Tuesday, June 16, 2026

 


Americans strongly support regulations on AI


New poll finds even AI proponents want more rules

Reports and Proceedings

Johns Hopkins University

Even People Who Trust AI Want Rules for It 

image: 

Most Americans, even those who most appreciate AI, strongly support more regulation of it, a new survey by Johns Hopkins University researchers finds.

More than 70% of Americans want the right to interact with a human rather than an AI in medical, legal, educational and government settings. This proposed regulation and others were endorsed across party lines and by both regular users of AI and novices.

view more 

Credit: Johns Hopkins University




Most Americans, even those who most appreciate AI, strongly support more regulation of it, a new survey by Johns Hopkins University researchers finds.

More than 70% of Americans want the right to interact with a human rather than an AI in medical, legal, educational and government settings. This proposed regulation and others were endorsed across party lines and by both regular users of AI and novices.

“What was surprising to us in this new poll was that daily users of AI, and people who view AI positively, also want regulation,” said Christopher Honey, a computational cognitive neuroscientist at Johns Hopkins and a member of the university’s Data Science and AI Institute.

In April and May, more than 2,000 people in the United States were asked their views on artificial intelligence. Questions explored how people generally felt about the technology, how much they trusted it in personal and workplace settings, and about their support for new laws being considered across the country.

Americans’ overall feelings about AI are split: about one third positive, one third negative, and one third mixed. These overall attitudes varied greatly with how often people use AI: 80% of skilled daily users feel positively about AI versus 24% of people who have only tried it a few times.

Younger people were more positive about AI: 41% of adults ages 18 to 29 had a positive overall view, compared with 18% of adults 60 and older. At the same time, younger people felt more pressure to use AI at work: nearly 50% of working adults ages 18 to 29 reported feeling pressure to use AI, compared with about 20% of adults ages 60 and older.

Republicans and Democrats felt similarly about the technology.

Most Americans strongly support “right to a human” laws which would allow them to opt out of AI interactions. People want to deal with people when it comes to medical care (79%), legal proceedings (76%), and education (74%).

Americans strongly support more rules to protect their privacy and to make AI more transparent:

  • 75% want to be told when they’re interacting with AI
  • 73% want to ban AI from using individuals’ faces and voices
  • 68% want labels on AI-generated images and video

Americans trust AI for certain tasks more than others:

  • Look up factual information: 67% trust AI somewhat or a great deal
  • File taxes: 42% trust it somewhat or a great deal
  • Create art or music: 57% trust it somewhat or a great deal
  • Be a coworker: 32% trust it somewhat or a great deal
  • Manage retirement: 33% trust it somewhat or a great deal
  • Provide medical advice: 63% don’t trust it much or at all
  • Teach high school: 69% don’t trust it much or at all
  • Decide a court case: 81% don’t trust it much or at all
  • Drive a car: 76% don’t trust it much or at all

Clear Majorities Want Legal Restrictions on AI 

Most Americans strongly support “right to a human” laws which would allow them to opt out of AI interactions. People want to deal with people when it comes to medical care (79%), legal proceedings (76%), and education (74%).

Credit

Johns Hopkins University

About six in ten U.S. adults expect AI to widen inequality over the next decade. There was broad support for a “digital dividend,” which is a small monthly payment to every American adult that is funded by a tax on large tech companies: this was endorsed by Republicans (52%), Democrats (60%) and political independents (52%).

As AI advances, about four in 10 Americans expect the large technology companies to reap the biggest gains in power. Fewer than 1 in 10 expect individuals to gain the most power. And nearly 1 in 5 Americans think that it will be the AI systems themselves.

“We were interested to hear the national voice as the public tries to understand these problems. What are people thinking and feeling?” said Rolando Masís-Obando, a computational neuroscientist who uses AI to study how people think and remember. “We are taking the pulse of the nation with this poll and we want to run this every year to see how opinions change over time.”

Full findings and methodology: https://futurerealities.org/poll/2026/

The findings will be presented and discussed at The Future of Our Realities 2026 conference on June 20 at the Hopkins Bloomberg Center in Washington, DC.

The work was supported by a Johns Hopkins University Nexus Award.


Open-source artificial intelligence is reshaping the future of humanity: Scientists question, if the world is ready




University of Groningen

Graphical summary of the paper 

image: 

Solutions for the open-source Artificial Intelligence (AI) transition.

view more 

Credit: Kai Wu






Open-source artificial intelligence is advancing faster than the world can govern it, and the consequences could reshape the future of sustainability, democracy, and global development. In a new comment published in Nature Communications, an international team of researchers warns that without coordinated action, open-source AI could also increase environmental pressures, deepen technological inequalities, and facilitate the spread of misinformation.

Open-source artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly becoming a powerful tool for tackling some of the world's most pressing challenges, from climate change and food security to energy access and sustainable development. Min Chen, the lead author and a professor at Nanjing Normal University, emphasizes: 'Open-source AI implementation strategies must now evolve. We therefore propose four governance actions to manage opportunities while reducing the uncertainties associated with open-source AI.'

In the comment, more than 20 researchers therefore propose four governance actions to ensure that open-source AI contributes positively to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) while minimizing environmental, social, and political risks.

Prajal Pradhan, co-author and associate professor at the University of Groningen, highlights: 'Its openness enables researchers, governments, and communities worldwide to adapt AI solutions to local needs, making it a promising accelerator of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), but not without effective governance.'

To ensure open-source AI benefits society rather than creating new problems, the researchers identify four practical areas where action is urgently needed.

1. Integrate sustainability across the entire AI lifecycle

AI models rely on massive data centers, energy-intensive computing, and increasingly scarce raw materials. The researchers argue that the environmental costs of AI should be assessed across its entire lifecycle, i.e., from manufacturing computer chips to running large-scale AI systems.

For example, if an AI model helps cities to reduce energy use, those sustainability benefits should be weighed against the electricity and resources required to build and operate the AI system.

2. Develop SDG-focused evaluation frameworks

Many AI applications claim to support sustainability goals, but there are few systematic ways to verify these claims. The researchers therefore call for better tools and datasets that can measure how AI affects issues such as poverty reduction, food security, climate action, and inequality. Such frameworks would help policymakers distinguish genuinely beneficial AI applications from those that might create unintended social or environmental harms.

3. Strengthen accountability and governance

As AI-generated content becomes more difficult to distinguish from reality, stronger safeguards are needed. The researchers point to growing concerns over deepfakes, manipulated images, and AI-generated misinformation. They argue that governments, developers, and users must share responsibility for ensuring transparency, including clear labeling of synthetic content and stronger accountability when AI systems are misused.

4. Expand global cooperation and knowledge sharing

The researchers stress that unequal access to computing infrastructure, data, and technical expertise risks deepening global inequalities. They advocate for open-access platforms aligned with FAIR principles (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability) and for stronger collaboration between global AI initiatives and regional research centers. In doing so, users from all over the world can access open platforms to upload locally relevant data and apply shared or pre-trained AI models to analyze context-specific challenges related to the SDGs.

Open-source AI beyond 2030

The comment resonates with discussions at the India Artificial Intelligence Impact Summit, held in February 2026, where policymakers and experts emphasized the growing importance of practical AI applications and their societal impact.

The researchers summarize that open-source AI could become a transformative force in shaping the post-2030 global sustainability agenda. By enabling more localized, inclusive, and evidence-based decision-making, open-source AI could help shift sustainability governance away from top-down systems toward more participatory approaches, bringing science, academia, civil society, governance, and the private sector together.

Klaus Hubacek, co-author and professor at the University of Groningen, concludes: 'Governance decisions made today will determine whether open-source AI becomes a driver of sustainable and equitable development or a source of new inequalities and environmental pressures.'

Reference: Min Chen, Kai Wu, Prajal Pradhan, Cameron Allen, Stefano Nativi, Klaus Hubacek, Alexey Voinov, Felix Creutzig, Tatiana Filatova, Niklas Boers, Michael Meadows, Peilong Ma, Frank Biermann, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, John Ludden, Maria Paradiso, Michael Batty, Huadong Guo, Min Cao, Peng Hou, and Guonian Lü. (2026): Steering Open-Source AI to Accelerate the Sustainable Development Goals.

Cleveland Clinic and IBM forum highlights advancements in AI and quantum computing for healthcare research



Third annual Cleveland Discovery and Innovation Forum convenes global leaders to examine the future of advanced computing in biomedical research




Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland Discovery and Innovation Forum, hosted by Cleveland Clinic and IBM 

image: 

Fireside chat at the Cleveland Discovery and Innovation Forum, hosted by Cleveland Clinic and IBM.

view more 

Credit: Cleveland Clinic





Cleveland: The third annual Cleveland Discovery and Innovation Forum, hosted by Cleveland Clinic and IBM, highlighted progress in applying quantum computing and AI to healthcare and life sciences research. The forum brought together global leaders in healthcare, science and technology to share insights into how advanced computing is accelerating discovery and shaping the future of patient care.

The one-day event, held today on Cleveland Clinic’s Main Campus, featured more than 30 speakers from academia, industry, foundations, venture capital and government. Discussions focused on the growing impact of AI and quantum computing in tackling some of the most complex challenges in healthcare and life sciences research.

“The Cleveland Discovery and Innovation Forum highlighted how AI and quantum computing are advancing research across every stage of disease – from prevention and early detection to treatment,” said Lara Jehi, M.D., Cleveland Clinic’s Chief Research Information Officer. “Cleveland Clinic is at the forefront of applying quantum computing to life sciences research. Through this forum and our broader research efforts, we are helping define how advanced computing can unlock new scientific insights and ultimately improve care for patients around the world.”

The forum also highlighted five years of progress by Cleveland Clinic’s and IBM’s Discovery Accelerator, a partnership focused on advancing the pace of biomedical research through high-performance computing, AI and quantum computing. Since its launch, the Discovery Accelerator has supported more than 50 projects, contributed to multiple peer-reviewed publications and developed an innovative education curriculum aimed at building the skilled workforce needed for the future.

“As we mark five years of our collaboration with Cleveland Clinic, we are seeing how quantum and AI can work together to transform biomedical research — modeling molecular interactions, refining machine learning for personalized care, and pushing the boundaries of what's achievable across healthcare and life sciences,” said Alessandro Curioni, Ph.D., IBM Fellow and Vice President, Algorithms and Applications, IBM Research.

The agenda included keynote presentations, panel discussions and fireside chats led by Cleveland Clinic and IBM executives alongside international leaders. Featured speakers included Eric Isaacs, Ph.D., of Research Corporation for Science Advancement; Curtis Priem, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and co-founder of NVIDIA; Alex Shalek, Ph.D., MIT; Sergii Strelchuk, University of Oxford; Serpil Erzurum, M.D., Cleveland Clinic; Alessandro Curioni, Ph.D., IBM; and Percy Carter, Pfizer.

Sessions included panels on applied quantum computing and its role in building a world-class research and healthcare ecosystem, and how AI and quantum computing can realize the potential of personalized therapy as well as a fireside chat on visionary leadership and advanced computational methods in healthcare.

The forum also featured a project showcase from Cleveland Clinic and IBM researchers, including recent work modeling a protein of more than 12,000 atoms, the largest protein structure known to be simulated on a quantum computer. The findings underscore the growing potential of quantum computers as scientific tools for solving fundamental problems in biology, chemistry and life sciences.

Several research announcements and updates were shared during the event and highlighted Cleveland Clinic’s steadfast progress in shaping quantum computing applications in medicine, and building the Ohio Discovery Corridor through its Cleveland Innovation District. These included:

  • 2026 Global Quantum + AI Challenge: Details were shared on the international competition launched by the Quantum Insider and Cleveland Clinic. The year-long program is designed to bridge the gap between quantum theory and real-world impact, and unites enterprises, start-ups and research teams to accelerate the adoption of advanced computing technologies in industries where innovation drives competitive advantage. Cleveland Clinic’s challenge is titled: Unlocking Undruggable Targets: Quantum Simulation of Allosteric Signal Propagation. The challenge will award $200,000 across five enterprise challenges, with $40,000 allocated per challenge. Applications are now open: https://quantumaiportal.thequantuminsider.com/

 

  • Cleveland Clinic Quantum Catalyzer Program: Updates on this year’s program, which provides quantum access to start-up companies, as well as Kipu. The Kipu project will focus on a breakthrough quantum algorithm to simulate protein folding, helping researchers better understand disease and develop new treatments. Earlier this year, the competitive program selected EntangleBio, Polaris Quantum Biotech and Singularity Quantum. This year’s selected companies will also receive up to $250,000 from K5 Tokyo Black Fund with an in-kind match from Cleveland Clinic.
     

No comments: