Friday, April 04, 2025

Two Immigrant First Amendment Heroes Separated by Three Centuries


 April 4, 2025
Facebook

Engraving of Andrew Hamilton defending John Peter Zenger in court, 1734-5 – Public Domain

Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish doctoral student in child psychology at Tufts University in Medford, was standing alone on a sidewalk last Tuesday when she was surrounded a gang of  unidentified black-clad assailants wearing black masks, Screaming in terror, the 30-year-old woman had her wrists cuffed behind her  back, and was spirited  away to an unmarked SUV even arrested, since her accostors weren’t even sworn officers of the law —  in an unmarked SUV, driven across multiple state lines and brought to a number of government offices in violation of a federal court order. Over a period of 24 hours, during which she may not even have been offered any food, even though when kidnapped she had been on her way to break the Ramadan fast with friends, she was  flown and driven without anyone’s knowledge and dumped in a for-profit privately contracted detention cent in Louisiana, where she now awaits potential deportation. In all that frightening time she was never formally arrested, because the thugs who hd grabbed her were not sworn law-enforcement officers.

Her “crime?”  Committing journalism.

 Although Ozturk has not been charged with anything, her student visa has nonetheless been voided by a boastful Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who claims an article she co-wrote (over a year ago!) in the Tufts student paper shows she is a supporter of Hamas, is “antisemitic” and “could interfere with US foreign policy”—all patently absurd falsehoods.

Read the op-ed article she co-authored in a student newspaper which is the whole basis for Rubio’s action. If you, dear reader, can discover  the remotest shred of evidence of the authors’ supporting Hamas of being anti-semitic, much less a threat to US foreign policy, pleas email Rubio, because he sure hasn’t found it!

John Peter Zenger immigrated to New York from his native Germany in 1770 at the age of 13, where he was apprenticed to a New York printer named William Bradford. He e stablished his own printing business thirteen years later, printing his own news broadsheet, the New York Weekly Journal in 1733. A  political publication it focused on exposing the corruption of royally appointed Colonial Governor William Cosby. When Cosby sued Zenger for the libel, the .pioneering newsman found himself locked away in jail for 10 months awaiting trial.

You may wonder why I am writing about Ozturk and Zenger together in this article. My reason is to point out that Ozturk and Zenger are book ends to the history of the First Amendment — the one that guarantees freedom of speeach, association, religion, the right to petition for redress of grievances  and freedom of the press.

Zenger, even before the “shot heard round the world” that in Lexington Massachusetts on April 19, 1775 launched the American Revolution and among other things, laid down a marker asserting freedom of the press in the 13 British colonies. He did this by convincing a jury of the truth of his articles and having all charges dropped. It was the first case of freedom of the press to speak truth to power. The closely watched court case played an important role in enshrining freedom of in the press in the US Constitiution as that founding document’s First Amendment of 10 that became known collectively as the Bill of Rights, becoming the only profession to specifically have its freedom expressly protected.

Generations of journalists have learned about Zenger, who at any point could have sought some compromise to get out of jail and back to his printing business if not his newspaper. Instead, despite his having spent almost a year in jail, he chose to risk it all and have his case against the most powerful politial figure in the colony of New York put to a jury of his peers. That jury, ignoring the rulings of the judge on the case,  unanimously threw out the charges against Zenger in a n ealy example of jury nullificatrion.  In doing so, Zenger and those jurors established the principlein what would soon become the United States of Amnerica that truth is a powerful defense against libel and that the press must be free to report the truth.

It’s a lesson nobody apparently taught to Amazon founder and billionaire businessman and media baron Jeff Bezos  as a student (or if a teacher did try did try, Bzos was too busy planning how to make money to pay attention). Otherwise, how could he have just announced a few weeks ago that his publication, the once proudly independent Washington Post, would no longer  publish opinions critical of President Trump and how could he have banned a staff artist’s political cartoon depicting a group of[ of billionaires, including himself, genuflecting before a stern President Trump.  (The cartoonist resigned.)

As for that current hero Ozturk, her detention  ordeal is not over, though a federal judge has at least temporarily ruled that she cannot be moved or deported by the Trump administration’s agents until she rules on whether a federal court should have juristiction over her fate, and not Homeland Security or any other office operating under the authority of President Trump. 

Ozturk had the courage to co-author, along with three other students, an op-ed article over a year ago on Marh 4, 2024, in the Tufts’ student paper calling on the University President to adopt three resolutions voted by the Tufts Community Senate. These articles  called for for the university to condemn Israel for  commiting probable genocide in Gaza, for it to disclose the names of companies in the University’s investment portfolio that are Israeli or that do business with Israel, and for it to divest its portfolio of those holdings.

That student opinion article was provided  to the US State Department by a zionist organization, Canary Mission, which  claims its objective is  to “fight hatered of Jews on campuses.” The group singled out Ozturk as author and put her s photo on its website allegin on that in writing the op-ee she had “engaged in anti-Israeli activism in March 2024.”  “

Her “activism,” that is to say, consisted of co-authoring an article for a newspaper—a fundamental freedom described clearly and unambiguously  in the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

 US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said he revoked Ms. Ozturk’s student  visa for what she wrote, which is why she is now being detained and is facing deportation.

It ia critical that she and some 300 other students whose visas and even green card permanent residency documens have been revoked on similarly unconstitutional grounds by this man who loves to refer to the US, as the “leader of the free world,” making himself, the Trump administration, and sadly the entire United States, a laughingstock.

Ozturk should be freed immediately or be brought before an honest federal judge to hear the Trump government’s ludicrous case against her. When that happens, I hope she and her attorney demand a jury trial, so she can win the same sort of grand history-making jury slap-down of tyranical power that John Peter Zenger won three centuries centuries ago.

This article by Dave Lindorff appeared originally in ThisCantBeHappening! on its new Substack platform at https://thiscantbehappening.substack.com/. Please check out the new site and consider signing up for a cut-rate subscription that will be available until the end of the month.


\


Beyond Signalgate: Understanding the Real Scandal in Yemen



 April 4, 2025
Facebook

US striking Houthi positions in Yemen. Image Source: U.S. Air Force – Public Domain

On March 24, the country learned that a group of senior Trump administration officials (including the Vice President, Secretary of Defense, and the Director of National Intelligence, among others) accidentally sent classified details of military strikes against Yemen to Jeffrey Goldberg, editor of The Atlantic. Since Goldberg broke the story, there has been a steady stream of commentary about “Signalgate,” most adding little but sound and fury. The public discourse about Signalgate reveals something important about American politics—far more important than the incompetence at the center of the scandal. What has rarely been mentioned during the national conversation is the elephant in the room: the United States’ attacks on Yemen violate international law and contribute to one of the world’s most significant humanitarian crises.

The nightmare of the Washington ruling class is that we might finally open our eyes to the real, documented crimes going on in a country most Americans can’t find on a map. It would be difficult to overstate the degree of brutality and suffering that the United States has foisted upon the people of Yemen. And it is impossible to separate the United States’ strategic approach to Yemen from its support of the genocidal onslaught in Palestine. In the first year of the brutally one-sided terror campaign in the Gaza Strip, the U.S. gave billions in arms and other support to Israel, no questions asked. According to Brown University’s Costs of War project:

U.S. spending on Israel’s military operations and related U.S operations in the region total at least $22.76 billion and counting. This estimate is conservative; while it includes approved security assistance funding since October 7, 2023, supplemental funding for regional operations, and an estimated additional cost of operations, it does not include any other economic costs.

William Hartung, a senior research fellow at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, adds that arms offers during this period (that is, beyond the $17.9 billion in military aid, including items that have yet to be delivered) are worth more than $30 billion. Yemen’s Houthis have harried shipping lanes in response to the U.S.-supported genocide in the Gaza Strip, prompting the Biden administration to re-assign the group to its spurious terror list. Washington has frequently justified its crimes against the people of Yemen by pointing to the threat of Iran, treated as a state sponsor of terror. The first Trump administration, citing a national security emergency created by Tehran, rushed weapons to the Saudis against widespread concerns about the safety of civilians—members of the Trump government were sacked for raising concerns. It is worth asking: what is a state sponsor of terror? As it has been applied to real-world events, the notion itself is incoherent and unintelligible—that is, it is propaganda aimed at confusing and misleading comfortable Americans. To give meaning to this standard requires that we grapple with uncomfortable facts, and particularly after its illegal actions against Palestine and Yemen, the United States must be regarded as the world’s foremost sponsor of terrorism.

The U.S. has killed no less than 61 people since it began a new round of strikes on March 15, but its reckless attacks and disregard for civilian life go back more than two decades. The U.S. first began drone operations and airstrikes in Yemen in 2002, causing “significant civilian harm, and no one has been held to account for these actions.” According to the Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect, coalition airstrikes alone have killed almost 20,000 civilians, more than 2,300 of whom were children. At least 4 million people have been forcibly displaced. Today, Yemen is among the world’s poorest and most war-torn countries. We must be clear about what is happening in Yemen, because our media are committed to obscuring the truth: the intentional policy of the United States has been to starve Yemen—and to bomb its people when they cannot be starved to death. When Washington wants to kill massive numbers of innocent people without military action—to make sure they don’t have food, medicine, energy, and the other necessities of life—it uses a global-scale program of economic blockades, rationalized with vague gestures to “terrorism.” For years, the U.S. government has cut Yemen’s people off from the bare minimum necessary to survive, while attacking and destroying critical infrastructure. According to the UN Refugee Agency, over “18.2 million people are in dire need of humanitarian assistance and protection services,” with 5 million in conditions of acute food insecurity. About 10 million children in Yemen need humanitarian assistance of some kind. The U.S. supported war and the blockade have created an economic disaster in Yemen. Last summer, a World Bank report stated that in the years between 2015 and 2023, Yemen lost more than half (54 percent) of its real GDP per person, putting most people in the country in dire poverty.

The language around “terrorism” is central to Washington’s attempts to control the narrative and to conjure public support for—or at least public ignorance of—its patently illegal campaign in Yemen. As Phyllis Bennis recently pointed out, the U.S. attacks on Yemen are “always referred to as ‘bombing the Iran-backed Houthi rebels’ to avoid acknowledging that, like in Gaza, the bombs are dropping on civilian infrastructure and civilians already facing devastating hunger.”

Yemen and Palestine have tested the limits of the imperial system—how many innocent women and children can we liquidate before self-absorbed, mindlessly scrolling, Netflix-watching, garbage-eating Americans will bat an eyelash? Lots of them apparently. The Signal story is the perfect apparently anti-Trump narrative for the chattering classes: they need not even pretend to stake out a progressive position contrary to Trump. As legal residents who have broken no law are disappeared from our streets for opposing a genocide in Palestine—fully supported by both wings of the ruling class—the ruling class can focus our attention and loyalties on America’s righteous military mission.

Imperialism is the shared faith of the ruling class because the entire American economic and social system depends on it—the cheap treats that pacify us and hide the true features of the system of production: the land theft, the slave labor, the extraction of natural resources, the oppressive “intellectual property” regime that gives the very ideas themselves to privileged corporate rentiers. If the forever wars are ever questioned, the whole governing ideology and political paradigm are thrown open to scrutiny. And they cannot survive a closer look, because they represent criminal behavior at its most shameless.

Washington’s savagery in Yemen, and the corporate press’s bizarre reaction thereto, points to a deep moral crisis and loss of direction in the United States. We seem to be incapable of confronting the government’s malign influence in the world and its near-constant violations of the most fundamental principles of international law. But we will not understand MAGA fascism as a social and political phenomenon until we see clearly its connection with American empire and its crimes against innocent people, including those of Yemen.

David S. D’Amato is an attorney, businessman, and independent researcher. He is a Policy Advisor to the Future of Freedom Foundation and a regular opinion contributor to The Hill. His writing has appeared in Forbes, Newsweek, Investor’s Business Daily, RealClearPolitics, The Washington Examiner, and many other publications, both popular and scholarly. His work has been cited by the ACLU and Human Rights Watch, among others.

Thursday, April 03, 2025

Signs of the Times

Addicts are children of God. Helping them will fix the drug crisis, not tariffs on Mexico.


(RNS) — Dropping bombs and killing drug dealers may look good on television, but the real war on drugs occurs in treatment programs, which are terribly underfunded.


(Photo by Mart Production/Pexels/Creative Commons)


Thomas Reese
April 2, 2025

(RNS) — President Donald Trump loves tariffs. He uses them to bully countries into accepting his policies — for example, to get Mexico to stop migrants from coming across the border and to crack down on gangs shipping drugs into the United States.

He labeled drug cartels as terrorist organizations and his administration has threatened to use the U.S. military to attack them in Mexico.

Trump’s critics need to acknowledge that his efforts against Mexico have been somewhat successful. Fewer migrants are at our border because Mexico has stopped them at points farther south. This crackdown started under former President Joe Biden and has continued under Trump.

The Mexican government has also been more aggressive in going after drug gangs who make and ship drugs to the U.S. This has been difficult historically in Mexico because the drug lords have bought protection from police and politicians, and those they cannot bribe they threaten with violence.

But every time a gang leader or member is killed or arrested, there are others to take their places. In any case, Mexico will eventually tire of the war on drugs, as it has in the past, and will return to business as usual. And in anticipation of an American military attack, the gangs can easily disperse their drug facilities to make them more difficult to find and destroy.

I am not saying we should give up on trying to stop drugs from entering the U.S., but these attempts will never be very successful.

To deal with drugs, the U.S. needs to acknowledge its role in this crisis. That means dealing with guns and drug addiction in this country.
RELATED: Trump, the destroyer of worlds

The sale of guns is severely restricted in Mexico, with only one gun store in Mexico City, which is controlled by the army. Guns purchased in America and smuggled across the border are helping the very gangs the Trump administration has labeled terrorists.

Data shows anywhere from 68% to 90% of guns traced in Mexico were passed through the U.S., and most were also produced here. Thousands of guns are trafficked to Mexico each year.

If the Trump administration truly believes Mexican gangs are terrorists, then we must stop allowing them to get American-made guns. It could be considered granting material support to a terrorist organization, which is illegal. American gun dealers who sell guns that end up in Mexico are a greater threat to the U.S. than student protesters at Columbia University.

The Trump administration also falsely links drug trafficking with migrants crossing our borders. In truth, most drugs come through government checkpoints at the border in vehicles driven by American citizens. More agents, equipment, drug-sniffing dogs and intelligence are needed at these checkpoints if we are to put a dent in drug trafficking. But the drug traffickers’ response to seized drugs would be to simply ship more.

So, ultimately, the only way to stop the drug crisis is to cut demand. If there were no demand for drugs in the U.S., drug cartels would collapse. It is simple economics: Every addict in recovery is a lost customer for the cartels.

The pain of withdrawal from drugs is excruciating, and few addicts can do it on their own. Methadone and other alternatives to drugs can often help wean a person from drugs by reducing cravings.

Recovering from drug addiction is not easy. Anyone who wants treatment should be able to get into a program immediately and not be delayed because they have no insurance or there is no room. Depending on where you live, whether you have insurance and what type of program you are trying to get into, it can take weeks to get treatment — lots of time to relapse or change your mind.

Meanwhile, earlier this week, the Trump administration announced it was cutting about $11.4 billion in funding for grants for addiction treatment, mental health and other services, as well as staffing.

RELATED: Will Musk and Trump go to Hell for defunding the corporal works of mercy?

Dropping bombs and killing drug dealers may look good on television, but the real war on drugs occurs in treatment programs, which are terribly underfunded. Every addict, regardless of their income or where they live, should be able to get quality treatment. This is the only way we will win the war.

Every person, including a drug addict, is a child of God. They come from every race, every income bracket and every part of the country. They are Democrats and Republicans, believers and unbelievers, urban and rural, rich and poor. It doesn’t matter how they became addicted. They deserve to be treated with dignity and compassion.

The only way to win the war on drugs is to provide good treatment and support to addicts.