Monday, April 17, 2023

Europe's largest nuclear reactor enters service in Finland


Story by AFP • Yesterday 

Hours after Germany closed out its atomic era by turning off its last three nuclear reactors, the largest single reactor in Europe entered regular production in Finland, its operator said Sunday.


Europe's largest single reactor is expected to remain operational for "at least the next 60 years", according to site operator TVO.© Olivier MORIN

The next-generation Olkiluoto 3, now producing around 14 percent of the country's electricity, is expected to remain operational for "at least the next 60 years", according to the site's operator TVO.

Germany meanwhile officially ended decades of nuclear energy use by turning off its last three nuclear reactors on Saturday.

The Isar 2 reactor in the southeast of the country, the Neckarwestheim facility in the southwest and Emsland in the northwest were disconnected from the electricity network before midnight.

Europe's largest economy had been looking to leave behind nuclear power since 2002, but the phase-out was accelerated by former chancellor Angela Merkel in 2011 after the meltdown at the Fukushima nuclear plant in Japan.

In Finland, the European pressurised water reactor (EPR) was meanwhile put into regular service some 18 years after construction on the reactor began, and 14 years after it was originally scheduled to go into commercial production.

After it first reached full power in September last year, it was supposed to enter commercial production in December, but the start was pushed back several times during its testing phase.

- 'Trump card' -

Built by the French-led Areva-Siemens consortium, the reactor was first started up in December 2021 and connected to the Finnish power grid in March last year.

"Test production has been completed and regular electricity production started today," TVO said. "From now on, about 30 percent of Finnish electricity is produced in Olkiluoto," which already had two reactors.

With a capacity of generating 1,600 megawatts, Olkiluoto 3 is the single largest nuclear reactor in Europe, while Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia plant, with its six reactors, is the largest nuclear plant.

Finland had been hoping to rely on the new reactor for its electricity needs earlier this winter, given fears of energy shortages after Russia, a major supplier to Europe, invaded Ukraine and cut off gas exports in response to Western sanctions.

Jarmo Tanhua, CEO of TVO, in a statement called the "environmentally friendly electricity production" one of Finland's "top trump cards".

- Safety vs climate -

The EPR was designed to relaunch the European nuclear industry after the Chernobyl catastrophe of 1986, and was touted as offering higher power and better safety.

But several EPR projects have been plagued by delays and billions of dollars in cost overruns.

At the end of last year, France's state-owned energy group EDF had to announce another six-month delay for a new reactor being built at Flamanville, in northwest France, pushing back its projected start to mid-2024.

Hinkley Point in Britain and the Taishan plant in China have also suffered EPR production setbacks, cost overruns and delays.

The two EPR units in China have already entered commercial production, making Olkiluoto 3 the third to go into operation in the world.

Germany's decision to end use of nuclear power was popular in a country with a powerful anti-nuclear movement.

But some have criticised how the decision upped the country's dependence on coal, as it tried to manage an energy crisis caused by the war in Ukraine.

Markus Soeder, the conservative premier of the southern state of Bavaria, called on the federal government to let his state continue using nuclear power.

"As long as the crisis has not ended and the transition to renewables has not been completed, we must use every form of energy until the end of the decade," Soeder told the Bild am Sonntag on Sunday.

Nuclear technology has also seen renewed popularity as a way to reduce carbon emissions, with the Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg slamming the German move as "a mistake" if it meant burning more coal.

TVO hailed the Olkiluoto 3 reactor as "Finland's greatest climate act", adding that it would "accelerate the move towards a carbon-neutral society".

In Finland, a poll from May 2022 showed that 60 percent of Finns supported nuclear power.

Europe’s biggest reactor caps 14-year delay to begin commercial output


Bloomberg News | April 16, 2023 |

The three reactors of Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plant in Eurajoki, Finland. (Image by Hannu Huovila / TVO, Wikimedia Commons.)

Europe’s largest nuclear reactor has begun regular electricity production 14 years later than planned, delivering a boost to the region’s energy independence.


The 1,600-megawatt plant sitting on a rocky island that juts into the Baltic Sea on Finland’s west coast entered regular operation in the early hours of Sunday. Olkiluoto-3 is the first new atomic reactor in the Nordic countries since the mid-1980s, and the first in its home nation in more than four decades. About 30% of Finland’s electricity will now be produced on Olkiluoto.

Generating emission-free power for homes and businesses, the start coincides with a nuclear revival in Europe and the diversification of supplies away from Russia. France is among the leaders, just as the continent’s economic powerhouse, Germany, on Saturday disconnected its remaining three reactors from the grid to exit the technology altogether.

“We have seen this shift from many European countries to double down on energy security and ensure domestic supply after the invasion of Ukraine, and this new reactor will help a long way for Finland to achieve this,” said Fabian Skarboe Ronningen, a senior analyst at Rystad Energy AS.

Once set to be the world’s biggest reactor, the facility became a poster child of a nuclear industry promoting itself as a stable and virtually emissions-free power source as renewables expanded. Nuclear power had been out of fashion for years due to fears of accidents tainting the environment and on concerns over what to do with spent fuel, until worries over carbon dioxide emissions and climate change began to sway public opinion.

Finland, however, had bucked the trend, having planned its nuclear expansion without interruption since the early 2000s to overcome a lack of domestic supply of fossil energy and hydropower sources, plentiful in its Nordic neighbors.

Its owner Teollisuuden Voima Oyj also won parliament’s approval for a fourth unit, but ended up never building the project as it focused on getting the third reactor off the ground. Construction of Olkiluoto-3 began in 2005, but huge cost overruns and disputes between the operator and builders saw the start delayed many times from an original 2009 estimate. It was finally made critical — that is its chain reaction started — in December 2021 and the unit connected to the power grid in March 2022.

Fennovoima, a greenfield project with a reactor to be supplied by Gazprom, was terminated in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Meanwhile, state-controlled utility Fortum Oyj recently won permission to extend the lifespan of its two reactors on Finland’s south coast, and is looking into small modular reactors with a number of partners, including in Sweden, where the new government has opened the door to more nuclear power.

The three Olkiluoto units are set to produce almost a third of electricity generated in Finland.

“The opening of this unit will further strengthen the large net exporting role the Nordic region has to the continent,” especially combined with massive wind developments across Sweden, Finland and Denmark, said Rystad’s Ronningen. It will also help make prices more competitive for consumers, he said.



Finland is also building the world’s first permanent repository for spent nuclear fuel in Olkiluoto, deep into the bedrock. The facility will see encapsulated fuel stored in a network of tunnels that will eventually span 50 kilometers (31 miles).

For Finland, Olkiluoto-3 brings welcome domestic production after electricity imports from Russia ended about a year ago amid the fallout from Russia’s war. The cold Nordic nation managed to avoid blackouts that officials had warned were likely this winter, thanks to a 7% reduction in consumption and with the help of relatively mild temperatures.

The mild weather also helped send Nordic power prices down, following the trend elsewhere in Europe. They are now roughly where they were before the energy crisis started.

“The commercial start has been longed for and will finally put an end to all the delays the project has suffered over the years,” said Arne Bergvik, an energy strategist at consultant Sigholm Tech AB.

“It will directly help to replace the loss of power imports from Russia and has already cut Finland’s import needs from Sweden,” he said. Overall, together with other new production capacity it will help to cut prices in Finland, but also the Nordic region, he said.

The unit will run just shy of full power until the end of the year due to limitations on the grid set by the transmission system operator Fingrid Oyj.

(By Lars Paulsson and Kati Pohjanpalo)


Finnish EPR enters regular electricity production

17 April 2023


Test production has been completed at the Olkiluoto 3 (OL3) EPR in Finland and the plant has now started regular electricity production, operator Teollisuuden Voima Oyj (TVO) has announced. TVO said the reactor will soon be declared to be in commercial operation.

Olkiluoto 3 (Image: TVO)

OL3 attained first criticality on 21 December 2021 and was connected to the grid on 12 March 2022. The EPR, a 1600 MWe pressurised water reactor, then entered a phase of test production during which some 3300 tests were conducted and more than 9000 test reports collated.

The completion of test production was initially delayed after material that had detached from the steam guide plates was found in the turbine's steam reheater in May, which required inspection and repair work. Later, in October, damage was discovered in the internals of the feedwater pumps located in the plant's turbine island during maintenance and inspection work.

The plant was operated at full capacity for the first time in late-September last year.

TVO announced on 16 April that test production at the plant had been completed and regular electricity production has now started.

"This is a historical day, the benefits that we promised OL3 would bring to the Finnish society are realised," said Marjo Mustonen, TVO Senior Vice President for Electricity Production. "I am proud of all the nuclear professionals involved in the project."

OL3 will produce about 15% of Finland's total electricity consumption, while the Olkiluoto plant as a whole will generate about 30% of the country's electricity.

"The production of Olkiluoto 3 stabilises the price of electricity and plays an important role in the Finnish green transition," said TVO President and CEO Jarmo Tanhua. "The electrification of the society continues and environmentally friendly electricity production is undoubtedly one of the top trump cards that Finland has."

The first annual outage at OL3 is scheduled to take place in March 2024.

The Areva-Siemens consortium constructed the OL3 plant under a fixed-price turnkey contract. Construction began in 2005 but there have been various setbacks and delays.

TVO said the contractual end of the Olkiluoto 3 project will occur "once the analyses from the latest test production phase are completed and TVO is in a position to make appropriate decisions on the acceptance of the plant unit and the start of commercial operation. These decisions will be made in the near future".

The first EPR units came online at Taishan in China, where unit 1 became the first EPR to enter commercial operation in 2018 followed by Taishan 2 in September 2019. In Europe, EPRs are currently under construction in France and the UK: Flamanville 3, currently expected to start up in 2023 with commercial operation in 2024; and two units at Hinkley Point C, currently slated for grid connection in 2027 (unit 1) and 2028 (unit 2).

Researched and written by World Nuclear News

Volkswagen to partner on Indonesia EV battery ecosystem

Reuters | April 17, 2023

Image: Creative Commons

Volkswagen will build an electric vehicle (EV) battery ecosystem in Indonesia and will partner with miner Vale, Ford and China’s battery minerals producer Zhejiang Huayou Cobalt, the Southeast Asian country’s investment minister said.


Automakers are courting Indonesia for its raw materials used in producing EV batteries, which account for about 40% of a vehicle’s sticker price, aiming to cut costs and close the gap on EV market leader Tesla.

Minister Bahlil Lahadalia said on Sunday that Volkswagen, Europe’s biggest automaker, will work with Vale, Ford, Huayou, French miner Eramet and several Indonesian firms like Merdeka Gold Copper, the parent company of Merdeka Battery, and energy firm Kalla Group.

The partnerships would consist of joint ventures and supply raw materials, Bahlil said in a video statement from Germany, where an Indonesian delegation led by President Joko Widodo is attending industry fair Hannover Messe and meeting representatives of companies including German chemical giant BASF, Eramet and Volkswagen.

“Indonesia is an important and interesting country in terms of raw materials and we are in a positive exchange with the government and suppliers,” Volkswagen said in a statement.

Meanwhile, Bahlil said BASF had also expressed an interest in building a plant to produce battery materials, partnering with Eramet, in Indonesia’s north Maluku province, for a total investment of about $2.6 billion.

BASF and Eramet are jointly assessing the development of a nickel and cobalt hydrometallurgical refining complex in Indonesia, as was announced in 2020, and details would be announced once the assessment has been concluded, BASF said in an emailed response.

Bahlil said investment interest from European companies would allay concerns that Indonesia’s management of its mines “did not adhere to international standards.”

Widodo, who is widely known as Jokowi, told Reuters last month that Indonesia will improve monitoring of environmental standards for nickel mining, amid concerns over the impact of production of the metal.

Ford, Eramet, Kalla Group, Huayou, and Merdeka Gold Copper did not immediately respond to requests for comment. PT Vale Indonesia declined to comment.

Indonesia, which has the world’s biggest nickel reserves, has been trying to develop downstream industries for the metal, ultimately aiming to produce batteries and EVs.

Last month, Ford inked its first investment in Indonesia by joining Vale Indonesia and Huayou in a $4.5 billion nickel processing plant in Southeast Sulawesi.

Volkswagen last month said it plans to invest 180 billion euros ($193 billion) over five years in areas including battery production and raw material sourcing.

(By Stanley Widianto, Bernadette Christina, Siyi Liu and Victoria Waldersee; Editing by Ed Davies)

Teck shares surge above Glencore offer as other major miners eye metals unit


Bloomberg News | April 17, 2023 |  

Credit: Teck Resources Ltd.

Teck Resources Ltd. shares surged to a record Monday, exceeding Glencore Plc’s per-share takeover offer price for the first time, as other major mining companies show interest in acquiring the Canadian firm’s metals operations.


The stock gained as much at 9.2% in Toronto after Freeport-McMoRan Inc., Vale SA and Anglo American Plc were reported to be evaluating potential bids for Teck’s base metals business if the firm spins out its coal assets. Norman Keevil, the 85-year-old magnate who controls Teck through “supervoting” Class A shares, said in a Sunday statement that he’d support a transaction on the right terms after the separation.

Teck is racing to get enough investor support for the coal spinoff ahead of an April 26 vote while fending off an unsolicited $23 billion takeover offer from Glencore for the whole company. Keevil said that pursuing a deal for the entire company before separating its coal and metals businesses would rob shareholders of significant post-split value.

Teck’s stock rose 5.7% to C$63.90 at 10:36 am in Toronto, exceeding the value of Glencore’s offer of C$63.22 a share for the first time since the Swiss commodities giant proposed the deal three weeks ago.

Teck’s copper and zinc mines have long been admired by the world’s biggest miners, but Keevil’s resistance to sell has kept the company independent so far. Teck’s board has rejected two takeover proposals from Glencore this month, most recently after the company offered to add a cash component to buy Teck shareholders out of exposure to the combined coal businesses.

Glencore grabbed a momentum shift last week as Institutional Shareholder Services and Glass Lewis both recommended that investors vote against Teck’s spinoff plan and as Bloomberg News reported that China Investment Corp., which owns 10% of Teck’s Class B shares, favors Glencore’s proposal because it offers a quicker and cleaner exit from coal.

(By Joe Deaux)


The sale of Teck to a foreign buyer would be a loss for Canada, critics say

Some industry watchers say a hostile takeover of Canada's largest diversified mining company by a foreign entity would be bad news for the Canadian economy.

Swiss commodities giant Glencore is proposing to buy Vancouver-based mining company Teck Resources Ltd., an offer that Teck's board has rejected.

Some analysts say such a transaction would mean a "hollowing out" of Canada's mining industry, at a time when the mining sector could be poised for a boom.

Economist and former Scotiabank executive Patricia Mohr says she expects copper prices to skyrocket within the next few years, because copper is one of the critical metals used in the manufacturing of electric vehicles.

She says Teck is well situated to capitalize on that, with its massive new copper mine project in Chile as well as copper deposits in Canada.

Mohr and others say Teck is one of the last remaining big mining companies that is still controlled by Canadians, and losing that domestic control at this time would be a shame.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 17, 2023.

Teck controlling shareholder calls Glencore bid the wrong one at the wrong time

The controlling shareholder of Teck Resources Ltd. rejected Glencore's offer to buy the Canadian miner, but says he is open to talking about other possible deals once the company completes its own plan to split its business.

Teck chairman emeritus Norman Keevil says Glencore's proposal is the wrong one, at the wrong time. 

Teck's board has rejected Glencore's unsolicited takeover offer that would see shareholders receive a stake in a combined metals company as well as a choice of cash or shares in a company that would hold their merged coal assets.

Instead, the company is pursuing a plan it announced in February to split up its metal and steelmaking coal businesses into two companies, Teck Metals and Elk Valley Resources. The proposal will be voted on by shareholders later this month. 

Keevil says he would support a transaction – whether it be an operating partnership, merger, acquisition, or sale – with the right partner, on the right terms for Teck Metals after the separation takes place. 

Teck is controlled by the Keevil family, which owns the company's class A shares together with Japanese company Sumitomo. 

This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 17, 2023.

Companies in this story: (TSX:TECK.B)


Teck's biggest shareholder favours Glencore's coal plan

Teck Resources Ltd.’s biggest shareholder, China Investment Corp., currently favours Glencore Plc’s takeover plan that would allow investors to exit their coal exposure in return for cash, as the two miners race to win support for their competing proposals.

Glencore wants to buy Teck and then spin off the combined companies’ coal assets, but Teck says the deal is a “non starter” and is instead pressing ahead with an earlier plan to hive off its coal mines and focus on metals. Teck investors will decide on the Canadian miner’s split plan on April 26, in a high-stakes vote that is being framed by Glencore’s camp as a referendum on its takeover proposal.

China’s massive sovereign wealth fund owns 10 per cent of Teck’s Class B shares, putting CIC in a powerful position as Teck needs to secure two-thirds approval from both classes of shares, voting separately. While Canada’s Keevil family controls the fate of the company through “supervoting” Class A shares — and has rejected a deal with Glencore — the structure of this month’s vote means that investors with just a small percentage of total voting rights could end up scuppering Teck’s plan.

CIC currently favors Glencore’s proposal for the coal assets because it would allow for a cleaner exit for investors, according to people familiar with the matter. Glencore this week amended its earlier all-share proposal to add a cash component, offering to buy out shareholders that don’t want to keep exposure to coal.

The fund is considering a vote against Teck’s own proposal, although it has yet to make a final decision, said the people, who asked not to be identified discussing private information.

CIC may still seek a higher price from Glencore before supporting its offer, some of the people said. Senior Glencore executives have spoken with CIC executives to try and win support for its proposal.

CIC and Glencore both declined to comment. The Chinese fund initially bought a 17 per cent stake in Teck during the 2009 financial crisis, as the miner sought cash to cut its debt pile. CIC sold down some of its holding in 2017.

Teck shares rose 2.5 per cent by 9:52 a.m. in Toronto, while Glencore gained 2.4 per cent. 

Tension between the two companies escalated publicly in recent days, with less than two weeks on the clock until Teck’s shareholder vote. Glencore has said its current proposal would be dead if Teck’s investors approve the separation, while a vote against would leave the company without a clear strategy — potentially putting pressure on the board and Keevil family to engage with Glencore.

Teck on Thursday rejected Glencore’s amended proposal, and also announced changes to its own planned split by reducing the minimum term of the royalty paid to the Teck metal company, to three years from more than five earlier. However, Teck investors would still be left holding a stake in the steelmaking coal business, versus the cash exit being offered by Glencore.

Both companies are trying to win investor support. Teck Chief Executive Officer Jonathan Price and Glencore CEO Gary Nagle both held investor meetings in Toronto Thursday, with Nagle meeting or speaking with more than 100 investors.

Glencore won a significant boost Thursday when influential proxy advisory firm Institutional Shareholder Services said Teck shareholders should vote against Teck’s proposal.

Chile moves ahead with public-private lithium model via Codelco
Bloomberg News | April 17, 2023 


Chilean state-owned copper companies Codelco and Enami are holding talks with private-sector firms to develop lithium deposits in a country that holds the world’s biggest reserves of the battery metal.


Top copper supplier Codelco and Enami, which provides services to small- and mid-sized producers, will represent the state in new lithium projects given it will take “some years” to set up a separate national lithium company, Mining Minister Marcela Hernando said in an interview.

NOW READ: Chile’s Codelco sets up lithium subsidiary

The administration of left-leaning President Gabriel Boric expects to deliver this week its long-awaited lithium development strategy, in which companies will partner with the state in new projects. It also plans to present a bill to Congress this week to establish the state lithium company. But until that happens, the new joint-venture model will begin via Codelco and Enami.

“Each company has had conversations and some confidentially agreements have been signed,” Hernando said on Monday from the sidelines of an industry conference in Santiago.

ALSO READ: Tesla lobbying to secure lithium from Chile — report

Negotiations are separate to Codelco’s lithium exploration at the Maricunga salt flat, she said, adding that some of the prospective projects have already been the subject of exploration.

Chile is trying to attract private capital to the industry, at the same time as maximizing tax revenue, defending the environment and expanding downstream operations. Output is currently restricted to two companies — SQM and Albemarle Corp. — from a single, though giant, salt flat. The nation is losing market share just as demand for the key ingredient in electric-vehicle batteries accelerates.

(By James Attwood)

Sigma Lithium begins production at Grota do Cirilo project in Brazil

Reuters | April 17, 2023 | 

Credit: Sigma Lithium Corp.

Sigma Lithium Corp said on Monday it has started production at the Grota do Cirilo mine in Brazil, days after the government allowed it to sell and export the electric-vehicle battery metal.


An inaugural shipment of about 15,000 tonnes is expected in May, the Vancouver-based company said.

Production is expected to slowly ramp up in coming months and hit an annual rate of 270,000 tonnes of spodumene concentrate by July.

In 2021, Sigma agreed to supply at least 60,000 tonnes to LG Energy Solution Ltd starting this year. The remaining output is expected to be sold on the spot market to customers that will likely process the metal in China.

Earlier this year, media reports said Tesla Inc and Chinese lithium rival Ganfeng Lithium Group Co were considering making a bid for Sigma.

(By Arshreet Singh; Editing by Devika Syamnath)

Progress in production of isotopes from US legacy waste

14 April 2023


Some 75-100 times more doses of next generation alpha targeted therapy treatments will be available annually worldwide, compared with today, through a project to produce isotopes from legacy nuclear material at the US Department of Energy's (DOE's) Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), the project partners say.

An Isotek employee processing U-233 inside a glovebox at ORNL (Image: DOE EM)

Since 2003, Isotek has been responsible for safely and securely overseeing the inventory of uranium-233 and preparing its removal from ORNL. Since then, employees have transferred and dispositioned about half of the inventory. The remaining inventory requires processing and downblending prior to disposal, which began in October 2019. 

Isotek Systems (a subsidiary of Atkins Nuclear Secured), TerraPower and the DOE entered a public-private partnership in 2018. Through this partnership, Isotek is extracting the rare medical isotope thorium-229 for TerraPower Isotopes, a subsidiary of TerraPower, to advance promising cancer treatment research.

In 2021, TerraPower signed a collaboration agreement with Cardinal Health NPHS to produce and distribute TerraPower's actinium-225 product, which is generated using the thorium-229 extracted in ORNL. Actinium-225 will be used in drug trials involving targeted therapy for diseases such as breast, prostate, colon and neuroendocrine cancers as well as melanoma and lymphoma.

Isotek reinvested funds it received from TerraPower into the project, helping accelerate the work and begin processing uranium-233 sooner. Isotek purchased gloveboxes that allowed workers to begin processing canisters with lower levels of radiation. That approach enabled the extraction and delivery of rare isotopes quicker. This processing campaign, known as the Thorium Express Project, ran from 2019-2021.

An event was held on 11 April to mark the next phase of this effort: providing significantly larger quantities of medical isotopes to aid research and simultaneously eliminating an inventory of 1950s era uranium-233 nuclear material stored at ORNL.

The project provides the capacity to produce 500,000 cancer treatment doses per year. Currently there are only 4000 doses of these lifesaving therapies, known as targeted alpha therapy, available worldwide.

"This partnership is a success for all involved," said Jay Mullis, manager of DOE's Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management. "Through Isotek's innovative approach, we are able to accelerate one of our highest priority projects, spend less taxpayer dollars to complete the project and provide material that will greatly benefit the public in the future."

"Being able to extract potentially lifesaving medical isotopes prior to dispositioning highly enriched material is precisely what we mean when we say we engineer a better future for our planet and its people," said Joe St Julian, President, Nuclear, SNC-Lavalin. "This has created an aspiring mission for everyone involved. We are honoured to be assisting the DOE with this historic achievement."

"Thanks to DOE's vision and TerraPower's investment to cover costs associated with the extraction of selected medical isotopes, the lives of many families will be changed for the better," added Atkins Nuclear Secured President Jim Rugg. "This partnership has created an inspiring mission for our workforce, and we are honoured to be assisting the Department of Energy with this historic achievement."

ORNL's uranium-233 inventory is a legacy of Cold War-era operations and its disposition is the DOE Office of Environmental Management's highest priority at the Tennessee site. It is stored in Building 3019, which has been described as the oldest operating nuclear facility in the world.

Researched and written by World Nuclear News

Extract energy from used nuclear fuel, says environmental group

04 April 2023


If existing inventories of used nuclear fuel were recycled and repurposed as fuel for advanced fast reactors, it could generate zero-carbon electricity for Europe for up to 1000 years, according to international environmental campaign group RePlanet.

Report author Mark Lynas and RePlanet's Campaigns Coordinator Joel Scott-Halkes hug a canister of nuclear used fuel at the UK's Sizewell nuclear power plant (Image: RePlanet)

In its new report - What a waste: How fast-fission power can provide clean energy from nuclear waste - RePlanet says Europe's nuclear power reactors "have a long history of safe use, and have provided prodigious quantities of clean electricity for decades". However, it notes that they use less than 1% of the actual energy potential in the natural uranium used to make their fuel and irradiated fuel assemblies removed from reactors are considered 'nuclear waste'.

"While this nuclear 'waste' is not a serious environmental or health threat - it occupies trivial volumes compared to waste produced by other industries, and does not harm anyone if properly shielded and safeguarded - it does provide a political challenge, and is among the most oft-cited reasons for continued opposition to carbon-free nuclear power," the report says.

RePlanet says using this used fuel in a new generation of fast-neutron reactors would "eliminate it as a 'waste' concern via a carbon-free waste-to-energy process". It notes that most of the remaining leftover fission products would return to a level of radioactivity comparable to the original uranium ore within 200-300 years. "This means that current deep geological disposal strategies can be simplified and scaled back," it suggests.

The report found that using a calculation based mainly on current inventories of uranium, "there is sufficient energy in nuclear 'waste' to run Europe at current electrical power consumption" for between 600 and 1000 years.

It adds: "If unconventional uranium and thorium resources are considered in the global picture, nuclear fuel is essentially limitless: sufficient to supply a growing human civilisation with carbon-free energy for tens of thousands of years, and likely far longer".

The report notes that while the economics of fast reactors are currently unproven, if resources currently intended for deep geological disposal of used fuel were diverted instead into a fast reactor programme that would enable the re-use of that fuel, "this would turn a burden into a useful part of a legitimate circular economic activity".

Launching the report, RePlanet campaigners call on green parties of Europe to end their "dangerous and unscientific" opposition to nuclear energy. This, it says, is particularly important given the recent release of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Synthesis Report, which shows the world is rapidly running out of time to cut carbon emissions sufficiently to meet the Paris goal of 1.5°C. "RePlanet campaigners state that opposition to nuclear is tantamount to climate delayerism from fossil fuel corporations because it will increase carbon emissions".

"Current political narratives treat spent nuclear fuel like it is a waste product that needs to be buried underground, leaving a toxic legacy for future generations," said Mark Lynas, climate author and RePlanet co-founder. "Anti-nuclear campaigners never tire of repeating this mantra in their campaign to shut down nuclear plants irrespective of our climate emergency. However, we show in this RePlanet report that nuclear waste simply needs to be recycled efficiently in order to generate centuries of clean power for Europe and the UK. This material is not waste, it is fuel for the future."

"The IPCC has again made it extremely clear that we just have to get off fossil fuels, and that opposing clean energy technologies like nuclear puts the world on the path to irreversible climate breakdown," said RePlanet Secretary General Karolina Lisslö Gylfe.

RePlanet describes itself as "a network of grassroots charitable organisations driven by science-based solutions to climate change, biodiversity collapse and the need to eliminate poverty".

Researched and written by World Nuclear News


 

Cameco, Energoatom fuel deal implemented

13 April 2023


Cameco and Energoatom have signed the last agreement needed for the implementation of a programme to export all of Ukraine's uranium production for processing in Canada to produce fuel for Ukrainian nuclear power plants.

Kotin (on the left) and Gitzel sign the final agreement (Image: Energoatom)

The Agreement for weighing, sampling, storage, analysis and transportation of uranium oxide concentrate was signed in Canada on 11 April by Energoatom President Petro Kotin and Cameco President and CEO Tim Gitzel in the presence of Prime Minister of Ukraine Denys Shmyhal.

The document covers the physical delivery of uranium oxide from Ukraine to Canada, providing for the entire quantity of uranium mined by Ukraine's SkhidGZK to be supplied to Canada and for conversion and supply of natural uranium hexafluoride for enrichment.

Kotin described the agreement as a "landmark event" for Ukraine's nuclear industry. "It guarantees its stability and, as a result, a stable supply of electricity to citizens," he said.

A bilateral agreement signed in March will see Cameco meeting 100% of Energoatom's need for natural uranium hexafluoride from 2024 to 2035 for the nine nuclear reactors at the Rivne, Khmelnitsky and South Ukraine plants. The signature of the latest contract means the practical implementation of the agreements can now go ahead, Energoatom said.

Researched and written by World Nuclear News

Landmine explosions 'underline need for Zaporizhzhia protection agreement'

14 April 2023






  


International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi says that the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant's reliance on a single functioning external power line, and two landmine explosions near the plant, mean it is "more important than ever to agree" safety measures for the site. 
The IAEA's Grossi and IAEA experts toured the plant in March (Image: IAEA)

The six-unit nuclear power plant, Ukraine and Europe's largest, has been under Russian military control since the start of March 2022. It is near the frontline of Russian and Ukrainian forces and has been affected by shelling on a number of occasions over the past year, as well as having had to rely on emergency diesel generators for essential safety functions in periods when it has lost all external power.

In an update on the nuclear energy safety situation in Ukraine, Grossi said it was not clear what had caused the landmine blasts outside the plant's perimeter fence on 8 April and 12 April, but added that IAEA experts at the site continued to regularly hear shelling in the area.

Grossi, who has spent months seeking to get an agreement on safety protections for the plant, said: "We are living on borrowed time when it comes to nuclear safety and security at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. Unless we take action to protect the plant, our luck will sooner or later run out, with potentially severe consequences for human health and the environment."

The IAEA director general has held talks in Ukraine and Russia, and visited Zaporizhzhia itself, in the past few weeks, to seek to strengthen nuclear safety and security at the plant - the earlier plan to create a geographical protection zone around the plant has now been modified after failing to get agreement on its details of its size and how it would work. Instead he has said the aim is to get agreement on fundamental principles.

He added: "At a time of growing speculation about military offensives and counter-offensives in the region, it is more important than ever to agree that a nuclear power plant should never be attacked, nor used to launch attacks from. I will not rest until this has been achieved."

Four of the six reactors have been in cold shutdown, with two in hot shutdown - which allows them to provide heat to the plant and the nearby town of Energodar where many of the workers live. However the IAEA said that, with the weather warming, one of the two will now be transferred to cold shutdown. Some of the nine mobile boilers used to provide extra heating have also been switched off.

The issue of external energy supply to the nuclear plant - needed for essential safety systems and for cooling - continues to be a concern, with the plant relying on a single 750kV power line for the past six weeks. A back-up 330kV power line was damaged on 1 March on the other side of the Dnipro River in territory controlled by Ukraine and the IAEA reports Ukraine as saying that "military action in the area is preventing its experts from safely accessing the location".

The nearby Zaporizhzhia Thermal Power Plant operates the 330kV open switchyard through which back-up power has been provided to the nuclear plant and also operates the pumping stations which feed cooling water from the Kakhovska reservoir to the plant - the IAEA also reports that Russia's Rosatom has said it is working to restore three 330kV lines to the grid system in Russian-controlled territory and has agreed to provide access to the IAEA team.

In other updates, Grossi reaffirmed his concern for the situation for the nuclear plant's staff and their families. The IAEA says that more than a third of the original staff have left, some have signed contracts for the new Russian operation organisation and some remain employed by Energoatom, adding: "A significant number of the latter are now on-call, with the rest - mainly key operating staff - still working at the ZNPP, under the direction of Russian appointed management. In recognition of the staff shortages, operators from Russian NPPs have been receiving simulator and on the job training at the ZNPP. Once trained, they may be asked to come to work at ZNPP in case of staff shortages."

The IAEA also reports that two additional deliveries of equipment to Ukraine had taken place, taking the total to 15 during the conflict: "With the two latest deliveries, the Ukrainian nuclear regulator SNRIU and its technical support organisation, Energoatom’s Emergency and Technical Centre, the RADON facility in Kiev and the State Enterprise VostokGOK received vehicles, personal protective equipment and IT equipment that were either donated from Israel or procured by the IAEA using extrabudgetary contributions from Australia and the United States of America."

Researched and written by World Nuclear News

A guide: The end of Germany’s nuclear power

14 April 2023


This weekend sees the end of an era as Germany’s long journey away from generating power from nuclear takes place with the closure of its last three operating reactors.

Isar 2 was commissioned in 1988 (Image: Preussen Elektra)

What is happening?


The last three operating nuclear power reactors in Germany are being permanently shut down on 15 April. Isar 2, Emsland and Neckarwestheim 2, all pressurised water reactors, had been due to end their lives by the end of last year, but were allowed an extension for the winter following energy capacity concerns as a result of the Russia-Ukraine war.

How we got here - a timeline


This weekend’s final closures have been more than 20 years in the making and are the results of decisions taken by various coalition governments in the country. 

1960s/70s: Germany was for many years a world leader in nuclear energy, with the Kahl experimental nuclear power plant the first to generate electricity when it went into operation in 1960 with more than 30 power and experimental reactors up and running in the following three decades. As World Nuclear Association’s Information Paper on Germany says: "German support for nuclear energy was very strong in the 1970s following the oil price shock of 1974, and as in France, there was a perception of vulnerability regarding energy supplies."

1980s/90s: The Chernobyl accident led to a change in public and political attitudes to nuclear energy and the last new nuclear power plant was commissioned in 1989. When the country was unified in 1990, all the Soviet-designed reactors in the former East Germany were decommissioned - five VVER-440 units at Greifswald, plus unit 6, which was completed but not operated, and construction of a four-unit VVER-1000/V-320 power station at Stendal was halted.

1998: A coalition government was formed between the Social Democratic Party and the Green Party, which had partly grown out of the anti-nuclear movement. At the time, there were 19 operating nuclear reactors in Germany. The political parties' agreement included a commitment to change the law to phase out nuclear power.

2001: After more than two years of talks and negotiations, the German government and the main energy companies signed a compromise deal putting a cap of 2623 billion kWh on lifetime production by all 19 operating reactors, limiting the operating lives of reactors to an average of 32 years. It also prohibited the construction of new nuclear power plants and introduced the principle of on-site storage for used fuel.

2009: The new Christian Democrat (CDU) and Liberal Democrat (FDP) coalition government was committed to rescind the phase-out policy. The following year an agreement was reached to give eight-year extensions from the 2001-agreed dates for reactors built before 1980 and 14-year extensions to the later ones. The agreement included new tax measures and subsidies for renewables in return.

2011: Events at Fukushima led to the German government announcing an immediate three-month moratorium on nuclear power plans and then Chancellor Angela Merkel decided all pre-1980 nuclear power plants should be shut immediately - together with one unit already in long-term shutdown this amounted to 8336 MWe, about 6.4% of the country’s capacity. Although there was a safety assurance from the Reaktor-Sicherheitskommission review of the 17 reactors, the government decided to revive the previous government’s phase-out policy and close all reactors by the end of 2022. The Bunderstag passed the measures by 513 votes to 79 in June 2011 and approved construction of new coal and gas-fired plants as well as a rapid expansion of renewables - a policy package known as Energiewende.

2022: Russia’s war with Ukraine led to pressure to rethink, or at least delay, the phasing out of nuclear power with soaring energy prices and the end of gas supplies from Russia prompting fears of blackouts and energy security questions. Following a 'stress test ' of the grid in September 2022, the coalition government - which includes the Green Party - agreed to keep Emsland, Isar 2 and Neckarwestheim 2 on standby until mid-April 2023.

What has the German government said?


Steffi Lemke, Federal Minister for the Environment and Nuclear Safety said the phase-out made the country "safer" saying "with the shutdown of the last three nuclear power plants, we are entering a new era of energy production. So let’s continue to work on solutions for a nuclear repository and put all our energy into expanding renewable energies".

Robert Habeck, Federal Minister of Economics and Climate Protection, said that the phase-out was implementing the 2011 government’s decision and said "security of energy supply in Germany is and will remain guaranteed … the massive expansion of renewable energies in particular provides additional security. In 2030 we want to generate 80% of the electricity here in Germany from renewable energies". 

The priority now was to "complete the phase-out safely, including dismantling, and to advance the search for a repository for high-level radioactive waste and permanent solutions for low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste". 

What do opinion polls suggest the German public think? 


According to an opinion poll for broadcaster ARD, six out of ten people in the DeutschlandTrend survey oppose the nuclear phase-out with 34% in favour of it. That compares with the figures from June 2011 when 54% thought the policy was correct and 43% opposed it, ARD said.

How much electricity could the nuclear plants produce?


To take just one example, Isar 2, its operator Preussen Elektra said that each year it generates roughly 11 billion kWh of electricity, enough to supply 3.5 million households for a year, and in doing saving almost 10 million tonnes of CO2. Between the three of the reactors being shut this weekend, over their less-than 35-year lifetimes, according to World Nuclear Association, they have had load factors above 90% and generated 32.6 TWh of electricity.

In quotes: Reaction to the phase-out 


The Swiss Nuclear Forum’s President, Hans-Ulrich Bigler: "It is unfortunate that Germany, one of the world's leading nuclear energy nations, is abandoning this technology due to a government decision in the midst of an international energy and climate crisis. The workforce of the German nuclear power plants can be proud. With their work, they have reliably supplied Germany and its neighbouring countries with electricity over the past few decades, while preventing several billion tons of CO2 emissions."

He added: "Last year we were already able to see that the gradual phase-out of nuclear energy and the loss of gas capacities were also compensated for by more climate-damaging electricity production from coal. This is not a good sign for climate protection in Europe."

Open letter to German Chancellor Olaf Scholz signed by two dozen scientists and Nobel Prize winners, via Replanet: "In view of the threat that climate change poses to life on our planet and the obvious energy crisis in which Germany and Europe find themselves due to the unavailability of Russian natural gas, we call on you to continue operating the last remaining German nuclear power plants.

"We welcome the efforts of the German government to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Germany, a country of particular economic and political importance in Europe, in accordance with international agreements. However, in 2022, CO2 emission goals were exceeded by 40 million metric tons due to the increased use of coal-fired power plants resulting from the necessary cuts in natural gas consumption...

"The Emsland, Isar II and Neckarwestheim II nuclear power plants supplied a total of 32.7 billion kilowatt hours of low-emission electricity in 2022. German private households most recently consumed an average of 3190 kWh of electrical energy per year. This means that these three power plants can supply more than 10 million, or a quarter, of German households with electricity. The resulting reduction in the amount of electricity required from coal-fired power plants could save up to 30 million tons of CO2 per year. 

"In the past, other European countries also pursued plans to reduce their nuclear power generation capacities. In recent years, however, many of these countries have taken a different stance on nuclear power due to rising energy costs, which has been exacerbated by the most recent loss of Russian natural gas deliveries. France, the UK, Poland, the Czech Republic and the Netherlands, among others, are planning to build new nuclear power plants or are already doing so, while Belgium and Switzerland are seeking to extend the operating licenses of their plants."

Researched and written by World Nuclear News