Friday, March 07, 2025

 

New technical guidelines pave the way for widespread adoption of methane-reducing feed additives in dairy and livestock



In a special issue of the Journal of Dairy Science a global team of experts synthesizes decades of nutrition innovation on feed additives for methane reduction




Elsevier





Philadelphia, March 7, 2025  After many decades of research, the dairy sector has a significant body of peer-reviewed research showing that feed additives can effectively reduce methane, the greenhouse gas that makes up most of dairy’s environmental footprint. Yet the practical use of this knowledge on farms—as well as general awareness around additive effectiveness and safety—is still gaining momentum. At this critical point in the dairy sector’s pathway to a net-zero future, the Journal of Dairy Science, the leading general dairy research journal from the American Dairy Science Association (ADSA), published by Elsevier, has released a special issue translating this nutrition innovation into detailed technical recommendations on developing and implementing feed additives. The result is a feed additive toolkit to help researchers, dairy professionals, product developers, producers, and consumers fill knowledge gaps and supercharge feed additive adoption to reduce dairy’s environmental footprint today and into the future.

This issue, Feed Additives for Methane Mitigation, presents the first outcomes of a flagship project by the Feed and Nutrition Network of the Global Research Alliance on Agricultural Greenhouse Gases’ Livestock Research Group. David Yáñez-Ruiz, PhD, of the Spanish Research Council (CSIC; Granada, Spain), one of the project’s co-leads, explained, “This collaborative effort gathered 60 leading researchers from 46 institutions across 23 countries to form a robust network of scientists dedicated to reducing methane emissions from ruminants, which is a crucial goal as we combat climate change.”

André Bannink, PhD, of Wageningen University & Research (Wageningen, the Netherlands), the second co-lead of this initiative, added, “Our goal is to provide the scientific community and livestock sector with technical guidelines on best practices for developing and testing feed additives, which we know is currently our most powerful methane-reduction tool.”

The issue’s introduction provides an overview of all six articles and explains the overall goals of the project team. Journal of Dairy Science Guest Editor Michael Kreuzer, PhD, professor emeritus at ETH Zurich (Lindau, Switzerland), explained, “Because of huge scientific leaps forward, we, as a society, now have the technical knowledge available to help each country, region, and farm find a path to methane reduction tailored to their unique need. It’s time then to turn the attention of scientists, extensionists, industry, and farmers to the actual application of this knowledge on a broader scale.”

The first step in developing feed additives is to find and test the actual bioactive compounds that inhibit methane produced by microorganisms in the digestive tract of animals. The guidelines open with recommendations for this process, including two different approaches for selecting the compounds—empirical (screening compounds already identified in databases) or mechanistic (discovering new and unidentified compounds based on our knowledge of animal biology). Once selected, the authors outline the initial lab tests needed to understand the compounds’ impact on methane, considering factors such as dosage, formulation, and how they might interact with an animal’s diet and the complex microbial fermentation in the rumen. 

Once tested in a lab, the next step is to trial feed additives with animals to understand their efficacy and safety. The second article in the special issue provides guidelines for designing and conducting these studies to meet the most rigorous standards, including techniques for measuring enteric methane emissions. The guidelines also cover analyzing the resulting data to determine the feed additives’ efficacy in achieving methane reduction and, critically, the safety of these additives for the animals consuming them and the nutritional composition of the final milk and meat products.

As these feed additives are introduced under various farming conditions, future modeling will become increasingly important to understand their effects at different scales and in varying environments. The third article in the special issue includes recommendations and guidelines for modeling the effects of feed additives, including the type of models used, the modeling objectives, and data availability while accounting for synergies and trade-offs. The authors’ recommendations present modeling approaches for understanding an additive’s impact on methane emissions at the farm and national, regional, and global levels.

Dr, Kreuzer commented, “As we work toward a shared and comprehensive understanding of methane-mitigating feed additives, one key gap we need to fill is exactly how these compounds work—or their mode of action.”

The issue’s fourth article explores the best approaches for elucidating the microbiological and biochemical changes that occur when additives are incorporated into a ruminant’s diet. The authors explain that uncovering the mode of action can be a difficult and costly task involving specialized equipment, facilities, and resources. This stage of testing involves identifying which microbes are targeted by the additive to understand the mechanisms happening at the cellular and molecular levels and to map the pathways where the active compounds can be degraded in the animals’ digestive tract. Understanding the specific mode of action of each compound is critical for providing appropriate use recommendations for different livestock production systems. They recommend conducting this research only after lab and animal studies have shown an additive’s effectiveness and safety.

All this testing and modeling lead to the ultimate goal of getting methane-reducing feed additives authorized and approved for official commercial use, which is the topic of the next article in the special issue. Although exact requirements differ from country to country, all additive regulations are enforced to ensure the health and safety of the animals consuming them, the workers manufacturing and handling them, and the consumers enjoying the finished dairy products. The approval process also requires proof that additives are effective for their specific purpose and puts consumer-production guardrails around misleading marketing claims. The authors synthesize the legislation and legal procedures in Australia, Canada, the European Union, New Zealand, South Korea, the United Kingdom, and the United States as examples, offering actionable recommendations for both scientists and applicants seeking official feed additive authorization.

Once approved and deployed commercially, the question, “What kind of emissions impact can we anticipate from these additives in our complex global farming systems?” looms. The special issue concludes with a final article with recommendations for quantifying methane reduction—from individual animal measurements to national-level inventories. It emphasizes the importance of considering factors like the specific additive used, its delivery method, and potential impacts on other parts of the livestock production system. The result is a framework for accurately assessing the potential environmental benefits of feed additives, which is crucial for promoting their widespread adoption and supporting effective emission-mitigation strategies across the livestock sector.

Together, these six articles detail robust technical recommendations from additive development to impact measurement and provide actionable best practices and a roadmap with the potential to contribute significantly to global livestock climate efforts.

Explaining the significance of the special issue, the journal’s editor in chief, Paul Kononoff, PhD, added, “These guidelines represent an enormous, interconnected global effort to ensure that tomorrow’s dairy and livestock sectors can both continue to provide essential nutrition and contribute to a more sustainable future.”

Explore the insights from the special issue via a recorded webinar with the authors, and join them for an in-depth, half-day symposium at the 2025 ADSA Annual Meeting taking place June 22-25 in Louisville, Kentucky.

 

 

New study finds that tooth size in Otaria byronia reflects historical shifts in population abundance




PeerJ
Otaria byronia 

image: 

Changes in tooth size of Otaria byronia: an indicator of density-dependent effects?

view more 

Credit: Image: Ailin Sosa Drouville




Puerto Madryn, Argentina – A new study published in PeerJ Life and Environment reveals that the teeth of South American sea lions (Otaria byronia) hold valuable clues about past population dynamics. Researchers from the Instituto de Biología de Organismos Marinos, the Centro para el Estudio de Sistemas Marinos, and the Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco analysed changes intooth size and growth layer groups (GLGs) over the past century. Their findings suggest that tooth size can serve as a reliable indicator of density-dependent effectson somatic growth.

The study compared male sea lion teeth from two distinct periods: the commercial harvest era, when populations were at their highest, and the postharvest period, when numbers had drastically declined. By measuring tooth length, diameter, and GLG widths, the researchers uncovered clear differences between the two periods.

Key Findings:

·Tooth growth reflects body growth – A significant correlation was found between body length and tooth length in postharvest individuals.

·Smaller teeth during peak population density – Teeth from the harvest period were significantly shorter and thinner than those from the postharvest period.

·Thinner GLGs suggest resource competition – Growth layers were narrower in individuals from the harvest period, likely due to increased intraspecific competition and reduced resource availability.

“Our results show that tooth size and internal growth layers can provide insights into how population density influences somatic growth,” said lead author Dr. Ailin Sosa Drouville. “During the commercial sealing era, competition for food was intense, which likely led to reduced somatic growth. Once populations declined, individual sea lions had better access to resources, resulting in larger teeth and thicker dentine layers.”

Implications for Conservation and Ecology

The study highlights the potential of hard structures like teeth as historical records of ecological conditions. Understanding how population density affects growth canhelp scientists assess past environmental pressures and predict how marine mammals might respond to future changes in population dynamics.

“These findings reinforce the importance of long-term data in understanding how wildlife populations adapt to changing environmental and anthropogenic pressures,” added co-author Dr. Mariano Coscarella. “This knowledge could be particularly useful for managing recovering sea lion populations and anticipating the ecological consequences of future fluctuations in abundance.”

Otaria byronia Skull 

Changes in tooth size of Otaria byronia: an indicator of density-dependent effects?

Credit

Image: Ailin Sosa Drouville

 

Future innovators take over UTA at science fair



Participation spiked as 530 young innovators showcased projects at the 74th Fort Worth Regional Science and Engineering Fair




University of Texas at Arlington

The University of Texas at Arlington hosted 530 of the brightest minds from North Texas’ middle and high schools last month for the 74th Fort Worth Regional Science and Engineering Fair. 

image: 

The fair attracted more students than ever, with the number of participants increasing by more than 25% over 2024. Engineering remains a high-demand field, especially in Texas, where the economy and the population continue to grow.

view more 

Credit: UTA




The University of Texas at Arlington hosted 530 of the brightest minds from North Texas’ middle and high schools last month for the 74th Fort Worth Regional Science and Engineering Fair.

The fair attracted more students than ever, with the number of participants increasing by more than 25% over 2024. Engineering remains a high-demand field, especially in Texas, where the economy and the population continue to grow.

“The depth and breadth of the projects this year are remarkable, with students presenting their original research on everything from using earthworms to remove toxic lead from soil to creating a robotic glove to assist people living with Parkinson’s disease,” said Yuan Bo Peng, professor of psychology at UTA and director of the fair. “They always make me so optimistic about the future of scientific discovery.”

The science fair is one of only two in Texas that does not charge students or their schools an entry fee. Instead, it maximizes fundraising efforts throughout the year to cover costs for things like student awards, honoraria for judges and equipment rentals.

Related: UTA retains top-tier U.S. research status

To qualify for the regional science fair at UTA, students from Cooke, Denton, Erath, Hood, Johnson, Palo Pinto, Parker, Somervell, Tarrant and Wise counties must earn top awards at their local science fairs. Categories include animal sciences, behavioral and social sciences, biochemistry, computer science, earth and planet science, material and bioengineering, mathematical sciences, physics and astronomy, and plant sciences.

Forty-two high school projects and 42 middle school projects presented at the regional fair earned spots for the Texas Science and Engineering Fair to be held at Texas A&M University later this month.

“I’m so grateful to the leadership team here at UTA,” Dr. Peng said. “Together, we helped put together a remarkable event for our students.”

“The depth and breadth of the projects this year are remarkable, with students presenting their original research on everything from using earthworms to remove toxic lead from soil to creating a robotic glove to assist people living with Parkinson’s disease,” said Yuan Bo Peng, professor of psychology at UTA and director of the fair. “They always make me so optimistic about the future of scientific discovery.”

To qualify for the regional science fair at UTA, students from Cooke, Denton, Erath, Hood, Johnson, Palo Pinto, Parker, Somervell, Tarrant and Wise counties must earn top awards at their local science fairs. Categories include animal sciences, behavioral and social sciences, biochemistry, computer science, earth and planet science, material and bioengineering, mathematical sciences, physics and astronomy, and plant sciences.

Credit

UTA

 

Bringing expansion microscopy to plants






Washington University in St. Louis

Hydrogel 

image: 

Instead of relying on lenses to zoom in, expansion microscopy physically enlarges biological tissues by embedding them in a hydrogel, a water-absorbing polymer that can expand without losing its shape.

view more 

Credit: Cox laboratory, Washington University in St. Louis




The way we study plant cells is expanding — literally — thanks to new research from Kevin Cox, an assistant professor of biology in Arts & Sciences at Washington University in St. Louis and an assistant member of the Donald Danforth Plant Science Center. In a new study published in The Plant Journal, Cox and his team describe how they have developed ExPOSE (Expansion Microscopy in Plant Protoplast Systems), a technique that brings expansion microscopy to plants.

Traditional imaging methods often come with trade-offs. “We have the low-end microscopes, which are user-friendly but don’t provide much depth and resolution,” Cox explained. “And then the high-end microscopes, where you have really good resolution and data, but it’s a lot to process, and they’re more expensive.”

That’s where expansion microscopy (ExM) comes in. Instead of relying on lenses to zoom in, ExM physically enlarges biological tissues by embedding them in a hydrogel, a water-absorbing polymer that can expand without losing its shape — the same type of material used in products like baby diapers. As the hydrogel swells, so do the cellular structures, making tiny details easier to see under a standard microscope. So, instead of a zoomed-in picture where individual elements may become blurred or distorted, the physical size of the cells increases, like a sponge in water. Better yet, it’s low cost and accessible.

While ExM has been widely used in animal research, applying it to plants has been challenging. Plant cells have rigid cell walls made of cellulose, which prevent uniform expansion.

Cox and his team tackled this issue by using protoplasts — plant cells with their walls removed — allowing them to successfully adapt ExM for plant research. The result is ExPOSE, a method that helps provide high-resolution, detailed views of plant cells.

With ExPOSE, researchers will now be able to visualize a plant’s cell structures with greater resolution, allowing them to study the precise location of proteins, RNA and other biomolecules. This is important for Cox, whose work is focused on cellular communication and response. “It gives us a better understanding of where these genes and proteins are, how they’re functioning and how they might play a role in cellular response,” he said.

But ExPOSE is just one part of cellular imaging and data collection. Cox asked the question, “What other methods could we couple with this to make it more like a toolkit?” When ExPOSE was used in conjunction with techniques like hybridization chain reaction, commonly known as HCR, and immunofluorescence, Cox and his team found that they were able to see both proteins and RNA in even greater detail.

A powerful new toolkit for plant biology

Although ExPOSE is currently used to study individual cells, Cox envisions an even bigger future for expansion microscopy in plants. “We’re trying to understand spatial information at a cellular level and then also, collectively, at a large scale,” Cox explained. That means using ExPOSE to look at organs, leaves, roots and, eventually, entire plants, where researchers will be able to investigate how these cells are communicating with one another.

At the center of Cox’s research is an unassuming but powerful model organism: duckweed. This small, fast-growing aquatic plant is potentially ideal for studying cellular communication and gene expression. “Because duckweed is so small, it gives us a model to understand what every cell is doing at a given moment,” Cox said. This is particularly useful when studying how plant cells respond to stress, such as infections or environmental changes.

The ultimate goal? Applying this knowledge to crops. By understanding how plant cells talk to each other and defend against threats, researchers could develop more resilient, higher-yielding and faster-growing crops, improving food security and sustainability.
 


Researchers in the Cox laboratory at Washington University in St. Louis used protoplasts — plant cells with their walls removed — to successfully adapt expansion microscopy for plant research.

Credit

Cox laboratory, Washington University in St. Louis

 

Soulmates: USU neuroscientist awarded NSF career grant to study coyote pair-bond formation



Sara Freeman receives grant to study the behavioral, hormonal and neural basis of coyote monogamy




Utah State University

Coyote Pair-Bond Formation 

image: 

Utah State University neuroscientist Sara Freeman conducts systematic investigations of coyote pair-bonding behavior and the neurochemical systems of the coyote brain.

view more 

Credit: Utah Division of Wildlife Resources





LOGAN, UTAH, USA -- Why do we fall in love? Why are parents so fiercely protective of their offspring? Like humans, do some animals grieve for lost mates?

Oxytocin and vasopressin hormonal systems of the brain — responsible for the so-called “tend-and-defend” mechanisms key to romantic and parental love, are neural drivers for the formation of strong, selective social bonds characteristic of pair-bonded adult mammal mates, including humans.

“These evolutionarily ancient hormones are synthesized by the brain and have become primary targets for the study of neural mechanisms of social bonding,” says Utah State University neuroendocrinologist Sara Freeman.

Freeman is among the first researchers in the world to conduct systematic investigations of coyote pair-bonding behavior and the neurochemical systems of the coyote brain. The assistant professor in USU’s Department of Biology recently secured a competitive $1.41 million National Science Foundation Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) grant, one of USU’s largest CAREER awards, to continue the research.

“Monogamy is relatively rare in mammals, and many are surprised to learn coyotes are a monogamous species, as are all wild canid species studied to date,” Freeman says.

While colloquial definitions of monogamy in the human vernacular are based on sexual fidelity, she says, monogamy in biological contexts is a more nuanced concept.

“When studying mammalian monogamies, we’re usually referring to social monogamy, in which two unrelated, opposite sex adult members of the same species defend a shared territory, share resources, spend time in close proximity, show distress upon separation, share parenting duties and primarily, but not exclusively, mate with each other,” Freeman says.

She says biologists who have studied coyotes report the animals exhibit what is called genetic monogamy, where they mate exclusively, for life, and only seek a new partner if a mate dies.

“Genetic monogamy is exceedingly rare in the animal kingdom, especially in mammals,” Freeman says. “Coyotes provide the unique opportunity to investigate this rare and strict form of long-lasting social attachment.”

She says the CAREER grant is a key boost to the continuation of the research.

“The NSF funding affords my students, colleagues and I to assess the connectedness between behavior, brains and hormones to establish a foundation for the neurobiological basis for pair bonding in a canid,” Freeman says. “This work is situated squarely in the field of behavioral neuroendocrinology, which is known for tackling complex, interconnected biological mechanisms.”

She says the proximity of the USDA National Wildlife Research Center Predator Research Field Station, eight miles south of USU’s Logan campus, is also a critical component of the research.

“We have a unique, interdisciplinary collaboration of research specializations, combining neuroscience, endocrinology, wildlife biology, predator management, carnivore ecology and more among our investigators,” she says. “This creates outstanding educational opportunities for our undergraduate and graduate students, along with a conduit to engage with federal researchers, local officials, as well as ranchers, farmers and other land managers.”

Freeman says the project and its NSF funding will enable her to continue offering research opportunities beyond the Logan campus, with continued participation in such programs as USU’s Native American Summer Mentorship Program.

“Through this program, we’ve invited students from USU Blanding and other remote campuses to get involved in our lab and in the field, where they can experience hands-on research and learn about opportunities for graduate study. It’s an exciting and effective way to encourage scholars to pursue careers and further study in the life sciences, health care fields, engineering and conservation management.”

According to the NSF website, the CAREER Award is “the most prestigious award in support of early-career faculty who have the potential to serve as academic role models in research and education, and to lead advances in the mission of their department or organization. Activities pursued (by awardees) building a firm foundation for a lifetime of leadership in integrating education and research.”

###