Thursday, December 09, 2021

People Are Spamming Kellogg’s Job Applications in Solidarity with Striking Workers

r/antiwork is trying to flood Kellogg's applications system after the company announced it would replace 1,400 striking workers.













By Samantha Cole
9.12.21


Kellogg is seeking people to work in its factories to replace union workers who are striking for better wages and working conditions—and people on the antiwork subreddit are flooding the company’s job portal website with fake applications in solidarity with those workers.

In October, Kellogg’s workers shut down factories in cereal production facilities in Battle Creek, MI, Lancaster, PA, Memphis, TN and Omaha, NE. The striking workers are members of the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union; they’ve been in negotiations with the company since September, after Kellogg's proposed pay and benefits cuts while forcing workers to work severe overtime as long as 16-hour-days for seven days a week. Some workers stayed on the job for months without a single day off. The company refuses to meet the union’s proposals for better pay, hours, and benefits, so they went on strike.


Earlier this week, the company announced it would permanently replace 1,400 striking workers.


In a Reddit post in the r/antiwork subreddit—which recently mobilized to hack businesses’ receipt printers to send out anti-work messaging—the user BloominFunions listed each of the job application sites and suggested that spamming the systems would throw some grit into Kellogg’s gears.

“It’s time to clog their toilet of an application pipeline,” they wrote. “Using the job posting links above, submit an application for one or more sites. When you apply, pretend you’re a resident of one of the cities with a Kellogg strike (Omaha, Battle Creek, Lancaster or Memphis) and make up an address and phone number using the zip codes and area codes listed below. This way they can’t filter out our apps easily.”

They also suggested downloading a sample resume from Google Images to send with the fake applications.

The job applications blame the union workers for labor shortages at the factories. “The Unions representing Kellogg employees in these plants are on strike, and we are looking for employees to permanently replace them, joining hundreds of Kellogg salaried employees, hourly employees, and contractors to keep the lines running,” the job descriptions state. These job listings have been up since at least October.


LAUREN KAORI GURLEY19.10.21


"We're working 12 to 16 hours a day to meet the increased demand in the cereal market," Kerry Williams, an 18-year employee of Kellogg’s, told Motherboard in October at the start of their strike. "I’ve worked for two years with no weekends off other than vacation days. You miss out on a lot—family time, don’t get to see kids play sports, don't get to see your spouse."

Reddit users band together showing support for Kellogg’s workers on strike

By Julian Paras,
FOX 13 Memphis WHBQ
57 minutes ago


MEMPHIS, Tenn. — The strike against Kellogg is garnering national attention.

People on the internet want to show support for the workers, and that’s exactly what’s happening here on Reddit.

After workers voted down a new labor deal, Kellogg’s said it would hire replacements at four plants, including in Memphis.

With more than 50,000 reactions and more than 3,000 comments, Reddit users want a piece of the action on behalf of the workers.

It’s something Donnie Millbrooks, a striking Kellogg’s worker in Memphis, said he didn’t know about until I told him.

“That’s my first time hearing about it, but it’s actually a good thing,” said Millbrooks.

The Reddit thread wants people to apply online sending hundreds, maybe thousands of applications to locations in Memphis, Nebraska, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.

Through this process, they hope to do one thing, and that is clogging the application pipeline.

Supporters said it gives strikers more ground to stand on against Kellogg’s.



“I think it’s great. I mean, Kellogg’s is doing this to their people, so they’re giving them a taste of their own medicine,” said Supporter Stephanie Sanderlin.

One striker said the support is appreciated but could be counter-productive depending on how it plays out. They continue to spread this message as they receive this support.

“We really want people to understand what we’re out here fighting for because if it’s not us it’s going to be somebody else,” said Millbrooks.

Millbrooks believes a response like the one on Reddit is accepted.

“Don’t know if it’s right or wrong, but it supports and we’re good with that,” said Millbrooks.

Kellogg’s released a statement saying they are ready to hire and are expecting new employees very soon.

Millbrooks said the strike will continue, and they said if Kellogg’s is willing to talk, then they’re willing to get back to work.

“We’re ready. Y’all call us tomorrow. We’re ready to go. Let us know where we got to go. We’re there,” said Millbrooks.

PERSPECTIVE

Mobilize the working class against the strikebreaking drive at Kellogg’s!


The World Socialist Web Site urges workers everywhere to come to the defense of 1,400 strikers at Kellogg’s in the United States, who are being threatened with being permanently replaced by management after they overwhelmingly rejected a sellout contract on Sunday.

The move to break the strike through mass firing amounts to a declaration of war on workers everywhere. Using the tactics appropriate to a dictatorship, management is declaring that workers must accept what they are offered, and that any resistance will be met by company and state violence to forcefully remove workers from their jobs and strip them of their livelihoods.

The defense of the Kellogg strike is an urgent task for all workers, who must answer these threats with a national and international campaign. A network of rank-and-file solidarity committees must be built, drawing together Kellogg's workers around the world and workers across different industries and prepare common action to defeat this strikebreaking assault.

Striking Kellogg's workers stand outside the company's cereal plant in Omaha, Neb., Thursday, Dec. 2, 2021. (AP Photo/ Josh Funk)

Overwhelming experience has shown that the unions will do nothing to defend the strike; if this attack is to be defeated, workers must organize the counter-attack themselves.

Workers everywhere will recognize issues in the Kellogg’s strike that are universal. Kellogg’s workers are fighting against poverty wages, brutal working hours, and the continued exposure of workers to infection and death from COVID-19. The contract they rejected included wage increases of only 3 percent, less than half the current rate of inflation. Worse, it would have eliminated caps on the number of second-tier “transitional” workers that the company hires.

Significantly, the rejection came even though the company had offered to move many current second-tier workers up into the higher-paid “legacy” tier, in a transparent attempt to prey upon the economic insecurity of the new hires and pit young and old workers against each other. The vote shows that workers saw through this and rejected this divide-and-conquer strategy.

That the deal was even brought to a vote was a betrayal of the more than two-month-long strike by the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers’ International Union (BCTGM), which is functioning as management’s police force. The BCTGM attempted unsuccessfully to ram this contract past workers as quickly as possible by forcing them to vote immediately following informational meetings last Sunday.

The BCTGM has not even acknowledged the move to hire permanent strikebreakers on either its website or its social media pages. This silence bespeaks consent. It is just as determined to shut down the strike as management is and will cross any boundary in order to accomplish this.

This is not the first time that such threats have been made or carried out this year. For months, management at the St. Vincent’s hospital in Worcester, Massachusetts, has been hiring replacements to break a strike by nurses that has lasted most of the year. Management also threatened striking distillery workers at Heaven Hill, Kentucky, with mass firings this October. At John Deere, executives said they would not rule out replacing strikers. In each of these cases, the unions did nothing to oppose these threats, or even to inform other workers about them.

The turn towards open strikebreaking is a return to the methods used by the ruling class in the 1980s to shatter the resistance of workers to mass layoffs and wage cuts. It was pioneered by the Reagan administration to defeat the PATCO air traffic controllers strike 40 years ago in 1981.

The critical role was played by the AFL-CIO union bureaucracy, which secretly reassured Reagan that it would not do anything to defend the air traffic controllers, in spite of overwhelming support in the working class for a general strike. This opened up a period in which unions collaborated with management to defeat one strike after another, while carving out for themselves a piece of the action by establishing corrupt corporatist financial relations with the companies that gave them a direct stake in enforcing concessions.

Since then, the unions have worked jointly with the companies to drive down conditions in the United States and around the world to a virtual subsistence level. At Kellogg’s, the workforce in the US is only a fraction of what it was 25 years ago. Working days of 12 and even 16 hours are the norm, as they are for millions of other workers in the so-called wealthiest country in the world. This enabled the ruling class to enrich themselves to new heights, and inequality has reached the highest levels on record.

The ruling class, and in particular the Democratic Party, sees in the unions a critical instrument for the suppression of the class struggle. President Biden, who never tires of calling himself the most “pro-union president in American history” and who sent the Secretary of Labor Marty Walsh to the Kellogg’s picket lines in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, has not issued a word of acknowledgment of the strikebreaking threat by management.

Nor has Bernie Sanders, the so-called “democratic socialist” who repeatedly gave BCTGM officials such as Trevor Bidelman a platform to posture as leaders of the working class. Sanders has not even acknowledged the outcome of the vote.

Pseudo-left groups in and around the Democratic Party such as Labor Notes, who continuously promote the BCTGM and the union bureaucracy as a whole and never hinted beforehand that the contract workers were voting on was a sellout, were caught flat-footed by the rejection, and insincerely hailed it after the fact in a bid to maintain their credibility.

The ruling class is terrified that the instruments and mechanisms through which it has suppressed the class struggle, allowing for its massive accumulation of wealth, are breaking down. It is holding in reserve instruments of violence and repression to deploy as needed, and the action at Kellogg’s to break the strike should be seen as a warning.

But without underestimating the danger at Kellogg’s, if management believes that they can resort to open strikebreaking without provoking massive opposition within the working class, they are badly mistaken. It is no longer the 1980s. The period in which the unions were able to carry out betrayals with impunity is over.

A growing wave of rebellion against these outlived organizations, decades in the making, is now underway, and a new atmosphere of determination and boldness is taking hold within the working class.

The mood of anger and opposition is fueled by disastrous social conditions that have been immensely worsened by the criminal response by the ruling class to the pandemic. The subordination of all public health policy to profits and share values has not only led to 800,000 deaths in the US, but the emergence of new, hyper-infectious variants such as Omicron.

While a handful of the super rich are making more money than ever before, the massive transfer of cash into Wall Street is producing rising prices throughout the economy, worsening conditions for billions of workers around the world.

The Kellogg’s strike is part of a broader upsurge in the working class, including strikes earlier in the year at Volvo Trucks and John Deere, and ongoing walkouts by teachers and students in Detroit public schools. The rejection of concessions contracts by nine-to-one margins or even more has become a regular phenomenon over the course of the year, as the trade unions respond with ever more blatant betrayals.

But these desperate maneuvers have only succeeded in obliterating whatever residual illusions remained. Their attempts to sow demoralization and pessimism among workers have not succeeded. Instead, whatever the immediate outcome in each individual struggle, the opposition as a whole continues to grow, tempered by experience.

This is being expressed by the rapid formation of independent rank-and-file committees by workers across the world to oppose the betrayals of the unions and take the initiative into their own hands. At John Deere, Volvo Trucks, Kaiser, auto parts company Dana and elsewhere, the committees have rapidly established themselves as poles of attraction for the opposition, helping workers to not only resist the union sellouts but to organize their own response.

Workers cannot allow the strike at Kellogg’s to be crushed! Rank-and-file solidarity committees should be established at every factory and workplace to prepare action to defend the workers against management’s police-state operations. Kellogg’s workers themselves must form their own rank-and-file committee to take the strike out of the hands of the union and make the broadest appeal to the entire working class.



New Brunswick nurses vote overwhelmingly in favour of strike

Three bargaining units return votes of up to 96% in favour,

 with both sides returning to talks on Tuesday

New Brunswick Nurses Union president Paula Doucet said the mood was 'very jubilant' during vote counting on Monday. (Tori Weldon)

New Brunswick nurses have voted resoundingly in favour of strike action.

About 9,000 members of the New Brunswick Nurses Union began voting last week, with votes being counted Monday at the Delta Hotel in Fredericton.

By late afternoon, union president Paula Doucet confirmed the results of the three bargaining units' votes — with a combined vote of 92 per cent in favour.

"Our nursing home nurses voted 89 per cent in favour ... Our Part 3 nurses — so all of Vitalité, Horizon and [Extramural] — was  91 per cent  and our nurse managers and supervisors 96 per cent," Doucet told CBC News, noting the mood was "very jubilant."

The union and the province are to return to the bargaining table on Tuesday, the first time they have done so since late September.

Doucet declined to comment Monday on what the union will be seeking during bargaining, citing a media blackout. 

"But I think anybody just has to look at recent media reports of working conditions" across the province, she said.

"Right now for a nurse in New Brunswick, it hasn't been great."

Doucet has often warned of the pressures of nursing shortages and the increasing reality of burnout, particularly amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

No job action planned at this time

Doucet noted no strike or other job action is planned at this time.

"We would have to give seven days notice before we take any job action," she said. "In the spirit of going back to the table, that would be where we would want to get our deal, is at the table and not out on the sidewalk."

Erika Jutras, communications manager for the province's Finance and Treasury Board, told CBC News that the province would likewise not be making any statement while talks are ongoing.

The union represents 9,000 licensed practical nurses, registered nurses and nurse practitioners. They have been without a contract since Dec. 31, 2018, and members have twice rejected tentative agreements.

Monday's vote comes just weeks after a strike vote by provincial workers who are members of the Canadian Union of Public Employees.

More than 20,000 public servants, including school bus drivers, educational support staff and workers in transportation, corrections and the community college system, went on strike in late October for more than two weeks. 

The province ordered striking health-care workers, which did not include nurses, back to work using an emergency order. CUPE is challenging the order in court.

The other locals remained on strike. All but one local voted to accept a contract proposal worked out during the strike.

QUEBEC
SAQ workers reject agreement in principle, meaning strike might resume


Selena Ross CTVNews
Montreal.ca Digital Reporter
Monday, December 6, 2021 

MONTREAL -- SAQ workers have rejected the agreement in principle their union reached last week, meaning they may be back on strike.

The 800 workers had temporarily suspended their strike while they waited to vote, but now it's unclear if they'll be stay on the job while their negotiators head back to the table.

The tentative agreement was reached on Nov. 29, last Monday, the union CUPE wrote in a release on Dec. 6.

"The agreement was presented to a general meeting and the employees rejected the agreement by 86 per cent," CUPE said.

The union represents all 800 warehouse and delivery workers for the liquor-control Crown corporation. Their walk-off left many SAQ outlets' shelves bare.


“We had suspended a strike in order to give negotiations one last chance," said Michael Gratton, a union advisor for CUPE.

After the rejection vote, "we will meet tomorrow morning with the executive committee of the union to determine what our next actions will be. Obviously, we will also contact the employer," Gratton said.

The union said its representatives won't be giving any interviews until they have set their action plan.

Related Stories
Surprise! Hundreds of SAQ workers hold unannounced strike Tuesday
Some Montreal bars running dry amid ongoing SAQ strike
Union suspends strike for SAQ workers until November 29 at 5 a.m.
SAQ, warehouse workers reach agreement in principle


USA
Columbia University threatens graduate workers with replacement if they continue strike


The students are striking over better pay, healthcare and third-party arbitration for harassment and discrimination complaints


Student workers rallied on campus to speak out against recent threats of retaliation against striking workers. 
Photograph: Karla Cote/SOPA Images/REX/Shutterstock


Michael Sainato
THE GUARDIAN
Thu 9 Dec 2021

About 3,000 graduate workers at Columbia University in New York City, who have been on strike since 3 November, recently received an email from the university human resources department threatening the workers with replacement if they continue striking.

The strike is the largest active strike in the US.




US school bus drivers in nationwide strikes over poor pay and Covid risk


The email, sent on 2 December by Columbia University human resources vice-president Dave Driscoll, informed workers their positions would be replaced if they continue striking past 10 December.

“Our interpretation of this email is that it’s basically a threat. They are saying here’s the date, December 10. If you’re still exercising your right to engage in protected activity on or after December 10 there’s no guarantee that you’re going to get your job back. So we think that’s the intention of the threat, but we also think that what they’re doing is unlawful,” said Ethan Jacobs, a graduate student worker in the philosophy department at Columbia University and a member of the GWC-UAW Local 2110 bargaining committee.

Jacobs described the unfair labor practice charges filed by the union against the university with the National Labor Relations Board. They include the university enacting a wage freeze and changing wage disbursement schedules earlier this year without negotiating with the union after its members rejected a tentative agreement after a strike in the 2021 spring semester.

According to the National Labor Relations Act, workers who strike to protest unfair labor practices cannot be discharged or permanently replaced. Jacobs expressed the union’s intent to file additional charges with the NLRB over the university’s threat to replace workers on strike.

Graduate workers have been on strike over improved compensation to cover the high cost of living in New York City, a third-party arbitration process for harassment and discrimination complaints and improved healthcare plans for student workers, including dental care and vision coverage.

“Columbia University operates like these early 20th century company towns. For example, I live in an apartment that is owned by Columbia, so the university is also my landlord. They are the source of my health insurance, the source of my job, the source of my academic progress. In nearly every aspect of my life, Columbia has some sort of say in how that goes and that’s really problematic,” added Jacobs.

Over the past several years, graduate student workers at Columbia University have fought for a first union contract with the university, after securing a ruling by the NLRB in 2016 that affirmed graduate students are employees with the right to unionize.

Workers are pushing for a wage floor of $45,000 annually for first-year doctoral students on one-year appointments and a minimum hourly wage of $26 for hourly workers. Current wages vary by department from as low as $29,000 annually for student workers at the School of Social Work to $41,500 for engineering student workers. The hourly minimum wage at the school is $15.

“The pay structure we have now is the subject of our second unfair labor practice charge. We used to get paid in a lump sum at the beginning of the semester. Our pay was never enough to begin with, but people could budget around it,” said Jonathan Ben-Menachem, a graduate student worker in the Department of Sociology, who noted student workers have been forced to sign an attestation form that they were not striking in order to receive pay during the strike.

Columbia University received returns on their endowment of 32.3% in fiscal year 2021, increasing the school’s endowment value to $14.35bn and ending the fiscal year with a $150m operating surplus, recovering from initial financial losses incurred by the Covid-19 pandemic.

Tamara Hache, a graduate student worker in the Latin American and Iberian cultures department and an international student, expressed concerns over the threat of replacement and its impact on the university as a whole, including international students who cannot work outside the university.

“This measure the university is trying to carry out, of this threat, would be incredibly destructive for everyone at the university. It wouldn’t just affect us as graduate student workers, but everyone. The quality of our students’ education and our departments would be terribly impacted,” said Hache.

In response to the threat of replacement, the union is rallying support from undergraduate students, parents, alumni, faculty and the public, and have held protests.

Columbia University said in a statement, “In the face of enormously trying circumstances created by the strike, our first priority is the academic progress of our students, particularly undergraduates whose classes are being disrupted. The message sent last week to the union bargaining committee explaining the university’s approach to spring appointments and teaching assignments was necessary to fulfill that commitment. Replacing instructors who leave the classroom is permitted by US labor law. With respect to striking student workers who return to work after December 10, we will make every effort to provide them with suitable positions, as available.”


Tensions Rise at Columbia as Strikers Fear Retaliation From University

After administrators sent an email saying that students who remained on strike after Friday were not guaranteed jobs next term, union members turned up the heat.

An email sent by university administrators suggesting student workers who were still on strike might not have jobs in the spring sparked outrage on campus.
Credit...Sarah Blesener for The New York Times

By Ashley Wong
Published Dec. 8, 2021
Updated Dec. 9, 2021

Student workers on strike at Columbia formed picket lines that blocked off entrances to campus and prevented other students from getting to class. A giant inflatable fat cat waved in the breeze as dozens of drivers heading down Broadway honked their car horns in support. A 10-foot-banner reading “Fair Contract Now” was unfurled along an overpass on Amsterdam Avenue.

The scenes of protest dotting the campus on Wednesday came six weeks into a strike by the Student Workers of Columbia, a United Auto Workers Local 2110 union with about 3,000 graduate and undergraduate students. The strike, which is being waged over higher pay, expanded health care and greater protections against harassment and discrimination, has embroiled the campus administration in a lengthy struggle with its own student body.

Wednesday’s action brought one of the largest turnouts since the strike began, as union members were joined by members of student worker unions and faculty from New York University, Fordham University and the City University of New York, and labor unions such as Teamsters Local 804.

“Today, I think, there’s a real show that we are the backbone of this university, and without us, the university doesn’t really function,” said Mandi Spishak-Thomas, a doctoral student at the School of Social Work and a member of the union’s bargaining committee.

The picket line came days after Dan Driscoll, the vice president of the university’s human resources department, sent an email to student workers saying that those who did not return to work by Friday were not guaranteed jobs next semester.

“Please note that striking student officers who return to work after December 10, 2021, will be appointed/assigned to suitable positions if available,” Mr. Driscoll said in the email.

The widely circulated email sparked outrage and accusations that the university was attempting to retaliate against strikers.

Scott Schell, a university spokesman, argued that its actions did not qualify as unfair labor practice. He cited the National Labor Relations Act, which says that while firing workers for going on strike is illegal and workers are entitled to get their jobs back after a strike ends, employers are allowed to replace those workers while the strike continues.

“In the face of enormously trying circumstances created by the strike, our first priority is the academic progress of our students, particularly undergraduates whose classes are being disrupted,” Mr. Schell said. “The message sent to explain spring appointments and teaching assignments was necessary to fulfill that commitment.”

Wilma B. Liebman, a former chairwoman of the National Labor Relations Board, said the university seemed to be putting undue pressure on student workers by implying they were guaranteed to keep their jobs only if they were to quit striking now.

“To me, it’s a way of creating fear and doubt and coercing them, essentially, because of that fear and doubt, to abandon the strike,” Ms. Liebman said.



Columbia’s student workers were joined in Wednesday’s picket line by union members and faculty from other universities.
Credit...Sarah Blesener for The New York Times


Several faculty members participating in Wednesday’s picket line said that the email had motivated them to join the union’s efforts. About 100 faculty members held their own protest on campus on Monday.

“That’s part of what I think is driving more faculty to come out,” said Susan Witte, a professor at the School of Social Work. “It was retaliatory, it was inappropriate and it was hugely disturbing.”

Sign up for the New York Today Newsletter Each morning, get the latest on New York businesses, arts, sports, dining, style and more. Get it sent to your inbox.

Ms. Witte added: “As a tenured faculty member, I think that protected employees have a responsibility to speak out on behalf of other employees.”

Local politicians such as Zohran Mamdani, a state assemblyman who represents parts of Queens, also showed up to support picketing union members. Mr. Mamdani said he had gotten messages almost daily from constituents who are graduate students at Columbia.

“These workers are putting everything they have on the line,” he said. “The fact that students are willing to forgo thousands of dollars in wages, the prospect of their future professional opportunities — it speaks to just how dire the situation is.”

In a joint letter to Lee C. Bollinger, the university’s president, Representatives Adriano Espaillat, Jerrold Nadler and Grace Meng, all New York Democrats, called on the university to bargain with union members in good faith. They also emphasized the importance of student workers for the university’s elite reputation and stability.

“As we work to recover from a global pandemic, it is vital that these lengthy negotiations conclude and yield a fair agreement,” they wrote.

Students said the strike had affected undergraduate core courses, particularly larger introductory ones that rely on graduate instructors for grading.

They said they were exasperated and nervous about getting incomplete grades, but they directed most of their irritation at the university.

Izel Pineda, a sophomore at Barnard College majoring in neuroscience, said she felt the university had not offered enough guidance on what would happen to undergraduates whose graduate instructors were striking.

She said she and her friends felt that the university was trying to use undergraduates’ frustration to pressure the union to end the strike, citing a campuswide email this week that linked to an anonymous opinion piece in the Columbia Daily Spectator, written by an undergraduate critical of the strike.

“Columbia has been leaving undergrads out to fend for themselves and mitigate the relationship between the strike and the undergrad class,” Ms. Pineda said.

Julia Hoyer, a Barnard sophomore majoring in history, said the conflict had marred the return to in-person learning.

“It’s been a hard adjustment to begin with,” she said. “But then, with the threat of incompletes because Columbia won’t pay their graduate students a living wage, it’s just unfair to everybody involved.”

The university and the union have been bargaining through a federal mediator for about two weeks. With the end of the semester rapidly approaching, both expressed eagerness to settle on a contract.

“We’re committed to working as hard as we can to reach a fair and equitable agreement as soon as possible to end the disruption to undergraduate studies and campus activity,” Mr. Schell said. “We welcome the union’s willingness to work towards a compromise.”

The union, for its part, proposed a new contract Tuesday that members said contained significant concessions.

“We do want a contract as quick as possible, but we need one that actually gives us the reasonable package that our union has been fighting for,” said Jackson Miller, a doctoral student in material science and a member of the union’s bargaining committee. “We’ll continue to fight until our demands are met.”

Correction: Dec. 9, 2021
An earlier version of this article misidentified one of the unions whose members joined the picket line. It was Teamsters Local 804, not 104.

A version of this article appears in print on Dec. 9, 2021, Section A, Page 27 of the New York edition with the headline: Strikers Fear Retaliation From Columbia.  

University of Manitoba strike ends, students return to class Tuesday

Faculty members voted to accept deal with university late

 Monday evening

Students at the University of Manitoba are back in class Tuesday after faculty members voted to accept a deal with the university end a 35-day strike. (Dana Hatherly/CBC)

Classes are back on at the University of Manitoba Tuesday after striking faculty voted to accept a deal with the university to end a five-week-long strike. 

The University of Manitoba Faculty Association, which represents over 1,200 professors, instructors and librarians at the Winnipeg-based university, went on strike Nov. 2, saying higher salaries are needed to alleviate retention and recruitment problems at the school. 

The union reached a tentative deal with university officials late Sunday night, and members voted on it the following evening.

When the votes were tallied, 881 members voted in favour and 88 were opposed, with 969 out of the union's 1,264 members casting a ballot, a news release from the faculty association says. 

At 35 days, this was the longest strike in the union's history. 

Compensation will be determined through binding arbitration but the two parties reached an agreement on other key issues, UMFA president Orvie Dingwall said. 

"We're grateful to be going to arbitration, but it certainly should not be a necessity to have to go to arbitration when we should be able to bargain these things directly with our employer," she said. 

Improved maternity and parental leave benefits and who determines whether classes are taught online or in person are among the issues the two parties resolved without arbitration, Dingwall said.

Though most of the compensation issues are going to an arbitrator, the two parties also agreed to changes that would ensure the lowest paid and most precariously employed UMFA members are paid fairly, she said. 

Despite the missed class time, university president Michael Bennaroch said he expects students will be able to graduate on schedule.

To make up for the lost time, the fall semester will run past the scheduled end of classes, which was Dec. 10, and the winter semester will run later into April, he said. 

Bennaroch said he's grateful university officials and UMFA reached an agreement when they did. 

"Every day matters right now in terms of finishing the term and getting the winter term started," he said. 

Students should check their email for more detailed information, Bennaroch said.

With files from Meaghan Ketcheson

ONTARIO
Waste collection strike in Peel Region ends, pickups to resume Monday


By Gabby Rodrigues & Ryan Rocca 
 Global News
Posted December 9, 2021 
Workers went on strike beginning Monday. Global News

A labour dispute among a large portion of waste collection workers in Peel Region that forced them to go on strike earlier this week has now resolved, officials say.


The workers began strike action on Monday and some residents in Mississauga, Brampton and Caledon faced delays in the collection of garbage and organics, while recycling and yard waste were not picked up during the labour disruption, region officials said.

The strike involved workers at Emterra Environmental, one of Peel Region’s waste collection contractors.

Officials said Thursday that regular waste collection services for the affected areas will resume on Monday, Dec. 13.

READ MORE: Waste collection disrupted in large part of Peel Region as workers strike

Instructions were provided to residents who were affected by the strike:

If you were scheduled for garbage pickup this week (December 6 – 9), continue to leave garbage and organics at the curb (even on the weekend).
If you were scheduled for recycling pickup for this week (December 6 – 9), continue to hold onto your recycling until your next scheduled recycling pickup day.
Yard waste that was not picked up due to the strike, will be picked up next week (December 13 – 16) in strike-affected areas.
Bulky items will be picked up on your next garbage day.

“For residents in the strike-affected areas, we thank you for your patience this week and ask that you continue to follow the instructions provided, as Emterra works to finish collecting the remaining garbage and organics in these areas,” Director of Waste Management Norman Lee said.

Area of Peel Region affected by the waste collection strike. Region of Peel

Jason Ottey, director of government relations and communications at LiUNA Local 183, told Global News on Monday the strike action came after months of trying to negotiate a new collective agreement with the company.

“It expired on Nov. 18 and unfortunately the disparity between what our members expected was fair and what the company was offering was too great, so as of this morning we were forced to pull our services and go on strike,” Ottey said.

“By far the largest issue right now is the discrepancy in wages,” Ottey continued. “There is another provider, Waste Connections, in the area that is doing the exact same work … and the gap in pay between what our members make and what the members of Waste Connections make is substantial.”

He said Emterra Environmental services approximately two thirds of Peel Region, while Waste Connections services one third.

© 2021 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.
UK 
Night Tube strike: Disruption expected on London Underground's Victoria and Central lines this weekend

Transport for London has advised people to use buses and check their travel plans before heading out into the capital ahead of strikes this weekend.



Thursday 9 December 2021
The Night Tube was suspended at the start of the pandemic

Night Tube services in London will be disrupted again this weekend, as drivers strike in a dispute over new rosters.

Transport for London (TfL) has warned people that journeys on the Central and Victoria lines may be "severely disrupted" from 7pm on Friday and Saturday evening.

Walkouts by Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union members will take place on those lines for eight hours.

Image:People are facing travel disruption on Friday and Saturday

Why are drivers striking?

The union is disputing rosters that they say have been imposed without agreement, with the Night Tube's return only recently announced after 20 months closed.

London Underground (LU) insists drivers will only be required to work up to four night shift weekends a year, and that they have the option of swapping shifts with colleagues.

There will also be no job losses and drivers can stay part-time if desired, LU says.

But RMT general secretary Mick Lynch said that the strike action was due to LU rejecting an offer on Tuesday.

Mr Lynch said: "They are now prolonging a dispute that will cost them more than settling because their managers have made a series of errors and don't want to admit it publicly."

Travel advice for this weekend


Nick Dent, LU's director of customer operations, has apologised to customers for the disruption, urging them to check before travelling on the Victoria and Central lines.

"Consider using buses where possible," he advised.



Post-pandemic travel


The Night Tube's return was announced in October, having been suspended since March 2020 at the start of the coronavirus pandemic.

It was meant to be back from 27 November, in time for the busy Christmas period.

Follow the latest COVID-19 news in our live blog

"We know this is the last thing London needs at the moment as it tries to recover from the pandemic," said Mr Dent.

There are already concerns that the government's new Plan B measures will result in lower footfall on public transport because of the work from home guidance.


London braces for further tube strikes amid new plan to shed 600 jobs

Unions condemn TfL pre-Christmas move to reduce customer service posts as ‘cynical’ and ‘shameless’


TfL is poised to impose a recruitment freeze on customer services jobs. 
Photograph: James Manning/PA


Gwyn Topham Transport correspondent
@GwynTopham
Tue 7 Dec 2021 18.03 GMT

London could be hit by further tube strikes after transport bosses outlined plans to shed 600 posts to combat the effects of the pandemic on the capital’s finances.

Transport for London (TfL) is poised to impose a recruitment freeze on customer services jobs, with about 250 currently unfilled and further 350 posts to go as and when staff leave.

The RMT union said it would ballot its London members for industrial action to stop what it called a “cynically engineered crisis”, while the TSSA union said the timing before Christmas was “shameful”.

TfL said discussions were at an early stage, but the underground would remain well staffed, with more than 4,500 customer service staff across the network.

Nick Dent, London Underground’s director of customer operations, said: “The devastating impact of the pandemic on our finances has made a programme of change urgently necessary.

“The safety and security of customers and colleagues is still our top priority, and we will ensure in all circumstances our staff will continue to be visible and available to help customers at all times – including offering the on-demand turn up and go service to assist disabled customers.”

Strikes have already been called in response to changes over working conditions around the night tube, with RMT members on affected lines walking out at weekend evenings until Christmas, and a 24-hour strike scheduled for 18 December.


Boris Johnson says unions are 'holding gun' to London's head with tube strike


More widespread action is now likely, with the RMT fearing the plan to axe 600 posts is the start of further cuts, with the government imposing stringent conditions on the funds it has given to London.

The RMT general secretary, Mick Lynch, said TfL’s crisis had “been deliberately engineered by the government to drive a cuts agenda which would savage jobs, services, safety and threaten the working conditions and‎ pensions of our members … The politicians need to wake up to the fact that transport staff will not pay the price for this cynically engineered crisis.”
Advertisement

Lorraine Ward, the TSSA’s organising director, said the union would fight job losses: “We need to encourage more people on to public transport, but cutting station staff will damage that effort. Staff are already fearful for their futures and the way that London Underground has snuck this out just weeks before Christmas is shameful.

London has appealed to central government for more emergency funding to cover the shortfall in revenue, with billions lost in tube fares since passengers were told to avoid public transport at the start of the pandemic.

While demand has come back to about 60% of pre-pandemic levels on weekdays, a TfL report on travel trends published this week said that demand may stay below previous forecasts, with an expected rise in journeys not materialising after “freedom day” when Covid restrictions were lifted in July. It said 84% of workers expect to have some form of hybrid working in future, with only about 70% of people yet returning to city workplaces at all.

Talks have started between TfL and the government before an 11 December deadline, when the current deal runs out. TfL is looking for a further £1.7bn in funding until April 2023, but even under the existing settlement it has committed to reduce expenditure.

The transport commissioner, Andy Byford, has warned that without support London faces a “bleak future” of managed decline, while the city’s mayor, Sadiq Khan, has said there would be “no choice but to make significant cuts to services just as demand is growing again”.

A government spokesperson said: “We will continue to discuss any further funding requirements with TfL and the mayor, and any support provided will focus on getting TfL back on to a sustainable financial footing in a way that is fair to taxpayers across the country.”

Tube and bus services face cuts as TfL will ‘run out of money’ in four days

Comment
James Hockaday
Wednesday 8 Dec 2021
Sadiq Khan has urged the Government to save TfL from service cuts and ‘managed decline’ (Picture: Metro.co.uk)

More funding is needed to save the capital’s transport network from a ‘cycle of decline’ that has ‘plagued’ the city, business leaders warn.

Since the start of the pandemic, Transport for London (TfL) has secured more than £4billion in funding through three government bailouts to keep its Tube and bus services running.

But its current deal runs out on December 11 and Transport Secretary Grant Shapps is yet to meet with Mayor Sadiq Khan to discuss another rescue package.

If a deal isn’t cut in time, it could mean bus routes will have to be reduced by a fifth, while London Underground services would be cut by almost 10%.


The cancellation of supply chain contracts is also expected to affect 43,000 jobs in Derby, Falkirk, Bolton, Liverpool, Yorkshire, and Ballymena, Northern Ireland.

Concerns also remain that the Bakerloo Line will be permanently closed as a way of cutting costs.

Bus services would have to be cut by almost 10% unless the transport network gets another bailout (Picture: Getty Images)

Earlier this week Khan told CityAM there had been ‘no engagement’ from Shapps. He added: ‘Time is running out to save TfL from a managed decline scenario.

‘I hope the government will get round the table in the next few days so we can save London’s transport network, and with it the economic recovery in the capital and wider country.’

However a government spokesperson said the issue was that Khan ‘agreed to identify new or increased income sources’ by November 19, but that ‘these have not been identified’.

A £1.6billion bailout was agreed in May 2020, followed by a £1.8billion deal in November, which was extended until the end of May.

A third deal in June provided a further £1.08billion to keep the transport network afloat.

The Mayor of London says there has been ‘no engagement’ from Whitehall over the crisis (Picture: AP)

At the start of the pandemic, TFL’s fare revenues plummeted by 90%, and there has been a similar fall in income from advertising, the BBC reports.

There were 200million bus and Tube journeys in the four weeks to mid-October – compared to 271million in the same period of February 2020.

TfL needs £500million from central government to keep services running this year and much more to save the network in the long-run.

A group of 83 companies, groups and organisations have called for a fair deal to be reached with the transport body to ensure the capital has proper infrastructure to support its economy.

In a letter to Chancellor Rishi Sunak, they said: ‘As leaders of a diverse range of businesses and organisations, we are writing to express our serious concern about the future of London’s transport.

It is feared the Bakerloo line could be permanently closed down unless more funding is provided (Picture: PA)

‘The decisions taken regarding TfL’s funding in the coming days will have profound and long-term impacts for the UK’s economy, the achievability of the capital’s environmental targets, and the lives of individuals across the wider South East – particularly those who are most disadvantaged and whose communities are amongst those most in need of levelling up.

‘London’s economic success – and the substantial and tangible benefits it delivers for the wider UK – cannot be taken for granted.’

They added that without ‘sufficient financial support to deal with the continued effects of the pandemic we may soon fall back into the cycle of decline that plagued the capital before the creation of Transport for London’.

A Government spokesperson said: ‘We have repeatedly shown our commitment to supporting London’s transport network through the pandemic, providing more than £4billion in emergency funding to Transport for London.

‘We will continue to discuss any further funding requirements with TfL and the mayor, and any support provided will focus on getting TfL back on to a sustainable financial footing in a way that is fair to taxpayers across the country.’

USA
Steelworkers union warns workers about potential strike early next year at Newport News Shipbuilding

By DAVE RESS
DAILY PRESS |
DEC 08, 2021 

Steelworkers at Newport News Shipbuilding have been told to prepare to strike early next year. (Jonathon Gruenke/Daily Press)

With no bargaining sessions planned before the traditional Christmas break at Newport News Shipbuilding, United Steelworkers local 8888 has warned its members to be ready for a walkout next year.

“There is no way to sugarcoat the bruising fight ahead,” the union said in a letter distributed to members this week, while promising to “do everything possible to settle” on an acceptable contract.

“The company must know we are prepared to walk out and stay out to get the contract we deserve,” the letter added.

The union represents more than 10,000 of the shipyard’s 25,000 employees. Last month, members rejected a tentative contract agreement by a 1312-684 vote. That proposed contract had a 60-month term, with annual pay increases, a $2,500 bonus and improvements to pension plans.

“Voting down the first contract offer definitely got the Company’s attention. But it will take much, much more — bold collective action and personal sacrifice — to resolve this contract dispute,” the union’s letter said. “No one wants to go through the economic hardship that comes with missing paychecks and scrambling to make ends meet.
Advertisement

“But the best way to prevent a strike is to prepare for one – seriously.”

The letter said union leaders were laying the groundwork for organizing picket lines, as well as assistance programs for union members.

The union said letters the shipyard mailed to every member’s home detailing its interpretation of the contract was “old tactic was intended to divide the membership.”

The shipyard didn’t respond to requests for comment.

The union’s last strike was in 1999. That lasted 17 weeks. It ended when union members accepted a 58-month contract that guaranteed at least two promotions for most workers, raise pay 23 percent and pensions 78 percent.


Local 8888 was recognized in 1979, after a strike that included a confrontation between shipbuilders and club-swinging police now remembered by older union members as Bloody Monday.




Dave Ress
Staff Writer
Dave Ress covers the military. He's been a reporter in Virginia since 1990 and before that for Reuters in Canada, Britain and Africa. Dave has a PhD in history from the University of New England (Australia) and is the author of 4 books on U.S. and Australian history.
SCOTLAND
UK nuclear weapons workers to go on strike at Clyde base in row over pay

EXCLUSIVE: Specialist staff at Coulport will down tools in a row that a union claims could threaten the operational capacity of the UK's nuclear deterrent.



Chris McCall
Deputy Political Editor
 9 DEC 2021
Contractors employed to maintain the weapons systems used on Trident submarines will walk out next week (Image: PA)

Contractors employed to maintain the weapons systems on Trident nuclear submarines are set to walk out on strike next week in a row over pay.

Specialist staff at the the Coulport armaments base on Loch Long will down tools for 24 hours on both December 16 and 20 unless a last minute deal with bosses can be reached.

Further days of strike action are scheduled on January 11 and 25 as well as February 8 and 22.

Unite the union has called for the ABL Alliance - which employs the civilian workers - to offer a pay rise of 3.8 per cent in line with inflation.

The high security Coulport base by the Firth of Clyde is the storage facility for nuclear warheads which are loaded on to Royal Navy submarines based at nearby Faslane.

Staff involved are employed by three separate private companies - AWE, Babcock Marine, and Lockheed Martin UK Strategic Systems - which form part of the ABL Alliance, a joint venture which won a 15-year contract from the Ministry of Defence in 2013 to maintain weapons systems on the Clyde.

The union has heavily criticised the ABL Alliance for its “delay tactics” after 90.5% of its members at Coulport previously voted yes in support of strike action.

It has claimed strike action at such a strategically important naval base is unprecedented in recent times.

The Ministry of Defence (MOD) insisted the safe management of Coulport "would not be compromised" by any strike action.

Sharon Graham, Unite general secretary, said: “For months now these extremely profitable companies have dragged their feet over giving our members the fair pay award they deserve.

"Unite’s priority is to fight for the jobs, pay and conditions of our members, and these highly skilled workers at Coulport and Faslane naval bases have the union’s full support in this dispute.”

Stevie Deans, Unite regional coordinator, said: “The ABL Alliance employers have completely disrespected, undervalued and underappreciated our members. Unite has continually sought to resolve this pay dispute but the ABL Alliance at every stage of the process have seem determined to force an escalation.

"Our members have been left with no choice but to take strike action in addition to the overtime ban, and we are determined to get the pay rise these workers deserve.”

An MOD spokesman said: “The UK Government is aware of the ongoing pay negotiations between the ABL Alliance and the Unite trade union and we are hopeful that a resolution will be reached by all parties.

“The continued safe operation of HM Naval Base Clyde is of paramount importance and the safe management of the port will not be compromised.”
Holdout unions approve contract, Disneyland averts strike

The Harbor Boulevard entrance to the Disneyland Resort in Anaheim.
(Chris Carlson / Associated Press)
STAFF WRITER DEC. 8, 2021

Disneyland heads into the holidays without any picket lines outside its gates following a second contract vote that finally found favor with two remaining unions.

The Master Services Council, a coalition of four major unions that represents 9,500 workers at the Disneyland Resort, bargained with the company for months before reaching a tentative agreement in November.

All member unions ratified the contract at Disney’s California Adventure during the initial Nov. 17 vote, but Disneyland saw an unprecedented split.

Teamsters Local 495, which is the largest member of the coalition, and Service Employees International Union-United Service Workers West soundly rejected the company’s proposal at Disneyland, which included pay raises to $18.50 an hour by 2023 and seniority-based bonuses.

The holdout unions represent ride operators, parking and custodial staff respectively at the theme park.

Union leaders met with the company, which agreed to present its “last and final” offer for another round of voting, though it wasn’t obligated to. After all the votes were tallied by Dec. 3, both unions ratified the contract and averted a strike.

“The Disneyland Resort is pleased that cast members of the Disneyland Park represented by the Master Services Council ratified a new collective bargaining agreement,” said a Disneyland spokesperson. “Cast members from Disney California Adventure Park and Downtown Disney District previously ratified the same offer on Nov. 17th. We are proud of the competitive wage and benefit offer, which provides historical increases over three years, continuing to outpace the California minimum wage.”

Initially, the first round rejection sent a wave of confusion through the park’s workers.

Two other Disneyland unions, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 324 and Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers’ International Union Local 85, also comprise the Master Services Council but didn’t have to cast their ballots a second time.

In an update to its members, UFCW Local 324 cited a “large majority” having voted to approve the contract on Nov. 17. The company considered the union-specific tally to be a ratification.

Ahead of the rare revote, SEIU-USWW deemed the original proposal as the “highest general wage increases ever negotiated with Disney.” And, although members rejected ratification by 60 percent on Nov. 17, the tally fell short of the 75% needed to authorize a strike, per the union’s Constitution and bylaws.

Another strike authorization vote would be needed. If workers did vote to go out on strike, they wouldn’t be entitled to California unemployment insurance.

Meanwhile, some Teamster members renewed a push for wage increases to $20 an hour that they’d hoped would have been part of the original offer.

“I feel that all of us at Disneyland deserve more,” said Gabriel Ramos, a Teamster and Disneyland ride operator who voted no both times. “Many people voted yes the second time because they saw that the union wasn’t prepared for a strike, even though the majority of the members wanted to strike.”

The Disneyland Resort’s proposed contract remained identical. The minimum wage increase to $17.50 an hour would be pulled forward to Nov. 17 instead of taking effect June 2022.

Had the unions rejected the offer for a second time, workers were told that seniority-based bonuses and the retroactive raises were poised to be scrapped.

But more than two weeks of uncertainty came to an end when both holdout unions changed course and ratified the contract in joining the rest of their Master Services Council counterparts.

The early pay raises are effective for both Disney theme parks.

Disneyland hasn’t seen a major labor strike since 1984 when thousands of workers picketed outside of the theme park for 22 days in what remains the largest work stoppage in the theme park’s history.