UNCONCERNED CONTRARIAN PARTY

'Impossible situation': Experts worry about changes to COVID-19 testing in Alberta

CTV News Edmonton
Updated Dec. 24, 2021 

Changes to Alberta's COVID-19 testing protocols raised concerns about the lack of an accurate case count as rapid antigen tests take on a more significant role, experts warn.

The province's top doctor announced changes to COVID-19 testing Thursday as active cases increase.

Alberta Health now recommends that you no longer book appointments to get a PCR test if you have a rapid testing kit.

If you are symptomatic and test positive on a rapid test, notify any close contacts from the last 48 hours and isolate for 10 days or until symptoms resolve — whichever is longer.

If you're symptomatic and test negative on a rapid test, wait 24 to 48 hours and take a second rapid test. Should that test come back negative, remain in isolation until symptoms are gone.

The exceptions to the new testing recommendations are if you do not have access to rapid tests, work in high-priority settings like health care, or have a high-risk condition.

"As Omicron is spreading farther and faster than anything we've ever seen before, and no one in Canada will be able to maintain PCR testing for every community case with mild symptoms," said Dr. Deena Hinshaw on Thursday.

ACTIVE CASES WON'T HAVE THE SAME MEANING

The testing changes mean case count data will no longer be an accurate snapshot of COVID-19 spread in Alberta, Dr. Lynora Saxinger, infectious diseases specialist, told CTV News Edmonton.

"The explosive spread means that the numbers are going to become somewhat unreliable or at least not able to be compared to prior numbers in the way that we are used to," Saxinger said.

"The fact that rapid tests aren't currently notifiable and tracked means that there will be a lot happening that we aren't directly aware of.”

"People can still access PCR testing, especially if they don't have access to rapid tests," Hinshaw said. "So we're not blocking access to testing at this point; we're simply not recommending it because we need to use every tool at our disposal."

The lack of case count is just another unknown added to an already lengthy list, Saxinger said, including how Omicron will impact the province.

"It would be preferable to have a reliable case count, especially because we don't really know what is going to happen with the relationship between cases and hospitalizations and other severe outcomes," she said.

When it comes to the holiday season, Saxinger said the increase in social gatherings at a time when testing is changing could pose risks, especially to older people.

Preliminary data from health experts in the U.K. suggests that people with the Omicron variant of the coronavirus are 50 per cent to 70 per cent less likely to be hospitalized than those with the Delta strain.

The British public health agency announced the preliminary findings, calling them "a small ray of sunlight."

Saxinger says while the early data is encouraging, that study relied primarily on data gathered on younger people.

"We still don't know how likely Omicron is to be severe in older people because of most of the spread in the U.K. and the U.K. data that looks reassuring is mostly of a younger population," she said.

"All those multigenerational (holiday season) gatherings could really actually shift the age group of newly infected Omicron cases, and we genuinely don't know what to expect from that from the point of view of severity," the University of Alberta associate professor added.

BETTER PLANNING

The Official Opposition says the change in testing will leave Albertans in the dark when Omicron is spreading and poised to place more pressure on the health care system.

"The fact now that we are putting people in a position where they are expected to do their testing at home, when they may not have a record if they have to apply for compensation on long COVID or other things that may impact them personally," said David Shepherd, NDP health critic.

Shepherd added that ontop of concerns about compensation or WCB claims, for many Albertans, rapid test kits remain out of reach.

"This is deeply concerning, and it shows a real failure on the part of our government," Shepherd said.

British Columbia announced a similar shift in posture towards testing on Friday as it declared its laboratories were being overwhelmed and could not keep up with demand.

"The spread of this variant is so aggressive that I actually really can't imagine having tooled in advance to have capacity for all the testing that is going to be needed," Saxinger said.

"This seems like a practical response to an impossible situation on the testing side."

For Saxinger, the problem remains that while there are new restrictions in place, many large gatherings can still proceed.

"I really do think we are going to be seeing really intense transmission over the next couple of weeks."

OTHER INDICATORS

In a statement to CTV News, Chris Bourdeau, Alberta Health spokesperson, said that the province is not alone in implementing new strategies for COVID-19 testing.

"This is something every jurisdiction across the world is facing and managing," Bourdeau said.

The province will rely on other indicators, like wastewater data and hospitalizations, to assess the continued impact COVID-19 has on the province, Bourdeau added.

"We expect the change in testing to be in place indefinitely," he said. "We will adjust at a point when the situation allows us.

"As Dr. Hinshaw said yesterday, with cases growing exponentially, we must begin to conserve testing capacity, receiving PCR testing for higher risk groups."

Alberta Health says the province received 14.7 million tests from the federal government, with 10.3 shipped out so far, including 6.5 million to businesses and 3.8 million to AHS clinics and pharmacies to distribute to Albertans.

The remaining 4.4 million tests are committed to public distribution, Bourdeau said.

The province expects to receive another 4.3 million tests by the end of the month, with no "firm" delivery dates set.

'Brought the system to its knees': Experts warn about what a fifth wave could mean for health care in Alberta

Experts are warning about the effect of the fifth wave on the health care system (File)


Kerry McAthey
CTV News Edmonton
Updated Dec. 24, 2021 

With Omicron now the dominant strain of COVID-19 in the province, health-care workers are bracing for what another wave will mean for the system.

According to doctors and other officials, the decisions Albertans make over the next few days could dictate what hospitals look like in the new year.

“If we get together with multiple households, this will increase the transmission of Omicron significantly,” Dr. Darren Markland said.

During the fourth wave, Alberta ICUs were swamped with COVID-19 patients. Thousands of surgeries and other procedures were cancelled province-wide, and the Canadian military was called in to help.

“I think we have to plan as if we’re going to have a wave [just] as bad as the fourth one,” said Heather Smith, president of the United Nurses Association.

“It literally brought the system to its knees.”

Smith said protecting that system is about keeping people out of the hospital.

ROOM FOR OPTIMISM

New studies about Omicron are demonstrating the ways it differs from the Delta variant of COVID-19.

“Some of the early data that we’ve seen [shows] it doesn’t seem to cause as severe cases in terms of hospitalization, especially if you’re vaccinated,” said critical care specialist Dr. Raiyan Chowdry.

“There is room for some optimism.”

Preliminary research from the U.K. shows those infected with Omicron are 50 per cent less likely to wind up in hospital than with Delta.

However, the strain is proving to be much more contagious.

“The sheer number of people means that [while] they may not get as sick, there’s still going to be huge numbers who will,” Smith said.

ICU specialists like Dr. Markland add that because the province’s health care system is already under lingering strain from the fourth wave, Omicron could be devastating.

“After wave after wave, the ship gets more battered,” he said. “We’re not going to sink, but we’re certainly taking on water.”

With files from Touria Izri

Alberta Premier facing criticism for Wuhan bat soup comments in year-end interview

WUHAN BATS DID NOT OPEN ALBERTA FOR SUMMER

TYLER SHANDRO MINISTER OF HEALTH

      

KENNEY UCP FUNDRAISING HAT

By JOSH RITCHIE

Posted Dec 24, 2021

Alberta Premier Jason Kenney is under fire for comments he made during a year-end interview that was published online earlier this week.

The article saw Kenney do a one-on-one with Rick Bell of Postmedia where he talked about the current state of the pandemic, his government’s response to COVID and what’s to come in the months ahead.

But, when asked about what the province can expect moving forward, Kenney had some controversial remarks on the topic.

“Who knows what the next variant that gets thrown up is? I don’t know. And what’s the next bat soup thing out of Wuhan? I don’t know.

“I’ve learned from bitter experience not to make predictions about this.”

His response immediately caught the attention of people on social media, including Alberta’s Opposition Leader, Rachel Notley.

“We have workers, we have Albertans young and old, students, public servants who actually continue to live in fear,” explained Teresa Woo-Paw with the Act2EndRacism National Network. “They are actually concerned about their personal safety.”

Following the backlash, the premier’s office went on defence, saying in a statement to CityNews:

“The Premier’s comment obviously referred to the widely reported theory that the first human infection of COVID-19 resulted from transmission between an infected bat and a human in the Wuhan region of China. The World Health Organization has concluded that direct spread from bats to humans in Wuhan is a ‘likely’ scenario to explain the beginning of human transmission.

“It is obviously ridiculous to suggest that these widely reported scientific theories are ‘racist.’”

But, to many, the ridiculous part of this all is to suggest that Kenney’s remarks are not racist.

“His word is actually causing an adverse impact on a group of people. That is racial discrimination,” said Woo-Paw.

– With files from CityNews reporter Sarah Chew

Calls for Alberta premier to apologize for comments made in year-end interview | Watch News Videos Online (globalnews.ca)

 

What did Jason Kenney say? Alberta premier’s racist comment sparks backlash online


Alberta premier Jason Kenney recently came under fire after making alleged racist comments against the Chinese community during a year-end interview with Postmedia‘s Rick Bell.

During the interview, the Canadian politician addressed concerns related to the new variants of COVID-19 and talked about China’s Wuhan province, where the virus was first detected:“Who knows what the next variant that gets thrown up is? I don’t know. And what’s the next bat soup thing out of Wuhan? I don’t know. I’ve learned from bitter experience not to make predictions about this.”\

Still no apology from Jason Kenney for his racist comments in a newspaper column that ran yesterday.

These comments spread hate and fear at a time when, perhaps more than ever before, Albertans need to come together.

Premier, apologize and denounce racism in all forms. #ableg

The remarks were immediately condemned on social media, with other political leaders like Rachel Notley and Mary Ng demanding an apology from the premier.

Several social media users took to Twitter to call out the premiere for his controversial statements:

I still remember being accused of having SARS when I came back from the Philippines back in 2002-2004. I was a kid, getting yelled at for eating bats and snakes. It was racist then. It’s still racist Jason Kenney.

You have failed the people of Alberta. You’ve consistently made wrong decisions in this health crisis, and racist comments like these are a reminder of why you are unfit to lead Alberta @jkenney. https://t.co/TZJ8krjSFx

Jason Kenney is racist & unfit to lead Alberta @jkenney

This is an unbelievably racist statement. Throughout this pandemic, Jason Kenney and the UCP have used dog whistle language. Now they are being openly racist. #ableg #yeg #abracism https://t.co/5DqqaO4hiB

This is the second time during the pandemic that @jkenney has deliberately targeted the Asian community with racist comments. Time to step down or be removed. You are an embarrassment to normal Albertans. twitter.com/KevinCTV/statu…

Jason Kenney making racist comments is a feature, not a bug.

All I want for Christmas is for the premier of my province to maybe refrain from trading in dog whistle, anti-Asian sentiment. https://t.co/oWXFPhlKfa

Jason Kenney made a racist remark; I am not surprised. Albertans who voted for him and his party knew this about him and many will probably vote for him again. #ableg

 

Mary Ng, the Liberal Member of Parliament for Markham-Thornhill, took exception with Kenney's "irresponsible" use of "anti-Asian racist tropes."

Even Calgary’s own Andrew Phung from the popular TV show Kim’s Convenience chimed in.

Actor and comedian Andrew Phung called Kenney's racist comments the latest in the long list of the premier's failures.

China's 'social credit' system ranks citizens and punishes them with throttled internet speeds and flight bans if the Communist Party deems them untrustworthy

Alexandra Ma,Katie Canales
Fri, December 24, 2021

China's property sector is central to its economy.Getty Images


China has been rolling out a system that ranks its citizens based on their "social credit."


People can be punished if they drive badly, buy too many video games, or steal.


It's not a unified, nationwide system, but China plans on eventually making it mandatory for everyone.


The Chinese Communist Party has been constructing a moral ranking system for years that will monitor the behavior of its enormous population — and rank them all based on their "social credit."

The "social credit system," first announced in 2014, is "an important component part of the Socialist market economy system and the social governance system" and aims to reinforce the idea that "keeping trust is glorious and breaking trust is disgraceful," according to a 2015 government document.

The rankings are decided by China's economics planning team, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), the People's Bank of China, and the Chinese court system, according to the South China Morning Post.

The system can be used for individual people, but also for companies and government organizations. The private sector, including the burgeoning tech world in China, has their own non-governmental scoring systems that they implement, as Wired reported.

For example, Sesame Credit, which is owned by Jack Ma's Ant Group, uses its own unofficial scoring system for its employees, such as studying shopping habits, according to the think tank Merics.

The program has been piloted for millions across the country in recent years, as CNBC reported, and was expected to become fully operational and integrated by 2020.

But at the moment the system is piecemeal and voluntary, though the plan is for it to eventually be mandatory and unified across the nation, with each person given their own unique code used to measure their social credit score in real-time, per Wired.
Bad driving and debt could get you downgraded in the social ranking system

china beijing street crosswalk people
Beijing, China.Donat Sorokin\TASS via Getty Images


Like private credit scores, a person's social score can move up and down depending on their behavior.

The exact methodology is a secret — but examples of infractions include bad driving, smoking in non-smoking zones, buying too many video games, and posting fake news online, specifically about terrorist attacks or airport security.

Other potential punishable offenses include spending too long playing video games, wasting money on frivolous purchases, and posting on social media.
Punishments include travel bans and slow internet

China has already started punishing people by restricting their travel, including banning them from flights.

Authorities banned people from purchasing flights 17.5 million times by the end of 2018, according to the National Public Credit Information Centre, as the Guardian reported.

They can also clamp down on luxury options — many are barred from getting business-class train tickets, and some are kept out of the best hotels.

A train station in China.Yang Bo/China News Service via Getty Images

The eventual system will punish bad passengers specifically. Potential misdeeds include trying to ride with no ticket, loitering in front of boarding gates, or smoking in non-smoking areas.

According to Rachel Botsman, an author who published part of her book on tech security on Wired in 2017, the government will throttle your internet speeds as a punishment, though the exact mechanics still haven't been made clear.

According to Foreign Policy, credit systems monitor whether people pay bills on time, much like financial credit trackers — but also ascribe a moral dimension.

You or your kids could also miss out on the best jobs and schools — seventeen people who refused to carry out military service in 2017 were barred from enrolling in higher education, applying for high school, or continuing their studies, Beijing News reported.

And in July of 2018, a Chinese university denied an incoming student his spot because the student's father had a bad social credit score for failing to repay a loan.

You could also get your dog taken away. The eastern Chinese city of Jinan started enforcing a social credit system for dog owners in 2017, whereby pet owners get points deducted if the dog is walked without a leash or causes public disturbances.

A man with his dogs in Jinan in 2016.Visual China Group via Getty Images/Visual China Group via Getty Images

Those who lost all their points had their dogs confiscated and had to take a test on regulations required for pet ownership.

Naming and public shaming are other tactics. A 2016 government notice encourages companies to consult the blacklist before hiring people or giving them contracts.

People will be notified by the courts before they are added to the list, and are allowed to appeal against the decision within 10 days of receiving the notification.

Li Xiaolin, a lawyer who was deemed "untrustworthy" after not fulfilling a court order in 2015, was placed on the list and was unable to purchase plane tickets home while on a work trip, Human Rights Watch reported. He also couldn't apply for credit cards.

This video, posted by freelance journalist James O'Malley, includes an example of an announcement on a bullet train from Beijing to Shanghai warning people not to misbehave — or else their "behavior will be recorded in individual credit information system."




'Bad' citizens are punished, but the system also rewards 'good' citizens

People with good scores can speed up travel applications to places like Europe, Botsman said.

An unidentified woman in Beijing told the BBC in 2015 that she was able to book a hotel without having to pay a cash deposit because she had a good score.

The outlet also reported that Baihe, China's biggest dating site now owned by Jiayuan, is boosting the profiles of good citizens.

Citizens with good social credit can also get discounts on energy bills, rent things without deposits, and get better interest rates at banks.

These perks were available to people in Rongcheng, in Eastern China, where the city council rolled out a social credit system for its citizens featured in Foreign Policy in 2018.
The system has been likened to dystopian science fiction

China's social credit system incorporates a moral edge into the program, which is why many have compared it to some level of dystopian governance, such as in George Orwell's "1984" in which the state heavily controls every aspect of a citizen's life.

But despite that — Human Rights Watch called the system "chilling," while Botsman called it "a futuristic vision of Big Brother out of control" — some citizens say it's making them better people already.

A 32-year-old entrepreneur, who only gave his name as Chen, told Foreign Policy in 2018 that "I feel like in the past six months, people's behavior has gotten better and better. For example, when we drive, now we always stop in front of crosswalks. If you don't stop, you will lose your points. At first, we just worried about losing points, but now we got used to it."

Covid is here for good, scientists say. The rest remains unpredictable.




Evan Bush
Thu, December 23, 2021

SEATTLE — Early in the pandemic, many people seized on the hope that Covid-19 could be stopped in its tracks and buried for good once vaccines rolled out.

But hope for a zero-Covid country fizzled for most scientists long ago.

“Everyone has stopped talking about getting rid of Covid,” Dr. Elizabeth Halloran, an epidemiologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, said of her fellow researchers. “It’s not going away, and that means it’s going to be endemic.”


Most scientists now expect the virus to circulate indefinitely with lower and more predictable case numbers — a status known as endemicity. That would make the coronavirus like many other viruses that humanity has learned to deal with, such as influenza. It remains unclear, however, whether the coronavirus will remain a greater health risk than other endemic respiratory viruses.

There are some indications that government and public health officials are already operating with that idea in mind. The latest wave of the omicron variant has served not only as a reminder that the coronavirus is still mutating in unexpected ways, but also as a signpost: Federal messaging and local government action, which once focused on stopping the virus’s spread and relied upon extreme measures like local lockdowns, is now centered on reducing risk and allowing the vaccinated and the boosted to go on with relatively normal lives with precautions.

With Covid expected to become a fixture — and considering how fast the omicron variant spreads — some infectious disease experts now think most everyone could be infected during their lifetimes.

“It seems to me it’s almost inevitable you’re going to become infected,” said Dr. Francis Riedo, an infectious disease physician at EvergreenHealth, a hospital system in Kirkland, Washington. “The real question is how severe that infection is going to be.”

Even if endemic Covid becomes inevitable, however, it doesn’t mean people should stop taking preventive measures, experts say. Instead, they are beginning to consider a future in which Covid precautions, such as masking and occasional encouragement to socially distance, could become somewhat common. Vaccinations would remain central, as would precautions for vulnerable people.

And in the near term, as the omicron variant rages, it remains critical that people — including the vaccinated — try to avoid becoming infected now, when the pandemic is spiking. The health care system could soon be under siege, hospital workers are exhausted, and there aren’t enough treatment tools, like monoclonal antibodies and antiviral pills.

“There’s definitely a responsibility to the community,” Riedo said. “If you look at the country, there are huge swaths unvaccinated and not infected yet but will be. And what can we do to help them?”

A virus becomes endemic as people grow overall immunity to a disease through vaccination or infection. Waning immunity keeps the virus from dying out completely.

For an endemic disease, every person who is infected transmits the virus to one additional person on average. But it’s a “dynamic equilibrium,” Halloran said, and the prevalence of the virus can wax and wane depending on factors like the season.

No model can predict how soon society could make the transition to endemicity, said Sergei Maslov, a professor of bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, whose research suggests that ever-changing social interactions prevent pathogens from dying out and pushes them toward becoming endemic.

“Mutations are pretty unpredictable at this point, and we don’t know what will happen after omicron,” he said.

It typically takes a few years for a new viral pathogen to move from pandemic to endemic, said Maslov’s research partner, Alexei Tkachenko, a scientist at Brookhaven National Laboratory in Long Island, New York.

“Eventually, yes, there will be some sort of repeated pattern, an average level of prevalence of the epidemic,” Tkachenko said. “We cannot say it will be so low we don’t care.”

Pfizer executives said this week that they believe Covid will become endemic by 2024. The director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Dr. Anthony Fauci, wrote last week with colleagues that the virus is unlikely to be eradicated and that they expect “periodic outbreaks and endemics.” A survey in February in the journal Nature found that nearly 9 of 10 researchers working on the coronavirus thought Covid would become endemic.

Endemic diseases often settle into more predictable and stable patterns. Influenza, for example, spikes somewhat predictably during colder months. But researchers can’t say for sure how damaging an endemic level of Covid could become.

“The really open question for me — or maybe for public health or all of us — is when it becomes endemic and people become infected, how much severe disease and death does it cause?” Halloran said.

An endemic version of Covid could look somewhat similar to the flu, according to a projection by Trevor Bedford, a computational biologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.

Bedford said he thinks endemic Covid could mean that most people would be infected about every three years, on average, with most cases quite mild.

Bedford’s back-of-the-napkin math — when the delta variant was the primary strain — suggested that 50,000 to 100,000 people could die in the U.S. every year from endemic Covid, according to a presentation he shared this fall. In the decade that preceded Covid, influenza caused 12,000 to 52,000 deaths a year, according to statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Long Covid, a poorly understood disease that follows infection, could increase the social costs of the endemic Covid.

Riedo, an infectious disease physician, said the comparison to flu makes sense. Vaccination will be key to protecting vulnerable groups.

“With Covid, even if you’re vaccinated, some people are going to die, and the average age of those individuals is in their 80s,” Riedo said. “They have multiple comorbidities. They can’t tolerate a small perturbation in their physiology.”

Those who are unvaccinated and die of Covid tend to be younger by 10 to 15 years on average, with fewer health problems, Riedo said, adding that the same holds true for influenza.

Endemic Covid won’t affect everyone equally. Immunosuppressed people might not benefit as much from vaccinations and could need additional protection to reduce the risk of endemic Covid.

Riedo outlined a potential treatment plan for immunosuppressed people, who make up 4 percent to 5 percent of the U.S. population: “Every six months, you go in to get antibodies, and you have rapid tests available to them, and if you’re positive, you start them on new medications,” such as drugs that help inhibit viruses from reproducing.

If risks are more significant during spikes of endemic Covid, layers of protection, like masks and distancing, could still prevent infection and help manage risk, particularly for at-risk populations.

“Covid is not the first time they’ve had to think about double layers of protection or had to think about how to protect themselves during epidemics or environments that put them at risk,” said Erin Sorrell, an assistant professor of microbiology and immunology at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. “Getting the common cold, the flu, measles, getting anything would be an issue for their health and safety.”

Not every virus becomes endemic or remains that way.

Strict control measures of the first SARS virus, which didn’t spread asymptomatically, allowed health officials to effectively eradicate it. The virus that causes smallpox was eradicated through worldwide vaccination efforts.

Some experts still believe eliminating the coronavirus country by country could be possible, although it would take huge investments and the costs might not outweigh the benefits.

Four other coronaviruses circulate in humans and cause common colds. Scientists suspect that they might have developed out of pandemics before they weakened in severity as people gained immunity.

But this is the first time researchers are measuring a coronavirus on a path toward becoming endemic. More surprises could be in store.

“Who would have thought of omicron?” Halloran said. “Is that in your crystal ball?”

Henry Ford’s Bizarre Social Program To Control The Personal Lives Of Workers


Elizabeth Puckett
Thu, December 23, 2021
⚡️ Read the full article on Motorious

This disgusting program allowed the Ford Motor Company a hand in everything from their employees' love lives to the cleanliness of their homes.

Henry Ford was a man whose personal life and general personality were fraught with more than a few flaws that would be considered borderline horrendous these days. If historical accounts of the man are to be believed, it would appear that he was a terrible racist, sexist, and had a particular distaste for immigrants. However, his father was an Irish immigrant. Of course, this is not to say that the Ford Motor Company wasn't a massive innovator within the automotive industry, but these extreme values even made their way into how Ford did business.

The Ford Sociological Program was a sector of the Ford Motor Company dedicated solely to ensuring their employees' moral and social righteousness. This came from Ford changing its pay rate from $2.34/day(about $65.08/day in 2021) to $5/day($138.97/day in 2021) to reduce their terrible turnover rate of around 370% in 1913. This was an effective policy as it led to the reduction of employees, leaving the company at just 16% in 1915. So what was so wrong with this new Company initiative if the numbers seemed to show positive results?

Apart from the fact that this raise was entirely unsustainable for Ford in the long term, which eventually led to the program's ending. It also came with many downsides in the form of constant monitoring of the employees' personal lives and personal value requirements. The staff within the sociological department consisted of 50 investigators, which would eventually grow to over 200, who would make regular visits to employee households to check up on their homes, children, and spouses. If you were below the age of 22, you needed to be married, and if you were a woman, you weren't eligible for the raise unless you were a single mother.

Patriotism is a beautiful thing, and you should always be proud of your country. However, Henry Ford took things a little too far as he set stringent guidelines around how his employees could act, talk, and believe. If you weren't what he described as a "good American," you would have been blocked from all of the promotion options that other workers could obtain provided they followed the strict values imposed upon by the company. This was after, of course, your pay was reduced to the previous $2.34/day. If your behavior didn't shape up within six months, you would be fired.

'Excluded, humiliated and degraded’: Case of Quebec teacher removed for wearing hijab is ‘disturbing’ for all Canadians


A person wearing a mask with a graphic protesting Quebecs Bill 21 records on their phone during a rally against that law, after a teacher was removed from her position because she wears a hijab, in Chelsea, Que., on Tuesday, Dec. 14, 2021. Bill 21 bans public sector workers who are considered to be in positions of authority, including teachers, from wearing religious symbols while working. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Justin Tang


Sakeina Syed
·Contributor
Fri, December 24, 2021

After a teacher in Chelsea, Quebec was told she had to be removed from her role for wearing a hijab, Canadians are expressing concern and outrage.

Fatemeh Anvari was told she had to move to a position outside the elementary school classroom she had been working in due to Bill 21, a Quebec secularism law that bars some civil servants from wearing religious symbols — like Anvari’s hijab.

Since her removal, there has been increased outcry from citizens and politicians. Hundreds gathered in protest on Tuesday in Chelsea, expressing support for Anvari. Meanwhile, Members of Parliament, Senators, and city councillors have been expressing their condemnation of the law.

While members of the Canadian Muslim community are frustrated by the news, they are less surprised.

It’s shocking that Canadians are looking at this incident and are surprised by it. This is exactly what we’ve been saying since Bill 21 had been passed. We’ve been saying what the drastic effects of it could be, and sadly now we’re seeing them.Fatema Abdalla, Communications Coordinator for the National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM)

“Throughout the nation, Muslims across Canada are frustrated and disturbed by this bill, and are wanting to do more and take more action,” she said.

The NCCM is calling for the federal government to intervene in the legal challenge against Bill 21. Abdalla says they have yet to hear of this intervention.

In a recent press conference, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said that despite his opposition to the law, the government would not be stepping in. Trudeau said that he wished to avoid a fight over jurisdiction between Ottawa and Quebec, and would leave the matter of making the case to “Quebeckers themselves.”

Liberal MP Salma Zahid released a statement this week saying it was time for the federal government to step in: “To date, the challenge has come from civil society. But as the party that brought the Charter of Rights and Freedoms to Canada, as a government that champions human rights around the world, we cannot allow the weight of this fight to be carried by civil society alone.”
What does the law mean for Muslims and other religious groups?

The law, known as Bill 21, is officially titled “An Act respecting the laicity of the State,” and it bars certain civil servants, including teachers, from wearing religious symbols in an effort to impose state secularism.

Abdalla said the NCCM has been fighting Bill 21 “since the day it was passed,” and has been engaged in an ongoing legal challenge of the bill since 2019. In collaboration with the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA), they have been challenging the constitutionality of the bill.

Alongside this, the groups were pushing for a temporary suspension of the law until it was reviewed by the courts. However, this request was denied, and the appeals process is ongoing.

Noa Mendelsohn Aviv, Director of the Equality program at the CCLA, spoke to Yahoo News Canada about the organization’s ongoing objection to the law.

“The harms that are happening are both to fundamental rights — the right to equality is being limited, the right to dignity, and of course to freedom of religion,” said Aviv. She added that the law violates “arguably a whole slew of other rights” on top of these: “People’s livelihoods and professions and career aspirations have been interfered with because of who they are and how they practice.”


Aviv said that when Bill 21 was “rushed through the National Assembly” in 2019, the CCLA filed their challenge within 24 hours.

“When we filed, it it was already clear to us that if people who wore religious symbols could not be hired into their professions or make a move within their professions, even those who were grandfathered in, that this was going to have a huge impact on Muslim women, and potentially also on some others, like religious Jewish men and women, Sikh men and women,” she said.

“Excluded and humiliated and degraded”

During the hearings late last year, Aviv says many people testified about the ways the law had already impacted their lives. These included financial impacts, jeopardized family stability, and emotional repercussions.

“One person talked about wanting to actually be a person who wears hijab — wanting to be her social, kind, caring self — and work with people who would understand that it could break down barriers. That people could see her and know her and understand.

Some of the moving testimony that was heard at the hearing was from women who talked about feeling like a second class citizen, about feeling excluded and humiliated and degraded.”

Masla Tahir is an activist in her final year of university, set to enter law school next year. She founded the organization My Hijab My Right as a response to laws restricting Muslim women’s clothing around the world, including in Belgium, France, and Canada.

Tahir told Yahoo News that hearing about Anvari’s removal from her position elicited a feeling of “helplessness.”

“Despite our activism work or our community engagement work, the bill is still in place. The power really lies within the federal government’s ability to intervene and make this stop, or it’s going to be dragged on in court,” she said.

Tahir said that while the ongoing legal challenges are occurring, it could take years: “In the meantime, it’s Muslim women who are going to be impacted negatively.” She cited the economic impacts that set the women, their families, and their livelihoods at a disadvantage.

She says that the recent events in Quebec, and the existence of the law, are particularly demoralizing in light of her own family’s perspective on coming to Canada.



My mom specifically chose Canada for us to move to because she wanted to raise her daughters in a country where there were equal rights for men and women, where women were given equal opportunity to flourish and follow their dreams.Masla Tahir, founder of My Hijab My Right

“Knowing that Bill 21 exists, and is stealing Muslim women’s dreams,” leaves her wordless.

Like Abdalla, Tahir is unsurprised that Bill 21 has impacted Anvari’s life and the lives of other Quebec women, an outcome she has been speaking out about. But seeing the concerns she’s been voicing be confirmed is no consolation.

“We knew that something like this would happen, but that doesn’t make it hurt any less.”

Analysis-Chile miners brace as president elect signals environmental crackdown


Gabriel Boric



Mon, December 20, 2021
By Fabian Cambero

SANTIAGO (Reuters) - Chile's mining sector is bracing for tighter environmental rules ahead after President-elect Gabriel Boric pledged to oppose a controversial $2.5 billion iron-copper mine that was approved in August after years of legal wrangling.

"To destroy the world is to destroy ourselves," Boric told a cheering crowd in his first speech after celebrating election victory on Sunday.

The 35-year-old leftist lawmaker singled out the planned Dominga mine, which critics say could devastate La Higuera, a coastal ecosystem rich in biodiversity with a large number of marine mammals and birds. The project's owner, privately held Andes Iron, has long rejected that assertion.

Boric, who takes office in March, campaigned on a pledge to overhaul Chile's market-oriented economic model, but details on his stance toward mining were thin. His comments on Sunday signaled that environmental regulation may be where he looks to make the biggest difference.

"We don't want more 'sacrifice zones' (areas of high pollution), we don't want projects that destroy our country, destroy communities and we exemplify a case that has been symbolic: No to Dominga," Boric said.

Shares of mining companies dropped sharply on Monday, including Chile-focused lithium miners Albemarle and SQM, amid a wider market retreat.

Prices for copper, Chile's major export, are at record highs, which has whetted the appetite of legislators around the region to push for a bigger share of profits to pay for economic recoveries after the coronavirus pandemic.

In neighboring Peru, the new leftist administration of President Pedro Castillo has given communities stronger backing in a spate of protests against mining firms, often over allegations they pollute local lands and water.

"If there is something that can have a real impact on the mining industry, in my opinion, we should start looking at the environmental issues," said Santiago-based Juan Carlos Guajardo, head of consultancy Plusmining.

Chile has the world's largest reserves of lithium, the ultra-light battery metal that is mined using brine from beneath pristine salt flats in the Atacama desert, where regulation around water use is already under scrutiny. Boric has criticized privatization in the sector and wants a state lithium firm.

The Andean nation is the world's top producer of copper and the No. 2 producer of lithium, a major ingredient of batteries used in electric vehicles. Both metals are seeing sharp price rises on soaring demand and a global rush to secure supply.

Chile is already debating higher taxes on mining firms - something Boric supports - as well as a stalled bill to protect glaciers in the mineral rich Andes. The industry says that measure, if unchanged, would risk current mines and obstruct new ones.

It could impact the Andina and El Teniente mines of state company Codelco, the world's largest copper producer, as well as Anglo American's Los Bronces, Los Pelambres of Antofagasta and Caserones, linked to JX Nippon Mining.

The National Mining Society (Sonami), representing companies in the sector, declined to comment on the president-elect's remarks on Sunday or about the outlook for Dominga.

"It is clear that the new wealth and environmental taxes are on the horizon, while the presidency will support plans to raise royalties on mining firms," said consulting Teneo in a report.

Boric, who has moderated his tone in recent weeks to win over centrist voters, did say environmental adjustments would have to be gradual.

"Not everything can be done at the same time and we will have to prioritize to make progress that allows us to improve, step by step, the lives of our people," he said.

(Reporting by Fabian Cambero; Editing by Adam Jourdan and David Gregorio)

Las Bambas says temporary truce in Peru road does not allow sustainable restart of mine


Peru's Andean rural residents complain of negative effects of mining activity

Thu, December 23, 2021, 

LIMA (Reuters) - MMG Ltd's Las Bambas copper mine said on Thursday that a temporary truce to lift a month-long blockade affecting a key copper transport road in Peru does not guarantee conditions to restart operations in a sustainable way.

Residents of the Chumbivilcas province had been blocking the road since Nov. 20, forcing Las Bambas, which produces some 2% of global copper output, to suspend production.

The situation has created a major issue for the government of leftist President Pedro Castillo. Peru is the world's No. 2 copper producer.

While many Chumbivilcas residents agreed to lift the blockade on Wednesday, Giselle Huamani, a top government official focused on social conflicts, told Reuters that the last community to unblock the road had communicated its decision only on Thursday.

In addition, communities have only agreed to lift the blockade temporarily until Dec. 30 https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/exclusive-peru-protesters-clear-las-bambas-road-after-mining-shutdown-legal-2021-12-22, when Peruvian Prime Minister Mirtha Vasquez is set to visit the area. Residents have said that depending on the agreements reached that day they will lift the blockade permanently or restart it.

Las Bambas said in a statement it "calls on all parties to respect the rule of law and generate the conditions necessary to restart our operations in a sustainable way." The company added that the temporary truce did not meet those conditions.

The Las Bambas mine has been a flashpoint for protests since the mine started operations, with blockades hitting the road on and off for over 400 days since then.

Vasquez has strongly urged protesting communities to clear the road but was vague about the consequences of not doing so. She has not ruled out a state of emergency declaration but said she would rather engage in dialogue.

(Reporting by Marcelo Rochabrun; Editing by Chris Reese, Diane Craft and Sonya Hepinstall)

A CALF BY ANY OTHER NAME....
Baby cow escapes NY slaughterhouse, finds sanctuary in Sussex County

William Westhoven, Morristown Daily Record
Thu, December 23, 2021

A Christmas break is keeping a young cow from becoming a Christmas steak.

A 400-pound Hereford heifer that escaped a slaughterhouse last week in Queens has found refuge at Skylands Animal Sanctuary and Rescue center in Sussex County.

New York Police said the cow, estimated to be nine months old, ran away from an area business last Friday and was corralled by rangers later that day in Flushing Meadows Corona Park.

"She will now be spending the holiday season at her new home, a local rescue sanctuary," the NYPD Special Ops Department wrote in a Tweet.

"Only in New York!" they added.

The New York City Parks Department also went to social media to praise its staff who "managed to rescue the cow through quick thinking and action."


Looks like our Urban Park Rangers were in a sentimental Moo-d today," they wrote.

The NYPD dispatched its ESU Truck 10 to assist at the scene.

The next day, Skylands posted that "Stacy" was in temporary quarantine at their 230-acre facility in Wantage.

"Little Stacy is doing well, getting used to us as she awaits test results that will hopefully give her the OK to go in with some other kids," they wrote.

During the quarantine period, "She gets human visitors and can see and hear other cows," they explained. "She just can’t get up close with them."

Young Hereford cow that escaped a Queens, N.Y. slaughterhouse finds a new home at Skylands Animal Sanctuary and Rescue Center in Wantage.

Once Stacy clears quarantine, she will join the approximately 450 other permanent residents at Skylands. The population there includes 93 other cows or bovine creatures, according to director Mike Stura.

The animals have permanent homes at the sanctuary after being rescued "from slaughterhouses, live markets, farms, extreme neglect, abuse, religious ceremonies, abandonment and are even found wandering streets."

"No matter where they are from or from what dire circumstances they escape, they are provided with proper veterinary care, the best foods, water, a safe place to live, eat and sleep as well as lots of love around the clock," Skylands states on its website. "Every animal requires room to run and live unencumbered by the threat of harm and each one gets exactly what they need here."

William Westhoven is a local reporter for DailyRecord.com. 

This article originally appeared on Morristown Daily Record: Slaughterhouse-bound cow finds refuge at Skylands Sanctuary in Wantage