Violent protests continue in Bengal amid warning, appeal; over 300 arrested
Over 300 people were arrested as violent protests over the citizenship law refused to die down, amid warning by state authorities and appeal from Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee.
Press Trust of India Kolkata December 16, 2019
Incidents of violence were reported from several districts across West Bengal with sources saying over 300 people have been arrested so far. (PTI)
Road and rail blockades continued in West Bengal on Monday as violent protests over the citizenship law refused to die down, amid warning by state authorities and appeal from Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, even as over 300 people were arrested.
The TMC supremo, who led a mega rally from Red Road to Jorasanko Thakur Bari, the ancestral house of Nobel laureate Rabindranath Tagore in north Kolkata, urged the agitators to not indulge in vandalism and arson, and said it will only undermine the very motive of the protest.
She also blamed some powers from outside West Bengal "acting as friends" of the Muslim community for vandalism and arson, in an apparent reference to Asaduddin Owaisi's AIMIM.
"If you indulge in violence, you cause a lot of inconvenience to the common people. Those who support your cause gets angry, and you would lose their support," Banerjee said.
Notwithstanding the appeal, incidents of violence were reported from several districts across the state with sources saying over 300 people have been arrested so far.
The protesters blocked thoroughfares in East Midnapore, Murshidabad, Malda, Nadia and North 24 Parganas
districts, inconveniencing hundreds of commuters, officials said.
In Malda, the agitators protested outside Shamsi railway station. In Rajarhat area of North 24 Paraganas, protesters blocked roads and also torched tyres on the Biswa Bangla Sarani.
In Bakra area of the Howrah district, protesters hurled stones at police personnel who then baton-charged and lobbed tear gas shells to disperse the mob.
In West Midnapore district's Daspur, protestors shouted slogans, burnt copies of the amended Citizenship Act and blockade roads, setting tyres on fire.
The protesters also blocked National Highway 12 in Nadia district. In Nakasipara area, they gathered in large numbers and blocked roads.
Several express and local trains were cancelled or delayed as a result of the protests.
A railways spokesperson said demonstrators blocked the tracks in Sealdah-Diamond Harbour and Sealdah-Namkhana sectors.
Train services in Tamluk-Haldia section of South Eastern Railway were also disrupted due to a blockade at Basulya Sutahata station. Haldia-Howrah EMU local was detained, while Howrah-Haldia EMU local was short terminated at Panskura.
Train services in Howrah-Amta section were also disrupted for about four hours, leading to the cancellation of some EMU locals.
The chief minister alleged that a few people were paid by the BJP to perpetrate violence, even as she reiterated that citizenship law and the proposed NRC will not be enforced in the state.
"As long as I am alive, I will never implement the citizenship law or NRC in the state. You can very well dismiss my government or put me behind bars but I will never implement this black law. We will continue to protest democratically till this law is scrapped. If they want to implement it in Bengal they will have to do it over my dead body," she said hitting out at the Centre.
BJP president Dilip Ghosh said the kind of violent protests that are taking place in the state clearly show that there is a need for implementing NRC and the citizenship law.
Denouncing the "communal politics" of the BJP and the ruling TMC, the CPI(M)-led Left Front took out peace rallies in various parts of the state.
Leader of the Congress in Lok Sabha Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury visited some of the damaged railway stations in Murshidabad, his hometown, and hit out at the state government, saying it has failed in controlling the violence.
"The police and district administration are not taking any action against the agitators because there is no instruction from the state government to do so," he said.
Senior Congress leader and MP Pradip Bhattacharya demanded that the state government should immediately convene an all-party meeting in order to resolve the crisis.
Students of the the Jadavpur University and Presidency varsity took out separate rallies in the state capital, condemning the police action inside the Jamia Millia Islamia campus in Delhi.
Internet services continued to remain suspended in Malda, Uttar Dinajpur, Murshidabad, Howrah, North 24 Parganas and parts of South 24 Parganas.
The West Bengal government has asked media houses to exercise caution while reporting incidents of violence in the state.
It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)
Monday, December 16, 2019
Greenfield Park councillor speaks out about alleged abuse by former Montreal police officer and coach
BY ANNABELLE OLIVIER GLOBAL NEWS
Posted December 4, 2019 2:35 pm
VIDEO Warning: This story contains details of alleged assault that may be disturbing to some readers.
Longueuil police have arrested a former Montreal police officer who was also a former coach for minor league hockey in Greenfield Park, on Montreal's south shore.
Police have met with four alleged victims. As Dan Spector reports, a fifth alleged victim came forward Wednesday and police believe there are others living elsewhere in Canada and possibly in the United States.
Greenfield Park borough councillor Wade Wilson has come forward as an alleged victim of a retired Montreal police officer and minor hockey coach, who was arrested this week for the alleged sexual abuse of four minors.
Longueuil police put out a call for other potential victims of 71-year-old François Lamarre to come forward on Wednesday morning.
Wilson, a longtime borough councillor, felt compelled to speak out.
“I’m basically here to say that I’m also one of the victims. Not one of the original four victims, but I am one of the victims,” Wilson told Global News.
“We all knew him — that he was an actual police officer — so he had our trust. He was a great athlete and we thought a friend.”
Wilson said he kept silent about what he alleges happened to him as a young boy until now and pushed it out of mind. He alleges Lamarre would invite him into his car with the premise of going out for ice cream or chicken.
“He would get in the car with you, start wrestling with you and fondling you,” he said.
He said he’s grateful to the four complainants who approached police.
“It’s now out in the open and I’m not ashamed of it,” he said.
“I would suggest that any other citizens that have to deal with this issue come forward. There’s help there for you and we have to put an end to this type of old behaviour.”
“If there’s anything we can do, services for these victims will be provided by the city, I’m also here to sit down and talk.”
Greenfield Park borough councillor Wade Wilson has come forward as an alleged victim of a retired Montreal police officer and minor hockey coach, who was arrested this week for the alleged sexual abuse of four minors.
Longueuil police put out a call for other potential victims of 71-year-old François Lamarre to come forward on Wednesday morning.
Wilson, a longtime borough councillor, felt compelled to speak out.
“I’m basically here to say that I’m also one of the victims. Not one of the original four victims, but I am one of the victims,” Wilson told Global News.
“I feel it’s my duty as an elected official to come forward and be there to support and help in any way possible.”TWEET THISWilson said he met Lamarre when he was around 11 or 12 years old — some 45 years ago.
READ MORE: Longueuil police search for potential victims after arrest of ex-Montreal police officer, hockey coach“We always saw him down at the arena,” Wilson recounted.
“We all knew him — that he was an actual police officer — so he had our trust. He was a great athlete and we thought a friend.”
Wilson said he kept silent about what he alleges happened to him as a young boy until now and pushed it out of mind. He alleges Lamarre would invite him into his car with the premise of going out for ice cream or chicken.
“He would get in the car with you, start wrestling with you and fondling you,” he said.
“I guess at the time I didn’t realize how bad it actually was. We always fought him off type of thing.”TWEET THISFor Wilson, digging up the memories has been painful, but he feels he’s doing the right thing.
He said he’s grateful to the four complainants who approached police.
“It’s now out in the open and I’m not ashamed of it,” he said.
“I would suggest that any other citizens that have to deal with this issue come forward. There’s help there for you and we have to put an end to this type of old behaviour.”
“If there’s anything we can do, services for these victims will be provided by the city, I’m also here to sit down and talk.”
In a joint statement with Wilson, Greenfield Park borough president Robert Myles also applauded the courage of the alleged victims.
“No one should have to go though what these young kids went through,” he said.
“It takes a lot of courage for victims to denounce the perpetrator of sexual abuse.”
“Option Longueuil has posted on its Facebook a list of organisations that are available to members of the community that can provide assistance. Copies of this list will be made available at the borough office as well.”
Lamarre faces charges of gross indecency, indecent exposure, sexual assault, sexual touching and invitation to sexual touching involving four complainants.
None of these allegations have been proven in court. Lamarre is scheduled to appear at the Longueuil courthouse on Dec. 19.
Police arrested Lamarre on Tuesday for questioning, but he was released under several conditions, including not having contact with minors or alleged victims.
He is also barred from going to parks, arenas and community centres — and he cannot be near schools.
— With files from Global’s Olivia O’Malley, Dan Spector, Kalina Laframboise
© 2019 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.
“No one should have to go though what these young kids went through,” he said.
“It takes a lot of courage for victims to denounce the perpetrator of sexual abuse.”
READ MORE: Montreal man charged after alleged sexual assault in Mattawa, Ont., police sayThe community is available to provide support to survivors, he added.
“Option Longueuil has posted on its Facebook a list of organisations that are available to members of the community that can provide assistance. Copies of this list will be made available at the borough office as well.”
Lamarre faces charges of gross indecency, indecent exposure, sexual assault, sexual touching and invitation to sexual touching involving four complainants.
None of these allegations have been proven in court. Lamarre is scheduled to appear at the Longueuil courthouse on Dec. 19.
Police arrested Lamarre on Tuesday for questioning, but he was released under several conditions, including not having contact with minors or alleged victims.
He is also barred from going to parks, arenas and community centres — and he cannot be near schools.
— With files from Global’s Olivia O’Malley, Dan Spector, Kalina Laframboise
© 2019 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.
INVESTIGATIONS
Canada has a secret program that grants visas to war criminals, terrorists, security threats
BY BRIAN HILL GLOBAL NEWS
Posted December 16, 2019
WATCH: Immigration lawyer concerned about ‘secret’ visa program
Three months before he boarded a plane in Cairo and six months before he made a refugee claim in Toronto, Canadian security officials deemed retired Brig.-Gen. Khaled Saber Abdelhamed Zahw “inadmissible” to Canada because of national security concerns.
Zahw was a “high-ranking” member of Egypt’s military when it orchestrated a coup of President Mohamed Morsi’s government in 2013, according to the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA).
An inadmissibility finding would keep most people out of Canada, but it didn’t stop Zahw and his wife from obtaining valid visitor visas from the Canadian embassy in Egypt in April 2015.
This is because, according to internal government documents obtained by Global News, Canada has a secret program that allows certain “high-profile” foreign nationals who would otherwise be barred from entering the country due to national security concerns, war crimes, human rights violations and organized crime to be granted special “public policy” entry visas so long as it is in Canada’s “national interest.”
But exactly what “national interest” means in relation to this policy and how the government decides who gets this kind of visa is unclear.
That’s because there’s almost no information available about the program, and the government refuses to answer questions.
Details of Zahw’s immigration file, including internal government documents detailing the secretive visa policy, were submitted to the Federal Court when Zahw challenged the government’s efforts to block him from making a refugee claim.
Zahw sponsored by National Defence
In Zahw’s case, visitor visas were issued after a senior official from the Department of National Defence (DND) in Ottawa wrote a letter to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) saying Zahw and his wife should be given visas to avoid upsetting Canada’s relationship with Egypt’s military.
This type of “national interest letter” can be issued by any federal department or the head of a Canadian mission abroad, such as an ambassador or high commissioner, according to an unpublished government “operational bulletin” contained in Zahw’s Federal Court file.
It’s also unclear if Zahw knew he could have been barred from entering Canada or that he was given a special kind of visa exempting him from national security concerns.
The government’s internal operational bulletin says immigration managers and visa officers at foreign embassies — those who typically approve visas — may notify federal departments of cases in which refusing a visa could have “national interest considerations.”
Senior officials from these departments may then decide to write a national interest letter “sponsoring” the applicant and requesting that IRCC waive any security concerns.
Canada has a secret program that grants visas to war criminals, terrorists, security threats
BY BRIAN HILL GLOBAL NEWS
Posted December 16, 2019
WATCH: Immigration lawyer concerned about ‘secret’ visa program
Three months before he boarded a plane in Cairo and six months before he made a refugee claim in Toronto, Canadian security officials deemed retired Brig.-Gen. Khaled Saber Abdelhamed Zahw “inadmissible” to Canada because of national security concerns.
Zahw was a “high-ranking” member of Egypt’s military when it orchestrated a coup of President Mohamed Morsi’s government in 2013, according to the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA).
READ MORE: Saddam Hussein cabinet minister made refugee claim so Canada could pay for dialysis treatments
An inadmissibility finding would keep most people out of Canada, but it didn’t stop Zahw and his wife from obtaining valid visitor visas from the Canadian embassy in Egypt in April 2015.
This is because, according to internal government documents obtained by Global News, Canada has a secret program that allows certain “high-profile” foreign nationals who would otherwise be barred from entering the country due to national security concerns, war crimes, human rights violations and organized crime to be granted special “public policy” entry visas so long as it is in Canada’s “national interest.”
READ MORE: Canada’s border agency ‘cancels’ arrest warrants for people it wants to deport but cannot find
But exactly what “national interest” means in relation to this policy and how the government decides who gets this kind of visa is unclear.
That’s because there’s almost no information available about the program, and the government refuses to answer questions.
Details of Zahw’s immigration file, including internal government documents detailing the secretive visa policy, were submitted to the Federal Court when Zahw challenged the government’s efforts to block him from making a refugee claim.
Zahw sponsored by National Defence
In Zahw’s case, visitor visas were issued after a senior official from the Department of National Defence (DND) in Ottawa wrote a letter to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) saying Zahw and his wife should be given visas to avoid upsetting Canada’s relationship with Egypt’s military.
This type of “national interest letter” can be issued by any federal department or the head of a Canadian mission abroad, such as an ambassador or high commissioner, according to an unpublished government “operational bulletin” contained in Zahw’s Federal Court file.
CBSA cancels arrest warrants for people it can’t find
These letters, the bulletin shows, are valid for up to 24 months, are good for multiple trips to Canada — including personal and official travel — and are issued when the CBSA has completed a security screening and determined that the “risk/danger” to Canada is low.
“It is in our interest to maintain constructive relations with members of the Egyptian military as these relationships enable execution of Canadian Armed Forces operations in the region, most notably Operation CALUMET,” read a letter sent by DND Assistant Deputy Minister for Policy Gordon Venner prior to Zahw being given a visa.
“It is for this reason we would request that [Zahw] and his spouse be issued the appropriate visas,” Venner wrote.
The government, meanwhile, will not provide any details about the visa policy or the criteria it uses to decide who is given this kind of special exemption.
A review of annual reports submitted to Parliament by IRCC — which contain few details about the policy — shows that 3,000 of these visas were issued between 2010 and 2017.
The government would not say how many of these visas were issued for each category of inadmissibility, nor would it say what countries the recipients came from.
“The information requested in this media request is exempt under section 15 of the Access to Information Act, as it could be injurious to the relationship with our international partners,” said IRCC spokesperson Rémi Larivière in a written statement.
The only other details the government would provide about the policy is that it was created to “advance Canada’s national interests while continuing to ensure the safety of Canadians” and that recipients of these special visas can work, study and travel in Canada.
Zahw likely unaware of exemption
In January 2015, the same month he reportedly retired from Egypt’s military, Zahw and his wife applied for permission to travel to Canada.
Immigration records show their application was then transferred to the CBSA’s national security screening division, at which point Zahw was flagged for inadmissibility.
These letters, the bulletin shows, are valid for up to 24 months, are good for multiple trips to Canada — including personal and official travel — and are issued when the CBSA has completed a security screening and determined that the “risk/danger” to Canada is low.
“It is in our interest to maintain constructive relations with members of the Egyptian military as these relationships enable execution of Canadian Armed Forces operations in the region, most notably Operation CALUMET,” read a letter sent by DND Assistant Deputy Minister for Policy Gordon Venner prior to Zahw being given a visa.
“It is for this reason we would request that [Zahw] and his spouse be issued the appropriate visas,” Venner wrote.
READ MORE: Refugee judge asks woman why her husband wouldn’t ‘just kill’ her
The government, meanwhile, will not provide any details about the visa policy or the criteria it uses to decide who is given this kind of special exemption.
A review of annual reports submitted to Parliament by IRCC — which contain few details about the policy — shows that 3,000 of these visas were issued between 2010 and 2017.
The government would not say how many of these visas were issued for each category of inadmissibility, nor would it say what countries the recipients came from.
“The information requested in this media request is exempt under section 15 of the Access to Information Act, as it could be injurious to the relationship with our international partners,” said IRCC spokesperson Rémi Larivière in a written statement.
The only other details the government would provide about the policy is that it was created to “advance Canada’s national interests while continuing to ensure the safety of Canadians” and that recipients of these special visas can work, study and travel in Canada.
Zahw likely unaware of exemption
In January 2015, the same month he reportedly retired from Egypt’s military, Zahw and his wife applied for permission to travel to Canada.
Immigration records show their application was then transferred to the CBSA’s national security screening division, at which point Zahw was flagged for inadmissibility.
REFUGEE JUDGES ARE NOT REAL JUDGES READ MORE: Refugee judge who asked woman why husband didn’t ‘just kill’ her to face internal review31How DND became aware of Zahw’s application, and that it could be rejected, is unclear.
It’s also unclear if Zahw knew he could have been barred from entering Canada or that he was given a special kind of visa exempting him from national security concerns.
The government’s internal operational bulletin says immigration managers and visa officers at foreign embassies — those who typically approve visas — may notify federal departments of cases in which refusing a visa could have “national interest considerations.”
Senior officials from these departments may then decide to write a national interest letter “sponsoring” the applicant and requesting that IRCC waive any security concerns.
https://globalnews.ca/news/6289240/canada-secret-program-grants-visas-to-war-criminals-terrorists-security-threats/ |
The rising rhetoric around refugees is fuelling many falsehoods about whether these new arrivals pose a threat The rising rhetoric around refugees is fuelling many falsehoods about whether these new arrivals pose a threat
According to the bulletin, the final decision on whether to issue this type of visa is made at the most senior levels of IRCC after each case is evaluated.
The bulletin also says public policy visas have the same physical appearance as ordinary visas and that recipients, such as Zahw, should not be notified when this type of visa is used.
The government would not comment on Zahw’s case specifically.
It did, however, say IRCC also has the power to grant temporary resident status to non-high-profile foreigners barred from entering Canada due to national security concerns, human rights violations and organized crime.
These cases are approved at the same decision-making level of IRCC as the public policy visas — although the process outlining how these decisions are made is publicly available.
Refugee claim triggers concern
Had Zahw and his wife visited their family in Brampton and returned to Egypt, immigration officials would not have revealed that his military past was a concern.
It wasn’t until the couple made refugee claims — alleging Egyptian intelligence agents mistreated them because Zahw opposed the 2013 coup — that Zahw’s rank as a brigadier-general was disclosed as a problem.
According to government lawyers, Zahw was allowed to visit Canada temporarily, but once he made a refugee claim — meaning he wanted to stay permanently — his special visa waiving national security concerns was no longer valid.
It was in support of this argument that lawyers for IRCC revealed the DND national interest letter and the internal bulletin describing the government’s public policy visa program, records from the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) show.
But Zahw disagreed with this argument, saying the government’s position made no sense.
The fact he was allowed to enter Canada after being assessed by the CBSA, Zahw argued, proved that he was not a threat and that any security concerns the government might have had were dealt with when he was issued his initial visitor visa.
Zahw, who worked as a telecommunications expert within the military, also argued that he was not dangerous and did not play a direct role in the 2013 coup.
According to the bulletin, the final decision on whether to issue this type of visa is made at the most senior levels of IRCC after each case is evaluated.
The bulletin also says public policy visas have the same physical appearance as ordinary visas and that recipients, such as Zahw, should not be notified when this type of visa is used.
READ MORE: Man nicknamed ‘Dr. No’ because he denied so many refugees, rehired to decide asylum claims
The government would not comment on Zahw’s case specifically.
It did, however, say IRCC also has the power to grant temporary resident status to non-high-profile foreigners barred from entering Canada due to national security concerns, human rights violations and organized crime.
These cases are approved at the same decision-making level of IRCC as the public policy visas — although the process outlining how these decisions are made is publicly available.
Refugee claim triggers concern
Had Zahw and his wife visited their family in Brampton and returned to Egypt, immigration officials would not have revealed that his military past was a concern.
It wasn’t until the couple made refugee claims — alleging Egyptian intelligence agents mistreated them because Zahw opposed the 2013 coup — that Zahw’s rank as a brigadier-general was disclosed as a problem.
According to government lawyers, Zahw was allowed to visit Canada temporarily, but once he made a refugee claim — meaning he wanted to stay permanently — his special visa waiving national security concerns was no longer valid.
It was in support of this argument that lawyers for IRCC revealed the DND national interest letter and the internal bulletin describing the government’s public policy visa program, records from the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB) show.
But Zahw disagreed with this argument, saying the government’s position made no sense.
The fact he was allowed to enter Canada after being assessed by the CBSA, Zahw argued, proved that he was not a threat and that any security concerns the government might have had were dealt with when he was issued his initial visitor visa.
Zahw, who worked as a telecommunications expert within the military, also argued that he was not dangerous and did not play a direct role in the 2013 coup.
Supporters of ousted president Mohamed Morsi are seen in
Rabaa Adaweya camp, where they called for his return after the
military coup that ousted him on July 3, 2013.
Mosa'ab Elshamy / Getty Images
But the IRB and Federal Court rejected these arguments, ruling that there is a distinction between coming to Canada temporarily versus permanently and that it made no difference whether or not Zahw was directly involved in the coup.
Under Canadian law, the government only has to prove there are “reasonable grounds to believe” someone is a member of an organization that engages in dangerous acts — such as subverting a government by force — in order to find them inadmissible on national security grounds.
Since Zahw’s position within the Egyptian army was never in dispute, the Federal Court rejected his application to proceed with an asylum claim.
Policy is an ‘insidious’ example of secrecy
While he does not have permission to speak about the case, Zahw’s lawyer, Hart Kaminker, told Global News he thinks the government’s secretive visa program is “troubling.”
This, he said, is because so many details about the policy are kept secret and because it creates a double-standard where “high-profile” people the CBSA thinks should be barred from entering Canada are let in while those who do not have the same power, money or influence are kept out.
Lorne Waldman, an immigration lawyer who specializes in human rights law and national security cases, has reviewed the operational bulletin obtained by Global News and says the policy is an “insidious” example of government secrecy.
He says it’s clear from the bulletin that the purpose of the program is to avoid embarrassing foreign governments — many of which are bad actors — by secretly approving visas for people who are or could be complicit in the most serious kinds of security risks, such as torture, war crimes, terrorism or human rights abuses.
But the IRB and Federal Court rejected these arguments, ruling that there is a distinction between coming to Canada temporarily versus permanently and that it made no difference whether or not Zahw was directly involved in the coup.
Under Canadian law, the government only has to prove there are “reasonable grounds to believe” someone is a member of an organization that engages in dangerous acts — such as subverting a government by force — in order to find them inadmissible on national security grounds.
Since Zahw’s position within the Egyptian army was never in dispute, the Federal Court rejected his application to proceed with an asylum claim.
Policy is an ‘insidious’ example of secrecy
While he does not have permission to speak about the case, Zahw’s lawyer, Hart Kaminker, told Global News he thinks the government’s secretive visa program is “troubling.”
This, he said, is because so many details about the policy are kept secret and because it creates a double-standard where “high-profile” people the CBSA thinks should be barred from entering Canada are let in while those who do not have the same power, money or influence are kept out.
READ MORE: Silenced by fear of deportation, why a woman who survived attempted murder is speaking out
Lorne Waldman, an immigration lawyer who specializes in human rights law and national security cases, has reviewed the operational bulletin obtained by Global News and says the policy is an “insidious” example of government secrecy.
He says it’s clear from the bulletin that the purpose of the program is to avoid embarrassing foreign governments — many of which are bad actors — by secretly approving visas for people who are or could be complicit in the most serious kinds of security risks, such as torture, war crimes, terrorism or human rights abuses.
Ex-minister under Hussein made refugee claim in Canada
The fact applicants don’t know they’re given a special visa makes the program even more troublesome, Waldman said. By staying silent about a person’s nefarious past, Canada is signalling to foreign governments and individuals that their actions are OK — even when they’re not.
“Where there’s a political interest to issue a visa, they’ll issue it,” he said.
And if, as the government insists, this program is necessary for maintaining Canada’s national interests, then the way these decisions are made and who makes them should be out in the open and subject to independent oversight, Waldman said.
“By doing it in a secretive, sort of clandestine manner, they’re hiding from the public the fact that they’re even engaging in this,” he said.
“This is extremely concerning, it’s extremely undemocratic… and Canadians have a right to know.”
The fact applicants don’t know they’re given a special visa makes the program even more troublesome, Waldman said. By staying silent about a person’s nefarious past, Canada is signalling to foreign governments and individuals that their actions are OK — even when they’re not.
“Where there’s a political interest to issue a visa, they’ll issue it,” he said.
And if, as the government insists, this program is necessary for maintaining Canada’s national interests, then the way these decisions are made and who makes them should be out in the open and subject to independent oversight, Waldman said.
“By doing it in a secretive, sort of clandestine manner, they’re hiding from the public the fact that they’re even engaging in this,” he said.
“This is extremely concerning, it’s extremely undemocratic… and Canadians have a right to know.”
Iran protest death toll now more than 300, Amnesty International says
BY AYA BATRAWY THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Posted December 16, 2019 6:28 am
Amnesty International said Monday that at least 304 people were killed in last month’s anti-government protests in Iran, a significantly higher number than what the rights group had reported previously.
The protests, which lasted about four days in several cities and towns in Iran in November, were sparked by a sharp rise in gasoline prices. During the violence and in the days that followed, Iranian authorities blocked access to the internet.
Amnesty said that Iranian security forces opened fire on unarmed protesters, killing scores. Iranian authorities subsequently arrested thousands of protesters as well as journalists, human rights defenders and students in a sweeping crackdown to prevent them from speaking up about the protests, the London-based watchdog said.
Tehran has yet to release any statistics about the scale of the unrest, though two weeks ago the government acknowledged that the security forces shot and killed protesters. Iranian state media referred to some of those shot and killed as “rioters.”
Amnesty said earlier this month that at least 208 were killed in the Nov. 15-18 protests. It did not provide an explanation for the new and higher death toll, reiterating that it had spoken to dozens of people inside the country and had compiled credible reports.
The majority of the deaths recorded by Amnesty were the result of gunshots to the head, heart and other vital organs. Among those killed, according to Amnesty, was a 15-year-old boy in the city of Shiraz who was shot as he passed by a protest on his way from school.
The rights group had noted how during the protests, Iran shut down internet access, blocking those inside the country from sharing videos and limiting knowledge about the full scale of the turmoil.
The protests were rooted in widespread economic discontent that has gripped the country since President Trump imposed crushing sanctions after withdrawing America from Tehran’s nuclear deal with world powers.
Iran’s national currency, the rial, has sharply plunged from the time of the 2015 nuclear accord while daily staples have risen in price.
Despite the hike in prices, gasoline in Iran remains among the cheapest in the world.
© 2019 The Canadian Press
SEE https://plawiuk.blogspot.com/search?q=IRAN
SEE https://plawiuk.blogspot.com/2006/09/us-war-on-capitalism-in-iran.html
BOEING NEWS UPDATED
Boeing suspends production of 737 Max model involved in fatal crashes
US air watchdog said last week it would not approve plane’s return to service before 2020
BOEING GOING GOING GONE AND THEY STILL ISSUE A DIVIDEND
Dominic Rushe and Reuters
@dominicru
Mon 16 Dec 2019
Boeing temporarily suspends 737 MAX production following FAA announcement
BY EMERALD BENSADOUN GLOBAL NEWS
Posted December 16, 2019 3:53 pm
Updated December 16, 2019 4:33 pm
WATCH: Production of Boeing 737 MAX planes temporarily suspended
Boeing has suspended production of its grounded 737 MAX aircraft, after the Federal Aviation Administration announced that it would not approve the jet’s return to service before 2020.
The temporary shutdown is a move that will affect Boeing’s global supply chain, and is likely to present further complications for airlines who have lost thousands of dollars on missed and cancelled flights.
The announcement came after a congressional hearing on Wednesday, Dec. 11 in which lawmakers urged the FAA to take a harder line with Boeing, whose 737 MAX planes have been grounded worldwide since March, following two fatal crashes in five months that killed 346 people.
The crashes happened within six months of each other. In March, Ethiopian Airlines flight 302 went down, killing 157 people — including 18 Canadians — while Lion Air flight 610 crashed in October, killing 189 people on board.
US air watchdog said last week it would not approve plane’s return to service before 2020
BOEING GOING GOING GONE AND THEY STILL ISSUE A DIVIDEND
Dominic Rushe and Reuters
@dominicru
Mon 16 Dec 2019
Boeing 737 Max aircraft parked on the tarmac at its factory in Renton,
Washington. Photograph: Lindsey Wasson/Reuters
Boeing is temporarily halting production of its grounded 737 Max after the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said last week it would not approve the plane’s return to service before 2020.
The decision came after the US planemaker’s board held a regular two-day meeting in Chicago, which started on Sunday.
“Safely returning the 737 Max to service is our top priority,” Boeing said in a statement. “We know that the process of approving the 737 Max’s return to service, and of determining appropriate training requirements, must be extraordinarily thorough and robust, to ensure that our regulators, customers, and the flying public have confidence in the 737 Max updates.”
The Max, which was Boeing’s bestselling plane, has been involved in two fatal crashes that claimed 346 lives. More than 700 Max jets are now grounded worldwide. It is the first time in 20 years that Boeing has halted 737 production and the move could have significant repercussions for the US economy.
Boeing is the US’s largest manufacturing exporter and a shutdown would impact suppliers across the country, hitting the country’s already troubled manufacturing sector. The suspension has already led to the cancellation of thousands of flights scheduled by airlines that were awaiting new planes or had bought ones that are now grounded.
The Seattle Times reported on Sunday that the board was considering a proposal from top management to temporarily shut down 737 production in Renton, Washington from January.
Boeing as yet has no timeframe for restarting production but plans to redeploy its 12,000-strong Renton workforce.
Boeing has said if it did not receive approval to begin deliveries before the end of the year it could be forced to further slow production or temporarily shut down the Max production line, a move that would have repercussions across its global supply chain.
On Thursday, Boeing abandoned its goal of winning approval this month to unground the 737 Max after its chief executive, Dennis Muilenburg, met FAA administrator Steve Dickson. Dickson said on Wednesday he would not clear the plane to fly before 2020 and disclosed the agency had an ongoing investigation into 737 production issues in Renton, Washington.
Dickson said there were nearly a dozen milestones that must be completed before the Max returns to service. Approval is not likely until at least February and could be delayed until March, US officials told Reuters last week.
Dickson told Muilenburg, according to an email sent to lawmakers by the FAA, that “Boeing’s focus should be on the quality and timeliness of data submittals for FAA review. He made clear that FAA’s certification requirements must be 100% complete before return to service.”
Boeing is temporarily halting production of its grounded 737 Max after the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said last week it would not approve the plane’s return to service before 2020.
The decision came after the US planemaker’s board held a regular two-day meeting in Chicago, which started on Sunday.
“Safely returning the 737 Max to service is our top priority,” Boeing said in a statement. “We know that the process of approving the 737 Max’s return to service, and of determining appropriate training requirements, must be extraordinarily thorough and robust, to ensure that our regulators, customers, and the flying public have confidence in the 737 Max updates.”
The Max, which was Boeing’s bestselling plane, has been involved in two fatal crashes that claimed 346 lives. More than 700 Max jets are now grounded worldwide. It is the first time in 20 years that Boeing has halted 737 production and the move could have significant repercussions for the US economy.
Boeing is the US’s largest manufacturing exporter and a shutdown would impact suppliers across the country, hitting the country’s already troubled manufacturing sector. The suspension has already led to the cancellation of thousands of flights scheduled by airlines that were awaiting new planes or had bought ones that are now grounded.
The Seattle Times reported on Sunday that the board was considering a proposal from top management to temporarily shut down 737 production in Renton, Washington from January.
Boeing as yet has no timeframe for restarting production but plans to redeploy its 12,000-strong Renton workforce.
Boeing has said if it did not receive approval to begin deliveries before the end of the year it could be forced to further slow production or temporarily shut down the Max production line, a move that would have repercussions across its global supply chain.
On Thursday, Boeing abandoned its goal of winning approval this month to unground the 737 Max after its chief executive, Dennis Muilenburg, met FAA administrator Steve Dickson. Dickson said on Wednesday he would not clear the plane to fly before 2020 and disclosed the agency had an ongoing investigation into 737 production issues in Renton, Washington.
Dickson said there were nearly a dozen milestones that must be completed before the Max returns to service. Approval is not likely until at least February and could be delayed until March, US officials told Reuters last week.
Dickson told Muilenburg, according to an email sent to lawmakers by the FAA, that “Boeing’s focus should be on the quality and timeliness of data submittals for FAA review. He made clear that FAA’s certification requirements must be 100% complete before return to service.”
Boeing temporarily suspends 737 MAX production following FAA announcement
BY EMERALD BENSADOUN GLOBAL NEWS
Posted December 16, 2019 3:53 pm
Updated December 16, 2019 4:33 pm
WATCH: Production of Boeing 737 MAX planes temporarily suspended
Boeing has suspended production of its grounded 737 MAX aircraft, after the Federal Aviation Administration announced that it would not approve the jet’s return to service before 2020.
The temporary shutdown is a move that will affect Boeing’s global supply chain, and is likely to present further complications for airlines who have lost thousands of dollars on missed and cancelled flights.
The announcement came after a congressional hearing on Wednesday, Dec. 11 in which lawmakers urged the FAA to take a harder line with Boeing, whose 737 MAX planes have been grounded worldwide since March, following two fatal crashes in five months that killed 346 people.
The crashes happened within six months of each other. In March, Ethiopian Airlines flight 302 went down, killing 157 people — including 18 Canadians — while Lion Air flight 610 crashed in October, killing 189 people on board.
A Boeing worker walks in view of a 737 MAX jet Dec. 16, 2019,
in Renton, Wash. Elaine Thompson / The Associated Press
Boeing said in an emailed statement Monday that safely returning the 737 MAX to service was its “top priority.”
“We know that the process of approving the 737 MAX’s return to service, and of determining appropriate training requirements, must be extraordinarily thorough and robust, to ensure that our regulators, customers, and the flying public have confidence in the 737 MAX updates,” it said, adding that it has around 400 airplanes in storage.
“We believe this decision is least disruptive to maintaining long-term production system and supply chain health.”
FAA Administrator Stephen Dickson said on Wednesday he would not clear the plane to fly before 2020, adding that the agency has an ongoing investigation into 737 production issues in Washington.
Dickson said there are nearly a dozen milestones that must be completed before the MAX returns to service, U.S. officials told Reuters, and approval is not likely until at least February.
“When the 737 MAX is returned to service, it will be because the safety issues have been addressed and pilots have received all of the training they need to safely operate the aircraft,” Dickson said Wednesday.
The FAA came under fire after their analysis revealed it had an official estimate that there could be 15 more fatal MAX crashes over the next few decades if Boeing didn’t fix a critical, automated flight-control system at least five months before the second deadly crash.
Earlier this month, the FAA also proposed a civil penalty of more than $3.9 million against Boeing for installing non-conforming components on approximately 133 aircraft, which Boeing subsequently presented as ready for airworthiness certification.
Boeing said in an emailed statement Monday that safely returning the 737 MAX to service was its “top priority.”
“We know that the process of approving the 737 MAX’s return to service, and of determining appropriate training requirements, must be extraordinarily thorough and robust, to ensure that our regulators, customers, and the flying public have confidence in the 737 MAX updates,” it said, adding that it has around 400 airplanes in storage.
“We believe this decision is least disruptive to maintaining long-term production system and supply chain health.”
FAA Administrator Stephen Dickson said on Wednesday he would not clear the plane to fly before 2020, adding that the agency has an ongoing investigation into 737 production issues in Washington.
READ MORE: After fatal crashes, Boeing says it must ‘re-earn’ public’s trust
Dickson said there are nearly a dozen milestones that must be completed before the MAX returns to service, U.S. officials told Reuters, and approval is not likely until at least February.
“When the 737 MAX is returned to service, it will be because the safety issues have been addressed and pilots have received all of the training they need to safely operate the aircraft,” Dickson said Wednesday.
The FAA came under fire after their analysis revealed it had an official estimate that there could be 15 more fatal MAX crashes over the next few decades if Boeing didn’t fix a critical, automated flight-control system at least five months before the second deadly crash.
Earlier this month, the FAA also proposed a civil penalty of more than $3.9 million against Boeing for installing non-conforming components on approximately 133 aircraft, which Boeing subsequently presented as ready for airworthiness certification.
Analyst says production halt of Boeing 737 MAX could have ‘substantial’ impact on U.S. economy Analyst says production halt of Boeing 737 MAX could have ‘substantial’ impact on U.S. economy
Boeing’s regular two-day board meeting began in Chicago on Sunday. At the time, the company said it could make an announcement on production plans as soon as late Monday.
In July, Boeing reported a $3-billion second-quarter loss after the prolonged grounding of its second plane. By Oct. 25, it released a statement that outlined steps taken to prevent future crashes.
After a lengthy investigation, federal officials found Boeing’s flight-control system — known as a Manoeuvring Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAs) — automatically pushed the noses of the doomed aircraft down in response to faulty sensor readings. In a statement, Boeing said it redesigned the way Angle of Attack (AoA) sensors work with its MCAs.
Going forward, MCAS will compare information from both AoA sensors before activating, adding a new layer of protection, Boeing said.
Boeing’s regular two-day board meeting began in Chicago on Sunday. At the time, the company said it could make an announcement on production plans as soon as late Monday.
In July, Boeing reported a $3-billion second-quarter loss after the prolonged grounding of its second plane. By Oct. 25, it released a statement that outlined steps taken to prevent future crashes.
After a lengthy investigation, federal officials found Boeing’s flight-control system — known as a Manoeuvring Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAs) — automatically pushed the noses of the doomed aircraft down in response to faulty sensor readings. In a statement, Boeing said it redesigned the way Angle of Attack (AoA) sensors work with its MCAs.
Going forward, MCAS will compare information from both AoA sensors before activating, adding a new layer of protection, Boeing said.
READ MORE: FAA predicted more Boeing 737 MAX planes would crash — but still allowed them to fly
In addition, the aircraft manufacturer said MCAS will now only turn on if both AoA sensors agree, will only activate once in response to erroneous AOA, and will include an override system.
Prior to the crashes, Canadian airlines Air Canada, WestJet and Sunwing Airlines flew 41 planes of the type that crashed in Ethiopia. Air Canada had 24, WestJet flew 13 and Sunwing had four.
In October, Air Canada announced that it would keep the Boeing 737 MAX off its flying schedule until Feb. 14, citing “regulatory uncertainty” that will affect thousands of passengers.
Will flights be affected?
In the “short to medium run,” David Gillen, director of the Centre for Transportation Studies at the University of British Columbia Sauder School of Business, said Canadian travellers won’t notice an increase in flight prices — but it could affect prices in the long run.
FAA chief admits agency made a mistake not taking immediate action
to prevent further Boeing 737 MAX crashes FAA chief admits agency
made a mistake not taking immediate action to prevent further
Boeing 737 MAX crashes
“An awful lot of airlines in the world had had planned on putting that particularly aircraft capacity into service,” he said.
“If that capacity is no longer there, it means that they’re going to have to scramble and get capacity from somewhere else.”
If Boeing were to invoke a permanent shutdown, he said another increase in prices would occur.
“Those fares have been increased in anticipation that the 737 capacity would come back online,” said Gillen.
Final report released on Boeing 737 MAX crash in the Java Sea Final
report released on Boeing 737 MAX crash in the Java Sea
“If that’s not going to happen over a fairly significant period of time, then we might see an increase in fares in the longer term.”
Helane Becker, an airline analyst with Cowen, said the temporary shutdown could make it difficult for airlines to grow if the 737 MAX isn’t re-certified through mid 2020.
Becker said it will take between two and four months for airlines to put the aircraft back in service once it has been re-certified, which means they could be out of commission through June 2020.
“One or two airlines may be able to do it within a month, but Air Canada has already stated they need at least four to six months. As a result, travellers will find fewer choices and higher fares when they go to book their trips,” she said.
© 2019 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.
to prevent further Boeing 737 MAX crashes FAA chief admits agency
made a mistake not taking immediate action to prevent further
Boeing 737 MAX crashes
Gillen, who also teaches transportation policy, said that after the initial grounding of the 737 MAX planes, prices soared between 15-20 per cent, where they’ve remained ever since.
“The loss of capacity has already being fully capitalized into the fare structure,” said Gillen.
He noted that a permanent shutdown was highly unlikely, but would be costly for airliners like Air Canada, whose MAX planes made up about 20 per cent of Air Canada’s narrow-body fleet and would typically carry about 11,000 passengers per day.
READ MORE: Will Boeing groundings make flight tickets more pricey? Experts say it’s possible
“An awful lot of airlines in the world had had planned on putting that particularly aircraft capacity into service,” he said.
“If that capacity is no longer there, it means that they’re going to have to scramble and get capacity from somewhere else.”
If Boeing were to invoke a permanent shutdown, he said another increase in prices would occur.
“Those fares have been increased in anticipation that the 737 capacity would come back online,” said Gillen.
Final report released on Boeing 737 MAX crash in the Java Sea Final
report released on Boeing 737 MAX crash in the Java Sea
“If that’s not going to happen over a fairly significant period of time, then we might see an increase in fares in the longer term.”
Helane Becker, an airline analyst with Cowen, said the temporary shutdown could make it difficult for airlines to grow if the 737 MAX isn’t re-certified through mid 2020.
Becker said it will take between two and four months for airlines to put the aircraft back in service once it has been re-certified, which means they could be out of commission through June 2020.
“One or two airlines may be able to do it within a month, but Air Canada has already stated they need at least four to six months. As a result, travellers will find fewer choices and higher fares when they go to book their trips,” she said.
© 2019 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.
$300,000 pilot jobs drying up in China with Boeing grounding
Carriers have largely stopped hiring foreign pilots for Boeing’s main narrow-bodied jet
Shanghai: Expatriate pilots flying Boeing Co.’s most popular plane for Chinese airlines used to be able to take their pick from dozens of jobs paying $300,000 plus perks thanks to a shortage of experienced aviators there.
The grounding of the 737 Max has changed that.
Chinese carriers have largely stopped hiring foreign pilots for Boeing’s main narrow-bodied jet, nine months after two crashes led to the grounding of the best-selling 737 Max, according to recruitment agencies. Airlines in China’s booming aviation market had been among the most enthusiastic buyers of the plane, accounting for 20% of a global fleet that now sits idle.
Chinese airlines still pay above-market wages but the lengthy grounding has hit a swath of roles paying multiple times the median salary of a commercial pilot in the US.
With no clear timeline for the Max’s reinstatement after two lethal crashes, demand for expat pilots of any 737 variant in China has slowed to a trickle. Only a handful of the country’s airlines are recruiting for such jobs now.
“We’ve seen airlines suspend recruitment of 737 pilots, period,” said Andre Allard, founder and president of AeroPersonnel Global Inc., a Montreal-based pilot-recruitment agency that has worked in China since 2007. “Many of these airlines had the Max on order. That evidently changed their plans.”
China’s growing middle class has put the country on track to be the world’s biggest aviation market in the coming next decade.
For many local airlines, short-haul workhorses like the 737 became the aircraft of choice in the travel frenzy. But China has long struggled to produce enough pilots on its own: By the end of 2016, Chinese carriers had more than 1,000 foreigners in their cockpits, double the number in 2010.
The decline in demand for overseas 737 pilots leaves many of the world’s best-paid flying jobs, which come with a suite of perks such as signing bonuses, education allowances and free flights, to foreign Airbus SE skippers who try their hand in China.
Triple Whammy
Boeing is under intense scrutiny following the two disasters that killed 346 people. In October last year, a Lion Air flight plunged into the sea shortly after taking off from Jakarta, and in March an Ethiopian Airlines jet crashed near Addis Ababa. It’s not just those Max tragedies weighing on the sector. China’s economy is slowing, and the country is locked in a trade war with the US that’s into its second year. As an American aerospace manufacturer, Chicago-based Boeing has found itself in the middle of the dispute.
China was the first major jurisdiction to ground the Max plane, which has been banned from flying since March as Boeing tries to fix a flight-control system implicated in both crashes. The US aviation regulator said in December it won’t complete the aircraft’s required approvals until 2020. Even then, the Max could take months to reach airlines: European low-cost carrier Ryanair Holdings Plc doesn’t expect deliveries before May.
Recruiter Wasinc International says the crisis at Boeing has spread to change the fortunes of aviators in China.
Only seven or eight of the 28 Chinese airlines on Wasinc’s books are actually hiring pilots, said the company’s president, Dave Ross.
“Most of them are overstaffed because of the grounding of the Max,” Ross said by phone from Las Vegas. Just one or two are interested in 737 pilots, he said.
A Boeing spokesman declined to comment on demand for foreign 737 pilots in China. Of the country’s big three carriers, China Eastern Airlines Co. declined to comment, while Air China Ltd. and China Southern Airlines Co. didn’t respond to requests for comment.
Low-cost carrier China United Airlines, a unit of China Eastern, is still in the market for pilots, offering $288,000 a year to 737 captains on three-year contracts, according to Wasinc’s website. But that’s the site’s first ad for 737 pilots in China since July. The package includes a monthly education allowance of $1,000 for children in Chinese schools.
The drought’s unlikely to end until the Max is cleared by regulators and Boeing can resume deliveries. Chinese buyers have received 76 of the jets so far, and are due to receive 181 more, according to data on Boeing’s website.
While there’s less immediate need for 737 pilots in China, appetite for Airbus captains is unabated. “The only airlines hiring without much change are A320 operators,” said Ross.
$311,000 After Tax
For example, Juneyao Airlines in Shanghai is offering $299,000 a year to A320 captainsaged between 30 and 53. The role demands an average of just 14 hours flying a week and includes 50 days of paid leave and an overseas employment allowance of $666 a month, according to Wasinc. The pay climbs to $311,000 “- after tax “- a year in the second term.
The Chinese airlines that are still hiring are getting more picky, said Tony Liu, a self-employed pilot agent based in Guangzhou, northwest of Hong Kong. In particular, they take a dim view of errors during flight assessments, he said.
“If you really want to work here, you have to prepare pretty good,” said Liu. “If you make some mistake in the simulator, they will be very strict.”
China has also sought to lean less on foreigners. The number of Chinese licensed commercial pilots was 61,492 at the end of 2018, according to the Civil Aviation Administration of China. That’s up 54% from 2014 levels, but it’s still not enough. According to Boeing, China will need 8,090 new aeroplanes over the next 20 years, the bulk of them single-aisle aircraft “- a category where Boeing’s 737 competes with Airbus’s A320 family of planes.
To fly them all, China will require another 124,000 pilots, Boeing says. That’s the equivalent of 119 new hires every week for two decades.
All told, it’s still possible for overseas pilots to head home with $1 million in the bank after five years of flying in China, said Allard at AeroPersonnel. It’s just that Airbus captains are more in favour now, he said.
“There is huge uncertainty about the Max,” Allard said. “It seems this thing is going on and on and on.”
Boeing board strips CEO of chairman title amid 737 MAX crisis
Boeing board strips CEO of chairman title amid 737 MAX crisis
Union warns Boris Johnson against civil service 'reform for reform's sake'
Shake-up by Dominic Cummings could damage ability to implement policy, says FDA
Rajeev Syal
Mon 16 Dec 2019
Shake-up by Dominic Cummings could damage ability to implement policy, says FDA
Rajeev Syal
Mon 16 Dec 2019
The Guardian
The union says Boris Johnson’s advisers should not get carried away with reforms to the Whitehall machine. Photograph: Andrew Aitchison/Corbis via Getty Images
Boris Johnson’s chief adviser should consult civil servants before embarking upon a wholesale programme of Whitehall reform, the head of the senior civil servants’ union has said.
Dave Penman, the head of the FDA union, said a major shake-up of the government machine drawn up by Dominic Cummings without his members’ input could be “reform for reform’s sake” and damage ministers’ ability to implement policy.
Government sources have confirmed reports that Mark Sedwill, the cabinet secretary, is expected to oversee a powerful new business department as part of a slew of expected departmental changes after the UK leaves the EU on 31 January.
The Foreign Office is expected to absorb the Department for International Development to align overseas aid with diplomatic goals. Officials say they could set up a new energy and climate change department.
Stephen Barclay’s Department for Exiting the European Union is expected to be closed down, with responsibility for negotiations over the UK’s future relationship with the EU being led by the Cabinet Office.
Penman said Johnson’s advisers should not get carried away with reforms, which can be expensive and damaging.
“Whilst those around the prime minister may relish in their reputations as revolutionaries sweeping away alleged civil service orthodoxy, reform for reform’s sake is an orthodoxy in itself.
“The civil service is far for perfect, but neither is it dysfunctional. Civil servants will be keen for reform, embracing the challenges the new government faces: that’s why they chose to work in government in the first place.
“Speaking to civil servants to understand what does work and what needs reform is often the biggest challenge for government. The prime minister must now rise to it,” he said.
Cummings, credited with devising the Conservatives’ election strategy that swept Johnson to victory, has been a long-term critic of Whitehall.
In a 2014 lecture, he complained that “almost no one is ever fired” in Whitehall and set out a “to-do list” he had drawn up in case “I ever manage to get control of No 10.”
Sources said Cummings had redrawn those plans during the six weeks of the general election campaign. The plans have been signed off by Johnson with the backing of the Cabinet Office minister, Michael Gove.
Another possible change includes splitting responsibility for the UK’s borders and immigration system off from the Home Office into a standalone department.
Penman, whose members include most departmental permanent secretaries, said that the government should ensure that any potential reforms do not get in the way of policy objectives.
“Ultimately, it is policy that will transform the country, not changing departmental infrastructure. Clarity over objectives and the policies that will deliver them should lead to conclusions on the structures needed to support them, not the other way around,” he said.
The leaders of 115 charities – including Oxfam GB, Unicef UK, WaterAid and World Vision UK – signed a statement amid speculation that Johnson was planning to merge DfID with the FCO.
The sector warned that such a move could lead to less aid reaching those who need it, less transparency about how funds are spent and less efficient use of resources.
Around 30% of the official development assistance budget is now spent outside DfID by other departments and cross-government funds, including the FCO and the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
The charities said a recent report by the Independent Commission for Aid Impact showed this had resulted in less UK aid getting to the world’s poorest people.
The statement reads: “Merging DfID with the Foreign Office would risk dismantling the UK’s leadership on international development and humanitarian aid.
“It suggests we are turning our backs on the world’s poorest people, as well as some of the greatest global challenges of our time: extreme poverty, climate change and conflict.”
Boris Johnson’s chief adviser should consult civil servants before embarking upon a wholesale programme of Whitehall reform, the head of the senior civil servants’ union has said.
Dave Penman, the head of the FDA union, said a major shake-up of the government machine drawn up by Dominic Cummings without his members’ input could be “reform for reform’s sake” and damage ministers’ ability to implement policy.
Government sources have confirmed reports that Mark Sedwill, the cabinet secretary, is expected to oversee a powerful new business department as part of a slew of expected departmental changes after the UK leaves the EU on 31 January.
The Foreign Office is expected to absorb the Department for International Development to align overseas aid with diplomatic goals. Officials say they could set up a new energy and climate change department.
Stephen Barclay’s Department for Exiting the European Union is expected to be closed down, with responsibility for negotiations over the UK’s future relationship with the EU being led by the Cabinet Office.
Penman said Johnson’s advisers should not get carried away with reforms, which can be expensive and damaging.
“Whilst those around the prime minister may relish in their reputations as revolutionaries sweeping away alleged civil service orthodoxy, reform for reform’s sake is an orthodoxy in itself.
Watch out, Whitehall. Dominic Cummings has some tough love in store for usThe civil servant
“The civil service is far for perfect, but neither is it dysfunctional. Civil servants will be keen for reform, embracing the challenges the new government faces: that’s why they chose to work in government in the first place.
“Speaking to civil servants to understand what does work and what needs reform is often the biggest challenge for government. The prime minister must now rise to it,” he said.
Cummings, credited with devising the Conservatives’ election strategy that swept Johnson to victory, has been a long-term critic of Whitehall.
In a 2014 lecture, he complained that “almost no one is ever fired” in Whitehall and set out a “to-do list” he had drawn up in case “I ever manage to get control of No 10.”
Sources said Cummings had redrawn those plans during the six weeks of the general election campaign. The plans have been signed off by Johnson with the backing of the Cabinet Office minister, Michael Gove.
Another possible change includes splitting responsibility for the UK’s borders and immigration system off from the Home Office into a standalone department.
Penman, whose members include most departmental permanent secretaries, said that the government should ensure that any potential reforms do not get in the way of policy objectives.
“Ultimately, it is policy that will transform the country, not changing departmental infrastructure. Clarity over objectives and the policies that will deliver them should lead to conclusions on the structures needed to support them, not the other way around,” he said.
The leaders of 115 charities – including Oxfam GB, Unicef UK, WaterAid and World Vision UK – signed a statement amid speculation that Johnson was planning to merge DfID with the FCO.
The sector warned that such a move could lead to less aid reaching those who need it, less transparency about how funds are spent and less efficient use of resources.
Around 30% of the official development assistance budget is now spent outside DfID by other departments and cross-government funds, including the FCO and the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
The charities said a recent report by the Independent Commission for Aid Impact showed this had resulted in less UK aid getting to the world’s poorest people.
The statement reads: “Merging DfID with the Foreign Office would risk dismantling the UK’s leadership on international development and humanitarian aid.
“It suggests we are turning our backs on the world’s poorest people, as well as some of the greatest global challenges of our time: extreme poverty, climate change and conflict.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)