Tuesday, September 17, 2024

SEE IT'S IN THE PLANNING

‘Too early’ for an Asian NATO: US official

A leading candidate to become Japan’s next leader says he would spearhead the creation of such a bloc.
By Alex Willemyns for RFA
2024.09.17
Washington

‘Too early’ for an Asian NATO: US officialU.S. Assistant Secretary of State for East Asia and Pacific Affairs Daniel Kritenbrink speaks in Taguig, Philippines, May 21, 2024.
 Aaron Favila/AP




  

 


A top U.S. official has rebuffed calls for an “Asian NATO” made by a leading candidate to become Japan’s next prime minister.

Japan’s governing Liberal Democratic Party will next week choose its new leader and thereby anoint a successor to Fumio Kishida, who last month announced he would step down amid lagging popularity.

One of the three leading candidates to replace Kishida, the 67-year-old former Defense Minister Shigeru Ishiba, has argued that Tokyo should lead the creation of a formal security alliance in Asia similar to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, which commits its 32 member countries to each other’s defense in the event any are attacked.

20240917-ASIAN-NATO-CHINA-UNITED-STATES-003.jpg
Japan's former Defense Minister Shigeru Ishiba, holds up a sign that reads “Reassurance and Safety to Everyone” during a debate at the Japan National Press Club in Tokyo, Sept. 14, 2024. (Takashi Aoyama/Pool Photo via AP)

But speaking at a forum on Indo-Pacific security at the Stimson Center on Tuesday, Daniel Kritenbrink, the assistant U.S. secretary of state for East Asia and the Pacific, said he thought the proposal was hasty.

“It's too early to talk about collective security in that context, and [the creation of] more formal institutions,” Kritenbrink said, advocating for a continuation of the Biden administration’s foreign-policy approach of building a “latticework” of U.S. alliances in the region.

“What we're focused on is investing in the region's existing formal architecture and continuing to build this network of formal and informal relationships,” he said. “And then we'll see where that goes.”

But Kritenbrink said Washington took a neutral stance on the internal party election.

“Maybe one final comment,” he said, “just so people don't think I'm commenting on the Japanese election – we look forward to working with whomever is elected, and I'm confident that whoever is prime minister is going to be great for the U.S.-Japan alliance.”

Asian NATO

Proposals for an “Asian NATO” have rankled Beijing, which sees itself as the ultimate focus of any such bloc in a similar way that Moscow has often blasted NATO itself for its focus on defense against Russia.


Related stories

South Korea, Japan and US vow ‘new era’

US and China spar over nuclear weapons build-up

NATO calls China ‘decisive enabler’ of Russia’s war in Ukraine

Chinese and Russian bomber jets intercepted near Alaska


At the Shangri-La defense dialogue in Singapore in June, a top Chinese military leader accused the United States of trying to slowly introduce such a security alliance by building up its historical ties between Japan and South Korea into an “institutional” alliance.

20240917-ASIAN-NATO-CHINA-UNITED-STATES-002.jpg
China's Deputy chief of Staff of the Joint Staff Department of the Central Military Commission Lt. Gen. Jing Jianfeng delivers his remarks during the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Defense Ministers' Meeting Plus in Jakarta, Indonesia, Nov. 16, 2023. (Willy Kurniawan/Pool Photo via AP)

Washington was trying to create an Asian NATO as a method of “tying the region’s countries to the U.S. war chariot,” Lieutenant Gen. Jing Jianfeng said at the forum, describing the Biden administration’s “latticework” of alliances as a stepping stone to something more.

“The real purpose is to merge the small circle into the large circle of the Asia-Pacific version of NATO so as to maintain the hegemony led by the U.S.,” he said, blaming “selfish U.S. geopolitical interests.”

But American officials have long denied any plans for such a bloc in Asia, describing the geopolitical situation in the region as different from that in Europe, with little to gain from institutionalization.

Edited by Malcolm Foster

No comments: