Thursday, August 14, 2025

 

Can extremely high-temperature weather forecast oil prices?




Higher Education Press
Fig 1 

image: 

Framework of our model.

view more 

Credit: Donglan ZHA , Shuo ZHANG , Yang CAO






1    Introduction

As crude oil becomes increasingly influenced by market dynamics, fluctuations in its price have a significant effect on the global economic and financial landscape (Naser, 2016). Accurate forecasts of crude oil prices play a crucial role in providing scientific support for energy-intensive enterprises and helping investors optimize their portfolios to effectively manage risks (Tian et al., 2023; Zhang and Wang, 2022).

To develop precise projections, it is essential to uncover the underlying factors driving fluctuations in crude oil prices. Previous research has indicated that the long-term trend of oil prices is determined by market supply and demand fundamentals (Dées et al., 2007; Hamilton, 2009), whereas short-term volatility may be affected by external factors such as stock performance (Bouri et al., 2022), exchange rates (Sun et al., 2022), and investor sentiment (Dai et al., 2022a). The increasing occurrence of extreme weather events in recent years has increased the vulnerability of oil products to climate-related risks (Cruz and Krausmann, 2013; Wen et al., 2021; Tumala et al., 2023), including the impact of global warming caused by the greenhouse effect (Kweku et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2024). The demand for crude oil and other fossil fuels tends to rise during periods of extreme hot weather (van Ruijven et al., 2019). Moreover, elevated temperatures can disrupt operations at drilling and refinery sites (Yalew et al., 2020; Qui et al., 2023) and pose challenges to the integrity of oil transportation infrastructure, such as pipelines (Izaguirre et al., 2021), potentially affecting the oil supply. Consequently, stakeholders in oil markets must consider extremely high temperatures when assessing market conditions and making pricing decisions. However, existing research on crude oil forecasting has not adequately considered extremely high weather conditions. Although recent studies have highlighted the importance of extreme weather information in predicting crude oil prices (Xu et al., 2023), their reliance on media reports introduces subjective bias. Microscale meteorological observations have the potential to provide oil market managers with precise weather information (Katopodis and Sfetsos, 2019). Our objective is to contribute additional empirical evidence regarding the relationship between extreme weather events and oil price forecasts by utilizing precise meteorological data from storage and supply locations in specific target oil markets.

There are two primary types of models used for forecasting oil prices. The first type consists of traditional statistical models, such as exponential smoothing (ES) (Azevedo and Campos, 2016; He, 2018), the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) (Xiang and Zhuang, 2013; Zhao and Wang, 2014), and vector autoregression (VAR) models (Baumeister and Kilian, 2014). However, these models face challenges in capturing the inherent nonlinearity in oil price dynamics (Gao and Lei, 2017). The second category of methodologies comprises emerging machine learning models (Zhao et al., 2017), which are primarily represented by support vector regression (SVR) (Wang et al., 2020), recurrent neural networks (RNNs) (Chaitanya Lahari et al., 2018), and long short-term memory (LSTM) models (Güleryüz and Özden, 2020). These models have advantages in characterizing the nonlinear relationship between influencing factors and crude oil prices, and they offer effective forecasting accuracy (Öztunç Kaymak and Kaymak, 2022). However, machine learning models are commonly perceived as enigmatic black boxes, as they present challenges in providing users with a comprehensive understanding of their predictive mechanisms.

The advent of explainable machine learning methods has offered a valuable tool for elucidating how factors drive predictive outcomes, and their application has expanded into research fields such as forecasting bitcoin prices (Goodell et al., 2023) and energy consumption (Aras and Hanifi Van, 2022). Nevertheless, these explainable methods have not yet been applied in crude oil price forecasting research.

Considering the aforementioned limitations, this research makes three significant contributions to the current literature. First, we develop an extremely high-temperature weather index (HTI) based on daily meteorological data specific to the crude oil production and storage sites of the China International Energy Exchange (INE). Unlike previous indices that broadly describe the frequency of extreme weather events on a global or national scale (Guo et al., 2023a) or those derived from textual reports on extreme weather attention (Xu et al., 2023), our HTI provides a finer scale to present extreme high-temperature weather information for INE crude oil price prediction.

Second, our study confirms that including the HTI as a predictive factor enhances the accuracy of INE crude oil futures price prediction in terms of errors and trend changes. In fact, the out-of-sample predictive contribution of the HTI even surpasses several common indicators, such as the stock market index, in most instances. As the HTI value increases, a corresponding rise in the predicted INE crude oil futures price is observed. Third, we introduce explainable methods to improve the credibility of machine learning models in the crude oil prediction process, overcoming the inherent deficiencies of previous black box models. This enables us to gain deeper insights into the correlation between varying degrees of extreme heat and crude oil price dynamics. The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 introduces the methodology. Section 3 describes the data. Section 4 presents our results. Finally, Section 5 provides concluding remarks.

See the article:

Can extremely high-temperature weather forecast oil prices?

https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-025-4075-5

 

Study finds traffic noise linked to depression and anxiety in young adults





University of Oulu, Finland





A new LongITools study, published in Environmental Research, has linked noise levels to depression and anxiety diagnoses. It is the first study of its kind to investigate long-term exposure to traffic noise and mental health in children, adolescents, and young adults.

The study, led by the University of Oulu, found that the risk of mental health disorders increases sharply when traffic noise at the home address is over 53 decibels (dB), the safe level recommended by the World Health Organization. This paper supports policy and planning actions designed to reduce traffic noise exposure, including placing bedrooms on quiet sides of buildings and lowering speed limits.

Background to the study

Environmental noise caused by various sources, including road, rail, airport traffic and construction, is the second biggest environmental health concern in Europe. Noise may affect human health in a variety of ways, including damage to the auditory system, sleep disturbance and additional cognitive and emotional responses, contributing to cardiovascular and neurological diseases. Recent evidence shows associations with mental disorders. However, the quality of available research evidence remains low.

Study methodology

We analysed data from 114,353 individuals born in Finland between 1987 and 1998, living in the Helsinki metropolitan area in 2007, using information from available Finnish registers. Researchers followed the individuals’ data for up to ten years from age 8 to 21, tracking how their health evolved.

To work out their exposure to high noise levels, annual average road and railway traffic noise was modelled at their residential address. This was then cross-referenced with those who had a diagnosis of depression and /or anxiety. By combining this data, researchers were able to build a picture of both the levels of noise an individual was exposed to and their evolving mental health.

Study findings

The World Health Organization sets 53 dB ‘Lden’ (the average sound level over a 24-hour period) as the recommended upper limit for traffic noise. This study confirmed that, at this level or above, there is a distinct increase in the risk of developing depression and anxiety in a young population.

“Our analysis showed that anxiety risk is lowest when traffic noise is around 45 to 50 dB at the quieter side of dwellings but increases significantly after 53 to 55 dB. Above 53 dB, noise becomes a significant psychological stressor for young people regardless of whether an individual sleeps on the quieter or noisier side of a dwelling," says Dr Anna Pulakka, senior author of the study.

The association with anxiety was stronger in males and individuals whose parents did not have mental health disorders.

Study recommendations

Yiyan He, the lead author of the study suggests: "Our findings support further actions towards reducing traffic noise exposure. For policymakers and urban planners, this should include measures such as ensuring bedrooms are on the quieter side of the dwelling and ensuring there is green space nearby. For transport, quieter tyres or reduced speed limits should also be considered."

This study demonstrates one of the many ways our exposome and the environment can affect our health.

Paper: Yiyan He, Sylvain Sebert, Anna Pulakka et al. Residential exposure to traffic noise and incidence of depression and anxiety from childhood through adulthood: a Finnish register study Environmental Research, Volume 285, Part 2, 2025.

 

Traffic noise linked to depression and anxiety in young adults - LongITools LongITools

 

Geological risk prediction under uncertainty in tunnel excavation using online learning and hidden Markov model



Higher Education Press
Geological Risk Forecasting Using an Online Hidden Markov Model 

image: 

Sparse early-stage data limits accurate geological risk assessment, increasing the chance of undetected hazards ahead of the TBM. By integrating borehole-derived information through an observation extension mechanism, the OHMM mitigates prediction uncertainty. Continuous online updating improves forward accuracy, enabling earlier hazard alerts. The trade-off lies in maximizing early-stage predictive resolution while minimizing dependence on extensive historical data.

view more 

Credit: Limao ZHANG1 , Ying WANG2 , Xianlei FU2 , Xieqing SONG1 , Penghui LIN2





Geological hazards such as collapses, water ingress, and landslides pose serious threats to tunnel construction, potentially leading to delays, cost overruns, and safety incidents. The challenge is compounded in the early stages of excavation, when detailed subsurface information is limited and conventional geological survey methods—whether invasive drilling or non-invasive geophysical techniques—offer only partial, sometimes inconsistent, insights.

A research team from Huazhong University of Science and Technology and Nanyang Technological University has developed a novel online hidden Markov model (OHMM) to tackle this uncertainty. By merging online learning capabilities with the probabilistic framework of hidden Markov models, the OHMM can continuously update its geological risk predictions as new in situ observations arrive, without waiting for lengthy data collection cycles.

One of the major innovations of the approach is an observation extension mechanism designed for the data-scarce early excavation stage. This mechanism integrates pre-construction borehole samples—often the only reliable geological data available before tunneling begins—into the OHMM framework. By intelligently extending short observation sequences to the length of a complete excavation dataset, the model preserves predictive accuracy even when historical data is minimal.

The researchers validated the method in a tunnel excavation project in Singapore, where geological conditions vary along the alignment. The OHMM produced high-resolution, ring-by-ring forecasts of geological risks ahead of the tunnel boring machine (TBM). Compared with traditional approaches—including standard hidden Markov models, neural networks, long short-term memory networks, and support vector machines—the OHMM consistently delivered superior accuracy, especially for forward predictions into yet-to-be-excavated regions.

The study revealed key operational benefits. First, the continuous model updating allowed for timely adaptation to changing geological patterns, enabling earlier hazard alerts. Second, by maximizing the utility of sparse borehole data, the method bridged the information gap between pre-construction investigations and ongoing excavation. Finally, the framework’s ability to operate effectively with minimal historical data made it particularly valuable for early-stage risk prediction, where proactive measures can prevent costly and dangerous incidents.

Beyond immediate tunneling applications, the researchers note that the OHMM framework could be extended to other infrastructure projects where geological uncertainty is high and observational data arrives incrementally—such as mining operations, slope stability monitoring, and underground storage development. The integration of machine learning with probabilistic risk modeling also opens the door for future enhancements, including coupling with real-time sensor networks and incorporating physical process models for improved interpretability.

By providing a dynamic, data-efficient, and forward-looking tool for geological risk prediction, the OHMM offers engineers and project managers a new way to safeguard tunneling operations, optimize construction schedules, and improve safety outcomes in complex subsurface environments.

 

See the article:

Geological risk prediction under uncertainty in tunnel excavation using online learning and hidden Markov model

https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-024-0082-1

Don’t throw away those Cannabis leaves – they're packed with rare compounds



Researchers from Stellenbosch University found first evidence of rare phenolic compounds in Cannabis leaves




Stellenbosch University

Chromatographic image of Cannabis compounds 

image: 

Two-dimensional liquid chromatographic separation of phenolics from Cannabis leaf and bud material, with each peak indicating a distinct compound present in the sample. An example structure of the newly discovered flavoalkaloids is shown on the top left.

view more 

Credit: Magriet Muller





Analytical chemists from Stellenbosch University (SU) have provided the first evidence of a rare class of phenolics, called flavoalkaloids, in Cannabis leaves.

Phenolic compounds, especially flavonoids, are well-known and sought after in the pharmaceutical industry because of their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-carcinogenic properties.

The researchers identified 79 phenolic compounds in three strains of Cannabis grown commercially in South Africa, of which 25 were reported for the first time in Cannabis. Sixteen of these compounds were tentatively identified as flavoalkaloids. Interestingly, the flavoalkaloids were mainly found in the leaves of only one of the strains. The results were published in the Journal of Chromatography A recently.

Dr Magriet Muller, an analytical chemist in the LC-MS laboratory of the Central Analytical Facility (CAF) at Stellenbosch University and first author on the paper, says the analysis of plant phenolics is challenging due to their low concentration and extreme structural diversity.

“Most plants contain highly complex mixtures of phenolic compounds, and while flavonoids occur widely in the plant kingdom, the flavoalkaloids are very rare in nature,” she explains.

“We know that Cannabis is extremely complex – it contains more than 750 metabolites – but we did not expect such high variation in phenolic profiles between only three strains, nor to detect so many compounds for the first time in the species. Especially the first evidence of flavoalkaloids in Cannabis was very exciting.”

For her postgraduate studies in SU’s Department of Chemistry and Polymer Science, she developed powerful analytical methods combining comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry for the detailed characterisation of phenolic compounds.

“We were looking for a new application for the methods that I developed, after successfully testing them on rooibos tea, grapes and wine. I then decided to apply the methods to Cannabis because I knew it was a complex sample, and that Cannabis phenolics have not been well characterised,” she explains.

According to Prof. André de Villiers, her study leader and main author on the paper, he was blown away by the chromatographic results that Muller obtained: “The excellent performance of two-dimensional liquid chromatography allowed separation of the flavoalkaloids from the much more abundant flavonoids, which is why we were able to detect these rare compounds for the first time in Cannabis”. He leads the analytical chemistry research group in SU’s Department of Chemistry and Polymer Science.

Prof. De Villiers says it is obvious there is still much to gain from studying Cannabis, as the bulk of research in this field to date has been focused on the pharmacological properties of the mood-effecting cannabinoids.

“Our analysis again highlights the medicinal potential of Cannabis plant material, currently regarded as waste. Cannabis exhibits a rich and unique non-cannabinoid phenolic profile, which could be relevant from a biomedical research perspective,” he concludes.

Dr Magriet Muller in front of a high-resolution mass spectrometer at the LC-MS laboratory in Stellenbosch University’s Central Analytical Facility, where part of the practical work was conducted.

Credit

Wiida Fourie-Basson



Dr Magriet Muller on methods used [AUDIO] | 


This is a short audio clip on how Dr Magriet Muller came about to test the methods she developed on Cannabis.


Dr Magriet Muller on finding the compounds in Cannabis [AUDIO


Short audio clip on the significance of finding so many, and such rare, compounds in Cannabis leaves.


 

Now you see me, now you don’t: how subtle ‘sponsored content’ on social media tricks us into viewing ads




Scientists find that people mostly avoid social media ads when they see them, but many ads blend in seamlessly




Frontiers





How many ads do you see on social media? It might be more than you realize. Scientists studying how ads work on Instagram-style social media have found that people are not as good at spotting them as they think. If people recognized ads, they usually ignored them - but some, designed to blend in with your friends’ posts, flew under the radar.

“We wanted to understand how ads are really experienced in daily scrolling — beyond what people say they notice, to what they actually process,” said Maike Hübner, PhD candidate at the University of Twente, corresponding author of the article in Frontiers in Psychology. “It’s not that people are worse at spotting ads. It’s that platforms have made ads better at blending in. We scroll on autopilot, and that’s when ads slip through. We may even engage with ads on purpose, because they’re designed to reflect the trends or products our friends are talking about and of course we want to keep up. That’s what makes them especially hard to resist.”

Learn more

The scientists wanted to test how much time people spent looking at sponsored versus organic posts, how they looked at different areas of these different posts, and how they behaved after realizing they were looking at sponsored content. They randomly assigned 152 participants, all of whom were regular Instagram users, to one of three mocked-up social media feeds, each of which was made up of 29 posts — eight ads and 21 organic posts. 

They were asked to imagine that the feed was their own and to scroll through it as they would normally. Using eye-tracking software, the scientists measured fixations — the number of times a participant’s gaze stopped on different features of a post — and dwell time, how long the fixations last. A low dwell time suggests that someone just noticed the feature, while a high dwell time might indicate they were paying attention. After each session, the scientists interviewed the participants about their experience.

Although people did notice disclosures when they were visible, the eye-tracking data suggested that participants paid more attention to calls to action — like a link to sign up for something — which could indicate that this is how they recognize ads. Participants were also quick to recognize an ad by the profile name or verification badge of a brand’s official account, or glossy visuals, which caused participants to express distrust. 

“People picked up on design details like logos, polished images, or 'shop now' buttons before they noticed an actual disclosure,” said Hübner. “On brand posts, that label is right under the username at the top, while on influencer content or reels, it might be hidden in a hashtag or buried in the ‘read more’ section.”

Although the scientists found that the ads often went unnoticed, if people realized that the content wasn’t organic, many of them stopped engaging with the post. Dwell time dropped immediately.

#ad

This was less likely to happen to ads that blended in better, with less polished visuals and a tone and format more typical of organic content. If ad cues like disclosures or call-to-action buttons weren’t noticed right away, they got similar levels of engagement to organic posts. 

“Many participants were shocked to learn how many ads they had missed. Some felt tricked, others didn’t mind — and that last group might be the most worrying,” said Hübner. “When we stop noticing or caring that something is an ad, the boundary between persuasion and information becomes very thin.”

The scientists say these findings show that transparency goes well beyond just labelling ads. Understanding how people really process ads should lead to a rethink of platform design and regulation to make sure that people know when they’re looking at advertising. 

However, this was a lab-based study with simulated feeds, and it’s possible that studies on different cultures, age groups, or types of social media might get different results. It’s also possible that ads are even harder to recognize under real-life conditions.

“Even in a neutral, non-personalized feed, participants struggled to tell ads apart from regular content,” Hübner pointed out. “In their own feeds which are shaped around their interests, habits, and social circles it might be even harder to spot ads, because they feel more familiar and trustworthy.”

Repeated exposure to an image – even if fake – increases its perceived credibility



New Tel Aviv University study highlights the risks of using AI in visual media:



Tel-Aviv University

Guy Grinfeld 

image: 

Guy Grinfeld

view more 

Credit: Tel Aviv University





Research team: “The findings raise concerns about the spread of false visual information on social media and its influence on public perception. If until now the proverb went, ‘A lie told often enough becomes the truth,’ our study shows that ‘An image seen often enough becomes reality.’”

 

A new international study led by a research team from Tel Aviv University has revealed that simply repeating an image, whether authentic or AI-generated, increases the likelihood that we will believe it is real.

 

The researchers found that repeated images are more likely to be believed as representing a real person, location, or an event than images seen for the first time—even when those images were entirely AI-generated. In other words, an image shared multiple times on social media is perceived as more credible, regardless of its authenticity.

 

The study was led by Guy Grinfeld, who is currently completing his doctorate at the School of Psychological Sciences Gershon H. Gordon Faculty of Social Sciences at Tel Aviv University. The research also involved scholars from Germany, Belgium, and Spain. The findings were published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, a prestigious scientific journal published by the American Psychological Association (APA).

 

Guy Grinfeld explains: “The study is based on a well-known psychological phenomenon called the ‘mere exposure effect,’ which suggests that information that we encounter repeatedly is perceived as more credible. In our research, we sought to examine whether this effect also applies in the visual domain — specifically with images created using artificial intelligence algorithms. This is the first study to demonstrate the mere exposure effect for images; until now, it had only been demonstrated for text. The findings raise concerns about the spread of false visual information on social media and its influence on public perception. As we like to summarize it, if until now the proverb went, ‘A lie told often enough becomes the truth,’ our study shows that ‘An image seen often enough becomes reality.’”

 

In the experiment, participants were shown a series of images that included both real photographs and images generated by AI. These images were shown again at a later stage in the study along with images shown for the first time, at which point participants were asked to judge whether the images depicted a real object or event. The result was clear: images that participants had seen before were rated as more credible than images shown for the first time — regardless of whether they were real or fake. Surprisingly, the repetition effect was even stronger among the skeptical participants—those who generally rated images as less credible. This suggests that people who tend to be cautious might rely more heavily on repetition as an indicator of truth.

 

Grinfeld concludes: “In the era of social networks and digital media, we are constantly and involuntarily exposed to visual information. Whereas in the past, it was easy to lie with words, today, AI tools make it just as easy to ‘lie’ with images. Our new study reveals a troubling mechanism: people attribute higher credibility to visual information that is repeated, regardless of its veracity. This creates a dangerous combination: repeated exposure to false information can make it seem credible, simply through repetition.

 

“The findings raise profound questions about how we process information, especially in an age of visual overload in social and news media. They also highlight the central challenge of our time: preserving truth and critical thinking in a world of dynamic, easily manipulated, and hard-to-discern visual content.”

 

Link to the article:

https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/2026-35632-001.html