Thursday, May 28, 2026

Europe Turns to Canadian LNG as Gulf and Russian Gas Risks Deepen

A number of European energy utilities have expressed interest in buying the future output of the Ksi Lisims LNG project, which will be Canada’s second export facility for liquefied gas.

The Ksi Lisims LNG facility already has offtake agreements for 5 million tons in annual production, but the companies behind the project want to secure commitments for another 3 to 4 million tons, the chief executive of Western LNG, the project leader, told Reuters in an interview.

The Ksi Lisims plant will have a total annual capacity of 12 million tons of superchilled gas, and once the additional purchase commitments are secured, the project will proceed to a final investment decision, the publication also reported.

The Reuters interview follows news that Ksi Lisims had secured an offtake commitment from Germany’s state-owned utility SEFE, set up specifically to boost the country’s supply of natural gas. This is Ksi Lisims LNG’s first commitment from a European company, as the continent scrambles to find gas supplies that are not under sanctions and do not originate in a Gulf state.

The Ksi Lisims LNG facility, if the final investment decision is made, will produce gas from two floating platforms, aiming for a low-emission profile in tune with the federal Canadian government’s priorities, which recently changed somewhat, putting the exploitation of the country’s abundant hydrocarbon resources higher.

The markets for this LNG will be in the Pacific Basin, per the project’s website, with a focus on Asia, where demand for low-emission fuels is growing. However, the talks with European energy buyers suggest strongly that plans for future markets are flexible and the gas will go where it is needed, possibly regardless of the price, since European importers do not really have a lot of options to choose from when it comes to gas sellers.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com


German utility to buy one million tonnes of LNG per year from Ksi Lisims project


Updated:

VANCOUVER — A German utility has signed a long-term agreement to buy one million tonnes of liquefied natural gas per year from the yet-to-be-built Ksi Lisims project in northern British Columbia as European countries look to lock down reliable fuel supplies in a turbulent geopolitical landscape. 

Deliveries to German government-owned company Securing Energy for Europe, or SEFE, are to begin in the early 2030s and cover a period of up to 20 years, Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson told a news conference in Vancouver on Wednesday. 

“In a moment that feels uncertain and volatile, the world trusts Canada,” Hodgson said. 

Houston-based Western LNG is the lead developer and future operator of Ksi Lisims alongside Rockies LNG, a consortium of Canadian natural gas producers, and the Nisga’a Nation, on whose lands the project would be located. The floating plant would export up to 12 million tonnes of LNG per year from the site on Pearse Island, by the Alaska border. 

The $10-billion project has regulatory approval but the partners have yet to make a final investment decision. 


“Our agreement with SEFE reflects growing confidence in Ksi Lisims LNG, our commercial and engineering approach, and brings our project a significant step closer to starting construction,” said David Thames, head of Western LNG. 

‘A real project

LNG is natural gas that has been chilled into a liquid state, enabling it to be shipped by sea on specialized tankers. The federal and B.C. governments are supportive of its development, touting it as a cleaner alternative to coal for power generation and a bridge in the gradual transition away from fossil fuels. It is also seen as a way to bolster the energy security of Canada’s allies amid a global supply crunch. 

“This is a significant project that will contribute now and in the future to regional, provincial and national prosperity,” said Adrian Dix, B.C.’s minister of energy and climate solutions. 

“It’s a substantial project. It’s a real project.”

Federal Conservative Opposition Leader Pierre Poilievre downplayed the gravity of Wednesday’s announcement.  

“You actually don’t need to sign new agreements because the rest of the world is already begging for our energy,” he told reporters in Ottawa. 

“It doesn’t take a master negotiator to convince a man in the desert to take a glass of water, right? It takes the ability to deliver the glass of the water.”

Ksi Lisims and other B.C. LNG projects were developed with exports to Asia in mind, given the short shipping distance across the Pacific. 

Germany would not seem to be a logical buyer for western Canadian gas based solely on geography, but Hodgson said other considerations were at play for SEFE. 

“We are a reliable partner in a world where reliable partners are increasingly hard to find,” he said. 


European countries have looked to source gas from places other than Russia, which had been their dominant supplier, since that country’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. 

The next region they looked to was the Middle East. But the U.S.-Israel war with Iran has choked off LNG shipments from that region since late February. 

Cargoes from Ksi Lisims could travel to Germany via the Panama Canal, provided vessels are small enough, or take the long way around South America or Africa, Hodgson said. But more likely are swap deals, where SEFE could essentially trade cargoes with another company with a ship headed in the right direction. 

Ksi Lisims project facing opposition

The Ksi Lisims project, and a natural gas pipeline that would connect to it, have been facing stiff opposition from environmental advocates and legal challenges from some First Nations. 

“First Nations are already experiencing the devastating impacts of climate change first-hand, and we cannot continue gambling future generations’ prosperity, health, and well-being on an industry that places increasing pressure on our lands, waters, salmon, and ecosystems,” said Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, with the Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs. 

Jesse Stoeppler, co-executive director of the Skeena Watershed Conservation Coalition, said Canadians deserve “honest conversations” about the risks the project entails. 

“A government announcement does not create Indigenous consent, resolve active litigation or guarantee economic viability.”

Eva Clayton, president of the Nisga’a Lisims Government, told the news conference that there were “a whole mixture of thoughts” when her nation consulted with other Indigenous communities during the project’s early days. 

“But more and more of our Indigenous people are beginning to recognize the very trying times that the world is facing,” she said.

“And so they’re looking at ways to bring prosperity to their people, because when you think about it ... we’re managing poverty. We now want to manage prosperity.”

The LNG Canada facility further south along the coast in Kitimat, B.C. and owned by Shell and four Asian firms, was the first project of its kind to start up in this country almost a year ago. 

Ksi Lisims and an expansion to LNG Canada have been referred to the major projects office, which aims to speed along approvals for infrastructure deemed in Canada’s national interest. 

The Cedar LNG project in Kitimat and Woodfibre LNG project near Squamish, B.C., are under construction. 

‘A new revolution’

Environmental groups have disputed politicians’ and industry players’ casting of LNG as a green transition fuel. They point to emissions of methane — a more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide and the main component of natural gas — all the way from the well head to its end use. 

“Ksi Lisims LNG will lock in decades of planet-heating pollution while doubling down on an economic model held hostage to the whims of the world’s volatile powers,” said David Quigg, organizer with Sierra Club B.C. 

Hodgson was asked at the news conference about whether LNG would displace more polluting fuels or simply feed the gargantuan power needs of artificial intelligence data centres.  

“We need to engage in the world as it is, not as we wish it to be,” the minister replied. 

“The AI revolution is a real revolution. It is a new revolution. It is dramatically increasing the demand for power, on top of already a need to electrify our economies to reduce carbon footprints.

“So the reality is, every country is looking at significantly increased demand for electricity.’”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 27, 2026.

-- With files from Chuck Chiang in Vancouver and Sarah Ritchie in Ottawa

Reported Germany-Canada LNG deal would bolster investment case for Ksi Lisims: Eby


Published:

Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Tim Hodgson speaks at the annual First Nations Major Projects Coalition conference in Toronto on Thursday, April 30, 2026. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sammy Kogan

KANANASKIS — British Columbia Premier David Eby says a deal for Canada to supply liquefied natural gas to Germany makes it more likely the Ksi Lisims project on the West Coast will proceed.

Eby made his remarks after multiple outlets reported German firm SEFE is poised to buy gas from the proposed $10-billion plant and export terminal near the border with Alaska.

Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson is poised to make an announcement “regarding international energy exports” in Vancouver on Wednesday.

Ksi Lisims is a partnership between Western LNG, Rockies LNG and the Nisga’a Nation.

Their project has regulatory approval, but the consortium has yet to make a final investment decision.


Eby says sealing up offtake agreements with buyers is a key step before the Ksi Lisims partners reach that milestone.

“I feel like British Columbia is throwing the ball up and it’s giving the federal government a chance to take that alley-oop and dunk it,” Eby told reporters after a meeting with western premiers in Kananaskis, Alta.

“And this announcement that the federal government will be sharing more about is about how we can work together to deepen those trading relationships around the world, in this case with Germany.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 25, 2026.



Europe’s Arctic Oil Dilemma Deepens as Supply Fears Grow

A dozen financial institutions from Scandinavia have urged the European Commission to remain firm in its opposition to Arctic oil drilling even as the bloc faces physical oil shortages in weeks, according to energy experts.

“The Arctic is one of the planet's most vulnerable ecosystems and home to unique wildlife .... Further oil and gas expansion would add pressure to these globally significant ecosystems, by increasing the risk of oil spills and leakages,” the lenders said in a letter organized by the Nordic Center for Sustainable Finance and sent to the Commission today.

The letter features more than 130 signatories from the financial and energy industries, trade unions, and individuals, including Germany’s former economy minister, now senior Arctic analyst at a Danish research facility.

“Further oil and gas expansion would add pressure to these globally significant ecosystems by increasing the risk of oil spills and leakages, which could cause irreversible environmental damage, while increased shipping, noise, and physical disturbance would further intensify the environmental stress on the region,” the letter also said.

The European Union has increased its imports of U.S. crude oil significantly lately to replace lost Middle Eastern supply, but, as Carlyle Group’s Jeff Currie recently warned, the U.S. oil, coming from inventories, will run out sooner rather than later, leaving the EU scrambling for supply. The EU has banned imports of Russian crude.

Norway, which is not a member of the EU, is campaigning for a change in attitude about Arctic oil drilling as it faces a decline in oil production due to natural depletion at its North Sea fields. The Nordic country is the biggest local supplier of the EU with oil and gas, as the UK decimates its oil and gas industry in favor of a transition to alternative energy and electrification.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

 

Mozambique Contests TotalEnergies' $2 Billion Cost from LNG Project Delay

The government of Mozambique disagrees with TotalEnergies’ estimate that the years-long delay in the Mozambique LNG project has cost it and its partners $2 billion in overruns, a source familiar with the matter told Bloomberg on Wednesday.

TotalEnergies and its partners in the $20-billion Mozambique LNG project had to suspend work and declare force majeure for several years amid serious concerns about security due to Islamist attacks near the site.

A recent audit report by UK-based consultancy Bayphase could not confirm the costs TotalEnergies claims to have incurred due to the delay. So Mozambique is not inclined to accept the $2-billion cost overrun estimate, according to Bloomberg’s anonymous source.

Mozambique has yet to approve an updated development plan for the massive LNG export project, which could transform the economy of one of Africa’s poorest countries and increase supply to the global LNG market in the medium to long term.

However, in order to approve the updated plan, Mozambique and the project developers need to be on the same page about costs. The government and the French supermajor continue discussions on the costs and the plan and they could still reach an agreement on how to proceed, Bloomberg’s source said.

After a five-year hiatus, in January 2026 TotalEnergies formally re-launched the Mozambique LNG project.

At the end of last year, TotalEnergies lifted the four-year-long force majeure on the Mozambique LNG project, which was stalled due to the precarious security situation near the site of the planned export facility. The project site is close to the town of Palma in the Cabo Delgado province, where Islamic State-affiliated militants were active for years.

In the spring of 2021, following Islamist militant attacks in towns close to the construction site, TotalEnergies declared force majeure and suspended works on the project. Mozambique LNG was Africa’s largest foreign investment when announced.

Due to the force majeure, the goal to achieve first LNG production has slipped, first to 2027, and later, to 2029.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

 

Dallas Fed Pres Says World Needs To Consume Less Oil And Gas

Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas President Lorie Logan says that the world may eventually have to reduce its consumption of oil and natural gas to bring volatile energy markets into a balance. Speaking at a closed-press conference, Logan emphasized the reality of physical supply constraints, noting that the current rate of oil and gas consumption is not sustainable. Logan expects energy markets to stabilize before too long, though it may force a downward adjustment in global consumption.

The Bank of Dallas chief did not provide near-term economic forecasts; however, she was one of three Fed policymakers who strongly objected to post-meeting statement language that hinted the Fed's next move would be an interest rate cut following the April 2026 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting. Logan argued that forward guidance should accurately reflect the policy outlook, and that because inflation risks were elevated, an interest rate hike was just as likely as an interest rate cut.

The dissent was heavily driven by surging energy and oil prices tied to the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. The three officials expressed deep concerns that higher energy prices would trickle down to consumer goods and transportation, risking prolonged inflation above the Fed's target inflation rate at 2.0%.

Logan spent a significant portion of her speech urging the central clearing of the Fed's own Treasury securities, warning that highly leveraged investors pose a risk as leveraged positions can unwind rapidly during sudden price or funding shocks.

Logan previously noted that U.S. oil producers are highly unlikely to ramp up production in the near term, pointing out that producers require prolonged, stable high prices to justify investing in the equipment needed for expansion. Global energy markets have been facing massive volatility due to an ongoing Middle East conflict, with the continued closure of the Strait of Hormuz taking ~14% of the world's oil supply offline resulting in a heavy drawing-down of global storage reserves.

By Alex Kimani for Oilprice.com

 

IEA Forecasts a $3.4 Trillion Energy Investment Boom

Global energy investment is set to jump to $3.4 trillion this year, the International Energy Agency said today, noting that the rise will be driven by countries’ efforts to address the second energy crisis in less than five years.

Of the global total, $2.2 trillion is expected to be spent on electricity, including grids, storage, nuclear, wind, solar, and efficiency, the agency said, with the balance of $1.2 trillion to be poured into oil and gas, as well as coal. Interestingly, the IEA sees crude oil investment specifically declining this year, for the third year in a row, to $500 billion, despite the price surge triggered by the war in the Middle East.

Natural gas investment, on the other hand, is seen surging to $330 billion, which would be the highest annual total investment in gas in ten years, the IEA said. Yet investments in solar power are expected to top this, reaching $365 billion in 2026. Total investments in what the IEA calls renewable power are estimated to reach $665 billion.

“We are in the midst of the largest energy security crisis the world has ever faced – and I believe this will reshape investment strategies globally, with parallels to the major changes the energy world witnessed after the oil shocks of the 1970s,” IEA’s secretary-general Fatih Birol said.

“We are already seeing intensified efforts by both producer and consumer countries to diversify trade routes and energy sources – such as advancing new pipelines and other supply infrastructure, on the one hand, and turning more to domestically available resources, on the other,” Birol added.

These efforts include a surge in interest in Canadian oil and gas, and plans by the United Arab Emirates’ national oil company ADNOC to double the capacity of its oil pipeline to Fujairah as soon as next year as a means of bypassing the Strait of Hormuz.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

FirstEnergy Seeks Ohio Rate Hikes Under New Three-Year Grid Plan

FirstEnergy’s Ohio electric utilities have filed a three-year rate plan with state regulators that would fund roughly $800 million annually in grid upgrades while gradually increasing customer bills to support reliability investments.

FirstEnergy’s Ohio subsidiaries - Ohio Edison, The Illuminating Company, and Toledo Edison - submitted their first Three-Year Rate Plan to the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, outlining proposed investments in electric infrastructure, vegetation management, and customer assistance programs.

Under the proposal, the company would invest an average of $800 million per year in poles, wires, and grid technologies designed to reduce outages and speed restoration times. Another $83 million annually would be directed toward tree trimming and vegetation management, one of the leading causes of outages across Ohio.

The filing comes as U.S. utilities accelerate spending on grid hardening and modernization amid rising electricity demand, aging infrastructure, and increasingly severe weather events. Multi-year rate plans have become more common across regulated utility markets because they provide greater visibility into capital spending and reduce the frequency of rate cases.

FirstEnergy said the proposal is also aimed at making customer bill increases more gradual and predictable. Residential customers using around 1,000 kilowatt-hours per month would see average annual bill increases ranging from 2.2% to 2.8% over the three-year period, depending on the utility territory.

The plan includes expanded customer assistance initiatives, including the creation of a new $4 million Energy Assistance Fund in 2029 through the consolidation of existing programs. The company also proposed a separate $1 million Emergency Energy Support Fund for customers facing disconnection or attempting to restore service.

Additional energy-efficiency and conservation programs would continue through the duration of the plan, including weatherization assistance, smart thermostat rebates, and programs aimed at helping customers better manage electricity consumption.

The proposed rate adjustments would apply only to the distribution portion of customer bills and would not affect electricity supply costs, which are determined separately by competitive suppliers.

 The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio will now review the filing and open the proposal to public comment before issuing a decision.

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com

 

LG Energy Solution and DTE Sign 6-GWh Michigan Battery Storage Deal

LG Energy Solution Vertech has signed an agreement with DTE Energy to supply 6 GWh of battery energy storage systems for eight projects in Michigan.

The deal includes the delivery of battery storage systems with 1.5 gigawatts of power capacity and 6 gigawatt-hours of energy storage capacity to DTE Energy over a two-year period.

The projects will use battery cells manufactured in Michigan and at other facilities in the United States and Canada. The companies said all eight projects will meet domestic content requirements.

The systems are designed to store power when generation exceeds demand and discharge electricity during peak demand periods, helping DTE reduce grid strain and improve reliability.

The deal comes as utilities across the United States are expanding battery storage to manage rising electricity demand, renewable generation, and grid volatility. In Michigan, DTE is also preparing for new load growth from data centers, including Oracle’s planned data center in Saline Township.

DTE said the battery systems funded through the Oracle contract would be sufficient on their own to meet the utility’s share of Michigan’s 2030 clean energy standard for battery storage.

The agreement also reinforces Michigan’s role in the North American battery supply chain, with LG Energy Solution tying the storage rollout to domestic manufacturing and job creation.

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com

 

High Freight Costs Force Asian Buyers to Cancel U.S. LPG Cargoes

The Middle East supply crunch has led to soaring freight rates to ship liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) to Asia from other regions, prompting some buyers to cancel U.S. cargoes due to the high shipping costs.

Buyers have so far canceled at least two cargoes of LPG, the main cooking fuel in India and a key petrochemicals feedstock in China, which were previously slated to depart from the U.S. Gulf Coast in June, sources with knowledge of the matter told Bloomberg on Thursday.

Buyers are also in discussions to cancel additional cargoes as the high freight costs eat into the margins of the LPG importers, according to Bloomberg’s sources.

Buyers in Asia, including top energy importers China and India, have turned to U.S. LPG to partially replace the supply lost from the Middle East.

LPG exports from the Persian Gulf supplied 92% of India’s and 26% of Southeast Asia’s imports in 2025, according to data by Vortexa.

With Middle Eastern exports now constrained, the U.S. is sending higher volumes of LPG, propane, and butane to Asia.

“As uncertainty persists over Middle East Gulf LPG production and exports, US LPG is likely to remain firmly positioned in the Asian markets at least through May – H1 June,” Anna Zhminko, associate market analyst at Vortexa, said at the end of March.

However, the soaring freight rates are now easing demand for U.S. LPG cargoes, according to Bloomberg’s sources.

Meanwhile, India, which uses LPG as its main cooking fuel and has felt shortages since the Iran war choked supplies at the Strait of Hormuz, seeks to boost its supply agreements. Earlier this month, India signed a strategic agreement with the United Arab Emirates to receive liquefied petroleum gas from the UAE.

In addition, India-bound LPG tankers have started to move through the Strait of Hormuz with transponders off on part of the route as dark activity rises among commercial shipping and a growing number of vessels exit the chokepoint.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

 

BHP Killed Its Own Hedge Against the Green Steel Shift

  • Leaked internal documents show BHP scrapped a beneficiation plant at its Jimblebar mine that its own analysis rated positively and projected to cut 1.7 million tonnes of scope-three emissions annually – the exact kind of higher-grade ore China’s decarbonizing steel sector and new DRI-based steelmaking technology increasingly requires.

  • The cancellation came as BHP also halted a $400 million solar project, deferred a $1.3 billion renewables plan to 2031, and purchased 62 new diesel trucks locking in fossil fuel use through at least the late 2030s – all while a 2023 internal memo by BHP Australia president Geraldine Slattery warned that slow emissions progress risked "reputational impacts" and threatened the company’s "licence to operate."

  • With Simandou’s high-grade exports ramping up, China’s steel ETS tightening toward absolute caps by 2027, and Australia’s iron ore revenue forecast already declining, BHP’s decision to delay the projects that would have positioned it for a greener steel market is a strategic question as much as a climate one.
blast furance in industrial plant

China just expanded its national emissions trading scheme to cover steel production. The EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism entered its definitive phase in January, putting a financial penalty on emissions-intensive steel. Simandou, the world's largest untapped deposit of high-grade iron ore, shipped its first cargoes to China in late 2025. The market for lower-grade ore is contracting. The market for ore that can feed cleaner steelmaking is growing.

BHP just canceled the project that would have positioned it for the second market. Instead, it bought 62 diesel trucks.

That's the core of what hundreds of leaked internal documents obtained by The Guardian and the Australian Broadcasting Corporation actually reveal. Yes, they expose the gap between BHP's public climate pledges and its internal decisions. But the more consequential story is commercial. The world's largest miner just walked away from its best hedge against the structural shift in its most important market.

The canceled facility was a beneficiation plant at Jimblebar in Western Australia's Pilbara region. The purpose was to upgrade BHP's iron ore to a higher grade – the kind that steelmakers need to produce lower-emissions steel. BHP's own analysis rated the project as having "excellent social value" and "well-aligned" to its climate targets. The projected return on investment was positive. And it would have cut scope-three emissions by 1.7 million tonnes annually, the equivalent of removing more than 350,000 cars from the road.

BHP shelved it in mid-2025. The reasoning cited internally: marginal economics, competition for capital. That calculus was made before China's steel ETS tightened, before the EU's carbon levy moved from paperwork to actual financial liability, and before Simandou – grading at 65% iron against Pilbara's typical 58-62% – started displacing lower-grade supply. The math may look different now.

The documents also show BHP paused a board-approved $400 million solar-and-battery project at Jimblebar, citing "cash prioritization requirements," and deferred a $1.3 billion plan for solar, wind and battery infrastructure to support electric trucks and trains – with no major spending now expected before 2031. To make up the gap, BHP purchased 62 new diesel trucks, locking in fossil fuel operations at the site through at least the late 2030s and potentially 2041. A 2023 memo from BHP Australia president Geraldine Slattery warned explicitly that "slow emissions reduction progress" in the Pilbara risked "reputational impacts" and undermined the company’s “licence to operate, sustain and grow.” The company’s response to that warning was to slow the reduction further.

A BHP spokesperson told Bloomberg the company had cut emissions 36% from its 2020 baseline by mid-2025, with 70% of total electricity now drawn from renewable sources, and that key decarbonization technologies for heavy equipment “are not yet ready to be deployed.” BHP did not respond to a separate request for comment.

BHP’s main Pilbara rival is taking a different approach. Fortescue is pushing ahead with electrification and renewables despite industry skepticism about its timelines, and is investing in green iron as a commercial product, not just a climate commitment. The divergence matters because this is no longer a story about reputation. Australia’s iron ore export revenue is forecast to drop from A$116 billion to A$97 billion by 2026-27. China is building direct reduction ironmaking capacity at scale, which requires higher-grade ore than Australia typically produces. Beijing has issued mandates requiring steelmakers to increase green energy use. Chinese demand for standard Pilbara ore has already peaked.

BHP has a 30% emissions reduction target for 2030 and a net-zero pledge for 2050. Those commitments are now backed by diesel trucks ordered to last until 2041 and a beneficiation plant that got canceled because the economics were deemed marginal. The internal documents make clear that BHP knew the reputational risk. What they also reveal, unintentionally, is the commercial one.

By Michael Kern for Oilprice.com