Tuesday, December 20, 2022

UK's nursing staff stages second walkout over pay

Tens of thousands of members of the RCN in England, Wales and Northern Ireland are holding the latest one-day stoppage after walking out last Thursday demanding an inflation-busting pay rise.
RCN chief Pat Cullen said nurses would take wider industrial action next month if the dispute was not resolved. (AP)

UK nurses have staged a second unprecedented strike amid an increasingly acrimonious fight with the government for better wages and warnings that patient safety could be jeopardised.

Up to 100,000 members of the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) in England, Wales and Northern Ireland are holding the latest one-day stoppage Tuesday after walking out last Thursday for the first time in the union's 106-year history.

They are demanding an inflation-busting pay increase to make up for years of real-terms salary cuts, but the government insists recession-hit Britain cannot afford anything above a roughly 4-5 percent rise.

"We need more money, we need more staff, we need patient safety," said Lucy Savage, 21, on a picket line outside Aintree University Hospital in the northwestern city of Liverpool.

"We're overworked and underpaid, the National Health Service (NHS) is just a shambles."

Suni George, 45, said his pay had hardly changed in his 17 years working as a nurse.

"We get a lot of tax so even when the annual income looks like it's gone up, we don't have more money," he said outside the same hospital.


Decades-high inflation


The striking nurses are just some of numerous UK public and private sector workers taking industrial action over pay and working conditions, as they grapple with a cost-of-living crisis worsened by decades-high inflation.

The UK consumer prices index is currently running at nearly 11 percent.

Ambulance workers, including paramedics and call handlers, are set to strike on Wednesday.

'Unaffordable', the RCN has criticised Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's government for refusing to discuss pay as part of stalled negotiations.

RCN chief Pat Cullen said nurses would take wider industrial action next month if the dispute was not resolved.

"If this government keeps giving our nursing staff the cold shoulder as they have to date then, it's really unfortunate, that come January, we will see more hospitals being involved and striking and that means more nursing staff involved," she said.

'Challenging times'

"The RCN's demands are unaffordable during these challenging times and would take money away from frontline services while they are still recovering from the impact of the pandemic," said Health Secretary Steve Barclay.

The government-appointed independent pay review body, comprised of economists and human resources experts, urged hiking healthcare sector pay at least £1,400 ($1,740) on top of a 3.0 percent increase last year.

On the eve of the nurses' latest strike, he insisted the government has adopted a "responsible and fair approach" to public sector pay.

"When it comes to pay, it's because these things are difficult that we have an independent process," Barclay said while on a visit to Latvia.




READ MORE: Thousands of UK nurses on day-long strike for better wages

Source: TRT World and agencies


Nurses to begin second day of strikes as union leader tells Rishi Sunak to 'listen' or risk further industrial action

Ahead of the second day of nursing strikes, RCN general secretary and chief executive, Pat Cullen warned Rishi Sunak to "listen to people around him" or face continued strikes next year.


Sophie Morris
SKY NEWS
Political reporter @itssophiemorris
Tuesday 20 December 2022 
Members of the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) on the picket line in London last Thursday

Members of the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) will stage their second walkout across England, Wales and Northern Ireland today - as Health Secretary Steve Barclay is set to hold crisis talks with ambulance worker unions on emergency strike cover.

Tens of thousands of nurses took part in the first day of strike action last Thursday in their first mass walkout in a century.

The industrial action, a bid to secure above-inflation pay rises, will proceed again today after no breakthrough was found between the government and the Royal College of Nursing (RCN).

Picket lines are expected to be in place at dozens of hospitals and thousands of NHS appointments and operations are set to be cancelled, with the health service running a bank holiday-style service in many areas.

The RCN has said it will still staff chemotherapy, emergency cancer services, dialysis, critical care units, neonatal and paediatric intensive care.

When it comes to adult A&E and urgent care, nurses will work Christmas Day-style rotas.


The government has accepted recommendations made by the NHS Pay Review Body (PRB) to give nurses below inflation pay rises of around 4%.

The RCN has been calling for a pay rise of 19.2% - 5% above inflation - though it has indicated it would accept a lower offer.

Health Minister Will Quince told Sky News his and the health secretary's doors "are open when it comes to discussing issues around patient safety and working conditions for staff".

"What we are not willing to negotiate is reopening the pay for this year, which is part of the independent pay review body recommendations, which the government accepted in full," he added.

Mr Quince said we are three-quarters of the way through the year and the pay review bodies are now looking at pay recommendations for next year, from April.

Ahead of the second day of nursing strikes, RCN general secretary and chief executive, Pat Cullen warned Rishi Sunak to "listen to people around him" or face continued strikes next year.

"The prime minister should ask himself what is motivating nursing staff to stand outside their hospitals for a second day so close to Christmas," she said.

"They are prepared to sacrifice a day's pay to have their concerns heard. Their determination stems as much from worries over patient safety and the future of the NHS than personal hardship.

"Rishi Sunak is under growing pressure in Westminster following last Thursday's strike and he should listen to people around him.

Read more: Health Secretary Steve Barclay challenged by mother during hospital visit



Nurses striking with reluctance

"The public is increasingly with their local nursing staff and this government desperately needs to get on the right side of them. It is unprecedented for my members to strike.

"Let's get this wrapped up by Christmas. I will negotiate with him at any point to stop nursing staff and patients going into the new year facing such uncertainty.

"But if this government isn't prepared to do the right thing, we'll have no choice but to continue in January and that will be deeply regrettable."

Read More: How strike will impact A&E and other NHS services - and which hospitals are affected

When the RCN submitted the 5% figure to the independent pay review body in March, inflation was running at 7.5%.

But inflation has since soared, with RPI standing at 14.2% in September.

The health secretary reiterated that the RCN's demands are "unaffordable".



PM urges nurses to rethink strikes

"I hugely value the work of our NHS staff and it is disappointing some union members are going ahead with further strike action when we know the impact this has on patients," he said.

"My number one priority remains keeping patients as safe as possible and I've been working closely with the NHS and across government to protect safe staffing levels.

"The NHS remains open, patients should continue to come forward for emergency and urgent medical care. They should also continue to turn up to appointments unless they have been contacted by the NHS.

"The RCN's demands are unaffordable during these challenging times and would take money away from frontline services while they are still recovering from the impact of the pandemic.

"I'm open to engaging with the unions on how to make the NHS a better place to work."

Meanwhile, Mr Barclay is due to meet with members of Unite, Unison and GMB unions this afternoon to get assurances from union officials that Category 2 incidents - such as strokes or cases of serious chest pain - will be attended to during industrial action.

Sources say the health secretary will not discuss increasing wages during the fresh talks.

Ambulance workers are due to strike on 21 and 28 December.



Nurses pay has 'fallen off a cliff'

The UK is facing a wave of strikes this winter, with at least one walkout a day ahead of Christmas, as staff from different industries seek better pay.

Read more: Who are striking on what day?

From transport to the NHS, education to delivery drivers, tens of thousands of workers are taking action as recession grips the UK and the cost of living rises.

Mr Sunak will be probed on the continued strike chaos when he makes his debut appearance at the Liaison Committee on the last day of the parliamentary term this afternoon.

He will face questions from chairs of the parliamentary committees on global issues, the UK's place in the world and economic issues - including the cost of living.


Nurses to strike as ambulance crews plan walkouts

Nurses in England, Wales and Northern Ireland first walked out last week in the largest action of its kind

By Michelle Roberts
Digital health editor

About 10,000 NHS nurses in England, Wales and Northern Ireland are to strike for the second time in less than a week in protest over their pay.

Wednesday will see ambulance staff in England and Wales walk out too, unless a meeting later with the health secretary can avert it.

Steve Barclay has invited three unions representing paramedics to talks.

It follows warnings of extensive disruption to services at a very challenging time of year for the NHS.

The joint letter was sent out by health chiefs to NHS trusts and integrated care boards in England, urging hospitals to free-up beds by safely discharging patients ahead of industrial action by ambulance crews.

Measures should also be put in place to make sure ambulance patient handovers are kept to no more than 15 minutes, it advises.

The health secretary will meet with ambulance unions later today, but will be discussing staffing measures rather than the issue of pay.

There is no sign that ministers will adjust their stance over pay, the BBC's Nick Eardley said. The prime minister has told the Daily Mail he will keep making same argument that the current offer is fair and reasonable.

"I really urge the unions to consider the impact these strikes are having on people's lives and their health and to consider whether that's really appropriate," he said.

Nurses staged their biggest ever strike in the history of the NHS last week.

Nearly 10,000 staff were absent on Thursday and 16,000 appointments and surgeries had to be rescheduled in England alone.

Tuesday's 12-hour walkout, which starts at 08:00 GMT, could cause similar disruption, although services such as urgent cancer care, will continue.

The strike involves nurses in about a quarter of hospitals and community teams in England, all health boards in Northern Ireland and all but one health board in Wales. Nurses are not striking in Scotland.

Protected services include chemotherapy, emergency cancer services, dialysis, critical care units, neonatal and paediatric intensive care, along with some areas of mental health and learning disability and autism services.

What will nurses' strike mean for patients?

Why are the strikes happening?

The walkout is mostly about pay.

In England and Wales, most NHS staff have already received a pay rise of roughly £1,400 this year - worth about 4%, on average, for nurses.

The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) union wants a 19% pay rise- 5% above the RPI inflation rate which currently stands at 14% - saying its members have received years of below-inflation pay increases.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has said the pay offer to nurses is appropriate and fair, despite pressure from health leaders and some former Conservative ministers to rethink.

But RCN general secretary Pat Cullen said he should ask himself why nurses are about to strike for the second time in their history.

Calling for talks with Mr Sunak, Ms Cullen said: "Let's get this wrapped up by Christmas.

"I will negotiate with him at any point to stop nursing staff and patients going into the New Year facing such uncertainty."

If there was no deal there would be more strikes next year, with more staff and further hospitals included, she warned on Radio 4's Today.

Ms Cullen said she was "truly sorry" for every patient whose care had been disrupted because of the nursing strikes.

However, she added that any disruption to a health service "that's as fragile as ours" is something that this government "really needs to take a long, hard look at".

The government maintains the nurses' demands are unaffordable and the recommendation of an independent pay review body in setting wages have been followed.

Health Secretary Steve Barclay said it was "disappointing" union members were striking despite the impact on patients.

"The RCN's demands are unaffordable during these challenging times and would take money away from frontline services while they are still recovering from the impact of the pandemic," he said.

He added that he was "open to engaging with the unions on how to make the NHS a better place to work".

Nurses are not going to "turn off care" despite union members facing "a desperate situation" and "living in poverty", the RCN's Estephanie Dunn told BBC Breakfast.

Stephen Barclay needs to meet with unions and negotiate - with pay being the "burning issue" for members, she said.

The RCN has threatened to escalate strike action if ministers do not join talks within 48 hours of Tuesday's walkout.

The action by nurses will be followed on Wednesday by a strike by ambulance staff, when Unison, GMB and Unite members take action. GMB union members will go on strike again on 28 December.

Around 1,200 members of the military are being drafted in to cover the striking ambulance workers in a move unions call a "desperate measure". It is expected they will be handling less serious calls.

All of the most life-threatening calls, like cardiac arrest, will be responded too, but people who suffer trips, falls and other non-life threatening injuries may not be sent an ambulance.

North East Ambulance Service said it would not be able to respond to all calls of a serious nature and some patients would have to make their own way to hospital.

Stephen Segasby, from the service, said: "Ambulances will still be able to respond during the strike, but this will only be where there is an immediate risk to life.

"This means that less serious calls will not receive a response and some patients might be asked to make their own way to hospital, where it is safe for them to do so."

London Ambulance Service also warned that patients with conditions that were not life-threatening were unlikely to get an ambulance on strike days.

Nurses' leader Pat Cullen: Profile

The strikes in the health service are part of widespread industrial action across a number of public sectors.

The main union representing Border Force staff is set to walk out for eight days between 23 and 31 December.

Postal strikes will take place on 23 and 24 December - some of the busiest days for pre-Christmas deliveries. The RMT rail workers' union is also set to stage strike action between Christmas Eve and 27 December.





How will patients be affected?
People who are seriously ill or injured, and whose life is at risk, should call 999 as usual, or call 111 for non-urgent care
Other services, such as some cancer treatments, mental health services or urgent testing, may be partially staffed
Routine care is likely to be badly affected, including planned operations such as knee and hip replacements, community nursing services and health visits
Official advice is that those with an appointment which hasn't already been rearranged should turn up at their allotted time
GPs, community pharmacies and dentists will not be affected



Watch Make Sense of Strikes on iPlayer and find out more about why people are striking and whether industrial action works.

UK

Avoid any ‘risky activities’ on ambulance strike day, says health minister

Minister did not offer examples of what might be defined as risky behaviour


Health minister Will Quince

Health minister Will Quince has warned the public to avoid any “risky activities” on Wednesday as ambulance drivers stage strike action.

The NHS is set to be hit by major disruption as ambulance workers including paramedics, control room workers and technicians walk out in England and Wales.

During the strike, the military will not drive ambulances on blue lights for the most serious calls but are expected to provide support on other calls.

The junior minister said that armed forces personnel would play a key role but would not be able to “break the law” when covering for ambulance workers.

Mr Quince urged the public to avoid anything risky on Wednesday, telling BBC Breakfast: “Where people are planning any risky activity, I would strongly encourage them not to do so because there will be disruption on the day.”

The health minister did not offer examples of what might be defined as risky behaviour but told the public that in any emergency calling 999 should still be the first option.

“But the key thing is for anybody that does have an emergency situation or a life-threatening situation that they continue to call 999,” said Mr Quince.

Later on BBC Radio 4, he also said that anyone with chest pains on Wednesday should still call 999.

However, NHS officials are said to fear that some people suffering from heart attacks or strokes at home may not be able to get an ambulance at home when staff strike on Wednesday.

Health secretary Steve Barclay will meet with union officials on Tuesday to insist that both category 1 calls, the most immediate life-threatening cases, and category 2 calls – including heart attacks and strokes – are answered.

Mr Quince said he and health secretary Steve Barclay would stress with union bosses that the government’s “expectation” is for both category 1 and category 2 emergency calls are covered as part of an agreed minimum service.

“My call to the unions ... is that category 1 and category 2 calls – which make up around 50 per cent of all calls to the ambulance service – should be covered as part of derogations [exemptions to the strike],” he told Sky News.

“If you have chest pains, call 999 and the expectation is ... I don’t think that there is any paramedic, ambulance technician, anyone working in our NHS, whether they’re on a picket line or not, that would not respond to a 999 call where somebody has chest pains and there is a threat of a heart attack,” he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.

Mr Quince also suggested that striking nurses, ambulance drivers and paramedics should wait until April 2023 for the next independent pay review. “We look forward to the next pay review in April,” Mr Quince told Sky News.

A History of Malignancy: Governor Polis and the Oil Industry in Colorado

 Facebook

I don’t like horror shows.  So I tend to stay away from things that are senselessly ugly and irrational.  Nevertheless, a few weeks ago, I was prevailed upon to watch and comment on, as it was occurring, the horror show that is the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission in deliberation.

The System at Work:  Example One

Up for consideration was a massive oil and gas project to be developed in Aurora, the second largest city in Colorado and a seamless part of the Denver metropolis.  The applicant calls itself Civitas, a Latin term meaning the citizen base in ancient Rome for political decision making.  Embracing the Roman designations, the COGCC would have been known as civitates foederatae, or loyal satellite state—a roll it played with great distinction on this day.

As for Civitas itself, it is a confederation of old drilling companies, most of whom specialize in urban drilling.  The big boys on Colorado’s Front Range like Chevron or Occidental tend to stay away from people’s bedroom windows when they can.  It ain’t good politics for an industry that is already detested by many for poisoning children with a treasure trove of chemicals such as benzene while continuing to fulfill its central role in hastening the planet’s extinction.  But the three companies making up the bulk of the Civitas empire obviously don’t really care.  These bottom feeders go where no one else dares to go.   As Willie Loman’s uncle might have said had he been on the Civitas’ board: ”there’s money to be made out there boys—so to hell with the people and to hell with the carrots.  You know what to do.  Keep the pols greased and the people confused, and the world stays our oyster.”

The day started out with a few people complaining, some bitterly, about what oil and gas development was doing to their lives.  But this obligatory listening charade has been going on for years with no perceptible change in policy at the COGCC. Resultantly, very few bother to testify anymore.  Frankly, one could expect more response from the stone totems on Easter Island than this professional crew handpicked by Governor Polis to keep the lid on, or as he says, “let the market decide.”

At issue was approval to drill 151 wells on 55 square miles inside the city boundaries of Aurora.  The fact that Aurora projects for the area to have over 12,000 new homes and over 60,000 people in the near future got little discussion because, as we learned, the city slavishly supports the proposal for the taxes it will bring in.

Discussion of impacts on the 10,000 people already living in the new residential development of Aurora Highlands, median age 34, immediately adjacent the Civitas project area got equally dismissive treatment because local objections had been resolved amicably the day before this hearing.  No question this lucky bit of news helped fuel the regulatory rapture.  How this agreement came about or how much it cost got no discussion–Just as the health and climate impacts of adding 150 wells to the 130 Civitas already operates in the area got little discussion.

Approval was fast tracked because the COGCC’s commission head, Jeff Robbins, a truly oleaginous little fellow straight out of Dickens, said that because Aurora officials supported it, the commission had an obligation to do likewise.  He went on to explain, with great solemnity, that the speedy adoption of Aurora’s plans showed their new rules to implement the state oil and gas act, SB19-181, that was passed coming on 4 years were working to perfection.

Perfection Under the Microscope

Let’s review some of these claims of perfection.  First of all, the legislative declaration in the above referenced law is clear and precise:  public wellbeing and the environment are to be protected as an ironclad condition for continued oil and gas development in Colorado.  The seriousness behind these instructions is underscored by the fact that economic considerations are not to be factored in or become in any way controlling in the decision process.

An economic limit on enforcement is a proviso the oil industry fought hard to have included.  It lost.  As a result, SB 181 is a huge break from past federal and state laws dealing with the environment since in almost all cases heretofore enforcement has been controlled by the concept of economic feasibility; that is to say, enforcement had to stop when corrective action was beyond the polluter’s ability to pay or science’s ability to correct.  The public was never guaranteed more than a half loaf of protection.  Since the outset, this professional commission, and Robbins in particular, has been whittling away at SB 181’s full loaf of protection requirement.   It’s why some of the more disgusted observers have come to mockingly refer to the commission as “Jeffy and the Bandits,” almost as if it were some sort of totally disconnected, wacked-out, local rock band.

For example, the COGCC has, little by little, substituted the word prioritize for protect, so that now the decision process rests on prioritizing public health and the environment, rather than protecting it. The press has obediently adopted this radical change in language and meaning.

As a result, Commissioner Robbins and his merry band have effectively repealed SB 181 and its clear legislative intent through rulemaking.  No longer must the public and the environment be protected, but now public and environmental protection has some unknown stature in an ill-defined, if not contemptuously illiterate, hierarchy where it must compete with other considerations for priority:  Is protection of the public and the environment at the top of this ill-defined hierarchy, or is it somewhere in the middle?  Can economic considerations or polluter pleading move it down in this hierarchy?   If we look at the Aurora decision, which rests on the fiction that people and oil wells can all be friends, we have to conclude it is at or near the bottom of the COGCC’s sandcastle evaluation structure.

Mountains of scientific and statistical information underpin this assertion.  For example, while   government representatives and Civitas were having their kumbaya moment, people across the country were being made aware of a new study showing that fossil fuel use is responsible for almost 10,000,000 deaths annually, making it the biggest killer of all time.  Wars end, oil and gas development doesn’t.

Enquiring minds might also wonder how many of those deaths should be chalked up to Colorado public policy makers since Colorado is the 5th largest oil producer in a nation that is the world’s largest producer.  Some might even wonder if we shouldn’t send the sheriff to make some high profile arrests at the governor’s office, for nothing quite creates a moment of coconspirator reflection so much as an arrest at the top.

Another very recent study shows that children living within a mile and a quarter of a single fracked well have almost a 3 times greater chance of developing leukemia than those who don’t.   But this is only one of thousands of scientific and statistical studies that show fracking and oil development are relentless killers.  The wonder is that government is never held to account.

In Colorado much has been made of the fact that the COGCC has a 2000-foot setback requirement separating new wells from people.  But its only a sometimes thing as the Aurora hearing illustrated, since the several families living less than 1000 feet from the proposed drilling project had signed a piece of paper designed by Civitas lawyers stating that they didn’t mind if the frackers moved in next door.  What inducements, if any, were offered was not discussed.

This breezy dismantling of the bedrock democratic principle that government’s first duty is to protect the people drew not even a muffled murmur from the Commission whose 5 members exact from the taxpayers over a million dollars in salary and benefits each and every year.  Clearly, their new rules reestablish prioritizing oil and gas development over protecting public health, or, in other words, the resurrection of law as it was before SB 181 was passed.

And of course the fact that 50,000 new people will soon be moving into the Civitas neighborhood, adding to the 10,000 already there, wasn’t allowed to sully the rapture.  In the case of the newbies, the state has already ruled that protection of anyone moving in after the wells are drilled ain’t none of them.   This peculiar disavowal of responsibility was the handiwork of Senator Hickenlooper when he was governor.   He said it was a matter for local government, not the state.  He also established the ground rule that oil and government could and should be partners, not regulatory adversaries.

An Important Digression

As senator he was recently named one of the top insider stock traders in Congress.  He and his wife’s 17 pages of stock transactions for 2021, which were filed late, show he sold approximately $250,000 in Chevron stock that year.  Chevron is the second largest oil producer in the state.   Recently Polis reminded Coloradans that if he were reelected, as he was to be, it would mean that two wealthy Democratic entrepreneurs, he, a florist and greeting card peddler, and Hickenlooper, a barkeep, would have governed Colorado for 16 straight years.  Some winced.

Public Safety, Colorado Style

What might have been an additional complication at this hearing was the need to address a new state law requiring issues of environmental justice, particularly as they relate to the poor and traditionally underserved minorities, be addressed and resolved.  Felicitous it was then that some, if not all, of the people signing the letter welcoming Civitas to their neighborhood were Latinx.

Left unsaid was whether these people truly understood what they were agreeing to or that such a mindless process could in anyway satisfy government’s foundational responsibility to ensure public safety.

Actually the history behind the establishment of the state’s 2000-foot setback rule is steeped in its own sordidness.  First of all, you need to know that it has no scientific underpinnings.  It is like the rabbit pulled from a hat, it just magically appeared.  The magic behind it was a study commissioned by the state to look at health hazard risks.  The modeling for hazards stopped at 2000 feet, so 2000 feet became the magic number even though study charts in its appendix showed that pollutants like benzene probably posed public health risks at a mile or more, not unlike the recent study cited earlier showing a three times increase in leukemia among children living up to a mile and a quarter from a fracked well.  What difference the addition of 150 wells might make to this statistical evaluation remains unasked and unknown.

It may be relevant that back in in 2021 when Robbins, a lawyer by trade, was making his pronouncement that 2000 feet was protective of public health and safety, he was ignoring studies conducted in his own backyard.  For instance, Dr. Lisa McKenzie of the Colorado School of Public Health and the Environment found that children with a specific childhood leukemia, Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia, “…were four times more likely to be living in the highest density of oil and gas” development than other children.  In another of her studies available to Mr Robbins and the commission she found that mothers“living near more intense oil and gas development have a 40 to 70 percent higher chance of having children with congenital heart defects.”

It’s hard to argue the 2000-foot setback rule isn’t greenwashing on a grand scale.  Nevertheless, it is and continues to be the linchpin allowing the oil industry and the Polis administration to chant in unison, like a worn out 78, that Colorado has the strongest oil and gas regulations in the nation.  That the corporate press has religiously repeated this lie makes it true in the minds of many, and, given the general malevolence within the Polis administration in promoting oil and gas development, affords it unrivaled cover in the public space.

To recap then: the 2000-foot setback has no basis in science.  It can be easily circumvented for any number of reasons, not least of which is the buying off of the soon to be poisoned.   It can also be subverted by the industry proposing what the COGCC’s rules call substantive mitigation.   In other words 2000 feet can become 500 feet if you play it right.

The System at Work: Example two

It’s what some call the Wonder Bread option—2000 feet can be measured at least 12 different ways.  For example about a month ago Chevron came before Polis’s commissioners seeking approval for about 36 new horizontal wells in Weld County, the enduring epicenter for Colorado oil and gas development.  Chevron promised to use “best management practices.” These are quite often such things as natural gas or electric powered drilling rigs rather than diesel and pipelines rather than onsite storage tanks, but most importantly to the case at hand, Chevron said it would close 105 old low or nonproducing wells as part of its mitigation package for the 36 new wells it proposed to drill.

Chevron’s analysis indicated plugging the 105 old wells would reduce overall methane emissions, thus acknowledging there’s a methane emissions problem. But plugging is primarily an engineering and cost consideration.  Rarely if ever is it purely a public health and safety endeavor in the corporate mind, for the simple reason that if old wells remain unplugged within a new fracking field, they may rupture, as they have in the past, causing major surface cleanup costs, to say nothing of expensive delays and major reengineering costs.

Still, Chevron’s good-news announcement caused Commissioner Karin McGowan, a former deputy director at the Colorado Department of Public Health and the Environment and a person who, understandably, seems to be periodically afflicted with eye-lid fatigue at these hearings, to effuse that “This may be the first application where we’re seeing a net-positive cumulative impact.”

Her enthusiasms still searching for a mighty crescendo, she went on to say that while “A couple of the well sites would be within 500 feet of homes…” the fact that the landowner and his renters living there had given their written consent to be poisoned meant “there’s a compelling story here.”

One of Polis’s newly appointed commissioners, Brett Ackerman, a former state wildlife biologist, chimed in by saying, “ I think the lack of concern…by the residents is significant.”

Missing from these nutty assessments was any sense of disbelief or honest doubt that Chevron’s new drilling technology, no matter how whiz bang, could actually reduce pollution while increasing production.  In other words, one might be able to accept that closing 105 old leaking wells and replacing them with 36 gleamingly new ones might decrease the leak rate within this small sample. But the obvious and real question is how much pollution results from burning the product from these 36 new wells which might produce as much as 18,000,000 barrels of oil or oil equivalent over their collective lifetime?  Since the 105 old wells would produce practically nothing beyond their leak rate, the answer is clear, and probably explains why it wasn’t part of the conversation.

Some Troubling Numbers 

In fact if one looks only at the last 5 months since the commission’s rules were made final, we find the commission, as shown in the table below, will have approved or revalidated the development of 4 massive projects, 2 of which, Box Elder and Well Ranch, have been discussed above, and one of which, Guanella, is up for approval soon.  The grand total is approval for 1634 wells on nearly 175,000 acres of land, a land mass almost 5 times the area of the District of Columbia, or a little under twice the City and County of Denver’s land mass.

Add to this any number of random permits from smaller operators that continue to be approved weekly.  And then add that prior to the adoption of the COOCC’s final rules five months ago the Polis administration had already approved over 5000 wells in the preceding 3 years.  It’s at this point that one starts to see how relentlessly this administration is working to help create what U.N. Secretary General António Guterres recently termed a “climate hell.”

Finally, the state’s refusal to assert governmental responsibility in any way for the impacts of new oil development on the safety and well being of people moving into areas after the wells have been drilled is the final page in this sordid story.

The System at Work: Example Three

The COGCC’s treatment of a petition by the City and County of Broomfield is illustrative in this regard.  Broomfield, another seamless city and county within the Denver metropolis, had gone before the COGCC in October to contest Civitas’s plans to drill 19 new wells on the county’s eastern border.  Civitas you’ll recall is the same bunch that was recently approved to build 151 wells in Aurora.

Broomfield is a rapidly growing, middle-class city of roughly 77,000 people, with a population density of about 2,200 people per square mile.   It is home to about 116 wells already, almost all of which are producing.

Broomfield brought evidence and support for their claim that Civitas’s wells would harm their citizens, both physically and emotionally in as much as the city was already peppered with wells, with people testifying that their health and mental well being had been compromised.  The city admitted that while the land immediately adjacent to the planned drilling site wasn’t yet developed for residential use, it soon would be.   And of course once again while there were 2 families that already lived inside the state’s 2000-foot hazard line, they too had given their permission for Civitas to drill next door, inducements unknown.

Recall that Mr. Robbins made quick work in approving the 151 wells in Aurora by claiming the commissioners had an obligation to honor the city’s strong support for the drilling proposal.  But this time Broomfield’s strong objections held little weight.

Mr Robbins, who apparently lives in a hermetically sealed jar that shields him from all outside health and climate information, held that Civitas had “met its burden of proof.” He had in fact weighed all the scientific evidence and “did not feel the science information from Broomfield outweighed the scientific information from Crestone.”

This wily assessment brings up another ignored but oft-repeated instruction from the legislators who managed the passage of SB 181.  It was their clear intent, said they,” that if substantial doubt existed in any public health or environmental decision process the precautionary principle was to apply:  that is, the state was to rule on the side of caution.

 Our old friend Commissioner Karin McGowan stepped in to bring her unique thought processes to the situation by saying: “We have dueling science, dueling data, dueling opinions…this is a community that feels that oil and gas has affected their quality of life. We have to take that into consideration … but Broomfield didn’t prove their (sic) point.”

Using this kind of reasoning we shouldn’t listen to anyone fearing the war in Ukraine might lead to nuclear annihilation or that continued fossil fuel development could lead to societal collapse and unremitting savagery, for there ain’t no proof.

Civitas brought in an environmental company headquartered in Arkansas called CTEH, a company they regularly use.  In fact, according to CTEH’s webpage, it had been employed by Colorado’s oil and gas industry 180 times as of 2020.  The New York Times examined the company and its environmental record a few years back.  The report was not complimentary.  The Times found that CTEH had “vouched for the safety of drywall products made by a Chinese company,” but that the company later settled a class-action lawsuit by “agreeing to pay between $600 million and $1 billion to homeowners affected by hazardous material.”

A retired Exxon engineer said that using CTEH was “like the fox guarding the chicken coup.”  A toxicologist said that CTEH is hired to say, “everything is ok.”

It is against this background that we can once again judge the COGCC at work.

Some Final Thoughts on the Polis Administration

Theodor Adorno in Minima Moralia asserts that intelligence is a moral construct, with feeling or empathy essential to it.  If Adorno be right, then Polis’s commissioners belong in a nursery for the criminally infantile, far, far away from deciding serious grownup issues, such as other peoples’ lives and the life of the planet.

Though I have strong feelings on the subject, I’ll leave it to others to decide where Polis, the father of this pitiful miscarriage, belongs.   Still, a few examples that loom large in my view might help in this decision process.

One of the most important directions given by the legislative to the executive branch in SB 181 was for it to generate a way of measuring the cumulative impacts of oil and gas development in the state, both in the individual instance and collectively.

After almost 4 years, the Polis administration has done nothing in this regard, even though a template was at the ready–the federal government has been doing this sort of thing for 50 years under NEPA.  Under the NEPA process the past, present, and known future actions by any and all parties using public resources, whether directly or indirectly, are collected and analyzed for their likely impacts on the people and the environment.

Without this sort of systematic data gathering and analysis, any attempt at assessing the impacts of oil and gas development on the public and the environment is a game for infants, fools, and charlatans.    Citizen efforts to find out why the state isn’t doing what the law requires have been assiduously rebuffed.  Not long ago I was told in response to a Colorado Open Records Act request that any information the state, and the Air Pollution Control Division in particular, had on its legal responsibilities to perform oil and gas air-impact analyses was privileged lawyer-client information and not available to the public.  One activist asked me later, after reading the state’s slap down, if I thought they knew that according to our state constitution the citizens were the sovereigns?.

Water

And this sort of impact analysis isn’t rocket science.  For example we know from the foregoing discussion that the Polis administration has approved roughly 1634 wells in the past 5 months.  We know from Civitias’s own documents that they intend to use and destroy for any other use 20,000,000 gallons of fresh water to frack each of their wells.  Thus, using their estimate as applicable to all 1634 wells, we get a grand use total of around 33 billion gallons of water, or enough water for domestic needs of 1.2 million people for a year, roughly a fifth of Colorado’s total population.

If you add in the other 5000 wells that have been previously approved during the first three years of the Polis administration, we find that the oil industry has or will use enough water to satisfy the domestic needs of another 3,000,000 people.  Now to be sure water is a renewable resource that follows an annual cycle.   But it’s also true humans generally consume less than 50 percent of the water they use, the rest goes back into the water system to be used again, downstream generally.

Fracking, on the other hand, consumes and destroys all the water it uses because it is too polluted for the industry to economically reclaim—think of it as just another oil subsidy.  Thus, from the standpoint of effective use, it is no exaggeration to say that the oil industry in Colorado has destroyed more water over the last 3 plus years than the citizens of Colorado consume in a year.  Despite oil industry claims to the contrary, it is undeniably a huge water user.

Governor Polis is a strong supporter of the State Water Plan (SWP).  It carries a price tag of $20 billion or more in public development costs.    This plan forecasts that Colorado, by 2050, will suffer water shortages of somewhere between 200,000 and 740,000 acre-feet—an acre-foot (af) is 326,000 gallons of water.  The 200,000 af estimate of future human and industrial water needs in Colorado is about equal to what the oil industry will require to drill the wells the state has approved in the last 5 months, provided we apply the accurate concept of total destruction rather than the usual concept of consumptive use.

Admittedly this is a crude and ready analysis, but it is ballpark, and it cries out for serious comparative analysis and priority setting.  This is especially so since in the opinion of many the SWP does not adequately address what are forecast to be the severe impacts of climate change on future water availability.

Besides the obvious question about why this administration’s left and right hand aren’t acquainted, a question also begins to surface about whether this administration even wants to know.  Too, this cavalier destruction of the public’s water brings up another question about adequate public notice?  Unlike the federal government, Colorado has direct democracy, and since water in this state belongs to the people, not the government, the people have the right to expect a direct vote on whether it wants its most valuable resource destroyed through fracking, a practice that is also helping destroy the planet?

Clearly, if this administration weren’t foot dragging on its statutory requirement to do cumulative health and environmental impact analyzes as a condition for more oil and gas development, these issues would have surfaced and the public would have had a chance to participate in the decisions, but just as clearly, that’s not the way it’s unfolded.

Wildlife

The impacts on wildlife, which are also compelled by SB 181 to be protected, are an even greater regulatory wasteland.  For example about a year ago, a group of bird watchers brought to the attention of the COGCC that one of the companies that now form Civitas was drilling very near a Bald Eagle nesting area.  They sought curtailment of development activity during the nesting season.  They of course lost, because in the words of one of the commissioners,, she didn’t think the COGCC had the authority to regulate off the well site itself.  The meaning of “protect” was simply lost on them.  The immediate impact was that while about 20 nesting eagles were counted the year prior to drilling, the birders could find only one eagle in the area the year following.

In the entire history of the COGCC no drilling permit has ever been denied for wildlife or environmental reasons, and only once for public safety reasons, but that denial is sure to be reversed as soon as the internecine food fight that caused it is resolved behind closed doors.

Air

No one should be surprised to find that, like land and water, impact analyzes of oil and gas on Colorado’s air quality have been just as assiduously avoided.  This has occurred despite the fact the state’s air quality rating for ozone poisoning was recently downgraded by EPA from serious to severe, a rating that puts Colorado’s Northern Front Range, with a population of at least 3,000,000 people, among the riskiest places in the United States to live in term of asthma affliction and increased premature death risks.

The state has long accepted that the major source of Front Range VOCs, which with sunlight produce ozone, are the fracking fields of Weld County.  Yet, In the Polis administration’s master plan for improving the state’s air quality, it pathologically underestimates the contribution Weld’s oil production has on the state’s air pollution.  As a result, the people become the villains, and the administration is hard on the trail of gas lawn mowers and automobile use.  The state actually had a plan to encourage car sharing and public transportation use, until some corporations and the Chamber of Commerce objected that it might negatively impact industry efficiency and profits.  Governor Polis then curtailed the plan.

I recently participated in a conversation with midlevel managers at the APCD.  The meeting had been arranged by Chandra Rosenthal, the regional attorney for Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER).  She and PEER had recently represented 3 pollution modelers from the APCD who claimed that the agency was not ensuring that air pollution permits complied with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) before approval.   They were just pushing them out the door.  The agency claimed it had no requirement to do modeling for many of the polluters seeking pollution permits under the CAA.  It of course refused to judge its conduct under SB 181, which clearly requires this sort of analysis as essential to determining health and environmental impacts.   The state hired a corporate law firm from Atlanta to review the whistle blower complaint, and still the whistle blowers won.  It resulted in the division chief, Garry Kaufman, being demoted.  It also resulted in two of the three whistle blower modelers quitting.

Through the miracle of magical thinking so endemic to the APCD, Mr. Kaugman has resurfaced as the Deputy Director for Regulatory Affairs, thus putting him back in charge of the things he was demoted for.

Our conversation this day was about when and how the APCD was coordinating with the COGCC on modeling for air pollution from proposed drilling permits.  We discovered, as we feared, there wasn’t any coordination.   The APCD simply did no pollution modeling prior to the drilling permit being approved by the COGCC, and, that, in fact, the COGCC approved the wells solely under its own procedures and that actual modeling for air pollution might lag drilling approval by as much as two years.  They said that SB 181 was primarily the COGCC’s responsibility and that they generally waited on instructions from the COGCC with regard to oil and gas matters.  They said apologetically that they were doing the best they could.

As discouraging as this exchange was, it did answer unofficially what the APCD refused to answer officially in an Open Records Act request.  To whit:  SB 181, a law created specifically to protect people and the environment in all issues related to oil and gas, and a law enacted to repeal and replace its predecessor, which openly encouraged and protected oil and gas development, has little to no impact on the everyday workings or culture of the APCD.

Polis’s appointments to a commission overseeing the APCD is further evidence of a protectiveness of the oil industry in his administration that some people think borders on criminality.  This 8-member commission unlike the 5 commissioners at the COGCC are not highly paid.  Theirs is basically an honoraria position, with the commissioners holding full-time paid positions elsewhere.  This commission is called the AQCC,  Air Quality Control Commission.  It has oversight authority over the professional staff at the APCD, which as I’ve said before has state responsibility for air quality monitoring and enforcement.

In 2020, Polis began reshaping this commission.  First he refused to reappoint its staunchest climate hawk.  Then, little by little he has replaced the commission with oil men, so that today 4 out of its 8 members are oil men or oil industry sympathizers.  One is a retired oilman, 2 hold management positions at Chevron and Occidental, the two largest operators in the state.

Gary Arnold , the fourth, is the business manager for the local Pipefitters Union—this is not your father’s union boasting of brotherhood and working-class solidarity.  Arnold openly opposed and actively worked against a citizen sponsored statewide 2500-foot setback initiative.  It almost passed, even though Polis too opposed it under the rubric of “one sight doesn’t fit all. “  This bought-at-Walmart wisdom is obviously true when talking pant size, but in a regularity environment it is patent nonsense.   Take away the posted speed signs in your neighborhood and then count the kids on bikes and little old ladies walking their dogs you can kill in a month.

Arnold actively supported the Jordon Cove project in Oregon, which would have taken Colorado methane by pipeline for liquefying and marketing in Asia. More recently he helped form a sham front-organization for oil and gas called Coloradans for Energy Access.  Its purpose is to stop any legislation or local ordinances that force electrification.  Their disinformation campaign is propped up by the lie that natural gas is cheaper than renewables and that rapid conversion to renewables would further impoverish the poor.

The most recent addition to the AQCC is Bill Gonzalez.  He’s become the industry’s Swiss army knife on regulatory matters.  Indeed, before his recent appointment to the AQCC, Polis had picked him for the COGGC back in 2020 when the new “professional” commissioner was established.

To be eligible for appointment to the COGCC Gonzalez had resigned his job at Occidental, maybe at some sacrifice in salary if he was already making over $150 annually.  His new appointment to the AQCC has no such requirement against outside employment, even if that employment is in the industry that is the major contributor to Colorado’s air quality problems.  Neither did his appointment need Senate confirmation since the appointment was made while the legislature was out of session.

When at the COGCC, he was the only member voting against the 2000-foot setback, which was a wasted industry intervention since as I’ve shown the GOGCC’s setback rule can mean almost anything and therefore means nothing.  Most importantly, he was an industry champion during the bonding rulemaking.

This was probably the most financially important rule for the industry because of exponential cost increases it would experience if decisions went the wrong way.  For example several grassroots groups, not knowing how hopelessly the odds were stacked against them, asked that the industry deposit with the state full cash bonding for each and every  well in an ownership.  Their argument was one for simple equity.  The industry enjoyed all the profits, they should therefore accept all the risks.

The industry in the past, as it does now, transfers most of the risk of closing old wells to the public by a bonding system that covers only a sliver of the actual costs should it default.  In 2021, EPA estimated there could be as many 3.4 million abandoned wells nationally.  These wells all belonged to someone.  The someones just walked away, leaving cleanup and maintenance to the public. The Biden administration has allocated $4.7 billion in public money to start cleanup of orphaned wells nationally.  It’s another subsidy to the industry of course, but it is a mere drop in the bucket to the likely overall costs.

COGCC claims Colorado has roughly 600 abandoned wells, and that there are roughly 50,000 active, unplugged wells, with as many as 70 percent being low or nonproducing.  Some percentage of these 50,000 wells will, over time, become orphaned and a public liability.  The COGCC had a chance to ensure against that, but didn’t, instead favoring a complex approach in which operators come in to argue before the COGCC as to how much insurance is proper for them.  It thwarts public participation and is so fraught with exception making, that it is still not an operative rule.

During the hearings themselves, Mr. Gonzalez stood strongly against full cash bonding.  He said the oil industry “had better things to do with its money.”  He apparently didn’t think the people did.  His position, which was also the industry’s position, won. Not long thereafter he resigned, saying he didn’t know where he’d land, but he was off seeking new horizons.

After what the industry must have considered a respectable hiatus, he reappeared, once again, as a employee of Occidental.  But lo and behold he was no longer just the “Land Manager” for the DJ Basin.  He was now the “Director” for the Rockies Surface Land.  Who says virtue isn’t rewarded?   It is when it wears a painted face.

Mr. Gonzalez can once again serve both Occidental and Governor Polis.  That he will not and cannot serve the people of Colorado is predetermined not only by past performance, but by the fact his continued employment at Occidental and the brass nameplate showing him to be a “Director” is dependent on serving the corporation, not the people.

It’s been said there are places where some things are so wrong that not even their opposite is true.  The COGCC and the APCD are two of those places.  At the Governor’s Mansion you’ll discover the source of the wrongsy.  It will be disguised in soothing words, endless promises, and clever denials.  By this shall you know it.

 DECEMBER 9, 2022

US is like 'a mafia boss in his later years': expert at GT annual conference

China-US ties in uncertainty for next 10 years, hit by Russia-Ukraine conflict: observers

By GT staff reporters
Published: Dec 17, 2022 


Photo: Global Times

As the Russia-Ukraine conflict aggravated bloc confrontation and has impacted China-US relations, bilateral ties will likely remain in "a turbulent state of uncertainty" for the next five to 10 years until the power comparison of the two countries becomes more balanced, Chinese foreign policy scholars said at the 2023 Global Times Annual Conference.

Russia-Ukraine conflict is not only the biggest international political event this year, but the biggest since the end of the Cold War. It has crippled the very foundation of the American system, Jin Canrong, associate dean of the School of International Studies at the Renmin University of China, said when addressing the 2023 Global Times Annual Conference.

Answering the question at the conference as to what impact the Russia-Ukraine conflict has had on China-US relations, Jin said "it will certainly have an impact on China-US relations, but to what extent it will have an impact is hard to judge as the conflict remains ongoing and will probably last two or three more years."

The Russia-Ukraine conflict has shocked the very foundation of the American system, a system that we have to admit we have lived under since the end of the Cold War. But the US is not what it used to be, Jin told the audience.

"The US is not in its prime of life, no longer the protagonist of movies like 007 who are handsome, elegant, quick in its action and reaction. Today's US is like a mafia boss in his later years, can barely walk but still holds particularly large power. Today, US' position is largely determined by its system," Jin said.

Jin noted that the US system creates a world market system, full of opportunities, which lures people in and then controls them by all means. On the surface, financial hegemony, high-tech monopoly, pricing power, international rules, procedures, media appear to be under US control, but in fact, violence is its basic method used in controlling the world.

PLA Navy rear admiral Yang Yi said at the annual conference that as time goes by, maybe 10 years later when the China-US power comparison becomes more balanced, bilateral relations may shift toward a relatively stable status.

Yang said the dirty tricks used by the US to contain China are useless. "They cannot stop China's development, nor can they stop the narrowing of gap between China's comprehensive national strength and that of the US."

Some other experts shared their opinions on the China-US relations. They agreed that the China-US relation is still a bilateral question but it must be seen as part of a larger global confrontation, under the influence of the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

He Weiwen, a former senior trade official and an executive council member of the China Society for World Trade Organization Studies, said that under the strong push of the US, the world has been divided into two camps: Western and non-Western groups.

"Since the Russia-Ukraine conflict broke out, the US has maliciously tied China and Russia up. Washington used sandbox maneuvers and planned to impose crippling sanctions on China, as it has on Russia. The reason why it has not been implemented is that the US has no grip on China," He noted.

The Russia-Ukraine crisis has brought back and highlighted bloc politics confrontation with the US and NATO on the same line and those disapproving them in the other side, said Fang Ning, a research fellow at the Institute of Political Science from Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

Geopolitical factors have been placed in an unprecedented important position in bilateral relations which may lead to major confrontation. "Despite that the bottom line for the two sides is to avoid moving toward major confrontation, I have doubts over how much risk will be mitigated," said Huang Renwei, executive vice dean of Fudan Institute of Belt and Road & Global Governance.

The Ukraine crisis has become a trap for both the US and China on the Taiwan question. The US is worried about the recurrence of what happened in Ukraine and has accelerated military aid to the island while China is alert to a series of US' provocations on the Taiwan question, Huang said.

Fang pointed out the biggest effect of the crisis on China is that it added uncertainty to the national reunification. "Countries and regions around the Taiwan Straits including Japan, South Korea, the Philippines and Vietnam are assessing the question, choosing sides and even taking action as we can see Japan has made the quickest reaction."

Yang Xiyu, a senior research fellow at the China Institute of International Studies, told the Global Times annual conference that the saying "today's Ukraine is tomorrow's Taiwan" has become very popular in the West but the fact is that Ukraine and Taiwan are two completely separate and fundamentally different issues.

Yang said the National Defense Authorization Act that passed on December 15 by US Senate proposes to learn from the model of Ukraine, improve the so-called resilience of the Taiwan military by means of military aid, military training and intelligence support, and strengthen the island's so-called self-defense capability against the People's Liberation Army.

Yang also believes the Russia-Ukraine crisis will have a profound influence on China-US relations in the future. He explained that the conflict between Russia and Ukraine comes at a time when the original European security order has failed, and the new order has not yet emerged. Different outcomes of the conflict will lead to different security orders and security rules in Europe, which will inevitably spill over into the international community.

Shen Dingli, a professor from Fudan University's Institute of International Studies, said although China hopes that the bilateral relationship will move toward common cooperation, the fact is that relations between China and the US are highly strained and heading toward unprecedented, multi-dimensional and large-scale competition.

"Over the next five to 10 years, the relationship between China and the US will remain in a turbulent state of uncertainty," Shen said.

US becomes largest market for Taiwan farm exports

President Tsai Ing-wen promises help for farmers hit by Chinese boycott


By Matthew Strong, Taiwan News, Staff Writer
2022/12/17 17:45

President Tsai Ing-wen speaks at an agricultural event outside the Presidential Office Building Saturday
. (CNA photo)


TAIPEI (Taiwan News) — Taiwan’s farm exports surged to a record value of $5.67 billion (NT$174.55 billion) last year, with the United States becoming the largest market, showing the country’s diversification policies have worked, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said Saturday (Dec. 17).

She was speaking after China blocked the import of food and beverage products from Taiwan, including fish, seafood, fruit and beer. Tsai told a Council of Agriculture (COA) event in front of the Presidential Office on Saturday that Taiwan’s agricultural exports were no longer dependent on just one export market.

In addition to the U.S., Japan, Australia, Canada, the Philippines, and Indonesia were also markets welcoming farm products from Taiwan, the president said. She promised the government would do its utmost to help the farmers and fishermen who had lost their market in China by finding alternatives, Radio Taiwan International (RTI) reported.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine had disrupted the international food supply chain, but Taiwan still produced a wealth of rice and rice-based foods, Tsai said, adding she hoped farmers would also receive support from local consumers.
Senate backs big land transfer for Nevada military complex

The U.S. Senate has passed a massive expansion of a northern Nevada naval air training complex that will transfer a huge swath of public land to the military

By GABE STERN Associated Press/Report for America
December 16, 2022, 

 In this Sept. 3, 2015, file photo provided by the U.S. Navy, F-35C Lightning IIs, attached to the Grim Reapers of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 101, and F/A-18E/F Super Hornets attached to the Naval Aviation Warfighter Development Center 

The Associated Press

RENO, Nev. -- The U.S. Senate has voted for a massive expansion of a northern Nevada naval air training complex that will transfer of a huge swath of public land to the military.

The Senate on Thursday approved as part of the annual defense spending bill what is likely to be one of the final steps in yearslong negotiations to designate 872 additional square miles (2,258 square kilometers) of land for bombing and military use to the Naval Air Station (NAS) Fallon, which is 65 miles (104 kilometers) east of Reno.

The measure also designates more than 906 square miles (2,347 square kilometers) of land for conservation, wilderness areas and other protected areas, as well as roughly 28 square miles (73 square kilometers) of land and $20 million each to two Native American tribes. Churchill County, where the training facility is located, will also receive $20 million.

The Fallon complex is the Navy’s main aviation training range, supporting aviation and ground training, including live-fire exercises. All naval strike aviation units and some Navy SEALs train at Fallon before deployment.

The House approved the National Defense Authorization Act last week. It now awaits President Joe Biden’s signature.

The management of Nevada’s vast swaths of federal land, and the differing needs it serves, has long been a push-and-pull for different groups in Nevada that has resulted in legal battles over lithium mining, development, national monuments and endangered species designations. The training facility expansion has been under consideration for years as Nevada’s congressional delegation has introduced it time and again while trying to balance the interests of different groups, including the Navy, conservationists, counties and Native American tribes who have long considered the land to be sacred.

The expansion will “improve our national security, fuel economic growth in Churchill County, and preserve important cultural heritage sites for Tribal nations,” Democratic Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto said in a statement. Praise also came from Nevada Gov. Steve Sisolak and Sen. Jacky Rosen, both Democrats, and Republican Rep. Mark Amodei and Churchill County Chairman Pete Olsen.

The Navy has said the expansion is critical to meeting combat training needs for modern aircraft and weapons systems that have outgrown training capabilities over the past two decades.

“This critical legislation enhances our Nation’s security by allowing our Carrier Air Wings and Naval Special Warfare Teams to train in a more realistic environment and better prepare for strategic competition,” Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro said in a statement.

Several groups have historically been split or mixed on the expansion, including conservationists and some nearby tribes. Brian Sybert, the executive director for the Conservation Lands Foundation, thanked Cortez Masto, Rosen and Amodei for “crafting a delicate community compromise that has resulted in the only conservation win within this year’s NDAA.”

But Patrick Donnelly of the Center for Biological Diversity called it “a devastating loss for Nevada wildlife.”

He said the public land set to be transferred is one of the few swaths of U.S. land that is largely absent of humans. He added that even parts of the land that will still be maintained by the U.S. Interior Department will still hold combat training exercises that can harm wildlife.


Tribes that have been living in the area where the training complex is located and who consider the valley to be sacred were more optimistic.


“While our tribe will never support the expansion of NAS taking more of our ancestral lands,” said Cathy Williams-Tuni, the chairwoman of the Fallon Paiute-Shoshone tribe, “we’re still very thankful and grateful of the many benefits that the NDAA for our tribe has.”

Williams-Tuni has said that they would work closely with the military and Nevada’s delegation to “come up with — we don’t always want to say this word, but a compromise.”

The Paiute-Shoshone Tribe is not against national defense, she added, but there is also an importance to the ancestral lands, with burial sites and artifacts spread out across it.

Over the past year, the Nevada congressional delegation, Interior Department, and Navy officials have engaged with northern Nevada tribes that would be affected by the expansion. The assistant secretary of the interior also flew to Nevada to visit the land and the tribe. About two weeks ago, Williams-Tuni met with Department of Interior and Indian Health Service officials in Washington D.C.

Williams said Thursday that the next step is for the tribe to co-steward the lands with the Department of the Interior and the Navy, which she could potentially include a cleanup program of military residue and the transfer of some vital materials to the tribe for heating subsystems.

The Fallon Paiute-Shoshone tribe funding will go toward building and maintaining a cultural center, and the Walker River Paiute tribe’s $20 million is due to past ordnance contamination on tribal land, with about 13 square miles (34 square kilometers) held in trust.

Williams-Tuni said Thursday that although she still opposes the plan as a whole, she is looking forward to “explaining to our membership how we didn’t just give away, and we didn’t give in.”

When the NDAA passed the House last week, Amber Torres, Chairman of the Walker River Paiute tribe, called it “a momentous day where an historic injustice against the Walker River Paiute Tribe has been resolved” in a statement.

———

Stern is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms. Follow Stern on Twitter: @gabestern326.