Monday, May 12, 2025

 

Scientists hail new ‘industrially viable technology’ that can squeeze hydrogen from seawater



University of Sharjah
Systematic illustration 

image: 

Systematic illustration of the formation process of how the new device extracts hydrogen from seawater.

view more 

Credit: Small (2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202501376




By Ifath Arwah, University of Sharjah

Researchers from the University of Sharjah claim to have developed a novel technology capable of producing clean hydrogen fuel directly from seawater, and at an industrial scale.

In a study published in the journal Small, the researchers report that they extracted hydrogen without the need to remove the mineral salts dissolved in seawater or add any chemicals.

According to the authors, the technology enables hydrogen extraction from seawater without relying on desalination plants, which require massive investments totaling hundreds of millions of dollars.

“We developed a novel, multi-layered electrode that can extract hydrogen directly from seawater efficiently and sustainably. Traditional methods face a host of problems, mainly corrosion and performance degradation caused by chloride ions in seawater,” said Dr. Tanveer Ul Haq, Assistant Professor in the Department of Chemistry, College of Sciences, University of Sharjah, and the study’s lead author.

The authors designed a specially engineered electrode which, in the words of Dr. Ul Haq, “overcomes these issues by creating a protective and reactive microenvironment that boosts performance while resisting damage.”

In a world where clean energy is no longer a luxury but a necessity, hydrogen stands out as one of the most promising solutions. Until now, scientists have primarily relied on pure water—a precious resource in many regions—to produce hydrogen.

This study addresses that challenge by introducing a new technology capable of generating hydrogen directly from seawater.

“In short, we’ve demonstrated that direct seawater electrolysis is not only possible but scalable, delivering industrial-level efficiency while protecting the electrode over long-term use,” Dr. Ul Haq added.

In their study, the researchers describe their device as a “microenvironment-engineered, multilayered electrode design for sustainable seawater electrolysis.” When in operation, the apparatus delivers “a geometric current density of 1 A cm⁻² in real seawater at an overpotential of 420 mV, with no hypochlorite formation and outstanding operational stability for 300 hours at room temperature.”

The electrode, the study notes, produces hydrogen at industrially relevant rates using untreated seawater. Nearly all the electrical input was converted into gas output, achieving a Faradaic efficiency of 98%.

“The advanced anode design achieves an industrially viable current density of 1.0 A cm⁻² at 1.65 V under standard conditions, marking a significant step toward scalable, desalination-free hydrogen production directly from seawater.”

Faradaic efficiency measures the effectiveness with which electrons participate in a given electrochemical reaction.

“We created an advanced electrode that works in real seawater without needing any pre-treatment or desalination,” said the study’s corresponding author, Yousef Haik, Professor of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering at the University of Sharjah.

“Our system generates hydrogen at industrially relevant rates—1 ampere per square centimeter—with low energy input. This could revolutionize how we think about hydrogen production in coastal regions, especially in arid countries like the UAE, where freshwater is limited but sunlight and seawater are abundant.”

The technology’s strength lies in the electrode’s advanced, multilayered structure, which not only withstands harsh seawater conditions but thrives in them. The device forms “a protective metaborate film, preventing metal dissolution and non-conductive oxide formation”—an approach that eliminates the need for energy-intensive water purification.

“This bypasses costly desalination and complex water purification, making green hydrogen production cheaper and more accessible,” said co-author Mourad Smari, a research associate at Sharjah University’s Institute of Science and Engineering.

One of the most impressive features of the system is its longevity. “It runs for over 300 hours without performance loss, resisting corrosion that usually destroys similar systems,” said Dr. Ul Haq. The study explains that the carbonate layer “acts as an electrostatic shield,” protecting the electrode’s multiple layers from dissolution.

In performance tests, the electrode achieved a turnover frequency of 139.4 s⁻¹ at 1.6 V, which the authors consider one of the highest reported for similar systems.

“In summary, the multilayered electrode architecture developed in this study provides an effective solution for efficient direct seawater electrolysis,” the study concludes. “The ultrathin nanosheet morphology, with its high surface area, facilitates substantial catalyst exposure and activity, maximizing the surface sites available for direct seawater oxidation.”

Dr. Ul Haq emphasized the technology’s potential impact on clean and sustainable energy production.

“This technology can be applied in large-scale hydrogen plants that use seawater instead of precious freshwater. Imagine solar-powered hydrogen farms along the UAE coastline, using seawater and sunlight to produce clean fuel—with zero emissions and minimal resource strain.”

Asked to explain in simple terms how the multilayered design works, Dr. Ul Haq said, “The electrode’s layered design acts like a smart filter—allowing water in, blocking corrosion, and supercharging hydrogen production.” He added that the system’s performance is largely due to how it handles chloride ions in seawater.

The carbonate functionalization repels these ions and creates a local acidic microenvironment that accelerates the oxygen evolution reaction (OER), essential for hydrogen production. The paper notes that this mechanism “enhances OER kinetics and protects against chloride attack and precipitate formation.”

The technology has already attracted interest from “clean energy startups and regional innovation hubs,” Dr. Ul Haq noted. “Our innovation transforms seawater from a challenge into a solution… This is clean hydrogen made from the sea.”

The researchers are now looking forward to large-scale deployment of their technology. “We’re now moving from lab-scale to pilot-scale testing, looking to validate the technology under real-world outdoor conditions,” Dr. Ul Haq said. “Our next goal is to develop a modular hydrogen generator powered by solar energy, tailored for use in arid, coastal regions.”

 

Faradic efficiency: corrosion potential and corrosion current density recorded before and after 300 h electrolysis, chronopotentiometry of valance band spectrum, and Raman spectrum after 300 h continuous electrolysis in alkaline seawater.

Credit

Small (2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202501376

 

New Open Access Book! “Climate change impacts and adaptation strategies in Japan”





Ibaraki University

Cover of the book 

image: 

Cover of the book

view more 

Credit: Ibaraki University



About this book

Editors.: Nobuo Mimura and Satoshi Takewaka
25chapters, 359p., Springer, 2025.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-2436-2
Download: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-96-2436-2

   This open access book presents the latest Japanese research for the projection of climate change impacts and the evaluation of adaptation policies, with a particular focus on the S-18 Project—a nationwide, interdisciplinary research initiative involving experts from various fields. The S-18 project aimed to explore how best to respond to the increasingly severe impacts of climate change. To ensure that the research outcomes could be effectively linked to adaptation measures, the project aimed to provide both short-term and long-term policy guidance to support the initiatives of national and local governments, as well as the private sector.

   Readers can get a comprehensive view of the latest knowledge and strategies to combat climate change impacts in Japan. The topics span the research framework and future scenarios for climatic and socio-economic changes, and impacts and adaptation measures in major sectors at both national and local levels. Target sectors include agriculture, forestry and fisheries, natural ecosystems, natural disasters and coastal zones, water resources, urban infrastructure, and transportation, quality of life and human health, and economic analysis of the impacts.

   The book features high-resolution spatial distribution of impacts, changes in vulnerability with localities, effects of mitigation and adaptation measures, and implications of climate change policies on society. As the world experiences increased extreme weather events, this comprehensive book is a timely reference for similar studies in other countries through the presentation of research results and lessons obtained in Japan. Researchers, policymakers, and academics in environmental science, climate policy, and related fields will find this book invaluable for understanding and addressing the multifaceted challenges of climate change adaptation and mitigation.

   Some chapters were written originally in Japanese. The English translation was facilitated by artificial intelligence. The authors later revised the content for accuracy.

Keywords

   Global warming, Impact projection, Effects of adaptation and mitigation, Climate Change Adaptation Act (Japan), Common scenarios for climate and socio-economic changes, Agriculture, forestry and fishery, Ecosystems, Natural disasters and Coastal zone, Water resource, Urban infrastructure, People’s life, Social changes, Population decline, Synergies between mitigation and adaptation

Editors

Dr. Nobuo Mimura is a Professor Emeritus at Ibaraki University and a Specially Appointed Professor at the university’s Global and Local Environment Co-creation Institute. His research areas are global environmental engineering and coastal engineering. For over 30 years, he has been deeply involved in studies on the assessment of climate change impacts and adaptation in Japan, Asia, and small island countries in the South Pacific. His work has highlighted the unique risks of the impacts in these countries and the role of adaptive actions. He also served as Lead Author, Coordinating Lead Author, and Review Editor for the second to sixth assessment reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). He has also contributed as an advisor to several Ministries of the Japanese Government as well as international bodies such as the World Bank. He has lead a strategic research project, S-18 “Comprehensive Research on Projection of Climate Change Impacts and Evaluation of Adaptation” funded by the Ministry of Environment of Japan and the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency from 2020 to 2025.

Dr. Satoshi Takewaka is a Professor at the University of Tsukuba. His research interests are coastal engineering and remote sensing. He analyzes long-term trends of sandy beach deformations due to waves, currents, and climate change. He has experience in two governmental research projects on climate change issues and was an editor and author of project book publications. In the S-18 project, he collaborates with Professor Mimura and publicizes the research project and results.

 

First five years of a child’s life provide a critical window of opportunity for preventing overweight and obesity, Dutch study suggests




European Association for the Study of Obesity




The first five years of a child’s life may be key to preventing overweight and obesity in years to come, say the authors of new research being presented at year’s European Congress on Obesity (ECO 2025).

The study found that a child’s body mass index (BMI) at the age of six is a better predictor of their risk of overweight or obesity at age 18 than their BMI at other points in their childhood.

Every one-unit increase in BMI at age six more than doubled (2.35 times) a child’s odds of being overweight or obese at 18. (BMI was adjusted for age and sex.)

The study also found that if a child with a higher BMI reached a healthier weight before the age of six, they were no longer at a higher risk of living with overweight or obesity in their late teens.

However, if they returned to a healthier BMI when they were six or older, they were still at higher risk of overweight and obesity.

This suggests that the first five years of a child’s life provide a critical window of opportunity for preventing overweight and obesity in young adulthood, says Jasmin de Groot, of Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Ms de Groot and colleagues used data from an ongoing prospective cohort study1 in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, to track the BMI trajectories of thousands of children in the Netherlands.

Weight at birth (adjusted for gestational age and sex) and BMI at age two, six, ten, 14 and 18 years was available for 3,528 participants, 52.9% of which were female.

A child’s BMI generally increases with age. For this reason, the researchers used reductions at the rate in which BMI was increasing (i.e. a BMI that was growing more slowly) as an indicator of healthy growth – and of reaching a healthier weight – rather than a reduction in BMI.

Some 32.3%, 22.3%, 24.7% and 20.6% of the 3,528 children lived with overweight or obesity at the ages of 2, 6, 10 and 14 years, respectively.

Many of these children were still in the overweight or obese range at the age of 18. Of the children with overweight or obesity at the ages of 2, 6, 10 and 14 years, 32.5%, 53.9%, 57.2%, and 70.3%, respectively, still lived with overweight or obesity at 18 years.

A higher BMI at any point in childhood, regardless of earlier BMI, was associated with a higher chance of overweight or obesity at 18 years.

A high BMI at the age of six was particularly strongly associated with overweight and obesity at 18.

However, when the researchers split each age group into three groups based on their BMI, they found that if a child in the group with the highest BMI slowed down the growth of their BMI before the age of six, their odds of living with overweight or obesity at 18 were similar to those of a child with a stable, average BMI.

Reaching a healthier weight after the age of six did not have the same effect: the children with the highest BMIs were more likely to live with overweight or obesity aged 18 regardless of how their BMI changed from the age of six onwards.

The findings, say the researchers, emphasise the importance of monitoring BMI in early childhood.

Ms de Groot adds: “We need to understand how children grow and develop if we are to help future generations grow up healthier and give every child a chance at a happy, healthy life.

“Our research assists with this by showing that a child with overweight or obesity isn’t destined to live with overweight or obesity as a young adult – and that the first five years of a child’s life provide a fantastic opportunity to intervene and prevent them experiencing overweight and obesity in the years to come.”

 

Failure to focus on covid suppression led to avoidable UK deaths, says expert



UK approach raises questions about medical and scientific advice



BMJ Group





Early in the covid-19 pandemic, the failure of UK government advisers to follow World Health Organization (WHO) advice and emerging evidence from East Asia that suppression could bring the virus under control quickly led to avoidable UK deaths, argues an expert in The BMJ today.

Suppression aims to avoid national lockdowns and maintain economic activity for most of the population by introducing surveillance systems to bring new outbreaks under control quickly, thus reducing the reproductive rate of infection (R0) to below 1 and causing the epidemic to wither.

Anthony Costello, professor of global health at University College London says, had the UK followed a suppression strategy, it might have prevented thousands of deaths. He asks why long term strategies of suppression continue to be under-recognised and calls for better governance of UK pandemic science advice.

In January 2020 the global threat from covid-19 was clear and the WHO was advising countries to focus on rapid suppression to avoid immediate threat from the spread of the new coronavirus, he explains.

Yet while Greece, Germany, Norway, and Ireland took steps to follow these recommendations, the UK government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) unanimously chose a response based on pandemic flu that ignored the different characteristics of coronavirus transmission.

Nor did SAGE change its advice after reports of rapidly falling cases and infection rates in several East Asian countries that had focused on suppression. Instead, in March 2020, the government published its “contain, delay, research, mitigate” plan based on influenza that would allow the virus to spread to achieve “herd immunity.”

SAGE’s unwavering decision to recommend a response based on influenza has continued to be defended by its co-chairs, Chris Whitty, England’s chief medical officer, and Patrick Vallance, chief scientific adviser until 2023, notes Costello. Yet their defence is based on three arguably mistaken assumptions: that covid could not have been suppressed, that a huge second wave could follow even if it was, and that suppression required prolonged national lockdowns.

He acknowledges that SAGE faced a difficult and fast changing situation in early 2020 but says its advice to government was “flawed” and “arose from systems failure.”

For instance, SAGE did not recommend rapid expansion of testing, form plans to mobilise community health workers as contact tracers at scale to hotspot areas and across district health protection teams, or advise on key financial and support measures for effective self-isolation, he writes.

“Had the UK followed the same strategy and achieved the same excess cumulative death rate by March 2024 as South Korea, 69 instead of 344 deaths per 100,000, it might have prevented up to 180,000 UK deaths.”

The BMJ asked Chris Whitty and Patrick Vallance why they had not recommended a suppression response, given WHO advice and emerging evidence early in the pandemic; about SAGE’s lack of independent experts; why they were not more outspoken about health harming policies; and whether they stand by the recommendations they made not to focus on suppression, but had not received a response by the time of publication.

Costello points out that, five years on, many of the people who developed the UK’s flawed response are still in post; they have not changed their views on suppression, and little has been done to improve government pandemic advice committees or to introduce detailed governance rules for the UK’s future pandemic response and resilience. 

“The covid inquiry and the UK medical establishment should properly critique this public health failure,” he concludes.

[Ends]

 

Can the U.S. develop a strong national science diplomacy strategy?


Summary author: Zachary Graber


American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)




In a new editorial in the AAAS publication Science & Diplomacy, Kimberly Montgomery, Director of International Affairs and Science Diplomacy at AAAS, reflects on whether the United States should develop a national science diplomacy strategy amid significant change to U.S. federal policy. Montgomery believes that the Trump administration should develop such a strategy – to help define a vision and direction for the U.S. It should outline how related policies “can advance U.S. diplomatic objectives, including fostering economic growth,” she writes. “And that strategy should detail how it will work with the private sector.” But for this to happen effectively, says Montgomery, the U.S. needs a stable and flourishing scientific ecosystem. She highlights challenges – including budget cuts for domestic science research, the firing of thousands of U.S. federal scientists, and the steep reduction of foreign aid that supports collaborative science projects abroad. “I am an optimist,” writes Montgomery, “but I am very concerned by the enactment of policies that harm the U.S. scientific ecosystem and damage our relationships with our allies.” Montgomery concludes: “Without changing course, I fear the question I will start being asked is not whether I agree with the diplomatic objectives that the Trump administration is pursuing…but rather whether the United States can develop a strong national science diplomacy strategy at all.”