Wednesday, April 08, 2026


‘Torture and Degrading Treatment’ – The Case of Dr. Abu Safiya and Gaza’s Broken Medical System



by  | Apr 8, 2026 | 

“Israel must immediately release Gazan doctor Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya,” UN experts said in a recent statement, in unequivocal terms.

Dr. Abu Safiya was “subjected to torture and other cruel and degrading treatment,” they said. His health condition is “dire.”

Many are already familiar with the iconic Palestinian doctor from Gaza. But the deserved and urgent focus on his case should not end with him. Rather, it should illuminate the broader catastrophe afflicting Gaza’s health sector – one deliberately dismantled as part of the ongoing genocide that began on October 7, 2023.

Palestinians and others continue to refer to the genocide as ‘ongoing’. This is not hyperbole. Though the rate of killing by bombs has decreased, the genocide remains in effect because the destruction of Gaza, and of all civilian infrastructure necessary for survival, continues to produce the same outcome: Palestinians are still dying as a direct result of the same policies.

This has affected every aspect of Palestinian life in Gaza that guarantees survival – from water and food to medical care.

Speaking at a WHO press briefing in Cairo on October 8, 2025, Dr. Hanan Balkhy, the World Health Organization’s top regional health official for the Eastern Mediterranean, laid it all on the table.

Though she spoke in institutional terms, outlining Gaza’s urgent healthcare needs, her account confirmed the scale of devastation caused by Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

Over 1,700 health workers have been killed in Gaza since the start of the genocide, she said. The majority of Gaza’s hospitals have been destroyed or rendered non-functional, with only a few partially operating. At least 455 Palestinians have died due to hunger, including 151 children, within months.

In all of the grim numbers the Gaza genocide has produced – and continues to produce – one constant stands out: for every growing number of victims, there is a corresponding number of those meant to save them who have also been killed.

Thousands of doctors, health workers, humanitarian workers, civil defense personnel, emergency responders, volunteers, charity workers, and municipal officials have been swept into the same cycle of destruction.

It could be argued that these numbers correspond to the overall scale of death in Gaza. Official figures state that over 72,000 Palestinians have been killed and more than 172,000 wounded, while independent research, including estimates published in The Lancet, suggests the true death toll may be far higher.

This argument may appear defensible. But the targeting of hospitals, the killing and wounding of doctors, and the unlawful detention and torture of health workers cannot be dismissed as a mere reflection of mass killing.

From the earliest days of the genocide, Israel placed Gaza’s hospitals at the center of its assault. On October 17, 2023, Al-Ahli Arab Hospital in Gaza was struck in one of the most horrific early massacres, followed by systematic assaults on major medical facilities, including Al-Shifa Hospital, Al-Quds Hospital, the Indonesian Hospital, and Nasser Medical Complex.

But why hospitals? Because hospitals were not only places of treatment. They were places of refuge. As tens of thousands of Palestinians sought shelter within their walls, hospitals became the last spaces where survival was still possible. To destroy them was to sever that final lifeline.

The killing of doctors, the bombing of hospitals, and the detention of medical personnel were not incidental. They formed part of a broader strategy: to render Gaza uninhabitable by dismantling the systems that sustain life.

Deprived of care, stripped of infrastructure, and denied the means to survive, Palestinians were left with fewer options – first to flee south, and ultimately, to be pushed beyond Gaza altogether.

This is why Dr. Abu Safiya has become so vital to this story.

Every Gazan doctor who refused to leave his or her post during the genocide is a hero. Every health worker who risked his or her life to save others represents a model of courage that should be emulated everywhere. And every doctor killed, wounded, or detained deserves to be remembered as the highest expression of human commitment to life.

Dr. Abu Safiya embodies all of them.

He is not unique – and that is precisely the point. He is the collective face of a medical community that refused to abandon its people, even as the system around it collapsed.

At Kamal Adwan Hospital in northern Gaza, Abu Safiya remained at his post as Israeli forces advanced on the facility, already overwhelmed by waves of wounded and displaced civilians. Despite shortages of fuel, medicine, and staff, he continued to treat patients while helping to protect those sheltering inside the hospital compound.

In the final days before his detention on December 27, 2024, he was among the last senior doctors still operating in the hospital, overseeing care under conditions that defy any conventional understanding of medical practice.

One image came to define him.

Standing amid the ruins outside Kamal Adwan Hospital, surrounded by destruction, he walked alone in his white coat toward advancing Israeli armored vehicles – a lone doctor facing a war machine. The image circulated widely because it captured, in a single frame, the reality of Gaza: those who heal standing unarmed before those who destroy.

That destruction remains in effect today, even as global attention has shifted elsewhere, compounding the danger facing a besieged Gaza. “Israel must release Dr. Abu Safiya and all healthcare workers,” said UN experts. Israel should also release all Palestinian prisoners, lift the siege, and end the genocide in its entirety.

“States have the power to end his torment,” they said. They are not wrong – and there can be no moral or legal justification for their inaction.

Dr. Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and the Editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He is the author of six books. His forthcoming book, ‘Before the Flood,’ will be published by Seven Stories Press. His other books include ‘Our Vision for Liberation’, ‘My Father was a Freedom Fighter’ and ‘The Last Earth’. Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA). His website is www.ramzybaroud.net
Are war crimes being committed in the Middle East war?


With US and Israeli strikes on Iran's critical infrastructure already underway Tuesday amid threats of more to come, the UN and other organisations have warned that such attacks could constitute war crimes.



Issued on: 07/04/2026 
By: FRANCE 24

A bridge struck by U.S. airstrikes on Thursday is seen in the town of Karaj, west of Tehran, Iran, Friday, April 3, 2026. © Vahid Salemi, AP

A war crime is a serious violation of international humanitarian law during times of conflict.

But "not all violations committed during war are legally considered war crimes," the Geneva-based NGO Trial International explains on its website, stressing that "to qualify, they must fulfil certain criteria of purpose and gravity".

War crimes are primarily defined by the 1949 Geneva Conventions and their additional protocols, as well as by the 1998 Rome Statute, the founding treaty of the world's only permanent court for prosecuting war crimes – the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Article 8 of the Rome Statute sets out dozens of examples which could be considered a war crime.

They include wilful killing, torture, taking hostages and intentionally attacking civilians.

Also on the list are intentional "attacks against civilian objects, that is, objects which are not military objectives".

Article 54 of the first additional protocol of the Geneva Conventions meanwhile emphasises that it is "prohibited to attack, destroy, remove, or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population", including "crops, livestock, drinking water installations and supplies and irrigation works".

Situation in Middle East?

Civilian infrastructure, including power and desalination plants, have been repeatedly hit in the conflict that began when the United States and Israel launched strikes on Iran on February 28.

Trump ramped up his rhetoric towards Iran on Monday, vowing to carry out the "complete demolition" of Iran's critical infrastructure, particularly bridges and power plants if a deal was not reached by late Tuesday.

But hours before the deadline, Israel said it had already completed a broad wave of strikes targeting "infrastructure sites" across Iran.

Writing on Truth Social, Trump stated that "a whole civilisation will die tonight" if the country does not heed his call for a deal.

Without mentioning Trump by name, United Nations rights chief Volker Turk on Tuesday slammed the "incendiary rhetoric" expressed during the war as "sickening".

"Under international law, deliberately attacking civilians and civilian infrastructure is a war crime," Turk said, insisting that "anyone responsible for international crimes must be held to account by a competent court."

Stephane Dujarric, spokesman for UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, also stressed that "civilian infrastructure, including energy infrastructure, may not be attacked".

Even in cases where "specific civilian infrastructure were to qualify as a military objective, international humanitarian law would still prohibit attacks against them if they (were) expected to cause excessive incidental civilian harm," he warned.

Mirjana Spoljaric, head of the International Committee of the Red Cross, denounced on Monday "deliberate threats, whether in rhetoric or in action, against essential civilian infrastructure".

Who prosecutes war crimes?

Trial International points out that "unlike other human rights violations, war crimes do not engage state responsibility but individual criminal responsibility".

Domestic courts are typically responsible for prosecuting war crimes. However, this can prove impossible during or in the aftermath of conflicts.

In such cases, one option can be universal jurisdiction, which allows countries to prosecute the most serious international crimes regardless of where they were committed.

International courts may also have jurisdiction, including the ICC.

Cases can be referred to the ICC by a country that has signed up to the Rome treaty or whose citizens have been the victims of crimes.

Cases may also be referred by the UN Security Council. A non-member state can also agree to accept the court's jurisdiction.

Neither the United States, Israel nor Iran are state parties to the Rome Statute.

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)
French arms exports to Israel ‘a continuous pipeline of military hardware’

ANALYSIS


Throughout the war in Gaza, France maintained that its exports of military equipment to Israel were solely for defensive purposes or intended for re-export to other countries. A new report by two pro-Palestinian groups argues that French firms and transport hubs have continued to arm Israel’s military operations “through supply chains that have bypassed public scrutiny”.


Issued on: 08/04/2026 - 
FRANCE24
By: Benjamin DODMAN


French electronics firm Sermat has been ordered to halt exports of components used for Israeli drones such as the Hermes 900, built by Elbit Systems. © Jack Guez, AFP

In October last year, French customs agents paid a surprise visit to the headquarters of Sermat, an electronics firm based on the edge of Paris. Its purpose was to investigate the company’s dealings with Israeli defence contractor Elbit Systems, the country’s leading arms manufacturer.

A day earlier, customs at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport, France’s main hub, had blocked an Israeli-bound shipment of Sermat’s alternators – electric generators used by Elbit Systems to equip drones that have been widely deployed by the Israeli army in Gaza.

The rare move came just days after investigative website Disclose revealed that Sermat had also supplied Elbit Systems with electric motors fitted onto Israeli drones – including the Hermes 450 unmanned aircraft that was involved in the fatal killing of humanitarian workers for the NGO World Central Kitchen in April 2024.

Following those revelations, the French government moved swiftly – and discreetly – to ban all exports of Sermat products to Israel. The ban, Disclose wrote at the time, amounted to an admission that “there is a real risk of exported components being used in the bombardments” that have now killed more than 72,000 people in the war-ravaged Gaza Strip, according to health officials.
‘Defensive systems’

Since the early months of the Gaza War, France has repeatedly stated that it does not export lethal military equipment liable to be used in the Palestinian territory – a stance recently reiterated by Catherine Vautrin, the French minister for the armed forces and veterans.

In a social media post on April 4, Vautrin stressed that French military exports to Israel were limited to components for “defensive systems designed to protect civilians”, such as Israel’s Iron Dome, or authorised shipments intended for weapons to be assembled in Israel and then exported to other countries.

But critics argue that the line between defensive and offensive uses is often blurry, and that French authorities have no control over the components once they have been sold. In Sermat’s case, Disclose pointed to loopholes in export rules, noting that the company’s contracts with Elbit Systems originally involved the equipment of unarmed surveillance drones – and was therefore exempt from the “dual-use” classification that involves more stringent controls.

© France 24
01:55


Sermat is among more than a dozen French firms cited in a report published on Tuesday by pro-Palestinian advocacy groups Urgence Palestine and People’s Embargo for Palestine. Titled “Exposing French military shipments to Israel”, the 66-page report details the steady flow of French-made equipment that has continued to supply Israel’s military industry throughout the Gaza War.

Compiled from open-source export data, it charts “more than 525 shipments of military goods (that) have been shipped from French manufacturers to Israeli defence and aerospace industries” between October 2023 and March 2026.

Goods include “actuators, optical components, and batteries for avionics and ground systems; ammunition links for rifles and machine guns; as well as sensors for armored vehicles and forgings for artillery systems”. Though none of the components constitute lethal weapons that are ready for use, the report says they “represent a continuous pipeline of military hardware to Israel, directly facilitating the technical infrastructure of its assaults”.

Contacted by FRANCE 24, the French finance ministry did not wish to comment on the report, while the defence ministry referred to Vautrin’s social media post. The French government has taken steps to dissolve Urgence Palestine for “inciting hatred”, in a move criticised by several human rights experts appointed by the UN.


‘Bypassing public scrutiny’

The report by Urgence Palestine and People’s Embargo for Palestine also details the important role played by French airports and seaports as transport hubs for military shipments to Israel, notably from the US. It states that the FedEx hub at Roissy-Charles de Gaulle handled 117 shipments carrying Lockheed Martin components that are crucial to the maintenance and repair of Israel’s fleet of F-35 jets.

“As a signatory to the Geneva Conventions, the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), and the Genocide Convention, France is legally and morally bound to ensure that its industrial and state exports do not facilitate serious violations of international law,” the report concludes, adding that the evidence suggests “these obligations have been breached through supply chains that have bypassed public scrutiny”.

As early as January 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) warned of the “risk” of genocide being committed against the Palestinian people. Last September, a UN human rights commission concluded that the risk had become reality, adding that the international community was under the “legal obligation to use all means that are reasonably available to them to stop the genocide in Gaza”.

Some European countries have heeded such calls, with Spain and Belgium notably enacting arms embargos on Israel. The Spanish government has also banned the use of its ports and airports for exports of weapons, dual-use technology and military equipment to Israel.

Docker protests

Elsewhere, most notably in Italy, dock workers have taken matters into their own hands, sometimes refusing to load military equipment onto ships bound for Israel.

© France 24
02:18


In June last year, mirroring earlier protests in Genoa, Salerno and Ravenna, dockers in the French port of Fos-sur-Mer refused to load crates of links used in machine guns aboard a cargo vessel bound for the Israeli port of Haifa. It came days after another investigation by Disclose revealed that the port near Marseille was a key link in the secretive export of spare parts for machine guns.

The links manufactured by local company Eurolinks are small metal pieces used to connect machine gun bullets and allowing rapid bursts of fire. Rights groups say they have likely been used against civilians in the Gaza Strip, including in the February 24, 2024 “Flour Massacre” in which hundreds of Palestinians were killed or injured as they sought food from aid trucks.

Sébastien Lecornu, then France’s defence minister and the current prime minister, stated at the time that the export licence granted to Eurolinks “relates solely to re-export” and “does not entitle the Israeli army to use these components”. He did not elaborate on whether and how the French authorities sought to enforce the terms of the licence in Israel.

French arms manufacturers contacted by Disclose and Le Monde have offered similar answers, suggesting it was up to their Israeli clients to abide by French export rules.

Defence ties between the two countries have cooled sharply since the start of the Gaza War, with Paris taking an increasingly critical line toward Israel and at one point banning Israeli firms from a major arms fair.

According to a parliamentary report published last year, France authorised more than 200 dual-use export licences to Israel in 2024 worth €76.5 million – a 60% decrease from the previous year. Those figures look set for an even sharper drop next year – though not at France’s initiative.

The Israeli defence ministry announced last week it would stop all defence procurement from France, accusing Paris of a hostile stance. The ministry said it would instead rely on the local defence industry and suppliers in “friendly” countries.

Analysts, however, suggest the announcement had more to do with heated rhetoric than a substantial policy shift, noting that existing contracts are expected to be honoured and that private companies may still pursue deals.

Serbia Poised To Produce Drones With Israeli Arms Giant Involved In Gaza – Analysis

Hermes 900, an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) designed for tactical missions that Elbit sold to Serbia, displayed at a military parade in Belgrade on October 20, 2025.

 Photo: BIRN/Sasa Dragojlo


April 8, 2026 
 Balkan Insight
By Sasa Dragojlo and Avi Scharf

In early March, Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic announced the imminent opening of a drone factory. “For serious drones,” he said. “The most serious in the world.”

Vucic said the factory would be a joint venture between two partners and might be ready in April, but he didn’t specify with whom Serbia was partnering. The answer might prove unsavoury for some.

BIRN and Haaretz can reveal that the factory will be co-owned by top Israeli Elbit Systems and Serbia’s main state-owned import-export company, SDPR – with the Israeli partner having a majority state of 51 per cent.


In a June 2025 report, United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories Francesca Albanese named Elbit Systems among a number of companies profiting from “the ongoing genocide” in Gaza, where more than 70,000 Palestinians have died in Israeli military operations since the October 2023 attack on Israel by the militant group Hamas.

According to official documents obtained by BIRN/Haaretz and two independent sources, Elbit and SDPR plan to produce two types of drones for short- and long-range missions.

The partnership arguably takes defence ties between the two countries to a new level; the value of Serbian arms exports to Israel has already skyrocketed 42-fold since 2023, reaching 114 million euros last year. Most of those exports were carried out by SDPR.

Serbia stands to benefit financially from the drone joint venture and from the transfer of technology and knowledge from one of the most advanced arms companies in the world, said Vuk Vuksanovic, foreign policy lecturer in the Department of War Studies at King’s College London. Israel, on the other hand, is keen to secure a military supply chain outside its immediate region, “which is constantly in a conflict zone”, he told BIRN.

On a geopolitical level, Vuksanovic said Serbia’s ruling elite has come to see Israel as a “shortcut to the White House”, at a time of growing popular dissatisfaction with Vucic and the ruling Progressive Party after 14 years in power.

“The Serbian ruling party’s main priority now is staying in power and in order to achieve that it is best not to anger the Americans, especially in the context of recent Trump moves in the global arena,” he said.

SDPR did not respond to questions from BIRN, while Elbit Systems only replied: “No comment.”

‘Omnipresent killing machines’


The plan for the project, according to documents reviewed by BIRN and corroborated by two independent sources close to the Serbian arms industry, is to produce two types of drones – a rotary-wing model capable of carrying heavy payloads of ammunition on short-range missions and a more sophisticated, long-range drone capable of flying at altitudes of up to 6,000 metres.

One source said the long-range drone is “more advanced” than the Serbian-produced Pegasus. “It has a higher flight altitude and greater operational autonomy,” the source told BIRN on condition of anonymity. “That’s the essence, because we can’t achieve that ourselves.”

“The general idea is the transfer of technology, because Serbian engineers will be working on it as well, and that drone is the crown of the whole story.”

According to one source, engineers from the Serbian aircraft company UTVA, owned by SDPR, will be also involved in the project.

Albanese’s report, From Economy of Occupation to Economy of Genocide, mentions drones developed and supplied by Elbit Systems and another Israeli company as flying alongside the Israeli fighter jets that have been bombing Gaza. The drones, she wrote, provide surveillance of Palestinians and intelligence on targets.

With the support of these companies and collaboration with institutions such as the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT, wrote Albanese, “drones used by Israel acquired automated weapons systems and the ability to fly in swarm formation”.

“Drones, hexacopters and quadcopters have also been omnipresent killing machines in the skies of Gaza,” she declared.

Albanese identified Elbit System as among those companies that “contribute to producing the tools for surveillance, crowd control, urban warfare, facial recognition and targeted killing, tools that are effectively tested on Palestinians”.

Israel has dismissed allegations of genocide.

The documents obtained by BIRN reveal it was initially planned for the drone factory to be potentially located in the industrial zone of Simanovci, about 30 kilometres west of the capital, Belgrade, in a facility owned by the Pink Media group, the company of pro-government Serbian media tycoon Zeljko Mitrovic.

However, following publication of the article, Pink Media Group denied that the factory will be located there. “This information is completely false. Neither Zeljko Mitrovic nor Pink Media Group have anything to do with this project. He hasn’t participated, nor is he participating in any talks, negotiations, deals or arrangements related to this drone factory,” the company stated, adding that no company linked to Mitrovic also had any role in the project.

Reputational risk

According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, SIPRI, which tracks the global trade in arms, Elbit Systems is Israel’s No. 1 defence contractor, operating in fields including aerospace, land and naval command and control, communications, and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance systems.

In March, The Jerusalem Post reported that Elbit Systems is now the biggest Israeli firm by market value listed on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. It has a string of major contracts with the Israeli state and has already done business with Serbia.

Early last year, Elbit Systems sold Serbia advanced artillery systems and drones worth $335 million. In August, another deal valued at $1.6 billion was signed for the delivery of drones, long-range missiles, electronic warfare systems, and other military equipment to Belgrade. The same month, BIRN reported that the Belgrade-based company Edepro – which describes itself as a “regional leader in propulsion system solutions” for rockets, drones, and missiles – had exported goods to IMI Systems, which is owned by Elbit Systems since 2018.

Its role in Gaza has given other state pause. Citing an official document, Agence France-Presse, AFP, reported in September last year that Spain had cancelled a contract worth some 700 million euros for the purchase of Elbit’s multiple rocket launcher system after the government announced a ban on military equipment sales or purchases with Israel over its Gaza offensive.

Last month, a group calling itself The Earthquake Faction claimed responsibility for a fire at a factory belonging to Czech LPP Holding, which has announced in 2023 that it would partner with Elbit in developing drones. The group said its aim was to disrupt Israeli operations in Gaza.

Such setbacks have not stopped Elbit Systems from posting revenues last year of $7.9 billion, 16.3 per cent up on 2024, boosted further by the US-Israeli attack on Iran.

Visiting in Serbia in March, Albanese described the Balkan country as “one of Israel’s strongest and most determined allies, without any shame”. In response, Serbia’s foreign ministry called her remarks “inappropriate”.
Issues even before Gaza war

In 2009, Norway’s government announced it had excluded Elbit Systems from investment by Government Pension Fund based on a recommendation by the Fund’s Council on Ethics over Elbit’s supplying of surveillance systems for a separation barrier in the West Bank. “We do not wish to fund companies that so directly contribute to violations of international humanitarian law,” said Kristin Halvorsen, Norway’s then finance minister.

In January 2010, Danske Bank added Elbit to a list of companies that it said failed its Socially Responsible Investment policy; two months later, a Swedish pension fund also boycotted the firm for its involvement in the construction of the West Bank barrier, which a 2004 advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice said contravened international law.

In 2014, one of Denmark’s largest pension fund administrators, PKA Ltd, announced it would no longer consider investing in Elbit, citing the same reasons.

And in 2018, British bank HSBC divested from Elbit following the Israeli firm’s acquisition of IMI Systems. HSBC cited IMI’s production of cluster bombs.


Balkan Insight

The Balkan Insight (formerly the Balkin Investigative Reporting Network, BIRN) is a close group of editors and trainers that enables journalists in the region to produce in-depth analytical and investigative journalism on complex political, economic and social themes. BIRN emerged from the Balkan programme of the Institute for War & Peace Reporting, IWPR, in 2005. The original IWPR Balkans team was mandated to localise that programme and make it sustainable, in light of changing realities in the region and the maturity of the IWPR intervention. Since then, its work in publishing, media training and public debate activities has become synonymous with quality, reliability and impartiality. A fully-independent and local network, it is now developing as an efficient and self-sustainable regional institution to enhance the capacity for journalism that pushes for public debate on European-oriented political and economic reform.

'Speaking helps us heal' says Rwandan survivor on genocide anniversary

Rwanda on Tuesday began its annual commemoration of the 1994 genocide against the Tutsis – a period of remembrance for the victims and reflection on the legacy of the killings. For survivor Godelieve Mukasarasi, that past has shaped more than three decades of work helping women who were raped during the genocide, and children born of sexual violence, to rebuild their lives.


Issued on: 07/04/2026 - RFI

Portraits of children displayed as part of a Red Cross tracing campaign launched after the 1994 genocide in Rwanda, which sought to reunite families separated by the violence. AFP - FABRICE COFFRINI

More than 800,000 people, mainly ethnic Tutsis, were killed in about 100 days after the assassination of president Juvénal Habyarimana on 6 April 1994, which followed years of ethnic tension. The genocide has left deep scars across Rwanda, destroying families, communities and social bonds.

Sexual violence was used on a vast scale, leaving many women traumatised and many children born of rape facing stigma and rejection. Around 70 percent of the population was born after the genocide, but its impact is still felt in families, in collective memory and through national commemorations.

Mukasarasi is a Hutu woman whose Tutsi husband and one of her children were killed during the genocide, which also targeted moderate Hutus amid long-standing ethnic divisions. She was also raped. In the years since, Mukasarasi founded the non-profit Sevota, which has supported more than 1,000 women and children.

In a new book, La Réparatrice, co-written with French journalist Capucine Graby, Mukasarasi shares her story and describes her work. Mukasarasi tells RFI that recovery is not only about justice, but also about restoring dignity and memory.

RFI: Why did you choose the title La Réparatrice (The Repairer) for your book?

Godelieve Mukasarasi: Because it reflects the role I gave myself after the genocide. There were shattered lives, destroyed social bonds and invisible wounds among survivors.

I do not see myself only as a victim, but as someone who helps rebuild dignity and Rwanda’s collective memory. I committed myself to preserving the memory of the genocide by giving survivors a voice and refusing to let it be forgotten.

For me, the title symbolises my role in reconciliation and in justice that helps repair. It is also about repairing what cannot be seen. The book focuses on psychological and social wounds that are invisible but need just as much care as physical injuries.

The word “repairer” goes beyond Rwanda. It speaks to women’s resilience in the face of war violence around the world. It raises the question of whether societies can recover from collective trauma. It embodies the idea that repair is not only judicial, but also human, social and spiritual – for women, for children, for the fabric of communities and for the memory shattered by genocide.

RFI: Through Sevota you have supported more than 1,000 women who were raped, and children born of rape. Is speaking out central to the rebuilding process for you?

GM: Survivors were silenced by shame, fear or stigma. Giving them a space where they can speak freely, be heard and be recognised is already a form of healing. Speech becomes a tool of liberation. Expressing what they went through helps them regain control of their own story. It is also an act of memory and transmission.

What we do is both therapeutic and political. We give a voice back to those who were silenced and ensure their stories become part of a collective memory that refuses erasure. In our spaces, other forms of expression also help, such as prayer, songs, poetry and theatre. Working on trauma through the body can be a gentler approach, because speaking can sometimes trigger painful memories.

We also focus on economic recovery. Poverty and precarity play an important role in psychological stability, so we introduced income-generating activities to help women become more independent. Accepting yourself as a survivor, and accepting a child born of violence, is very difficult. The women even created a song saying their children are beautiful.

Rwanda marks 1994 genocide amid tensions over M23 rebellion in DRC

RFI: As a woman and a mother in a survivor family, what gives you the strength to support others?

GM: When I created Sevota, it was a promise I made during the genocide, when people came to kill my children and my husband. In my prayer, I said that if my children survived, I would create this work. My strength comes from transforming my pain into action – that is already an inner victory. I refused to let suffering define my life.

When I met other survivors, I saw that shared pain can become a bond. I feel memory turning into a future, and their courage feeds mine. I know my story can inspire others, and I carry the responsibility of showing that it is possible to rise again.

Each time I see a young person born of violence succeed, each time a mother accepts and embraces her child, each time she dares to dream of a better future, then we are standing. Standing for dignity, for solidarity and for hope. Because if we survived, it is to live. And if we live, it is to give the world a testimony of resilience and love.
Godelieve Mukasarasi, founder of Sevota, has spent decades supporting women raped during the genocide and children born of sexual violence. @Archives SEVOTA


RFI: You have supported what you call “children born of chance” – children born of sexual violence, often rejected and long stigmatised. You say their image has changed. How?

GM: In the past, these children were seen very negatively. They were called children of misfortune, children of the bush, mixed children like their fathers, even traitors, and so on. Today, thanks to support, that image has changed in many ways.

They are now seen as innocent children. They are no longer defined only by the circumstances of their birth, but by their talents, ambitions and achievements. Their image has moved from stigmatised victims to young people who carry the future.

RFI: More than 30 years after the genocide, how is trauma passed on in Rwandan society, when most of the population was born after it?

GM: Trauma is now passed on across generations. Young people still carry indirect effects of what their mothers and society lived through. Some parents still suffer from post-traumatic stress and can pass on anxiety, depression and relationship difficulties to their children.

Rwanda has built a strong model of remembrance, with annual commemorations, museums and NGOs like Ibuka [an umbrella organisation representing genocide survivors] that keep the memory alive. This is very important to prevent another genocide. But young people born afterwards must still deal with a past they did not experience.

Psychologists say they need support from trained teachers, therapists and institutions to help turn this trauma into constructive memory rather than a psychological burden.

Court weighs survivors' claim that French troops stood by during Rwanda genocide

RFI: In your book, you mention the Pelicot trial in France after the repeated rapes suffered by Gisèle Pelicot while she was drugged. You describe it as a turning point. What did that trial mean to you?

GM: That trial was seen as a real turning point. It marked a change in how French and international society deals with sexual violence, especially crimes committed under chemical submission. It strongly echoed our own struggle for recognition of victims and against impunity.

It highlighted forms of violence that are often invisible and minimised. This echoes what many women in Rwanda, and also in Syria and elsewhere, experienced during and after the genocide, often in silence.

RFI: What are your ongoing projects with Sevota in Rwanda?

GM: We are building a peace institute. It will include training, education and meeting spaces, as well as rooms for vocational learning for young people and for medical consultations. There will also be a museum dedicated to women who testified at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda.

And there will be a garden of memory and gratitude called the Garden of the Righteous of Humanity, in Kamonyi [a district in southern Rwanda where massacres took place]. It will be used especially to educate young people about the genocide against the Tutsis in 1994, but also about other genocides.

This interview has been adapted from an audio version in French by and lightly edited for clarity.

US, Iran agree to ceasefire as Trump pulls back on threat to destroy Iranian 'civilisation'


The US and Iran on Wednesday agreed to a two-week ceasefire, reaching a deal just hours before President Donald Trump's deadline and threatened destruction of Iranian "civilisation" if Tehran failed to unblock the Strait of Hormuz. Details of the Pakistan-brokered agreement are set to be negotiated in Islamabad on Friday. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the truce deal does not include Lebanon.



Issued on: 08/04/2026 -
By: FRANCE 24


Iranians react after a ceasefire announcement at the Enqelab square in Tehran on April 8 2026. © AFP

The United States and Iran reached a two-week ceasefire Wednesday as US President Donald Trump pulled back from his threats to destroy Iranian "civilisation".

But questions emerged over what appeared to be duelling proposals to halt the regionwide war and reopen the vital Strait of Hormuz, with Iran insisting it would charge tolls to passing ships and continue to enrich uranium.

Trump then suggested American warships would be “hangin’ around” the waterway, through which 20 percent of all oil and natural gas passes in peacetime. That could be a potential flashpoint as the days goes on.

Trump initially said had Iran proposed a “workable” 10-point plan that could help end the war he launched with Israel on February 28. But he later called the plan fraudulent without elaborating. Trump has said ending Iran’s nuclear program was a key war goal.

Israel backed the US ceasefire with Iran, but Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Wednesday it won't stop his country's fight against Hezbollah in Lebanon, which continued through the morning.

US-Iran ceasefire ‘a major problem domestically’ for Netanyahu
© France 24
01:19


That contradicted comments from Pakistan, a key mediator, which said the ceasefire included the fighting in Lebanon.

Pakistan said that talks over cementing a peace plan would begin in Islamabad as soon as Friday. Pakistan also said the ceasefire was to begin immediately, while Iran launched attacks on Gulf Arab states and Israel soon after.

Oil prices fell and stocks rose as Asian markets opened Wednesday after the eleventh-hour agreement to reopen the strait.

In the streets of Tehran, pro-government demonstrators screamed: “Death to America, death to Israel, death to compromisers!” after the ceasefire announcement and burned American and Israeli flags. It shows the ongoing anger from hard-liners, who had been preparing for what many assumed would be an apocalyptical battle with the United States.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said passage through the strait would be allowed under Iranian military management. It wasn’t clear whether that meant Iran would completely loosen its chokehold on the waterway.

Iran views ceasefire as 'victory against the United States and Israel'

© France 24
01:36



The plan allows for both Iran and Oman to charge fees on ships transiting through the strait, according to a regional official who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss negotiations they were directly involved in. The official said Iran would use the money it raised for reconstruction.

But that would upend decades of reliance on the strait as an international waterway free for transit and will likely not be acceptable to the Gulf Arab states, which also need to rebuild after repeated Iranian attacks targeting their oil fields.

“Big money will be made. Iran can start the reconstruction process,” Trump said on social media.

It's not clear what happens when the two weeks of the ceasefire ends.

There's little public sign that Iran and the United States had resolved disagreements over the fate of Iran's nuclear program, its ballistic missiles or its regional proxies – among the issues that the United States and Israel cited as justifications for launching the war.

In addition to control of the strait, Iran’s demands for ending the war include withdrawal of US combat forces from the region, the lifting of sanctions and the release of its frozen assets.

All those likely are nonstarters for Trump and potentially other Western nations. Iran’s chokehold on the strait roiled the world economy and raised the pressure on Trump to reach a deal.

Since the war began, Trump has repeatedly backed off deadlines just before they expire. In doing so again Tuesday, Trump said in a social media post he had come to the decision “based on conversations” with Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Gen. Asim Munir, Pakistan’s powerful army chief.

There are concerns in Israel about the agreement, according to a person familiar with the situation who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not allowed to speak to the media. The person said Israel would like to achieve more.

Missile alerts were issued in the United Arab Emirates, Israel, Saudi ArabiaBahrain and Kuwait after the ceasefire announcement. A gas processing facility in Abu Dhabi was ablaze after incoming Iranian fire, officials said.

Earlier Tuesday the Israeli military said it attacked an Iranian petrochemical site in Shiraz, the second day in a row it hit such a facility. The military later said it struck bridges used by Iranian forces to transport weapons and military equipment.

More than 1,900 people had been killed in Iran as of late March, but the government has not updated the war's toll for days.

In Lebanon, where Israel is fighting Iran-backed Hezbollah militants, more than 1,500 people have been killed. and 1 million people have been displaced. Eleven Israeli soldiers have died.

In Gulf Arab states and the occupied West Bank, more than two dozen people have died, while 23 have been reported dead in Israel, and 13 U.S. service members have been killed.

(FRANCE 24 with AP)


How Pakistan brokered a two-week ceasefire deal between Iran and the US

Pakistan cast itself as an unlikely diplomatic broker on Wednesday, saying it had helped secure a two-week ceasefire between Iran and the United States. Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif also said he would host talks in Islamabad aimed at ending the Middle East war beginning on April 10.

Issued on: 08/04/2026 - 
By: FRANCE 24


A vendor displays morning newspapers at his roadside stall in Islamabad. Pakistan has emerged as a key intermediary between Iran and the United States to secure a temporary ceasefire and host negotiations to end the war in the Middle East. © Aamir Qureshi, AFP

Pakistan has emerged as a key intermediary between Iran and the United States to secure a temporary ceasefire and host negotiations to end the war in the Middle East.

On Wednesday, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said the United States and Iran had agreed to a ceasefire "everywhere" following mediation by his government.

Sharif said the two-week truce – which Trump and Tehran had announced earlier – would next lead to talks in the Pakistan capital.

"Pakistan achieved one of its biggest diplomatic wins in years," said South Asia expert Michael Kugelman in an X post.

"It also defied many skeptics and naysayers that didn’t think it had the capacity to pull off such a complex, high-stakes feat."

Iran positively reviewing Pakistan’s request for a two-week ceasefire, source says

© France 24
05:10



What are Pakistan's ties to Iran?

"Pakistan has strong credentials as the only country in the region enjoying good relations with the US and Iran," said the country's former ambassador to Tehran, Asif Durrani.

Pakistan shares a 900-kilometre (560-mile) border in its southwest with Iran, and also deep historical, cultural and religious links.

Pakistan is home to the world's second-biggest Shia Muslim population after Iran.

Iran was the first country to recognise Pakistan after independence in 1947. Pakistan returned the favour for the Islamic republic after the 1979 revolution.

Pakistan also represents some Iranian diplomatic interests in Washington, where Tehran has no embassy.
How about the US?

Pakistan's powerful army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, has built up a personal rapport with US President Donald Trump.

Munir – in a Western business suit rather than army fatigues – visited Washington with Sharif last year after a flare-up in hostilities between Pakistan and India in divided Kashmir.

Sharif praised Trump's "bold and visionary" intervention, while Munir said the US leader deserved the Nobel Peace Prize for stopping an escalation between the nuclear-armed neighbours.

On Iran, Trump said Pakistan knows the country "better than most".

Personal relations have long helped boost bilateral ties shaped by shifting strategic interests that have at times been strained.

Even as a non-NATO ally in the post-9/11 "war on terror", Pakistan faced US claims that it was harbouring militants who were responsible for attacking coalition troops across the border in Afghanistan.

Relations strained further when US troops killed al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden on Pakistani soil in 2011 without telling Islamabad, and Pakistan faced accusations of complicity in harbouring the fugitive.
How about other regional players?

Pakistan and Saudi Arabia signed a strategic mutual defence agreement in 2025, cementing longstanding ties but also restricting how far Islamabad could go in supporting Tehran.

Sharif and his government have been quick to keep Riyadh on side, and the prime minister recently visited for talks with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

Pakistan also shares close ties with Beijing, which, Trump told AFP, helped get Iran across the line to the negotiating table.

Pakistan's Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar hosted a meeting with counterparts from Saudi ArabiaTurkey and Egypt last month for discussions on de-escalating the conflict and then flew to Beijing for further talks.

China, which is Iran's largest trading partner, then joined its longstanding South Asian ally in calling for a plan to end the fighting engulfing the Middle East, saying it supported "Pakistan playing a unique and important role in easing the situation".
What's in it for Pakistan?

Neutrality makes economic sense for Pakistan, which relies on oil and gas imports through the Strait of Hormuz and wants to avoid getting dragged into further conflict on its doorstep.

Continued disruption would have worsened fuel supplies, driven up prices and forced further austerity measures for the cash-strapped government.

A permanent end to the war would not only boost regional stability but also Pakistan's international standing at a time when it is locked in armed conflict with neigbouring Afghanistan and less than a year after it traded strikes with arch-rival India.
What role will Pakistan play next?

The Pakistani premier said he would welcome US and Iranian delegations to the capital from April 10.

"Iran will feel more comfortable in Islamabad which is why it accepted Pakistan's mediation," said Durrani, the former ambassador, adding Pakistan could help the two sides resolve outstanding differences.

If talks were direct, "then Pakistan may help the parties to fine-tune the language if there is a stalemate", he said, adding that Pakistan officials could also act as the go-between if the two sides would not meet face-to-face.

Pakistan does not formally recognise Israel, which said on Wednesday it supported Trump's decision to suspend bombing, but that the two-week ceasefire did not include Lebanon where it has carried out ground and aerial operations against Iran-backed Hezbollah.

That contradicted Sharif's earlier statement that the ceasefire covered "everywhere including Lebanon".

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)


France pushes for wider truce as Iran ceasefire leaves Lebanon out


French President Emmanuel Macron convened a meeting of top defence and security officials on Wednesday after a two-week ceasefire was agreed between the United States and Iran, calling the deal “a very good thing” but saying it must “fully” include Lebanon.



Issued on: 08/04/2026 - RFI

An anti-war protester holds a sign with a peace dove during a rally near the White House in Washington on 7 April 2026, as a ceasefire in the Iran war was announced. © Getty Images/AFP/Alex Wong

The defence council brought together ministers and senior officials to discuss “the situation in Iran and the Middle East,” the Élysée said. The meeting also addressed the return of two French nationals, Cécile Kohler and Jacques Paris, freed by Iran.

The ceasefire, brokered by Pakistan, comes on the 40th day of the war and is meant to halt fighting for two weeks while negotiations take place. It also includes reopening the Strait of Hormuz, whose disruption to oil shipments drove up global energy prices.

However Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the ceasefire does not include Lebanon, where operations against Hezbollah continued on Wednesday.

Macron said the ceasefire must be fully respected “in the days and weeks to come” and allow negotiations on Iran’s nuclear, ballistic and regional issues.

Pakistan is set to host talks from Friday in Islamabad. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said the deal applied across the region.

“I am pleased to announce that the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America, along with their allies, have agreed to an immediate ceasefire everywhere including Lebanon and elsewhere, effective immediately,” he wrote on X.

Relief and caution

European leaders reacted with cautious optimism but stressed the need for a lasting settlement.

“I welcome the ceasefire agreement reached overnight, which will bring a moment of relief to the region and the world,” said British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in a statement.

Starmer’s office said he would travel to the Middle East for talks with Gulf partners on ensuring the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz remains permanent.

Oman, which had been mediating indirect talks, also welcomed the ceasefire and called for “intensifying efforts” to resolve the crisis.

Germany voiced support for continued diplomacy. “The aim now must be to negotiate a lasting end to the war in the coming days,” said Friedrich Merz. “This can only be achieved through diplomatic channels.”

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha praised the deal and used it to call for similar action against Russia’s war in Ukraine, saying on social media that “American decisiveness works”.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres called on all parties to abide by the terms of the ceasefire “to pave the way towards a lasting and comprehensive peace in the region”, his spokesman said.

Terms and tensions

However, key details of the agreement remain unclear, with differing accounts from the parties involved.

US President Donald Trump said he agreed to suspend attacks after Iran proposed what he described as a “workable” plan, before later calling it fraudulent without elaborating.

He had earlier warned that “A whole civilisation will die tonight, never to be brought back again.”

Iran said ships would be allowed through the strait under military supervision and could be charged fees. A regional official told the Associated Press that both Iran and Oman would collect those fees, with Tehran expected to use the money for reconstruction.

(with newswires)






What we know about Iran’s 10-point plan for ending war with US, Israel

Iran proposed a 10-point plan for ending the war with the US and Israel early Wednesday after the establishment of a two-week ceasefire just before a US-imposed deadline and threats to destroy Iranian "civilisation". US President Donald Trump said the plan was "workable", despite several points which Washington had previously said were unfeasible.


Issued on: 08/04/2026 
By: FRANCE 24

Women hold posters of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei during a campaign in support of the government at the Enqelab-e-Eslami, or Islamic Revolution, square in downtown Tehran, Iran, Saturday, March 14, 2026. © Vahid Salemi, AP

The United States and Iran agreed to a two-week ceasefire barely an hour before President Donald Trump's Wednesday deadline to obliterate the country was set to expire, with Tehran to temporarily reopen the vital Strait of Hormuz.

Both sides claimed to have won the more than month-long conflict that has roiled global financial markets and sent oil prices skyrocketing, with Trump telling AFP the deal was a "total and complete victory" for the US.

Iran too cast the ceasefire as a win and said it had agreed to talks with Washington to begin Friday in Pakistan on a path to end the conflict. "The enemy has suffered an undeniable, historic and crushing defeat in its cowardly, illegal and criminal war against the Iranian nation," said a statement from the Iranian Supreme National Security Council. "Iran achieved a great victory."

What's next? Tehran said it would negotiate with the United States in Islamabad beginning Friday. Iran has proposed a 10-point plan for securing an end to the war, which Trump said was "workable". But while the plan could form the basis of potential negotiations, it includes several sticking points which Washington has previously said were unfeasible.
Lifting of sanctions, control over Hormuz...

The plan would require "continued Iranian control over the Strait of Hormuz, acceptance of enrichment, lifting of all primary and secondary sanctions", according to a statement released by the Islamic republic.

While the uranium enrichment demand was not included in Tehran's English-language statement shared by the UN, it was part of the Farsi release circulated by Iranian state media.

Other demands include US military withdrawal from the Middle East, an end to attacks on Iran and its allies, the release of frozen Iranian assets and a UN Security Council resolution making the deal binding.

The plan requires:

• The lifting of all primary and secondary sanctions on Iran.

• Continued Iranian control over the strait of Hormuz.

• US military withdrawal from the Middle East.

• An end to attacks on Iran and its allies.

• The release of frozen Iranian assets.

• A UN security council resolution making any deal binding.

In the version released in Farsi, Iran also included the phrase “acceptance of enrichment” for its nuclear program. But for reasons that remain unclear, that phrase was missing in English versions shared by Iranian diplomats to journalists.

Pakistan’s prime minister, Shehbaz Sharif, who helped mediate the ceasefire, said it would start immediately, and the capital Islamabad would host delegates from both countries for talks due to begin on Friday. The talks would be aimed at reaching a "conclusive agreement", he said.

Iran said it would allocate two weeks for the negotiations.

The White House was considering talks in Pakistan but plans were not finalised, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said.

(FRANCE 24 with AFP and AP)


Shipping companies 'see opportunities' but seek clarity on Strait of Hormuz reopening

The Indian flagged LPG carrier Jag Vasant transporting LNG at the Mumbai Port after it arrived clearing the Strait of Hormuz, India, 1 April 2026
Copyright AP Photo/Rafiq Maqbool

By Quirino Mealha
Published on 

Major shipping lines express cautious optimism over transit opportunities in the Strait of Hormuz after the US-Iran ceasefire was announced, but stress the urgent need for full clarity before any vessels move.

Reports of the two-week US-Iran ceasefire potentially opening the Strait of Hormuz to vessels after over a month of near-total closure has prompted shipping companies to weigh their options against persistent uncertainties.

The world’s second-largest container shipping operator, Maersk, has taken the lead in responding to the development.

“The ceasefire may create transit opportunities, but it does not yet provide full maritime certainty and we need to understand all potential conditions attached,” the Danish company stated.

Maersk further guaranteed it is "working with urgency" to clarify exactly how ships will be able to pass through the Strait of Hormuz following months of severe restrictions.

Decisions on any transits, it emphasised, will depend on continuous risk assessments, close monitoring of the security situation and guidance from authorities and partners.

The German shipping line Hapag-Lloyd has adopted a similarly measured tone.

CEO Rolf Habben-Jansen told clients in a call on Wednesday that it was too early to judge how much traffic would be able to pass through the vital waterway.

Habben-Jansen warned that it would take at least six weeks before the firm could regain a fully normal network, even if some vessels would be able to leave the Gulf fairly soon.

The company estimates that around 1,000 merchant ships remain stuck in the Persian Gulf, six of them belonging to Hapag-Lloyd.

This substantial backlog is expected to make management of any resumption of traffic in the Strait of Hormuz significantly harder, while the conflict continues to cost the firm roughly $55 million (€47.5mn) per week.

US President Donald Trump described the reopening as a core requirement of the ceasefire, calling for the "COMPLETE, IMMEDIATE, and SAFE OPENING" of the Strait of Hormuz and pledging US support for traffic management.

President Trump on the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi stated that, provided attacks on Iran cease, safe passage would be possible for the two-week period via coordination with Iran’s Armed Forces and taking into account technical limitations.

Regional officials have indicated that both Iran and Oman are expected to charge transit fees on vessels, marking a departure from the maritime chokepoint’s previous status as a toll-free route.

Exact amounts and procedures have not been confirmed publicly.

Other shipping operators monitor developments closely

Other companies such as the Japanese shipping and logistics firm NYK Line have also stated they are closely monitoring the situation following the ceasefire announcement.

With hundreds of vessels idling for weeks, opportunity costs have continued to rise through lost revenue, higher insurance premiums and demurrage charges which are fees levied by operators when a ship remains at a port for longer than the agreed-upon time.

Even limited flows during the temporary window could allow some ships to exit the Gulf and serve alternative routes, thereby reducing those accumulated losses.

However, the requirement for military coordination and the introduction of new fees add further layers of uncertainty and complexity that operators categorically state must be resolved before meaningful operational decisions can be taken.

The situation remains fluid as broader talks are scheduled to begin in Islamabad on Friday with Pakistani authorities acting as mediators.

For the time being, the known facts indicate a tightly regulated, two-week period of access rather than an immediate return to pre-conflict operations.

Shipping companies and energy markets will continue to monitor developments closely for further guidance in the coming days.