For sixteen years, the question of Hungary joining the euro was not really a question at all. Viktor Orban's government was antagonistic towards Brussels, his party had deep eurosceptic roots, and his long-serving central bank governor argued publicly that it would be better to wait until Hungary's income had converged more fully with the rest of the EU. Analysts who examined the issue concluded that Hungarian euro adoption before 2040 was unlikely.
That calculus has changed following a landslide election victory that ousted former Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban. Peter Magyar's Tisza party won a two-thirds supermajority in Hungary's April 12 vote, ending Orban's sixteen-year rule, and has pledged to "choose Europe" — rebuilding trust with EU institutions and committing to eurozone membership by 2030. Finance minister nominee Andras Karman has confirmed that timetable, pledging to meet the Maastricht criteria by 2030.
Hungarian financial news outlet index.hu reported that the euro question "has gained new momentum in Hungary," with Karman having already indicated among his first steps that he would launch the accession process. According to experts cited by the publication, the move is "not only economically justified, but also strategically correct: the path to the euro can bring discipline, predictability and long-term stability — in other words, the very foundations on which sustainable convergence can be built."
Markets have noticed. Hungary's ten-year bond yield, which stood at 7% at the end of last year, has fallen to 6% since the election — a sign that investors are already pricing in some probability of the macro adjustment that euro accession would require.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said "Europe's heart is beating stronger in Hungary" on election night. Commission officials have already been in Budapest to begin work on unlocking approximately €17bn in EU funds frozen during the Orban era, with Hungary required to fulfil 27 so-called super-milestones to access the money. Talks are going to be tough as Magyar has only agreed to make four of the changes.
But it is going to be an uphill battle. As IntelliNews reported, most of Europe’s leading economies have severe economic problems and Hungary is one of them.
The numbers
Hungary currently does not meet any of the four quantitative Maastricht criteria in a sustainable manner. The five criteria for eurozone membership require: inflation no more than 1.5 percentage points above the average of the three best-performing EU member states; long-term interest rates within 2 percentage points of the same benchmark; a budget deficit below 3% of GDP; public debt below 60% of GDP; and exchange rate stability within the ERM II mechanism for at least two years.
Hungary fails on almost all of them. The Hungarian budget deficit came in at 4.7% of GDP in 2025 — nearly double the EU limit — according to the Hungarian Central Statistical Office's official Eurostat notification. The gross public debt-to-GDP ratio stood at approximately 74.6% in 2025, rising rather than falling, and well above the 60% ceiling. Inflation, while lower than its 2022-23 peaks, remains among the highest in the EU. Hungary has not yet joined ERM II, the exchange rate mechanism that is a prerequisite for euro entry.
The fiscal trajectory is moving in the wrong direction. Hungary's deficit is projected to widen further to 5.1 to 5.2% of GDP in 2026, driven by new household tax measures including personal income tax exemptions for mothers and expanded family allowances — popular policies that Tisza itself championed in opposition. GKI, Hungary's leading economic research institute, forecasts the general government deficit will hover around 6% in 2026.
Meeting the Maastricht criteria will require at least HUF3-4 trillion— equivalent to €8 to €11bn — in fiscal adjustment. That is a painful level of austerity for a government that simultaneously campaigned on doubling family allowances, expanding healthcare spending and cutting taxes for lower earners. Neither Karman nor Magyar spelled out during the campaign what specific austerity measures would be required for euro entry.
Magyar himself has already shown signs of moderating his timetable. While Tisza originally set 2030 as its target date, Magyar is now striking a more cautious tone, talking about 2031, and emphasising that a comprehensive budget review must first take place before a responsible decision on the accession date can be made.
The benefits
Analysts argue that the economic benefits of euro adoption for Hungary are real, though unevenly distributed across time. The gains would arise through several channels: removing exchange rate risk, lowering transaction costs, improving financial sector stability through ECB oversight and access to its lending facilities, reducing the country's risk premium, and potentially accelerating credit growth.
Some of these gains may be modest. 70% of Hungary's imports and exports are already invoiced in euros, many large firms hedge their foreign exchange exposure at low cost, and cross-border trade costs with eurozone countries are already very low, reflecting Hungary's deep integration into EU manufacturing supply chains. Exchange rate risk, while real, is smaller than in some peer economies.
The more significant benefits would come from importing Western Europe's monetary policy credibility — lowering inflation expectations, sustaining capital inflows and reducing real interest rates. These gains are greatest for economies without a long track record of low and stable inflation. Within non-euro Central and Eastern Europe, Hungary and Romania are the most prominent candidates. Moreover, a credible euro accession path would likely trigger country risk premium reductions and credit ratings upgrades, as has happened elsewhere in the region.
Hungary's debt-servicing costs are among the highest in the EU, with spreads between Hungarian government bond yields and German yields standing above 400 basis points. The ten-year bond yield would probably need to fall from its current 6% towards 4 to 5% to meet the convergence criteria — still a significant distance, but a journey markets appear to have already begun pricing.
Critically, much of this benefit need not wait for actual accession. The tightening of fiscal and monetary policy required to meet the Maastricht criteria would itself begin to compress bond yields and lower inflation expectations during the pre-adoption phase. In Bulgaria's case, most of the fall in bond yields occurred ahead of accession rather than after it.
The politics
The economic challenges, though daunting, may prove more tractable than the political ones. Joining ERM II requires the agreement of eurozone finance ministers and the ECB. Full euro entry requires approval by the Council of the EU. To be accepted, Hungary will need to convince eurozone partners on two counts: first, that euro entry enjoys cross-party political support sufficient to survive a future election; and second, that it is meeting not just the macroeconomic criteria but also improving its institutional framework — rule of law, judicial independence and media plurality among them.
According to the 2025 Eurobarometre survey, 75% of the Hungarian population fully supports the introduction of the euro — higher than in Bulgaria, which joined at the start of this year. However, 72% of respondents believe the country is not yet prepared for the transition.
Given that ERM II membership requires European Commission signoff, Brussels is likely to use the issue as leverage in its push to get Hungary to comply with its 27 reform requests. That could slow the whole process down.
The euro debate is unfolding in parallel as urgent negotiations between Budapest and the European Commission on unlocking the frozen EU funds are already underway. The institutional credibility needed for euro accession is largely the same credibility needed to access the frozen cash needed to reduce the budget deficit in the short-term.
Both Bulgaria and Croatia committed to significant institutional reforms ahead of and during their ERM II accession processes. Brussels is likely to apply the same template to Budapest — meaning the political and institutional reform process is not a precondition that can be deferred until after the economics are sorted. It must run simultaneously.
Magyar says he wants the euro by 2030 but analysts say a more realistic entry date is probably around 2034, assuming Tisza wins a second term in the next elections.
The 2030 target is therefore best understood as a credibility anchor — a signal of seriousness to Brussels and to markets — rather than a realistic operational deadline. Whether Magyar can reconcile the austerity required for Maastricht compliance with the spending promises that won him a supermajority is the central tension his government must resolve. The euro dream is real — and for the first time in years, genuinely possible. The work that needs to be done to get there remains formidable.
No comments:
Post a Comment