Wednesday, May 27, 2026

NASA Provides Update On Moon Base Rovers, Landers, Missions



Artist’s concept of Phase 3 of NASA’s Moon Base. Credit: NASA


May 27, 2026 
By Eurasia Review

During a Moon Base event Tuesday at NASA’s Headquarters in Washington, the agency announced new contracts for lunar rovers for crew to drive and uncrewed cargo landers bound for the Moon. NASA leaders also shared target launch timeframes and upcoming milestones for the first Moon Base infrastructure and exploration missions to the lunar South Pole region ahead of Artemis astronaut landings.

“The Moon Base will be America’s and humanity’s first outpost on another celestial world,” said NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman. “Every mission, crewed and uncrewed, will be a learning opportunity as we return to the lunar surface, build the infrastructure to stay, and master the skills required to live and operate in one of the most demanding and dangerous environments imaginable. We will go for the science, for all we stand to gain from an economic and technological perspective, for the innovations that will make life better here on Earth, and to prepare for where we will inevitably go next. We are grateful for President Trump’s leadership, the bipartisan commitment from Congress, our industry and international partners, and the dedicated NASA workforce whose expertise enables us to achieve the near-impossible.”

NASA announced the first three Moon Base missions to begin building sustained operations: Moon Base I: Targeted for launch no earlier than fall 2026, this mission will use Blue Origin’s Blue Moon Mark 1 Endurance lander to deliver NASA payloads. Equipment will include the Stereo Cameras for Lunar Plume-Surface Studies instrument to study how thrusters interact with the Moon’s surface, and the Laser Retroreflective Array, which helps orbiting spacecraft determine a more precise location using reflected laser light. The mission will land on the Shackleton Connecting Ridge to demonstrate capabilities that reduce risk for future crewed Artemis landing missions in 2028.
Moon Base II: Planned for launch later this year, this mission will deliver more than 1,100 pounds of cargo on Astrobotic’s Griffin lander, including Astrolab’s FLIP rover, to mature mobility systems that inform future lunar terrain vehicle, or LTV, operations.Moon Base III: Also targeted for this year, this mission will fly the first payload selected through NASA’s Payloads and Research Investigations on the Surface of the Moon initiative. Its anchor investigation, Lunar Vertex, will fly on Intuitive Machine’s Nova-C Trinity lunar lander and study lunar swirls, or light spots on the surface of the Moon, to improve understanding of surface evolution and material behavior under extreme conditions. The mission will include payloads from ESA (European Space Agency) and the Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, reflecting commercial and international participation in Moon Base activities.

These missions are the first of more than a dozen missions that will be announced this year, each designed to generate operational data and reduce risk ahead of crewed Artemis surface activities.

NASA has awarded Astrolab $219 million and Lunar Outpost $220 million to build and deliver the first phase of LTVs. Awarded under the Phase 1 High Achievability Mission task orders of the Lunar Terrain Vehicle Services contract, these firm-fixed-price, performance-based milestones will enable NASA to deploy crewed and uncrewed mobility systems to the lunar surface by 2028 through the agency’s CLPS (Commercial Lunar Payload Services) initiative. Early surface mobility is a foundational component of the national space policy priority to create an enduring lunar presence.

Astrolab’s Crewed Lunar Vehicle, or CLV‑1, adapted from the company’s FLEX architecture, is a crewed rover designed to transport astronauts, carry supplies, and support remote operations, with a compact stowed configuration, a mass of about 2,000 pounds, and the ability to reach more than 6 mph on level terrain.

Complementing this capability, Lunar Outpost’s Pegasus is a lighter, mission‑ready evolution of its Eagle rover designed explicitly to meet NASA’s updated LTV requirements. Operational for up to a year and capable of manual, autonomous, or teleoperated driving at speeds more than 9 mph, Pegasus incorporates Apollo‑heritage technologies and builds on prototype and flight experience to deliver human‑centered mobility essential for establishing a sustained Moon Base.

Deploying multiple LTVs early in Moon Base development will accelerate technology demonstrations, inform site planning, and reduce operational risk ahead of crewed Artemis missions, enabling NASA to characterize terrain hazards, move materials, pre-stage resources, and mature systems needed for long-duration lunar exploration.

Over the next 18 months, the selected providers will finalize rover designs, conduct crewed evaluations, and qualify flight units for operational readiness, with the resulting LTVs supporting autonomous traverses, terrain preparation, scientific investigations, technology demonstrations, and astronaut transport.

As Moon Base efforts advance, NASA will expand opportunities for additional vendors through on‑ramp competitions, fostering a robust, sustainable approach to lunar mobility and strengthening national priorities in space capability.

To deliver these rovers to the Moon’s South Pole region, NASA awarded Blue Origin $188 million with an option period worth $280.4 million for two task orders, which includes an option period based on initial phase performance. NASA can choose to extend the task order for payload delivery.

This competitive procurement, executed under the CLPS 1.0 indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity framework, the CX-2 task order represents a strategic investment in lunar exploration and will play a critical role in enabling mobility and infrastructure development for sustained lunar operations, marking a significant step toward establishing a permanent human presence on the Moon.


Building on the successes and lessons learned from CLPS 1.0, the agency also outlined how the next generation of cargo landers under CLPS 2.0 will continue to deliver payloads to the lunar surface and lunar orbit, supporting NASA’s ambitious goals for sustained lunar operations. This next phase introduces enhanced flexibility, allowing NASA to order turn-key delivery services or start accepting delivery of CLPS hardware for integration into its own missions. The final CLPS 2.0 request for proposal was released on May 15, with responses due on Tuesday, June 30.


Moonfall update

The agency also shared new updates on MoonFall, a mission that will send four drones to fly short hops on the lunar surface as they survey potential landing sites for Artemis astronauts. NASA‘s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California has been developing the design and testing prototype hardware and has selected Firefly Aerospace to build the spacecraft that will transport the drones from Earth orbit to the Moon. Launch is targeted for 2028.

The drones will independently land on the lunar surface and then gather high-resolution imagery of hard-to-reach terrain over the course of a single lunar day. After each drone’s final flight, its survive-the-night payload will continue to operate for several months, marking a sustained U.S. presence at the lunar South Pole.

More robotic missions to come

Finally, NASA stated in the coming weeks that a selection of additional CLPS 1.0 task awards, issued during the agency’s Ignition event, for Moon Base payloads and technology demonstrations, is forthcoming. In the coming months, there also will be additional opportunities to compete for CLPS 1.0 and 2.0 task orders as Phase 1 technology demonstrations are defined and planned for Moon Base missions.

During the update, NASA leadership reiterated that establishing a sustained lunar presence is aligned with the agency’s broader exploration strategy, supported by increased launch cadence, expanded industry partnerships, and agencywide coordination.


As part of the Golden Age of innovation and exploration, NASA will send astronauts on increasingly difficult missions to explore more of the Moon for scientific discovery, economic benefits, and to build on our foundation for the first crewed missions to Mars.


Everything you need to know about NASA’s plan to build a permanent Moon base


By Theo Farrant & AP
Published on


NASA has unveiled an ambitious plan to turn the Moon into a long-term human outpost, with the first robotic missions targeting 2026.

Less than two months after the record-breaking Artemis II mission, NASA has revealed new details about its plan to build a long-term human presence on the Moon.

The agency says it is already ordering landers, rovers and drones for the first phase of what it calls “Moon Base” - a programme designed to support astronauts living and working on the lunar surface for extended periods.

Here's everything you need to know about NASA's announcements.

What is NASA’s Moon Base plan?

NASA wants to build a permanent lunar base near the Moon’s south pole as part of its Artemis programme.

The project will happen in multiple phases over the next decade, starting with robotic cargo missions before astronauts arrive later this decade.

NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman said the agency is already planning "three moon base missions" with more to come. "These represent the first of more than a dozen missions we expect to announce," he said.

In this photo provided by NASA and captured by the Artemis II crew from lunar orbit, the moon eclipses the sun on 6 April 2026. Credit: NASA via AP


The ultimate goal is to create a long-term human presence on the Moon while testing the technology needed for potential future missions to Mars.

NASA Deputy Associate Administrator Lori Glaze said the lunar base would support "long duration stays, expanded robotic and human capabilities, and an enduring presence on the lunar surface".

Where will the base be built?

The first missions will target the Moon's south pole, particularly a strategic area called the Shackleton Connecting Ridge.

Scientists believe the region could contain water ice trapped in permanently shadowed craters - an incredibly valuable resource that future astronauts could use for drinking water, oxygen and rocket fuel.

The first phase of the Moon Base plans focuses on robotic missions. Blue Origin, the company founded by billionaire entrepreneur Jeff Bezos, will send its Mark 1 Endurance Lander to the Moon no earlier than autumn 2026, delivering cargo and scientific payloads.

A second mission will use an Astrobotic Griffin lander to transport more than 500 kilograms of equipment, including Astrolab’s FLEX rover. NASA says this will be the "largest commercial payload delivered to the lunar surface ever".

A third mission will focus on science experiments selected through NASA's PRISM initiative.

When will astronauts return to the Moon?

NASA is currently targeting Artemis IIIfor mid-2027.

That mission will test docking systems between NASA’s Orion spacecraft and lunar landers developed by Blue Origin and SpaceX.

After Artemis III, NASA said it plans to send one mission to the Moon every year. Artemis IV, set for early 2028, will see astronauts transfer from Orion to a commercial lunar lander that will bring them to the surface.

“For those waiting patiently, the grand return is close at hand and we will not slow down,” Isaacman said. “We are really just getting started.”

What will astronauts actually do there?

Initially, astronauts are expected to stay for short missions while testing rovers, habitats and surface operations. Later phases could include pressurised vehicles that astronauts can live and travel in while exploring the lunar surface.

NASA Moon Base Program Executive Carlos Garcia-Galan said astronauts could “hop on the Pressurised Rover and basically work and explore the Moon”.

Will people live on the Moon permanently?

Eventually, that is NASA's goal. The agency says the second phase of the project - expected between 2029 and the early 2030s - will begin building permanent infrastructure like power systems and habitation modules.

"And then eventually," Garcia-Galan said, "we’ll be able to say, hey, we’re permanently here and we’re not giving it up."



NASA lays out moon base plans including buggies, landers and drones


NASA on Tuesday outlined the first phase of a sprawling moon base plans on Tuesday, less than two months after the Artemis II's record-breaking lunar flyaround, with visualisations of landers, rovers and drones. The space agency also awarded hundreds of millions of dollars in contracts to four US companies.


Issued on: 27/05/2026 
By: FRANCE 24


A simulation of an operation conducted jointly by robots and astronauts at Cape Canaveral (Florida, USA) on May 26, 2026. © NASA

NASA is already ordering landers, rovers and drones for a sprawling moon base, less than two months after the Artemis II's record-breaking lunar flyaround.

The space agency outlined the first phase of its moon base plans on Tuesday, awarding hundreds of millions of dollars in contracts to four US companies.

A 3D model of the modules made at Cape Canaveral (Florida, USA) on May 26, 2026. © JAXA/Toyota


Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin will provide a pair of landers to deliver moon buggies to the lunar surface, at a spot near the moon’s south pole. These so-called lunar terrain vehicles will be built by Astrolab and Lunar Outpost. Firefly Aerospace, which landed successfully on the moon last year, will deliver the first drones to the moon.

Drones will be used to set up the bases as in this 3D model made on May 26, 2026 at Cape Canaveral (Florida, USA). © NASA

All this hardware is ideally supposed to arrive before the first Artemis astronauts land on the moon, planned for as early as 2028.

During April's Artemis II mission, four astronauts flew around the moon, traveling deeper into space than the Apollo moon crews did during the late 1960s and early 1970s. For next year's Artemis III, another team of astronauts will practice docking NASA's Orion capsule in orbit around Earth with the lunar landers being developed for crews by Blue Origin and Elon Musk's SpaceX.

Model of lunar modules powered by an engine fueled by radioactive isotopes made at Cape Canaveral (Florida, USA) on May 26, 2026. © NASA


NASA is targeting Artemis III for mid-2027, with a landing by two astronauts following as soon as 2028. The moon base's second phase, from 2029 into the early 2030s, will start building up the permanent infrastructure, including a power grid. As for when the base will be ready to support astronauts for extended periods in specialized permanent habitats, that's expected sometime in the 2030s, during the third phase.

“Then we'll be able to say, 'Hey, we're permanently here and we're not giving it up,'” said NASA's moon base program executive Carlos Garcia-Galan.


A 3D projection of the future NASA base installation on the lunar south pole made at Cape Canaveral (Florida, USA). © NASA


Garcia-Galan envisions a moon base sprawling over hundreds of square miles, with a perimeter marked by drones, dubbed MoonFall, stationed at the corners.

NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman said these territory markers are meant to be respectful of other countries' spacecraft and equipment that might be nearby. He expects reciprocity in the matter.
A rendered visualisation of a module intended for astronaut movement on the lunar surface, created at Cape Canaveral (Florida, USA) on May 26, 2026. © NASA

The goal of the moon base is to encourage a lunar economy while conducting scientific research and laying the foundation for a Mars expedition, Isaacman stressed.

“For those waiting patiently, the grand return is close at hand and we will not slow down,” Isaacman said. “We are really just getting started.”

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)




 

‘The Simpsons’ writer who 'predicted' Trump presidency makes 2028 White House bid

‘The Simpsons’ writer who predicted Trump presidency makes 2028 White House bid
Copyright Fox - Disney

By David Mouriquand
Published on

Dan Greaney, the Emmy-winning writer who wrote The Simpsons episode 'Bart To The Future', which “predicted” a Trump presidency 16 years before it happened, is now apparently running in 2028.

The Simpsons writer who “predicted” Donald Trump’s presidency has announced that he is running for President in the 2028 US election.

Sure, why not.

Dan Greaney has written several episodes of the beloved animation series, including one which contributed to the show’s reputation that it foretells the future.

The infamous episode in question is “Bart To The Future”, which sees Lisa as President of the United States. In the episode, which aired a full 16 years prior to Trump’s presidency, she addresses her advisor and says: “As you know we’ve inherited quite the budget crunch from President Trump”.

This led many to go back and sift through Simpsons episodes to uncover other instances when the show’s jokes “predicted” the future. In some cases, they were eerily accurate.

Now, Greaney is looking to follow in Trump’s footsteps.

In a video posted on Instagram, the four-time Emmy winner is dressed as a wizard and describes himself as a “self-proclaimed prophet”, before outlining America’s political problems.

“Trump, Vance, the billionaires, careerists, and cowards in both parties have turned their backs on [the US],” he said. “It’s money, power, and security for them, but not for you.”

He continued: “In America, the government is supposed to work for everyone. Democracy for all, accountability for all, prosperity for all. We must restore this. I’d love to help, but I’m not a lawyer. I’m just a self-proclaimed prophet… who went to law school, graduated, passed the bar… Wait! I am a lawyer!”

He then discards the wizard costume and reveals himself to be suited and ready for The White House.

“Screw it, I can be a politician,” he exclaims. “I’m running for president. My platform: America for all. Let’s do this.”

Check it out for yourselves:

No matter ridiculous the announcement may seem, it does make Greaney one of the first to announce their bid for the 2028 election.

The comedy writer appears to be advocating for universal healthcare and a return to morals, according to his Instagram page. According to a press release from Greaney’s campaign: "His platform includes restoring democratic norms alongside progressive policies such as universal healthcare and the Green New Deal, unified under the campaign’s central idea of building an America that works for all.”

Stranger things have happened...

Under current law, Trump cannot run for a third term. No president is allowed to serve more than two terms in office. However, Trump has repeatedly threatened to run again, saying last year that he has not ruled out the possibility and that he would "love to do it".

The Trump Organization has already been selling red caps that read "Trump 2028", seemingly promoting him as a candidate in the election. Aye, Caramba!

The next US Presidential elections take place on 7 November 2028.

U.S. Federal Investigations And Seizures Of Voting Records – Analysis


This article provides background on the constitutional and statutory framework underlying federal investigations of elections, summarizes investigations by the Trump Administration and legal action surrounding demands for and seizures of state and county voting records, and offers considerations for Congress. 

Constitutional Background

States have the initial and principal responsibility for administering elections in the United States, including in determining voter eligibility. The federal government maintains a significant role in elections, such as in enforcing federal laws protecting election integrity.

The states’ primary role in congressional elections is partially set out in Article I, Section 4, Clause 1, of the U.S. Constitution, the Elections Clause: “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof[.]” The Elections Clause also references Congress’s power to “at any time by Law make or alter” state regulations, which the Supreme Court has sometimes described as an “override” authority. Article I, Section 2, Clause 1, the Voter Qualifications Clause, further empowers the states to decide who is qualified to vote in federal congressional elections. For presidential elections, Article II, Section 1, Clause 4, provides that Congress may determine the “Time” of choosing presidential electors and the day the electors shall cast their votes. The states hold the power to appoint presidential electors to the Electoral College and decide how those appointments are made under Article II, Section 1, Clause 2, the Electors Clause.

Congress does not have general regulatory authority over state and local elections, but it may still exercise its power over them in several contexts. For example, Congress has authority to prevent unconstitutional voter discrimination in a state or local election. In addition to its Article I powers, Congress’s authority to legislate regarding these issues derives principally from the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. Relying on its Spending Clause authority under Article I, Congress also may condition the receipt of federal funds for state or local elections on compliance with federal requirements.

The Constitution does not articulate a specific role in federal elections for the President. However, the Take Care Clause, in Article II, Section 3, Clause 1, provides that the President “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” The clause imposes a duty that implicates powers to enforce the laws that Congress enacts, including the enforcement of statutory criminal prohibitions.

Select Statutory Background

While states and localities generally determine their own election practices, Congress has set minimum requirements in federal law. For example, the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA) provides that states must “conduct a general program that makes a reasonable effort to remove the names of ineligible voters from the official lists of eligible voters” due to death or residency change. The NVRA contains public disclosure provisions requiring states to maintain and make available for public inspection certain records concerning the implementation of programs for ensuring the accuracy of voter rolls. The Attorney General may bring civil actions to enforce the NVRA. 

The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) sets additional requirements, including that states maintain “in a uniform and nondiscriminatory manner, a single, uniform, official, centralized, interactive computerized statewide voter registration list” containing the names and registration information of all registered voters. HAVA further requires states to ensure voter registration records are “accurate and are updated regularly,” to make “a reasonable effort to remove registrants who are ineligible to vote,” and to ensure eligible voters are not removed in error. HAVA provides that the Attorney General may bring a civil action against any state or jurisdiction “as may be necessary to carry out the uniform and nondiscriminatory election technology and administration requirements[.]” 

The Civil Rights Act of 1960 (CRA) requires election officers to retain and preserve records “relating to any application, registration, payment of poll tax, or other act requisite to voting in such election” for 22 months, and to provide the Attorney General such records “for inspection, reproduction, and copying” upon demand in writing with a statement of the basis and the purpose of the demand.

Recent Executive Branch Actions

The Trump Administration has issued executive orders (E.O.s) with the stated purpose of protecting the integrity of elections and initiated investigations into the 2020 and 2024 presidential elections, including by demanding statewide voter registration lists with detailed voter registrant information and ballot records. 

Executive Orders

In March 2025, President Trump issued E.O. 14248, “Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections.” The E.O. includes several Administration policies with regard to state voter registration lists and other election records. For example, Section 2(b) of the E.O. requires, among other things, that “the Department of Homeland Security, in coordination with the DOGE [Department of Government Efficiency] Administrator,” review federal immigration databases alongside state voter registration lists and other state records “concerning voter list maintenance activities,” including by subpoena. Section 5 further orders the Attorney General to consider withholding federal grants from states that do not enter into information-sharing agreements or otherwise refuse to cooperate with enforcement of the E.O. While provisions of the E.O. have since been enjoined from implementation by multiple federal courts, Section 2(b) and Section 5 are outside of the scope of those injunctions. One federal district court declared that in the course of implementing Section 2(b), the Administration must comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act, “including its requirement that agencies provide at least 30 days’ notice and opportunity for comment for any new or intended ‘routine use’ of information stored in an agency’s system of records.” For further information on the March 2025 E.O. and legal challenges, consult this Legal Sidebar.

In March 2026, President Trump issued E.O. 14399, “Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections.” The E.O. requires, among other things, that federal officials compile and transmit to each state a “State Citizenship List” for upcoming federal elections, and prioritize investigations and prosecutions of state and local officials who issue ballots to individuals not eligible to vote. Two dozen states have filed a legal challenge to the E.O., arguing that the E.O. would unconstitutionally “usurp” power over elections belonging to the states and Congress. 

Investigations of Voter Registration Lists

Citing the President’s March 2025 E.O. along with the NVRA, HAVA, and CRA, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has requested voter information from most states, the District of Columbia, and some local governments, and sued to enforce compliance with various demands. In complaints against states and their election officials, DOJ alleged that the states had failed to provide copies of the statewide voter registration lists, information concerning the implementation of programs and activities for ensuring accuracy, and other election records. In the underlying requests and the complaints, DOJ demanded detailed voter registrant information, including registrants’ “full name, date of birth, residential address, and either their state driver’s license number or the last four digits of their Social Security number.” In various complaints, DOJ alleged that failure to comply with the requests violated the NVRA, HAVA, and the CRA. Several federal district courts have dismissed DOJ’s suits seeking voter registration data. Some of the decisions have reasoned that while federal laws set certain requirements with regard to registration, they do not compel the disclosure of the voter records demanded by DOJ. DOJ has appealed decisions, and cases in other states remain pending as of the date of this writing. Other states have reached agreements to share voter lists, some of which have been challenged by civil rights groups.

In another dispute, a DOJ lawsuit alleged that the North Carolina State Board of Elections (NCSBE) violated HAVA by using a voter registration form prior to 2024 that did not require an applicant to provide a driver’s license number or the last four digits of their Social Security number. The NCSBE reached a settlement in September to reregister voters missing this information. 

Investigations and Seizures of Ballots 

On January 28, 2026, DOJ’s Federal Bureau of Investigation seized over 600 boxes containing the 2020 election ballots of more than 500,000 voters in Fulton County, Georgia. The search warrant and supporting affidavits alleged violations of Title 52, U.S. Code, Sections 20701 and 20511—criminal prohibitions relating to recordkeeping under the CRA and election interference under the NVRA, respectively—and sought records including “[a]ll physical ballots from the 2020 General Election in Fulton County”; “[a]ll tabulator tapes for every voting machine used in Fulton County”; “[a]ll ballot images produced during the original ballot count” and the recount; and “[a]ll voter rolls[.]” 

Fulton County election officials filed a motion in federal court seeking the return of the seized election records, arguing that the federal government’s search lacked probable cause and violated the Fourth Amendment and other legal requirements, and that the factors under Rule 41(g) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedurerequired a return of seized property. The district court denied the motion, finding that the plaintiffs had not met the exacting standard required under circuit caselaw for granting a motion to return seized property. The court noted that the seizure of ballots of a closed and certified election did not interfere with the ability to conduct the past election, nor “will hinder the State’s ability to conduct future elections.”

Officials in Arizona have stated they complied with a subpoena seeking 2020 Maricopa County election records. In April 2026, DOJ demanded all 2024 election “ballots (including absentee and provisional), ballot receipts, and ballot envelopes” from Wayne County, Michigan, citing the CRA and election fraud laws. Wayne County has replied that it does not have custody of the records.

Considerations for Congress

Congress may amend existing statutory authorities, like the CRA, NVRA, or HAVA, or create new federal election authorities within the bounds of the Constitution as interpreted by the Supreme Court. H.R. 22, the SAVE America Act, which passed the House on April 10, 2025, would amend the NVRA to establish additional state voter list maintenance requirements, among other provisions. Congress may also facilitate federal investigations of elections by encouraging greater information sharing between state, local, and federal officials. In light of challenges in protecting election systems, Congress may consider creating new requirements for securing election records and limiting the appropriate use of such data. Congress may consider limiting the federal role in elections, such as by restricting the circumstances under which the executive branch can obtain and consolidate voter information. Congress may also provide additional resources and guidance to state and local election officials.


  • About the author: Jimmy Balser, Legislative Attorney