Saturday, April 11, 2026


Ancient Survivor Reveals Its Secret: First-Ever Egg Of A Mammal Ancestor Discovered


Lystrosaurus embryo within its partially preserved shell , reconstruction of the animal 
CREDIT: Professor Julien Benoit Drawing - Sophie Vrard

April 11, 2026
By Eurasia Review


A remarkable new discovery is shedding light on one of the greatest survival stories in Earth’s history, and answering a decades-old scientific mystery. Lystrosaurus, a hardy, plant-eating mammal ancestor, rose to prominence in the wake of the End-Permian Mass Extinction some 252 million years ago, the most devastating extinction event our planet has ever experienced. While countless species vanished, Lystrosaurus not only survived, but thrived in a world marked by extreme environmental instability, intense heat, and prolonged droughts.

Now, groundbreaking research published in PLoS ONE reveals a discovery that transforms our understanding of this iconic survivor. An international team led by Professor Julien Benoit, Professor Jennifer Botha (Evolutionary Studies Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa), and Dr Vincent Fernandez (ESRF – The European Synchrotron, France) has identified, for the first time, an egg containing an embryo of Lystrosaurus, dating back approximately 250 million years. This extraordinary fossil represents the first-ever egg discovered from a mammal ancestor, finally answering a long-standing question: Did the ancestors of mammals lay eggs?

The answer is yes.

The researchers suggest these eggs were likely soft-shelled, explaining why they have remained elusive for so long. Unlike the hard, mineralized eggs of dinosaurs, which fossilize readily, soft-shelled eggs rarely preserve, making this find exceptionally rare. But the implications go far beyond reproduction.

“This fossil was discovered during a field excursion I led in 2008, nearly 17 years ago. My preparator and exceptional fossil finder, John Nyaphuli, identified a small nodule that at first revealed only tiny flecks of bone. As he carefully prepared the specimen, it became clear that it was a perfectly curled-up Lystrosaurus hatchling. I suspected even then that it had died within the egg, but at the time, we simply didn’t have the technology to confirm it,” says Professor Botha.

With the advent of advanced synchrotron x-ray CT and the bright X-rays of the ESRF, Professor Benoit and Dr Vincent Fernandez were finally able to unlock the last pieces of the puzzle. Dr Fernandez described the experience as particularly thrilling: “Understanding reproduction in mammal ancestors has been a long-lasting enigma and this fossil provides a key piece to this puzzle. It was essential that we scanned the fossil just right to capture the level of detail needed to resolve such tiny, delicate bones.”

The scans revealed a critical clue. “When I saw the incomplete mandibular symphysis, I was genuinely excited,” says Professor Benoit. “The mandible, the lower jaw, is made up of two halves that must fuse before the animal can feed. The fact that this fusion had not yet occurred shows that the individual would have been incapable of feeding itself.”

The study reveals that Lystrosaurus laid relatively large eggs for its body size. In modern animals, larger eggs typically contain more yolk, providing all the nutrients an embryo needs to develop independently, without parental feeding after hatching. This strongly suggests that Lystrosaurus did not produce milk for its young, unlike modern mammals. Large eggs also offer another crucial advantage: they are more resistant to drying out. In the harsh, drought-prone environment following the extinction, this would have been a critical survival trait. The findings further suggest that Lystrosaurus hatchlings were likely precocial, born at an advanced stage of development. These young animals would have been capable of feeding themselves, escaping predators, and reaching reproductive maturity quickly.

In other words, Lystrosaurus succeeded by living fast and reproducing early.

In a world on the brink, this strategy proved unstoppable. This discovery not only provides the first direct evidence of egg-laying in mammal ancestors but also offers a powerful explanation for how Lystrosaurus came to dominate post-extinction ecosystems. As scientists continue to uncover the biology of ancient survivors, one thing is becoming clear: resilience, adaptability, and reproductive strategy were key to enduring Earth’s darkest chapter, and Lystrosaurus mastered them all.
From the Researchers

“This research is important because it provides the first direct evidence that mammal ancestors, such as Lystrosaurus, laid eggs, resolving a long-standing question about the origins of mammalian reproduction. Beyond this fundamental insight, it reveals how reproductive strategies can shape survival in extreme environments: by producing large, yolk-rich eggs and precocial young, Lystrosaurus was able to thrive in the harsh, unpredictable conditions following the end-Permian mass extinction. In a modern context, this work is highly impactful because it offers a deep-time perspective on resilience and adaptability in the face of rapid climate change and ecological crisis. Understanding how past organisms survived global upheaval helps scientists better predict how species today might respond to ongoing environmental stress, making this discovery not just a breakthrough in palaeontology, but also highly relevant to current biodiversity and climate challenges” Julien Benoit explains. “The opportunity to work at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility alongside beamline scientists was also an unforgettable part of the journey. The cutting-edge data we generated there allowed us to “see” inside the fossil in extraordinary detail, ultimately revealing that the embryo was still at a pre-hatching stage. That moment, when the pieces all came together, was incredibly rewarding”.

“What makes this work especially exciting is that we were able to quite literally follow in John Nyaphuli’s footsteps, returning to a specimen he discovered nearly two decades ago and finally solve the puzzle he uncovered. At the time, all we had was a beautifully curled embryo, but no preserved eggshell to prove it had died within an egg. Using modern imaging techniques, we were able to answer that question definitively” says Jennifer Botha. “It is also thrilling because this discovery breaks entirely new ground. For over 150 years of South African palaeontology, no fossil had ever been conclusively identified as a therapsid egg. This is the first time we can say, with confidence, that mammal ancestors like Lystrosaurus laid eggs, making it a true milestone in the field”.

Ancient survivor reveals its secret: First-ever egg of a mammal ancestor discovered



250 million year old proto-mammal egg




University of the Witwatersrand

Lystrosaurus embryo within its partially preserved shell 

image: 

Lystrosaurus embryo within its partially preserved shell , reconstruction of the animal

view more 

Credit: Pictures - Professor Julien Benoit Drawing - Sophie Vrard





A remarkable new discovery is shedding light on one of the greatest survival stories in Earth’s history, and answering a decades-old scientific mystery. Lystrosaurus, a hardy, plant-eating mammal ancestor, rose to prominence in the wake of the End-Permian Mass Extinction some 252 million years ago, the most devastating extinction event our planet has ever experienced. While countless species vanished, Lystrosaurus not only survived, but thrived in a world marked by extreme environmental instability, intense heat, and prolonged droughts.

Now, groundbreaking research published in PLoS ONE reveals a discovery that transforms our understanding of this iconic survivor. An international team led by Professor Julien Benoit, Professor Jennifer Botha (Evolutionary Studies Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa), and Dr Vincent Fernandez (ESRF – The European Synchrotron, France) has identified, for the first time, an egg containing an embryo of Lystrosaurus, dating back approximately 250 million years. This extraordinary fossil represents the first-ever egg discovered from a mammal ancestor, finally answering a long-standing question: Did the ancestors of mammals lay eggs?

The answer is yes.

The researchers suggest these eggs were likely soft-shelled, explaining why they have remained elusive for so long. Unlike the hard, mineralized eggs of dinosaurs, which fossilize readily, soft-shelled eggs rarely preserve, making this find exceptionally rare. But the implications go far beyond reproduction.

“This fossil was discovered during a field excursion I led in 2008, nearly 17 years ago. My preparator and exceptional fossil finder, John Nyaphuli, identified a small nodule that at first revealed only tiny flecks of bone. As he carefully prepared the specimen, it became clear that it was a perfectly curled-up Lystrosaurus hatchling. I suspected even then that it had died within the egg, but at the time, we simply didn’t have the technology to confirm it,” says Professor Botha.

With the advent of advanced synchrotron x-ray CT and the bright X-rays of the ESRF, Professor Benoit and Dr Vincent Fernandez were finally able to unlock the last pieces of the puzzle. Dr Fernandez described the experience as particularly thrilling: “Understanding reproduction in mammal ancestors has been a long-lasting enigma and this fossil provides a key piece to this puzzle. It was essential that we scanned the fossil just right to capture the level of detail needed to resolve such tiny, delicate bones.”

The scans revealed a critical clue. “When I saw the incomplete mandibular symphysis, I was genuinely excited,” says Professor Benoit. “The mandible, the lower jaw, is made up of two halves that must fuse before the animal can feed. The fact that this fusion had not yet occurred shows that the individual would have been incapable of feeding itself.”

The study reveals that Lystrosaurus laid relatively large eggs for its body size. In modern animals, larger eggs typically contain more yolk, providing all the nutrients an embryo needs to develop independently, without parental feeding after hatching. This strongly suggests that Lystrosaurus did not produce milk for its young, unlike modern mammals. Large eggs also offer another crucial advantage: they are more resistant to drying out. In the harsh, drought-prone environment following the extinction, this would have been a critical survival trait. The findings further suggest that Lystrosaurus hatchlings were likely precocial, born at an advanced stage of development. These young animals would have been capable of feeding themselves, escaping predators, and reaching reproductive maturity quickly.

In other words, Lystrosaurus succeeded by living fast and reproducing early.

In a world on the brink, this strategy proved unstoppable. This discovery not only provides the first direct evidence of egg-laying in mammal ancestors but also offers a powerful explanation for how Lystrosaurus came to dominate post-extinction ecosystems. As scientists continue to uncover the biology of ancient survivors, one thing is becoming clear: resilience, adaptability, and reproductive strategy were key to enduring Earth’s darkest chapter, and Lystrosaurus mastered them all.

From the Researchers

“This research is important because it provides the first direct evidence that mammal ancestors, such as Lystrosaurus, laid eggs, resolving a long-standing question about the origins of mammalian reproduction. Beyond this fundamental insight, it reveals how reproductive strategies can shape survival in extreme environments: by producing large, yolk-rich eggs and precocial young, Lystrosaurus was able to thrive in the harsh, unpredictable conditions following the end-Permian mass extinction. In a modern context, this work is highly impactful because it offers a deep-time perspective on resilience and adaptability in the face of rapid climate change and ecological crisis. Understanding how past organisms survived global upheaval helps scientists better predict how species today might respond to ongoing environmental stress, making this discovery not just a breakthrough in palaeontology, but also highly relevant to current biodiversity and climate challenges” Julien Benoit explains. “The opportunity to work at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility alongside beamline scientists was also an unforgettable part of the journey. The cutting-edge data we generated there allowed us to “see” inside the fossil in extraordinary detail, ultimately revealing that the embryo was still at a pre-hatching stage. That moment, when the pieces all came together, was incredibly rewarding”.

“What makes this work especially exciting is that we were able to quite literally follow in John Nyaphuli’s footsteps, returning to a specimen he discovered nearly two decades ago and finally solve the puzzle he uncovered. At the time, all we had was a beautifully curled embryo, but no preserved eggshell to prove it had died within an egg. Using modern imaging techniques, we were able to answer that question definitively” says Jennifer Botha. “It is also thrilling because this discovery breaks entirely new ground. For over 150 years of South African palaeontology, no fossil had ever been conclusively identified as a therapsid egg. This is the first time we can say, with confidence, that mammal ancestors like Lystrosaurus laid eggs, making it a true milestone in the field”.

  

Egg photographed in the control room of the ESRF in France

Credit

Professor Julien Benoit


3D reconstruction of the skeleton

Credit

Professor Julien Benoit

 

Could your housemates be changing your gut bacteria?




University of East Anglia

Seychelles warbler 

image: 

Research on a colony Seychelles warblers (pictured) reveals they share more of their gut bacteria with the birds they spend the most time with.

view more 

Credit: Claire Lok Sze Tsui, University of East Anglia




Living with friends may quietly be altering your gut bacteria - according to a new study from the University of East Anglia.

Research on a colony of tiny island birds reveals they share more of their gut bacteria with the birds they spend the most time with.

And the team say the same principle almost certainly applies to humans too.

Previous human studies have hinted at this phenomenon - with spouses and long‑term cohabitees often having more similar gut microbiomes than strangers, even when their diets differ.

But the new bird research provides unusually clear evidence of how social closeness itself - not just shared environment - drives the exchange of gut bacteria.


How the research happened

Researchers studied the Seychelles warbler, a small songbird found on Cousin Island in the Seychelles.

They collected faecal samples from the warblers, which were then used to analyse the birds’ gut microbiomes - the diverse communities of ‘good’ bacteria living in their digestive systems.

Dr Chuen Zhang Lee, from UEA’s School of Biological Sciences, carried out the work as part of his PhD project.

He said: “To uncover how gut bacteria spreads between social partners, we meticulously collected the birds’ poo over several years. We gathered hundreds of samples from birds with known social roles - breeding pairs, helpers and non‑helpers living in the same group, and in different groups.

“This allowed us to compare the gut bacteria of birds that interacted closely at the nest versus those that did not.

“We studied their anaerobic gut bacteria, which thrive without oxygen.

“And it gave us a rare insight into how social bonds can drive the transmission of gut microbes.”


A natural laboratory in the Indian Ocean

Senior researcher Prof David S Richardson, from UEA’s School of Biological Sciences, said: “Cousin Island is small, isolated, and the warblers never leave it. That means every bird on the island can be individually marked and followed throughout its life.

“This offers scientists an exceptional opportunity to study life-long biological processes in the wild.”

All of the island’s warblers are fitted with coloured leg rings, allowing researchers to track their behaviour, health, and genetics over many years. This creates conditions similar to a laboratory population - but in a completely natural setting.

“It gives us the best of both worlds,” said Prof Richardson. “We can study animals living natural lives, with natural diets and gut bacteria, while still being able to collect detailed data from known individuals.”

Sharing gut microbiota with friends

“We found that the more social you are with another individual, the more you share similar anaerobic gut bacteria,” said Dr Lee.

“Birds who spent a lot of time together at the nest – breeding couples and their devoted helpers – shared a lot of this type of gut bacteria, which can only spread through direct, close contact.

“These anaerobic microbes can’t survive in the open air, so they don’t drift around in the environment. Instead, they move between individuals through intimate interactions and shared nests.”

How home life shapes our microbiomes

The team say that the findings shine a spotlight on what may be happening in human homes.

“Whether you’re living with a partner, housemate, or family, your daily interactions - from hugging, kissing and sharing food prep spaces - may encourage the exchange of gut microbes,” said Dr Lee.

“Anaerobic bacteria are some of the most important for digestion, immunity and overall health.

“Once inside the gut, they thrive in oxygen‑free conditions and often form stable, long‑term colonies.

“That means the people you live with might subtly shape the microscopic ecosystem inside you.

“Translated into human terms, this means that cosy nights in, shared washing‑up duties, and even sitting close on the sofa may bring your microbiomes quietly closer together.

“Sharing beneficial anaerobic bacteria could strengthen immunity and improve digestive health across a household,” he added.

This research was led by UEA in collaboration with Norwich Research Park colleagues at the Centre for Microbial Interactions, the Quadram Institute and the Earlham Institute, as well as the University of Sheffield, the University of Groningen (The Netherlands) and Nature Seychelles.

‘Social structure and interactions differentially shape aerotolerant and anaerobic gut microbiomes in a cooperative breeding species’ is published in the journal Molecular Ecology.


ENDS

 

Seabirds reveal global mercury distribution in oceans


The analysis was based on blood samples from over 11,000 seabirds, the first biologically derived estimate of oceanic mercury distribution.



Nagoya University

Mercury concentrations in seabirds 

image: 

This study provides the drivers of variation in mercury concentrations in seabirds and, further, the first biologically based estimate of oceanic mercury distribution, analyzing blood mercury levels in more than 11,215 seabirds from 108 species, including 659 newly collected samples and over 10,556 from prior research. (THg: total mercury)

view more 

Credit: Jumpei Okado (modified from Okado et al. 2026, licensed under CC BY 4.0)




Mercury released into the oceans affects marine environments worldwide. Traditionally, its distribution and quantity have been estimated using marine biogeochemical simulation models.

A recent international study led by Japanese researchers analyzed blood mercury concentrations in more than 11,215 seabirds from 108 species, of which 659 were newly collected samples and over 10,556 were from previous studies. This is the first biologically based estimate of oceanic mercury distribution.

The study found that mercury levels in seabirds vary according to prey trophic level, bird body weight, and foraging depth. The findings were published in Science of the Total Environment.

Mercury emissions into the ocean have risen since the Industrial Revolution, primarily due to increased atmospheric mercury from coal combustion. Mercury travels long distances by wind and enters the ocean through rainfall.

In the ocean, some mercury becomes highly toxic and bioaccumulates in the food chain, ultimately concentrating in the tissues of seabirds that consume fish and zooplankton.

Professor Akiko Shoji and Researcher Jumpei Okado of Nagoya University Graduate School of Environmental Studies, along with Senior Researcher Bungo Nishizawa of the Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency, led an international study with 12 institutions from four countries.

Why were seabird blood samples used?

Blood samples from seabirds are efficiently collected when they come ashore for breeding. Mercury concentrations in adult birds' blood at breeding sites reflect their dietary mercury intake from specific ocean areas within the two months prior to sampling.

This method enables a more accurate correlation of mercury levels with specific times and locations than other sample types. Additionally, blood collection causes minimal harm to the birds.

Analysis of seabird blood data

Between 2017 and 2024, researchers collected blood samples from 659 individuals representing 10 seabird species at breeding sites in Japan, Alaska, and New Zealand. They dried and homogenized the samples, then measured total mercury concentrations using atomic absorption spectrometry. Results were standardized to total mercury per gram of dry weight in whole blood for comparison.

Researchers also conducted a systematic review of 106 publications from 1980 to 2025, with over 80% published after 2010, and analyzed data on more than 10,556 adults representing 105 seabird species.

In total, the team analyzed blood mercury concentrations in over 11,215 individuals from 108 seabird species worldwide, covering diverse diets and geographic regions.

The analysis found that seabirds at higher trophic levels, with larger body mass, and those feeding on prey from depths between 200 and 1,000 meters have higher mercury levels.

Statistical analysis showed distinct regional patterns in oceanic mercury contamination. Mercury levels were higher in the North Atlantic, North Pacific, South Pacific below 40 degrees south, and in areas with low productivity, as indicated by reduced chlorophyll a levels. In contrast, mercury levels were much lower in the South Atlantic and Southern Oceans.

The study also found that albatrosses and shearwaters are more exposed to mercury than other seabird species.

Significance and future perspectives

The researchers found that predictions from the seabird-based model and the marine biogeochemical simulation models were only weakly correlated.

"The seabird model is based on empirical measurements from organisms and is therefore considered more reliable than values from marine simulation models," said Shoji. "Seabirds live in diverse environments, from coastal and tropical zones to polar regions. Their varied feeding patterns make them effective indicators of global ocean health."  

This approach offers a promising method to monitor and verify the effectiveness of international mercury emission regulations, such as the Minamata Convention, and to support stronger global efforts to reduce mercury contamination in marine ecosystems.

 

Funding information:

This study was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research awarded to AS: 23KK0116, 22K21355, and 19KK0159), Japan Science and Technology Agency (EXPLORATORY RESEARCH GRANT awarded to AS: JPMJFR241E), and Japan Polar Research Association (2022 and 2023 awarded to CN). Sample collection in Aotearoa New Zealand was supported by the Conservation Services Programme of the Department of Conservation (POP2022–08, POP20220–7, and POP2022–10), the National Geographic Society (WW-249C-17), the Mohamed Bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund (Project 192520234), and Birds New Zealand (Birds NZ Research fund 2017, 2019).



 

 

Drowned chicks and food scarcity: Emperor penguin and Antarctic fur seal now endangered

The primary drivers are shrinking sea ice and warming oceans driven by climate change.
Copyright Martin Wettstein

By Rebecca Ann Hughes
Published on 

The primary drivers are shrinking sea ice and warming oceans driven by climate change.

The emperor penguin and Antarctic fur seal have been reclassified as ‘Endangered’ on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species.

Climate change in Antarctica is leading to changes in sea ice that are projected to halve the emperor penguin population by the 2080s, while reduced food availability has already driven a 50 per cent reduction in the Antarctic fur seal population since 2000.

“As countries prepare to gather at the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting in May, these assessments provide essential data to inform decisions regarding this majestic continent and its awe-inspiring wildlife,” says Dr Grethel Aguilar, IUCN Director General.

“Antarctica’s role as our planet’s 'frozen guardian' is irreplaceable – offering untold benefits to humans, stabilising the climate and providing refuge to unique wildlife.”

Climate change brings bigger risk of penguin chicks drowning

The emperor penguin has moved from Near Threatened to Endangered on the IUCN Red List, based on projections that its population will halve by the 2080s.

Satellite images indicate a loss of around 10 per cent of the population between 2009 and 2018 alone, equating to more than 20,000 adult penguins.

The primary driver is the early breakup and loss of sea ice, the IUCN says, which has reached record lows since 2016.

Emperor penguins require fast ice – sea ice that is “fastened” to the coastline, ocean floor or grounded icebergs – as habitat for their chicks and during their moulting season, when they are not waterproof.

If the ice breaks up too early, the result can be deadly.

It is challenging to convert observed tragedies – such as the collapse of a breeding colony into the sea before the chicks can swim – into population changes.

But population modelling considering a wide range of future climate scenarios shows that without abrupt and dramatic reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, emperor penguin populations will rapidly decline during this century.

Penguins are already among the most threatened birds on Earth,” says Martin Harper, CEO of BirdLife International, which coordinated the emperor penguin assessment as the authority for birds on the IUCN Red List.

“The emperor penguin’s move to Endangered is a stark warning: climate change is accelerating the extinction crisis before our eyes. Governments must act now to urgently decarbonise our economies.”

Rising ocean temperatures reduce food for Antarctic fur seals

The Antarctic fur seal has moved from Least Concern to Endangered on the IUCN Red List.

Its population has decreased by more than 50 per cent from an estimated 2,187,000 mature seals in 1999 to 944,000 in 2025.

IUCN says the ongoing decline is due to climate change, as rising ocean temperatures and shrinking sea ice are pushing krill to greater ocean depths in search of colder water, reducing the availability of food for seals.

Krill shortages at South Georgia have reduced the survival of pups in their first year dramatically, leading to an ageing breeding population.

Other threats, such as predation by killer whales and leopard seals and competition with recovering baleen whale populations targeting the same krill, are potentially also impacting this declining population.

Avian flu threatens elephant seals

The southern elephant seal has also been reclassified, moving from Least Concern to Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List following declines caused by Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI).

There has been a significant increase in the prevalence of avian flu around the world since 2020, and it has spread to mammals. The disease has affected four of the five major subpopulations, killing more than 90 per cent of newborn pups in some colonies and seriously impacting adult females, which spend more time on the beaches than males.

There is growing concern that disease-related mortalities of marine mammals will increase with global warming – particularly in polar regions, where animals have not had much previous exposure to pathogens.

Animals that live close together in colonies, such as southern elephant seals, are particularly hard-hit by diseases.



Trump repeats falsehoods claiming he predicted 9/11 and demanded Bin Laden's death



Issued on: 07/04/2026 
05:34 min

During a press conference on Monday about the war in Iran, US President Donald Trump made a series of false claims about Washington’s progress in the conflict, his own past foreign policy, and that his book released in 2000 predicted 9/11.

After correctly mentioning three US fighter planes had been mistakenly shot down by Kuwait at the start of the war, Trump immediately claimed the “only planes” Washington had lost were as a result of “friendly fire”. Considering the very objective of this press conference was the rescue of two air personnel whose planes had been shot down by Iran, it was a direct contradiction to the focus of his briefing.

After discussing his first term actions in Iran, and the killing of General Qassem Soleimani, Trump repeated a long-debunked claim that he had not only predicted the September 11, 2001, terror attacks in the book he had released a year earlier, but that he pushed for the killing of Osama bin Laden.

His book shows no evidence that suppors either claim. In fact, bin Laden is only mentioned once in passing.

He also exaggerated or repeated falsehoods about his own foreign policy successes: including that he had "ended eight wars."

Vedika Bahl fact-checks Trump’s assertions in Truth or Fake.
VIDEO BY: Vedika BAHL


UK shelves Chagos Islands handover after Trump criticism


The United Kingdom announced on Saturday that it was suspending its plan to return the Chagos Archipelago to Mauritius due to a lack of “support” from the United States. Britain evicted around 2,000 Chagos islanders after it bought the remote Indian Ocean archipelago in 1965, and it currently hosts a strategic US-UK military base.

11/04/2026 - 
By: FRANCE 24


This file image released by the US Navy shows an aerial view of Diego Garcia, the largest island of the Chagos Archipelago. © US Navy via AP

Britain has shelved plans to hand over the Chagos Islands to Mauritius after strong opposition from US President Donald Trump who has previously described the move "an act of great stupidity".

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s Downing Street office said the deal would proceed only "if it has US support", after reports the Chagos legislation risked running out of parliamentary time with no fresh bill planned.

The remote Indian Ocean archipelago – whose main island is Diego Garcia – was bought by Britain in 1965 before Mauritius gained independence. Following the purchase, the local population was expelled and Britain leased the territory to the United States for what became one of its most strategic military bases.

Britain's ownership was disputed for years, with the United Nations ruling in 2019 that the UK should hand back the roughly 55 islands and atolls.

Mass eviction

In 1965, Britain separated the Chagos Islands from the rest of Mauritius, then a semi-autonomous British territory, and paid three million pounds to acquire them, the equivalent of around $65 million today.

When Mauritius became independent three years later, the islands remained under British control and were renamed the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT).

Chagos islands dispute: HRW condemns UK, US actions on archipelago
01:47



In 1966, Britain leased the islands to the US for 50 years so that it could set up a military base. In 2016, the deal was extended to 2036.

Between 1968 and 1973, around 2,000 Chagos islanders were evicted, described in a British diplomatic cable at the time as the removal of a few "Tarzans and Man Fridays". Most were shipped to Mauritius and the Seychelles.

Mauritius argued it was illegal for Britain to break up its territory and demanded the right to resettle the former residents.
Strategic military base

The US military base on Diego Garcia, the largest island, took a major strategic role in the Cold War.

It offered proximity to Asia as an assertive Soviet navy was extending communist influence in the Indian Ocean.
Chagos Islands © Lise Kiennemann, Valentina Breschi, AFP


After the 1979 revolution that swept Iran, the US expanded the base to receive more warships and heavy bombers.

It later served as a staging ground for US bombing campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq, and was used recently to launch B-2 bomber attacks on Houthi rebels in Yemen during the Gaza war.
Islands returned

Britain signed a deal with Mauritius in May 2025 to return the islands, while paying to lease Diego Garcia for $136 million annually for 99 years, which London said would secure the use of the military base.

It follows decades of legal wrangling dating back to 1975 when Chagos islanders living in Mauritius launched legal proceedings against their expulsion, resulting in a 1982 payment of four million pounds in compensation along with land valued at one million pounds.

In 2007, a British appeals court paved the way for Chagossians to return home but its decision was annulled by the upper branch of parliament, the House of Lords, the following year.

In 2016, the British government confirmed its opposition to the resettlement of Chagossians, including for reasons of defence, security and cost.

Today, around 10,000 Chagossians and their descendants are divided between Mauritius, the Seychelles and Britain.
ICJ ruling

In 2010, Britain declared the islands part of a Marine Protected Area, arguing that people should not be permitted to live there.

Diplomatic cables revealed by WikiLeaks quoted a British official as saying the plan "put paid to the resettlement claims of the archipelago's former residents".

The move backfired as a UN arbitration tribunal declared it illegal in 2015. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) stated in 2019 that Britain had illegally split the islands and should relinquish control.

Britain rejected the ruling, insisting that Mauritius was wrong to bring the case to court, and arguing the Diego Garcia base played a "vital role" in keeping the region safe.

Later that year, a UN General Assembly resolution demanded Britain cede the islands.
Colonial history

Located several hundred kilometres south of the Maldives, the Chagos Islands were colonised by France in the 18th century and African slaves were shipped in to cultivate coconuts and copra.

In 1814, France was made to cede the islands to Britain, which in 1903 merged them with Mauritius, its colony around 2,000 kilometres to the southwest.

After the abolition of slavery in 1834, Indian workers arrived and mixed with the first settlers.

Only three of the islands were inhabited: Diego Garcia, Salomon and Peros Banhos.

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)