Tuesday, March 15, 2022

University of Alberta initiative aims to protect Ukrainian archives, research
Stephen David Cook 
© David Bajer/CBC

 The Canadian Institute for Ukrainian Studies at the University of Alberta is part of an initiative to offer free, secure and confidential digital storage to academics and institutions in Ukraine.

Academics at the University of Alberta are aiming to help protect digital data in Ukraine under threat because of the war.

The Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies recently helped launch an initiative offering free, secure cloud storage to archivists, librarians, scientists and other institutions in Ukraine.

Director Natalia Khanenko-Friesen said the Ukraine Archives Rescue Team came as a result of brainstorming on how to assist colleagues in areas afflicted by the devastation of the Russian invasion.

"In particular, we're very concerned for our colleagues and for their work, which they have been pursuing in the south of Ukraine in the eastern part of Ukraine, where we have seen the advancement of the Russian military the most."

Khanenko-Friesen said she's heard reports of archives and museums being destroyed or vandalized.

The digital storage is available to scholars and institutions of all disciplines, although Khanenko-Friesen said there is an important cultural dimension to the initiative.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, in the lead up to the invasion, presented a false narrative that Ukraine was not a true nation but an artificial creation carved from Russia by its enemies.

"We are indeed pursuing this initiative out of the fear that we may have not just the collections lost, but we may see the extermination of cultural legacy and cultural heritage," Khanenko-Friesen said.

The working group includes the CIUS and the Kulov Folklore Center at the U of A as well as other Canadian research institutions.

The institute is responding to the crisis in other ways, including a "Did You Know" information series aimed at answering basic questions about the conflict.

Khanenko-Friesen said it is also planning to launch a media monitoring and analysis initiative to combat disinformation.

Past lessons

Frank Sysyn is a professor of history and the director of the CIUS' Toronto office. He said the work of digitizing and sharing data is crucial for future scholarship.

"We all think of Sarajevo, of the destruction of the wonderful library in Bosnia, and of the need later to try and recreate that library with anyone's notes that were left."

Sysyn began his academic career in the 1970s, when the Soviet Union limited access to its archives. The emergence of more open post-Soviet states offered academics the chance to delve into information previously unavailable to them.

He said the Russian Federation and Ukraine have in the decades since diverged in their level of access. Ukraine's "virtually totally open" archives are important not only for better studying the country but the wider region.

"This has been extremely important for developing the field of history, culture in new ways," he said, adding that those who would previously have gone to Russian cities to study materials from the Soviet Union, including secret police files, now visit Ukraine or Baltic states.

Sysyn fears that if these archives fall under the control of Putin's regime, important documents could once again be inaccessible or even destroyed.

"We've got to look ahead and make sure that this will be preserved, whatever happens."

Russia's military forces kept up their punishing campaign to capture the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv on Monday after an airstrike on a military base near the Polish border brought the war dangerously close to NATO's doorstep.

A new round of talks between Russian and Ukrainian officials raised hopes that progress would be made in evacuating civilians and getting emergency supplies to besieged areas.

The talks were later put on hold Monday and were expected to resume Tuesday.
Verbatim: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's address to Canada's Parliament

OTTAWA — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy delivered an address to Canadian parliamentarians in the House of Commons on Tuesday, where he appeared through a video link.

© Provided by The Canadian Press

Here is a full transcript of his speech, as translated into English from the original Ukrainian by a parliamentary interpreter:

"Ladies and gentlemen, Mr. Speaker, Prime Minister — dear Justin — members of the government, members of Parliament, all distinguished guests, friends, before I begin, I would like you to understand my feelings and the feelings of all Ukrainians, as far as it is possible, our feelings over the last 20 days — 20 days of the full-scale aggression (by the) Russian Federation after eight years of fighting in Donbass region.

"Can you only imagine? Imagine that at 4 a.m., each of you, you start hearing bomb explosions, severe explosions. Justin, can you imagine hearing — you, your children — hearing all these severe explosions? Bombing (the) airport, bombing the Ottawa airport, tens of other cities in your wonderful country? Can you imagine that?

"Cruise missiles are falling down on your territory and your children are asking you what is happening. You are receiving the first news (as to) which infrastructure objects have been bombed and destroyed by the Russian Federation and you know how many people already died. Can you only imagine? What words? How can you explain to your children that a full-scale aggression just happened in your country? You know that this is a war to annihilate your state, your country. You know that this is the war to subjugate your people.

"And on the second day you receive notifications that huge columns of military equipment are entering your country, crossing the border. They are entering small cities. They are (laying) siege, encircling cities and they start to shell civilian neighbourhoods. They bomb school buildings. They destroyed kindergarten facilities, like in our city, in the city of Sumy, like in the city of Okhtyrka. Imagine that someone is laying siege to Vancouver. Can you just imagine that for a second and all these people who are left in such a city? And this is exactly the situation that our city of Mariupol is suffering right now. They are left without heat or hydro, or without a means of communicating, almost without food, without water, seeking shelter in bomb shelters.

"Dear Justin, dear guests, can you imagine that every day you receive memorandums about the number of casualties, including women and children? You have heard about the bombings. Currently, we have 97 children that died during this war. Can you imagine if the famous CN Tower in Toronto was hit by Russian bombs?

"Of course, I don’t wish this on anyone, but this is our reality in which we live. We have to contemplate, we have to see where the next bombing takes place. In your church's square? We have a Freedom Square in the city of Kharkiv, our Babi Yar, the place where victims of the Holocaust were buried, and it has been bombed by the Russians.

"Imagine that Canadian facilities have been bombed similarly as our buildings and memorial places are being bombed. A number of families have died. Every night is a horrible night. The Russians are shelling from all kinds of artillery, from tanks. They are hitting civilian infrastructure. They hit big buildings.

"Can you imagine that there is a fire starting at a nuclear power plant and that is exactly what happened in our country. Each city that they are marching through, they are taking down the Ukrainian flags. Can you imagine someone taking down your Canadian flags in Montreal and other Canadian cities? I know that you all support Ukraine. We’ve been friends with you, Justin, but also I would like you to understand and I would like you to feel this, what we feel every day. We want to live and we want to be victorious. We want to prevail for the sake of life.

"Can you imagine when you call your friends, your friendly nations, and you ask ‘Please close the sky. Please close the airspace. Please stop the bombing? How many more cruise missiles have to fall on our cities until you make this happen?' And they, in return, express their deep concerns about the situation. When we talk with our partners they say ‘Please hold on. Hold on a little longer.’

"Some people are talking about trying to avoid escalation and at the same time in response to our aspiration to become members of NATO, we also do not hear a clear answer. Sometimes we don’t see obvious things. It is dire straits, but it also allowed us to see who our real friends are over the last 20 days and as well in the eight previous years.

"I am sure that you’ve been able to see clearly what is going on and I am addressing all of you. Canada has always been steadfast in their support. You have been a reliable partner to Ukraine and Ukrainians and I am sure this will continue. You have offered your help, your assistance, at our earliest request. You supply us with the military assistance, with humanitarian assistance. You imposed severe sanctions. At the same time, we see that unfortunately they did not bring the end to the war. You can see that our cities like Kharkiv, Mariupol and many other cities are not protected just like your cities are protected — Edmonton, Vancouver. You can see that Kyiv is being shelled and bombed.

"It used to be a very peaceful country, peaceful cities, but now they are being constantly bombarded. Basically, what I am trying to say is that you all need to do more to stop Russia, to protect Ukraine, and by doing that to protect Europe from Russian threats. They are destroying everything: memorial complexes, schools, hospitals, housing complexes. They already killed 97 Ukrainian children.

"We are not asking for much. We are asking for justice, for real support, which will help us to prevail to defend, to save lives, to save life all over the world. Canada is leading in these efforts and I am hoping that other countries will follow the same suit. We are asking for more of your leadership and please take a greater part in these efforts, Justin, and all of our friends of Ukraine. Old friends owe the truth. Please understand how important it is for us to close our airspace from Russian missiles and Russian aircraft. I hope you can understand. I hope you can increase your efforts, that you can increase sanctions so they will not have a single dollar to fund their war effort. Commercial entities should not be working in Russia.

"Probably you know better than many in any other countries that this attack on Ukraine is their attempt to annihilate the Ukrainian people, and there nothing else to it. This is their main objective. It’s actually a war against Ukrainian people, and it’s an attempt to destroy everything that we, as Ukrainians, do. It’s an attempt to destroy our future, to destroy our nation, our character.

"You Canadians, you know all this very well, and that is why I am asking you, please, do not stop your efforts. Please expand your efforts to bring back peace in our peaceful country. I believe and I know that you can do it. We are part of the antiwar coalition and, jointly, I am sure that it will achieve results.

"I would like to also ask our Ukrainian diaspora in Canada: This is a historical moment, and we need your support, your practical support. We hope that with your practical steps, you will show that you are more than part of Ukrainian history. Please remember, this is a practical, modern-day history of Ukraine. We want to live. We want to have peace.

"I am grateful to every one of you in the Parliament of Canada who is present there and to every Canadian citizen. I am very grateful to you, Justin. I am grateful to the Canadian people, and I am confident that, together, we will overcome and we will be victorious.

"Glory to Ukraine. Thank you to Canada."

This report by The Canadian Press was first published March 15, 2022.

The Canadian Press
 

 As Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy spoke to Parliament Tuesday morning, the National Post convened an expert panel to consider his words and his delivery: Dominique Arel, professor and chair of Ukrainian Studies at the University of Ottawa; Robert Danisch, professor in communication arts at the University of Waterloo who studies political rhetoric in democratic societies; Natalia Khanenko-Friesen, professor and chair of the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies at the University of Alberta; and Ronald Beiner, professor emeritus of political science at the University of Toronto and author of Dangerous Minds: Nietzsche, Heidegger, and the Return of the Far Right. Zelenskyy’s words here were delivered in Ukrainian and are presented in English according to the Parliamentary translation.

ZELENSKYY: Before I begin, I would like you to understand my feelings, and the feelings of all Ukrainians as far as it is possible. Our feelings over the last 20 days, 20 days of full-scale aggression of Russian Federation after eight years of fighting in Donbas region. Can you only imagine? Imagine at 4 a.m., each of you, you start hearing bomb explosions, severe explosions. Justin, can you imagine hearing? You, your children hear all these severe explosions, bombing of airport, bombing of Ottawa Airport. Tens of other cities of your wonderful country. Can you imagine that?

DANISCH: In terms of a communication structure, he’s doing the classic, what we call in rhetoric, identification. He wants us to identify with Ukraine and share their emotional position. It’s a classic speechmaking strategy that’s been around for 2,000 years. It invites the audience to make an imaginative leap, and one function is to put the audience in the right frame of mind in order to persuade them.

AREL: He’s very good at that. He relates the human story. He was an actor before, but he’s not acting now, that’s why he’s so effective. He has the ability to speak from the heart and to the heart. Of course we can’t imagine that, but how could Ukrainians imagine that themselves just three or four weeks ago? The last time any city in Ukraine was bombed was 1944.

ZELENSKYY: Cruise missiles are falling down on your territory and your children are asking you what happened. And you are receiving the first news, which infrastructure objects have been bombed and destroyed by Russian Federation, and you know how many people already died. Can you only imagine what words, how you can explain to your children that full-scale aggression just happened in your country. You know that this is war to annihilate your state, your country. You know that this is the war to subjugate your people. And on the second day you receive notifications that huge columns of military equipment are entering your country, crossing the border. They’re entering small cities, they’re giving siege, they’re encircling cities and they start to shell civil neighbourhoods. They bomb school buildings. They destroyed kindergarten facilities. Like in our cities of Sumy, like in city of Okhtyrka. Imagine that someone is laying siege to Vancouver? Can you just imagine for a second, and all these people who are left in such cities. This is exactly the situation that our city of Mariupol is suffering right now, and they are left without heat or electricity or without means of communicating, almost without food, without water, seeking shelter in bomb shelters. Dear Justin, dear guests, can you imagine that every day you receive memorandums about the number of casualties, including women and children. You’ve heard about the bombings. Currently we have 97 children that died during this war. Can you imagine the famous CN Tower in Toronto, if it was hit by Russian bombs?

DANISCH: Zelenskyy’s speech to the British Parliament echoed and rephrased familiar lines from Churchill and Hamlet. It is saying he is kin with his fellow British world citizens. He didn’t do that with us. He did not quote literature. It’s funny, but it would have been more powerful in a certain way. He was generic in his reference to the CN Tower.

ZELENSKYY: Of course, I don’t wish this on anyone, but this is our reality in which we live. We have to contemplate, we have to see where the next bombing will take place. We have a Freedom Square in the city of Kharkiv. Our Babyn Yar, the place where victims of Holocaust were buried, it has been bombed by the Russians. Imagine that Canadian facilities have been bombed similarly as our buildings and memorial places are being bombed. A number of families have died. Every night is a horrible night. Russians are shelling from all kinds of artillery, from tanks. They’re hitting civilian infrastructure, they’re hitting buildings. Can you imagine that there is fire starting at a nuclear power plant, and that’s exactly what happened in our country. Each city that they are marching through, they’re taking down Ukrainian flags. Can you imagine someone taking down your Canadian flags in Montreal or other Canadian cities. I know that you will support Ukraine. We’ve been friends with you Justin, but also I would like you to understand, and I would like you to feel this, what we feel everyday.

DANISCH: I’m worried that there’s a bit of Instagrammable fame to this moment for him. He’s media savvy. It helps him gain attention, but often on Instagram and TikTok, they’re quick burns. You get a lot of attention quickly, and then it dissipates. If he wants us to not forget about him, he has to amplify the stakes, and I’m not seeing it that way. I’m seeing the Instagrammable qualities.

ZELENSKYY: We want to live and we want to be victorious. We want to prevail for the sake of life. Can you imagine when you call your friends, your friendly nation, and you ask, “Please close the sky, close the airspace, please stop the bombing, how many more cruise missiles have to fall on our cities until you make this happen?” And in return they express their deep concern about the situation. When we talk with our partners, they say please hold on hold on a little longer. Some people are talking about trying to avoid escalation, at the same time in response to our aspiration to become members of NATO, we also do not hear a clear answer.

BEINER: It’s not clear that a speech, however powerful, will induce NATO to get more enmeshed in this conflict than it already is. But one hopes that at least a way can be found to put the Polish MiGs at the disposal of Ukrainian pilots, so Ukraine can do the work itself of closing Ukrainian airspace to Russian attacks. This is not something that Canada can do, but perhaps it can at least urge the U.S. to find a solution.

ZELENSKYY: Sometimes we don’t see obvious things. It’s dire straits, but it also allowed us to see who our real friends are over the last 20 days, and as well eight previous years.

BEINER: What does full friendship require in this situation? More than Ukraine is currently getting from Canada and other allies. Sanctions have not stopped the war, nor will they stop innocent Ukrainians from dying.

ZELENSKYY: I am sure that you’ve been able to see clearly what’s going on, and I’m addressing all of you. Canada has always been steadfast in their support. You’ve been a reliable partner to Ukraine and Ukrainians, and I’m sure this will continue. You’ve offered your help, you assistance at our earliest request. You supply us with military assistance, with humanitarian assistance, you imposed severe sanctions, serious sanctions. At the same time we see that unfortunately this did not bring the end to the war. You can see that our cities like Kharkiv, like Mariupol, are not protected just like your cities are protected, Edmonton, Vancouver. You can see that Kyiv is being shelled and bombed. It used to be we were a very peaceful country, peaceful cities, but not they’re being constantly bombarded. Basically what I’m trying to say that we all need to do, you all need to do more to stop Russia, to protect Ukraine, and by doing that to protect Europe from Russian threat. They are destroying everything. Memorial complexes, schools, hospitals, housing complex. They already killed 97 Ukrainian children. We are not asking too much. We are asking for justice, for real support which will help us to prevail, to defend, to save life all of the world.

DANISCH: He was trying to be gently critical because he wants more from us. The identification was meant to soften that criticism, make us more receptive to the criticism. I got the sense that he was exhausted by that labour of gently critiquing governments. He knows he has to perform the identification first so the criticism doesn’t push us away, but the strategy is not working. He is not getting the no-fly zone. The criticism may have to be stronger to get us to listen.

ZELENSKYY: Canada is leading in these efforts, and I am hoping that other countries will follow suit. We are asking for more of your leadership, and please take more, greater part in these efforts, Justin and all of our friends of Ukraine, all friends of the truth. Please understand how important it is for us to close our airspace from Russian missiles and Russian aircraft. I hope you can understand.

BEINER: Alas, he’s asking for something that Canada and other NATO members won’t dare do, as Zelenskyy knows.

AREL: Just a month ago, the position of Canada was that we would not send lethal weapons. Why? For fear to escalate. And then of course now we’re sending massive amounts of weapons. What is unimaginable now may not be unimaginable a month from now, so Zelenskyy will keep asking.

ZELENSKYY: I hope you can increase your efforts, you can increase sanctions so they do not have a single dollar to fund their war effort. Commercial entities should not be working in Russia. Probably you know better than many other countries that this attack on Ukraine it’s their attempt to annihilate Ukrainian people, and there’s nothing else to it. This is their main objective. It’s actually the war against Ukrainian people, and it’s an attempt to destroy everything that we as Ukrainians do. It’s an attempt to destroy our future, to destroy our nation, our character. You, Canadians, you know very well all this. That’s why I’m asking you please do not stop in your efforts. Please expand your efforts to bring back peace in our peaceful country. I believe, and I know that you can do it. We are part of the anti-war coalition, and jointly I’m sure that will achieve results. I would like to also ask our Ukrainian diaspora in Canada. This is a historical moment and we need your support, your practical support. We hope that with your practical steps you will show that you are part of more than Ukrainian history. Please remember, this is a practical modern day history of Ukraine. We want to live, we want to have peace. I am grateful to everyone of you in the Parliament of Canada who is present there, to every Canadian citizen. I am very grateful to you, Justin. I am grateful to Canadian people, and I am confident that together we will overcome and will be victorious. Glory to Ukraine. Thank you to Canada.

DANISCH: I thought what was more notable was what he didn’t do. He did not tell us why democracy matters, or why it’s good. He opted out of that, which to me was kind of a mistake. He didn’t paint it as a conflict between democracy and fascism, and that was a miss.

AREL: The war’s goal is to overthrow government. It is eminently anti-democratic. Russia has been good at confusing the narrative internationally. Domestically they extinguish free media. Propaganda is built on denying the reality of the war that they won’t call a war. When Zelenskyy is saluting “friends of truth,” I think he’s getting at that. This is the real truth. we’re fighting for freedom, for statehood, and what we say is real.



ANOTHER INTERNECINE LEADERSHIP RACE
Poilievre pitches to new immigrants, as Brown attacks him over 2015 niqab ban bill

OTTAWA — Brampton Mayor Patrick Brown and high-profile Conservative Pierre Poilievre spent Monday battling over a seven-year-old election promise to prohibit face coverings during citizenship ceremonies — a sign of what could be the makings of a tense rivalry between candidates in the Tory leadership race.

© Provided by The Canadian Press

Brown, who launched his bid on Sunday, blasted longtime Ottawa-area MP Poilievre over his actions back in 2015 when the party promised to create a "barbaric cultural practices" tip line and require people's faces to be visible during citizenship oaths.

The attack came as Poilievre spent the past few days meeting with cultural community leaders in the Greater Toronto Area and promising to cut red tape for immigrants wanting to access the necessary licences they need to work in regulated industries. Among those he met with were members of the Armenian, Muslim and Pakistani communities as well some of the party's candidates from the area.

Regardless of who is chosen as leader Sept. 10, Conservatives know they must make inroads with immigrants and racialized Canadians if theyhope to pick up seats in the region as well as other major cities and suburbs, considered key to defeating three-term Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Poilievre pledged Monday to revive similar programs that were in place under the last Conservative leader who did well in communities of visible minorities: former prime minister Stephen Harper, at least prior to 2015.

He promised toincentivize provinces to require occupational licensing bodies to decide on an immigrant's application within 60 days of receiving their paperwork, rather than forcing them to wait for months.

As well, Poilievre pitched offering small loans to immigrants who might need to take extra courses to gain a professional or trade licence to work in their respective field.

As Poilievre made these pledges, Brown, who is positioning himself as the candidate who stands for religious freedoms, released a statement saying the MP lacks credibility on any policy that impacts minority communities given his role in the Conservatives' 2015 election campaign.

It was during that race when the party, then led by Harper, promised to create a tip line for so-called "barbaric cultural practices." Conservatives at the time said it was meant to report things like forced marriage.

During that election, Poilievre was running for re-election as a candidate. He was also a member of Harper's government when it introduced a bill banning people from wearing face coverings during citizenship ceremonies. That was ultimately struck down in court. The promise was also included in the party's election campaign, when Harper also mused about possibly extending it to federal public servants.

Brown said Monday that Poilievre has never spoken out against these measures. The MP also has Jenni Byrne on his team, who was the party's national campaign manager in 2015.

"This is the same campaign which platformed those two abhorrent policies, and lost the Conservatives the 2015 general election," Brown's statement read.

"Even if he attempts to distance himself from his silence today, it would be a hollow gesture in an insincere bid to gain votes."

Poilievre responded Monday by calling Brown a "liar," accusing him of mischaracterizing what Harper was doing.

"There was no niqab ban," he said in a statement released on social media.

"I would never support that, nor did Mr. Harper. What Mr. Harper proposed was that a person's face be visible while giving oaths at citizenship ceremonies."

Poilievre, whose statement didn't address the past proposal of a "barbaric cultural practices" tip line, added he would continue to support immigration and equality.

In response, National Council of Canadians CEO Mustafa Farooq tweeted that "leadership requires accountability" and pointed out some of Poilievre's fellow MPs have apologized for what happened in 2015.

Among those is Edmonton MP Tim Uppal, a co-chair on Poilievre's campaign, who has apologized for his role as a minister in promoting the ban on niqabs during citizenship ceremonies.Before the leadership race, Uppal said the party was still dealing with the fallout from racialized communities because of the 2015 campaign.

A post-mortem from the Conservatives' 2021 election loss submitted in January came to a similar finding, according to three sources who spoke to The Canadian Press on the condition of anonymity.


Melissa Lantsman, a newly elected Ontario MP who is also supporting Poilievre in the race, shared on social media last fall that while she was stood in favour of banning the niqab during citizenship ceremonies in 2015, her "view has since evolved."

Michael Diamond, a campaign strategist who, among other campaigns, worked on Peter MacKay's 2020 Conservative leadership bid, said Brown's attack over the issue and targeting of Byrne is a "proxy" attack on Harper, who is highly respected among the membership.

"It seems like folly to me to attack the last campaign of the man who remains the most popular figure in this party."

He added it's still early days in the race and cautioned that the debates playing out between the campaigns and on social media were occurring in an "echo chamber."

This report by The Canadian Press was first published March 14, 2022.

Stephanie Taylor, The Canadian Press
Kai Cheng Thom: Canada's sex work laws are harming the people they were designed to protect. It's time to decriminalize prostitution

Special to National Post

The federal government is currently reviewing the laws governing one of society’s most controversial issues — sex work. It is time for Canada to decriminalize sex work between consenting adults.

In 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada struck down provisions in the Criminal Code that criminalized sex work, only for those laws to be replaced shortly thereafter by the Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act (PCEPA), which essentially does the same thing. PCEPA purports to protect vulnerable individuals, but instead unfairly punishes consenting adults for trying to make a living.

It is important to note that sex work, the commercial trade of sexual services for money or barter between adults, is categorically distinct from human trafficking, which is the commercial trade of human beings of all ages and genders for exploitative purposes.

Human trafficking can involve forced sexual labour, but also occurs in many other contexts, such as sweatshops, the illegal sale of infants to adoptive parents and organ harvesting. Alarmists across the political spectrum often conflate sex work with human trafficking, but the difference is stark. It is the difference between enslavement or indentured servitude and paid employment.

Here we come to the crux of the issue: slavery and indentured servitude, it goes without saying, are abominable and must be wiped out. Seeking to make a living by willingly selling services — however intimate, provided that both seller and buyer are adults with the full capacity for consent — many would argue, is a human right.

As a former social worker and longtime activist for human rights, I have had the privilege of meeting many sex workers, all of whom were resilient and resourceful individuals seeking to make the best of their economic circumstances, as all of us do.

Some were also brilliant businesspeople, primarily women and LGBT people from disadvantaged socioeconomic backgrounds who used their bodies and brains to achieve a middle class standard of living — an opportunity that might have otherwise been denied to them. Many are raising and supporting families.

PCEPA is based on the so-called “Nordic model” adopted by some European countries, which claims to protect sex workers while punishing their clients by allowing for the independent sale of sexual services by an adult, while criminalizing the purchase of those services. Also criminalized are third parties who might facilitate the sale of sexual services, such as advertising platforms and escort agency agencies.

The idea that this protects sex workers is nonsense. Imagine trying to run a plumbing or hairdressing business in a country where everyone trying to hire a plumber or get a haircut was committing a criminal offence.

People would still get their toilets fixed and bangs trimmed, but it would be vastly more difficult for those who ply such trades to make a living. It would also make it more difficult for them to form honest business relationships and receive the same legal protections as everyone else takes for granted.

PCEPA has driven sex work into the shadows, endangering the very communities it claims to serve. Not only does it place sex workers in serious financial precarity, it makes it hard for them to change careers and prevents them from working together to improve their safety, since law enforcement may interpret this as selling another person’s sexual services. PCEPA also makes screening out potentially abusive clients far more challenging, because it makes them more reticent to provide identifying information.

It should go without saying that the law should prioritize the protection of children and vulnerable individuals. But women and children are forced to sew clothing for terrible wages all over the world. That does not mean that the garment industry should be criminalized. Instead, we should work to ensure that everyone’s human rights are protected.

We all deserve the right to make a living in the way we see fit, so long as our work doesn’t harm others. Sex workers are no exception.

National Post

Kai Cheng Thom is a writer and consultant based in Toronto. She holds a master’s degree in social work and a master’s degree in couple and family therapy from McGill University.














  • Sex Work is Work - Working-Class Voices: First Person ...

    https://newlaborforum.cuny.edu/2019/02/26/sex-work-is-work

    Sex work was a term politicized in the 1970s by Carol Leigh who wanted to join all sex workers together by the nature of our work. There is a lot of stratification that happens around sex workers, degrading one another based on perceived differences in the work; it’s frequently called “whoreaphobia” within the industry.

  • Sex workers can tell you why sex work is work – speak to ...

    https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/beyond-trafficking-and-slavery/sex...

    Sex work as worksex workers’ rights as workers’ rights. GAATW’s support for the sex worker rights movement stems from our conviction that women are …

  • Sex Work is Real Work, and it's Time to Treat it That Way

    https://www.aclu.org/news/lgbtq-rights/sex-work-is-real-work-and-its...

    Sex Work is Real Work, and it's Time to Treat it That Way Sex workers aren’t always a part of the conversation about police brutality, but they should be. Police regularly target, harass, and assault sex workers or people they think are sex workers, such as trans women of color.

  • Sex work is work. That’s the problem… and the key | Eurozine

    https://www.eurozine.com/sex-work-work-thats-problem-key

    ‘Sex work’ is the term chosen by sex workers to refer to the labour they perform, with the clear intention to emphasise that it is ‘work’ and to avoid the moral judgments associated with the term ‘prostitution’. Sex work can be considered part of the service industry, which is often undervalued, unwaged and feminized.

  • Why Sex Work Is Real Work - Teen Vogue

    https://www.teenvogue.com/story/why-sex-work-is-real-work

    Sex work is legal in Amsterdam, but it isn’t in many other places, though some people are working to make it so. In South Africa, where I am based, for instance, sex 



  • CRIMINAL HIP CAPITALI$M
    Canopy Growth fined nearly $500K by CRA for allegedly growing cannabis before licence
    Christopher Nardi 

    OTTAWA – Canadian cannabis company Canopy Growth was fined nearly half-a-million dollars in 2020 by the Canada Revenue Agency because it began growing plants on an outdoor farm before receiving its licence from the agency, National Post has learned.
    © Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press/File A worker at Canopy Growth's Tweed facility in Smiths Falls, Ontario.

    Now, the Ontario-based company is appealing the $434,611 fine to the federal court, arguing that it had complied with all its obligations required by both Health Canada and the CRA contrary to the latter’s claims.

    But one cannabis law expert says it will be an uphill battle for Canopy Growth because there are a number of “challenges” with their arguments against the tax agency.

    “If I had to pick which side of the argument to argue on, I would be wanting to be on the federal government side of this one,” said Trina Fraser, partner at Brazeau Seller law firm in Ottawa.

    In court documents consulted by National Post, the company says the penalty is tied to its “Outdoor Farm” project launched in the summer of 2019.

    Under “significant pressure” to produce enough cannabis after legalization in late 2018, the company set up a corporate subsidiary in early 2019 that applied for a cultivation licence from Health Canada for an outdoor farm, according to the appeal.

    Health Canada eventually gave them their licence in June, “which was well into the 2019 outdoor growing season.”
    Canopy Growth execs make millions in bonuses despite $1.7 billion loss
    Pot partnership between Canopy Growth and Drake falls apart

    The company then applied for a separate cannabis licence from the CRA, which is mandatory under the Excise Act. Court documents say it received the licence roughly one month later.

    But just over one year later, CRA sent Canopy Growth a letter informing them they were being fined $434,611 because it found the company had begun cultivating cannabis before it received its licence from the agency.

    “The receipt and cultivation of vegetative cannabis plants prior to obtaining a cannabis licence under the (Excise Act) is a contravention of the (Excise Act),” reads an excerpt of a letter sent by CRA and quoted in court documents.

    The amount of the fine was based on two-thirds of CRA’s estimated market value of the 2019 crop, the company said, meaning the total value was likely around $650,000.

    “In reality, the fair market value of the 2019 Crop was nil, as evidenced by the fact that the crop was destroyed, and no viable cannabis product was ever produced from the crop,” the company argued in its appeal.

    The company also argued that it never contravened the law because it had received its Health Canada cannabis licence and believed that nothing in the Excise Act prevented it from beginning cultivation while waiting for the CRA licence.

    “The CRA Letter contained no conditions, limitations, or restrictions, with respect to the production of cannabis products,” the company argued.

    “The Alleged Offence that the (CRA) has accused (the company) of committing is not an offence under the EA,” the documents read.

    In the appeal, Canopy Growth also said that sections of the Excise Act only state that a “cannabis licence” is required for legal cultivation, which they argue is referring to the one emitted by Health Canada under the Cannabis Act, and not the one by CRA under the Excise Act.

    “They’re going to have a hard time establishing that, when you see the phrase ‘cannabis licence’ in that section (of the Excise Act), that it could possibly mean a cannabis licence issued by Health Canada,” Fraser said. “I think it’s clear, but it’s up to the court to decide.”

    In its appeal, Canopy Growth is asking the Federal Court to either cancel the fine and order the agency to reimburse the money, or diminish the value of the fine if the court considers that the company did commit an illegal act.

    Both the CRA and Canopy Growth declined to comment on the case because it is in front of the Court. A company spokesperson confirmed that it had paid the fine in full in 2019 “to avoid further financial penalties associated with late payment.”

    Last year, Marijuana Business Daily revealed that CRA had levied 22 cannabis-related fines worth a total of $1.3 million in 2019 and 2020, though the agency refused to name the companies penalized.

    According to their data, Canopy Growth’s $434,611 fine was by far the most significant in 2020, though the largest one dolled out by the agency at that point was worth $507,660 in 2019 to an unnamed firm.

    Marijuana Business Daily also reported last February that Canopy Growth reported a $115 million net loss in the last quarter of 2021 as cannabis sales continue to fall in Canada.

    Fraser said the CRA has even asked her to remind her cannabis company clients that they need to receive their licence under the Excise Act before beginning cultivation.

    “CRA reached out to me at one point and said….‘We are seeing lots of situations where new licence holders are commencing production before they get their CRA cannabis licence. That is a problem. We will not hesitate we take that very seriously,’” she said.
    CP NOT BARGAINING  WAITING  FOR BACK TO WORK LAW

    Farm groups, manufacturers nervous as date approaches for potential strike at CP Rail


    CALGARY — Customers of Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd. are growing increasingly concerned about a labour dispute that the union has said could result in a potential rail strike as early as this week.

    © Provided by The Canadian Press

    Earlier this month, the Teamsters Canada Rail Conference reported the results of a strike vote by Canadian Pacific employees.

    According to the union, more than 96 per cent of members voted in favour of a work stoppage at the Calgary-based railway. While neither CP nor the Teamsters provided an update on the status of talks Monday, the union had previously indicated a strike could begin immediately after midnight on March 16.


    The union has said wages, benefits and pensions are the main issues behind the potential job action.

    But shippers who rely on rail transport say a strike, if it happens, would come at a time when many industries are already dealing with supply chain disruptions and related fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Dennis Darby, president of the trade association Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters, said a recent survey of industry members showed 90 per cent have experienced problems with the supply chain over the last 12 months.

    He said Canadian manufacturers have already lost out on an estimated $10.5 billion in sales because of transportation network disruptions and simply cannot afford another interruption.

    "This latest potential disruption is just the latest example of the headwinds the sector has faced," Darby said. "We just don't need another reason for delays."

    Fertilizer Canada — which represents manufacturers, wholesale and retail distributors of fertilizers — warned that a rail strike could result in fertilizer production facilities being forced to shut-in production, a situation that would be "crippling" during farmers' crucial spring seeding season.

    "The agriculture sector is already experiencing supply challenges compounded by the war in Ukraine and cannot withstand any more disruption to the supply chain," said Fertilizer Canada president and chief executive Karen Proud in a news release.

    Seventy-five per cent of the fertilizer used by Canadian farmers is shipped by rail, Proud added, and there is no other transportation method that currently has capacity or can be brought online in time to mitigate the impact of a strike.

    Cattle producers also warned of the potential devastating impacts of a CP Rail work stoppage. Last summer's extreme drought has resulted in a widespread shortage of cattle feed in Western Canada, and many producers have been relying on CP Rail for shipments of corn from the U.S. to feed their animals.

    "The majority of our members have said they have just one, maybe two weeks of grain left in the bin," said Janice Tranberg, president and chief executive of the Alberta Cattle Feeders Association.

    "We don't think there is a lot of alternative grain available if we can't get that U.S. corn, so this is quite disturbing."

    This report by The Canadian Press was first published March 14, 2022.

    Companies in this story: (TSX:CP)

    Amanda Stephenson, The Canadian Press
    ANTI MASK ANTI VAX PROTESTERS ARE UCP BASE 

    Calgary police chief says officers in no-win situation at weekend protest clash

    Calgary's police chief says officers were in a no-win situation when anti-vaccine, anti-mask protesters got into a "standoff situation" with residents and other counter-protesters on the weekend.
    © Provided by The Canadian Press

    Mark Neufeld held a news conference Monday to respond to concerns from the mayor, city councillors and residents that police have allowed the weekly protest to grow by not enforcing the law.

    "It's a very complicated issue and it's not just a Calgary issue," Neufeld told reporters. "We've actually seen these protests in other cities in our province, in other provinces, in our country and even internationally."

    Neufeld said rather than blame police, people should be working together to come up with some solutions.

    Calgary Mayor Jyoti Gondek said on social media Saturday that the disruption was a parade rather than a protest, yet had no permits or licences. She said it's time to face the fact that the protests require more than crowd control.


    People living in and around the Beltline, an area just south of the city's downtown, said the protests have been taking place every weekend since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    "It really kicked up a notch with the Ottawa convoy," said Peter Oliver, president of the Beltline Neighbourhoods Association.

    Billed as the Freedom Convoy, the demonstration in Ottawa began Jan. 28 as transport trucks and thousands of people converged on Parliament Hill and took over downtown Ottawa for about three weeks. It prompted Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to invoke the federal Emergencies Act. Arrests began Feb. 17, and by the end of the following day, police had charged more than 100 people with various offences.

    Oliver said the Calgary protests relocated to Central Memorial Park, which is in the Beltline across from a health centre, and have ballooned to thousands of people every Saturday. They include food and merchandise tables and a "real toxic mix" of people, he said.

    Oliver said residents were willing to put up with the disruption for awhile, but they've had enough with the hateful messages and honking horns.

    Some residents, he said, tried to take back their community Saturday by blocking the route into the community by the protesters.

    Neufeld said officers had the difficult task of managing the two separate but related protests.


    He said the "freedom" protesters refused — for the first time — to follow police directions, which led to the two groups coming together in what was seen as a public safety issue.


    Police were seen in videos physically moving some of the residents and counter-protesters using police service bikes.

    "This was a damned if you do and damned if you don't, no-win for the police," said Neufeld.

    "When you get two groups coming together like this who seem to be pitted on having conflict, there is going to be no win."

    The Calgary Police Commission, which provides independent civilian oversight and governance of the police, said in a statement it understands the frustrations of downtown and Beltline residents and businesses who have dealt with the protests for the past two years.

    "We have been in discussions with the Calgary Police Service and city council to try find a solution that respects people's Charter rights to protest and peacefully assemble, while also stopping the disproportionate impact these protests are having on communities in our city's core," it reads.

    "This past weekend's events show a clear escalation in the situation that needs to be addressed, and everyone involved will continue working together this week to find a better path forward."

    This report by The Canadian Press was first published on March 14, 2022.

    Colette Derworiz, The Canadian Press
    UCP blocks proposed Alberta NDP bill to prevent coal mining in Rockies

    EDMONTON — Alberta's United Conservative government has refused for the second time to move ahead with an Opposition bill that would have placed legally enforceable restrictions on coal mining in the Rocky Mountains.
    © Provided by The Canadian Press

    That shuffles the Eastern Slopes Protection Act back to a legislative committee that could rule the bill won't proceed at all.

    On Monday, the Opposition New Democrats retabled the private member's bill that would have substituted actual legislation for an order from Energy Minister Sonya Savage restricting coal mining in the Rocky Mountains. NDP Leader Rachel Notley, the bill's sponsor, said a politician's promise isn't enough to protect those much-loved landscapes.

    "A ministerial order can be changed overnight without any public oversight," said Notley.

    UCP MLAs refused to grant the unanimous consent the bill needed to move directly to second reading. It now returns to the all-party Standing Committee on Private Bills and Private Members' Bills, which vets private member's bills that are brought forward.

    Earlier this month, the government announced it would extend a pause on coal mine exploration and development across a long stretch of Alberta's Rocky Mountains and eastern slopes. That pause will continue until land use plans for the areas are complete and lay out specific rules for industrial development.

    Those protections, however, rely on the order from Savage that can be revoked without public consultation or legislative debate.

    That's not good enough, said Notley.

    "The Eastern Slopes Protection Act does in law what the UCP have refused to do," she said. "Protection by legislation as opposed to ministerial order is absolutely critical."

    In the legislature Monday, Savage promised that her order would remain in place.

    "We have fully protected the eastern slopes," she said.

    "Nobody's going to remove that ministerial order. Land-use planning is going to be completed."

    Notley's bill would ban all coal development on the most sensitive lands, including lands already leased for exploration, and would cancel leases granted for those lands. It would force any mines proposed for other areas to conform to a land use plan. And it would block the province's energy regulator from issuing any coal permits on those lands.

    Other than enshrining its protections in legislation, it's similar to what Savage announced on March 4.

    Notley's bill is identical to one she proposed last spring. That bill died on the order paper when the legislature refused unanimous consent to a request for a special debate on the bill.

    Notley had hoped the legislature would give consent this time around and continue to second reading. It's failure sends the bill back to the same committee it cleared unanimously in 2021.

    This report by The Canadian Press was first published March 14, 2022.

    — Follow Bob Weber on Twitter at @row1960

    Bob Weber, The Canadian Press
    Opinion: It's time ditch to Alberta's 'Frankenstein' draft curriculum

    Angela Grace 

    It has now been nearly a year since the 2021 draft curriculum was released. The initial public outcry resulted in the immediate development of the 39,000-plus strong Albertans Reject Curriculum Draft Facebook group and the Alberta Curriculum Analysis website , where educational experts submitted their initial reviews of the draft curriculum from educational best practice standards.
    © Provided by Edmonton Journal 
    FORMER SUNDAY SCHOOL TEACHER Education Minister Adriana LaGrange.

    The initial outcry clearly outlined significant problems with the draft: issues of plagiarism , whitewashed content that would contribute to systemic racism , Indigenous leaders felt tokenized and used , the draft was filled with rote memorization and lack of critical thinking , mental health experts and dieticians said it would contribute to eating disorders and poor mental health , and parents are concerned it will not prepare children adequately for their future .

    Following the initial outcry, other significant issues emerged. First, there was a 99-per-cent non-confidence vote in the minister of education . A freedom of information and protection of privacy process revealed possible political interference in the curriculum development process . The same people who wrote the elementary draft were re-hired to write the junior and senior high drafts . Fifty-six out of 61 school boards refused to pilot the draft curriculum , meaning that less than one per cent of schools will have piloted parts of the draft for a few weeks. This is insufficient prior to implementing any program, let alone a curriculum that will impact hundreds of thousands of children’s lives for the next 30-plus years.

    When the draft was leaked in October, 2020 , the minister of education scrambled to appoint 100 teachers to provide feedback under a non-disclosure agreement. This last-minute scramble indicated there was no prior intention to include teacher input in the draft curriculum. Over a year later when the non-disclosure agreement was lifted, the same teachers reported that they only had 1.5 days to review the entire draft and their feedback was ignored .

    Instead of listening to the educational experts, teacher, and parent outcries, the minister of education proceeded with online “Have your Say” surveys, where anyone could anonymously submit feedback. The draft curriculum then became a moving target with wording changes happening daily. This has resulted in a Frankenstein, cut-and-paste draft based on random and anonymous input, most of which will not be grounded in educational best practices. Simple wording changes cannot repair the fundamental flaws of this draft.

    In December 2021, significant public pressure led to the “pause” in the implementation of parts of the draft, with the minister of education announcing “significant steps to address feedback from parents, teachers and subject matter experts.” These include an online survey completed by February 2022, piloting by a handful of schools, and the “curriculum engagement sessions” facilitated by the hired Argyle PR firm in February 2022. The report from Argyle is being sent to the minister of education this spring. Will the public have the opportunity to review the results of the online survey, the reports written by the schools that piloted the draft for a few weeks, and the Argyle PR report? These reports need to be made public.

    Budget 2022 included $191 million to implement the contentious draft curriculum over the next three years. This is over and above the $64.4-million 2018 draft curriculum that was “ practical, well supported from partners, stakeholders, and Albertans .” The truth is, we don’t actually know how much taxpayer money has been spent on this contentious draft to date.

    All of this is very problematic. We now have a Frankenstein draft elementary curriculum that teachers, parents, and subject matter experts declared an epic fail. It is an “ inadequate, cobbled-together draft ” written behind closed doors by a few hand-selected individuals, rather than being a collaborative, nonpartisan effort with our children’s best interests in mind.

    In short, this curriculum is absurd. The premier and minister of education are bound and determined to implement it in September 2022. No matter what political party is in power, Albertans need to ask themselves, “Is this really the elementary education we want for our children?” I know for this Albertan, along with every other parent, teacher, and educational expert who has spoken out loud and clear, it’s time to ditch the draft.

    Angela Grace is a registered psychologist, former elementary teacher, and steering committee member of the Alberta Curriculum Analysis Website.
    CLASS WAR
    Alberta government seeking 11 per cent wage cuts for some health-care workers

    Janet French 
       
    © Chris Beauchamp for Alberta Health Services Huan Zhang, a respiratory therapist at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Grande Prairie, Alta., receives the COVID-19 vaccine during the pandemic. Respiratory therapists are among Health Sciences Association of…

    Alberta Health Services is seeking "insulting" wage cuts from front-line workers who were most pivotal in responding to COVID-19, the Health Sciences Association of Alberta says.

    "Given all that our members have worked through in the last two years in particular, through the pandemic — [it's] very insulting and discouraging," said Leanne Alfaro, HSAA vice-president.

    The union, which represents respiratory therapists, social workers, speech language pathologists and other health-care workers, says there is a huge gap between its and the government's opening bargaining positions.

    About 20,000 union members have been without a contract since March 31, 2020. Bargaining was delayed by the pandemic and began last October.

    HSAA wants four years of wage increases, to help account for inflation: 2.6 per cent the first year, 4.2 per cent the second year, 4.7 per cent in the third year and around 3.7 per cent in the fourth year, Alfaro said.


    Members haven't had new wage increases since 2016.

    The union says AHS is proposing three years of a frozen wage grid and a one per cent increase across the board in 2023.

    But they're also seeking job-specific cuts for 57 per cent of the workers, including nearly 11 per cent rollbacks for social workers and pharmacy technicians. HSAA said the proposal includes an 8.7 per cent cut for speech language pathologists and 8.1 per cent slash for respiratory therapists.


    Proposed Alberta Health Services rollbacks

    Neither the government nor AHS would confirm the numbers. The finance minister's office won't say how much money such rollbacks would save.

    "AHS respects the bargaining process and will not bargain in public or share details of bargaining while it is underway," AHS spokesperson Kerry Williamson said in an email.

    In the legislature during question period, Health Minister Jason Copping said the parties' positions are only a starting point. He pointed to an agreement struck last year with the United Nurses of Alberta, in which the government initially sought pay cuts. Nurses wound up with wage increases.

    Copping said the United Conservative Party government is investing in the health-care system.

    "We are focused on increasing our staff," he said. "We are focused on increasing our investment in health care, and we'll deliver."

    Alfaro said the government's rationale for wage cuts is to bring salaries for some professionals in line with colleagues in some other provinces.

    She said Alberta is competing globally for some of these professionals and reducing their salaries could exacerbate staff shortages.

    NDP mental health and addictions critic Lori Sigurdson said it's foolhardy to cut social workers' pay in the midst of a deadly opioid poisoning crisis, while homelessness grows and workers are handling higher case loads due to program cuts.

    "It's demoralizing for front-line staff, so certainly, many are stepping away," she said.

    NDP health critic David Shepherd said the proposed wage cuts are counterintuitive for a government that has promised to expand the capacity of the health-care system.

    "This is a brutal insult to all Albertans who have put themselves in harm's way throughout this pandemic and who have been working to protect Albertans throughout their entire careers," Shepherd said.

    AHS proposing significant pay cuts for social workers as part of contract negotiations

    Ashley Joannou 
    © Provided by Edmonton Journal The Alberta Health Services building located on Southport Rd. S.W. in Calgary on Feb. 24, 2021.

    Alberta Health Services is proposing wage cuts to a dozen professions, including a more than 10 per cent rollback for social workers and pharmacy technicians, as part of its opening bid in contract negotiations with the Health Sciences Association of Alberta.

    The health authority is suggesting wage cuts for about 57 per cent of the union’s members covering jobs that also include occupational therapists, respiratory therapists, speech language pathologists and pharmacists.

    The chairwoman of the union’s bargaining committee, Leanne Alfaro, said members are feeling disappointed and disrespected by the offer and it won’t be accepted.

    “Our members’ mandate has not changed. That was no rollbacks, no concessions, job security, and also to increase workplace health and safety and wellness for our members,” she told Postmedia Monday.

    AHS’s collective agreement with HSAA expired at the end of March 2020 and the two sides began collective bargaining in October 2021 after agreeing to hit pause as a result of the pandemic.

    Union seeking wage increases


    While AHS is proposing rollbacks targeting specific professions, HSAA’s opening offer calls for increases for all members across the board.

    Along with cost of living increases, the union is asking for a 1.5 per cent wage increase for members in 2020 followed by a one per cent increase for the three years after that, Alfaro said.

    In the legislature Monday, Health Minister Jason Copping said HSAA’s proposal amounts to a 15 per cent increase over four years.

    “These are opening positions. I am hopeful that the parties will be able to negotiate through this and reach a fair agreement,” he said.

    Alfaro said AHS is arguing that Alberta wages need to be brought in line with pay found in Ontario. But she says almost all jobs across the province have higher wages than in other jurisdictions.

    “So we’re not sure why health care would need to be targeted specifically. Particularly after we’re still not out of the pandemic and we’ve been providing vital care for Albertans for over the last two years,” she said.
    ‘A brutal insult:’ NDP

    The Official Opposition took a swing at the government Monday for proposing wage cuts for health-care workers at a time when Finance Minister Travis Toews has approved potential wage increases of between three and 39 per cent for employees of the Alberta Investment Management Corporation (AIMCo).

    “This is a brutal insult to all Albertans who have put themselves in harm’s way throughout this pandemic and who’ve been working to protect their fellow Albertans for their entire career. Respiratory therapists, paramedics, lab technicians, so many others, they are heroes and their work isn’t done,” NDP health critic David Shepherd said Monday.

    “They continue to step up under significant pressure to support the health and save the lives of Albertans as we recover from the COVID 19 pandemic but the UCP wants to slash their wages at the same time as they want to hand massive raises to executives at AIMCo. I don’t think that’s going to pass the smell test for any Albertans.”
    © File photo NDP Health Critic David Shepherd during a news conference in Edmonton on Dec. 13, 2021.

    Lori Sigurdson, NDP critic for mental health and addictions, said she was particularly concerned about the proposed cuts to social workers’ wages.

    “We’re in the midst of a substance use and mental health crisis in Alberta. The UCP claims to be concerned about this and yet they want to roll back the wages and the pay of Albertans struggling on the frontlines in this crisis,” she said.

    HSAA and AHS are set to return to the bargaining table at the end of March.

    The full list of proposed wage rollbacks is:
    Pharmacy technician — 10.93 per cent
    Social worker — 10.90 per cent
    Diagnostic sonographer — 1.87 per cent
    Dietician — 0.88 per cent
    Advanced care paramedic — 0.28 per cent
    Health information management professional — 7.49 per cent
    Occupational therapist — 5.39 per cent
    Pharmacist — 5.10 per cent
    Physiotherapist — 2.33 per cent
    Respiratory therapist — 8.05 per cent
    Speech language pathologist — 8.69 per cent
    Therapy assistant — 2.35 per cent