Monday, March 11, 2024

Bees Reveal a Human-Like Collective Intelligence We Never Knew Existed

NATURE

The humble bumblebee is proof that brain size isn't everything.

This little insect with its wee, seed-sized brain has shown a level of collective intelligence in experiments that scientists thought was wholly unique to humans.

When trained in the lab to open a two-step puzzle box, bumblebees of the species Bombus terrestris could teach the solution to another bee that had never seen the box before.

This naive bee would not have solved the puzzle on its own. To teach the 'demonstrator' bees the non-intuitive solution in the first place, researchers had to show them what to do and offer them a reward after the first step to keep them motivated.

"This finding challenges a common opinion in the field: that the capacity to socially learn behaviors that cannot be innovated through individual trial and error is unique to humans," write the team of researchers based in the United Kingdom and United States.

Humans have a long history of 'moving the goalposts' on what sets our species apart from all others.

Once, it was thought that humans were the only animals with culture. But 'viral' songs among sparrowsthe evolving dialects and traditions of whales, the regional hunting strategies of orcas, and the learned tool tricks of apes, crows, and dolphins, all suggest that socially transmitted behaviors are also present in animal societies, too.

Some of these cultural behaviors even show signs of refinement and improvement over time. Homing pigeons, for instance, learn from each other and adjust their culture's flight paths year on year.

An influential way to move the goalposts on human intelligence is to say that humans are unique from other animals because we can learn things from each other that we could not invent independently.

Think of the device you are reading this article on right now. No one human can invent all its parts and mechanics from scratch on their own and in one lifetime. It's taken decades of work and refinement to get to this advanced stage. Even the very act of reading is a skill that generations of humans have built upon little by little.

Obviously, no animal can put together an iPhone or read an article on animal intelligence. But at a basic level, bumblebees join chimpanzees in "cast[ing] serious doubt on this supposed human exceptionalism," writes Alex Thornton, an ecologist at the University of Exeter, in a review of the bumblebee research for Nature.

Chimpanzees have large brains and rich cultural lives, but the discovery among bumblebees, Thornton argues, is "all the more remarkable because it focuses not on humanity's primate cousins, but on… an animal with a brain that is barely 0.0005 percent of the size of a chimpanzee's."

Underestimated for decades, largely because of their size, bumblebees are finally getting their due.

Recent experiments in the lab show these bees can learn from each otheruse toolscount to zero, and perform basic mathematical equations.

The collective intelligence of their hive mind is also not to be dismissed.

To test it, behavioral scientist Alice Bridges from Queen Mary University of London and colleagues housed colonies of bumblebees with a two-step puzzle for a total of 36 or 72 hours over 12 or 24 consecutive days, with no human help.

After all that time, the bees could not figure out how to get to the sugary reward. Bumblebees spend on average about 8 days foraging in their lifetimes, so it's as if they had up to a third of their lifetime foraging time to work on the puzzle.

In the image below, you can see the puzzle. The yellow circle contains a drop of sugar under a plastic lid. Bees can get to it by pushing the red tab, but only once the blue tab has been pushed out of the way.

The two-step puzzle box with a bee pushing the red tab. (Queen Mary University of London)

It took a human to painstakingly show them the way, and this was only possible using an extra reward. But once one bee figured it out, they could teach others how to move the two tabs to retrieve a sugary treat.

A similar experiment on chimps was also published recently in Nature Human Behavior. Both the vertebrate and invertebrate case studies showed a sharing of ideas that were exceptionally hard to learn alone.

Of course, this behavior wasn't observed in the wild. It had to be taught to the bees and chimps first. But the findings leave open the possibility that if there were a rare, once-in-a-lifetime innovator in chimp or bee society – an Einstein among bees – their ideas might stick around in animal culture and be used for generations to come.

Bees' famous honey waggle dance, pointing out the distance, direction, and quality of sources of food, for instance, is a behavior that was once thought to be purely instinctive, but it now appears to be somewhat shaped by social influences.

In 2017, researchers also trained bumblebees to roll a ball into a goal for a reward. To score, the insects had to learn from each other and remedy their previous mistakes. And so they did.

The newest experiment, Thornton writes, "suggests that the ability to learn from others what cannot be learnt alone should now join tool use, episodic memory (the ability to recall specific past events) and intentional communication in the scrapheap" of explanations for human cognition and culture.

The study was published in Nature.


BEES ARE SYMBOLS OF THE AEON OF MAAT

 SEE Liber Pennae Praenumbra - Wikisource, the free online library


Why do bees have queens? 2 biologists

explain this insect’s social structure – and

why some bees don’t have a queen at all


The queen, on the right with a larger, darker body, is bigger than the worker bees in the colony and lives several times longer. Jens Kalaene/picture alliance via Getty Images


THE CONVERSATION
Published: March 4, 2024 

Authors
Phil Starks
Associate Professor of Biology, Tufts University
Aviva Liebert
Professor of Biology, Framingham State University


Curious Kids is a series for children of all ages. If you have a question you’d like an expert to answer, send it to curiouskidsus@theconversation.com.


Why do bees have queens? – Rhylie, age 8, Rosburg, Washington


When you think “bee,” you likely picture one species that lives all over the world: the honey bee. And honey bees have queens, a female who lays essentially all of the eggs for the colony.

But most bees don’t have queens. With about 20,000 species of bees worldwide – that’s about 2 trillion bees – the majority of them don’t even live in groups. They do just fine without queens or colonies.

Instead, a single female lays eggs in a simple nest, either inside a plant stem or an underground tunnel. She provides each egg with a ball of pollen mixed with nectar that she collected from flowers, and she leaves the eggs to hatch and develop on their own. She doesn’t have anyone to help with this process.


These bee species, often spectacularly beautiful, are important pollinators of many crops and plants, though most people aren’t even aware of them.

Since lots of bees successfully live without a queen, what is it that queens provide for the bee species that do have them? We are behavioral ecologists who study social insects, and this question is at the heart of our research

.
A bee colony may have many thousands of workers who support the single queen.

A queen, workers and drones


Along with honey bees, two other kinds of bees also have queens: bumble bees, which are found on all continents except Australia and Antarctica, and stingless bees, which are found primarily in tropical areas.

One honey bee colony – also called a hive – may have more than 50,000 bees, while bumble bee colonies usually have just a few hundred bees. Stingless bee colonies are often small, but some are as large as the biggest honey bee hives.

These bees’ social structures have two more things in common besides the egg-laying queen: the female workers who care for the colony, and the males, sometimes called “drones.”

Notice the males are not included in the “worker” group. Males generally don’t help collect nectar or pollen, protect and maintain the hive, or care for the young larvae. The females do all of those jobs.

Instead, the males have one task: to find and then mate with a female who may become a future queen. After building their strength, males leave the hive to join thousands of other drones to wait for new queens that are also looking for mates. If males are lucky enough to mate, they die soon afterward. In contrast, females typically mate with many different males before starting their lives as egg-laying queens.

Female worker bees do pretty much all the work.

The isolated queen

Maybe you imagine a queen as the one in charge, ordering everyone around. But that’s a case of language being misleading. Unlike human queens who lead their people, bee queens don’t rule over their workers.

Instead, particularly for honey bees, the queen is rather isolated from what’s happening in the hive. Remember, she just lays eggs, up to 2,000 in a day. The workers surround and take care of her while managing the colony. The queen bee might live for a few years, much longer than female worker bees and drones.

Other animals also live in social groups with a division of labor between those who reproduce and those who maintain the colony. Antstermites and some wasps – like yellow jackets and hornets – have a similar kind of colony structure. So does the naked mole rat. Why did these groups evolve to have queens?

Family ties


One way for an organism to pass on genes is by having offspring.

Another way is to help close relatives, who are likely to share many of your same genes, to produce more offspring than they would if they were on their own.


Honey bee eggs and larvae develop one to a cell.
  Megan Kobe/iStock via Getty Images Plus

This option is pretty much what happens in a bee colony. Those thousands of female worker bees may not themselves reproduce, but the queen is their mother. They help her produce another generation of siblings who will one day be their sisters. In this way, the female worker bees are passing their genes on to the next generation, just not directly.

Something else to consider: A honey bee hive is a wonderfully complex structure. The layers of wax combs built to store honey and raise offspring are a marvel of architecture and require a large workforce for construction, ongoing repairs and protection from intruders or predators.

So you might ask: Which came first? Social groups with queens and workers producing large numbers of related offspring that required more elaborate nest structures? Or did the complex nest arise first, which led to greater success for groups that evolved to divide tasks among queens and workers?

These are fascinating questions that biologists have been exploring for decades. But both of these factors – the division of labor and the complex hive structures – help explain why there are bees with queens.


Kollontai – Love of worker bees

AlexandraKollontai

Alexandra Kollontai was a Russian revolutionary who wrote about the liberation of women and the need for any kind of socialist revolution to deal with the inequalities existing between men and women before it could be truly

Love of worker bees is her novel which expands on some of these ideas, being built on the conflict between a (common-law) husband and wife when the husband, Volodya, is still tied to bourgeois notions of marriage while his wife, Vasya, is convinced that the new politics of post-revolutionary Russia must be reflected in new social and personal relations. Volodya becomes a director of a large factory, and starts to expect Vasya to take on the bourgeois role of ‘director’s wife’ – to stay at home and keep the house nice (with the help of a servant), leaving behind her previous work in the Party, and the communal house she has devoted herself to organsing. She finds this constricting, and when her husband’s workers come to the house to complain about working conditions enthusiastically throws herself back into the role of Bolshevik trade unionist, helping them find ways to fight the boss.

Volodya sees this as a betrayal; but betrays Vasya in turn by keeping up an affair with a beautiful, non-political woman, Nina. Vasya, sincerely committed to a new politics of sexual engagement, is less troubled by the affair than by Volodya’s failure to tell her the truth about it. The psychological reality of the novel is in Vasya’s inability to make a clean break with Volodya: she is sensible enough to realise that the life he offers is not for her, but her passionate sexual desire for him makes her dither and delay, breaking things off only to be overwhelmed by his declarations of love; convincing herself again and again that he is not lying to her, that he has truly broken off his affair. But in the end her redemption is to walk away from her marriage to Volodya and return alone but pregnant to her communal house. Here she intends to make a life more in keeping with her communalist, progressive ideas:

‘But how are you going to raise a child all on your own?’ [asks her friend Grusha]

‘What do you mean, all on my own? Everything will be arranged perfectly, and we’ll set up a crêche. In fact I thought of asking you to help run the crêche. I know how you love children. And soon there’ll be a new baby, for all of us!’

‘A communist baby!’

‘Precisely so!’ They both laughed.

Sheila Rowbotham, who writes the afterword to my copy, suggests in Women, resistance and revolution that Love of worker bees fails to solve the problem it expresses so beautifully:

‘…Vasilisa’s choice simply ignores the basic causes of tension. She goes away and is able to rid herself of her jealousy of Nina and the traditional feminine […] She finds her identity thus only by denying the existence of the man and her own sexuality. The only solution possible is no real solution.’

But this is a misreading of the source of conflict: Vasya’s problem in Love of worker bees is not one of sexual jealousy of the other woman, but of separating her own desires and needs as an individual (for freedom, independence, her work, the ability to live how she likes) from her sexual desire for Volodya. Furthermore, Vasya doesn’t rule out sexuality forever: all she decides is that her passion for Volodya is spent, since they no longer share the friendship and trust she needs in a relatio

Nonetheless it’s true that the ending with its sunny communist optimism is not as psychologically subtle as the depiction of Vasya’s struggle to detach herself from Volodya. But Kollontai’s ideas about the need for new forms of personal life to follow new political structures are important, and Love of worker bees expresses them beautifully.


The Love of Worker Bees in Historical Context


Amid protest, Oregon Board of Forestry approves controversial Habitat Conservation Plan

Zach Urness
Salem Statesman Journal

The Oregon Board of Forestry voted Thursday to move forward with a controversial plan that would scale back logging on 640,000 acres of state forests while seeking to protect endangered wildlife.

Surrounded by a protest that included lines of logging trucks parked in downtown Salem, a divided board voted 4-3 to send the Western Oregon State Forests Habitat Conservation Plan to federal officials for approval.

The final vote came after three different motions to delay failed, and many members of the public implored the board to take a different course.





What the Habitat Conservation Plan would do


The HCP is designed to bring western Oregon’s forests into alignment with the federal Endangered Species Act, preserving habitat for at least 17 threatened or endangered species.

But the plan also means reducing the amount of timber harvest on state forests, which means less revenue for local county services, including schools, and less jobs in rural areas already hard-hit by the decline in logging.

The plan would scale back logging to an estimated 185 million board feet of timber on western Oregon state forests. Over the last decade, the same forests have produced about 225 million board feet, officials said.




Multiple members of the public testified the move would devastate local economies and contribute to additional sawmills closing, following three that have closed in the past two months.

Board members, who have been considering the plan for years, appeared to agonize over the the final vote.

“I see the real and hard consequences of this action,” said Ben Deumling, who manages Zena Forest in the Willamette Valley and voted in favor of the HCP. “I just don’t see a better path. A lot of people have told me there is one, and I wish from the bottom of my heart that that were true. But I don’t see that.”

Board chair Jim Kelly, who also voted in favor of the HCP, noted the board was constrained by the Endangered Species Act.

“We’re here because of the ESA which, like it or not, is the law of the land,” Kelly said. “People on both sides today made totally legit points. Our job means we have to look at big picture.”

Plan moves to federal agencies for approval



The meeting opened with Oregon state forester Cal Mukumoto, head of the Oregon Department of Forestry, recommending the board approve the HCP.

He noted despite lower harvest levels, the plan was important because it provides a more “stable environment to operate” free from lawsuits and legal risk. Currently, ODF complies with the ESA through a process called “take avoidance” that requires costly species surveys and creates uncertainty around logging projects, the agency said.

By creating an HCP, the department becomes insulated from lawsuits and can harvest a more reliable — although smaller — amount of timber.


The plan will now be sent for approval from federal agencies, including NOAA Fisheries and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Opponents blast Habitat Conservation Plan



Opponents of the plan protested the HCP’s passage. Logging trucks encircled the ODF building where the meeting was held. In public testimony, speakers said the decision would lead to jobs lost and fewer community services. In addition, they said, it would lead to ODF losing money that would eventually need to come from taxpayers.

“Your vote to adopt this plan would be a catastrophic miscalculation,” former state lawmaker and 2022 gubernatorial candidate Betsy Johnson said. “The state’s general fund cannot sustain the hole that you’re digging. Schools will close. Roads will deteriorate. Economies in northwest Oregon will suffer. Oregonians will remember you, and not favorably.”

Jen Hamaker, president of Oregon Natural Resource Industries, said the HCP would lead to a loss of over $30 million annually in revenue, which might have gone to the counties and smaller taxing districts to pay for fundamental public services. A percentage of the revenue generated by timber sales on state lands goes to counties.

“Our communities will not be the same," Tillamook County Commissioner Erin Skaar said in a news release. "More mills will close, and counties will have increased expenses that frankly, we do not know how we will fund.”

Environmental groups applaud passage



Environmental groups applauded passage of the plan. They said Oregon’s state forests have been overharvested for years and the HCP was the bare minimum the agency could do to stop the extinction of numerous species including northern spotted owls, marbled murrelets, salmon and steelhead, martens, red tree voles, torrent salamanders, and others.

“The HCP will allow forest management to move forward in a more balanced manner for habitat, clean water, and recreation, alongside sustainable timber harvest,” said Michael Lang, senior policy manager with the Wild Salmon Center.

Kelly appeared to agree that Oregon's state forests were overharvested. He noted that of Oregon's total forest, 60% is owned by the federal government but only contributes 12% of the total timber harvested. By contrast, state forests includes only 3% of the state's total forest but makes up 10% of the timber harvested.

“At the end of the day, most Oregonians don’t want state forests to be managed like commercial tree farms,” he said.

Gov. Tina Kotek looks to 'alleviate fiscal impact'

Gov. Tina Kotek said in a letter her office was investigating "whether and how we might alleviate the fiscal impact" to counties impacted by the loss of timber revenue.

"I want you to know that I see a viable pathway forward to address the estimated reduction in timber receipts," the governor wrote. "I am committed to continuing this work with the expectation of bringing a proposal to the 2025 legislative session to permanently address the estimated shortfall."
Motions to delay narrowly fail

In the final vote, Kelly, Deumling, Chandra Ferrari and Brenda McComb all voted in favor of approving the HCP. Joe Justice, Karla Chambers and Liz Agpaoa voted against it.

In the lead up to the final vote, Justice, Chambers and Agpaoa each put forward motions that would have delayed the approval. The motions called for additional study or finding ways to increase harvest level, but all three failed along the same lines.


Zach Urness has been an outdoors reporter in Oregon for 15 years and is host of the Explore Oregon Podcast. Urness is the author of “Best Hikes with Kids: Oregon” and “Hiking Southern Oregon.” He can be reached at zurness@StatesmanJournal.com or (503) 399-6801. Find him on Twitter at @ZachsORoutdoors.

 

Swedish Floating Wind Project Could Include Fish Farms

Freja Offshore, a joint venture between Hexicon and Mainstream Renewable Power, has entered into a collaboration with the Norwegian company Subfarm to enable fish farms inside the Mareld floating offshore wind farm, proposed to be built in the North Sea, off the coast of Lysekil in Sweden.

The two companies will work together on a project that will take a closer look at how electricity production and fisheries can be combined, according to Freja Offshore, which submitted a planning application under the Swedish Economic Zone Act (SEZ) for the 2.5 GW floating wind farm last year.

Lysekil Municipality, the research institute DHI and the Norwegian industrial cluster Blue Maritime Cluster are also participating in the new collaborative project that aims to develop the possibility of running sustainable fish farms within the Mareld offshore wind farm site.

Freja Offshore says that previous studies show that offshore wind farms can act as artificial reefs and marine protected areas, which increases the amount of fish and shellfish. While larger fishing vessels cannot pass through the wind farm, there are good opportunities for fish farming, the developer says.

At the Marled offshore wind farm, the fish farms are planned to be placed between the wind turbine foundations and anchored with their own anchoring system. The fish cages will be lowered to a depth of 50–70 metres and hoisted up to the surface for checks and harvesting.

Subfarm, which has been working since 2018 on solutions that enable sustainable fish farming, has developed the technology that can withstand tough weather conditions in the North Sea and is based on methods previously used in the oil and gas industry for decades. The entire system is controlled from a control station on land, Freja Offshore says.

US natural gas pipeline accidents pose big, unreported climate threat

Fri, March 8, 2024 



A warning sign for a natural gas pipeline is seen at an oil pump site outside of Williston, North Dakota


By Nichola Groom

(Reuters) - Last October, an Idaho farmer using a backhoe punched a hole into a 22-inch (56-cm) pipeline buried under a field, sending more than 51 million cubic feet of natural gas hissing into the air.

While the incident on Williams Companies' Northwest Pipeline was big, it was no anomaly along the roughly 3 million miles (4.8 million km) of natural gas pipelines crisscrossing the U.S.

Accidental pipeline leaks – caused by things like punctures, corrosion, severe weather and faulty equipment - happen routinely and are a climate menace that is not currently counted in the official U.S. tally of greenhouse gas emissions, according to a Reuters examination of public data and regulatory documents.

Pipeline mishaps unintentionally released nearly 9.7 billion cubic feet of gas into the atmosphere between 2019 and late 2023, according to a Reuters examination of incident report data maintained by the U.S. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA).

That is the climate equivalent of running four average-sized coal-fired power plants for a year, according to an Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) online calculator.

Those emissions are currently not included in the nation’s official greenhouse gas count because federal rules exempt large, unexpected leaks, and mainly only capture emissions from regular operations, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The Biden administration aims to change that as early as next year under a set of rules proposed by the EPA to crack down on methane emissions from the oil and gas sector, and which would punish emitters with fees of $900 to $1,500 per metric ton when they exceed a certain threshold.

Reuters relied on PHMSA data and interviews with researchers, company officials and regulators to provide new detail on the scale of greenhouse gas emissions from accidental pipeline leaks that could soon be added to the official greenhouse gas tally, as well as the potential cost to companies under the looming fees.

"I don't think the public or regulators have realized just how much methane has been lost from pipeline infrastructure," said Kenneth Clarkson, a spokesperson for the Pipeline Safety Trust, a non-profit watchdog. "Newer studies have come closer to capturing the true amount of emissions and this has started catching the attention of policymakers."

Accidental leaks reported from PHMSA by the five biggest U.S. pipelines between 2018 and 2022 showed that those incidents could have significantly increased the facilities' overall reported emissions, potentially resulting in fees of up to $40 million under the proposal.

The operators of the five biggest pipelines include Berkshire Hathaway, TC Energy and Kinder Morgan.

Berkshire Hathaway's 14,000-mile Northern Natural Gas pipeline, for instance, reported unintended releases of natural gas to PHMSA during the five year period that were the equivalent of about 30% of the methane the facility reported to EPA during the period.

Williams, the owner of the pipeline that leaked in Idaho in October, reported unintended gas releases that amounted to about 15% of the methane it reported to EPA.

Berkshire Hathaway and Williams did not respond to requests for comment on Reuters' analysis or the EPA proposal.

TC Energy said reducing its methane emissions was a critical part of its business, but did not comment directly on the EPA proposal or Reuters' analysis.

Kinder Morgan said it does not exclude unintended emissions from its reports to EPA, even though it is not required to include them.

BIG DISCREPANCY

The Biden administration unveiled its batch of final rules aimed at cracking down on U.S. oil and gas industry releases of methane at the United Nations COP28 climate change conference in Dubai in December, part of international efforts to curb releases of the gas.

Piped natural gas is typically around 90% methane, a greenhouse gas which is several times more potent in warming the planet than carbon dioxide during the relatively short time it remains in the atmosphere.

The new policies would ban routine flaring of natural gas produced by newly drilled oil wells, require oil companies to monitor for leaks from well sites and compressor stations and establishes a program to use third party remote sensing to detect large methane releases.

The new reporting requirements for large leaks, meanwhile, are likely to be finalized later this year and take effect in 2025, the EPA told Reuters.

Under the proposal, companies will be required to report abnormal leaks of about 500,000 cubic feet of pipeline gas or more starting next year, a threshold significantly lower than what PHMSA requires.

The new reporting rules would also apply to big, unplanned emissions from other parts of the oil and gas industry, such as drilling operations, EPA said.

The fact that some large methane leaks have never been accounted for in U.S. greenhouse gas inventories underscore concerns among environmental groups and scientific researchers that emissions from the fossil fuel sector have been vastly understated.

An Environmental Defense Fund analysis last year, for instance, estimated U.S. pipelines leak between 1.2 million and 2.6 million tons of methane per year, or 3.75 to 8 times more than EPA estimates.

The EDF figure includes not just large mishaps but also pervasive smaller leaks on tiny distribution lines.

"The failure of EPA to account for these large events is a big driver of that discrepancy," Edwin LaMair, an EDF attorney who focuses on oil and gas regulations, said in an interview.

The Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, a pipeline industry trade group, said most incidents reported to PHMSA relate to safety systems operating as intended.

The group also pointed to an EPA analysis showing that most transmission and storage facilities may not meet the 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year emissions threshold required to pay the methane fee.

The EPA analysis said, however, that it was not yet possible to accurately estimate "the magnitude of emissions that will be reported and which facilities will report those emissions."

The pipeline industry has also said in public comments to the EPA about the new reporting rules that they could lead to double-counting of some emissions.

(Reporting by Nichola Groom; Editing by Richard Valdmanis and Marguerita Choy)

New study reveals what urban coyotes are really eating in San Francisco

By Amanda Bartlett
March 10, 2024

On a foggy morning just after 7 a.m., Tali Caspi sat behind the wheel of a golf cart and drove across the manicured hills of the San Francisco Golf Club, searching for evidence.

Dew clung to the greenery, and save for a couple of red-tailed hawks soaring through the sky, there wasn’t a soul in sight. Armed with Google Maps and a fanny pack, the UC Davis Ph.D. student zoomed along the fairway until she found a thicket of bushes. She put the cart in park, stepped out and knelt down in the wet grass, scrutinizing the lumpy brown object that lay before her. It was exactly what she had been looking for: coyote poop.

She jotted down the information in her field notebook: where she had found the scat and what time of day it was. Then, she slid on a pair of white rubber gloves and retrieved a little tube filled with ethanol from her fanny pack, taking off a piece of the scat and shoving it into the tube with a wooden applicator stick to help preserve the DNA. She labeled and sealed it, and set off to find more.

Caspi’s notes from that day spare no detail. Some of the found samples were “full of cherry plum pits and berries” while others were “twisted in shape and full of hair.” One had just been deposited by a coyote she saw darting across the course and was mottled with tiny bones. There were traces of orange peel and aluminum foil, and one in particular was overflowing with peanuts.

Caspi has spent two years of her mornings like this, traversing over 621 miles throughout San Francisco — crisscrossing popular neighborhoods, scouring cemeteries and soccer fields, even breaking her foot during one hike up Bernal Hill — on her quest to find out what urban coyotes living in the city are actually eating.

“I feel like there’s not a park, not a trail that I haven’t been on,” Caspi, who conducts her research through UC Davis' mammalian ecology and conservation unit, told SFGATE. “I have them all memorized like the back of my hand at this point. And I can tell you, truly every green space that you can think of in the city has coyotes. San Francisco is totally saturated.”

The animals are native to California, and after years of no sightings, they recolonized San Francisco in the early 2000s, when they began building dens again after police ended the practice of killing them as they ventured into the city. Since then, their numbers have grown considerably. San Francisco Animal Care and Control estimates that there are about 100 individuals living in the city, with each mating pair establishing their own 1-to-2-square-mile territory, ranging from the Presidio and Golden Gate Park to Lands End, Coit Tower and McLaren Park. Some even took up residence at a solar panel project in the Sunset. “These are really adaptable creatures,” Caspi said.

Yet, as more and more sightings of coyotes were reported, concerns rose surrounding the animals and the potential threat they posed for young children and pets. Caspi, whose primary interest was in studying how people and urban wildlife coexist, happened to be in the right place at the right time when she reached out to the Presidio Trust and the San Francisco Recreation and Park Department regarding possible research for her Ph.D. in 2019.

“They were like, ‘Oh, we’ve been waiting for you,’” Caspi said. “‘We have growing issues with coyotes in the city.’ They had some data, but no one had the time or funds or ability to really analyze it.”

With help from Janet Kessler — also known as the “Coyote Lady,” who has been documenting the city’s coyote population for the last 16 years — she made it her mission to raise awareness about the often-misunderstood animals, studying their behavior and social dynamics but also learning more about their eating habits: how they vary by location and are influenced by an urban environment, as well as how those habits change for each individual animal over the course of its life.

Caspi’s been able to figure this out by not only gathering stool samples from live coyotes, but also collecting the tips of whiskers from roadkill specimens and sending them off to a lab for further analysis. More information regarding the precise breakdown won’t be available until later this year. But the findings she’s discovered so far are groundbreaking, and could even change the way people think about and study coyotes in the future.

One of the most surprising takeaways? The canines are scarfing down much more human food than previously thought.

“I’ve found a whole bunch of weird stuff,” Caspi said. “I’ve found chocolate. I’ve found mango. I’ve found grapes. But the biggest, most frequent offender is chicken.”

It’s worth noting the coyotes’ taste for poultry could be coming from a lot of different sources, like dog kibble, or discarded McNuggets that they’re fishing out of people’s garbage. The DNA metabarcoding process Caspi uses can only determine the type of food or prey remains that are present, not necessarily where they’re coming from. However, human handouts are a worsening issue that SFACC has been attempting to mitigate for years, and Caspi herself has witnessed people leaving out entire rotisserie chickens, tortillas and several pounds of ground meat for coyotes.

The motivation for this is unclear. When coyotes shed their coats in the summer, they can take on a scraggly appearance, causing many people to think they’re malnourished. Others want to “befriend” or take photos of them, and some even seem to hope that if they give them food, the coyotes won’t go after their pets, Deb Campbell, a spokesperson for SFACC, told SFGATE. You should never feed a coyote: It’s illegal and punishable by jail time or a fine of up to $1,000, and people are encouraged to call SFACC at 415-554-9400 if they see someone doing it, she said. It’s a problem that hurts everyone, especially the naturally skittish coyotes, which start to lose their fear of humans, become more emboldened to approach them and regularly visit neighborhoods they come to associate with treats.

“There’s a big misconception people have that if they see them wandering around the city, they must be starving and need our help,” Caspi said. “But they don’t — and trust me, they’re definitely not starving.”

Swaths of San Francisco residents are unintentionally catering to coyotes by feeding their pets outside and not removing uneaten traces of food, forgetting to secure their trash and recycling and not cleaning up the seed around bird feeders or fallen fruit from trees in their front yards, Campbell said.

And it shows in Caspi’s research, which has demonstrated that coyotes’ diets are rich in other foods like pork, fish and soybeans easily scavenged from a dense urban landscape. That’s not to say they’re not very capable hunters — coyotes also frequently seek out natural prey like squirrels, gophers and raccoons. Data collected by Caspi has also proven the animals are even willing to venture out to the coastline for a good meal, as was the case when several of them feasted upon a stranded fin whale that washed up on Fort Funston in 2021.

 

Gartner Research: EVs Will Be Cheaper To Produce Than ICE Vehicles In 3 Years

  • Gartner Research: New OEM incumbents want to heavily redefine the status quo in automotive.

  • Tesla’s most affordable model is now cheaper than its ICE peer, the BMW 3-series.

  • The most vicious competition in the space will lead to the demise of many EV startups.

For many years, electric vehicle critics have been pessimistic that EVs will ever go mainstream because they, have argued, will always be more expensive than fossil fuel-powered vehicles. Market experts have repeatedly pointed out that EVs need to achieve cost parity with ICE vehicles if they ever hope to displace them from our roads. Luckily for EV buffs, there’s growing evidence that this might happen sooner than many expect. Stiff competition, especially from China, as well as an oversupplied market have become a nightmare for companies like Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA), with the world’s most valuable automaker embroiled in never-ending price wars. Tesla has seen its profit margins tumble in recent years after repeatedly cutting prices of its models, with the sharp fall in the price of battery materials unable to fully offset lower sticker prices.

This is, obviously, bad news for EV investors, but is good news for buyers of electric vehicles. Indeed, Tesla’s most affordable model is now cheaper than its ICE peer, "The Model 3’s starting price is now $6,500 less than the cheapest BMW 3 Series, which is often seen as the Tesla sedan’s most direct gasoline-powered competitor," Bloomberg has noted. But one market expert now believes that this is bound to become an industry-wide trend in a matter of years. Gartner has predicted that EVs will be cheaper to produce than ICE vehicles of the same size in three short years, thanks in large part to improvements in manufacturing methods with production costs dropping faster than battery costs. 

New OEM incumbents want to heavily redefine the status quo in automotive. They brought new innovations that simplify production costs such as centralized vehicle architecture or the introduction of gigacastings that help reduce manufacturing cost and assembly time, which legacy automakers had no choice to adopt to survive,”Pedro Pacheco, vice president of research at Gartner, has said. 

Unfortunately, the vicious competition in the space will lead to the demise of many EV startups, as we have already witnessed with the likes of Lordstown Motors and Proterra. Gartner has predicted that by 2027, 15% of EV companies founded since the last decade will either be bankrupt or will have been acquired. According to Pacheco, the EV sector “...is simply entering a new phase where companies with the best products and services will win over the remaining.” 

"The bankruptcy of Lordstown signals that the days of successful EV startups is in the rear-view mirror. Moving forward it will be Tesla and the traditional incumbents ... that will duke it out for market share," Thomas Hayes, chairman at hedge fund Great Hill Capital, told Reuters shortly after Lordstown filed for bankruptcy. The EV startup went under after failing to resolve a dispute over a promised investment from Taiwan's Foxconn.

Another downside to EVs becoming cheaper: according to Gartner, the average cost of an EV body and battery repair after a serious accident will jump by 30% by 2027, meaning it will be cheaper to just write off the vehicle than undertake the repairs.

Tesla, EV Stocks Hammered

As you might expect, investing in the EV space has become a high-risk venture amid shrinking sales and contracting margins. Tesla shares have tanked 29.2% in the year-to-date after Morgan Stanley’s Adam Jonas cut Tesla’s price target on weakening EV demand. Jonas warned that hybrids are competing for the marginal EV buyer while fleets are dumping EV plans. He also raises the possibility that Tesla will post negative profit margins in its pivotal auto segment in the current year. 

"We expect Tesla’s 1H24 results to come in below expectations on profitability, with GAAP OP margins in the 2-3% range, implying underlying EV manufacturing margins (ex downstream retail and ZEV credits) to be potentially in the red," he updated.

Jonas sees Tesla’s FY24 automotive gross margin falling to 11.4%, including a single-digit margin rate for Q2. He has also cut the company’s FY24 EPS estimate to $0.99 vs. $1.54 previously and lowered non-GAAP EPS estimate to $1.51 vs. $2.04 previously. However, he has stuck with an Overweight rating on the EV stock, "We believe Tesla has significant attributes to be valued as an AI beneficiary, but the company must see a stabilization in the negative earnings revisions within the auto business first. We do not believe Tesla will get credit as an AI company as long as core auto earnings are being revised down. This process may take a few more quarters to see through, over which time our $100 bear case may be in play."

Tesla’s EV peers have not fared any better:  Rivian Automotive (NASDAQ:RIVN) has tumbled 45.2% YTD; Fisker Inc. (NYSEFSR) has crashed 78.0% while Lucid Group (NASDAQ:LCID) has declined 26.4%.

Long-term Tesla investors are, however, not complaining with the stock having returned a handsome 830% over the past five years.

By Alex Kimani for Oilprice.com

 

Bear River Tribal Council Joins Yurok in Formally Opposing Offshore Wind Development Along the North Coast


The two offshore lease areas slated for development. | Map: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

###

PREVIOUSLY: 

###

Press release from the Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria:

On Tuesday March 5th, 2024, The Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria Tribal Council voted to formally oppose the development of offshore wind, the effects of transmission lines over land and across the ocean floor, the development of the harbor area, and the East/West rail lines.

All of these projects are related to the implementation of offshore wind off the Bear River Coastline and directly through Bear River Ancestral Territory.

The Tribal Council Opposes offshore wind in our Territory for the following reasons:

  • There is insufficient and inadequate scientific research on the adverse environmental impacts associated with floating wind turbines and platforms, the development of a massive Harbor, the effects to marine life from the subsea transmission cables and the effects over land transmission lines to the habitats of endangered/protected species such as the Humboldt Martin and Snowy Plover, just to name a couple.
  • The 900 foot tall turbines impact the view shed from sacred cultural sites along the coast.
  • The sacrifice of our Cultural and Natural Resources for the benefit of more electrical capacity for large cities in Central and Southern California is a scenario that we will not accept.

The Tribal Council is deeply concerned with the potential effects of these projects on marine life in the ocean off our coast as well as the effects to the Estuaries of the Eel and Mattole Rivers.

Additionally, while not in our ancestral territory, we are deeply concerned with the effects of offshore wind to Yurok territory, whom we have interlinked with by our membership and their membership through marriage.

It is the opinion of the Bear River Tribal Council that the effects of these offshore wind projects will be disastrous to the Cultural and Natural Resources of all Native Territories in the area and we seek unity amongst Tribes to protect these things which we have been the protectors of since time immemorial.

HIP CAPITALI$T $WEAT $HOP FA$HION 

Zara owner under pressure to publish supply chain details

By Eleanor Butler

Unlike other major retailers, Inditex doesn't share the names of its suppliers - a stance that makes investors nervous.

Investors are putting pressure on Spanish clothing company Inditex to share more information about its supply chain, according to Reuters.

Inditex, the largest apparel retailer in the world, is the owner of brands Zara, Bershka, Pull&Bear, Massimo Dutti, Oysho and Stradivarius.

The firm publishes an annual list detailing the number of suppliers it buys goods from in 12 key countries, but the names of specific factories are withheld.

This bucks a trend set by major clothing retailers like Adidas, H&M, and Primark, who all share this information.

Dutch asset manager MN, an Inditex shareholder, told Reuters: "In our engagement with Inditex, one of the things we ask is if they could disclose a list of their suppliers and the geographical location."

"Even though Inditex assures us that they have this data available, up until now Inditex is not willing to disclose this information unlike some industry peers who publish extensive supplier lists."

Shareholders can more effectively manage their investments if they can monitor the reliability of specific suppliers.

Investors and regulators are also encouraging firms to be more transparent about their production in order to combat unethical practices and ensure fair conditions for workers.

KnowTheChain, a group that investigates company labour practices, placed Inditex 15 out of 65 countries ranked in its 2023 assessment.

"The company is encouraged to strengthen its supply chain transparency by disclosing a full, rather than partial, list of its direct suppliers," the firm said.

Inditex nonetheless scored highly for "commitment and governance", a ranking given because of the firm's clarity on internal responsibility for upholding standards on forced labour.

In response to a request from Euronews business, Inditex declined to comment on whether it would be making its supplier list public.

One possibility as to why Inditex doesn't share its information is that, if it did, it could face more competition for the factories in question.