Friday, June 05, 2026

Unions Condemn Executive Order Allowing Trump to Replace Federal Workers With ‘Political Loyalists’

The head of America’s largest federal workers union called it “a blatant attempt to corrupt the federal government by eliminating employees’ due process rights so they can be fired for political reasons.”


American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) president Everett Kelley speaks alongside Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.) at a press conference on federal workforce rights outside the US Capitol on March 28, 2025 in Washington, DC.
(Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Stephen Prager
Jun 05, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Labor unions are warning that an executive order signed this week by President Donald Trump will allow his administration to replace thousands of career civil servants with “political loyalists.”

The order, signed on Wednesday, converts around 8,000 federal workers—most of whom are at senior levels in the civil service with major influence over policy decisions—to Schedule Policy/Career (P/C) status, formerly known as Schedule F, effectively making them “at-will” employees whom the president can fire at his discretion.

While a small number, around 4,000, of the roughly 2 million federal workers are considered political appointees, most federal employees cannot be removed purely for failing to serve the agenda of the president and can usually only be fired for issues like inadequate performance or misconduct, which involves an appeal process.

But as part of the Trump administration’s effort to dismantle what it’s described as a “deep state” of disloyal bureaucrats, a major objective of the Heritage Foundation’s right-wing manifesto Project 2025, those 8,000 employees may now be fired for “subversion of presidential directives.”

According to the US Office of Personnel Management, this could be just the beginning—with as many as 50,000 employees potentially in consideration to be rescheduled.

A fact sheet released by the White House said that despite the reclassification, “these remain ‘career’ positions and the non-partisan hiring processes, competitive status, and other aspects of these roles will not change,” while “removal decisions will also be made without respect to political affiliation.”

But Trump-loyal department heads—everywhere from the Department of Justice to the Pentagon—have systematically purged employees across executive departments that are perceived as Trump’s political enemies.



AFL-CIO president Liz Shuler said on Thursday that “Schedule P/C is the next phase in Trump’s anti-worker agenda to replace government workers with political loyalists who answer only to him.”

“As we’ve seen from his first day in office, the president is determined to tear down the architecture of our federal government and replace it with a system of corruption to benefit powerful CEOs and billionaire union-busters,” she said.

It’s part of a broader attack on the federal workforce in Trump’s second term. Through a combination of firings, layoffs, and forced resignations, he has reduced the number of government employees by nearly 300,000, causing chaos and understaffing at many agencies. He’s also stripped more than 1 million unionized federal workers of their right to collective bargaining, though courts have blocked the implementation for some workers.



Everett Kelley, the president of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), which represents more than 800,000 federal workers, said Wednesday’s order was “a blatant attempt to corrupt the federal government by eliminating employees’ due process rights so they can be fired for political reasons.”

“The practical implications of this action are clear. Workers who once felt comfortable reporting waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement at their place of employment because they were protected from retaliation will now be afraid for their jobs if they speak out,” he said. “That is a disservice to them and to the millions of Americans who rely on the federal government every day.”

William Shackelford, president of the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association, added that the order “threatens expanded political cronyism, increasing the risk that executive actions will be decided by the size of political contributions rather than the faithful execution of the law.”

“That increases the risk of politically motivated enforcement of laws, threatening individual liberty; politically determined tariff exceptions and contract and grant awards, threatening greater corruption and waste of taxpayer dollars; and politically selective provision of services, threatening failure of government operations for disfavored groups or localities,” he said.

The legal watchdog Democracy Forward has filed a lawsuit against Trump’s rebranding of Schedule F as Schedule P/C at the start of his second term, which the group argued allowed several positions in the traditional nonpartisan civil service to be effectively recast as political appointees.

“For generations, our country has relied on a professional, nonpartisan civil service,” said Skye Perryman, the group’s president and CEO on Wednesday. “The people responsible for protecting our public health, safeguarding our environment, delivering our mail, managing our airports, protecting our public lands, and enforcing our laws should be allowed to do their jobs, not targeted by the same government they serve.”


“When government experts can be fired without cause,” she added, “it’s not just federal workers who are harmed—it’s the people across the country who rely on these essential services every day.”

'A lot of people in there that shouldn’t be there': Trump orders fresh purge of officials


Tom Boggioni
June 5, 2026 
RAW STORY


President Donald Trump has instructed Bill Pulte, the controversial new acting head of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), to execute sweeping personnel cuts across the nation's 18 federal intelligence agencies and units before a permanent successor is confirmed.

In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Trump revealed his explicit mandate to Pulte, who lacks the necessary security clearances, to dramatically reduce the size of an agency he views as "unnecessary and/or too big."

"I'd like to see it smaller. I think there are a lot of people in there that shouldn't be there," Trump admitted to The Journal, specifically targeting career officials from the Biden and Obama administrations. When asked directly if he was ordering firings, Trump confirmed the instruction. "I want him to 'start the process,'" Trump said, adding that his eventual permanent nominee should continue the purge once confirmed.

Trump bluntly framed Pulte's temporary status as an operational advantage rather than a limitation. "You're less shackled," Trump said of the acting designation. "It sort of gives you more power, you know, for a somewhat limited period of time."

The president outlined a calculated strategy to complete major structural changes before his permanent appointee takes office, allowing the future ODNI to inherit a smaller, ideologically aligned agency rather than managing the cuts themselves.

"Frankly, it might be good for him to shake it up before people come," Trump explained. "Because, if he [Pulte] reduced the size, in conjunction with me…and in conjunction with possibly the person coming in…he can do a lot of the hard work and we wouldn't have to saddle somebody that goes in."

The approach reflects Trump's broader effort to reshape the intelligence community according to his preferences, The Journal reported. Pulte, who has no prior intelligence experience and has been highly critical of the FBI and other agencies, is widely viewed as unlikely to survive Senate confirmation despite his acting appointment.

Pulte and ODNI representatives declined to comment to The Journal on the directives.
Summer Lee Condemns Democrats’ Silence After Anti-Muslim Attacks on Tlaib, Hamawy

“The silence from Democrats when Muslim colleagues and candidates are attacked is a cancerous rot.”


Reps. Summer Lee (D-Pa.), Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), and then-Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.) attend the State of the Union address in Washington, DC on March 7, 2024.
(Photo: screenshot/Fox News)

Julia Conley
Jun 05, 202
COMMON DREAMS

Congresswoman Summer Lee spoke at length Thursday evening about recent anti-Muslim attacks that have been launched by Republicans as well as the corporate media against two progressive political leaders—reserving much of her condemnation for Democratic lawmakers who have remained silent as Rep. Rashida Tlaib and US House candidate Adam Hamawy have been both directly and indirectly accused of “terrorism” in recent days.

“Democrats, we are way too quiet right now,” said Lee (D-Pa.) in a three-minute video she posted on her official social media accounts. “This is a moral rot that we are dealing with, and I hope that we will not stand by and let this particular hatred grow and grow until it’s out of our control.”

Lee spoke up a day after Rep. Max Miller (R-Ohio) openly accused Tlaib, the only Palestinian-American member of Congress, of advocating “for terrorists on a daily basis” during a debate on a proposal she introduced to block US forces from taking part in Israel’s invasion of Lebanon—a war powers resolution that ultimately failed to pass Thursday after House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) and more than 100 other Democrats joined the GOP in opposing it.

More than 3,500 Lebanese people have been killed and 1.2 million have been forcibly displaced since Israel began attacking Lebanon in March, in what it says is an effort to defeat Hezbollah. Israeli officials have said they are using the Israel Defense Forces’ (IDF) decimation of Gaza as a “model” in Lebanon.

While Tlaib advocated on the House floor for Lebanese civilians, Miller characterized Hezbollah as “butchers that you like to hang out with to a certain extent,” addressing the progressive congresswoman—prompting her to demand that Miller’s comments be stricken from the record and accusing him of a “direct attack on my character.”

Rep. Brian Mast (R-Fla.), who volunteered to serve in the IDF in 2015, also said supporters of Tlaib’s resolution were acting as “proxies for Hezbollah.”

In her statement Thursday, Lee said, “Yesterday on the House floor, two different Republicans basically called my sister Rashida a terrorist for nothing more than being there, being Palestinian, being Muslim, being a woman.”



She emphasized that the attacks on Tlaib followed similar remarks about congressional candidate Dr. Adam Hamawy, a retired US Army surgeon who volunteered to treat victims of Israel’s assault on Gaza and saved the life of Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) after her helicopter was shot down in Iraq in 2004.


Before voters in New Jersey’s 12th Congressional District went to the polls this week to vote in the primary the progressive Democrat won, opponents attacked him for his former association with Omar Abdel-Rahman, a cleric who was convicted of terrorism in 1995 and whom Hamawy said he met through the Egyptian-American community in New Jersey.

Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.) said Hamawy was “not in line with our values,” and The New York Times focused its subheadline on Abdel-Rahman in its report on Hamawy’s primary victory, before editing the subhead.



“The anti-Muslim rhetoric is picking up,” said Lee on Thursday. “And we don’t often talk about how dangerous that is, and we also don’t talk about how dangerous it is to our coalition. As the Democratic Party, we are supposed to be the ones that are the standard-setters, the ones who are fighting for justice and equal opportunity and liberation, and if we aren’t able to speak up against this right now, then how can we continue to hold that particular mantle?”

“It’s not just Republicans who are dealing in this,” she added. “I’ve heard Democrats use and deal in some of the worst tropes and stereotypes of my Muslim colleagues.”

Lee was applauded for speaking out about attacks that Democratic leaders had not directly addressed—and that Jeffries was accused of amplifying recently when he said he planned to speak to Hamawy about “his past affiliations.”




“Incredibly brave stuff for Summer to explicitly name and condemn Democratic Islamophobia and do so on broad terms,” said organizer and writer Cole Sandick. “I hope more elected progressives follow her lead.”

Lee emphasized that “no marginalized person should have to deal with the abuse that they are dealing with daily from the White House on down, by themselves.”

“So I just really hope that we can be as clear about anti-Muslim hate as we are about all the other forms of hatred that we’re fighting back right now,” she added, “and recognize that our liberation is tied together.”



Adam Hamawy, Doctor Who Served in Gaza During Genocide, Wins New Jersey Primary


Hamawy called for “health care, not bombs; to abolish ICE; and to unrig this economy.”

June 5, 2026

Nurse Monica Johnston (L) listens as Adam Hamawy speaks during an interview before a meeting at the White House in Washington DC, on June 14, 2024.Drew Angerer / AFP

Adam Hamawy, a doctor who served in Gaza amid the genocide, won a New Jersey congressional primary on Tuesday, demonstrating the continued impact of the Palestine solidarity movement on U.S. politics.

Egyptian-born Hamawy beat 11 other Democrats and will be the Democratic candidate on the ballot for New Jersey’s 12th Congressional District. The winner of the Democratic primary is expected to easily win a seat in Congress in November.

Hamawy’s campaign focused on ending U.S. aggression in the Middle East and a call to abolish ICE.

“You’ve heard throughout this race that I said over and over again: health care, not bombs; to abolish ICE; and to unrig this economy,” he told supporters on Tuesday night — echoing the calls of the Palestine solidarity movement and immigrant justice advocates. Hamawy also supports ending U.S. military aid to Israel.

“They are solutions to a crisis that was born out of a broken and rigged political and economic system – a system that floods money overseas to bomb children’s schools, while at the same time says that child care here in America is pie in the sky,” he explained.

Hamawy worked as an army combat doctor during the Iraq War in 2004 and 2005. He has also participated in numerous medical missions: to Bosnia, Sudan, Haiti, Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza.

Hamawy participated in medical missions to Gaza in 2024 and 2025, which he credits as part of the reason he ran for office.

In an interview with Mondoweiss, Hamawy said, “over the last two years, I’ve been to Gaza twice and the West Bank. What I witnessed there really compelled me to get more involved. I’ve seen war before; I’ve been to Iraq. I know the horrors of war, but what I witnessed was a genocide. I saw more children and civilians blown up than ever in my life. It was so horrible that when I came back, I felt it was my obligation to go to Congress and speak about what I had seen. These are American bombs that are being dropped. These are our taxpayer dollars that are being used.”

After the medical mission, “I felt I had to go to Washington to fix this myself,” he told Al Jazeera.

The medical mission – organized by the World Health Organization and the Palestinian American Medical Association – was temporarily blocked by Israel from exiting Gaza. When other foreign medical workers were eventually evacuated from the Strip, Hamawy and two other doctors refused to leave, demanding more medical workers be let into the enclave.

In the days before the primary race, media reports smeared Hamawy as tied to Islamic extremists because of his testimony in a 1995 trial for Omar Abdel-Rahman, a New Jersey-based religious leader who was convicted of inspiring terror attacks. Hamawy has said that he knew Abdel-Rahman through the local Egyptian American community, that he opposes all forms of violence, and that smears against him are simply Islamophobia.

“There once was a time where this might have worked, when racist and anti-Muslim attacks would have turned an election,” he said upon winning the primary. “But tonight we proved that this era of American politics is over.” This was also the case with New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s race in 2025 — while the Islamophobic attacks on him in the period prior to the election would have made his win unlikely in the past, the shift is likely due to the impact of the Palestine solidarity movement since Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

The Institute for Middle East Understanding, which supported Hamawy’s race, wrote on X that “Voters were drawn to Dr. Hamawy’s candidacy because he knows firsthand the reality of Israel’s genocide in Gaza like few do – having worked to save the lives of Palestinian children under bombardment and unimaginable conditions.”

Yet while Hamawy is likely to win a seat in Congress in November and perhaps join the “Squad” of progressive lawmakers, there are serious obstacles to changing U.S. policy on Palestine from within the halls of Congress. In fact, Hamawy’s election comes as Biden-era advisors who helped engineer Israel’s genocide in Gaza are reportedly regrouping to shape the Democratic Party’s approach to Palestine ahead of the next presidential race.


‘A Strong Working-Class Agenda With Moral Clarity’: UAW Endorses Abdul El-Sayed

In what could be his most important endorsement in the tight Senate primary, Michigan’s largest and most influential union said El-Sayed was “someone we can trust to have our backs.”



Democratic Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed speaks to members of United Auto Workers (UAW) Local 600 in Dearborn, Michigan on March 9, 2026.
(Photo from Abdul El-Sayed/X)

Stephen Prager
Jun 05, 2026
COMMON DREAMS

Momentum behind Dr. Abdul El-Sayed, the progressive hopeful for Michigan’s US Senate seat, continued to build on Friday when the candidate won a major endorsement from the state’s largest and most influential labor union, the United Auto Workers.

“The UAW is proud to endorse Abdul El-Sayed for US Senate,” the union said in a post to social media. “UAW members in Michigan want a fighter in Washington, DC who isn’t afraid to push forward a strong working-class agenda with moral clarity.”



Working Families Party Goes ‘All-In’ to Support El-Sayed in Michigan



El-Sayed Announces ‘We Can Do Better’ Tour Across Michigan to Hear From Biden-to-Trump Voters

“Having never taken a dime from corporate PACs, Dr. Abdul El-Sayed is someone we can trust to have our backs,” the union continued. “From Medicare for All to banning stock buybacks, Dr. Abdul El-Sayed is ready, eager, and well-equipped to move our core issues in the US Senate.”


Despite stronger establishment backing for his opponents, Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Mich.) and state Sen. Mallory McMorrow (D-8), recent polls show El-Sayed, Detroit’s former health director, as a narrow frontrunner for the Democratic primary scheduled for early August, where the winner is expected to face the Republican former US Rep. Mike Rogers for the vacant Senate seat.

El-Sayed has won the endorsements of other unions, such as National Nurses United; progressive groups, including the Working Families Party; Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.); and several like-minded Democrats, such as Michigan’s US Rep. Rashida Tlaib; Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.); and Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison.

But the endorsement of the storied UAW, which boasts over 350,000 active and retired members in Michigan, might be his biggest yet as he seeks to transition fully from insurgent to frontrunner.

“I am so honored and humbled,” El-Sayed said on social media as he prepared to join striking UAW Local 2093 American Axle workers on the picket line in Three Rivers on Friday. “Michigan union autoworkers built the American middle class and proved that when people stand together, there’s nothing we can’t accomplish. Solidarity forever.”



Dan Merica, a reporter at The Washington Post, noted that losing the UAW endorsement to El-Sayed was a particularly big blow to Stevens, “who is running as a technocrat, often referring to herself as a ‘manufacturing geek’ because of her work as one of President Barack Obama’s top officials on the 2009 auto rescue.”

It could have major implications in a race that is not only critical for deciding the balance of power in the Senate this November, but is widely perceived as a battle for the future of the Democratic Party.

Michigan’s importance is surely not lost on Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY). The New York Times reported on Friday that despite a public stance of neutrality, he is working behind the scenes to push party donors to support Stevens, the most conservative Democrat in the three-way race. The representative for suburban Detroit recently came under scrutiny over her backing from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and the for-profit health insurance industry.

In response to what The Washington Post described as the establishment’s “concerted bid to hew to the political center,” the progressive advocacy group MoveOn said, “Once again the Democratic establishment seems to think it knows what’s best for voters [more] than voters themselves,” and congratulated El-Sayed on his endorsement.

“There’s a reason his campaign is inspiring people all over the state,” said MoveOn’s chief communications officer Joel Payne. “His economic populism resonates with Michiganders who are sick of lip service, dark money, and politicians who don’t seem to get their day-to-day struggles.”

“Those in congressional cloakrooms and in the establishment class in DC may not like it,” he continued, “but real Michiganders continue to make their support for El-Sayed’s economic populism and people-centered agenda clear.”
THE OLIGARCHS HAVE TWO PARTY'S

House GOP, With Help of 4 Dems, Votes to Take Food Aid From Millions of Women and Kids

“While working families struggle to feed their families, Republicans are cutting funding for fruit and vegetable vouchers for women, infants, and children,” said Democratic Rep. Rosa DeLauro.



House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) speaks at a press conference with other members of House Republican leadership in Washington, DC on June 3, 2026.
(Photo by Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Jake Johnson
Jun 05, 2026
COMMON DREAMS


House Republicans, with the help of four Democrats, voted Thursday to approve legislation that would slash nutrition assistance for millions of young children and pregnant and postpartum women, even as food prices continue to rise nationwide and earlier GOP cuts to federal aid take hold.

In a 213-210 vote, largely along party lines, House lawmakers passed an appropriations bill that would fund the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and other agencies for the coming fiscal year. The four Democrats who voted with most Republicans to approve the measure were Reps. Vicente Gonzalez (Texas), Adam Gray (Calif.), Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (Wash.), and Don Davis (NC).

Over 700,000 Poor Kids Across 12 States Have Lost Food Aid Under Trump-GOP Budget Law

‘Number of People Who Don’t Have Enough to Eat’ Surging Due to Trump-GOP Aid Cuts


The bill, if also passed by the Senate and signed by President Donald Trump, would cut fruit and vegetable benefits that young kids and pregnant and postpartum women receive under the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC).

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) has estimated that the cut would strip modest fruit and vegetable benefits from “nearly 5.4 million toddlers, preschoolers, and pregnant and postpartum WIC participants.” Under current law, CBPP observed, “children receive $26 monthly for fruits and vegetables, pregnant and postpartum participants receive $48, and breastfeeding participants receive $52.”

Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, said following Thursday’s vote that “while working families struggle to feed their families, Republicans are cutting funding for fruit and vegetable vouchers for women, infants, and children.”

“Working moms are already stretched thin, and Republicans are making it even harder to put dinner on the table,” said DeLauro. “The president’s tariffs have hurt American farmers, and now the Republican plan is to cut off crucial assistance that they have come to rely on even more.”

The House-passed appropriations bill would cut WIC by a total of $200 million compared to current levels, slashing $141 million in funding for fruit and vegetable benefits. The USDA’s website says that WIC “saves lives and improves the health of nutritionally at-risk women, infants, and children,” describing the program as “one of the most successful federally funded nutrition programs in the United States.”




Trump’s USDA chief, Brooke Rollins, has openly celebrated the large-scale loss of federal nutrition aid stemming from the Republican budget package that Trump signed into law last summer. That legislation included unprecedented cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), another highly effective food aid program.

The House vote to cut WIC broadly aligns with the Trump White House’s proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2027—but doesn’t go as far as the president envisioned. The National WIC Association noted that the House bill “cuts WIC’s fruit and vegetable benefits by about 10%, a first step toward an up to 75% cut sought by the White House.”

“The House proposal fails WIC families when they need help most,” said Georgia Machell, president and CEO of the National WIC Association. “It would force WIC to turn away eligible families for the first time in 30 years, breaking Congress’ 30-year bipartisan commitment to full WIC funding. For the families who receive WIC, it chips away at their ability to buy the very fruits and vegetables that federal dietary guidelines say all Americans should eat more of.”

Trump Moved to Eliminate Chemical Safety Board Before Deadly Spill Killed 11


New polling shows even 82 percent of Trump supporters want stronger federal protections from toxic pollution.

June 5, 2026

Community members hold photographs of loved ones during a vigil at R.A. Long Park following a fatal chemical storage tank failure on May 26, 2026, in Longview, Washington.Mathieu Lewis-Rolland / Getty Images


Truthout is an indispensable resource for activists, movement leaders and workers everywhere. Please make this work possible with a quick donation.

In photos taken from above, the collapsed tank at the Nippon Dynawave paper mill in Longview, Washington, looks like a crushed tin can. Capable of holding 900,000 gallons of chemicals, the massive tank was filled to 90 percent capacity when it ruptured on the morning of May 26.

Norman Barlow’s family says he worked as an electrical engineer at the Nippon mill for only three months before the collapsing tank released a wave of toxic fumes and liquid, killing Barlow and 10 other workers. The 58-year-old from Vancouver was already “trying to leave” the job due to “safety concerns” and “how the place was ran,” according to his daughter, Brooke Iverson.

“My dad was really just trying to get out of there as soon as he could,” Iverson said in an interview with KGW. Iverson said the families of the 11 victims deserve answers about how the nation’s latest chemical disaster could have been prevented.

However, the Trump administration has asked Congress to eliminate the only independent federal agency that investigates major chemical accidents while systemically rolling back environmental regulations, including rules designed to protect communities from toxic spills. New polling suggests a bipartisan majority of voters are increasingly worried about toxic chemicals and want stronger federal protection from air and water pollution, which can increase health care costs.

“Nippon’s time is coming,” Iverson said. “They’re on a clock now — a clock of answers, a clock of what happens now.”

The paper mill is a major employer in Longview, a community now in mourning. The tank contained a toxic byproduct known as “white liquor” that burns human skin on contact. The chemical killed more than 2,000 fish after spilling into local waterways and the Columbia River, but officials have said drinking water is safe. It took days for crews to clean up the toxic spill and remove the victims. State and federal investigations are ongoing, leaving neighbors and families to wait for answers.

The U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board opened an investigation and dispatched a team to Longview on May 27, one day after the incident. Congress created the independent federal watchdog in 1990 to hold polluters accountable and recommend safety improvements after major industrial accidents, which are alarmingly common in the United States.

In addition to investigating seven other industrial accidents, the Chemical Safety Board is currently investigating a toxic gas leak on April 22 that killed two workers and injured 19 at a troubled refinery in West Virginia’s Kanawha Valley, an area with a long history of industrial fires, explosions, and chemical spills. The board is also examining an explosion at a Pennsylvania steel plant that killed two workers and injured more than a dozen in August 2025.

President Donald Trump’s proposed 2027 federal budget would eliminate the Chemical Safety Board.

However, President Donald Trump’s proposed 2027 federal budget would eliminate the Chemical Safety Board as part of an apparent effort to rid the federal government of civil servants who might resist the president’s ever-shifting political whims. Echoing lobbyists for polluting industries, the White House claims the safety board “duplicates” work done by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), producing “unprompted studies” and proposing “regulations” it has no authority to enforce.

Unlike the EPA, the Chemical Safety Board operates independently from the president’s cabinet and political appointees. With an annual budget of about $14 million, the board cannot enforce regulations, but its investigations into fires, spills, explosions, and other accidents result in recommendations for regulators and private companies to make chemical storage and processing safer for workers and surrounding communities.

Congress rejected the White House’s original proposal to shut down the U.S. Chemical Safety Board by October 2025, but House Republicans are now pushing a budget bill that would cut the watchdog’s funding by 40 percent.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration has also taken a sledgehammer to the EPA by firing staff, slashing budgets, and undermining independent scientists studying the effects of toxic pollution on public health. Under EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, the agency is systematically weakening federal environmental protections, including rules finalized in 2024 that require industrial polluters to coordinate with local first responders and create risk-management plans for handling dangerous chemicals near residential areas. For example, the EPA is moving to scrap a rule that would have required industrial facilities to use safer (but potentially more expensive) chemicals and technology in some cases.

Ana Parras, executive director of Texas Environmental Justice Advocacy Services, called the EPA’s proposed changes “a direct assault on safety and a political gift to polluters,” in a statement on February 19. “For fenceline communities and facility workers, this rollback is a declaration that our lives are deemed acceptable sacrifices,” Parras added.

A nationwide poll of 2,025 registered voters released on June 3 suggests Trump’s deregulatory agenda is not meeting the expectations of voters after the president promised to deliver the “cleanest air and water on Earth” during his 2024 campaign.


By an 8 to 1 margin, voters across the political spectrum said the EPA should prioritize protecting public health from toxic pollution over reducing regulations — even if it means higher costs.

By an 8 to 1 margin, voters across the political spectrum said the EPA should prioritize protecting public health from toxic pollution over reducing regulations — even if it means higher costs. The cost of health care remains a top concern, and 81 percent said the rollback of EPA regulations is shifting the burden of pollution “onto families through medical bills and long-term health consequences.”

“They aren’t buying the idea that rolling back protections makes life more affordable … pollution prevention is part of protecting families from costs they cannot afford,” said John Ray, senior director at YouGov, which conducted the poll, in a call with reporters on June 3.

Based in Washington, Peter Murchie worked at the EPA for 25 years before becoming the senior director of policy at the Environmental Protection Network, which commissioned the new poll. Murchie said both the Chemical Safety Board and EPA play important roles in preventing and responding to chemical disasters, including the deadly “white liquor” spill in Longview.

“EPA has a very important role both in the prevention of accidents like this one and of chemical exposure to workers and the community, and also the response, and you have seen in the reporting that the EPA is on scene with the emergency response folks,” Murchie told reporters on the press call.

The new poll shows that 82 percent of Trump’s notoriously loyal supporters say the president should be tougher on polluters, and 42 percent view Trump’s handling of the EPA less favorably than his overall job performance. Support for strengthening the EPA among all voters has risen from 50 percent in 2024 to 64 percent when the poll was conducted in late April, a few weeks before the deadly spill in Longview. Yet Trump and Zeldin are moving in the exact opposite direction in order to reduce costs and maximize profits for private industry.

“There’s this belief that the left wants more regulations and the right wants less,” Ray said. “But for most people, there is broad-based concern about making sure the government is doing whatever it is supposed to be doing to keep water clean and air clean and food clean and so on.”

Do You Know What’s in the Air Your Children Breathe?


Nearly half of kids in the US are breathing unhealthy air; it’s time for the EPA to return to its lifesaving mission of protecting their lungs.


An oil refinery, owned by Exxon Mobil, is the second largest in the country on 28th February 2020 in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States.
(Photo by Barry Lewis/InPictures via Getty Images)


Christy Sadreameli
Jun 05, 2026
Common Dreams


Parents have a lot on their minds. I am a mom of a 3-year-old and a 7-year old and a pediatric pulmonologist. Like many other parents, I am constantly juggling the logistics of family life, school, and work. Keeping my children healthy and safe is a priority.

Food is one example. I try to ensure my children eat healthy, nutritious food that won’t make them sick or contribute to the formation of chronic disease, like some ultra-processed foods can. As the parent of a picky eater, finding healthy foods my children will actually eat can be challenging.

I know that parents do not need another thing to be concerned about. They certainly shouldn’t have to worry about the air their children breathe. But the American Lung Association’s recent “State of the Air” report found that nearly half of kids in the US are breathing unhealthy air. More specifically, the report found that 33.5 million children, or 46% of people under 18 years old in the US, live in an area that received a failing grade for at least one measure of air pollution. More than 7 million children in the United States (10% of all kids) live in a community with failing grades for all three measures studied in the report.

This is unacceptable, especially because studies show that infants, children, and teens as a group are more susceptible to the health impacts of air pollution, and that some of these harms can be lifelong. Compared with adults, infants and children breathe more air relative to their body size and they are frequently playing outside where they are exposed to outdoor air. The fact that the lungs continue to develop throughout childhood plays a role.

Children should not have to pay the price with their health so that polluting industries can maximize their profits.

In the past year, there has been an increasing amount of attention paid to preventing chronic disease in children—for good reason. We all want to set our children up for the healthiest lives possible. But the conversation about chronic disease prevention must include cleaning up air pollution. Air pollution exposure in childhood can cause long-term harm by impeding lung growth, contributing to new asthma cases, causing flareups in people with asthma and other lung conditions, increasing risk of respiratory infections and more.

Air pollution can even harm children before they are born. Air pollution is linked to preterm birth, low birth weight, lower lung capacity, and other adverse birth outcomes. That means that exposure to air pollution during pregnancy and childhood could even set a child up for a lifetime of poor lung health. As children grow into adulthood, breathing air pollution can cause respiratory and cardiovascular harm, asthma attacks, lung cancer, heart attacks, stroke, even early death.

So what is driving the ground-level ozone pollution and particle pollution reported on in “State of the Air?” There are many sources, but the main ones include diesel- and gasoline-powered vehicles, power plants and other industrial sources, emissions from the oil and gas industry, and wildfires. Higher temperatures can exacerbate this, as heat accelerates the production of ozone. While the US has made incredible progress in cleaning up air pollution over the past 50 years, the changing climate is making air pollution more likely to form and more difficult to clean up.

Here is more bad news: While half of the children in the US are breathing unhealthy air, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is working to roll back and repeal safeguards designed to reduce air pollution. In recent months, EPA announced a rule to weaken limits to protect children from mercury and other toxic pollutants from power plants, eliminated the standards to regulate emissions from vehicles, and delayed implementation of a rule to reduce pollution from oil and gas wells. On top of that, EPA recently decided to eliminate health-related data from its analyses of clean air measures, meaning that the costs of pollution to our kids, families, and communities will not be counted as policies are rolled back.

This is particularly upsetting, as I see what an impact air pollution can have on children and families in my day-to-day work as a pediatric pulmonologist. For decades, EPA has calculated the costs of air pollution to the health and livelihood of people, including asthma attacks and premature deaths. EPA is still including the cost to industry in their economic analyses, which means it will be easier to achieve further rollbacks of regulations while omitting the devastating costs to children and communities. Children should not have to pay the price with their health so that polluting industries can maximize their profits.

The good news is that federal clean air protections work when they are enforced. The Clean Air Act is regarded as one of the most successful public health laws in US history. For 55 years, it has protected children, families, and communities from harmful pollution and driven innovation toward a cleaner, healthier future. The Clean Air Act gives EPA the authority and responsibility to assess and clean up air pollution from vehicles, power plants, and industries across the nation. We rely on EPA to protect our lungs. I urge EPA to return to its lifesaving mission of protecting human health by reducing deadly air pollution instead of allowing more of it, and value people’s lives and the health costs of pollution in their rulemaking processes.

As I read the labels on foods, buckle my sons into their car seats, and put their helmets on before they jump onto scooters and bikes, I also check the air quality on my phone. I teach my patients and their parents to do the same. But there is only so much I—or any parent—can do to protect my kids from air pollution.

EPA must protect our air and value our kids’ health. All lungs, especially little lungs, are counting on it.


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.


Christy Sadreameli
Dr. S. Christy Sadreameli is a pediatric pulmonologist at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland, where she takes care of pediatric patients of all ages with a variety of pulmonary conditions. She is also a volunteer medical spokesperson for the American Lung Association to help communicate important health information to parents all over the country.
Full Bio >


TU Graz physicist presents mobile device for high-precision measurement of air pollutants



The UV dual-comb spectrometer detects harmful gases with unrivalled accuracy and sensitivity. The compact design allows mobile use for monitoring air quality with a range of several kilometers



Graz University of Technology

Optical configuration of the spectrometer 

image: 

The optical configuration of the UV dualcomb spectrometer.

view more 

Credit: Oliver WOlf - TU Graz





Birgitta Schultze-Bernhardt and her team at the Institute of Experimental Physics at Graz University of Technology (TU Graz) have developed a new type of UV dual-comb spectrometer that detects gaseous air pollutants with unrivalled accuracy and sensitivity. Using ultraviolet double laser light, the device measures the concentration of harmful gases such as formaldehyde within half a second. Thanks to its compact design and a measuring range of up to two and a half kilometres, the spectrometer is not only suitable for laboratory analyses, but also for mobile measurements in cities, industrial areas and agricultural regions.

Fingerprint of pollutants

As a starting point for its measurement, the device generates two laser pulses in the ultraviolet spectral range within fractions of a second. When this UV light hits gas molecules, it excites them electronically and causes them to rotate and vibrate – physicists refer to this as rovibronic transitions. These transitions are different for every gaseous substance and swallow up part of the laser light in a unique way. “Every air pollutant therefore has its own fingerprint, which our UV dual-comb spectrometer recognises,” says Birgitta Schultze-Bernhardt.

Schultze-Bernhardt and her team developed the first version of their spectrometer a good two years ago. At the time, it was the first of its kind in the world, but large laboratory set-ups were necessary for the measurements. The new version has been shrunk to the size of a cardboard removal box. One reason for this is that one laser source instead of two now generates the double laser pulse. “This also allows us to dispense with the complex electronic stabilisation of the system,” explains Birgitta Schultze-Bernhardt.

Resolution of 1 GHz

The new spectrometer can detect the frequencies of UV light with a resolution of 1 GHz and thus significantly outperforms all conventional UV spectrometers. This enabled the researchers to gain new, fundamental insights into the UV light absorption of the air pollutant formaldehyde: “We measured absorption patterns of formaldehyde that had never been observed experimentally before, as the resolution of any previous devices was too imprecise,” says Birgitta Schultze-Bernhardt.

57-year-old rotational constants corrected

The measurements in Graz have shown that the rotational constants of formaldehyde, which have been available in physics databases and textbooks since the 1960s, are incorrect. “In collaboration with the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics in the USA, we have corrected the values of this fundamental, molecule-specific parameter by up to 15 per cent,” says Birgitta Schultze-Bernhardt. Collaboration with Rolf Breinbauer from the Institute of Organic Chemistry at TU Graz, who produced high-purity formaldehyde for the investigations in a two-stage process, also contributed to this progress in basic research.

Practical application in environmental protection

Beyond basic research, the spectrometer has the potential to make the measurement of air pollutants and gas leaks in cities and industrial areas much more precise and easier. “In principle, our device can accurately detect any semi-transparent, gaseous substance. And we are currently working on determining the concentration of several pollutants with a single measurement,” says Birgitta Schultze-Bernhardt. Funded by a Proof of Concept Grant from the European Research Council, the experimental physicist is also currently developing a UV spectrometer that can also be used by laypersons to monitor air quality, for example in companies or environmental authorities.

Funded by the Austrian Science Fund, ERC and NAWI Graz

The development of the UV dual-comb spectrometer is based on research projects led by Birgitta Schultz-Bernhardt, which were funded by the Austrian Science Fund FWF and the European Research Council. The NAWI Graz cooperation initiative financed the novel laser source of the current spectrometer as part of its infrastructure funding.