Saturday, June 06, 2026

 

Biochar can reshape how soils respond to warming, but the effect depends on the soil



New study shows that wood biochar may lower the temperature sensitivity of nitrous oxide emissions in agricultural soil while increasing it in forest soil




Biochar Editorial Office, Shenyang Agricultural University

Biochar modulates temperature sensitivity of soil N2O emissions: soil-specific mechanisms 

image: 

Biochar modulates temperature sensitivity of soil N2O emissions: soil-specific mechanisms

view more 

Credit: Siyu Luo, Zhibo Li, Jing Hu & Xiaolin Liao





As the planet warms, soils may release more nitrous oxide, a powerful greenhouse gas linked to agriculture, fertilizer use, and microbial nitrogen cycling. A new study published in Biochar shows that biochar, a carbon-rich material made by heating biomass with limited oxygen, can change how strongly soil nitrous oxide emissions respond to rising temperatures. But the effect is not one-size-fits-all.

Researchers tested two contrasting soils, agricultural soil and forest soil, with two types of biochar made from wood and rice husk. They applied the biochars at two rates, 1% and 3%, and incubated the soils at 10 °C, 20 °C, and 30 °C. The team focused on Q10, a measure of how much a biological process changes when temperature rises by 10 °C.

The study found that nitrous oxide emissions increased with warming in both soils, but forest soil was more temperature-sensitive than agricultural soil. Q10 values were higher in forest soil, ranging from 1.63 to 2.84, compared with 1.13 to 1.63 in agricultural soil. This suggests that warming may have a stronger effect on nitrous oxide release in soils with more active nitrogen cycling and higher nutrient availability.

“Biochar is often discussed as a climate mitigation tool, but our findings show that its effects depend strongly on the soil environment,” said corresponding author Xiaolin Liao. “The same biochar treatment can push soil nitrogen processes in different directions depending on whether the soil is agricultural or forest soil.”

Among all treatments, only high-rate wood biochar significantly changed the temperature sensitivity of nitrous oxide emissions. In agricultural soil, it lowered Q10, meaning that nitrous oxide emissions became less responsive to warming. The researchers found that this treatment strongly reduced nitrate availability and weakened the temperature response of nitrate, creating greater substrate limitation for nitrous oxide production.

In forest soil, however, high-rate wood biochar had the opposite effect. It increased Q10, even though biochar generally reduced total nitrous oxide emissions in that soil. The authors suggest that wood biochar may have altered short-term nitrate retention and strengthened the coupling between nitrification and nitrate-consuming processes, making nitrous oxide emissions more sensitive to temperature changes.

“This result is important because it shows that reducing total emissions and reducing warming sensitivity are not always the same goal,” said first author Siyu Luo. “A treatment may suppress nitrous oxide emissions overall, while still changing how emissions respond to future warming.”

The team also measured soil pH, dissolved organic carbon, ammonium, nitrate, microbial biomass carbon, and several nitrogen-related microbial functional genes. Their path modeling showed that temperature was the dominant driver of nitrous oxide emissions, acting through changes in substrate availability, soil pH, and microbial genes. Biochar acted as a secondary modulator, shaping the soil conditions that control microbial nitrogen transformations.

The findings add nuance to the growing interest in biochar as a climate-smart soil amendment. Rather than applying biochar with a universal expectation of greenhouse gas mitigation, the study suggests that soil type, biochar feedstock, and application rate should all be considered when designing biochar strategies under climate change.

“Our study highlights the need for soil-specific biochar management,” Liao said. “To use biochar effectively for nitrous oxide mitigation, we need to understand not only whether it lowers emissions, but also how it changes the sensitivity of those emissions to warming.”

The research provides new mechanistic insight into how biochar, temperature, and microbial nitrogen cycling interact, offering guidance for more targeted soil management in a warming world.

 

=== 

Journal Reference: Luo, S., Li, Z., Hu, J. et al. Biochar modulates temperature sensitivity of soil N2O emissions: soil-specific mechanisms. Biochar 8, 81 (2026).   

https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-026-00591-2   

CLASS CONCIOUSNESS VS POLITICS

New bipartisan report finds that Americans share the same struggles despite deep political divides



State-by-state analysis from the State of the Nation Project at Tulane University shows worsening mental health, declining trust and falling life satisfaction in nearly every state




Tulane University

State of the States report cover 

image: 

The new State of the States report, released by the State of the Nation Project at Tulane University, analyzed more than three decades of data for all 50 states and the District of Columbia, to provide a long-term progress report for each state.

view more 

Credit: Tulane University





As the United States approaches its 250th anniversary amid deep political division, a major new bipartisan report aims to get consensus on a fundamental question: How are we really doing as a country? 

The new “State of the States” report, released by the State of the Nation Project at Tulane University, analyzed more than three decades of data for all 50 states and the District of Columbia, to provide a long-term progress report for each state.

Drawing on more than 4,000 indicators, researchers ranked states across 31 measures covering life satisfaction, trust in their neighbors and institutions, civil liberties, education, environment, children and families, economy, workforce, physical and mental health, inequality and more.

“At a time of such polarization, misinformation, and pessimism, it’s important to get a clear sense of how we’re really doing on what matters most. It turns out that states—red and blue—mostly share the same struggles,” said Douglas Harris, director of the State of the Nation Project and an economics professor in the School of Liberal Arts at Tulane. “This is the first report of its kind to examine not only economic outcomes but social, civic and personal outcomes by state.”

The bipartisan group behind the report includes researchers and policy experts from seven of the nation’s leading think tanks across the political spectrum as well as advisors to the past five U.S. presidents, Democrats and Republicans. The project builds on the original State of the Nation report released in 2025, which examined how the United States compares with other countries on similar measures. This new report shifts the focus inward, analyzing how those trends are playing out across states. 

The report found significant regional divides. States in the western Midwest and New England generally ranked highest overall in the most recent year across the measures examined, while Southern states ranked near the bottom. Minnesota had the strongest average ranking across all measures, while Louisiana ranked last.

Southern states ranked in the middle on personal well-being but especially low on trust in institutions. Many of those trust measures pertain to government institutions, suggesting that Southern states show low levels of trust even in their own state and local governments. Mountain states, meanwhile, had high levels of trust but the lowest levels of personal well-being.

One of the report’s central findings is that most states are moving in the same direction in key areas, but often in troubling ways. The report found that no state is improving on the following eight measures: life satisfaction, adult depression, youth depression, fatal overdoses, trust in the federal government, income inequality, long-term unemployment rate and hourly earnings growth. A bright spot is that every state has been improving on two measures: child mortality and total real state income.

While states are mostly becoming more alike, they are growing further apart in two key areas — and some states are falling behind much faster than others. Economic gaps between states are widening as measured by income levels and hourly earnings. Well-being gaps are also rising in measures like trust in other people, trust in science, rates of depression, suicide and overdoses.     

“While all states are struggling with mental health, some states are getting hit harder than others,” said Anna Lembke, a leading psychiatrist at Stanford University and co-author of the report.

The report found an increasingly unhappy nation. Across the country, people are reporting that they feel worse about their lives, more isolated, less trusting and more mentally distressed. Of      225 possible opportunities for states to show improvement on six self-reported well-being measures, the researchers found only 12 cases of improvement.

One of the main findings in the original State of the Nation report, highlighted by The New York Times, was that America’s economic strength has not translated into higher average levels of well-being. The new report shows that this is true across states as well. States with higher personal incomes per capita were not doing better on measures of personal well-being — life satisfaction or depression.      

The State of the States report, funded by Tulane and the university’s Murphy Institute, is the first to examine such a wide range of measures at the state level. 

“It’s not easy to capture how states are doing. This endeavor brought together a healthy mix of expertise and perspective, yet wound up with a remarkable degree of consensus as to what measures are most fundamental,” said Frederick Hess, a political scientist and education expert at the American Enterprise Institute. 

By comparing long-term trends across the country, the project aims to help policymakers, civic leaders and residents see what’s happening in their own states and learn from others. “At the state level, we encourage you to ask, where is my state excelling and failing?” the authors wrote. “What is different about my state that might explain such successes and failures? … This is how we see the path from data to real solutions.” 

The report does not prescribe specific policy solutions. Instead, the authors say their goal is to establish a shared set of facts at a time when Americans increasingly disagree not only about politics, but about the condition of the country itself. “We have to first ask, how are we doing? Then, we can move on to, how do we get better?” the authors wrote.

The full report and state-by-state findings are available at https://stateofnation.org

SPACE/COSMOS

Beyond Disclosure Day: The real-world protocols



At the heart of the new rules is a reaffirmation of a core scientific principle: “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”



SETI Institute

seti-institute-pr-pdp-abstract-1200px 

image: 

Is there life beyond Earth?

view more 

Credit: SETI Institute



June 5, 2026, Mountain View, CA –The IAA SETI Committee announced today updated rules for evaluating and revealing the detection of extraterrestrial intelligence.

A University of Manchester astronomer has led a major international overhaul of the rules that would govern how scientists announce evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence to the world.

Professor Michael Garrett, the Sir Bernard Lovell Chair of Astrophysics, chaired a global effort to update the long-standing “post-detection protocols” used by researchers involved in the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI). The updated guidelines have now been formally ratified by the International Academy of Astronautics (IAA).

The revised Declaration of Principles marks the first major update to the protocols in more than 15 years and reflects a media landscape transformed by social media, artificial intelligence and the 24-hour news cycle.

Acknowledging that any credible detection of extraterrestrial technology would be a transformative event for humanity, the new Declaration establishes a rigorous framework for verification, transparency and global risk communication.

"The information environment we operate in today is vastly more complex than it was in 2010," said Garrett, Chair of the IAA SETI Committee.  "In an era of deepfakes, automated misinformation, and instant global connectivity, a single unverified claim could trigger confusion or panic. These new protocols ensure that scientists maintain the highest standards of evidence before making announcements to the world."

Adapting to a new era of SETI research

SETI and Technosignature research have expanded significantly since the previous protocols were adopted in 2010. Scientists now investigate the entire electromagnetic spectrum, including excess infrared heat signatures from megastructures, optical laser emission, and even multi-messenger signals. The updated Declaration explicitly recognises this broader approach.

It also addresses other modern challenges, including protections for researchers, acknowledging that scientists involved in potential detection could face harassment, doxxing, or intense media scrutiny. It further acknowledges the risk of viral rumours, ensuring verified data is distinguished from hoaxes or terrestrial interference.

Verification before announcement

At the heart of the new rules is a reaffirmation of a core scientific principle: “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.”

Under the revised protocols, no public announcement should be made until a signal or artifact has been rigorously authenticated by independent organisations using different instrumentation.

"We do not shout “alien” the moment we see a strange blip," Garrett added. "The scientific method demands we check, check again, and then ask others to check. Only when we have reached a consensus that a signal is credible do we bring it to the world."

The 'No Reply' Consensus

While the protocols outline how to share news of a discovery, they remain firm on one critical restriction: No reply should be sent.

The Declaration reaffirms the enduring principle that transmitting a response to an extraterrestrial intelligence is a decision that belongs to all of humanity and should only take place following international consultations, specifically through the United Nations.

What happens next

With the updated Declaration ratified by the IAA Board, the aim is to see the document lodged with other stakeholders, including the United Nations. A formal technical presentation of the protocols to the wider community, including the scientific press, will take place at the International Astronautical Congress (IAC) later this year in Türkiye.

“The release of these updated rules and protocols marks an important step in acknowledging both the radically different media landscape that science functions within today, and the vastly expanded efforts in terms of technology and resources being deployed in the search for intelligent life beyond Earth” said Bill Diamond, President and CEO of the SETI Institute and IAA SETI Committee member. “We applaud Prof Garrett’s leadership in developing these new protocols and the IAA for their ratification.”

The IAA SETI Committee will also establish a permanent Post-Detection Sub-Committee, bringing together experts in social science, law, and ethics, to advise on the longer-term societal implications of a confirmed discovery.

The full document is available at: https://iaaspace.org/wp-content/uploads/iaa/Scientific%20Activity/iaasetideclaration.pdf  

About the SETI Institute

Founded in 1984, the SETI Institute is a non-profit, multi-disciplinary research and education organization whose mission is to lead humanity’s quest to understand the origins and prevalence of life and intelligence in the Universe and to share that knowledge with the world. Our research encompasses the physical and biological sciences and leverages expertise in data analytics, machine learning and advanced signal detection technologies. The SETI Institute is a distinguished research partner for industry, academia and government agencies, including NASA and NSF.

Contact information

Rebecca McDonald
Director of Communications
SETI Institute
rmcdonald@seti.org

Contact: Prof. Michael Garrett, IAA SETI Committee Chair.

About the IAA SETI Committee
The IAA SETI Committee is the world’s primary international body dedicated to the scientific, technical, and societal aspects of the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence.


X-ray telescopes on a satellite can map the Moon’s surface chemistry in a few years



Simulations demonstrate feasibility of lunar geology breakthrough



Tokyo Metropolitan University

X-ray Fluorescence Imaging of the Moon. 

image: 

X-ray Fluorescence Imaging of the Moon. The team’s new compact and lightweight imaging unit can be installed on a long-term satellite mission. Their simulations show that a comprehensive map of the entire surface might be produced in a few years.

view more 

Credit: Tokyo Metropolitan University





Tokyo, Japan – Researchers from Tokyo Metropolitan University have used simulations to show that a newly developed, compact X-ray telescope could be used to map the chemical composition of the entire Moon surface, a vital breakthrough for understanding its geological evolution. Detailed modeling of the detector and a realistic satellite mission show that two years would be enough to map five key elements, while an array of five-by-five detectors could improve resolution and get results faster.

 

The geological evolution of the Moon remains a mystery to scientists. This reflects how challenging it is to get accurate information, for example, a complete map of the geochemistry of the lunar surface. Since we cannot readily go and collect samples from anywhere, scientists use a technology known as X-ray fluorescence imaging, where detectors directed at the Moon are used to pick up X-rays released by specific elements when they are hit by solar rays.

While observations during the Apollo and Chandrayaan missions have successfully yielded partial maps, we are nowhere near a comprehensive map which might illuminate lunar geology. This is due to significant technical challenges, including a lack of sufficient illumination by solar rays during the lifetime of a mission, and degradation of the detector. The illumination issue is particularly pronounced in polar regions, where solar X-rays are much weaker.

To overcome these challenges, a team led by Airi Toida and Prof. Yuichiro Ezoe at Tokyo Metropolitan University proposes the use of a compact X-ray telescope which could be mounted on a satellite mission around the Moon. A telescope would enable wide area observation of the lunar surface during powerful solar flares. While conventional X-ray telescopes are prohibitively heavy and large, the team’s newly designed compact unit, intended for observations of the Earth’s magnetosphere, weighs in at less than ten kilograms and might be easily deployed as part of long-term satellite observation. The detector has also been tested under significantly more severe radiation environments than lunar orbit, realizing robust, wide-area, high resolution imaging of the lunar surface over extended mission durations.

Now, the team have incorporated the specifications of their X-ray telescope into a numerical simulation to see whether a satellite mission might successfully map the lunar surface. Assuming 300 solar flares per year and a single telescope on a satellite mission orbiting the Moon, they found that they could map the whole lunar surface for five elements (oxygen, iron, magnesium, aluminum, silicon) over two years with a grid size of 70 x 70 kilometers. Their telescope unit is so compact that it is feasible to have a five-by-five array of them on a single satellite. The team’s simulations also revealed that this 25-telescope system might reduce the mission time down to a year, with a map of sodium as well with two years, both with a grid size of 30 x 30 kilometers.

If either is realized, it would be the first complete map of elemental abundance over the whole surface of the Moon, a revolutionary step forward for understanding lunar geology.

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 21H04972.

Insulin costs and use by US Medicare beneficiaries after the inflation reduction act out-of-pocket cap


JAMA Network




About The Study:

The Medicare $35 insulin out-of-pocket cap implemented in 2023 decreased and stabilized insulin out-of-pocket cost, increasing insulin use for people with previously high out-of-pocket cost. These findings can inform the design of policies to boost insulin access among users with high out-of-pocket cost. 


Corresponding Author: To contact the corresponding author, Rebecca Myerson, PhD, email Rebecca.myerson@emory.edu.

To access the embargoed study: Visit our For The Media website at this link https://media.jamanetwork.com/

(doi:10.1001/jama.2026.5975)

Editor’s Note: Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, conflict of interest and financial disclosures, and funding and support.

#  #  #

Media advisory: This study is being presented at the 2026 American Diabetes Association’s Scientific Sessions.

Embed this link to provide your readers free access to the full-text article 

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.2026.5975?guestAccessKey=0c80bdb6-595e-45b1-97bd-c5a714f0c368&utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_content=tfl&utm_term=060626