Saturday, May 28, 2022

 

Urban Grassroots


Bram Büscher and Robert Fletcher point to the need for profound systemic change if we are to ensure the integrity of our natural world and its ability to regenerate so that future generations may thrive. The ecological emergency is now; further delay only intensifies the crisis. The core question for all our efforts at protecting biodiversity is how to create a virtuous feedback loop that (1) supports nature’s regeneration and (2) generates stronger political will.

Clearly social transformation can take years of preparation, building solidarity among the constituency advocating for change. This work requires daily habit building as well as mobilizations and political strategies. Yet, when the dam bursts, mainstream adoption of new values and institutions can happen quickly, sometimes virtually overnight (see gay marriage or the fall of the Berlin Wall). The Great Transition framework asserts that human history is punctuated by collective action seizing the possible from the jaws of the probable; with pragmatic hope, we can catalyze collective action powerful enough to bend the arc of history toward a thriving planetary civilization. As with other aspects of the GT, the concept of “convivial conservation” begs the question: how?

Cities might not be the obvious place to begin if our goal is large-scale habitat conservation and transformation of industrial agriculture. However, as the urban habitat is where we encounter the most people in their daily routines, working in cities is critical for generating the politics for change. This work will look different in different parts of our world as there are different cultural and economic challenges.

Using my work as the example with which I am most familiar, the Boston Food Forest Coalition (BFFC) aims to endow healthy food forests as part of the renewable green infrastructure of Boston. In fifty years time, at a slow and steady rate of growth, this could mean more than a hundred food forests have taken root throughout the city (each with their own annual harvest festivals and cultural events). Every healthy food forest park is a garden of connectivity, renewing community leadership for adaptation and resilience, and signifies a cultural realignment of urban life with the natural world, creating nourishing relationships between neighbors, land, and food. Together, we are asking a vital question: How do we embody the ideal of the “beloved community” (in which all people are cherished and nurtured) as we engage gracefully with the work of realigning humanity with nature?

BFFC responds to the global crisis by inviting people to join together in the adventure of adapting our lives, urban infrastructure, economic relations, and mental models to create a thriving future for future generations in harmony with the web of life. BFFC makes this journey tangible and immediate, planting trees today that will bear fruit for decades. BFFC embodies a new culture (e.g., collective land ownership), teaches new practices, and grows a learning community. The food production aspect of food forests is not the only way to do urban agriculture, but it is a particularly innovative way to bring ecological agriculture principles into the city to grow more per square foot than conventional agriculture does in terms of food crops while creating space for nature to live side-by-side with humans.

The beauty of BFFC is that it is not just about food and urban agriculture; it is about exercising the “Democracy Muscle” through collective action. Growing the commons by planting new food forests is weaving a web of mutual aid among neighbors, city officials, and local leaders. As Boston transforms, so do other cities in a global effort to realign lifestyles and the infrastructure that supports new ways of living with the natural world. Nature’s capacity to regenerate the complex web of life is truly astonishing.

BFFC emerges from grassroots energy, and this energy is always deeply personal. In my case, I have two young daughters, 6 and 9 years old, and like all children, they are in love with their world and thrilled to be discovering its nuances and complexity. It is important to emphasize that they are also realizing that they are inheriting a world in crisis. I believe having tangible examples of the adults in their world coming together and trying to face that crisis head-on is critical. Yes, the climate is changing, and we don’t know what’s going to grow here in the future. The only way we’re going to figure that out is by getting out there and experimenting and doing the observations and the citizen science and rebuilding cities so that they are in balance with nature, and then lead the way in terms of how to get involved and do that work. That is what I want to see now and in the future. I want to see more connection to the next generation, more ability to bring them along and say, “Welcome to the world you’re inheriting, and we’re not just gifting you a crisis; we’re also gifting you our best efforts and ways to come up with continued sustainable solutions.” This, for me, is the locus of the needed work of systems change and cultural transformation.

  • Originally published as part of the forum “Conservation at the Crossroads.” Facebook
  • Orion Kriegman is the founding executive director of the Boston Food Forest Coalition and played a major role in the conception of Egleston Community Orchard in Jamaica Plain. Read other articles by Orion.
    Protest in Liverpool over plans to send refugees to Rwanda


    Saturday 28 May 2022,

    A protest has taken place in Liverpool over controversial plans to send refugees to Rwanda.

    A hundred refugees and asylum seekers are currently being housed at Home Office accommodation for refugees or asylum seekers in Liverpool.

    The refugee charity, Care4Calais believe they could be amongst the first to be deported under the government's 'Rwanda policy'.

    Campaigners of all ages gathered close to the Chinese Arch on Saturday 28 May for a small rally.

    Campaigners of all ages gathered near the Chinese Arch
    Credit: ITV news

    The Home Office says the scheme will discourage dangerous and illegal journeys to the UK and stop the dangerous trade of people trafficking.

    Demonstrators are disputing claims Rwanda is the ideal solution for those seeking to rebuild their lives and have described it as a 'vicious policy'.

    Many are said to be 'terrified' of being put on a plane to a country, known for it's human rights abuses.

    Rwanda would take responsibility for the people who make the more than 4,000 mile journey. If they are successful in the asylum process, they would have long-term accommodation in Rwanda.

    Campaigners say Liverpool should be able to welcome all refugees and asylum seekers
    Credit: ITV news

    Crossing the Channel in small boats is to be made a crime and those who are allowed to stay in the UK will have to live in strictly-controlled camp-like environments while their cases are considered, the paper said.

    The Home Secretary Priti Patel said the scheme was needed to "save countless lives" from human trafficking.

    The scheme is part of new plans to tackle people-smuggling gangs and increase UK operations in the Channel.

    The plans to offshore asylum seekers to Rwanda were announced on 14 April and are the subject of several legal challenges.

    Many asylum seekers have reported being terrified of being sent to Rwanda.

    Refugee charity prepares legal challenge to UK’s Rwanda asylum plan
    May 23, 2022
    Volunteer-led charity Care4Calais are preparing a legal challenge against the government over the Rwanda asylum plan, which will send asylum seekers arriving into the UK to Rwanda for processing and resettlement. 


    A Home Office spokesperson said:

    "Rwanda is a safe and stable country, which has been recognised globally for their record in welcoming and integrating migrants and asylum seekers. It will be able to offer a home, stability, and a future for those in need.

    "We are fully committed to working with Rwanda to offer safety to those seeking asylum and ultimately save lives through this innovative, ambitious partnership."

    “The world-leading Migration Partnership will overhaul our broken asylum system, which is currently costing the UK taxpayer £1.5bn a year – the highest amount in two decades."

    Carine Kanimba & Michela Wrong, The Long Tentacles of Rwanda’s Dictatorship

    May 26, 2022






     

    War on a Burning Earth

    According to the Fermi Paradoxthe failure to date to achieve radio communication between Earth and extraterrestrial civilizations can be attributed to their inevitable short-term self-destruction, a consequence of uncontrolled dispersion of toxic substances, contamination of air, water and land, and construction of deadly weapons. On Earth this includes saturation of the atmosphere by greenhouse gases and production of nuclear weapons. The most extensive mass extinction event in the history of Earth, represented by the Permian-Triassic boundary 251 million years-ago, involved warming, acidification and oxygen depletion of the oceans, with consequent emanations of toxic H2S and CH4, leading to a loss of some 57% of biological families, 83% of genera and 81% of marine species.

    If the history of the 21st century is ever written it would report that, while large parts of the planet were becoming uninhabitable, the extreme rate and scale of global warming and the migration of climate zones (>100 km per decade), the extent of polar ice melting, ocean warming and acidification, microplastic pollution and methane release from permafrost, threatened to develop into one of the most extensive mass extinction events in the geological history of planet Earth.

    As concentrations of atmospheric greenhouse gases exceed 500 ppm CO2-equivalents, consistent with global temperatures to well above 4oC and threatening to rise at a higher rate than those of the great mass extinctions. Climate scientists have been either silenced or replaced by an army of economists and politicians mostly ignorant of the physics and chemistry of the atmosphere, but quantifying the cost-benefit economies of mitigation like corner shop grocers. Proposed mitigation action were mostly focused on reduction of emissions, neglecting the amplifying feedbacks and tipping points projected by leading climate scientists such as James Hansen.

    But climate change was not the only threat hanging over the head of humanity and nature. As nations kept proliferating atomic weapons, with time the probability of a nuclear war increased exponentially. At the root of the MAD (mutual assured destruction) policy, or omnicide, resides the deep tribalism and herd mentality of the species, hinging on race, religion, ideology, territorial claims and the concept of an “enemy” perpetrated by demagogues and warmongers, leading to an Orwellian 1984 world where “Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia,” as in the current “forever wars.” Prior to World War I two social forces collided, fascism and socialism. While the former has changed appearances, the latter weakened. At the core of superpower conflict between the Anglo-Saxon world and the Slavic or Chinese worlds are claims of moral superiority, but in reality naked grabs for power.

    At the centre of human conscience is its mythological nature, a mindset closely related to the mastery of fire where, for longer than one million years, Homo erectus, perched at campfire, watching the flickering flames, has grown its insights and imagination, developing a fear of death, dreaming of omniscience and omnipotence, aspiring for eternal life.

    As civilization developed in the Neolithic these sentiments drove humans to construct pyramids to enshrine immortality, undertake human sacrifice, to perpetrate death to appease the gods, expressed in modern times through world wars.

    For an intelligent species to be able to explore the solar system planets but fail to protect its own home planet defies explanation. For a species to magnify its entropic effect on nature by orders of magnitude, developing cerebral powers which allow it to become the intelligent eyes through which the Universe explores itself, hints at yet unknown natural laws which underlie life, consciousness and complexity.

    FacebookTwitterReddit
    Dr Andrew Glikson is with the Research School of Earth Science & School of Archaeology & Anthropology at Australian National University in Canberra. He can be reached at: andrew.glikson@anu.edu.auRead other articles by Andrew.
    The 'extreme profession' that hunts the most powerful storms on Earth

    By Allison Finch, AccuWeather, Accuweather.com

    This undated U.S. Air force photo shows a WC-130J Hercules from the 53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron "Hurricane Hunters" as it flies the first mission of the 2008 hurricane season.
     File Photo by James B. Pritchett/U.S. Air Force | License Photo

    Hard-core scientists aboard specially equipped National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration aircraft play an integral role in hurricane forecasting.

    Data collected from these high-flying and high-tech meteorological stations in the midst of a storm help forecasters make more accurate predictions during a powerful hurricane while researchers gain a better understanding of how storms evolve, which improves forecast models.

    But the job is not for the faint of heart.

    In an interview with AccuWeather national reporter Jillian Angeline, NOAA Flight Director Quinn Kalen described how these "hurricane hunters" take on these daring missions flying into such fierce storms.

    Once positioned correctly above a hurricane, at an altitude of about 45,000 feet, a scientist releases a dropsonde, a weather device specially designed to be dropped out of an aircraft. As the dropsonde is falling through the hurricane, it collects data from the surrounding atmosphere, such as temperature, humidity and wind direction and velocity, which is then sent back to the aircraft via radio transmission.

    "We're getting an entire column of data," Kalen explained. "It takes about 15 to 20 minutes for that dropsonde to fall. So that's a lot of data. The [dropsonde] is getting data every quarter of a second."


    One of many dropsondes that are released into a hurricane to gather data.

    Research flights last 8.5 hours, and roughly 30 dropsondes are released during that time, gathering approximately 504,000 data points per flight, according to University Corporation for Atmospheric Research.

    All of these data points are collected and transmitted back to the mainland, where scientists import them to forecast models.

    On top of the data collected by the dropsondes, the plane, which is named after the Muppet character Gonzo, is outfitted with weather radar that collects even more data.

    "The shape of the nose radar is why we call this Gonzo," Kalen said. "It's kind of a weird nose. Gonzo has that weird nose."

    The information collected around and above the hurricane from the radars on either end of the plane help scientists create a detailed picture of the atmosphere surrounding the hurricane. Specifically, the tail Doppler radar, located on the back of the plane, collects radar images of the convection within a hurricane as the plane flies.

    Kalen noted that the view from the plane right above the hurricane resembles fog. Not much can be seen from the plane's window until it is away from the storm.


    Quinn Kalen, NOAA flight director, talks about his role as a hurricane hunter.

    "It's essentially like you're flying in fog," Kalen said. "We'll get a real good view of the hurricane, not when we're in it but when we're out of it."

    National Hurricane Center Director Ken Graham told AccuWeather the extremely valuable information hurricane hunters gather has improved the accuracy of hurricane models by 10-15 and has improved the hurricane intensity forecast by 20.

    "They're heroes going towards the storm and it's bumpy. But they give us the data that we need," Graham said about the scientists that fly into hurricanes.

    The role does come with plenty of risks. Kalen said scientists must always have an exit plan in case it gets too dangerous.

    "It's definitely an extreme profession. Definitely like, it's the intensity of it. The intensity of the storm, of course, but the dependency on your job to do well is high," Kalen said, adding that flight directors like himself serve as a "liaison" between the pilots and scientists.

    The data collected from these flights will be important in the incoming months as AccuWeather meteorologists predict another busy hurricane season this year, with six to eight hurricanes -- three to five of which are forecast to reach major hurricane status.
    Sri Lanka fuel shortage set to ease; police clash with protesters

    Students protest near the President's House amid the country's economic crisis, in Colombo











    May 19, 2022·
    By Uditha Jayasinghe and Devjyot Ghoshal

    COLOMBO (Reuters) -Sri Lanka's central bank has secured foreign exchange to pay for fuel and cooking gas shipments that will ease crippling shortages, its governor said on Thursday, but police fired tear gas and water canon to push back student protesters.

    Most of Sri Lanka's petrol stations have run dry as the island nation battles its most devastating economic crisis since independence in 1948. At some pumps in the commercial capital, Colombo, dozens of people stood in lines holding plastic jerry cans, as troops in combat gear and armed with assault rifles patrolled the streets. Traffic was extremely light.

    Residents said most people were staying at home because of the lack of transport.

    Hundreds of students carrying black flags marched on Colombo's central Fort area, chanting slogans against the government. Police fired repeated rounds of tear gas and water canon to push them back, according to a Reuters witness.

    Central bank Governor P. Nandalal Weerasinghe told a news conference adequate dollars had been released to pay for fuel and cooking gas shipments, utilising in part $130 million received from the World Bank and remittances from Sri Lankans working overseas.

    He was speaking after the central bank held interest rates steady at a policy meeting, citing a massive 7 percentage point increase in April that it said was working its way through the system.

    The country was more politically and economically stable, Weerasinghe said, adding that he would stay on in his post. He told reporters on May 11 he would resign in two weeks in the absence of political stability as any steps the bank took to address the economic crisis would not be successful amid turmoil.

    Opposition parliamentarian Ranil Wickremesinghe was named prime minister last week and he has made four cabinet appointments. However, he has yet to name a finance minister.

    Inflation could rise further to a staggering 40% in the next couple of months but it was being driven largely by supply-side pressures and measures by the bank and government were already reining in demand-side inflation, the central bank governor added.

    Inflation hit 29.8% in April with food prices up 46.6% year-on-year.

    Sri Lanka's economic crisis has come from the confluence of the COVID-19 pandemic battering the tourism-reliant economy, rising oil prices and populist tax cuts by the government of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa and his brother, Mahinda, who resigned as prime minister last week.

    Other factors have included heavily subsidised domestic prices of fuel and a decision to ban the import of chemical fertilisers, which devastated the agriculture sector.

    "This is an economy that hasn't actually fully recovered from the pandemic yet," said Christian De Guzman, senior vice president sovereign risk at Moody's. "Tourism, which is one of their engines of growth, hasn't come back."

    TEST SUPPORT


    Sri Lanka is also officially now in default on its sovereign debt as a so-called grace period to make some already-overdue bond interest payments expired on Wednesday.

    Weerasinghe said plans for a debt restructuring were almost finalised and he would be submitting a proposal to the cabinet soon.

    "We are in pre-emptive default," he said. "Our position is very clear, until there is a debt restructure, we cannot repay."

    The central bank said energy and utility prices needed to be urgently revised, and analysts said the prime minister's ability to push reforms through parliament and overcome public anger would be crucial.

    "They need to bring in critical reforms and other measures to parliament to test their support and see if they really have consensus and stability," said Shehan Cooray, head of research at Acuity Stockbrokers in Colombo.

    He added, however, that the situation had taken a turn for the better. "Given that there was a point where it was even difficult to find a governor, the fact that he has decided to remain is a good thing," Cooray said.

    A spokesperson for the International Monetary Fund said on Thursday the fund was monitoring developments very closely and that a virtual mission to Sri Lanka was expected to conclude technical talks on a potential loan program to country on May 24.

    Wickremesinghe, speaking in parliament, said the government was working to release six fuel shipments that had arrived at Colombo's port.

    "There are two petrol shipments among them but this will not end the shortages," he said, adding that supplies had been locked in only until mid-June.

    "Our aim now is to reduce the lines and find a way to start a fuel reserve so even if a couple of shipments are missed there is fuel available."

    However, there is considerable opposition to him. Protesters agitating for the removal of the Rajapaksa brothers say he is their stooge.

    (Additional reporting by Swati Bhat, David Lawder and Jorgelina do Rosario; Writing by Raju Gopalakrishnan; Editing by Robert Birsel and Chizu Nomiyama)


    Beekeepers and communists: how environmentalists started a global conversation
    People rally outside the UN conference on the human environment (UNCHE) in Stockholm in June 1972.
     Photograph: Yutaka Nagata/UN Photo

    The world’s longest serving environment correspondent explains the origins of a slow and continuing journey

    Geoffrey Lean
    Sat 28 May 2022


    It all began with Högertrafikomläggningen, Swedish for “the right-hand traffic reorganisation”.

    On 3 September 1967, Sweden switched from driving on the left to driving on the right. The change mainly took place at night, but in Stockholm and Malmö all traffic stopped for most of the weekend while intersections were reconfigured.

    So sweet was the resulting city air that weekend that environmental enthusiasm went sky high. It was a moment that would change the world.

    Three months later Sweden, citing air and other pollution, asked the UN to hold the first-ever international environmental conference, initiating a process that would lead to a groundbreaking gathering in its capital in 5 June 1972, the 50th anniversary of which will be marked next week. This was the beginning of a long and slow struggle to find and agree global solutions to these newly understood global environment problem. Twenty years later, the Rio conference would follow in the same month, kicking off UN climate summits, the most recent of which was held in Glasgow last autumn.

    Bill Clinton, then a presidential candidate, speaks at press conference
     on the Rio Earth summit in June 1992. 
    Photograph: Ben Rusnak/AFP/Getty Images

    And yet critical mistakes were made at this early juncture. Progress, as we know, has been glacial in the years since. Now, looking back at the first steps on that journey, it’s hard not to see that, although in there were so many issues the conference got right, there were also some crucial issues it got wrong.

    The Stockholm conference – held in the city’s Folkets Hus the site of both a former prison and a theatre specialising in farces – gave green issues international import. In the 1960s, environmental issues had seemed local, not global. In Britain, for example, the last of the great London smogs killed 750 people in 1962, while tragedy struck four years later in Aberfan, Wales, with the collapse of a colliery spoil tip. In Japan, people wore masks against air pollution. There was drought in the Sahel. And in 1969 a passing train ignited oil in Ohio’s Cuyahoga River, setting it ablaze.

    But this was also a decade in which there were early stirrings of revolt against the environmental destruction. The World Wildlife Fund launched in 1961 with a special issue of the Daily Mirror carrying the front-page headline “DOOMED”. Rachel Carson’s book Silent Spring savaged pesticides the next year, and in 1969 an undergraduate Prince Charles first entered the fray, lobbying the then British prime minister, Harold Wilson, about Atlantic salmon at an event at the Finnish embassy.

    Firefighters tackle a burning oil spill on the Cuyahoga River in 1952. 
    Photograph: Bettmann/Bettmann Archive

    But these were isolated voices, denounced and dismissed by the powerful. Carson said the US chemical industry wanted to return to “the dark ages” where “insects and vermin would once again inherit the Earth”. The then US agriculture secretary wrote to former US President Dwight Eisenhower, saying that since Carson was unmarried, despite being “attractive”, she was “probably a communist”.

    The plan for an international conference in Stockholm initially had so little support that it was dismissively called “the Swedish matter” at the UN. It took two years of lobbying, against UK and French opposition, before the general assembly backed the proposal. As it happened, this (January 1970) was when I was told by a far-sighted editor at the Yorkshire Post that we needed to be covering this stuff and my long stint on the environment beat – the longest in the world as far as I am aware – began.

    A special issue of the Daily Mirror in 1961 to cover the launch of the WWF Launch. 
    Photograph: mirror.co.uk/

    Now the issue began taking off. The number of Americans concerned about air and water pollution doubled between 1965 and 1970, to 70%. That April, 20 million people demonstrated on the first Earth Day, leaving – to opponents’ delight – much litter behind them. Richard Nixon’s environment chief described Washington’s mood as “hysteria”, and the then US president devoted a quarter of that year’s State of the Union address to the issue. Over the next three years, he brought in 14 pieces of legislation laying the foundations of environmental US policy and institutions.

    In Britain in 1970, Ted Heath came to power and established one of the world’s first environment ministries (originally he wanted to call it the Department for Life until he realised that would make his pushy minister Peter Walker “secretary of state for life”).

    Developing world leaders were becoming worried, fearing wealthy countries would use environmental concern to deny them development. Those worries were not assuaged by the publication of two bestselling books: the Club of Rome’s Limits to Growth (the title says it) and A Blueprint for Survival by 30 top UK scientists, which called for deindustrialisation and extolled tribal societies. Alarmed, some considered boycotting Stockholm, with Brazil calling it “a rich man’s show”, and India and Nigeria also publicly expressing concern.
    Keith Johnson, of Jamaica, and general rapporteur of the conference UN conference on the human environment makes a statement. 
    Photograph: Yutaka Nagata/UN Photo

    The books had another effect, erroneously concentrating attention on finite “non-renewable resources”, like minerals and fossil fuels, which were projected to run out. Limits to Growth had a particularly strong impact, because – back in those days when computers were thought to be omniscient – the book’s authors had run a series of models that showed supplies collapsing as economic growth continued, causing “rather sudden and uncontrollable decline” in industrial capacity.

    Its fans were generally far less concerned about “renewable” resources like forests, fisheries and soils, as these would, by definition, replenish themselves. But, in practice, these were already being depleted so fast that they had no chance to recover, and their destruction has been at the heart of most of the big environmental crises of the past half century.

    Meanwhile, the shortages of minerals never took place at anything like the feared scale – and we now know that we have more oil, gas and coal than we can burn without ruining the climate.

    Such was the background against which the Stockholm conference got under way. In retrospect, far too little attention was paid to climate change – which was only beginning to arouse concern, despite having been identified as a potential crisis more than 100 years earlier – and to biodiversity. And, though the conference did come up with 109 recommendations, there would not be another big global summit on the environment for another 20 years.

    The conference outcome was uncertain until the last minute. The final issue of its newspaper, Eco, said negotiators could only agree on one thing as the end neared: “Either a declaration will be finalised – or it will not.” After a non-stop 14-hour session, it was – together with a 109-point action plan.

    A rush of international agreements followed – on marine pollution, endangered species, world heritage, acid rain, whaling, and much else, culminating in one of the most successful treaties of all time, saving the Earth’s vital ozone layer.

    An image from the Earth summit in Rio de Janeiro. 
    Photograph: Antonio RIBEIRO/Gamma-Rapho/Getty Images

    The concept of sustainable development had also emerged from the conference: equitable economic growth that preserved the environment for future generations. Nurtured by leading economists like Barbara Ward and boosted by the then Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi’s insistence that poverty was the worst form of pollution, it became one of the enduring legacies of the conference.

    Another was pioneering the participation of pressure groups: 258 attended, from Greenpeace to the International Federation of Beekeepers. And they made a difference – effectively pushing through a call to ban whaling.

    But momentum soon slowed. The 1973 oil crisis first seemed to reinforce environmentalism, stressing the precariousness of resources. But attention was diverted as an economic crisis, and then another price shock followed. Nixon – who had gone green out of political opportunism, not conviction – quickly dropped it (his infamous tapes recorded him likening environmentalists to “a bunch of damned animals”) as did other leaders. And the environment got pushed to the back of the shelf.

    Now there is another moment. Last year’s Cop26 summit in Glasgow achieved more than was expected, with governments giving themselves this year – until another summit, in Egypt in November – in which to do more. So far, not much has happened, but potential exists, not least to cut emissions of methane and similar pollutants, a hitherto neglected measure that could cut the rate of warming in half.

    The Indian prime minister, Indira Gandhi, is greeted by her Swedish counterpart, Olof Palme, on the first day of the conference. 
    Photograph: SCANPIX SWEDEN/AFP/Getty Images

    Also this year another summit will be asked to approve a 10-year strategy to protect nature and biodiversity.

    And what of economics, once thought to conflict so much with environmentalism? It is increasingly recognised that they must be in concert, that the old models of extractive capitalism just do not work, that the only way to forward is to embrace a circular economy and go green. Just this week a study by Deloitte said reaching net zero carbon emissions would benefit the world economy by $43tn (£34tn) over the next half century.

    It’s desperately late, long past time to stop driving, full tilt, down the wrong side of the road. Who’s for a global Högertrafikomläggningen?

    Nicaraguan migrants to the U.S. increased by 735%: 12,000 detentions in April alone

    Between January and April 2022, 53,714 Nicas were apprehended at the U.S. border. The total for the same period the year before was 6,433

    The number of Nicaraguans migrating to the United States has been multiplied by eight, if we compare the first quarters of 2021 and 2022 in terms of the number of migrants apprehended by US immigration authorities at that country’s southern borders. From January to April of last year, a total of 6,433 migrants from Nicaragua were registered at the border; meanwhile, from January to April of the current year, they totaled 53,714 according to data released from the US Customs and Border Protection Office.

    The numbers of Nicaraguans leaving the country reached a record last year, when more than 120,000 left for other countries, with the destination of choice being the United States. That year, there were 87,530 Nicaraguans detained at the US border. This strong tendency continued in 2022, surpassing an average of 10,000 Nicas registered each month – more than 300 each day.

    The significant increase in Nicaraguans emigrating comes amid the deepening sociopolitical crisis that has persisted in the country since 2018, when massive citizen protests were crushed by the Ortega- Murillo regime’s repression. The government’s violent crackdown left over 355 dead, thousands of wounded, hundreds of political prisoners, and tens of thousands of people displaced.

    In 2021, as the presidential elections approached in Nicaragua, the regime ramped up their repression, imprisoning the seven leading candidates that had aspired to run against Daniel Ortega. Authorities also jailed business leaders, journalists, human rights advocates, diplomats, political analysts, and civic leaders. At the same time, they consolidated a de facto police state. In the electoral process that resulted, an estimated 80% of eligible Nicaraguan citizens opted not to go to the polls, according to the independent organization Urnas Abiertas [Open Ballot Boxes]. The international community considered the resulting “victory” of Ortega and Murillo a political farce.

    Those repressive waves sparked the first significant increase in migration, and from that point on, it hasn’t slowed. The repression continues as well, and the persecution has sharpened, especially against civil society, with the cancelation of 199 NGOs in 2022 alone, and a fresh wave of attacks against the Catholic Church.

    Adding to the sociopolitical crisis is a severe economic downturn. After three years of recession in Nicaragua, there’s a dearth of formal employment and a rise in the cost of living. Currently, the cost of supplying a household with basic goods is estimated at US $184 more than the highest minimum wage offered in Nicaragua.

    Migration continues despite risks and obstacles

    Nicaraguans continue leaving their country in favor of an uncertain journey to the United States. It’s now the preferred destination, leaving Costa Rica in second place with 20,000 requests for asylum filed by Nicaraguans between January and March of this year. This tendency continues, despite the sizable risks entailed in this nearly 2,500-mile journey to the US border.

    The last months have seen an increase in denunciations from the families of some migrants who are kidnapped by cartels or criminal bands in Mexico. They have also denounced the inhumane conditions in which some coyotes have transported them, putting their lives at risk. A tragic example was that of Clorinda Alarcon, a 20-year-old pregnant mother who died of asphyxiation this past March, while locked in the back of a large truck with dozens of other migrants, including children.

    In recent weeks, at least 20 Nicaraguans have also drowned in the Rio Grande, the river that marks the border between the US and Mexico. Migrants heading to many of the major US border posts must cross this river in order to surrender themselves to the US authorities and ask for asylum. Their only other choice, attempting an illegal crossing, also involves crossing this river.

    Added to these life-threatening obstacles are those resulting from the US Government’s immigration policies, aimed at slowing the flow of migrants that has been estimated at 900,000 people in the first months of 2022 alone.

    Nicas are the ones most affected by the US “Remain in Mexico” policy

    In December 2021, the United States reestablished an immigration policy officially called Migrant Protection Protocols, more commonly known as “remain in Mexico”. This policy forces migrants seeking asylum in the United States to remain in Mexico, while US immigration judges process their applications.

    From then on, this policy has disproportionally affected Nicaraguan migrants, who represent over 60% of those turned back. A total of over 3,000 Nicaraguans were returned to wait in Mexican border cities since December.

    Reporters from Confidencial visited one of these cities, Ciudad Juarez, and spoke with two young people who were fleeing Nicaragua due to political persecution. They had been sent back from the border to live in shelters with limited conditions, fearfully aware that they’re in one of the world’s most dangerous cities. US authorities didn’t respond to our request to learn the reasons why Nicaraguans make up the majority of those who’ve been sent back under this policy.

    Despite controversy, Title 42 allowing “express removal”, continues in force

    The other US norm aimed at stemming the flow of migrants into that country is Title 42, a provision that has been in force since the pandemic began in 2020. Title 42 refers to a public health statute that allows the US government to bar people from entering the country during public health emergencies. Despite some attempts on the part of the Biden administration to end the use of this norm to turn away migrants, a Louisiana judge ruled on May 21 that it must continue to be enforced. They’re not deportations, but nearly immediate removals, in which the migrants end up back in Mexico or sent by air to their countries of origin.

    Organizations that defend migrant rights have accused the measure of violating human rights, since it contradicts the right of people to ask for international protection. In fact, according to another U.S. court order made public early in March 2022, migrant families with children can’t be expelled under Title 42 if they express fears of being persecuted or tortured if returned to their country. Such family groups must be interviewed by asylum officials.

    The U.S. borders “aren’t open”, and the country continues removing migrants “when appropriate” under Title 42. According to a message and two-minute video posted on Twitter May 24, by Alejandro Mayorkas, US secretary of Homeland Security: “the U.S. continues to enforce its immigration laws and restrictions on our southern border have not changed. Individuals and families continue to be subject to border restrictions, including expulsion.”

     Article Includes information from EFE

    This article was originally published in Spanish in Confidencial and translated by Havana Times


    'We have the power': Poles march for LGBTQ+ rights in Gdansk


    By Isabella Ronca and Hedy Beloucif

    GDANSK, Poland (Reuters) - Thousands of Poles marched to demand an end to homophobia on Saturday, as the northern port city of Gdansk hosted its seventh annual Equality March under the slogan "We have the power".

    Waving the rainbow flags of the LGBTQ+ community and the blue, pink and white transgender flag, the marchers made their way through the city holding placards with slogans like "We make love not war" and "Jesus would walk with us".

    According to a police spokeswoman around 7,500 people took part.

    "It's very difficult to be queer in Poland, so it's nice to find a place where you can be yourself," said 24-year-old Sabina Joeck.

    Gay rights are a highly divisive issue in predominantly Catholic Poland, and the country's ruling nationalists have made battling what they term LGBTQ+ "ideology" a key plank of election campaigns in recent years.

    Religious conservatives are bitterly opposed to what they say is an ideology bent on undermining the traditional family, while more liberal Poles say such attitudes result in widespread discrimination.

    A handful of protesters opposed to the march looked on holding Catholic rosary beads and a banner alleging that the LGBTQ+ "lobby" sought to sexualise children.

    "I am not against homosexuals, these are just ordinary people like us," said a protester who gave her name as Margaret. "But I don't want them to get to our children."

    Human rights groups reject accusations that teaching about LGBTQ+ issues in schools seeks to sexualise children.

    For Nikodem Mrozek, a 40-year-old mathematician who has taken part in the annual march since its inception, attitudes to LGBTQ+ people in Poland are improving, but the community is still demonised by some politicians.

    "Society and the mentality (of people) is getting better and better, but the political situation is getting worse and worse," he said, speaking before the march.

    (Reporting by Isabella Ronca and Hedy Beloucif in Gdansk, writing by Alan Charlish in Warsaw, Editing by Ros Russell)

    UK
    A £6 million superyacht has gone up in flames on the Torquay harbourside just before midday on Saturday.
     


    Superyacht worth £6m sinks in Torquay Harbour after setting on fire

    Fire crews battled the blaze on the 85ft yacht for hours as witnesses reported minor explosions


    Police have declared a major incident and warned residents to close their windows against noxious smoke.
    Photograph: Helen Brenton; Rob Hailstone

    Miranda Bryant and Nadeem Badshah
    Sat 28 May 2022 

    A superyacht estimated to be worth £6m has sunk after firefighters battled to extinguish a fire on the vessel while it was moored in a marina in south-west England.

    Devon and Somerset Fire and Rescue Service (DSFRS) said there was approximately 8,000 litres of fuel on the 85ft boat that led to people being evacuated from the marina in Torquay.

    By around 6pm, the fire was out and crews were working on damping down the pier, a DSFRS spokesperson said.

    The spokesperson added: “The boat has been sunk so it [the fire] is out now. It’s been handed over now to the Environment Agency and the harbourmaster.”

    Fire crews were called just before midday on Saturday to reports of the yacht on fire. More than two hours after the incident it was still ablaze as multiple fire crews attempted to put out the fire.


    At 3pm the fire service advised all residents in the area near the marina to keep their windows and doors closed due to “noxious fumes”, adding: “Crews are making steady progress extinguishing the fire.”

    Crews used the harbour masters boat to help try to put out the flames.

    The coastguard area commander for South Devon and South East Cornwall coastline said it was assisting Devon and Cornwall police in closing Torquay seafront.

    Witnesses reported “thick acrid plumes of smoke bellowing from Torquay Harbour”.

    “We stood and watched for around 10 minutes until the smoke began to affect our chests,” Georgina Cleasby, who was cycling home when she saw the fire, told ITV.
    Sign up to First Edition, our free daily newsletter – every weekday morning at 7am BST

    “There was so much smoke it obscured the sun. We heard a few minor explosions and could also see flames.”

    Devon and Cornwall police previously said the boat was “well alight and had broken from the mooring” but had since been secured by the fire service.

    They said nearby beaches were also being evacuated for public safety and there were multiple road closures in place, including along the promenade and waterfront areas and parts of Torbay Road, Belgrave Road and Shedden Hill.

    Fire services said the cause of the fire was unknown and that an investigation will follow.