Tuesday, June 23, 2026

MUTUAL AID

Communication cues and signals are key to interspecies cooperation





Oregon State University





NEWPORT, Ore. – Even in the animal world, teamwork requires communication – just ask the fish, dolphins, birds and butterflies who rely on other species for help with food, protection from prey and even parasite removal.

A new review of the behaviors of animals who engage in interspecies cooperation, a type of behavior where animals from different species work together for mutual benefit, shows that the information exchanged through cues and signals play an important role in this unique kind of teamwork.  

Researchers reviewed a dozen documented types of interspecies cooperation, ranging from fish that clean other fishes to ants that guard butterfly larvae and humans who work with honeyguide birds to find bee nests. They found a striking commonality across many of these interactions.

“We found that communication through cues and signals plays an important role in this relatively rare interaction; this helps animals work together in the moment,” said Kyra Bankhead, a doctoral student at Oregon State University’s Marine Mammal Institute and one of the study’s co-authors.

“Animals can use sounds, movements or other signals to inform decisions about whether, when or how to cooperate with one another.”

The findings were just published in the journal Animal Behaviour. The work was led by Mauricio Cantor, a behavioral ecologist with OSU’s Marine Mammal Institute; Katie Dunkley of the University of Oxford; Dominic Cram of the University of East Anglia; and Jessica van der Wal of the University of Cape Town, South Africa.

Within-species cooperation is well-documented and widespread, but less is known about interspecies cooperation, where animals must communicate effectively across species boundaries while coordinating complementary actions.

“We often think of communication as something that happens between members of the same species, but many animals also exchange information with entirely different species to achieve shared goals,” said Cantor, who has extensively studied the cooperative fishing behavior of dolphins and humans.

“These interactions remind us that cooperation is not limited to families, social groups or even members of the same species,” he said. “Studying how animals communicate across species boundaries helps us understand how cooperation evolves, and more generally, how interactions between species help shape the natural world.”

Animals tend to cooperate across species boundaries in a few areas: cooperative foraging or hunting, where animals work together to increase success; food-for-cleaning services, where a cleaner such as a fish or shrimp removes parasites from the bodies of “client” species, which aids the health of the client; food-for-protection services, where food is exchanged for protection from predators; and shelter-for-protection, where shelter is provided in exchange for predator protection services.

This new review of these behaviors clarifies the vital role communication plays in these interactions at three stages: identifying and/or attracting partners; initiating cooperation; and maximizing benefits of cooperation through coordination and preventing harm by one partner to the other.

For example, when humans and dolphins work together to find and collect fish, a dolphin gives the human a visual cue that discloses where the fish school is, indicating the right time and place to cast a fishing net, which aids the dolphin in catching its own fish as the net traps the fish.

While the new paper offers additional insights into interspecies communication, additional study is needed to better understand this behavior, the researchers said. Those questions include: how do naturally occurring cues and signals in interspecies cooperation compare to those in trained cooperative interactions, such as between humans and trained dogs, birds or other animals? And to what degree are these cues and signals learned or passed down through genetics?

“We still have many unanswered questions about this behavior, and hope this work will spur further research,” Bankhead said.

 

New global study reveals link between local-scale species changes and global extinction risk






University of St. Andrews

fish assemblage 

image: 

An assembly of tropical fish 

view more 

Credit: University of St Andrews






New research from the University of St Andrews has shown that higher extinction risk is associated with higher frequency of decreasing local prevalence of species, in an analysis of one of the most comprehensive long-term databases ever created, BioTIME – a major tool to study biodiversity change also developed at the University of St Andrews. 

Published today (23 June) in Nature Communications, researchers from the School of Biology alongside a team of international partners, analysed over 60 000 populations of 2362 species across 978 marine and terrestrial assemblages. These populations have been sampled comprehensively over at least 20 years. 

An assemblage refers to a group of species from the same taxonomic group that co-occur within the same geographic location and time period, such as, a bird or fish assemblage. Analysing assemblage-level data allows us to systematically quantify change over time for many species and populations, and identify which ones might be faring better, i.e. assessing the “winners and losers” amidst ongoing global change. 

The analysis matched each population’s temporal prevalence trend with each species’ extinction risk from the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List. The picture that emerged was of complex links between the two factors, but a clear signal also emerged that decreasing temporal trends were associated with higher extinction risk compared to the other trends. Overall, fewer than 10% of populations showed either increasing or decreasing prevalence over time 

Joint lead Author, Dr Faye Moyes from the School of Biology at the University of St Andrews, said: “Our results highlight the importance of assemblage level monitoring in conservation strategies and shows the value of long-term time series such as those in BioTIME. “ 

Joint lead Author, Laura Antão, based at the University of Turku in Finland, added “We have assessed for the first time whether there is a consistent signal between population temporal trends and a species extinction risk status using assemblage monitoring data, rather than ‘dedicated’ species-level assessments. Finding a clear signal that decreasing prevalence is usually associated with a higher risk of extinction is a strong indication that we can detect impacts even for species that are not currently classified as at risk”. 

As global environmental change continues to accelerate, extinction risks are rising and  assemblages are being reorganised across taxa, biomes and realms. The team also revealed complex links between local temporal prevalence and extinction risk categories: some populations of threatened species could have stable or increasing trends, while non-threatened species could be decreasing. A better understanding of the processes that underpin such biodiversity changes is crucial for improving predictions and conservation strategies. 

Professor Anne Magurran, a senior author of the study, added: “These temporal trends could serve as early‑warning indicators and help target both new monitoring efforts and conservation actions. For instance, stable populations of at-risk species are of key conservation interest, while declining trends might highlight species that are missing from extinction risk assessments”. 

Professor Maria Dornelas added: “Because the task of assessing biodiversity change is gigantic, and we cannot travel in time to collect more data in the past, we want to use all information available. These two large biodiversity databases have only limited overlap and this study shows us how we can leverage both to expand our understanding of biodiversity change.” 

 

ENDS

 

Can use of popular weight loss medications reduce behaviors linked to violent crime?




Wiley





Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are widely prescribed for diabetes and obesity, but studies have found evidence that the medications may also influence behavior, such as supporting impulse control and reducing substance use and alcohol consumption by potentially interacting with the brain’s reward and stress systems. New research in Criminology adds to this growing evidence.

When investigators analyzed data from a 2025 nationally representative US survey involving 821 adults who had ever used GLP-1 medications, they found that while impulsivity and alcohol use were strongly associated with committing violent crime, these associations were significantly weaker among current GLP-1 RA users compared with former users. So even when a GLP-1 RA user drinks or acts impulsively, the situation is less likely to escalate into engaging in violent criminality. More thorough analyses showed that this finding was especially consistent related to impulsivity, but less so with alcohol use.

The findings suggest that GLP-1 RAs may lessen the extent to which certain established risk factors translate into violent behavior.

“As GLP-1 medications become increasingly widespread, understanding their broader behavioral effects becomes an important public health and criminological question that requires careful study,” said corresponding author Daniel C. Semenza, PhD, of Rutgers University.

URL upon publication: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-9125.70058

 

Additional Information
NOTE:
The information contained in this release is protected by copyright. Please include journal attribution in all coverage. For more information or to obtain a PDF of any study, please contact: Sara Henning-Stout, newsroom@wiley.com.

About the Journal
Criminology is devoted to the study of crime and deviant behavior. Interdisciplinary in scope, the journal publishes articles that advance the theoretical and research agenda of criminology and criminal justice.

About Wiley      
Wiley is a global leader in authoritative content and research intelligence for the advancement of scientific discovery, innovation, and learning. With more than 200 years at the center of the scholarly ecosystem, Wiley combines trusted publishing heritage with AI-powered platforms to transform how knowledge is discovered, accessed, and applied. From individual researchers and students to Fortune 500 R&D teams, Wiley enables the transformation of scientific breakthroughs into real-world impact. From knowledge to impact—Wiley is redefining what's possible in science and learning. Visit us at Wiley.com and Investors.Wiley.com. Follow us on Facebook, X, LinkedIn and Instagram.