Saturday, October 02, 2021

Wave of US labor unrest could see tens of thousands on strike within weeks


Michael Sainato
Fri, October 1, 2021

Tens of thousands of workers around the US could go on strike in the coming weeks in what would be the largest wave of labor unrest since a series of teacher strikes in 2018 and 2019, which won major victories and gave the American labor movement a significant boost.

The unrest spans a huge range of industries from healthcare to Hollywood and academia, and is largely focused on higher wages, fighting cuts and better working and safety conditions, especially in light of Covid-19.

Related: ‘A race to the bottom’: Google temps are fighting a two-tier labor system

It also plays out against a backdrop of an economy bouncing back from the torrid experience of widespread economic shutdowns during the coronavirus pandemic, but one that is still marked by profound inequality.

However, the pandemic is also seen as potentially providing a shot in the arm for US labor unions by increasing bargaining power amid increased union drives and labor shortages in some industries.

About 24,000 nurses and other healthcare workers at Kaiser Permanente in California represented by the United Nurses Associations of California/Union of Health Care Professionals will vote on a strike authorization from 1 to 10 October. The union took issue with Kaiser Permanente’s 1% wage increase for workers, cuts to wages for new staff, and benefit cuts in the company’s most recent offer.

“We have people burned out, complaining of mental health issues and PTSD. We’re in a situation as a union where we’re concerned about the future of nursing, [and] how we recruit and retain nurses and other healthcare professionals,” said Denise Duncan, president of UNAC/UHCP and a registered nurse.

About 700 building engineers at Kaiser Permanente in the San Francisco area are already on strike.

An additional 3,400 health workers in Oregon and 7,400 health workers with USW at Kaiser Permanente also announced strike authorization votes. Other unions representing thousands of workers at the company with expiring union contracts are considering strike authorization votes.

In an emailed statement, Kaiser Permanente’s senior vice-president of human resources, Arlene Peasnall, said: “Kaiser Permanente’s Labor Management Partnership was created 24 years ago, and has a great track record of serving as the framework through which we can solve sometimes very difficult problems. Instead of abandoning it, in the spirit of the partnership we ask union leaders to continue to work constructively toward an agreement, rather than call on nurses and other employees to walk away from patients who need them during this pandemic.”


A nurse from the Kaiser Permanente Woodland Hills medical center in California holds an electric candle during a candlelight vigil in memory of those lost during the pandemic. 
Photograph: Valérie Macon/AFP/Getty Images

After four months of negotiations with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP), the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees (IATSE)announced a strike authorization vote for 60,000 workers across the film and television industry in the US. If the union moves forward with the strike, it would be the first among Hollywood production workers since the second world war.

Hollywood workers have reported long workdays and unsafe schedules that have worsened during the pandemic. Pay rates for many workers have remained low, at just above the minimum wage in the Los Angeles area, while streaming services and shorter television series have also depressed wages.

“They wouldn’t have much to film if we weren’t here building everything for them,” said Joe Martinez, a IATSE Local 44 member and special effects technician. “They need to start looking at it from a perspective of what would happen if we weren’t there. And then it changes the whole dynamics, because there’s no way they would ever have a central product if we weren’t there.”

The voting starts 1 October, with 75% of each local union’s delegates required to vote in favor of the strike authorization. The AMPTP argued IATSE left a “generous, comprehensive package” on the bargaining table for a strike authorization vote.

Several other large groups of workers have voted to authorize strikes around the US while continuing new union contract negotiations, such as 2,000 Frontier Communications workers in California, transit workers in Beaumont, Texas, and Akron, Ohio, about 450 public works employees in Minneapolis, Minnesota, dining workers at Northwestern University, and hundreds of group home workers in Connecticut.

Graduate workers at Harvard and Columbia University are currently holding strike authorization votes and Illinois State University graduate workers have authorized the bargaining team to call for a strike vote.

About 1,100 coalminers in Alabama have been on strike for the past six months and 2,000 carpenters in Washington have been on strike since 16 September.

On 12 September, 10,100 John Deere production and warehouse workers in Iowa, Illinois and Kansas, represented by nine locals with the United Auto Workers voted 99% in favor of a strike authorization if a new six-year union contract isn’t attained through negotiations with the company.

After the strike vote, some union members held a protest outside John Deere headquarters in Moline, Illinois, over the company’s first contract offer.


John Deere’s Harvester Works facility in East Moline, Illinois. 
Workers protested against the company’s first contract offer.
 Photograph: Daniel Acker/Reuters

According to workers at the strike authorization meetings, John Deere’s first contract offer included increases in healthcare costs, including premiums and deductibles, the end of a no plant closure commitment in the union contract agreement, and reducing eligibility for overtime after eight hours a day to only after exceeding 40 hours in a week. The current union contract expires on 1 October.

“The initial offer is really a slap in the face,” said Chris Larsen, a member of UAW Local 74 in Ottumwa, Iowa, who has worked at John Deere for 19 years. “There are a lot of dissatisfied people.”

John Deere has reported record profits in 2021, breaking their annual profit record in the first nine months of this year with new earnings records set each quarter in 2021 so far. The company reported a net income of $4.7bn on 2 August, compared with their previous record profit year in 2013 where the annual net income was reported at $3.5bn.

A spokesperson for John Deere declined to comment on the initial offer.

Elsewhere 2,500 nurses and other hospital staff represented by the Communications Workers of America are fighting for a new union contract with Catholic Health at three hospitals in the Buffalo, New York, area. At Catholic Health’s Mercy hospital 2,000 workers voted 97% in favor of authorizing a strike to start on 1 October, when their current contract expires.

Tina Knop, a nurse at Mercy hospital, argued unsafe staffing ratios, lack of support staff and supply shortages have worsened working conditions through the pandemic, and made it more difficult to adequately care for patients.

“What we’re fighting for is to have better staffing and Catholic Health to come forward and work harder to actually staff their facilities,” said Knop. “They’re not providing us with support, emotionally or physically, and all they want to do is cut our pay, take away the pension targets, and charge more for our health insurance.”

Cheryl Darling, an immediate treatment assistant at Mercy hospital, recently tested positive for Covid-19 though she is vaccinated, but only found out from a rapid test she took before visiting her mother at a local nursing home. She described chaotic working conditions at the hospital due to staffing shortages from housekeepers to nurses, leaving workers struggling to keep up with the workloads.

“I’m afraid to go into work, because I don’t know what my day is going to be like,” said Darling. “I go to bed the night before work and I’m a bundle of nerves, because I don’t know where they’re going to put me or what my work conditions are going to be.”

In a statement, Catholic Health’s president, Eddie Bratko, said: “I want to assure our community that our top priority is the welfare and safety of our patients, and our hospital will remain open and operational during a strike to continue providing safe, high quality care.”

SOCIALISM IS THE ONLY FIX



 





Covid is killing rural Americans at twice the rate of urbanites

REUTERS/BRYAN WOOLSTON
Covid is killing rural Americans at twice the rate of urbanites.
By Lauren Weber & Kaiser Health News
Published September 30, 2021

Rural Americans are dying of Covid at more than twice the rate of their urban counterparts—a divide that health experts say is likely to widen as access to medical care shrinks for a population that tends to be older, sicker, heavier, poorer, and less vaccinated.

While the initial surge of Covid-19 deaths skipped over much of rural America, where roughly 15% of Americans live, nonmetropolitan mortality rates quickly started to outpace those of metropolitan areas as the virus spread nationwide before vaccinations became available, according to data from the Rural Policy Research Institute.

Since the pandemic began, about 1 in 434 rural Americans have died of Covid, compared with roughly 1 in 513 urban Americans, the institute’s data shows. And though vaccines have reduced overall Covid death rates since the winter peak, rural mortality rates are now more than double urban rates—and accelerating quickly.

In rural northeastern Texas, Titus Regional Medical Center CEO Terry Scoggin is grappling with a 39% vaccination rate in his community. Eleven patients died of Covid in the first half of September at his hospital in Mount Pleasant, population 16,000. Typically, three or four non-hospice patients die there in a whole month.

“We don’t see death like that,” Scoggin said. “You usually don’t see your friends and neighbors die.”

Part of the problem is that Covid incidence rates in September were roughly 54% higher in rural areas than elsewhere, said Fred Ullrich, a University of Iowa College of Public Health research analyst who co-authored the institute’s report. He said the analysis compared the rates of nonmetropolitan, or rural, areas and metropolitan, or urban, areas. In 39 states, he added, rural counties had higher rates of Covid than their urban counterparts.

“There is a national disconnect between perception and reality when it comes to Covid in rural America,” said Alan Morgan, head of the National Rural Health Association. “We’ve turned many rural communities into kill boxes. And there’s no movement towards addressing what we’re seeing in many of these communities, either among the public or among governing officials.”

Still, the high incidence of cases and low vaccination rates don’t fully capture why mortality rates are so much higher in rural areas than elsewhere. Academics and officials alike describe rural Americans’ greater rates of poor health and their limited options for medical care as a deadly combination. The pressures of the pandemic have compounded the problem by deepening staffing shortages at hospitals, creating a cycle of worsening access to care.

It’s the latest example of the deadly coronavirus wreaking more havoc in some communities than others. Covid has also killed Native American, Black, and Hispanic people at disproportionately high rates.

Vaccinations are the most effective way to prevent Covid infections from turning deadly. Roughly 41% of rural America was vaccinated as of Sept. 23, compared with about 53% of urban America, according to an analysis by The Daily Yonder, a newsroom covering rural America. Limited supplies and low access made shots hard to get in the far-flung regions at first, but officials and academics now blame vaccine hesitancy, misinformation, and politics for the low vaccination rates.

In hard-hit southwestern Missouri, for example, 26% of Newton County’s residents were fully vaccinated as of Sept. 27. The health department has held raffles and vaccine clinics, advertised in the local newspaper, and even driven the vaccine to those lacking transportation in remote areas, according to department administrator Larry Bergner. But he said interest in the shots typically increases only after someone dies or gets seriously ill within a hesitant person’s social circle.


Additionally, the overload of Covid patients in hospitals has undermined a basic tenet of rural healthcare infrastructure: the capability to transfer patients out of rural hospitals to higher levels of specialty care at regional or urban health centers.

“We literally have email Listservs of rural chief nursing officers or rural CEOs sending up an SOS to the group, saying, ‘We’ve called 60 or 70 hospitals and can’t get this heart attack or stroke patient or surgical patient out and they’re going to get septic and die if it goes on much longer,’” said John Henderson, president and CEO of the Texas Organization of Rural & Community Hospitals.

Morgan said he can’t count how many people have talked to him about the transfer problem.

“It’s crazy, just crazy. It’s unacceptable,” Morgan said. “From what I’m seeing, that mortality gap is accelerating.”

Access to medical care has long bedeviled swaths of rural America—since 2005, 181 rural hospitals have closed. A 2020 Kaiser Health News analysis found that more than half of US counties, many of them largely rural, don’t have a hospital with intensive care unit beds.

Pre-pandemic, rural Americans had 20% higher overall death rates than those who live in urban areas, due to their lower rates of insurance, higher rates of poverty, and more limited access to healthcare, according to 2019 data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Health Statistics.

In southeastern Missouri’s Ripley County, the local hospital closed in 2018. As of Sept. 27, only 24% of residents were fully vaccinated against Covid. Due to a recent crush of cases, Covid patients are getting sent home from emergency rooms in surrounding counties if they’re not “severely bad,” health department director Tammy Cosgrove said.

The nursing shortage hitting the country is particularly dire in rural areas, which have less money than large hospitals to pay the exorbitant fees travel nursing agencies are demanding. And as nursing temp agencies offer hospital staffers more cash to join their teams, many rural nurses are jumping ship. One of Scoggin’s nurses told him she had to take a travel job—she could pay off all her debt in three months with that kind of money.

And then there’s the burnout of working over a year and a half through the pandemic. Audrey Snyder, the immediate past president of the Rural Nurse Organization, said she’s lost count of how many nurses have told her they’re quitting. Those resignations feed into a relentless cycle: As travel nurse companies attract more nurses, the nurses left behind shouldering their work become more burned out—and eventually quit. While this is true at hospitals of all types, the effects in hard-to-staff rural hospitals can be especially dire.

Rural health officials fear the staffing shortages could be exacerbated by healthcare vaccination mandates promised by President Joe Biden, which they say could cause a wave of resignations the hospitals cannot afford. About half of Scoggin’s staff, for example, is unvaccinated.

Snyder warned that nursing shortages and their high associated costs will become unsustainable for rural hospitals operating on razor-thin margins. She predicted a new wave of rural hospital closures will further drive up the dire mortality numbers.

Staffing shortages already limit how many beds hospitals can use, Scoggin said. He estimated most hospitals in Texas, including his own, are operating at roughly two-thirds of their bed capacity. His emergency room is so swamped, he’s had to send a few patients home to be monitored daily by an ambulance team.

This article is republished from Kaiser Health News under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

A hint the Afghanistan war isn't really over

Bonnie Kristian, Deputy editor
THE WEEK
Fri, October 1, 2021

Afghanistan. Illustrated | iStock, Library of Congress

The United States will continue "over the horizon" strikes against suspected terrorists in Afghanistan, the Pentagon said Thursday, a month after the U.S. war in Afghanistan theoretically came to a close. The statement raises an important question: Just how completely did the war end?

When President Biden first announced his withdrawal timeline in May, his administration sent decidedly mixed messages. Biden himself had long favored keeping a residual American force on the ground indefinitely. Reports at the time indicated U.S. airstrikes would continue, a sizable presence of "clandestine Special Operations forces, Pentagon contractors, and covert intelligence operatives" would remain, and many recently exited U.S. forces would set up shop in nearby nations and waters so they could continue training Afghan allies and conducting airstrikes.

Clearly some of that plan has changed following the chaotic U.S. withdrawal and Taliban takeover of Kabul. In recent weeks, Biden has rejected the residual force idea. Hopefully, we're no longer training the military of an Afghan government that no longer exists. But the status of clandestine troops, contractors, and spies is more uncertain. In early September, the Biden administration said only 100 to 200 Americans remained in Afghanistan. But some U.S. contractors aren't American, and if the Special Ops forces and spies were still present, they might not be included in that count. Admitting covert operatives are still in the country kind of ruins the whole "covert" thing.

Then there are these "over the horizon" strikes, which Pentagon Press Secretary John Kirby clarified aren't exclusively drone hits, like the recent U.S. strike that killed seven children and no terrorists. "It doesn't even always have to mean aviation," Kirby said. "'Over the horizon,' as [Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin] defined it, means that the strike, assets, and the target analysis comes from outside the country in which the operation occurs."

In other words, plans to restation U.S. forces just outside Afghan borders may be significantly unchanged. (Strangely, those forces may set up shop on Russian military bases.) Some of these strikes — if they're not airstrikes — may even have U.S. boots once again on Afghan ground. And the strikes will fall under the aegis of the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF). That's the very authorization that launched the war in Afghanistan, the war that's supposed to be done.
NUCLEAR IS GREEN, IT GLOWS IN THE DARK
France could decide on new EPR reactors before Flamanville plant starts -minister


The questions to the government session at the National Assembly in Paris

Fri, October 1, 2021

PARIS (Reuters) - France could decide to build six new nuclear EPR reactors before EDF's EPR nuclear power plant in Flamanville, northwestern France, is fully operational, Industry Minister Agnes Pannier-Runacher said on Friday, as the country bets on renewables and nuclear power for its energy sovereignty.

The French government has said until now it would not launch new EPR reactor projects until the Flamanville EPR station, which suffered several delays, is completed.

"Once the EPR at Flamanville is completed, we have to make that decision (on new EPR reactors), maybe we will make it a little bit earlier when we are sure the Flamanville EPR is on the right track", Pannier-Runacher told BFM television.

The minister did not say when the plant at Flamanville will start running.

State-run EDF's CEO Jean-Bernard Levy reaffirmed in April that the new EPR reactor at Flamanville was expected to come on line at the end of 2022 but said EDF could not afford further problems if that timetable was to be met.

Work on Flamanville began in 2007, its expected cost has tripled and work is running a decade behind schedule after delays caused by problems including weak spots found in its reactor vessel head.

(Reporting by Gwenaelle Barzic, Benjamin Mallet and Matthieu Protard, Editing by Louise Heavens)
The Senate confirmed Rohit Chopra to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

The student-loan industry could face a crackdown as yet another Elizabeth Warren ally takes a top oversight job for Biden




Ayelet Sheffey
Thu, September 30, 2021, 2:54 PM·3 min read

The Senate confirmed Rohit Chopra to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Chopra helped create the bureau with Elizabeth Warren and cracked down on the student-loan industry.

He joins other Warren allies in Biden's ranks fighting for student-loan borrowers.


Yet another ally of Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren - one of the biggest advocates for student-loan borrowers in Congress - joined President Joe Biden's ranks on Thursday.


Before leaving for recess, the Senate confirmed Rohit Chopra to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the government's consumer protection and oversight agency. Chopra previously served in the CFPB as its first student-loan ombudsman, and he was with Warren when she created the agency in 2011 to ensure people across the country are being financially protected. Now, he joins CFPB as student-loan companies face more stringent regulations leading up to February's payment restart after more than a year's pause. In recent weeks, three servicers have said they'll be shutting down, leaving 16 million borrowers to transition to new companies.


After Chopra's nomination was announced in January, Warren wrote on Twitter that she worked closely with him "to set up the CFPB and fight for America's children."

"It's terrific that President-elect Biden picked Rohit to run the @CFPB," Warren wrote. "He's been a fearless champion for consumers at the FTC (Federal Trade Commission) and will be a fearless champion leading the consumer agency."

Chopra left the CFPB in 2015 and was sworn in as a Federal Trade Commissioner in 2018, during which he worked to protect consumers from unfair business practices. But his work at the agency suggests the student-loan industry will be facing much stricter oversight from here on out.

As the agency's first student-loan watchdog, he primarily focused on unearthing problems with student-loan companies and ensuring the millions of borrowers across the country were not being mistreated. Chopra helped President Barack Obama establish the Student Aid Bill of Rights, which improves how the companies interact with borrowers, and in 2013, he led the bureau in discovering that more than 7 million borrowers were in default on their debt.

Since then, the CFPB has revealed a number of findings of student-loan abuses, and in some cases, has taken legal action against the companies. For example, the agency sued Navient, one of the biggest student-loan servicing companies in the US, in 2017 for "illegally failing borrowers at every stage of repayment," including causing borrowers to take on more debt than they could pay off.

Now that Chopra is confirmed to lead the agency, he will likely continue enforcing fair student lending. During his March confirmation hearing, Chopra said he will focus on protecting Americans with debt and he acknowledged the challenges that will come in February when the student-loan payment pause lifts.

"We are at a critical moment when so many borrowers are going to have to restart their payments," Chopra said during the hearing. He added that he will ensure the restart is "happening lawfully so we can avoid an avalanche of defaults when any moratorium might end."

Three student-loan companies have already announced their plans to shut down their services at the end of this year, bringing additional administrative hurdles to the already substantial burden the Education Department has with resuming payment collections for 43 million borrowers.

And Richard Cordray, the head of the Federal Student Aid office and another Warren allysuggested in a conference earlier this month that those shutdowns are occurring because those companies do not want to be held to higher accountability standards under Biden.

Insider reported in July on the student-loan advocates that have joined Biden's ranks, and with Chopra now leading the government's consumer watchdog agency, more reforms to the student-loan industry are likely to come.

Fourth student loan servicer quits, Warren decries 'broken system'

Aarthi Swaminathan
·Reporter
Thu, September 30, 2021,

Major student loan servicer Navient (NAVI) is quitting the federal servicing business, the company announced Tuesday, handing off its 5.5 million borrowers holding about $280 billion in federal student loans to Maximus, another servicer.

Advocates and progressive lawmakers led by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) heralded the move, in light of Navient's troubled relationship with the federal government's consumer protection bodies.

But the departure adds another challenge when the Education Department (ED) looks to end the student loan payment pause in January — especially after four other servicers quit in the past year.

"Even under the best of circumstances, this is a monumental task," Persis Yu, director of the National Consumer Law Center’s Student Loan Borrower Assistance Project, told Yahoo Finance. "It's a process that needs to be managed very slowly and deliberately, [and] I have a lot of concerns about whether or not that can actually be done in the timelines that we have."


Signage is seen on the offices of Navient in Wilmington, 
Delaware, U.S., June 9, 2021. 
REUTERS/Andrew Kelly

'Need to have hand-holding to this entire process'

With Navient's announcement, roughly 16.3 million student loan borrowers will be getting a new loan servicer in 2022.

The Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency — which services around 8.5 million student loan borrowers — and Granite State — which services around 1.3 million borrowers — both called it quits in July. Utah Higher Education Assistance Authority, which pulled out in October 2020, serviced around 1 million student loan borrowers.

The departures come as the majority of the 43 million student loan borrowers across the U.S must start paying their loans again. The payments have been paused, without interest, since March 13, 2020, with the Biden administration recently extending the pause through January 31, 2022.

Advocates expressed deep concern about the transfer process, given the short timeline between October and February 2022. The U.S. government, which owns trillions of dollars in student loan debt, has already expressed that ending the payment pause needs to be carefully managed.

Navient’s departure aside, these transitions are going to be tricky, especially given uncertainty around whether the servicers "have the staff capacity to handle the influx of borrowers who are going to be confused and are going to need to have hand-holding to this entire process,” Yu said.

Richard Cordray, chief operating officer of Federal Student Aid, which handles the trillion-dollar student loan portfolio, said in a statement that his agency is still reviewing documents and information from both Navient and Maximus "to ensure that the proposal meets all legal requirements and properly protects borrowers and taxpayers."

Richard Nicholls, 22, a graduate in engineering from The City College of New York is on his phone after his commencement ceremony in Manhattan on May 31, 2019. REUTERS/Gabriela Bhaskar


'Behind the scenes company'


Maximus for its part has expressed its intention to provide high-quality service for student loan borrowers with the payment pause ending. Maximus spokesperson Eileen Cassidy Rivera said in a statement to Yahoo Finance that the company was "committed to ensuring a seamless transition for student loan borrowers" and to help borrowers manage the re-starting of repayment come 2022.

But Yu and other advocates also expressed concern that Maximus, despite being a government contractor over the years, had largely been out of the public eye and doesn’t provide the same services that Navient does.

Maximus has until now run debt collection and management for ED, according to a blog post by the Student Borrower Protection Center (SBPC). And not many borrowers are aware of the company's existence, said Yu.

"Maximus is a company that has not been subject to much public scrutiny. It is a servicer, but it doesn't do the functions that Navient, [the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency], and the other ones do," Yu explained. "So we don't have a track record of how it helps borrowers navigate income-based repayment."

And being a very "behind the scenes company," she added, "it's concerning that Navient can just choose its replacement and choose someone who is not in the public eye, and who has no track record."


WASHINGTON, DC, UNITED STATES - 2019/07/23: U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) speaks at a press conference during the introduction of a bill to cancel students loan debt held at the Capitol in Washington, DC. 
(Photo by Michael Brochstein/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)More


Navient's problems

Navient has long been in the crosshairs of advocates and progressive lawmakers who believed the company was responsible for shoddy servicing, such as steering student loan borrowers into high-cost repayment plans or for deceptive practices from New Jersey to Washington.

Its departure was welcomed.

“Navient has spent decades misleading, cheating, and abusing student borrowers. The Federal student loan program will be far better off without them," Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) said in a statement.

"Ultimately, the student loan system is broken,” she continued. “The only way to guarantee that borrowers do not face the same predatory behavior from Navient’s replacement is to cancel student debt, so that no borrower’s future is held hostage by corporations profiting off their financial distress.”



Aarthi is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. She can be reached at aarthi@yahoofinance.com. Follow her on Twitter @aarthiswami.



GLOBALIZATION IS GLOBAL FORDISM
Spain to negotiate with China's Great Wall Motor to take over Nissan plant


FILE PHOTO: The logo of Nissan is seen through a fence at Nissan factory at Zona Franca during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in Barcelona

Joan Faus
Fri, October 1, 2021,

BARCELONA (Reuters) -Spanish authorities and Nissan will enter talks with China's Great Wall Motor over a possible takeover of the Japanese carmaker's plant in Barcelona, which is due to shut in December, they said on Friday.

National and regional authorities, together with Nissan, also picked Spanish electric motorcycle manufacturer Silence and local engineering firm QEV Technologies - which leads an electric vehicle production hub integrated by Swedish manufacturers Inzile and Volta - to negotiate the fate of two smaller plants.

Nissan's three Barcelona plants employ around 3,000 people directly and 20,000 indirectly.

But only 1,600 direct jobs are at stake since the rest of the workers will benefit from early retirement and other measures, a CGT union source told Reuters.

The source said Great Wall was interested in the larger plant and would study whether it might have use for the other two, while Silence and QEV Technologies are only interested in the smaller factories.

"We are convinced we will be able to find solutions that are beneficial to everyone," Nissan's industrial head in Spain, Frank Torres, said in a statement.

In a severe blow to Spain, Europe's second-largest car producer, Nissan announced last year it would shut its three factories as part of a global restructuring.

It initially said the plants would close by December 2020 but later pushed the date back a year, as it started looking for an alternative industrial project with authorities.

Great Wall Motor has not made public its plan for the factories, but a source with knowledge of the talks said it could keep around 1,300 jobs.

A project presented by Belgian carmaker Punch for Nissan's plants has been left out of the upcoming negotiations, although officials said no option was fully excluded.

(Reporting by Joan Faus and Inti Landauro, editing by Andrei Khalip and Louise Heavens)



As renewable energy surges, North Texans want underserved communities to have access


Haley Samsel
Fri, October 1, 2021

Rosa Orenstein’s passion for renewable energy started with a horrific event: the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001. In the aftermath, Orenstein thought about how fossil fuel dependency was driving U.S. involvement in the Middle East, where Americans wanted to protect their oil interests.

“I started thinking about: How do we get off this fossil fuel dependency?” Orenstein, a Dallas attorney, said. “Then I started looking around until I came to the conclusion that solar was the ultimate answer because it can be distributed to the smallest unit and to the largest unit.”

A lot has changed since Orenstein began her journey to become chair of the North Texas Renewable Energy Group, which formed in early 2001.


Solar energy is growing more popular by the year, with 46% of U.S. homeowners stating they have given serious thought to adding panels at their home, according to a 2019 Pew Research Center survey. The Labor Department projects wind turbine technicians will have one of the fastest growth rates of all occupations between 2019 and 2029, with solar panel installers right behind.

Orenstein, who has been involved with NTREG for 18 years, knows the organization must continue its core mission of helping interested residents explore their renewable options.

But she’s also ready to lead the group toward its next goal: educating underrepresented communities about clean energy, and ensuring people of color and women benefit from the surge of renewable jobs expected in Texas.

“We have to expand and include the new technologies that are coming in, and include low-income and moderate-income communities, people of color and underserved communities so that they, too, can be part of this energy revolution,” Orenstein said.

The COVID-19 pandemic has made achieving those milestones more challenging, Orenstein said. But the organization has made every effort to adapt, including taking its annual DFW Solar Tour to a virtual format.

The event, which showcases homes and businesses using renewable energy and energy conservation technology in unique ways, is set for Saturday, Oct. 2 from 9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.

While Zoom presentations can’t replicate traveling throughout North Texas to visit solar installations, attendees will still have an interactive experience through Q&A sessions with presenters from Dallas College, the city of Cedar Hill and homeowners across the region, according to Mark Witte, NTREG’s event chair.

“We’re excited about this year because the people that are on the solar tour have done a very good job with their solar installations that produce a lot of energy, and they save a lot of money,” Witte said. “It’s good for other people to hear that message from the people that have done it and can talk to all the difficulties and whatnot associated with getting it done.”

For those less familiar with the specifics of energy efficiency or panel installation, organizers offer Solar 101 sessions to answer questions about purchasing, financing and conserving energy on their properties.

NTREG also helps members address obstacles to adopting solar technology, including opposition from homeowners associations that restrict where panels can be installed — or if they can be installed at all. Changing attitudes toward renewables have begun to reach HOAs and the attorneys who represent them, Orenstein said.

“There is a recognition that sooner or later, it’ll just be a question of where and how the installations will be installed and not whether they should be installed in any neighborhood,” Orenstein said. “I have not seen people stopping because of opposition to solar. I’ve seen people working to resolve the challenge that is in front of them, so they can get their energy system installed.”

Orenstein wants the growing opportunities to save money on energy through solar and conservation to reach communities that need it most. Before the pandemic, NTREG hosted mobile learning events where leaders would travel to community centers, including the Martin Luther King center in south Dallas, to connect residents with information and resources about solar power.

“I know that having everything up online is great, and we’re getting a lot of participation not only locally but even from overseas,” Orenstein said. “I do regret that the coronavirus has not made it possible for us to reach into other communities that we want to make sure participate in this.”




While COVID-19 has eliminated those events for the time being, NTREG is taking other steps to bring underrepresented groups into the fold.

As part of a partnership with the Texas Solar Energy Society, the organization is launching a diversity internship program that will pay students at least $15 per hour for 10 weeks of part-time work at a renewable energy company.

College students from all backgrounds are encouraged to apply, and the organization is particularly focused on recruiting from UT Arlington, Tarrant County College, Texas A&M University-Commerce and Dallas College, according to GreenSourceDFW. Orenstein is hoping to fill six positions each for the fall and spring semesters, and provide a local mentor to each student.

Those plans reflect NTREG’s growing mission, and its desire to take its educational events to the next level, Orenstein said. In the next decade of the organization’s advocacy, she and Witte hope to see the group grow participation and provide a location for visitors to witness how these energy systems work.

As technology improves and solar energy becomes more affordable to the general public, North Texas will have an important role to play, Orenstein said.

“I think it’s a question of how we handle the transition as best as possible recognizing that we live in this region that is one of the largest producers of oil and natural gas in the world,” Orenstein said. “But because of that, Texas is also one of the answers that can move the needle in clean energy once this transition starts.”
'Government Bans Words' Seems Like a Free Speech Issue

Jack Holmes
Thu, September 30, 2021


Photo credit: Andy Manis - Getty Images

For years, we had to hear about the grave threat to free speech—and a free society itself—posed by students on college campuses who had become Shock Troops in the Woke Wars. They were using the threat of pitchfork-mob cancellation to terrify conservative professors, fellow students, and visiting speakers away from speaking hard truths we all need to hear, like whatever kernels of wisdom Milo Yiannopoulos—remember that guy?—or Ben Shapiro had to offer the students of Berkeley. Never mind that these events were often stunts, ruses to create opportunities for meta-commentary about The Intolerant Left rather than an actual attempt at a dialogue on the purported issue at hand, and that these renegade free thinkers can, like anyone else, be found wielding social opprobrium to crush speech they do not like. Other people who used their speech to tell you your speech sucks became part of the authoritarian vanguard, hell-bent on SILENCING! you and forcing you to put your preferred pronouns in your email signature. This was, in its totality, a matter of grave national concern.

Anyway, now state governments are trying to ban words. We can expect to see all these same free-speech warriors snap to attention, surely. I'm not a constitutional law professor, but Government Bans Words strikes me as a First Amendment issue. The Wisconsin assembly is the latest state legislature to tackle the existential threat posed by Critical Race Theory, a phrase that has come to mean, for many people, "things that make me uncomfy," and which is so dangerous that any speech related to it must be policed by the government. The Wisconsin State Journal has the details:

In testimony before an Assembly committee last month, Wichgers said the bill would ban the teaching of concepts including “Social Emotional Learning,” “Diversity, Equity and Inclusion,” culturally responsive teaching, anti-racism, conscious and unconscious bias, culturally responsive practices, diversity training, equity, microaggressions, multiculturalism, patriarchy, restorative justice, social justice, systemic racism, white privilege, white supremacy and “woke,” among others.

Look, even if you think racism is not a problem in America—an impressive bit of psychological contortion!—surely you'd see there is a problem in banning "social justice" from public-school curriculums. Also, as the State Journal notes, there is no indication that any K-12 school in Wisconsin is teaching CRT, normally the purview of law schools and academic journals. (One right-wing activist said the quiet part out loud on this already, proudly admitting that the goal was to make Critical Race Theory a catch-all term for perceived excesses of the left.) But what's actually happening in reality is irrelevant.

"The idea that we are going to say that one race is superior, that one religion is better than the other, that one sex has certain characteristics that make it better than the other, that is preposterous, it should never happen," Assembly Speaker Robin Vos said Tuesday. Great! Luckily, no one is suggesting that and it isn't happening. (Vos of course had the unmitigated gall to quote Martin Luther King, Jr. later in this slapdick treatise.) This is a neat look into the psychology here, though, which boils down to the old adage that when you're used to privilege, equality feels like oppression. Acknowledging that Milwaukee's history and its present have been fundamentally informed by redlining policies that enforced racial segregation is not a statement that Black people are superior to white people. It happened, it is bad, and we should talk about it and do something about it.


Photo credit: ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS - Getty Images

It's funny that Vos brought up religion, though, and not just because he hails from the same party as many of the folks who can be found hollering that America is a Christian nation. (James Madison is having a terrible day, wherever he may be.) All this reminds me of my days in catechism class, where asking the wrong question could shut down the discussion and possibly get you on God's naughty list. Even discussing the prospect that Black people might have a bumpier ride in America is a grave horror, it seems. The only solution, in the free state of Wisconsin, is for the government to ban such discussions in public schools. Just like in catechism class, the mark of a strong argument is refusing to have one at all. Helpfully, the State Journal provides the full list of words that, according to Republican Chuck Wichgers of Muskego, the government intends to prohibit:

Critical Race Theory (CRT)

Action Civics

Social Emotional Learning (SEL)

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI)

Culturally responsive teaching

Abolitionist teaching

Affinity groups

Anti-racism

Anti-bias training

Anti-blackness

Anti-meritocracy

Obtuse meritocracy

Centering or de-centering

Collective guilt

Colorism

Conscious and unconscious bias

Critical ethnic studies

Critical pedagogy

Critical self-awareness

Critical self-reflection

Cultural appropriation/misappropriation

Cultural awareness

Cultural competence

Cultural proficiency

Cultural relevance

Cultural responsiveness

Culturally responsive practices

De-centering whiteness

Deconstruct knowledges

Diversity focused

Diversity training

Dominant discourses

Educational justice

Equitable

Equity

Examine “systems"

Free radical therapy

Free radical self/collective care

Hegemony

Identity deconstruction

Implicit/Explicit bias

Inclusivity education

Institutional bias

Institutional oppression

Internalized racial superiority

Internalized racism

Internalized white supremacy

Interrupting racism

Intersection

Intersectionality

Intersectional identities

Intersectional studies

Land acknowledgment

Marginalized identities

Marginalized/Minoritized/Under-represented communities

Microaggressions

Multiculturalism

Neo-segregation

Normativity

Oppressor vs. oppressed

Patriarchy

Protect vulnerable identities

Race essentialism

Racial healing

Racialized identity

Racial justice

Racial prejudice

Racial sensitivity training

Racial supremacy

Reflective exercises

Representation and inclusion

Restorative justice

Restorative practices

Social justice

Spirit murdering

Structural bias

Structural inequity

Structural racism

Systemic bias

Systemic oppression

Systemic racism

Systems of power and oppression

Unconscious bias

White fragility

White privilege

White social capital

White supremacy

Whiteness

Woke

All these specifics, though, are a sideshow. As with all the other state governments trying to police speech, the Wisconsin legislature has no legitimate role here. A parallel bill is determined to ban private companies from doing diversity training for employees! This is the kind of thing the First Amendment was actually concerned with, as opposed to college students telling you to fuck off. The latter is what this country is all about.
OF COURSE THEY DID
'Entitled Know-It-Alls' Ivanka Trump And Jared Kushner Hijacked COVID Response, Book Says

Mary Papenfuss
Fri, October 1, 2021

Obnoxious know-it-allsIvanka Trump and husband Jared Kushner hijacked the nation’s first major response to the COVID-19 pandemic last year just as deaths from the disease were escalating — and botched it, former White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham reveals in her new book.

The couple, who had no experience in government or with government policy, had no business being top White House advisers to then-President Donald Trump, Grisham wrote in her book, “I’ll Take Your Questions Now,” according to an excerpt published Friday by Politico.

When Grisham initially worked as Melania Trump’s press secretary, “we had all” — including the first lady — “come to call Jared and Ivanka ‘the interns’ because they represented in our minds obnoxious, entitled know-it-alls,” she recounted.

As the coronavirus pandemic — “one of the most important crises to hit the country in a century” — emerged, the “interns were behaving true to form,” Grisham added.

After the World Health Organization first declared COVID-19 a pandemic in March 2020, the couple insisted in an Oval Office meeting that Donald Trump deliver a televised address to the nation, according to Grisham.

“Ivanka kept chiming in, ‘But I think there should probably be an address to the nation tonight,’” Grisham wrote. “Finally, Ivanka turned to her most powerful ally besides her father. ‘Jared, don’t you agree?’”

Then the push was on. The big question: What was the message?”

Eventually, Donald Trump directed everyone — including Vice President Mike Pence and Dr. Anthony Fauci — to exit into the Cabinet Room and “figure out what to do,” according to the former press secretary.

Kushner, who was “sitting next to the vice president of the United States, commandeered the meeting and was calling all the shots,” Grisham recalled.

“As many times as I had seen him behave that way with members of senior staff, that particular time made me uneasy because it was with the vice president. It was disrespectful, and I remember feeling both embarrassed and disgusted,” she added.

Despite Kushner’s power in the White House, he “was not an expert on anything he advised — shutting down borders, the economic consequences, the health consequences — yet he alone seemed to be deciding the nation’s first actions to address one of the most devastating crises in our history,” Grisham wrote.

Meanwhile, “Ivanka was also doing her ‘my father’ wants this and ‘my father’ thinks that routine, making it impossible for staff members to argue a contrary view,” she noted.

Kushner ended up writing Trump’s speech, but it included a “number of misstatements and sloppy wording,” and it “sowed confusion,” Grisham wrote, and the staff had to deal with the fallout.

Grisham says in the book that she told Donald Trump “many times” that if he lost reelection in 2020 it “would be because of Jared.”

It “was my fervent opinion that his arrogance and presumption had grown over the years, and he threw his power about with absolutely no shame,” she wrote. And when things turned out badly, he would always blame others, added Grisham, who called Kushner “Rasputin in a slim-fitting suit.”

Kushner, who was slammed by medical experts a year ago for comparing COVID-19 to the common flu, didn’t end his involvement in the nation’s coronavirus response with the speech. He met with his own team developing some kind of COVID plans even though Pence was supposed to be in charge.

The late Sen. Robert F. Kennedy’s grandson Max Kennedy volunteered to work on Kushner’s COVID-19 task force and ended up sending a complaint to Congress about what he had witnessed.

Kennedy detailed a poorly managed operation to procure desperately needed medical supplies run by an inexperienced crew of volunteers. There appeared to be no vision, no strategy and no real leadership, he said. He described the operation as a “family office meets organized crime, melded with ’Lord of the Flies.’”

Kushner reportedly predicted last year that New York would “suffer” with COVID, coldly adding, “That’s their problem.” He said the “free market” would solve the problem and that fighting a pandemic is “not the role of government.”

More than 400,000 Americans died of COVID during the Trump administration. As of Friday, the death toll had reached nearly 700,000.

Read the full excerpt from Grisham’s book in Politico here.

Also on HuffPost

This article originally appeared on HuffPost and has been updated.