
06:21
Issued on: 02/06/2026
PRESS REVIEW – Tuesday, June 2: The European Union approves the creation of offshore "return hubs" to where failed asylum seekers could be sent. The British papers focus on a new trove of documents pertaining to Peter Mandelson, the former ambassador to the US. The Canadian province of Alberta will hold a referendum in October to decide on whether to vote on secession. Finally, researchers conclude that there is nothing foul about birds who masturbate.
The European Union has given its green light for the creation of detention hubs outside of Europe, to where they could send illegal migrants. Politico reports that the EU agreed on new rules to speed up and increase deportations from the bloc on Monday. These rules will be ratified in the coming weeks or months. This includes the creation of "return hubs" outside of Europe where failed asylum seekers could be sent. It is part of sweeping EU reforms to increase control over who enters the bloc and how.
The Belgian daily Le Soir evokes what it calls a compromise after multiple negotiations. It also reflects the growing importance of the right and far right in the EU Parliament. Under the agreement concluded on Monday, countries like Denmark, Austria or Germany could send illegal migrants to Rwanda, Uganda, or Uzbekistan – third countries to which they often have absolutely no connection. Spain has been a vehement opponent of this new legislation. The agreement reflects a harder line on the issue of migrants – at a time, Spanish daily El Pais reminds us, when Europe is preparing to receive a Taliban delegation to discuss future deportations to Afghanistan. The Washington Post sees the EU as moving to "deploy some of the same clenched fist tactics as the Trump administration": speeding up deportation, increasing detention times and tightening border controls.
The European Union on Monday agreed a deal to allow countries to send migrants ordered to leave the bloc to third-country "return hubs". The legislation, which still requires formal approval by EU governments and the European Parliament, has drawn criticism from human rights groups.
Issued on: 02/06/2026
By: FRANCE 24

European Union lawmakers and governments agreed on Monday on new rules allowing countries to deport migrants ordered to leave the bloc to centres in third countries, a move that has drawn sharp criticism from rights groups that warn it could enable abuses.
The deal is part of a broader tightening of EU migration policy amid pressure from right-wing parties, even as irregular arrivals fell 26 percent last year to their lowest level since 2021.
The legislation, which still requires formal approval by EU governments and the European Parliament, was proposed by the European Commission last year. The commission says it would streamline procedures and give governments more tools to deport people while respecting fundamental rights.
Rights groups dispute that assessment.
"This Regulation is going to create a draconian detention and deportation machine," said Silvia Carta, advocacy officer at the Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants (PICUM), a human rights organisation.
EU countries say they struggle to ensure that rejected asylum seekers and people who overstay their visas leave their territory. The commission says only about 20 percent of people ordered to leave currently depart.
Under the new rules, EU states would be able to establish so-called return hubs outside the bloc for people whose asylum claims have been rejected or who have been ordered to leave the EU. Deportees could be sent to hubs in countries they do not have connections to.
"With the new rules, we have more control over who can come to the EU, who can stay, and who needs to leave,” said European Commissioner Magnus Brunner.
Member states have not disclosed the potential host countries.
The draft legislation extends detention periods and introduces penalties, including entry bans, fines and possible criminal sanctions for non-cooperation.
Authorities would be allowed to seize belongings, detain minors, collect biometric data and search homes.
The deal also allows authorities to search migrants and "relevant premises", a term that rights groups criticise as being overly broad and enabling home raids.
Human rights activists and non-governmental organisations working with asylum seekers in the EU say some of the practices are already occurring and have increased in recent months, pointing to a rise in deportations of recognised refugees from Germany and other states to Greece and other EU border countries.
There, they say, in some cases authorities carry out night-time home searches to detain people and transfer them to detention centres or airports for deportation, sometimes without allowing them to gather their belongings.
Minos Mouzourakis, a lawyer and advocacy officer at Greece-based non-profit Refugee Support Aegean, warned the draft legislation amounted to “a recipe for extremely damaging and extremely dangerous practices” in Europe.
French Greens lawmaker Mélissa Camara said: "The legalisation of return hubs outside the European Union, the green light for the detention of minors, home visits inspired by (US) ICE practices: The legal arsenal serving a xenophobic ideology is now complete."
From rekindled love story to ICE 'nightmare': France calls on US to release 85-year-old
Some EU countries have already begun exploring such arrangements.
The Netherlands is working with Denmark, Germany, Greece and Austria to set up joint return and transit hubs, while bilateral talks with Uganda on a similar arrangement have been put on hold.
The Dutch government says it wants concrete steps by year-end, as it faces what Prime Minister Rob Jetten has called an “asylum crisis”.
Dutch reception centres are overcrowded – including the main registration hub Ter Apel, which has begun admitting only the most vulnerable – while anti-migration protests have emerged in areas hosting emergency shelters amid capacity shortages and a slow outflow of asylum seekers.
(FRANCE 24 with Reuters)
An international court on Monday rejected a claim by Rwanda for Britain to pay more than £100 million (€115million) it said London still owed from a scrapped deal to deport migrants.
Issued on: 01/06/2026 - RFI

Judges from the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in The Hague ruled that Britain was not liable for two years of outstanding costs from the scheme that was shelved in 2024.
In 2022, former UK prime minister Boris Johnson sealed a deal with Kigali to send to Rwanda migrants arriving in Britain via "dangerous or illegal journeys" in small boats or lorries.

But the scheme hit legal and political obstacles from the start, with the UK Supreme Court eventually ruling it illegal.
When Keir Starmer became British prime minister in July 2024, he declared the plan "dead and buried" on his first full day in office, dismissing it as a "gimmick".
Then interior minister Yvette Cooper called it "the most shocking waste of taxpayers' money I have ever seen".

During the two years before the scheme was scrapped, only four people actually went to Rwanda, all voluntarily, according to the current UK government.
According to the UK government website, about £290 million (€335 million) has already been paid to Rwanda, but Kigali argued in its pre-hearing submissions to the PCA that two annual payments of £50 million (€58 million) were still outstanding.
But the PCA, set up in 1899 to settle contractual disputes between nations, rejected by majority a £50 million (€58 million) claim for one year and unanimously rejected the same amount for the second.
The two nations are already at loggerheads after Britain slashed aid to Rwanda, accusing it of supporting M23 rebels in the neighbouring Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).
(With newswires)
Newleftreview.org



A fully functioning solid gold toilet, made by Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan, is going into public use at the Guggenheim Museum in New York on 15 September 2016. AFP - WILLIAM EDWARDS










