Tuesday, June 09, 2026

Revealed: Israel’s Curriculum for ‘influencing public consciousness’

Source: +972 Magazine

Israel’s defense establishment is training soldiers and other defense officials to conduct psychological operations designed to “influence public consciousness” in Israel and abroad, an internal Defense Ministry tender published last July and obtained by the Israeli investigative outlet The Hottest Place in Hell reveals. The courses, taught in Hebrew and English by academics who are not affiliated with the military, are intended for defense personnel based both domestically and overseas, as well as unspecified “foreign partners.”

Among the offerings are courses on how to use data to discretely shape the attitudes and actions of target audiences, intelligence gathering for such operations, and influencer training. Most of the courses are geared toward “offensive” influence operations — those aimed at actively disrupting or manipulating the beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors of target audiences rather than simply protecting an existing narrative. They include training in advertising and marketing content, alongside courses on cyber warfare and intelligence gathering on target audiences.

In one course, participants learn to apply “Black Hat” techniques — a term used to describe manipulation methods that circumvent tech platforms’ rules around cybercrime, cyber warfare, or other malicious activity. The army course explicitly states that this module is designed for “the distribution and promotion of illegitimate content using technological tools and solutions — a route that bypasses Facebook and Google.”

Another course teaches participants how to plan “information operations for the purpose of influencing public consciousness in the local and international arena,” including how to craft and disseminate messages tailored to a target population, assess their impact, and apply the lessons to “future operations.”

Although the syllabus does not make explicit the targets or substance of the psychological operations and influence campaigns taught in the courses, it states in several places that the training is conducted in accordance with the “considerations and expectations” of Israel’s political echelon. In other words, at the government’s directive. 

The Defense Ministry sought to contract a vendor for two years, with an option to extend the agreement for up to four years in total. The first course was scheduled to begin in August 2025. 

The tender was open to institutions accredited by Israel’s Council for Higher Education. Lecturers were required to hold “doctorates and/or professorships in the fields of influence, consciousness, security and terrorism, mass communication, [or] digital and network communication,” as well as “at least four years of professional experience in the fields of influence [or] influence intelligence in various security organizations.”

‘Fundamentals of propaganda’

According to the tender, the training program consists of eight courses per year: three in influence operations, two in “influence intelligence,” and three in “online activist” training. Each course is designed for up to 40 students, meaning the program could train around 320 “influence experts” annually.

The curriculum is divided into thematic clusters. One, titled “fundamentals of psychological warfare, propaganda, deception, legitimacy and public diplomacy, and segmentation of target populations with emphasis on foreign audiences,” includes instruction on identifying adversarial influence efforts, narratives, and imagery, as well as deepfakes, psychological warfare, propaganda, deception, legitimacy, and public diplomacy.

Another cluster, focused on “campaign planning, execution, and evaluation,” includes training on the “considerations and expectations” of the political echelon, alongside “military intelligence,” “cultural intelligence,” and “intelligence collection and research capabilities for influence.”

Some of the courses — including those on influence operations, influence intelligence, and online activism — will be in English for “foreign partners,” whose identities are not specified. For these participants, the Defense Ministry built a dedicated syllabus that includes study of “the American approach,” meaning U.S. perspectives and cultural norms, and conducting influence campaigns in the international arena.

To allow these foreign entities to take part, the ministry determined that the courses will be “unclassified.” Yet the tender still imposes strict confidentiality measures separating the civilian lecturers from the trainees. Academic institutions are prohibited from disclosing students’ roles in the intelligence community to instructors and the wider public, and contractors are to receive only trainees’ first names, with no unit affiliation. 

The document also suggests the military is integrating these influence operations into its wider intelligence apparatus. The “influence intelligence” course is designed to train participants to use the army’s intelligence collection systems to supply influence campaigns with data, while maintaining awareness of “what is happening in additional places around the world.”

Beyond supplying raw material for psychological operations, intelligence is also presented as a tool for measuring their impact. The result is a closed feedback loop: intelligence gathers data on target audiences; influence campaigns attempt to shape their perceptions; and intelligence tools are then used to assess whether the messaging worked or needs refinement in real time.

The section on “cultural intelligence” extends this logic into the realm of social and psychological profiling. Participants are trained to analyze target populations — especially foreign audiences — through their cultural codes, social sensitivities, and political contexts, in order to craft messages more likely to penetrate and persuade. 

In response to a request for comment, an Israeli army spokesperson described the program as “an academic course for personnel engaged in the influence and consciousness effort in the IDF,” adding that its purpose was “personal enrichment.” It affirmed that it “operates according to law and clear procedures, in accordance with the directives of the political echelon.”

However, as a recent investigation by The Hottest Place in Hell revealed, the military does not limit these methods to the realm of “personal enrichment.” Between October 2023 and December 2024, the IDF Spokesperson’s Unit conducted a psychological operation targeting both Israeli and international audiences, under the guise of a “non-profit news organization” specializing in “fact-checking” claims surrounding Israel’s war on Gaza.

As part of that operation, dozens of videos promoting the Israeli military’s talking points were published without proper disclosure, while influencers in Israel and abroad were recruited to amplify messages dictated directly by the military. What was exposed at the time as a discrete initiative now appears to be part of a broader, long-term effort by Israel’s defense establishment to institutionalize influence operations on a national — and even international — scale.

A version of this article was first published in Hebrew on The Hottest Place in Hell. Read it here.


This article was originally published by +972 Magazine; please consider supporting the original publication, and read the original version at the link above.Email

Illy Pe’ery is an investigative reporter and associate editor at the independent Israeli online magazine The Hottest Place in Hell.

Israel mistreats Flotilla activists and tortures Palestinian prisoners

Sunday 7 June 2026, by An Gwesped



After the Israeli army’s violent interception of the Gaza flotilla, activists have denounced humiliation and violence — a long-documented glimpse into the torture and sexual violence suffered by Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails. More than 430 activists from the 50 boats that set out to break the blockade of Gaza were kidnapped by the Israeli occupation army between Monday 18 and Tuesday 19 May, in international waters off the coast of Cyprus, up to 500 km from the coast of Gaza for the most distant boats and about 100 kilometres for the closest.

Turkey, Spain, Jordan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Brazil, Indonesia, Colombia, Libya, the Maldives and even Meloni’s Italy have denounced these abductions as “flagrant violations of international law and international humanitarian law”.

Violence against flotilla activists

On Wednesday, 20 May, Ben Gvir, Israel’s Minister of National Security, released a video of flotilla activists kneeling and with their hands tied, after being detained in southern Israel, at the port of Ashdod. Violence constituting an attack on human dignity.

“Welcome to Israel, we are at home,” the minister says in these images published on X, with the Israeli national anthem playing in the background. An activist is shown stretched in half and violently pushed by a uniformed guard, whose hand holds his head downwards, before being dragged to the ground. Other prisoners were also subjected to violence, forced to move with their backs bent, their hands tied and their heads held to the ground.

In other propaganda images, Ben Gvir, a large Israeli flag in his hand, proudly points to the tied activists, saying: “Oh they were very proud, look at them now, where are they?” Then he addresses Benyamin Netanyahu: “Give them to us, give them to me, so that we can keep these terrorists in prison for a very long time.”

All the kidnapped activists were released at the end of last week, but all of them reported humiliation as well as physical and sexual violence — which is also confirmed by our two comrades from the NPA-Anticapitaliste, Laetitia and Macéo, who are part of this flotilla. This is just a glimpse of the violence against the Palestinian people, especially against prisoners who are subjected to torture and sexual violence on a daily basis.

Torture of Palestinian prisoners

On the eve of Ben Gvir’s intervention, a UN special rapporteur, Alice Jill Edwards, denounced the fact that Palestinian prisoners are subjected to torture, sexual violence and other ill-treatment. It said it had documented 52 cases of torture in various forms, as well as 33 cases of sexual torture and other sexual violence.

Among the reported cases are “beatings, stress positions, excessive restraints, electricity, sleep deprivation, malnutrition and starvation, prolonged secret detention”, as well as conditions of detention deemed “inhumane and degrading”. In a communication to the Israeli authorities, she noted that of the 1,680 complaints lodged against the Israeli intelligence services, none had resulted in an indictment.

As a reminder, according to Addameer, nearly 9,400 Palestinians are detained in Israel, including 2,200 in administrative detention. We must demand that our complicit states stop selling arms to Israel and impose sanctions on this colonial and apartheid state. France banned Ben Gvir from staying in “reprisals”, while condemning “the uselessness of the flotillas” (Jean-Noël Barrot). The fact that the French authorities were forced to take this measure against this Israeli fascist proves that the flotillas were useful — unlike French diplomacy.

29 May 2026

Translated by International Viewpoint from l’Anticapitaliste.

Trump Pentagon secretly deployed paratroopers to Israel: report


Robert Davis
June 8, 2026 
RAW STORY

President Donald Trump's Pentagon has quietly deployed paratroopers from the Army's 82nd Airborne in Israel, the latest sign of escalating tensions in the war in Iran, according to a new report.

Journalist Ken Klippenstein reported on his Substack on Monday, citing a military source involved in war planning, that the deployment is part of a contingency plan between the U.S. and Israel "for seizing Kharg Island and carving out coastal territory inside Iran." That plan, Klippenstein reported, has been in place since at least February.

"By keeping the deployment quiet, the Pentagon headed off public debate over a joint U.S.-Israeli operation inside Iran — a prospect many considered plausible at the time, amid a fever pitch of mainstream reporting on a potential ground invasion," the report reads. "The secrecy also sidestepped what's euphemistically called "host nation sensitivities." A joint U.S.-Israeli operation raises thorny questions for America's Gulf Arab "partners," especially over logistical support — hence the 82nd, which could launch directly from Israel without any Gulf state's consent to use its territory."

"The Army deployment order, issued April 7, 2026, directs elements of the 2nd Battalion, 501st Infantry Regiment — the storied 'Geronimo' battalion — to deploy to Israel on 'temporary duty.' The Israel deployment has not been previously reported," it added.

"The Pentagon has never acknowledged it; in public it has said only that the 82nd was bound for 'CENTCOM,' the military's term for U.S. Central Command, the combatant command responsible for the entire Middle East. The press echoed the vague terminology, suggesting the unit was headed to existing U.S. bases in Kuwait or Qatar," the report continued.
House Rejects Ro Khanna’s Effort to Block US-Israel Military Integration

Khanna introduced an amendment to strike down the proposal on Thursday, but was met with widespread opposition.
June 8, 2026

U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) questions U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth during a House Armed Services Committee hearing on April 29, 2026 in Washington, DC.Kevin Dietsch / Getty Images

On Thursday, the House of Representatives pushed forward with a measure to increase military cooperation between the U.S. and Israel despite one congressman’s efforts to block the proposal.

The House Armed Services Committee held a marathon session Thursday on the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) budget, concluding after midnight on Friday and ultimately approving $1.15 trillion for defense programs.

Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna (California) attempted to remove Section 224 of the NDAA, which calls for an increase in military cooperation between the U.S. and Israel, but was met with opposition, including from fellow Democrats.

Section 224 of the NDAA calls for an increase in military technical cooperation between the U.S. and Israel’s defense industries, with the creation of a position in the Pentagon to “synchroniz[e] cooperative efforts,” and “expand and accelerate bilateral defense technology research, development, testing, evaluation, integration, and industrial cooperation.” This would also entail more cooperation on missile defense, AI, and other technology, “joint training exercises,” and more collaboration across “government, private sector, and academic institutions” in the U.S. and Israel.

Khanna introduced an amendment to strike down the proposal on Thursday, but was met with widespread opposition, with only a single Democrat voicing approval.

Khanna attempted to appeal to lawmakers across the political spectrum in his remarks, saying, “Everyone in America – whether you’re a Republican, an independent or a Democrat – says that we need to tell Netanyahu that America calls the shots, not the prime minister of any other country.”

Khanna was referring to a letter penned by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that endorsed the measure and called for the U.S.-Israel relationship “to move from aid recipient to partner” under a “new framework of joint defense cooperation.” Khanna claimed that Section 224 echoed Netanyahu’s demand.

“[Americans] want less cooperation and blank checks to Israel, not more. Only the United States Congress would dream up at this moment, ‘Let’s actually do more for Israel,’ not less,” Khanna said.

But eight committee members – including Democrats – spoke against Khanna’s amendment. They said that the creation of the liaison position would ensure U.S. supervision of the program, and that the technology-sharing would allow the U.S. to benefit from Israeli technology.

This technology has been developed through the subjugation of Palestinians – Gaza especially has been used as a “testing ground” for Israeli technology. Since 2024, south Lebanon, too, has become a testing ground for Israeli weapons technologies.

Washington Rep. Adam Smith – the lead Democrat on the committee – said that he was “sympathetic” to Khanna’s argument. “Mr. Netanyahu insisted on this war with Iran that has strengthened Iran and weakened our position. I do not like his leadership of Israel or where he is going,” he said.

But Smith insisted that having a military partnership with Israel is useful “because Israel has actually been having to fight.”

“They have faced drone attacks and missile attacks. They have had to develop new technologies, technologies that we’ve benefitted from,” he continued.

Smith also stated that the framework was not new. “We have three existing programs right now where we do military cooperation with Israel to develop technologies. Those programs already exist,” he said.

Only Rep. Sara Jacobs (D-California) spoke in favor of the amendment. “The United States should have the same standards for Israel as we do for everyone else,” she said. “If any other country in the world had been credibly accused of violating U.S. and international law again and again, of killing tens of thousands of civilians, of blocking food and medicine from reaching a starving population, we would not be moving to deepen and permanently expand our military ties with them.”

But the lack of support from other Democrats is a reminder that the U.S. sees working more closely with Israel as in its own interests, too, not just Israel’s – and a long line of both Democratic and Republican presidents have maintained this position for decades.


We Should Not ‘Integrate’ Our Military With Any Foreign Nation!

by | Jun 9, 2026 | Antiwar.com

Not since the notorious 2012 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) provided for indefinite detention of American citizens, has the annual funding bill been as misused as this year. Embedded in the bill is an insult to every American who values our national sovereignty. The NDAA’s Section 224, the “United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative,” would “integrate” the Israeli military with our own, fusing technology, production, intelligence-sharing, and more.

As Ben Freeman wrote last week in Responsible Statecraft:

“The US and Israel already work together heavily on missile defense, but this provision would greatly expand coordination to seemingly every area of defense tech, including AI, quantum, autonomous systems, directed energy, cyber, biotech, and many more. It also proposes ‘network integration’ and ‘data fusion.’ In other words, the US military’s data could soon be the Israeli military’s data.”

It is hard to think of a more “America last” position than handing the keys to the Pentagon (and our intelligence community) to a foreign country.

The insanity of Section 224 is made even more clear with news over the weekend that the Pentagon has raised to “critical” the threat level of Israel spying on the United States and its officials!

We should not “integrate” our military with any foreign country or organization, but integrating with a country that is a “critical” espionage threat to our national security? How does this make any sense?

The “problem” for American lawmakers is that after the killing in Gaza and now Lebanon, the American people – particularly younger Americans – have turned sharply against the US relationship with Israel. This foreign entanglement has sucked billions from the US treasury over the decades, and it has sucked us into endless conflict in the Middle East, including the current US war on Iran.

Rather than listen to the will of their constituents, Congress has decided to defy the wishes of Americans in favor of the wishes of a foreign government. AIPAC largely controls our Congress and passing Section 224 would be a great victory for the foreign lobby.

It should come as no surprise that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu endorses Section 224. He may have written it for all we know!

Should Section 224 remain in the NDAA, it would essentially remove future Congresses from any role in determining what level of support, cooperation, and oversight should be included in the US relationship with Israel. It would be worse even than President Obama’s 10 year guaranteed US financial support for Israel. Funding would not only be on autopilot, but the US would be further drawn into Israel’s multiple wars with its neighbors. Worse even than backing up Israel in its regional wars, the wars themselves would become ours.

Americans must speak out against plans to integrate our military with any foreign country. What we should be doing is disentangling from these overseas obligations, whether they be NATO or support for Ukraine or backing Taiwan against China.

We already spend more than a trillion dollars a year on our own military and our national debt is nearing $40 trillion. Taking on the obligation to fight even more wars overseas will hasten our bankruptcy. Section 224 must be stricken from the NDAA and it is up to every American who cares about our sovereignty to demand that Congress do so.

Ron PaulRon Paul is a former Republican congressman from Texas. He was the 1988 Libertarian Party candidate for president.


Source: Ken Bank Substack

Adam Hamawy, a plastic surgeon, army veteran and conflict-zone medical worker, has won a crowded Democratic primary for an open seat in the United States House of Representatives. 

The Egyptian-born doctor’s victory puts him on track to represent New Jersey’s 12th Congressional District, a Democratic stronghold. He will face off with his Republican opponent on November 3 in the midterm elections. 

While the New Jersey primary continues a streak of progressive wins in solidly Democratic districts, Hamawy stands out from many of his peers. If elected in November, he will become the only member of Congress with firsthand experience of Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza. 

Hamawy gained national attention as part of a volunteer team of American doctors in Gaza that was unable to leave after Israel seized and closed the Rafah border crossing during the Gaza War. Army National Guard veteran and US Senator Tammy Duckworth, who credits Hamawy with saving her life when they were both serving in the Iraq War, personally intervened to help them leave. Hamawy was one of three doctors who chose to stay behind until the non-Americans on the team could depart.

Speaking to Al Jazeera in April, Hamawy recounted his experience travelling to Washington, DC, following his medical mission to the Palestinian enclave in 2024. 

“[I was] talking to lawmakers and our representatives as a witness to say: This is happening there,” Hamawy recounted. “This is real. This isn’t fake news. This isn’t just on social media. I’ve experienced it, and this is what I saw in my own eyes.” 

He received a mixed response. A handful of lawmakers spoke out against the war, citing his testimony. Others expressed private condemnation but did nothing publicly, and some closed their doors to any meeting with Hamawy. 

“This is what prompted me to run,” he said. “We need more [elected officials] that are brave, more that will actually act upon what we know is wrong.”

As a representative, Hamawy hopes he can help steer the House to confront Israel’s genocidal war and the US role in it. “I felt I had to go to Washington to fix this myself.” 

In blocking outside access, Hamawy says Israel has attempted to “build a narrative … that these are bad people that we need to bomb out of existence”. 

Hamawy is no stranger to conflict zones: He has participated in medical missions to Bosnia, Sudan, Haiti, Lebanon and Syria. 

But he described his experience in Gaza as particularly revelatory, given the US backing for Israel’s war. He remembers seeing patient after patient permanently maimed by Israeli attacks. 

“By going there and actually living it, by taking care of a child who’s come and had his arm blown off and lost his entire family, [you’re not] able to turn it off, because you have to operate on them and see them the next day,” he said. “And then you see someone else and do this consistently.” 

He added that the stress of being in the war zone was overwhelming as well. 

The experience involves “not being able to sleep, because you’re being bombed, like hour after hour, and have drones over your head 24/7. And you know that, at any point of time, something’s gonna happen,” he said. “You have really no control of your life at all.” 

Hamawy also pointed out that, back in New Jersey, residents are struggling to pay for basic services like healthcare, while Washington continues to pay for war. 

Hamawy’s political ascension has been buoyed by several high-profile endorsements, including from Senator Tammy Duckworth, who

credits the former US Army combat surgeon with saving her life when her Black Hawk helicopter was shot down in Iraq in 2004. 

Duckworth had previously advocated for Hamawy when his medical mission was temporarily blocked by Israel from exiting Gaza in 2024. 

He also gained a key endorsement in May from Senator Bernie Sanders, a progressive stalwart. His campaign benefitted, too, from a surge in spending by progressive groups, including millions in ad buys from American Priorities, a pro-Palestinian super PAC. 

The same night as Adam Hamawy’s primary victory, progressive activist and Democratic Socialist Representative Analilia Mejia, defeated her opponents in the Democratic primary to run for re-election in November. Mejia was also very outspoken about her support for Palestinian victims of genocide in Gaza.

A few months earlier Mejia soundly defeated her Republican opponent in a special election to represent the 11th Congressional District from New Jersey, delivering a victory for Democrats in the runup to this fall’s midterm elections. 

When Democrat Mikie Sherrill became New Jersey’s first Democratic woman to be elected Governor she vacated her congressional seat representing a politically competitive, suburban district in the northern part of the state. 

Progressive and Socialist Democrats were united in support of Analilia Mejia who was endorsed by Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Sanders came to New Jersey for a rally where he appeared with Mejia for a public show of support. 

The Democratic primary in New Jersey was a big win for progressive activists and Democratic Socialism. It was also a huge blow to support

among New Jersey voters for Zionist Expansionism and Israel’s war of genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. 

In his victory speech on Tuesday night, Hamawy said his win signaled a new “era” in US politics. 

“Let me be absolutely clear with you all and everyone watching today: There was once a time when this may have worked, where racist and anti-Muslim attacks could swing an election,” he said. 

“That era of American politics is over.”


This article was originally published by Ken Bank Substack; please consider supporting the original publication, and read the original version at the link above.
avatar

Ken Bank is a semi-retired business executive, part-time playwright, and freelance writer with masters degrees in business and history. He lives in New Jersey and is active in the local Democratic Party organization in support of progressive policies.

Calling Attacks on Platner ‘Politics as Usual’, Mainers Say They Have Back of Working-Class Champion

“We’re going to win on Tuesday, and we’re going to win in November, and we’re going to take power back for the people in this country,” said the US Senate candidate from Maine.



Democratic US Senate candidate Graham Platner speaks to voters at a town hall at the Elks Lodge 188 on June 7, 2026 in Portland, Maine.
(Photo by Laura Brett/Getty Images)

Julia Conley
Jun 08, 2026
COMMON DREAMS


At Democratic US Senate candidate Graham Platner’s final town hall ahead of Tuesday’s primary election in Maine, the combat veteran and oyster farmer received a warm welcome from roughly 400 attendees who appeared eager to focus on the candidate’s policy platform and issues affecting working Mainers rather than numerous attacks that have been launched against him in recent months.

Platner walked into a meeting room at an Elks Lodge in Portland, Maine’s largest city, to a standing ovation and said, as he had at a rally on Friday with Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) in Bar Harbor, that Mainers have shown they “have my back.”

“We’re going to win on Tuesday, and we’re going to win in November, and we’re going to take power back for the people in this country,” he told the crowd.



After speaking for close to an hour about issues including economic inequality, his goal of being “a voice that says no to war” in the US Senate, and his push for Medicare for All, Platner opened the floor for questions that focused on repealing Citizens United, his plan to pass a billionaire wealth tax, and the lawmakers and Senate committees the political newcomer has begun building relationships with as he aims to unseat Republican Sen. Susan Collins.

He named Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) as a lawmaker he has little in common with ideologically but with whom he shares a goal of ending “forever wars,” and listed Sens. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) as some of the other senators he hopes to work with closely.

One woman stood up to note that some in the national corporate media have appeared certain in recent days that they “know” the voters of Maine and that they are likely to turn against Platner following news stories about his past marital struggles, former relationships, comments he made online years ago, and a tattoo he got while in the Marines.

“What do people not understand about Mainers?” the voter asked.

Platner answered that he’s had conversations about economic inequality with people across the state—including at more than 80 town halls—and said that those focused on the controversies don’t understand “how clear-eyed” and “how frustrated” Maine voters are with the political status quo.

“I think a lot of folks at the national level misunderstand,” he said at one point. “The reason they keep getting everything wrong is they think this is a race about me, but it isn’t. This is a race about us. This is a race about the future of politics in Maine.”

One voter, Kurt Fedora of Buxton, told The Associated Press that he views the controversies that the national media has focused on in recent months as a smear campaign.

“They’re really reaching far to try to pin something on him. And it’s politics as usual,” Fedora told the outlet.

As Common Dreams noted Sunday, The New York Times’ reporting last week on allegations that Platner was physically aggressive in past relationships—which he denied—has not appeared to make a dent in his campaign’s fundraising. As he rallied with Khanna the day after the report came out, the campaign announced it had raised over $200,000 that day—“more money than on any day” since Gov. Janet Mills suspended her campaign in April.

Similarly, when earlier stories broke about his tattoo and Reddit posts, Platner only widened his lead over Mills in primary polls.

One attendee named Paul told Common Dreams that at the Sunday town hall, Platner had “described a system that needs to be changed,” and that the same system “is out to destroy him in any way they can” by publishing stories like one that focused on Platner’s text messages with women early in his marriage.

“There was no way I could care less about that,” he said. “I always like to say, it’s between him and his wife.”

Another supporter, Claudia, added that ahead of Tuesday’s primary election, she is “looking at the bigger picture.”

“This country is in a really dangerous state. I mean, it’s terrifying every day,” she told Common Dreams. “You want more Susan Collins? I don’t think so.”

“I really appreciated the fact that he knows that he needs to have people with whom he has a relationship in Washington and with whom he can work,” she added, turning her attention to the substance of Platner’s remarks. “I feel like he’s done a really good job of not only appreciating what so many of the issues are, but how he can engage with people down there [in DC].”

Platner emphasized that the Democratic Party has tried to unseat Collins numerous times since she took office in 1997, most recently with moderate state lawmaker Sara Gideon in 2020. Mills spoke affectionately about Collins last September, a month before she jumped into the race, saying she appreciates “everything she is doing” during President Donald Trump’s second term.

Collins has long cast herself as a “moderate” and a defender of women’s rights in particular, despite the fact that she has voted to confirm more than a dozen anti-choice judges in Trump’s second administration alone.

“We are going to beat someone that the establishment of the Democratic Party has failed to unseat for 30 years,” Platner said. “We are going to beat someone who, for years, has tried to trick us all into thinking that she’s a moderate.”

While focusing their attention on Platner’s policy platform, some in the crowd at the town hall suggested they were eager to rally for the candidate partially because of the recent attacks on his character. One attendee, Laurie Hudson, passed around a card she had made that read, “We are your Graham-ily and we’ve got your back,” asking others in the audience to sign. She presented it to Platner after his opening remarks.



Platner urged attendees to get involved not only in his campaign’s get-out-the-vote efforts in the final days of the primary campaign—by “going out into our communities and having hard conversations”—but in a larger movement powered by the working class, aimed at beating back Trump’s agenda and the corporations and dark money groups that helped pave his way to the White House by pouring billions of dollars into elections.

“Throughout history, the only thing that’s ever beaten fascism is a broad-based working-class coalition,” said Platner. “This is a race about building power the old-fashioned way, from the ground up... Join a labor union, go help out at the local food pantry, go help out at a food bank, but you’ve got to do something. Because the moment we’re in right now, it’s going to require all of us.