Saturday, April 11, 2026

 

Hidden ocean feedback loop could accelerate climate change



URochester scientists identify how warming oceans may trigger increased methane emissions, adding a key insight for current climate models.




University of Rochester






The world’s oceans may be quietly amplifying climate change in ways scientists are only beginning to understand.

In a new study published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesUniversity of Rochester scientists—including Thomas Weber, an associate professor in the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, and graduate student Shengyu Wang and postdoctoral research associate Hairong Xu in Weber’s lab—uncovered a key mechanism behind methane production in the open ocean. Their research indicates that this mechanism could intensify as the planet warms, providing an alarming feedback loop for global warming.

Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas, and for decades scientists have puzzled over a paradox: surface ocean waters consistently release methane into the atmosphere, even though surface water is rich in oxygen. Traditionally, methane production has been associated with oxygen-free environments, such as wetlands or deep sediments.

Weber’s team set out to solve this puzzle using a global dataset and computer modeling. Their findings point to a specific microbial process that is responsible for methane production in the ocean environment: certain bacteria generate methane as a byproduct when they break down organic compounds, but they only do this when the nutrient phosphate is scarce.

“This means that phosphate scarcity is the primary control knob for methane production and emissions in the open ocean,” Weber says.

The findings reframe how scientists understand methane production in the ocean. Rather than being a rare or unusual process, methane production in oxygen-rich environments may be widespread in regions where phosphate is limited.

But the study extends further than explaining marine methane production in the present—it also offers a troubling glimpse into the future.

“Climate change is warming the ocean from the top down, increasing the density difference between surface and deep waters,” Weber says. “This is expected to slow the vertical mixing that carries nutrients like phosphate up from depth.”

According to the team’s model, with less vertical mixing, surface waters could become increasingly nutrient-starved, creating ideal conditions for methane-producing microbes to thrive.

The result, Weber warns, would be more methane released from the ocean into the atmosphere. Because methane is such a potent greenhouse gas, this creates the potential for a harmful feedback loop: warming oceans lead to more methane emissions, which in turn drive further warming.

The findings highlight how even processes occurring at the microscopic level in the ocean can have global consequences.

Crucially, this feedback is not currently included in major climate projection models. As researchers continue to refine climate models, incorporating feedbacks such as this may be essential for accurately predicting the pace and scale of future climate change.

“Our work will help fill a key gap in climate predictions, which often overlook interactions between the changing environment and natural greenhouse gas sources to the atmosphere,” Weber says.

Warming Intensifies Rainfall In North Atlantic Storms


By Eurasia Review


Rapid ocean warming is likely to make tropical cyclone rainfall more intense and longer lasting, increasing flood risks in parts of the North Atlantic region.

A new study led by Newcastle University using satellite data shows that tropical cyclones and their post-tropical cyclone counterparts are responding quite differently to surface warming. The findings reveal that during the tropical cyclone phase, warmer and more humid conditions are causing storm slowdown and strongly increasing rainfall intensity.

Tropical cyclones are a major driver of very heavy rainfall in warm parts of the world. They can bring huge downpours that not only significantly add to total seasonal rainfall but also increase the risk of flash flooding. In the North Atlantic, these storms are especially important during the peak hurricane season (Aug-Oct), with tropical cyclones producing as much as 30–40% of all rainfall in some regions during that season.

Published in the journal npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, the study shows that storm precipitation is rising rapidly with temperature, with median increases of about 21% per degree increase in local dewpoint temperature, while the area of heavy rainfall expands by roughly 12.5% per degree of warming. At the same time, the overall size of the cyclone tends to shrink slightly with warming, although this process becomes weaker and can even reverse, causing larger tropical cyclones, when sea surface temperatures are very high, particularly in the Caribbean. In these warmer regions, tropical cyclones often move more slowly and last longer, producing more rainfall in one place, especially near to the centre of the storm, causing damaging floods.

In contrast, once storms transition into the post-tropical phase, losing their tropical characteristics as they move across the Atlantic towards Europe, they tend to expand in size but are less strongly affected by temperature changes. Rainfall concentrates to the northeast of the storm centre and over a wider area, often because the storm is moving faster and is driven by different (baroclinic) weather systems.


Study lead author, Dr Haider Ali, Senior Research Associate, at Newcastle University’s School of Engineering said: “The findings show that global warming is increasing both the intensity and area of rainfall from tropical cyclones, especially in warm, low-latitude regions. Because some storms may also move more slowly, this could greatly increase the risk of flooding in parts of the North Atlantic. This trend will likely continue with increased warming.”

Previously, storm size was typically treated as a fixed radius around the storm centre. In contrast, this study adopts a dynamic definition, allowing storm size to vary along the cyclone’s lifetime. Using observational data from satellites, the team examined how storm size, heavy precipitation metrics, and translation speed change with warming for North Atlantic tropical cyclones from 2001 to 2024. This approach provides a consistent framework for analysing storm evolution and assessing how heavy precipitation responds to a warming climate.

Professor Hayley Fowler, Professor of Climate Change Impacts at Newcastle University, and one of the study authors, said: “Tropical cyclones appear to be causing increasing damages from widespread damaging floods from persistent extreme rainfall events, such as in Hurricane Helene. Our study shows that this increase in extreme rainfall is directly linked to our warming climate, caused by our continued societal reliance on fossil fuels. These storms will continue to get wetter, producing more persistent and more intense rainfall and consequent flooding, until we reduce the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.”

Looking ahead, the next step is to shift the research focus from storms in the atmosphere to floods on the ground. The goal is to understand whether the most intense rainfall events lead to the most damaging river flooding. This causal link isn’t straightforward, since flood impacts depend on where rain falls, how long it lasts, and how wet catchments are prior to the rainfall event. By combining climate data with hydrological models, we can follow the full pathway from storm structure to rainfall to river flow. This helps identify not just heavy rain events, but the storms that truly translate into real flood risk for people and infrastructure.

Warming intensifies rainfall in North Atlantic storms



Newcastle University





Rapid ocean warming is likely to make tropical cyclone rainfall more intense and longer lasting, increasing flood risks in parts of the North Atlantic region.

A new study led by Newcastle University using satellite data shows that tropical cyclones and their post-tropical cyclone counterparts are responding quite differently to surface warming. The findings reveal that during the tropical cyclone phase, warmer and more humid conditions are causing storm slowdown and strongly increasing rainfall intensity.

Tropical cyclones are a major driver of very heavy rainfall in warm parts of the world. They can bring huge downpours that not only significantly add to total seasonal rainfall but also increase the risk of flash flooding. In the North Atlantic, these storms are especially important during the peak hurricane season (Aug-Oct), with tropical cyclones producing as much as 30–40% of all rainfall in some regions during that season.

Published in the journal npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, the study shows that storm precipitation is rising rapidly with temperature, with median increases of about 21% per degree increase in local dewpoint temperature, while the area of heavy rainfall expands by roughly 12.5% per degree of warming. At the same time, the overall size of the cyclone tends to shrink slightly with warming, although this process becomes weaker and can even reverse, causing larger tropical cyclones, when sea surface temperatures are very high, particularly in the Caribbean. In these warmer regions, tropical cyclones often move more slowly and last longer, producing more rainfall in one place, especially near to the centre of the storm, causing damaging floods.

In contrast, once storms transition into the post-tropical phase, losing their tropical characteristics as they move across the Atlantic towards Europe, they tend to expand in size but are less strongly affected by temperature changes. Rainfall concentrates to the northeast of the storm centre and over a wider area, often because the storm is moving faster and is driven by different (baroclinic) weather systems.

Study lead author, Dr Haider Ali, Senior Research Associate, at Newcastle University’s School of Engineering said: “The findings show that global warming is increasing both the intensity and area of rainfall from tropical cyclones, especially in warm, low-latitude regions. Because some storms may also move more slowly, this could greatly increase the risk of flooding in parts of the North Atlantic. This trend will likely continue with increased warming.”

Previously, storm size was typically treated as a fixed radius around the storm centre. In contrast, this study adopts a dynamic definition, allowing storm size to vary along the cyclone’s lifetime. Using observational data from satellites, the team examined how storm size, heavy precipitation metrics, and translation speed change with warming for North Atlantic tropical cyclones from 2001 to 2024. This approach provides a consistent framework for analysing storm evolution and assessing how heavy precipitation responds to a warming climate.

Professor Hayley Fowler, Professor of Climate Change Impacts at Newcastle University, and one of the study authors, said: “Tropical cyclones appear to be causing increasing damages from widespread damaging floods from persistent extreme rainfall events, such as in Hurricane Helene. Our study shows that this increase in extreme rainfall is directly linked to our warming climate, caused by our continued societal reliance on fossil fuels. These storms will continue to get wetter, producing more persistent and more intense rainfall and consequent flooding, until we reduce the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.”

Looking ahead, the next step is to shift the research focus from storms in the atmosphere to floods on the ground. The goal is to understand whether the most intense rainfall events lead to the most damaging river flooding. This causal link isn’t straightforward, since flood impacts depend on where rain falls, how long it lasts, and how wet catchments are prior to the rainfall event. By combining climate data with hydrological models, we can follow the full pathway from storm structure to rainfall to river flow. This helps identify not just heavy rain events, but the storms that truly translate into real flood risk for people and infrastructure.

Reference

Ali, H., Fowler, H. J., Reed, K. & Prein, A. F. (2026). Warmer temperatures lead to wetter tropical cyclones in the North Atlantic. npj Climate and Atmospheric Sciencehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-026-01363-2

--ends--

Exaggeration Of Real Ocean Climate Risks To Ireland Disrupts Future Planning
Cliffs of Moher in Ireland

April 11, 2026
By Eurasia Review


The real climate risks to Ireland from changes to the Atlantic currents that sustain our mild climate are obscured by exaggerated claims in media headlines and movies.

That’s according to Dr Gerard McCarthy, a Maynooth University (MU) oceanographer at the Irish Climate Analysis and Research UnitS (ICARUS) in the Department of Geography, who has led a new article for Nature Climate Change.

The latest paper is a retrospective on a landmark 2015 study led by Professor Stefan Rahmstorf, which identified long-term Atlantic cooling as a sign that the Atlantic Meridional Circulation (AMOC) was weakening.

“The extreme climate collapse scenarios depicted in the Hollywood film, The Day After Tomorrow, and even in headlines of reputable mainstream media are often not grounded in scientific reality, but the genuine risks for Ireland are still significant and require proper planning,” said Dr McCarthy.

“It has happened that a new paper comes out, you get headlines saying the AMOC is going to collapse in the next few years. What we need to do is bring together a broader scientific voice to properly assess all the existing AMOC research literature, rather than having these seesawing headlines that concern and confuse our policymakers,” said Dr McCarthy.


Dr McCarthy added, “the study led by Stefan Rahmstorf—one of the most influential studies of AMOC—used changes in sea surface temperature records stretching back over a century to build its case. The records show that the stretch of ocean lying between Ireland and Canada is the only region on Earth that has systematically cooled while almost everywhere else warmed.”

This retrospective paper – co-authored by Professor Hans-Otto Pörtner of the Alfred Wegener Institute in Bremerhaven – considered the questions raised by the Rahmstorf paper and highlighted the need for a clearer scientific consensus, setting the stage for a larger international research project called the AMOC in Focus assessment report, which Dr McCarthy is co-leading and is sponsored by JPI Ocean and JPI Climate.

This project is a 60-scientist, 14-country initiative aimed at producing authoritative, usable guidance for policymakers in Europe and around the world.

Regarding what AMOC changes mean for Ireland’s future, Dr McCarthy said it’s likely we will see relative cooling in the Atlantic.

“Cooling is not really what I’m worried about. What concerns me is changes in precipitation patterns and storminess. A weakening AMOC tightens the temperature gradient that fuels Atlantic storms, like a taut elastic band – and then more of those storms get catapulted towards Ireland. Ireland sits right at the end of this system. We are hugely dependent on the heat it transports, so we need a clear consensus voice, grounded in science, to plan properly,” said Dr McCarthy.

Dr McCarthy is an expert on AMOC; the system of ocean currents, sometimes known as the Gulf Stream System, that is critical to Ireland’s temperate climate, despite it being at a similar latitude to southern Alaska.

He also co-chairs the ongoing AMOC in Focus assessment, which brings together leading scientists from across Europe, Canada, and the USA to assess the likelihood and risks of a potential disruption to the Atlantic Ocean’s circulation system and its associated implications for climate, ecosystems, people, and the economy.



Exaggeration of real ocean climate risks to ireland disrupts future planning, says Maynooth University oceanographer



The real climate risks to Ireland from changes to the Atlantic currents that sustain our mild climate are obscured by exaggerated claims in media headlines and movies.




Maynooth University

Dr Gerard McCarthy 

image: 

Dr Gerard McCarthy, oceanographer at the Irish Climate Analysis and Research UnitS (ICARUS) in the Department of Geography, Maynooth University

view more 

Credit: Maynooth University





The real climate risks to Ireland from changes to the Atlantic currents that sustain our mild climate are obscured by exaggerated claims in media headlines and movies.

That’s according to Dr Gerard McCarthy, a Maynooth University (MU) oceanographer at the Irish Climate Analysis and Research UnitS (ICARUS) in the Department of Geography, who has led a new article for Nature Climate Change.

The latest paper is a retrospective on a landmark 2015 study led by Professor Stefan Rahmstorf, which identified long-term Atlantic cooling as a sign that the Atlantic Meridional Circulation (AMOC) was weakening.

“The extreme climate collapse scenarios depicted in the Hollywood film, The Day After Tomorrow, and even in headlines of reputable mainstream media are often not grounded in scientific reality, but the genuine risks for Ireland are still significant and require proper planning,” said Dr McCarthy.

“It has happened that a new paper comes out, you get headlines saying the AMOC is going to collapse in the next few years. What we need to do is bring together a broader scientific voice to properly assess all the existing AMOC research literature, rather than having these seesawing headlines that concern and confuse our policymakers,” said Dr McCarthy.  

Dr McCarthy added, “the study led by Stefan Rahmstorf—one of the most influential studies of AMOC—used changes in sea surface temperature records stretching back over a century to build its case. The records show that the stretch of ocean lying between Ireland and Canada is the only region on Earth that has systematically cooled while almost everywhere else warmed.”

This retrospective paper - co-authored by Professor Hans-Otto Pörtner of the Alfred Wegener Institute in Bremerhaven – considered the questions raised by the Rahmstorf paper and highlighted the need for a clearer scientific consensus, setting the stage for a larger international research project called the AMOC in Focus assessment report, which Dr McCarthy is co-leading and is sponsored by JPI Ocean and JPI Climate.

This project is a 60-scientist, 14-country initiative aimed at producing authoritative, usable guidance for policymakers in Europe and around the world.

Regarding what AMOC changes mean for Ireland’s future, Dr McCarthy said it’s likely we will see relative cooling in the Atlantic.

“Cooling is not really what I’m worried about. What concerns me is changes in precipitation patterns and storminess. A weakening AMOC tightens the temperature gradient that fuels Atlantic storms, like a taut elastic band – and then more of those storms get catapulted towards Ireland. Ireland sits right at the end of this system. We are hugely dependent on the heat it transports, so we need a clear consensus voice, grounded in science, to plan properly,” said Dr McCarthy.

Dr McCarthy is an expert on AMOC; the system of ocean currents, sometimes known as the Gulf Stream System, that is critical to Ireland’s temperate climate, despite it being at a similar latitude to southern Alaska.

He also co-chairs the ongoing AMOC in Focus assessment, which brings together leading scientists from across Europe, Canada, and the USA to assess the likelihood and risks of a potential disruption to the Atlantic Ocean’s circulation system and its associated implications for climate, ecosystems, people, and the economy.

UPDATE

Argentina eases glacier protection in $40bn mining push despite environmental fears

Argentina eases glacier protection in $40bn mining push despite environmental fears
Argentina hosts nearly 17,000 glaciers covering about 8,484 square kilometres, and these formations play a critical role in regulating freshwater supplies. / CC / Vasiq Eqbal
By bnl editorial staff April 10, 2026

Argentina’s Congress has approved a reform to the country’s glacier protection law, relaxing restrictions on mining in high-altitude regions in a move aimed at attracting billions in investment, while drawing criticism from environmental groups concerned about water security.

Lawmakers on April 9 passed the bill with 137 votes in favour, 111 against and three abstentions, clearing the final legislative hurdle after Senate approval in February.

The measure, backed by President Javier Milei, modifies the 2010 Glacier Law to allow mining activity in certain periglacial zones previously off-limits.

The reform is expected to unlock significant capital flows into Argentina’s mining sector. Industry estimates suggest the new framework could attract more than $30bn in investment over the next decade, largely targeting copper, gold and silver projects, AP reported.

Local industry group CAEM, cited by Clarín, put the potential higher at about $40bn, with Economy Minister Luis Caputo projecting export revenues of up to $165bn by 2035.

Government officials and industry representatives argue the changes reduce regulatory uncertainty that had delayed large-scale projects. CAEM said the update “contributes to clarifying ambiguities that for years generated uncertainty,” while maintaining environmental protections. Mining Secretary Luis Lucero told local media that previous rules imposed “absolute prohibitions without room for exceptions or environmental impact studies,” discouraging investment.

Under the revised framework, only glaciers and landforms with a “specific hydrological function” will receive strict protection, with provincial governments tasked with defining and updating protected areas. 

Argentina is home to nearly 17,000 glaciers covering about 8,484 square kilometres, and these formations play a critical role in regulating freshwater supplies. Environmental groups, including Greenpeace, have vowed to challenge the law in court, warning it could threaten water access and fragile ecosystems.

“If they refuse to listen in Congress, they will be forced to listen in the courts,” a coalition of advocacy groups said in a joint statement, announcing plans for legal action.

Critics, including opposition lawmakers, have described the reform as unconstitutional and argued it weakens national safeguards.

Experts also raised concerns about long-term environmental risks. Enrique Viale, president of the Argentine Association of Environmental Lawyers, warned the changes could affect water resources relied upon by a large portion of the population, while analysts highlighted the technical challenges of mining in periglacial zones.

According to environmental groups cited by The Guardian, glaciers support 7mn Argentines, or 16% of the population. Beyond feeding rivers, they buffer fragile ecosystems already imperiled by climate change. In the north-west, scientists have measured a 17% shrinkage over the past 10 years.

Despite the backlash, government officials maintain the reform strikes a balance between environmental protection and economic development. Milei said the measure would help boost investment, job creation and growth, positioning Argentina to capitalise on rising global demand for critical minerals such as copper and lithium. The country hosts the world's third-largest lithium reserves (4mn tonnes, behind Chile and Australia) and the sixth-largest copper reserves (9.1mn tonnes), according to the US Geological Survey.

 

Two new studies could change critics’ opinions about how many birds die from wind turbines

How many birds die from wind turbines? Surprising results
Copyright AP Photo


By Diana Resnik
Published on 


Critics say wind turbines endanger birds but two new studies have now analysed the risk in more detail. What they have found could change the debate.

Two recent studies have re-examined the risk of birds entering in collision with rotor blades of wind turbines.

Study by Vattenfall and Spoor shows not a single collision

The energy company Vattenfall and the tech company Spoor have analysed the extent to which wind turbines endanger birds at the offshore wind farm in Aberdeen. Over a period of 19 months - from June 2023 to December 2024 - video recordings of a wind turbine were made with the help of AI-supported analyses. A total of 2,007 bird flight paths near the monitored turbine were examined.

"By combining AI-powered detection and detailed expert analysis, we can replace assumptions with concrete observations and measure actual behaviour in the immediate vicinity of wind turbines," says Ask Helseth, Chief Executive Officer and co-founder of Spoor.

The study found that there was not a single collision, "The results from Aberdeen Bay show that modern offshore wind farms can be operated with low risk to wildlife," says Dr Eva Julius-Philipp, Director Environment and Sustainability BU Wind at Vattenfall.

German Offshore Wind Energy Association (BWO) study: Over 99 per cent of migratory birds avoid wind turbines

A study by the German Offshore Wind Energy Association (BWO) also shows that migratory birds almost completely avoid wind turbines.

For one and a half years, researchers analysed over four million bird movements with the help of radar and AI-based cameras. The result showed that over 99.8 per cent of migratory birds reliably avoided the wind turbines.

"The new study shows that migratory birds avoid wind turbines. This confirms that the environmentally friendly expansion of offshore wind energy works in harmony with these birds and not against them," says BWO Managing Director Stefan Thimm.

"We used state-of-the-art methods. AI-controlled stereo cameras determined the flight activity in the rotor area, while a specialised bird radar recorded the migration patterns. By comparing the two data sets, we were able to precisely calculate avoidance rates," says Dr Jorg Welcker, Head of Research and Development at BioConsult SH GmbH & Co.

Conservationists nevertheless warn of risks

Despite the results, nature and animal protection organisations warn of the danger of wind turbines for many birds. The German Wildlife Foundation considers wind turbines to be an important tool for climate protection. Nevertheless, the organisation warns that wind turbines with their heavy rotor blades would threaten many native breeding bird species.

The German Wildlife Foundation expressly welcomes the expansion of renewable energies, but it must not be at the expense of species conservation. The urgency of biodiversity protection is in no way inferior to that of climate protection," says Dr Andreas Kinser, Head of Nature and Species Conservation at the German Wildlife Foundation.

In order to better protect birds, the study commissioned by the German Wildlife Foundation calls for clear minimum rules for nature conservation.

The most important basis for this is the so-called "Helgoland Paper" with recommendations from experts. It states, for example, that there should be a distance of at least 6,000 metres between the nest of a lesser spotted eagle and a wind turbine.

The study commissioned by the German Wildlife Foundation criticises the fact that the legal regulations for the protection of birds fall well short of the scientific recommendations.

The new studies suggest that many bird species collide with wind turbines less frequently than often feared. At the same time, the data situation has not yet been fully clarified. It therefore remains important to provide special protection for sensitive habitats during the further expansion of wind energy.