Monday, November 14, 2022

CRIMINAL CRYPTO-CAPITALI$M

Fallout from crypto exchange FTX's collapse shows importance of regulation: Experts

The rapid collapse of crypto-exchange giant FTX shows the importance for the sector to be regulated, something that Canada has helped lead the way on, experts say.

Canada has numerous safeguards in place that would help prevent some of the alleged practices that went on at FTX, including the use of client funds for company trading, said Ryan Clements, chair in business law and regulation at the University of Calgary's Faculty of Law.

"We actually have in this country quite a robust regulatory framework that was created after Quadriga," said Clements, referring to the Canadian crypto exchange that collapsed in 2018, leading to $169 million in customer assets lost.

In an review compiled after Quadriga's downfall, the Ontario Securities Commission found its founder had committed fraud and the company operated like a Ponzi scheme.

"What happened at Quadriga was an old-fashioned fraud wrapped in modern technology," the OSC said in its 2020 report.

Clements said regulators rolled out changes after Quadriga's downfall, including rules around third parties holding crypto assets, the need for insurance and limits on what can be traded, all of which can benefit investors, said Clements.

"It's designed to provide both custodial and other prudential measures for crypto asset trading platforms, but also marketplace controls, also things like client cash segregation and conflict avoidance measures."

Canadian exchanges have been emphasizing their adherence to these measures in recent days as they try and distance themselves from the likes of FTX.

"Although some see regulation as overreaching, it plays a critical role in ensuring that these tragedies do not happen," said Coinsquare chief executive Martin Piszel in a statement.

"While we were working with regulators, building out regulatory technology and compliance infrastructure, our global competitors were launching products like 100x margin, unregulated derivatives products, and lending out client assets," he said, noting that Coinsquare is the first crypto trading platform registered through the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada.

"All of us have now seen the results of some of these experiments," Piszel said.

While Canadian efforts are ahead in some ways, regulators may need to put more effort into cracking down on access to international exchanges, said Clements, which provide riskier trades and less oversight.

"If you're a Canadian you should be using a registered trading platform. Because there are better controls for you. Right, the problem is these huge offshore platforms ... just because something bigger and just because something has celebrity endorsements doesn't necessarily mean it's safer."

The FTX issues show some clear flaws in the wider crypto sector, said Henry Kim, an associate professor at York University's Schulich School of Business and director of the school's Blockchain.Lab.

"It says there's not enough regulation. It says that it's too centralized. It says that it's basically we still don't have enough grown-ups in the room."

He advised that those in the crypto space should assess what their goals are, and if they're more of an investor where they'll buy and hold for the long term they should aim for the most established exchanges.

"If you're going to be an investor, then do your research and be at the most blue-chip exchanges."

The collapse of FTX, which was one of the world's crypto exchange before it fell apart, shows how difficult that research can be, and how much of a wider impact this development will have.

"There's a contagion effect because FTX was the gold standard, because they were heavily involved with investment," said Kim.

Several Canadian crypto companies have already announced some knock-on effects from FTX.

Calgary-based Bitvo Inc. announced in June that FTX was going to buy it for an undisclosed sum. On Monday, the company clarified that the transaction has not closed and it remains independent from the FTX group of companies.

The company also emphasized that it operates on a full reserve basis and in compliance with Canadian regulations.

For those who are losing faith in exchanges there is always the option of not holding cryptocurrency on an exchange, but Kim warns that with the risks of physical theft and lost passwords and other issues it's not to be taken casually either.

"For those that are really, really savvy, they can still hold crypto in their wallets, but you have to be pretty savvy. You have to know what you're doing. And I wouldn't advise that unless you do."


FTX fiasco sparks billions of dollars of outflows from exchanges

The spectacular collapse of 30-year-old Sam Bankman-Fried's crypto empire has fueled a spike in outflows across global crypto exchanges. Users yanked a net $3.7 billion worth of Bitcoin and $2.5 billion of Ether in the week from Sunday, Nov. 6 to Sunday, Nov. 13, according to data provider CryptoQuant. 

They withdrew more than $2 billion worth of many of the largest stablecoins over the same timeframe, according to CryptoQuant, which tracks data from most major exchanges. 

 

The past week has “undoubtedly been one of the darkest in the history of cryptocurrency,” said Sasha Ivanov, founder of blockchain platform Waves, in a statement. “It's disheartening to see the value of this fundamental technology diminished due to the collapse of what many felt was a leading exchange.”

The fall of Bahamas-based FTX, which just recently was widely perceived as among the most dependable names in the sector, has sparked fresh concerns over the loosely-regulated nature of crypto companies and what guardrails are in place to safely oversee clients' assets. FTX is the latest in a long list of large crypto businesses to come undone this year, including hedge fund Three Arrows Capital, crypto lender Celsius Network and broker Voyager Digital. 

The saga started on Sunday, Nov. 6 when a tweet from Binance's “CZ” cast doubt on the strength of Alameda Research, the trading firm affiliated with Bankman-Fried's exchange. The ensuing panic among FTX.com's investors became so intense that they collectively pulled $430 million worth of Bitcoin from the three-year-old exchange in just four days. The company had held more than 20,000 Bitcoin going into Nov. 6, CryptoQuant data shows. That sank to nearly zero by Wednesday, Nov. 9 as customers fled over worries about FTX's financial health.

Binance proposing a tentative takeover of the exchange and then backtracking on the offer during this time didn't help matters. On Thursday, Bankman-Fried tweeted that Alameda Research would be shuttered and by Friday, FTX Group had begun bankruptcy proceedings. 

The leveling of another centralized crypto player in 2022 is emboldening calls for users to hold their own assets, rather than entrusting them to third-parties. 

“This is the latest and biggest failure of a centralized entity in crypto and it could mark the bitter end of their existence,” stated Ivanov. “The foundation of cryptocurrency is decentralized blockchain technology and I expect this downturn to result in the industry switching focus back to those core values.” 

Since last week, crypto exchanges like OKX, KuCoin, Poloniex and Huobi have vowed to increase transparency and share their so-called “proof of reserves.” Binance published a list of some of its wallets and holdings on Thursday. 

Cryptocurrency prices erased losses on Monday morning in London after Binance Holdings Ltd.'s Chief Executive Changpeng Zhao said his exchange plans to set up an industry recovery fund. Trading has been extremely volatile since FTX's unraveling began, erasing $244 billion of value since last Sunday, CoinGecko data shows.


Sam Bankman-Fried’s downfall sends shockwaves through crypto


THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

November 14, 2022 


Signage for the FTX Arena, where the Miami Heat basketball team plays, is visible on Nov. 12, 2022, in Miami. (AP Photo)

NEW YORK--Sam Bankman-Fried received numerous plaudits as he rapidly achieved superstar status as the head of cryptocurrency exchange FTX: the savior of crypto, the newest force in Democratic politics and potentially the world’s first trillionaire.

Now the comments about the 30-year-old Bankman-Fried aren’t so kind after FTX filed for bankruptcy protection Friday, leaving his investors and customers feeling duped and many others in the crypto world fearing the repercussions. Bankman-Fried himself could face civil or criminal charges.

“Sam what have you done?” tweeted Sean Ryan Evans, host of the cryptocurrency podcast Bankless, after the bankruptcy filing.

Under Bankman-Fried, FTX quickly grew to be the third-largest exchange by volume. The stunning collapse of this nascent empire has sent tsunami-like waves through the cryptocurrency industry, which has seen a fair share of volatility and turmoil this year, including a sharp decline in price for bitcoin and other digital assets. For some, the events are reminiscent of the domino-like failures of Wall Street firms during the 2008 financial crisis, particularly now that supposedly healthy firms like FTX are failing.

One venture capital fund wrote down investments in FTX worth over $200 million. The cryptocurrency lender BlockFi paused client withdrawals Friday after FTX sought bankruptcy protection. The Singapore-based exchange Crypto.com saw withdrawals increase this weekend for internal reasons but some of the action could be attributed to raw nerves from FTX.

Bankman-Fried and his company are under investigation by the Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission. The investigations likely center on the possibility that the firm may have used customers’ deposits to fund bets at Bankman-Fried’s hedge fund, Alameda Research, a violation of U.S. securities law.

“This is the direct result of a rogue actor breaking every single basic rule of fiscal responsibility,” said Patrick Hillman, chief strategy officer at Binance, FTX’s biggest competitor. Early last week Binance appeared ready to step in to bail out FTX but backed away after a review of FTX’s books.

The ultimate impact of FTX’s bankruptcy is uncertain, but its failure will likely result in the destruction of billions of dollars of wealth and even more skepticism for cryptocurrencies at a time when the industry could use a vote of confidence.

“I care because it’s retail investors who suffer the most, and because too many people still wrongly associate bitcoin with the scammy ‘crypto’ space,” said Cory Klippsten, CEO of Swan Bitcoin, who for months raised concerns about FTX’s business model. Klippsten is publicly enthusiastic about bitcoin but has long had deep skepticism about other parts of the crypto universe.

Bankman-Fried founded FTX in 2019, and it grew rapidly — it was recently valued at $32 billion. The son of Stanford University professors, who was known to play the video game “League of Legends” during meetings, Bankman-Fried attracted investments from the highest echelons of Silicon Valley.

Sequoia Capital, which invested in Apple, Cisco, Google, Airbnb and YouTube, described their meeting with Bankman-Fried as likely “talking to the world’s first trillionaire.” Several of Sequoia’s partners became enthusiastic about Bankman-Fried following a Zoom meeting in 2021. After several more meetings, Sequoia decided to invest in the company.

“I don’t know how I know, I just do. SBF is a winner,” wrote Adam Fisher, a business journalist who wrote a profile of Bankman-Fried for the firm, referring to Bankman-Fried by his popular online moniker. The article, published in late September, was removed from Sequoia’s website.

Sequoia has written down its $213 million in investments to zero. A pension fund in Ontario, Canada wrote down its investment to zero as well.

In a terse statement, the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Fund said, “Naturally, not all of the investments in this early-stage asset class perform to expectations.”

But up until last week, Bankman-Fried was seen as a white knight for the industry. Whenever the crypto industry had one of its crises, Bankman-Fried was the person likely to fly in with a rescue plan. When online trading platform Robinhood was in financial straits earlier this year--collateral damage from the decline in stock and crypto prices--Bankman-Fried jumped in to buy a stake in the company as a sign of support.

When Bankman-Fried bought up the assets of bankrupt crypto firm Voyager Digital for $1.4 billion this summer, it brought a sense of relief to Voyager account holders, whose assets has been frozen since its own failure. That rescue is now in question.

As king of crypto, his influence was starting to pour into political and popular culture. FTX bought prominent sports sponsorships with Formula Racing and bought the naming rights to an arena in Miami. He pledged to donate $1 billion toward Democrats this election cycle--his actual donations were in the tens of millions--and prominent politicians like Bill Clinton were invited to speak at FTX conferences. Football star Tom Brady invested in FTX.

Bankman-Fried had been the subject of some criticism before FTX collapsed. While he largely operated FTX out of U.S. jurisdiction from his headquarters in The Bahamas, Bankman-Fried was increasingly vocal about the need for more regulation of the cryptocurrency industry. Many supporters of crypto oppose government oversight. Now, FTX’s collapse may have helped make the case for stricter regulation.

One of those critics was Binance founder and CEO Changpeng Zhao. The feud between the two billionaires spilled out onto Twitter, where Zhao and Bankman-Fried collectively commanded millions of followers. Zhao helped kickstart the withdrawals that doomed FTX when he said Binance would sell its holdings in FTX’s crypto token FTT.

“What a s**t show ... and it’s going to be crypto’s fault (instead of one guys’s fault),” Zhao wrote on Twitter on Saturday.

FTX bankruptcy also endangers founder's philanthropic gifts

The rapid collapse of cryptocurrency exchange FTX into bankruptcy last week has also shaken the world of philanthropy, due to the donations and influence of FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried in the “effective altruism” movement

THALIA BEATY and GLENN GAMBOA 
Associated Press
November 14, 2022,

FILE - Signage for the FTX Arena, where the Miami Heat basketball team plays, is illuminated on Saturday, Nov. 12, 2022, in Miami. The rapid collapse of cryptocurrency exchange FTX into bankruptcy last week has also shaken the world of philanthropy, due...Show more
The Associated Press

NEW YORK -- The rapid collapse of cryptocurrency exchange FTX into bankruptcy last week has also shaken the world of philanthropy, due to the donations and influence of FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried in the “effective altruism” movement.

The FTX Foundation -- and other related nonprofits mostly funded by Bankman-Fried and other top FTX executives – says it has donated $190 million to numerous causes. Earlier this year, the foundation’s Future Fund announced plans to donate an additional $100 million, with hopes of donating up to $1 billion in 2022. Because of the bankruptcy, that won't be happening now.

And donations to numerous nonprofits, even those that have already received money from groups related to Bankman-Fried, are now in doubt.

FTX, the hedge fund Alameda Research, and dozens of other affiliated companies sought bankruptcy protection in Delaware Friday after the exchange experienced the crypto equivalent of a bank run. Customers tried to remove billions of dollars from the exchange after becoming concerned about whether FTX had sufficient capital.

Bankman-Fried has resigned from the company. His net worth, estimated earlier this year at $24 billion, has all but evaporated, according to Forbes and Bloomberg, which closely track the net worth of the world’s richest people.

On Thursday night, FTX Future Fund’s leadership team resigned, warning grantees that they were unlikely to pay out promised funds.

“We are devastated to say that it looks likely that there are many committed grants that the Future Fund will be unable to honor,” the team wrote in a joint post in the Effective Altruism Forum. “We are so sorry that it has come to this.”

ProPublica, the investigative journalism nonprofit, said it has been told by Building a Stronger Future, a foundation funded by Bankman-Fried, that the remaining two-thirds of its $5 million grant to report on pandemic preparedness and biothreats is now on hold.

ProPublica received one-third of the grant in February and expected one-third annually until 2024. The nonprofit said Building a Stronger Future is assessing its finances and that it was talking to other funders about taking on some of its grant portfolio.

“Regardless of what happens with the remainder of the grant, we are deeply committed to this important work and the team we have assembled to pursue it,” the nonprofit said in a statement. “We will use other resources to make sure that work continues.”

Bankman-Fried, 30, is the best-known proponent of the “effective altruism” social movement which believes in prioritizing donations to projects that will have the largest impact on the most number of people. Dustin Moskovitz, co-founder of Facebook and current Asana CEO and co-founder, and his wife Cari Tuna, are also major funders and backers of the movement, which also emphasizes that the lives of all people should be weighted equally, regardless of where they live now or if they will inhabit the earth generations in the future.

“I wanted to get rich, not because I like money but because I wanted to give that money to charity,” Bankman-Fried told an interviewer in a YouTube video called “ The Most Generous Billionaire,” published in January last year.

His ability to promote himself and FTX gave the exchange a higher profile than larger companies. FTX purchase the naming rights to the Miami Heat's home arena last year, though Miami-Dade County decided Friday to terminate its relationship with the company and rename the arena. It purchased a buzzed-about ad during this year's Super Bowl.

Bankman-Fried did set up a philanthropic infrastructure through his exchange, FTX, which promised that 1% of its crypto exchange fees would be donated to charities. It also matched user donations made through its platform up to $10,000 a day. In total, the company said more than $24 million was donated through user fees, donations and its matching program before it suspended its services.

Some “effective altruism” proponents advance the idea that making a lot of money is ethical as long as your goal is ultimately to give it away — sometimes shortened to “earning to give.” Bankman-Fried believed in this, signing The Giving Pledge in June as a promise that he would give away the majority of his wealth.

However, some now blame Bankman-Fried's “effective altruism” mindset for FTX’s troubles.

“Either ('effective altruism') encouraged Sam’s unethical behavior, or provided a convenient rationalization for such actions,” tweeted Moskovitz, who has also signed The Giving Pledge. “Either is bad.”

William MacAskill, a philosophy professor at Oxford University and a co-founder of the “effective altruism” movement, condemned Bankman-Fried for allegedly misusing customer funds.

“Sam and FTX had a lot of goodwill,” MacAskill, who was also an unpaid advisor to the FTX Future Fund, wrote in a thread on Twitter. “And some of that goodwill was the result of association with ideas I have spent my career promoting. If that goodwill laundered fraud, I am ashamed.”

MacAskill’s book, “What We Owe The Future,” prompted a wave of media coverage of the “effective altruism” movement this summer.

Requests for comment were sent to the largest grantees listed on the FTX Future Fund’s website, including other “effective altruism” advocates like the Long-Term Future Fund and the Centre for Effective Altruism and Longview.

In an interview with The Associated Press in May, Nick Beckstead, the CEO of FTX Foundation until he resigned Thursday, said there were about five people working at the foundation and that they were still working out how the various philanthropic projects started by Bankman-Fried would be structured.

“It’s a bit shoestring,” he said.

The community grew out of the work of philosophers at Oxford, including MacAskill, and debates of the merits of approaches and proposals on forums reflect the high-flying thinking of its origins.

Beckstead acknowledged the community can be “strange and intense,” but also that its emphasis on quantifying impact helps decide where to direct donations. Beckstead did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

“What is the cost per life saved or what is the cost per quality adjusted life year from this kind of activity?,” he previously said were some of the questions he likes to try to answer, drawing on input from subject matter experts.

—————

Associated Press coverage of philanthropy and nonprofits receives support through the AP’s collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. For all of AP’s philanthropy coverage, visit https://apnews.com/hub/philanthropy

Exclusive: An inside look at FTX's financials ahead of its bankruptcy filing

As FTX Trading Ltd. was filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the U.S. on Friday, investors were still reviewing the company’s private financial documents.

Those reviews follow a frenzied week of discussions between the company’s founder – and now former chief executive officer – Sam Bankman-Fried and potential investors in an attempt to save the cryptocurrency exchange business.

“FTX is raising roughly $6-10 billion of liquidity this week.  We are very open to structures here, and can be flexible,” one of the documents from an online data room reads.

FTX’s Chapter 11 filing said that approximately 130 affiliated companies have commenced voluntary proceedings. But the crisis has ensnared many others outside its immediate circle such as lender BlockFi, a troubled digital-asset lender once worth US$3 billion but which has now limited activity on its platform. The company paused client withdrawals late Thursday, citing “a lack of clarity” over the status of FTX US as well as the uncertainty afflicting FTX.com and sister trading house Alameda Research.

According to multiple sources who were in direct contact with Bankman-Fried in the past 24 hours, an inside look at FTX’s financial picture left them surprised, considering the once high flying cryptocurrency trading platform had been valued at US$25 billion last year.

“This data room was put together quickly,” said one source who had engaged with FTX in the past day. “There were some huge demands put on Sam.  He is under extreme stress.”

Some of that can be seen in the documents, which were obtained by BNN Bloomberg through multiple sources. 

“These are rough values, and could be slightly off,” one statement reads, in regards to the company’s balance sheet.  “There is also obviously a chance of typos, etc,” the Microsoft Excel spreadsheet authored by Bankman-Fried goes on to say.

The Excel document also includes another mea culpa from Bankman-Fried following an itemized breakdown of FTX’s financial assets and cryptocurrency holdings that show the company has nearly US$9 billion in liabilities and about US$900 million in liquid assets on its balance sheet.

“There were many things I wish I could do differently than I did, but the largest are represented by these two things: the poorly labeled internal bank-related acount (sic), and the size of customer withdrawals during a run on the bank,” according to the document.


Nov 11, 2022

Despite FTX crisis, it's not the end for the crypto sector, says industry insider


It's been a wild week in the crypto market following the collapse of exchange platform FTX, but an industry insider says that while the situation is probably one of the most unfortunate events in the history of the asset class, it's not the end for the sector.

Crypto prices sank dramatically after rival exchange platform Binance pulled out of a deal to purchase FTX earlier this week, citing significant concerns around reports of mishandled funds and regulatory investigations.

And on Friday, FTX filed for bankruptcy and CEO Sam Bankman-Fried stepped down.

FTX was valued earlier this year at US$32 billion.

Brian Mosoff, chief executive at Ether Capital, a Toronto-based firm that provides investors access to the cryptocurrency ethereum, said even though retail investors are on edge due to uncertainty around the worth of crypto assets, those that understand the technology that underpins cryptocurrencies -- blockchain -- likely believe that the sector still has potential.

"I don't think that people are thinking that the space goes away. I do think investors recognize that the sector is here to stay," he said "What it looks like and who the players are, those are different questions."

This year hasn't been particularly great for the crypto market in general, with the price of bitcoin tumbling significantly after reaching an all-time high of over US$68,000 in November of last year.

The digital asset industry saw nearly US$2 trillion in market value wiped out in the first few months of the year -- a staggering US$300 billion during the week of May 9 alone.

Bitcoin was trading at US$16,790.40 on Friday afternoon. The cryptocurrency is down more than 19 per cent over the past five days.

Mosoff said this year will wash out "a lot of the scam and hype assets" that came about in 2020 and 2021.

He said investors will likely become more conservative in their exposure to the space, choosing to hold just a little bit of bitcoin and a little bit of ether, the two most common crypto assets.

Mosoff added that the events of this year will force other crypto trading platforms to be more transparent.

It's not just your individual investors who have put money into crypto; major funds have also been taking a chance on the space.

In a statement released Thursday, the Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan said it invested US$95 million into both FTX International and the U.S. entity.

Teachers' said any financial loss on its investment in FTX will have limited impact on the pension plan because the investment represents less than 0.05 per cent of its total net assets.

The FTX incident highlights why regulatory oversight of the crypto industry is critical and reinforces the importance of clear regulation, Mosoff explained.

"I think this will be a marker where it's time now for the U.S. and Canada to clarify a lot of the regulatory rules to allow the businesses that want to be more compliant and more transparent to act in a responsible way," he said.

"The question is, what is an appropriate framework for regulation? Who are the appropriate players and the right level of transparency? Do investors want to use these third-party siloed, you know, custodians or exchanges to facilitate all their activities? Or does the space go back a little bit more to its roots?"

FTX hurtles toward bankruptcy with US$8B

hole, U.S. probe


The crisis engulfing Sam Bankman-Fried’s FTX.com is rapidly worsening, with the onetime crypto wunderkind warning of bankruptcy if his firm can’t secure funds to cover a shortfall of as much as US$8 billion.

Bankman-Fried informed investors of the gap on Wednesday, shortly before rival exchange Binance abruptly scrapped a takeover offer. He said FTX.com needed $4 billion to remain solvent and is attempting to raise rescue financing in the form of debt, equity, or a combination of the two, according to a person with direct knowledge of the matter.

“I f---ed up,” Bankman-Fried told investors on the call, according to people with knowledge of the conversation. He said he would be “incredibly, unbelievably grateful” if investors could help.

An FTX representative declined to comment.

The acknowledgment of his firm’s deepening troubles and limited options is a stunning turn for Bankman-Fried, who was once worth $26 billion and likened to John Pierpont Morgan. It also underscores the uncertainty hanging over FTX, its clients and cryptocurrency markets.

U.S. authorities are investigating FTX, the vast bulk of Bankman-Fried’s wealth has evaporated and rivals are benefiting from his woes. Robinhood Markets Inc. has seen its biggest crypto inflows ever in the last two days, Chief Executive Officer Vlad Tenev said Thursday. Binance and Coinbase Global Inc. have also seen large inflows, data from CryptoQuant show. 

Investor Sequoia Capital wrote down the full value of its holdings in FTX.com and FTX.us, an indication that the firm sees no clear path to recouping its investment.

BIG-NAME BACKERS

Hanging in the balance as the exchange teeters is not just the fate of its investors and lenders but anyone who has been unable to retrieve customer assets since it halted some withdrawals earlier in the week. The failure of crypto firms Celsius and Voyager saw billions in client money tied up in bankruptcy proceedings.

FTX has a prominent list of backers such as Sequoia Capital, BlackRock Inc., Tiger Global Management and SoftBank Group Corp. 

Still, Bankman-Fried remained defiant during a hectic period of roughly 24 hours that included mounting speculation that Binance wouldn’t go through with the deal. 

He repeatedly told investors during the conference call on Wednesday afternoon that it was simply not true that Changpeng Zhao was walking away from the takeover, the person said. 

About an hour later, Binance said it was indeed backing out.

“Our hope was to be able to support FTX’s customers to provide liquidity, but the issues are beyond our control or ability to help,” Binance, the crypto exchange founded by Zhao, said in a statement.

In addition to the financial strains, FTX is drawing attention from US authorities. 


The Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission are investigating whether the firm properly handled customer funds, as well as its relationship with other parts of Bankman-Fried’s crypto empire, including his trading house Alameda Research, Bloomberg News reported Wednesday. Officials from the Justice Department also are working with SEC attorneys, one of the people said. 

Zhao said in a memo earlier on Wednesday that there was no “master plan” to take over FTX, and that “user confidence is severely shaken.”

The renewed concern about contagion risk is showing up in the plunging prices of digital assets. Bitcoin fell below $16,000, the lowest in two years, after Binance’s announcement. 

Coinbase Chief Executive Officer Brian Armstrong said Tuesday in a Bloomberg TV interview that if the deal with Binance fell through, it would likely mean FTX customers would take losses.

“That’s a not a good thing for anybody,” he said.








SEE 

 

Sobeys data breach serves as wake-up call for industry: Expert

A recent data breach on Sobeys has revealed a larger issue in Canada's agri-food sector, an expert said. 

Sylvain Charlebois, a food researcher and professor at Dalhousie University in Halifax, said the industry has been particularly vulnerable to cyberattacks in recent weeks.

He said this most recent incident, which Sobeys has said is now resolved, is going to serve as a bit of a wake-up call for the country's agri-food sector because of the high-value, low-margin nature of the industry. 

"Stakes are so much higher for Sobeys because it is a front-facing company, they deal with customers so if there's a breach in their databases and some of the security is compromised, you have some personal data that is probably shared now," said Charlebois. 

"You can't miss a beat and hackers know that." 

Sobeys has only referred to the incident as a week of "IT system issues," and has yet to confirm it is was because of a cyberattack. 

However, on Thursday, two provincial privacy watchdogs said they had received data breach reports from Sobeys. Both Quebec's access to information commission and Alberta's privacy commission have both been notified by the grocer about a "confidentiality incident." 

Quebec's access to information commission said confidentiality incidents occur when there is unauthorized access, use or loss of personal information or any other breach of the protection of this information.

This is not the only confidentiality incident to recently happen to a Canadian agri-food company.

Over the weekend, Maple Leaf Foods Inc. was hit by a cybersecurity attack that impacted operations early into the week. 

An even larger cybersecurity attack was launched on meat supplier JBS and Alberta-based JBS Canada in 2021 that led to the company paying a ransom of US$11 million in Bitcoin. 

In October, the national supply chain task force released a final report recommending Canada’s cybersecurity strategy address the risks to transportation supply chains for critical commodities.

Issues at Empire-operated pharmacies, including Sobeys pharmacies and Lawtons Drugs, were first reported over the weekend, and some locations in Halifax Tuesday had signs posted warning customers of the ongoing technical problem. 

Sobeys spokeswoman Sarah Dawson said that Sobeys locations across the country are open and serving customers and that the pharmacy locations are once again fully operational while it works to replenish shelves.

At the federal level, the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada said it is in communication with the company to obtain more information and determine next steps.

Customers may find shelves understocked for the coming weeks as a result of the technical breach, said Charlebois.

Pssst: your employer is probably surveilling you

The COVID-19 pandemic ushered in an array of new employee-monitoring technologies that most workers haven't caught up with—from productivity software on phones and computers and GPS trackers to wearable technologies like construction helmets and tools that follow your social-media activity during work hours.

Some are obvious. Even bosses with little tech savvy can get a snapshot of your day by tracking your use of programs like Zoom, Slack, Google Workspace and Microsoft Office, plus logins to corporate terminals.

Ifeoma Ajunwa, an associate professor at UNC School of Law and author of the upcoming  The Quantified Worker: Law and Technology in the Modern Workplace (Cambridge University Press, March 2023), discusses this growing workplace surveillance. Her responses were condensed and edited.

How can employees find out the extent to which they're being surveilled?

They can't. They could ask directly, and the employer could decide to share, but there is no sure way to know, because there's no federal law that requires your employer to tell you. It does depend on the state. In California, there are rules that require your employer to tell you exactly how they surveil you.

So most people should just assume they're being surveilled?

Yes. Know that emails and any communication in the workplace can be surveilled, as well as corporate accounts. And you wouldn't necessarily expect that things in your home will be surveilled, but if you bring your work devices home, like vehicles, computers or phones, you should know that those usually can have GPS-enabled tracking capabilities.

What exactly is the point of tracking knowledge workers, especially if they're generally productive?

This is really about an ideology: that employees need to be held sort of accountable and captive for the hours that the employer thinks is necessary to get the job done. So it's really about an ideology rather than an objective.

There's no U.S. law limiting extreme surveillance?

I testified before Congress urging legislative action in February 2020, but unfortunately I don't really see the political will right now. I really hope that people will realize that this is a nonpartisan issue.

If surveillance is so common, how come we rarely see workers fired because they went to Krispy Kreme?

People are definitely getting fired, but you may not read about it because people sign something called a Notice of Consequence, where the employer says, “Oh, you will be surveilled” without necessarily telling exactly how. It is used as the premise for firing.

Can you give an example?

There was a case in California about a female junior executive who had been obligated to download an app that tracks your location. She later discovered that she could never actually turn the app off—she would turn it off after work hours, but it was still on. She learned this because her supervisor was telling her what she had done over the weekend and how fast she had been driving. California is one of the states that has passed a law curtailing how far employers can go.

Is monitoring always a bad thing for employees?

It depends how the employer deploys it. If the supervisor has discriminatory intent, it's a tool that can be wielded in various discriminatory ways. When everyone is surveilled, it doesn't mean that everyone is surveilled equally.

Are there any potential upsides to being surveilled?

You don't have a literal supervisor looking over your shoulder. That might actually be a relief for employees more vulnerable to discrimination on the basis of identities like race or sexual orientation. They can just focus on work and not do all the other shadow or emotional work to “fit in” at work.

Why did you call your book The Quantified Worker?

We've always had worker surveillance, from the Roman Empire to the Industrial Revolution. We kind of needed a way to keep track of everyone and what they're supposed to be doing. But now technologies allow workers to be surveilled to a much greater extent than ever previously imagined, and as a result we're heading toward quantifying workers.

What do you mean by that?

We're treating workers not as whole human beings, but as the amount of work they can provide, and the quantity of risk that they represent—you know, the employer pays for their health insurance. That's a big change in the relationship between employers and employees.

What happens when employees are over-monitored?

Several studies show that it makes workers more inefficient and discourages creativity. When people are doing their jobs, they quickly figure out the best and quickest ways of doing things—you actually want that. Over-monitored workers are worried about deviating. And, of course, research shows that creativity happens when you have some downtime. Monitoring encourages busy work.

What's the biggest misconception that most people have about surveillance?

We have the impression that there's a huge gulf between how white and blue collar workers are managed and monitored, but there really is not. White collar workers used to have more freedom in terms of autonomy, but with monitoring, everyone is being surveilled.

Hourly wages needed to live in Ontario rise as inflation PRICE GOUGING persists

Hourly wages needed to live in Ontario have increased amid decades-high inflation and remain well above the province's minimum wage, according to a new report.

In the report released Monday, the Ontario Living Wage Network said the living wage in Toronto is now $23.15 an hour, up almost five per cent from $22.08 a year earlier.

The report said the largest increase was in Sault Ste. Marie, where the living wage went up by 21.6 per cent since last year.

Minimum wage in Ontario is $15.50 an hour.

The organization's living wage calculation uses the basic costs of living, such as housing, food, clothing and transportation, as well as factors like government benefits, to determine how much a worker needs to make hourly in order to live in their region.

PRICE GOUGING

Canada's annual inflation rate was 6.9 per cent in September, but the cost of groceries continues to climb. It has been steadily declining since reaching its highest rate this year of 8.1 per cent in June. Statistics Canada is expected to release October's data on Wednesday.

"This year's living wage calculations emerge from a backdrop of record--breaking inflation," the report said.

The living wage calculations are updated annually and released in November.

According to the organization, this year for the first time their living wage calculations cover the entire province of Ontario, offering living wages for 10 economic regions defined by Statistics Canada.

Toronto's living wage is the highest of all the regions, most of which have a living wage between $19 and $20.

Food is one of the highest costs in the calculator, the organization said, and it's gone up significantly this year with inflation.

"The rise in food prices across our province have added significantly to the increase in living wage rates for all communities," the report said.

There are now more than 500 employers that are certified with the Living Wage Network, meaning they agree to pay their employees the regional living wage calculated by the organization.

The Living Wage Network said more than half of those companies signed up since the pandemic began.

Slowdown will impact low-income earners most, Macklem says

Low-income Canadians are the hardest hit by high inflation and will be disproportionately affected by the impending economic slowdown, Bank of Canada governor Tiff Macklem said during a speech Monday. 

While delivering opening remarks at a central bank conference on diversity, equity and inclusion, Macklem noted that high inflation has harmful and uneven impacts.

"High inflation affects everyone, but lower-income households feel the burden of high inflation the most," the governor said. "Lower-income Canadians will also be disproportionately affected by the slowdown."

He said the swift pace of the recovery and rebound in employment were mitigating factors for those most affected by the pandemic -- low-income Canadians, youth and women. 

"We are still learning about the longer-term effects of the pandemic, but the scarring we were worried about wasn’t as pervasive as we had feared," he said. "Economic growth came roaring back quickly, and workers did not remain on the sidelines for long."

The governor said there is "no easy out" to restore price stability but that the ultimate outcome of raising interest rates will be better for all Canadians.

The Bank of Canada has aggressively raised interest rates this year in response to inflation reaching highs not seen in nearly four decades. Since March, the central bank has raised its key interest rate six consecutive times, bringing it from 0.25 per cent to 3.75 per cent. 

Higher interest rates are expected to cool the economy significantly, with a risk that the rapid rate hiking may push the economy into a recession. 

Labour groups have been vocal about the Bank of Canada's efforts to clamp down on inflation, raising concerns about what the slowdown will mean for workers. 

The governor has previously said unemployment will rise as the economy cools but that its not expected to reach high levels by historical standards. 

While not substitutes to higher interest rates, Macklem said increasing supply in the economy will help ease inflation, adding that the more that can be done to help supply grow the less demand will need to be suppressed. 

Macklem also spoke about the inequities in the economics discipline.

Speaking to the theme of the conference, Macklem said economics is having a "Me Too" reckoning and acknowledged women in the field have to face the added burden of harassment.

He said he has worked to create a culture of respect at the Bank of Canada and acknowledged his female colleagues have faced harassment he has never had to face.

"Let me be clear. Harassment of any kind can never be ignored, or excused, or brushed away.

China Key to Australia’s Green Superpower Ambitions: Garnaut Q&A

(Bloomberg) -- Australia’s biggest opportunity in a net-zero economy would be to convert iron ore into green steel using hydrogen and then export it to China, according to Ross Garnaut, a professor of economics, former government adviser and ex-ambassador to Beijing.

In his latest book -- the Superpower Transformation -- Garnaut argues that shifting Chinese imports to zero-carbon steel would help lower the costs of decarbonization in the world’s second-largest economy, while adding immensely to Australia’s industrial development. 

The Asian giant produces and uses more than half the world’s iron and steel, most processed from Australian ores. In a green world, this would be done most efficiently via hydrogen, said Garnaut, who has authored several climate change reviews.

Generating sufficient zero-emissions electricity “will be a large challenge in China,” he said in an interview. “Realization of this great potential for both China and Australia would require the restoration of cooperative and productive trade relations.”

The following transcript has been edited for length and clarity.

You talk about China-Australia relations in the book. How critical is a resumption of healthy trade ties between the two countries for Australia’s zero-carbon future?

A high proportion of the trade opportunities in the zero-carbon world for Australia will be in China, just as a high proportion of the economic and trade opportunities in the high-carbon world are with China at the moment. And so it’s very much in the interests of both Australia and China that over time, we establish the foundations for large scale, stable and confident trade in the products of zero-carbon economy just as we did for the high-carbon economy.

Would an economic slowdown or a global recession slow Australia’s transition?

For Australia it will underline the importance of going more quickly and using these new investment opportunities.

The war in Ukraine has raised recognition that the world’s reliance on imported fossil energy is very insecure. And that one way of improving energy security is to rely more on renewable energy, a proportion of which can be obtained from countries like Australia in one form or another.

How high is your confidence in Australia’s ability to transform into a zero-carbon superpower?

I’m very confident about the nature of Australia’s advantages and the extent of the opportunity. Given our history, and the mess we’ve made of energy and climate policy over the last seven or eight years, one has to have doubts about whether we can put in place a stable policy environment. However, those doubts have to recognize that the new government has made a good start on these issues with revision of a lot of the policies that stood in the way of Australia using its opportunity. Overall, I’d say my confidence level is reasonably high.

Is the notion of Australia as a clean-energy superpower just something from academic circles or are we seeing actual investments and things moving on the ground?

It’s begun to move into the industrial regions of Australia. We already are seeing some investments of the kind that we will see as we build the super power. These include the sun cable project in the Northern Territory to export power by cable to Singapore. There are also a number of places in Australia with early development of hydrogen projects. These are early steps, very first steps. So it’s certainly moved into the executive floors of companies and into the boardrooms.

Do you see Australia ruling the world in clean energy?

No, we won’t rule the world. But we’ll be a very important player in the world. We won’t be the sole superpower. We will probably be the largest exporter of zero-emissions industrial inputs, just as now we are the world’s biggest exporter of iron ore, aluminum ores, LNG and coal. The nature of the exports will change and our position will be an even stronger one in the industrial inputs of the new economy than it was in the old carbon economy.

How does the world benefit from Australia’s energy transition?

Australia’s use of zero emissions inputs in energy and biomass could lead to us directly removing about 8% of the world’s carbon emissions. In addition, we’ll be the source of much more than 80% of the energy transition minerals that are needed in very large quantities.

From a policy perspective, what changes are needed in Australia?

I think what’s been announced is a good start, but it’s only a start. And we have to go much further. I think the government understands that. The detailed statement about the extra steps I’ve set that out in my book. There’s a lot of steps we still have to do. But the new government has got us started.

©2022 Bloomberg L.P.

TO BE FOREVER KNOWN AS THE PREZ WHO WAS MELANIA'S LAWYER

Natasa Pirc Musar, Melania Trump’s ex-lawyer, elected Slovenia's first female president

The United States's former first lady, Melania Trump's lawyer, Natasa Pirc Musar, was elected as Slovenia's first female president on Sunday.


India Today Web Desk
New Delhi,
UPDATED: Nov 14, 2022 

Natasa Pric Musar (54), who ran independently, was backed by 
Slovenia’s centre-left government. (Photo: Reuters)

By India Today Web Desk: Natasa Pirc Musar, a lawyer of US’s former first lady Melania Trump, is set to become Slovenia’s first female president after defeating the country’s former Foreign Minister, Anze Loger - an ally of former Prime Minister Janez Jnza.

Musar defeated Loger in a runoff vote on Sunday by securing 54 per cent of the vote, which was eight per cent more votes received by the latter.

According to the country’s election commission, out of 49.9 per cent of people who had voted in the election - 54 per cent voted for Musar, while 46% voted for Loger.

The 54-year-old leader, who ran independently, was backed by Slovenia’s centre-left government.

"Slovenia has elected a president who believes in the European Union, in the democratic values on which the EU was founded," Pirc Musar was quoted as saying by the BBC after her victory

"Young people are now putting the responsibility on our political shoulders to take care of our planet so that our next generation, our children, will live in a healthy and clean environment," she remarked.

STINT AS MELANIA TRUMP'S LAWYER

Pirc Musar served as Melania Trump's lawyer when she slapped a tabloid with a defamation case. She was also part of the team hired to protect Melania Trump’s trademark interests.

Musar is also accused of alleviating her husband’s business empire through tax havens, which she used to build wealth. However, she refuted the accusations against her, saying all the companies owned by her and her husband were legitimate and all taxes were being paid in Slovenia.

(With input from Bloomberg and BBC)
Tunisia's first floating solar station starts to operate

FETHI BELAID/AFP 
By Africanews 

VIDEO https://www.africanews.com/embed/2124038

In Tunisia, the first floating solar station on a lake next to a Tunis industrial park has started to operate.

The expectation is that the 200-kilowatt project from a French renewables company, Qair, can be a prototype for bigger projects nationwide.

"When we started at the time, it was the first project in Africa for a floating solar power plant, i.e. in the water. The originality of this project means we can use water instead of taking up land that can be used for other things like farming or homes", said Omar Bey, executive for the French-based renewables group Qair.

Using floating solar panels helps to conserve water resources whilst making the panels more energy efficient.

"Floating solar panels first of all allow the reduction of water evaporation when they are installed on a water body. So this evaporation of water in countries like Tunisia, Which is water-stressed, certainly allows the dams to keep more water reserves", concluded the executive.

In 2015 Tunisia set ambitious targets for renewables but last year green sources accounted for only 2.8 percent of the country's energy mix and the rest came from natural gas.

"We're blessed with a lot of sunshine in Tunisia, and it's not like in other places such as the Gulf, the solar panels have the characteristics and the sunshine is good, and we can exploit it, so why not let everyone put up solar panels? The field is developing and will keep on doing so", said Hassen Amiri, manager of Sater Solar energy company.

Tunisia's neighbour, Morocco, is leading in the region. The country currently produces around a fifth of its electricity from clean sources.


Israel’s Religious Terrorists

 
NOVEMBER 14, 2022
Facebook

The Threat to Human Rights

No one should be surprised to find Benjamin Netanyahu back as prime minister of Israel, with decisive support from far-right religious extremists. With the recent election, the religious bloc called Religious Zionism put Netanyahu’s Likud party comfortably over the top in the Knesset and now, as a leading member of the governing coalition, it is strongly positioned to pursue its volatile agenda aimed at reclaiming Israel as a Jewish state.

Among things that might follow, based on their leaders’ public statements, are the deportation of “disloyal” Palestinian citizens, legal challenges to Palestinian-owned buildings in the West Bank, restrictions on access to Al-Aqsa–the Temple Mount in Jerusalem sacred to both Jews and Palestinians–and massive changes in Israel’s legal system pertaining to the selection of judges and the authority of the Supreme Court to overrule laws on constitutional grounds.

This is obviously a very troubling development for US policymakers and more generally, for human rights advocates everywhere. Regrettably, the initial US response, which came from the State Department’s spokesman, avoided direct comment on the extremists’ takeover:

“We hope that all Israeli government officials will continue to share the values of an open, democratic society including tolerance and respect for all in civil society, particularly for minority groups. You’ve heard us speak to the commitment we have to a future two-state solution and to equal measures of security, freedom, justice and prosperity for Israelis and Palestinians alike.”

Two years ago, Lehava, the virulent Israeli citizen’s group at the epicenter of armed attacks, race-mongering, and incitement of terror against Palestinians, was inextricably bound-up and politically enabled by Otzma Yehudit (translated as “Jewish Power”), an extremist right-wing political party that became a key player within Benjamin Netanyahu’s governing coalition. Otzma represents one of the factional players Netanyahu needed most to assure his political survival and as important, to support a vote in the Knesset that would effectively eliminate pending legal charges against him in his trial on charges of breach of public trust and corruption.

US Policy Options

The voters of Israel have now spoken and the Netanyahu government and Knesset will predictably veer to the extreme right at least for the immediate future.

Senator Robert Menendez, chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and one of Israel’s most ardent and important political supporters, had reportedly warned Netanyahu about the adverse consequences for congressional support of bringing the extremist Religious Zionism bloc into the government. His candid pre-election cautions apparently evoked the ire of Netanyahu (“pissed him off”) but they doubtless hit the mark.

Menendez’s comments also resonated with Khaled Elgindy, a senior fellow at Washington’s Middle East Institute, who wrote in Foreign Policy magazine:

“The most important thing Washington could do would be to stop giving Israeli leaders a pass. Washington’s reluctance to hold Israel accountable for any excesses—whether in terms of human rights abuses against Palestinians, continued settlement expansion, home demolitions, evictions, or other violations—while continuing to shield Israel from the costs and consequences of its own actions in the international arena has fueled the sense of impunity and triumphalism of Israeli leaders and the far-right extremists they have empowered.”

When these far-right groups first appeared in Netanyahu’s governing coalition, the newly formed Biden administration was besieged with increasing fervor by voices on all sides of the unfolding tragedy.

At that time we argued that the President could take an executive action to undermine Israeli extremism without the risk of fracturing his base or reputation at home or around the world. He could ask the State Department to consider whether Lehava and Otzma Yehudit should be added to the State Department’s Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) list. It had been widely reported, both in Israel and the United States, that these organizations and their leaders had received support from US donors through a cryptic network of religious and service organizations designed to provide cover as charitable institutions.

T’ruah, a leading American human rights organization representing two thousand rabbis and cantors, filed a series of official complaints with the IRS documenting the abuse of the US tax laws for so-called “charitable contributions” that ultimately went to support Lehava and Otzma.

Although Biden knows far better than to be seen meddling directly in another government’s internal politics, putting an Israeli political organization on a US-sponsored list geared to eliminating a tax exemption for the support of terrorist activity could be highly influential and well within the bounds of propriety. There is historic precedent for doing so. The legislation authorizing that move in 1996 was drafted by Ron Klain, then a lawyer serving in the Department of Justice, with support from then-Senator Biden. The President should consider taking this action now.

While it is far from clear precisely how US policymakers will express their opposition to Israeli extremism—whether indirectly, through the FTO list as we have suggested, or more directly through diplomatic or legislative means—most important is that the US government deter terrorism sponsored by entities close to the heart of the incoming Israeli government.

Those who rightly decry Palestinian terrorism need to take a hard look at what Israelis have just voted in—a coalition that has prominent advocates of violence against innocent Arab citizens. Doing so would give substance to US support of human rights, not only in Israel but in the Middle East generally.

“Subpoenas” Served on U.S. Weapons


Manufacturers


 
NOVEMBER 14, 2022Facebook

What is it like to be so ashamed of the company for whom you work that you cannot bring yourself to admit you work there? Ashamed of the products they manufacture, the innocent people those products kill, the hundreds of billions of dollars of public taxpayer money squandered in a gluttonous pursuit of profits?

This is life as seen on November 10th, 2022, at Raytheon Technologies in Arlington, VA. Members and supporters of the Merchants of Death War Crimes Tribunal, a public tribunal, served “subpoenas” on four United States weapons manufacturers charging them with War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity, Theft, and Bribery.

The other three corporations served that same day were Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and General Atomics. These four corporations are representative of the modern-day piracy that is the U.S. war industry, a corporate capture of U.S. foreign policy, the Congress, the Departments of Defense and State, and the U.S. economic system.

Raytheon Technologies occupies a towering office building in Arlington, a stone’s throw from the Pentagon and Arlington National Cemetery, two sites commemorating death and the utter failure of war. Though the Raytheon building has its corporate logo plastered in blood-red letters at the top, once inside no sign exists evidencing this corporate war profiteer. No name, no logo, no receptionist. A sad attempt to hide their dealings in the black art of war.

When asked, security guards refused to acknowledge Raytheon was in the building. Of the dozens of employees who passed, none would admit they worked at Raytheon, averting their eyes as they hurried away. When police arrived to escort the Tribunal members and supporters off premises, the police would not acknowledge Raytheon was headquartered there. Just like the employees, they had their orders. Keep quiet, admit nothing.

It was silent as a tomb except for the voices of the Tribunal members speaking the truth about the trail of suffering and death Raytheon and its corporate brethren have left across Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria, Somalia, and the Palestinian Occupied Territory. Meanwhile, these Merchants of Death have left the United States financially, morally, and spiritually bankrupt.

Raytheon Technologies has a market capitalization of $96 billion. According to Macrotrends, Raytheon Technologies revenue for the quarter ending September 30, 2022 was $16.951B, a 4.55% increase year-over-year. For 2021 it was $64.388B, a 13.79% increase from 2020, for 2020 was $56.587B, a 24.78% increase from 2019, and for 2019 was $45.349B, a 30.68% increase from 2018. In four years, they have garnered almost a 70% increase in revenue. Marketing death is good for profits if you can live with yourself. Apparently, given their silence, many Raytheon employees struggle with this very issue.

Raytheon builds some of the most destabilizing, destructive, and expensive weapons on earth. The Hypersonic Missile which travels in excess of five times the speed of sound — Mach 5 — covering vast distances in minutes. It is “hard to stop and flies nimbly to avoid detection and dodge defensive countermeasures.” All these are attributes which make the missile so destabilizing to a foreign leader who has only minutes to determine whether they are being attacked with a nuclear weapon.

Raytheon makes the Peregrine Air-to-Air Missile which they claim “increases firepower, penetrates bad weather, and goes the distance.” Add to that their plans to use “high power microwaves” in war and we see the epitome of a Merchant of Death.

Boeing, General Atomics, and Lockheed Martin are the same. They too revel in blood money as they build for war and drain the U.S. economy. In fact, some $8 trillion in U.S. taxpayer money has been given to U.S. defense contractors over the last twenty years.

The U.S. War Industry plays a key role in fomenting war with their congressional lobbying, not just pushing for weapons contracts but influencing military strategy, thereby exacerbating and prolonging the anguish of civilians bearing the brunt of these wars of choice. On the issue of war in particular, Congress must be answerable to its citizens, not a handful of corporations.

With their silence on November 10, these weapons manufacturers revealed their shame. Their corporate mission statement is “War Begets Profit.”  For the Merchants of Death War Crimes Tribunal, the mission statement is “Come War Profiteers, Give Account.”  Stand before a Tribunal and be judged.

And so, what is it like to give your talents to a corporation which hides its very existence, to give all your efforts and education and experience in the creation of weapons which kill indiscriminately? Their loss of words, their averting eyes, the damning silence offered in their corporate crypt, is the devastating answer.

Brad Wolf is a former prosecutor, professor, and college dean.  He is the Executive Director of Peace Action Network of Lancaster and writes for numerous publications.