Tuesday, May 05, 2026

What shapes the content of our dreams?

A new study of researchers at the IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca reveals how personal traits and life experiences influence dream content


IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca





Why do our dreams sometimes feel vivid and immersive, while at other times they seem fragmented or difficult to interpret? A new study conducted by researchers at the IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca provides new insights into what determines the content of dreams, showing that both individual characteristics and shared life experiences play a key role in shaping what we dream.

The research, published in Communications Psychology, analyzed over 3,700 reports of dream and waking experiences collected from 287 participants aged 18 to 70. Over a two-week period, volunteers recorded their experiences daily, while researchers gathered detailed information about their sleep patterns, cognitive abilities, personality traits, and psychological characteristics.

Using advanced natural language processing (NLP) techniques, the team was able to quantitatively analyze the semantic structure of dreams. The findings reveal that dream content is not random or chaotic, but instead reflects a complex interplay between personal traits, such as tendency to mind-wander, interest in dreams, and sleep quality, and external events, including large-scale societal experiences like the COVID-19 pandemic.

When examining the words participants used to describe both their daily lives and their dreams, the research team observed how everyday life is transformed during sleep. Rather than simply replaying waking experiences, dreams appear to reinterpret them. Elements from daily routines, such as work environments, healthcare settings, or education, do not reappear as they are. Instead, they are reorganized into vivid, immersive scenarios, often blending together different contexts and shifting perspectives into unfamiliar landscapes. This suggests that dreams do not just reflect reality, but actively reshape it, integrating fragments of past experiences with imagined or anticipated ones to create novel, sometimes surreal, scenarios.

These transformations also vary across individuals. For example, individuals more prone to mind-wandering tended to report more fragmented and rapidly changing dream scenarios, while those who had a strong belief in the value, meaning, and significance of dreaming in general and of their dreams in particular, experienced perceptually richer and more immersive dream content. Analyses of data collected during the COVID-19 lockdown by researchers at Sapienza University of Rome, and compared with data gathered in the subsequent months and years by the IMT School team, showed that dreams during the lockdown were characterized by heightened emotional intensity and more frequent references to constraints and limitations, reflecting the broader social context. These effects gradually diminished over time, suggesting that dream content evolves in parallel with psychological adaptation to major life events.

“Our findings show that dreams are not just a reflection of past experiences, but a dynamic process shaped by who we are and what we live through,” explains Valentina Elce, researcher at the IMT School and lead author of the paper. “By combining large-scale data with computational methods, we were able to uncover patterns in dream content that were previously difficult to detect.”

The study also highlights the potential of artificial intelligence in dream research, demonstrating that NLP models can reliably capture the meaning and structure of dream reports with accuracy comparable to human independent evaluators. This opens new possibilities for studying consciousness, memory, and mental health in a scalable and reproducible way.

###

This work was supported by a grant from the BIAL Foundation (#091/2020) and by the TweakDreams ERC Starting Grant (#948891). The research was conducted at the IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, in collaboration with researchers from Sapienza University of Rome and the University of Camerino.

  

Dreaming while awake: Dream-like states are not confined to sleep





Institut du Cerveau (Paris Brain Institute)






By convention, wakefulness and sleep are regarded as physiologically distinct states. It is therefore tempting to assume that the images, sensations, and ideas that cross our minds while we are awake are fundamentally different in nature from those we experience while we sleep, and especially while we dream.

Yet this is far from obvious. Being awake is not synonymous with being attentive, fully aware of one's surroundings, or able to act and think rationally,” explains Delphine Oudiette, co-leader of the DreamTeam. “We now know that there is a continuum between wakefulness and sleep, with intermediate states such as mind-wandering or mind-blanking, during which certain regions of the brain may be asleep. What remained to be determined was whether the content of our thoughts also varies independently of our state of vigilance.”

To answer this question, the researchers chose to study sleep onset, the transitional stage between wakefulness and sleep.

Sleep onset allows us to capture, within a very short time span, fluctuations in our state of vigilance, from wakefulness to sleep, and to observe the mental experiences associated with them,” says Nicolas Decat, a PhD student at the Paris Brain Institute and first author of the study. “As we drift toward sleep, sensations, visions, and snippets of speech unfold—what are commonly called hypnagogic experiences. Tracing the evolution from ordinary thought to dream-like narrative can help us understand how a dream emerges.”

Nap experts to the rescue

To explore the transition between wakefulness and sleep, the team conducted a study with 92 participants who were accustomed to napping and trained to report the content of their thoughts upon interruption.

The researchers used an experimental setup inspired by Thomas Edison. According to legend, the inventor had a habit of falling asleep in his armchair while holding a heavy object, the fall of which would wake him at the threshold of sleep; he would then make use of the whirlwind of creative ideas that flooded his mind during this critical moment.

After each interruption of their nap—either by dropping a bottle held in the hand or by an alarm—participants were asked to describe their mental experience of the previous ten seconds, then rate it on four dimensions: bizarreness, fluidity, spontaneity, and perceived level of wakefulness. In parallel, their brain activity was continuously recorded with an EEG cap.

The researchers then let the data speak for themselves, applying a clustering algorithm that imposed no preconceived categories.

This data-driven approach was essential for us, because in research, there is no consensus on what hypnagogic experiences actually are. It was important not to bias this exploration with our own definitions or beliefs,” says Nicolas Decat.

A brain signature of dream-like states

The analysis revealed not the two mental states one might expect—dreaming and waking thought—but four. The first (C1) was characterized by fleeting recollections (“An image of my dad crossed my mind”); the second (C2), by a high level of connection to the surrounding environment (“I was listening to the street sounds”); the third (C3), by its bizarreness (“I saw images of small aliens”); and the last (C4), by a high level of voluntary control (“I was thinking about what I would do tomorrow”).

Each of these four mental states appeared across all three vigilance stages measured: wakefulness, sleep onset, and light sleep.

This is the major finding of our study. The mental states traditionally associated with dreaming can arise just as well when we are asleep as when we are awake. In other words, the content of our thoughts does not follow the boundaries between waking and sleep! One of our participants, while awake, reported seeing ants crawling on her body against a backdrop of crossword puzzles. Conversely, another participant mentally went through his schedule for the next day while he was fully asleep,” adds the researcher.

The team then went further, searching for neurophysiological markers specific to each mental state. By analyzing the complexity of the EEG signal, its spectral power, and the functional connectivity between brain regions, the researchers identified distinctive signatures.

They show that there is a specific brain signature for the “bizarre” C3 mental content—that is, the dream-like state. It is characterized by reduced long-range connectivity between the frontal and occipital regions of the brain.

This signature may well be the correlate of what we feel in such a state: lucid reasoning is overtaken by a whirlwind of vivid sensations characteristic of dreams,” suggests Nicolas Decat.

Mental activity and introspection

If dreaming is not specific to sleep, why do we have the impression that extravagant mental content occurs only in the depths of the night, when we are oblivious to the world around us?

This preconception probably stems from a memory bias. We mainly remember dreams that come with strong emotions or those to which we attach particular meaning. Yet it is just as common to dream that we are working!” notes Nicolas Decat. “Conversely, some people report that fanciful daytime thoughts—elusive, like fragments of a dream—sometimes surface during their everyday activities. Because these thoughts are seen as incongruous, they may well be more frequent than we imagine, but we tend to dismiss them."

Potential applications for sleep disorders

We are generally not very good at judging our own level of vigilance or describing the content of our thoughts. As a result, some people suffering from insomnia regularly complain of spending entire nights without sleeping, even though polysomnographic measurements taken in sleep clinics indicate otherwise.

This is what we call paradoxical insomnia: a mismatch between the patient's experience and clinical observations based on conventional sleep-stage criteria.

These criteria are probably inadequate. Our study proposes a new one—mental content— which may be better aligned with what these patients actually experience. Through this lens, some of them may spend an unusually long time in an alert state (C2), hyperconnected to the outside world, or, conversely, very little time in a dream-like state (C3), blurring the line between their waking and sleeping lives,” explains Delphine Oudiette. “Beyond giving patients' reports the weight they deserve, this approach paves the way to identifying objective markers of insomnia.”

No comments: