and Modernity Party, PAM) (Willis, 2012; Zerhouni, 2004).
The PJD’s trajectory over the decade following 2011 represents perhaps the most significant and instructive episode in recent Moroccan party politics. Having won the most seats in the 2011 parliamentary elections in the wake of the Arab Spring protests, the PJD formed a governing coalition under Prime Minister Abdelilah Benkirane, who became widely popular for his combative, populist communication style. Benkirane’s government pursued a cautious reform agenda — fiscal consolidation, subsidy reform, and modest anti-corruption measures — while maintaining a broadly cooperative relationship with the palace (Daadaoui, 2013).
The limits of this cohabitation were made apparent in 2016–2017, when, following elections in which the PJD again performed strongly, King Mohammed VI declined to ratify Benkirane’s proposed coalition and eventually asked his less confrontational colleague Saad Eddine El Othmani to form a government instead. This episode — labelled the blocage (blockage) — crystallised for many observers the structural constraints on genuine parliamentary government in Morocco: even a party with a strong popular mandate governed within a framework set by the palace, and could be removed from that framework at royal discretion (Wegner, 2011; Catusse & Dazi-Héni, 2017).
The 2021 elections produced a further and more decisive reconfiguration of the party landscape. The PJD suffered a historic collapse, losing over ninety percent of its seats in a result many analysts attributed to a combination of policy failures — particularly in the management of COVID-19 and the normalisation of relations with Israel under the Abraham Accords, both conducted without meaningful parliamentary consultation — internal divisions, and a campaign context in which PAM and RNI, both regarded as close to the palace, were electorally dominant. RNI leader Aziz Akhannouch was appointed Head of Government. The election underscored that while competitive elections impose real costs on parties that fail, the structural parameters of competition are set by the monarchy (Boussaid, 2022).
Electoral institutions in Morocco have been repeatedly modified in ways that fragment party representation and prevent any single party from accumulating a commanding parliamentary majority. Proportional representation with regional lists and low electoral thresholds encourages the multiplication of parties and coalition government, which in turn increases the palace’s role as coalition broker and reduces the leverage of any individual party or prime minister. Sater (2007) argues that this institutional design reflects a deliberate monarchical strategy of institutional proliferation — the creation of multiple, overlapping, competing political actors whose rivalry structures and stabilises monarchical governance (Chtatou, 2025, October 7).
5. Civil Society, Social Movements, and the 2011 Protests
Civil society in Morocco is extensive, heterogeneous, and politically consequential, though its relationship to formal political institutions remains complex and in many respects constrained. The associational landscape includes human rights organisations (notably the Moroccan Association for Human Rights, AMDH, and the Official Advisory Council on Human Rights, CNDH), women’s rights organisations, Amazigh cultural associations, development NGOs, trade unions, professional associations, and youth movements. This dense associational life reflects both genuine civic energy and, in part, the strategic cultivation of civil society by the state as an alternative arena for managing social demands that might otherwise take more disruptive forms (Cavatorta & Dalmasso, 2009).
The February 20 Movement (Mouvement du 20 Février, M20F) that emerged in the context of the 2011 Arab Spring represented the most significant mobilisation of popular political energy in contemporary Moroccan history. Beginning with a demonstration on 20 February 2011 that drew tens of thousands of participants in cities across Morocco, the movement called for a new constitution, an end to corruption, genuine parliamentary government, and the release of political prisoners. It drew together a heterogeneous coalition including secular leftists, Islamists from the banned Al Adl wal Ihsane (Justice and Benevolence), youth activists, Amazigh organisations, and human rights defenders (Vairel, 2014; Zaki, 2011).
The monarchy’s response was rapid, strategic, and ultimately effective in demobilising the movement. In a landmark speech on 9 March 2011, King Mohammed VI announced a process of constitutional reform, ultimately producing the July 2011 constitution described above. By accepting the form of the movement’s constitutional demands while retaining control of the drafting process through a royal commission rather than an elected constituent assembly, the palace channelled protest energy into a controlled institutional channel. The M20F’s demand for a real constitution articulated by the people was deflected into a royal constitution endorsed in a referendum marked by high official turnout figures that many civil society organisations disputed (Sater, 2016; Maghraoui, 2011).
Since 2011, social mobilisation has continued in various forms. The Hirak Rif movement emerged in the northern Rif region in 2016 following the death of fishmonger Mouhcine Fikri, initially focusing on socioeconomic grievances — unemployment, lack of development, and historical marginalisation of the Rif — before escalating into broader demands for political accountability. The movement’s leaders, including Nasser Zefzafi, were arrested in 2017, tried for threatening state security, and sentenced to lengthy prison terms in proceedings that attracted significant criticism from international human rights organisations (Amnesty International, 2018; Human Rights Watch, 2017). The Hirak episode illustrated both the vitality of grassroots mobilisation in Morocco and the firm limits the state places on movements it judges to constitute a structural challenge to the existing order (Chtatou, 2023, May 27).
6. Sub-National Governance and Decentralisation
Morocco’s 2011 constitution and subsequent organic laws introduced a significant reform of sub-national governance, formally establishing the principle of advanced regionalisation (régionalisation avancée) and creating twelve new regions with elected regional councils and presidents. This reform was framed by the royal discourse as a means of devolving power, enhancing local democracy, and accelerating development, particularly in peripheral regions — the Oriental, the south, and the Rif — characterised by high rates of poverty and emigration (Bergh, 2012).
In practice, decentralisation in Morocco reflects the general pattern of Moroccan political reform: a genuine extension of formal institutional capacity at the sub-national level combined with the continuation of significant central oversight through appointed Walis and governors who represent the Ministry of the Interior and retain substantial de facto authority. Regional councils have real budgetary resources and administrative competencies, but major development projects continue to be driven by royal initiatives through specialised agencies — such as the Agence du Sud, which coordinates development in the southern provinces — that operate outside the regular democratic framework (Catusse, Destremau, & Verdier, 2010).
The relationship between decentralisation and democracy in Morocco thus exhibits what Bergh (2012) calls a dual track: a formal track of elected regional governance with increasing technical capacity, and an informal track of royal-appointed technocratic management that handles the most strategically significant investment and development decisions. Whether this duality will evolve towards a more integrated and genuinely participatory model of sub-national governance remains an open and contested question in both scholarship and political debate (Chtatou, 2025, October 7).
7. Gender, Representation, and the Politics of Women’s Rights
The politics of gender in Morocco illustrates, with particular clarity, the complex interplay between top-down royal reform, bottom-up civil society pressure, Islamist political mobilisation, and patriarchal social structures that characterises Moroccan political life more broadly. The 2004 reform of the Mudawwana (family code), which raised the minimum age of marriage for women to 18, introduced judicial divorce on the wife’s initiative (khul), restricted polygamy, and equalised parental authority, is widely regarded as among the most significant legislative achievements in Morocco’s post-independence history. The reform was made possible by a distinctive political conjuncture: sustained mobilisation by women’s organisations, the political marginalisation of Islamist opposition following the 2003 Casablanca bombings, and the personal endorsement of King Mohammed VI (Sadiqi & Ennaji, 2006; Charrad, 2001).
Political representation of women has been addressed through a combination of reserved seats, national lists, and party quotas, producing a gradual but uneven increase in parliamentary representation. Women held approximately 21% of seats in the House of Representatives following the 2016 elections, a figure that, while well above the regional average, remains far below gender parity and reflects the limited organic integration of women into party structures and local political networks (Sater, 2007; Inter-Parliamentary Union, 2021). At the local government level, the 2015 elections produced significant increases in women’s representation on communal councils, partly as a result of a legislative requirement that one-third of seats on municipal councils be allocated to women through dedicated lists (Benali & Moudden, 2016).
Formal legal progress coexists with persistent structural challenges. Violence against women, discrimination in inheritance law, and the practical inaccessibility of certain family law provisions continue to draw criticism from feminist organisations and international monitoring bodies. The intersection of gender with class, rural-urban divides, and regional disparities means that the experience of Moroccan women is highly heterogeneous: urban, educated, middle-class women have generally benefited most from formal rights reforms, while rural, less-educated, and poorer women face more significant barriers to accessing legal protections (Sadiqi & Ennaji, 2006; Ennaji, 2016).
8. External Dimensions: Western Sahara, Regional Politics, and International Pressures
The Western Sahara conflict represents the most consequential external dimension of Moroccan domestic politics, functioning simultaneously as a source of national mobilisation, and a permanent fixture of Moroccan foreign policy. Morocco occupied the former Spanish colony of Western Sahara in 1975 following the Green March organised by Hassan II, and has since administered most of its territory, claiming sovereignty not recognised by international law or the United Nations but supported by key partners including France and the United States (Jensen, 2005; Zunes & Mundy, 2010).
The Sahara issue exercises a significant disciplining effect on Moroccan domestic politics. The boundaries of legitimate political debate are defined in part by an implicit consensus that Morocco’s claim to the territory is non-negotiable, and critics — including journalists, bloggers, and political activists — who have questioned this consensus have faced criminal prosecution under provisions of the penal code relating to threats to territorial integrity. The 2020 US recognition of Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara, secured as part of the Abraham Accords normalisation of relations between Morocco and Israel, represented a significant diplomatic achievement for Rabat and further entrenched the monarchy’s role as manager of Morocco’s strategic interests (Maghraoui, 2021).
Morocco’s relations with the European Union, its primary trade partner and a major source of development assistance and remittances, are structured through an association agreement and bilateral arrangements covering trade, migration management, fisheries, and agricultural exports. The EU’s democracy promotion agenda has had limited effect on Moroccan political reform, partly because EU member states, particularly France and Spain, prioritise the strategic management of migration and security cooperation over normative pressure for democratisation. Scholars working on EU-MENA relations have identified Morocco as a paradigm case of the disjunction between the formal democracy-promotion rhetoric of EU external policy and the actual incentive structures shaping bilateral relations (Bicchi, 2007; Cavatorta & Durac, 2010).
9. Conclusion: Adaptive Governance and the Prospects for Political Change
Morocco’s political process, as this essay has demonstrated across multiple dimensions, is characterised by a distinctive and durable form of hybrid governance. The monarchy has shown remarkable capacity to adapt to changed circumstances — the 1999 royal transition, the 2003 terrorist attacks, the 2011 Arab Spring, the COVID-19 pandemic, shifting regional geopolitics — without relinquishing its structural centrality. Constitutional reform, electoral competition, civil society activity, and significant legislative changes across multiple domains have all occurred within a framework that consistently preserves the monarchy’s ultimate authority over major national decisions (Chtatou, 2023, May 27).
This essay has argued, following Heydemann (2007), Dalmasso (2012), and others, that this pattern is best understood as adaptive governance — a regime strategy that employs liberalisation instrumentally, tolerates and even encourages pluralism within defined limits, and responds to mobilisation not with simple repression but with a sophisticated combination of co-optation, institutional reform, and, when necessary, targeted repression of those who transgress structural limits. The comparison with the Arab Spring trajectories of Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, and Syria underscores the relative effectiveness of this strategy in terms of regime survival, though whether it constitutes a path to genuine democratisation or merely its indefinite simulation remains deeply contested (Chtatou, 2025, October 7).
Several dynamics may put pressure on this equilibrium in the coming decades. The youth bulge — a large, educated, urbanised, and digitally connected young population with high unemployment and frustrated aspirations — generates ongoing demand for more genuine political participation and economic inclusion. The weakening of traditional party organisations, the rise of new forms of social mobilisation, and the increasing salience of corruption as a political issue all create new sources of pressure. Climate change and water scarcity, to which Morocco is acutely vulnerable, will test governance capacity in ways that formal institutions may be poorly designed to address.
Ultimately, the prospects for political change in Morocco will depend on whether the monarchy can continue to manage these pressures through its established repertoire of adaptive strategies, or whether the accumulation of unmet demands generates mobilisation sufficient to force a genuine redistribution of political authority. The scholarly consensus, as of the mid-2020s, inclines toward continuity over transformation.
References
Amnesty International. (2018). Morocco: Free the Hirak Rif activists. Amnesty International.
Benali, K., & Moudden, A. (2016). Women’s political participation at the local level in Morocco: Progress and persistent barriers. Journal of North African Studies, 21(3), 412–429.
Bergh, S. I. (2012). Inclusive neoliberalism, local governance reforms and the redeployment of state power: The case of the National Initiative for Human Development (INDH) in Morocco. Mediterranean Politics, 17(3), 410–426.
Bicchi, F. (2007). European foreign policy making toward the Mediterranean. Palgrave Macmillan.
Boussaid, F. (2022). The 2021 Moroccan elections: An assessment of the electoral collapse of the PJD. Mediterranean Politics, 28(2), 281–302.
Brumberg, D. (2002). The trap of liberalised autocracy. Journal of Democracy, 13(4), 56–68.
Catusse, M. (2008). Le temps des entrepreneurs? Politique et transformations du capitalisme au Maroc. Maisonneuve & Larose.
Catusse, M., & Dazi-Héni, F. (2017). Monarchies and politics in the Arab world. Revue des mondes musulmans et de la Méditerranée, 140, 11–34.
Catusse, M., Destremau, B., & Verdier, E. (Eds.). (2010). L’État face aux débordements du social au Maghreb. Karthala.
Cavatorta, F., & Dalmasso, E. (2009). Liberal outcomes through undemocratic means: The reform of the Code de Statut Personnel in Morocco. Journal of Modern African Studies, 47(4), 487–506.
Cavatorta, F., & Durac, V. (2010). Civil society and democratization in the Arab world: The dynamics of activism. Routledge.
Charrad, M. M. (2001). States and women’s rights: The making of postcolonial Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco. University of California Press.
Chtatou, M. (2023, May 27). Morocco: Politics, culture, society, and economy – Analysis. Eurasia Review. https://www.eurasiareview.com/27052023-morocco-politics-culture-society-and-economy-analysis/
Chtatou, M. (2025, October 7). Aspects of clientelism due to neo-tribalism in Moroccan political system: Preeminence of this state of affairs and current protests by GENZ212 group – Analysis. Eurasia Review. https://www.eurasiareview.com/07102025-aspects-of-clientelism-due-to-neo-tribalism-in-moroccan-political-system-preeminence-of-this-state-of-affairs-and-current-protests-by-genz212-group-analysis/
Daadaoui, M. (2013). Enacting and contesting neoliberalism in Morocco: The PJD and the politics of reform. Journal of North African Studies, 18(5), 668–681.
Dalmasso, E. (2012). Surfing the democratic tsunami in Morocco: Apolitical society and the reconfiguration of a sustainable authoritarian regime. Mediterranean Politics, 17(2), 217–232.
Denoeux, G., & Gateau, L. (1995). L’essor des associations au Maroc. Monde Arabe: Maghreb-Machrek, 150, 19–39.
Entelis, J. P. (1989). Culture and counterculture in Moroccan politics. Westview Press.
Ennaji, M. (2016). Gender, politics, and feminism in Morocco. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 12(2), 204–222.
Fernández-Molina, I. (2011). The monarchy vs. the 20 February movement: Who holds the reins of political change in Morocco? Mediterranean Politics, 16(3), 435–441.
Hammoudi, A. (1997). Master and disciple: The cultural foundations of Moroccan authoritarianism. University of Chicago Press.
Heydemann, S. (2007). Upgrading authoritarianism in the Arab world. Saban Center Analysis Paper, 13. Brookings Institution.
Human Rights Watch. (2017). Morocco: Rif protesters face escalating crackdown. Human Rights Watch.
Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2021). Women in national parliaments: World classification. IPU.
Jensen, E. (2005). Western Sahara: Anatomy of a stalemate. Lynne Rienner.
Leveau, R. (1985). Le fellah marocain: Défenseur du trône. Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.
Madani, M., Maghraoui, D., & Zerhouni, S. (2012). The 2011 Moroccan constitution: A critical analysis. International IDEA.
Maghraoui, A. (2002). Political authority in crisis: Mohammed VI’s Morocco. Middle East Report, 218, 12–17.
Maghraoui, A. (2011). The nature of Morocco’s political reform after the Arab Spring. Journal of Democracy, 22(4), 1–11.
Maghraoui, A. (2021). Morocco and the Abraham Accords: The geopolitics of normalisation. Middle East Policy, 28(1), 53–68.
Monjib, M. (2011). The democratization process in Morocco: Progress, obstacles and the impact of the Islamist-secularist divide. Working Paper Series. Woodrow Wilson Center.
Pennell, C. R. (2000). Morocco since 1830: A history. Hurst & Company.
Sadiqi, F., & Ennaji, M. (2006). The feminization of public space: Women’s activism, the family law, and social change in Morocco. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 2(2), 86–114.
Sater, J. N. (2007). Civil society and political change in Morocco. Routledge.
Sater, J. N. (2016). Morocco: Challenges to tradition and modernity. Routledge.
Slyomovics, S. (2005). The performance of human rights in Morocco. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Storm, L. (2007). Democratization in Morocco: The political elite and struggles for power in the post-independence state. Routledge.
Vairel, F. (2014). Politique et mouvements sociaux au Maroc: La révolution désamorcée? Presses de Sciences Po.
Vermeren, P. (2009). Le Maroc en transition. La Découverte.
Wegner, E. (2011). Islamist opposition parties and the potential for EU engagement. ECFR Policy Paper.
Willis, M. J. (2012). Politics and power in the Maghreb: Algeria, Tunisia and Morocco from independence to the Arab Spring. Hurst & Company.
Zaki, L. (2011). La mobilisation du 20 février et la réforme constitutionnelle au Maroc. Pouvoirs, 145, 107–120.
Zerhouni, S. (2004). Morocco: Reconciling continuity and change. In V. Perthes (Ed.), Arab elites: Negotiating the politics of change (pp. 61–87). Lynne Rienner.
Zunes, S., & Mundy, J. (2010). Western Sahara: War, nationalism, and conflict irresolution. Syracuse University Press.
.jpeg)