Saturday, January 08, 2022

When Canada’s Housing Bubble Pops, It Will Cause Misery and Ruin

The price of Canadian homes has increased faster than those of any other member of the OECD. Rising interest rates now threaten to bring the market crashing down, destroying the lives of millions in the process
.
In the last two decades, home prices have gone up by 375 percent in Canada. (Brett Gundlock/Bloomberg

BYJOHN CLARKE
JACOBIN
01.06.2022

As recently as ten years ago property speculators were a minority amongst Ontario’s home buyers. Investors now surpass first-time buyers as well as the total number of people moving between homes. According to a recent report, between January and August of last year investors were responsible for a quarter of house purchases in the province.

These speculative investments are, of course, driving up prices. They are also creating major problems for the economy as a whole because the rising cost of housing has increased the amount of private debt held by individuals. Whilst interest rates have remained low this debt has been sustainable. The possibility of hikes now threatens to bring Canada’s housing market crashing down.
A Disaster Waiting to Happen

The Bank of Canada is warning that a “frenzy of real estate investment,” combined with impossibly high levels of household debt, “could destabilize the economy as rates start to rise.” The central bank’s deputy governor Paul Beaudry suggests that a reckoning is fast approaching because the Bank of Canada now plans to increase interest rates. Beaudry warns that

A key concern here is that financially stretched households have little breathing room to absorb any disruption to their income. A job loss could force many to drastically cut their spending to keep servicing their debt.

In the last two decades, home prices have gone up by 375 percent in Canada. These increases have been especially marked in in Toronto and Vancouver, where prices have swelled by 450 and 490 percent respectively. This rise far outstrips any other developed markets in the world. In recent years, an incredible gulf has opened between house prices and real income. Even high-level investment bankers such as David Doyle, head of North American Strategy & Economics at Macquarie Group, have rung alarm bells. “Prices,” according to Doyle, “are totally disconnected from the fundamentals.”

The easiest way to appreciate how serious things have become is to compare the situation in Canada with that of the United States. The United States’ sub-prime mortgage crisis was deeply linked to the 2008 financial crash and the Great Recession it caused. Canada, however, didn’t experience the same kind of forced “correction” as its North American neighbor. The reckless inflation of its profit driven housing bubble has continued unabated. Whilst US investors on the whole took stock of the enormity of 2008 and stopped viewing housing as a safe investment, their Canadian counterparts remained bullish, continuing to fuel a debt driven housing market.

In February, a study of “the world’s least affordable housing markets” showed how Canada’s speculative bubble has made Toronto and Vancouver one of the world’s frontrunners when it comes to unaffordable housing. Using a scale in which a rating of over 5.1 is “severely unaffordable,” Toronto, with a score of 8.6, beat out London and San Francisco. Vancouver at a staggering 11.9, is entirely off the chart. The US Federal Reserve’s “Exuberance Index” has shown that, as one media report puts it, “Canadian home prices have been in bubble territory for 6 years without a correction.”
Human Costs

The cause of this instability is the commodification of housing, and unimpeded it will lead to further indebtedness on the part of private buyers and threaten millions with economic dislocation. It also drives up rents, forces precarious housing on many, and forces growing numbers of people into homelessness. The Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) has produced data showing that “rents are going up, pandemic or not.”

Between October 2018 and October 2019, average rents for a two bedroom unit in Canada increased at five times the general rate of inflation. The fact that the incomes of the poorest Canadians have remained stagnant during this period has not affected the pace at which prices have risen. Ontario’s social assistance benefits remain frozen despite housing costs shooting up.


Predictably, the threat of eviction hangs over the heads of a huge number of tenants. The Globe recently reported that in Vancouver, the Canadian epicenter of unaffordable housing, 10.5 percent of renter households moved from their previous home because they were evicted. The figures for Toronto and Montreal are 5.8 and 4.2 respectively.

When landlords want to evict tenants, the legal system and its enforcers are only too ready to provide support. During the Easter holidays, landlords removed a Toronto father and his two young children from their home with the assistance of dozens of police officers who stormed into his apartment on Good Friday. This was a day before the Ontario government enacted a province-wide shutdown. As the tenant put it, “there’s no justification to sending twenty-six cruisers to evict a single peaceful man, and his two children. That is inhumane.”

As you would expect, the rise in housing prices has led to a rise in homelessness. In major cities, local authorities, instead of working toward meaningful solutions, have decided to sweep the problem under the rug. Toronto has seen a major increase in homeless encampments, often set up in public parks. The pandemic has increased the visibility of urban destitution. Cities have responded by increasingly resorting to brutal police operations to clear encampments.

In the summer, police arrested twenty-six people during skirmishes between protester and law enforcement. The arrests followed a police operation to drive homeless people out of a Toronto park. Similar methods have been employed in other Canadian cities, including a particularly ugly police attack in Halifax. According to a local housing advocate, “these people had nowhere to go, despite the doublespeak that we’re hearing from the city that everyone has options.” Nevertheless, City Hall is determined that the post-pandemic “recovery” won’t include people who have been priced out of housing.

At the start of the 1990s, Canada’s governments slashed funding for social housing and opened the housing market up to complete domination by private interests. Today, as housing prices and rents skyrocket, and homeless shelters overflow, mainstream public policy is entirely reconciled to the idea that housing must be a commodity.

The Trudeau government has recently made a lot of noise about the need for a housing fix, but while the crisis spins out of control, it appears that the Liberal’s solutions amount to little more than empty talk. In Toronto, the largest city in the country, both left and right members of City Council are wedded to the pro-property developer position that including some “affordable” units in their reckless buildout of upscale housing is a reasonable solution to the crisis.
Real Solutions

It’s clear that only a real challenge to the commodification of housing can make a meaningful difference in this situation. In the wake of the dislocations and hardships that were triggered by the pandemic, many politicians have paid lip service to the need for a “just recovery.” The reality, however, is that any gains that working people make during the period ahead will have to be fought for.

The struggle for housing will require a massive expansion of public housing. The call for public housing will have to be clearly articulated and very specific local demands will have to be put forward. However, to press governments into public housing development, mass social action will be required.

The breakthrough in the fight for union rights in North America took place in the 1930s, when workers occupied the factories in order to press their demands. Under present conditions, a comparable method of advancing the struggle for housing is possible. As investors take over the housing market, it is estimated that 1.3 million homes are sitting empty in Canada.

According to a Toronto lifestyle magazine, the city “has more construction cranes than any city in North America with roughly two thirds of them working on condos.” This construction represents an astonishing market failure — a staggering sixty-five thousand condo units in the city are thought to be presently unoccupied, serving no other purpose than speculative investment.

The housing crisis requires major social mobilization. The occupation of these empty homes by all the people who the market has displaced would take the challenge of housing beyond the limits of abstract debate and into the realms of real action. It would be a real, grassroots “build back better” initiative.

Canada’s housing market is sick and grossly distorted. It causes tenants to live in constant fear of eviction and ensures that the unhoused sleep on the streets. The subordination of housing needs to profit has created a dangerous bubble that threatens an economic catastrophe. An effective “correction” to this situation could begin with a movement of people on the streets who insist that housing is a human right.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
John Clarke got involved in anti-poverty organizing in London, Ontario, in the 1980s and was an organizer with Ontario Coalition Against Poverty (OCAP) for almost thirty years. Presently, he is the Packer Visitor in Social Justice at Toronto’s York University.

Opinion: We’re going to hear a lot more about the financialization of housing this year


Professor Emeritus John Belleck says people should be prepared to hear more about the financialization of housing in 2022.Fred Lum/

John Belleck is Professor Emeritus of Geography and Environment at Fraser Valley University.

In his November update on the financial system’s key vulnerabilities and risks, the Bank of Canada deputy governor focused almost exclusively on the Canadian housing market.

in the middle trends highlighted There was a “sudden influx of investors into the housing market” by Paul Beaudry. [which] That likely contributed to the rapid price growth we saw earlier this year. Data provided by TransUnion Canada shows that the number of “investor” buyers doubled in 2021 compared to 2020. Granthshala and Mail columnist Rob Carrick used the term “financialization of housing” to describe this growing trend.

Be prepared to hear a lot more about the financialization of housing in 2022. I predict the term is about to make the leap from academia, where it has spread since the financial meltdown, to the world of urban theory critical among nerds like me. 2007, in popular colloquialism. As an example, the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation recently announced the funding of a Finance of Housing Solutions Lab To examine the phenomenon and its implications for housing affordability. Recent mandate letter Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to Housing Minister Ahmed Hussein does not use the term, but asks them to look for ways to prevent excessive returns on investment properties.

The literature on the financialization of housing draws attention to the growing importance of the housing sector as a major source of growth within the global economy, especially as it occurred in the early decades of the 21st century. In general terms, housing finance refers to the expanded role that housing plays as a market commodity, as distinct from its provision of shelter. As a commodity with a solid track record as an economic asset, housing is attractive to investors of all stripes. The result is a vicious cycle of increased demand, and ultimately greater mortgage indebtedness by those who simply need a place to live.

It is useful to think of residence as providing two kinds of value: use and exchange. Use value, as the name implies, refers to a structure’s shelter and local characteristics to its occupants, while exchange value refers to the market value of said structures. These two characteristics of housing have always existed in an uneasy relationship and poses an important question to Canadian federal public policy: if a roof over our heads is necessary for survival, should these roofs be publicly required by the public? Shouldn’t it be distributed instead left to the vagaries of a private market?

Canada’s housing market was at a crossroads when this question was investigated by the Conservative government of RB Bennett in the Dirty Thirties. His Special Committee on Housing met for two months in 1935 to prepare a response to the widely documented state of the country’s housing stock. The committee heard from a wide variety of interests, including reformers, construction councils and financial institutions. The result was the Dominion Housing Act (DHA), which was presented as an attempt to encourage employment in the construction trades rather than explicitly addressing the housing problem.

While the DHA proved ineffective on either, it unveiled an innovation that would define the practice of residential consumption for most Canadian households in the following years: the modern institutional mortgage. More specifically, it meant longer-term (20-year) mortgage amortization and higher (80 percent) loan-to-value ratios. Most importantly, DHA came with the support of Mortgage Ottawa. In practice, this meant extending federal aid from DHA funds to lenders in the event of a foreclosure. This was replaced by the current program of mortgage insurance in 1954. In addition, DHA loans were actually combined loans – institutional lenders provided 60 percent and Ottawa provided 20 percent.

Mortgage home ownership is the foundation upon which Canada has built its housing market. According to the 2016 census, nearly two-thirds of Canadian households were homeowners, and most of these were paying off a mortgage. Canadians owe $1.73 trillion in mortgage debt as of June 2021, according to Statistics Canada, and this figure has been rising in record amounts during the pandemic.

It is a bit hypothetical to suggest that it need not change as such – although alternative housing futures were also on the table in 1935. One of the most interesting was written by Humphrey Carver on behalf of the League for Social Reconstruction, of the Commonwealth Association, a forerunner of the NDP. Mr Carver’s proposal called for a national public housing program and slum clearance. The road not taken could result in an expanded role for non-market housing in Canada – perhaps something resembling a European model, where home ownership rates are lower in some countries and cooperative housing is more widespread.

Ottawa’s resistance to these voices for reform was evident from the start, largely because of the cost of the proposals. But more important was the warm relationship that existed between Ottawa and the lending industry. The terms of the DHA were drawn up by the Deputy Finance Minister, WC Clark, and the Lending Industry (represented by Dominion Mortgage and Investment Association attorney Thomas D’Arcy Leonard) and submitted to the Housing Committee. Completion of the hearing of the committee.

Mortgage innovations introduced in 1935 survived for almost 90 years, with only minor tinkering. Recent efforts at Disrupt have focused on efficiency at the retail level, including accelerating lending decisions with the application of artificial intelligence and algorithms, rather than the fundamental change being offered.

It should come as no surprise that the finance sector – and, by extension, the Canadian state – has a lot of skin in the game. In the words of the Belgian scholar Manuel Albers, “increasingly, mortgaged home ownership is intended to keep the financial markets running, not to be facilitated by those markets.” This will continue to be a major obstacle to changing the housing model in Canada.

QUEBEC
Political independence is ‘essential’ for pensions, says top CDPQ manager
January 7, 2022


Pension plans must be free to make decisions without political interference at a time when governments are looking to tap retirement pots to meet economic goals, according to a top investor at one of Canada’s largest pension funds.

Maxime Aucoin, head of total portfolio at C$390bn ($306bn) Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec (CDPQ), said in an interview that it was “essential” for pension plans to retain their independence on how they both allocate funds and pay key staff.

CDPQ, which manages some public pension plans as well as insurance plans, operates independently from the government. It has a dual mandate to maximise returns for more than 6m members while also contributing to Quebec’s economy, providing an example of how pensions must balance sometimes competing priorities.

The plan holds C$68bn of listed and private assets in the province and is the second-biggest shareholder in aviation company and regional champion Bombardier.

Aucoin told the Financial Times that the fund’s focus on governance provided it with “relative independence from the political sphere”. He added that the “beneficiaries of your pension plan are not the government”.

Like many other mega-sized global retirement funds, CDPQ has in recent years reduced its holdings in Canada in preference to diversifying investments across global markets with different growth profiles, with the Asia-Pacific region an area of particular focus.

However, Moody’s cautioned in its review of CDPQ in June that in a weaker economy, the plan could come under political pressure to support Québec “in a way that eroded its ability to achieve the optimal return for depositors”.

CDPQ is far from alone in facing these risks, according to analysts and industry participants.

Blake Hutcheson, chief executive and president of Omers, the C$114bn Toronto-based public pension fund, told the FT “when I look around the world a lot of pension plans are instruments of the government”. Hutcheson also highlighted the importance of independence from political pressure, saying it was something that made many Canadian pension pensions “out-punch our weight class”.

The comments follow a warning from the Paris-based OECD watchdog that the coronavirus pandemic has led to increased political pressures on pension funds.

“Given budget constraints, some governments are calling on private institutional investors, such as pension funds, to play a bigger role in financing the economic recovery,” said Stéphanie Payet, pension analyst with the OECD.

Australia’s government has urged superannuation funds to help cushion the blow from the coronavirus crisis by funding company bailouts.

The UK government last year called for workplace pension schemes, which oversee more than £1tn in assets, to invest more in UK infrastructure projects and early-stage companies to help the country “build back better”.

In June 2021, Alok Sharma, president of COP26, the climate change conference, challenged global pension funds — with a total $47tn under management — to play a leading role in creating a “clean, green and prosperous future”.

“Although there may be room for investing further in the economic recovery, there is a risk that investing domestically, in selected sectors, or in complex financial products may deliver poor value for members, or worse than they otherwise would have gotten from other investments,” the OECD’s Payet said.

Source: Financial Times

CRICKET UPSET

Bangladesh seal historic upset to end New Zealand’s unbeaten home Test run

  • First Test: Bangladesh (458 & 42-2) beat NZ (328 & 169) by 8 wkts
  • Bangladesh earn their first-ever Test win over New Zealand
Mominul Haque and Mushfiqur Rahim celebrate after securing an eight-wicket win at Mount Maunganui. Photograph: Michael Bradley/AFP/Getty Images
Reuters and 
Wed 5 Jan 2022

Bangladesh have ended New Zealand’s 17-match unbeaten run on home soil with a stunning eight-wicket victory at Mount Maunganui.

The world Test champions were dismissed for 169 in their second innings, with Bangladesh knocking off the 40 runs required for victory for the loss of two wickets as the tourists beat New Zealand in a Test match for the first time.

The hosts had begun day five on 147 for 5, a slender lead of 17 runs, and were quickly on the back foot as the seamer Ebadot Hossain clean-bowled Ross Taylor for 40, then removed Kyle Jamieson for a duck in his first two overs. Taskin Ahmed chipped in with the wicket of the all-rounder Rachin Ravindra for 16.

The Black Caps were rocking on 160 for 8 and Bangladesh finished them off, Taskin removing Tim Southee’s middle stump before Trent Boult departed for eight as he holed out in the deep. There was a brief early wobble for the tourists when Shadman Islam was caught behind for three off Southee’s bowling.

Najmul Hossain Shanto and the captain, Mominul Haque, steadied the ship and by the time Najmul was caught smartly by Taylor for 17, the finish line was in sight. Mominul, who scored 13 not out, and the experienced Mushfiqur Rahim (unbeaten on five) ushered Bangladesh to their historic triumph.

Ebadot Hossain leaves the field with the ball after taking six wickets for 46 runs. Photograph: Michael Bradley/AFP/Getty Images

Ebadot finished with second-innings figures of 6 for 46, his early wickets key to forcing a result. The former volleyball player, who is still employed by the Bangladesh Air Force, was named player of the match. “It’s a long journey, volleyball to cricket … I’m enjoying cricket now,” he said after the game.

In the first innings, New Zealand had posted an impressive 328, Devon Conway top-scoring with 122, but they found themselves 130 runs behind at halfway. Bangladesh made 458 in response, with four players – Mominul (88), Liton Das (86), Mahmudul Hasan Joy (78) and Najmul (64) – reaching half-centuries.

Bangladesh’s first win in any format of the game in New Zealand gives them a 1-0 lead in the two-match series, with the second Test starting in Christchurch on Sunday. The hosts will be eager to bounce back from their first home Test defeat since South Africa won at Wellington in March 2017.

Cricket: Bangladesh boss' 

20-year wait for a win in 

New Zealand

Bangladesh beat the Black Caps by eight wickets in Mt Maunganui. Photo / Photosport

By 
Niall Anderson

Twenty-one years ago, Khaled Mahmud was part of the first Bangladesh team to visit New Zealand.

They played two tests, losing both by an innings – a result that became familiar for the tourists on their travels.

A former captain of the team, Mahmud then moved into coaching, and now holds the title of Bangladesh team director, watching on as his team produced a few excellent results at home but continued to struggle away, especially in their 32 consecutive defeats in New Zealand.

But, two decades after he first set foot on New Zealand soil, his nation has finally triumphed, and he was on hand to celebrate.

"It's a dream come true," Mahmud told Spark Sport.

"We have been working very hard coming into this tour – it's not a very experienced side, we have a lot of youngsters in the team, but the boys did the trick."

History was against Bangladesh, but so was the present. The Black Caps were on a record unbeaten run at home, had won the World Test Championship and even managed to snag a draw in India.

Bangladesh, on the other hand, had been smashed at home by Pakistan in two tests, and their only test victories since 2018 had come against Zimbabwe.

However, Mahmud revealed that their time in MIQ in Christchurch led to some hard truths, and hard work.

"We didn't play well against Pakistan. We came here, spent time in quarantine, and the one thing I spoke to the team was that somebody has to raise their hand and say 'yes, we can do it'. The boys worked really hard, I think coming here early helped us a lot to practice in these conditions and know what is coming when we are batting and where we need to bowl.

"The execution was perfect, and the patience – we all said 'we have to hang on here, we have to bat long here' – we had to fight because we knew the New Zealand boys are very tough disciplined bowlers."

Conversations were also had with fast bowler Ebadot Hossain, who turned a loose first-innings performance into a breakout display in the second innings, taking 6-46.

"In the first innings he was not that disciplined with his bowling – he was bowling a lot of half-volleys, a lot of short deliveries, wide of off-stump. He wants to bowl back of a length but we talked to him and said you can't bowl that length, you have to bowl a fuller length, where you can trouble the batsmen. He did it perfectly."

Mahmud acknowledged some things went Bangladesh's way, but few would begrudge them their famous victory.

"The toss was very important for us, we were lucky to win the toss and in the first hour we were able to get Tom Latham early, that helped us a lot and the confidence built up from there.

"It's always challenging playing New Zealand but I'm very happy the way the boys played. I feel very proud."



BEYOND A BOUNDARY | Pandaemonium (kenanmalik.com)

This year marks the 50th anniversary of CLR James’ wonderful, groundbreaking work Beyond a Boundary. To call it a book about cricket is a bit like calling cricket a ‘game’. Beyond a Boundary blends politics and memoir, history and journalism, biography and reportage, in a manner that transcends literary, sporting and political boundaries. V S Naipaul, not a man given to offering easy praise, described it as ‘one of the finest and most finished books to come out of the West Indies’. John Arlott, that most wonderful of cricket commentators, wrote of Beyond a Boundary, that it was ‘a book so outstanding as to compel any reviewer to check his adjectives several times before he describes it and, since he is likely to be dealing in superlatives, to measure them carefully to avoid over-praise – which this book does not need’.

The lessons of cricket | SocialistWorker.org
https://socialistworker.org/2014/04/16/the-lessons-of-cricket
2014-04-16 · The lessons of cricket April 16, 2014 In addition to its lessons about sports, C.L.R. James’ memoir about cricket explains a lot about the political development of the great revolutionary, writes...

CLR James Cricket Research Centre | The University of …
https://cavehill.uwi.edu/cricketresearchcentre/research-resources.aspx
The CLR James Cricket Research Centre houses a collection of artifacts, neck ties, hats and items of cricket uniforms, donated by Mr. Henderson Springer, a former Barbados cricketer

The Caribbean, Cricket and C.L.R. James | NACLA
https://nacla.org/article/caribbean-cricket-and-clr-james
There was no finer, more eloquent scribe of the rise of West Indian cricket culture to global dominance in the age of nation building than C.L.R. James. His monumental 1963 text, 
Beyond a Boundary
Cosmic monster star erupted with the force of 1 billion Suns
Joshua Hawkins 
BGR
© Provided by BGR luminous blue variable

Researchers captured the eruption of a neutron star in 2021 and determined that it produced the same amount of energy our Sun would generate over 100,000 years. Even more intriguing is that the star produced that amount of energy in just a tenth of a second. Furthermore, scientists believe that the eruption could have been caused by starquakes.

Star eruptions like this could be caused by starquakes
]
© Provided by BGR Red dwarf star in space

The neutron star that researchers watched is in the Sculptor Galaxy, roughly 13 million light-years from Earth. The researchers who ran the new study on the star said that it’s a “true cosmic monster” in a statement (via LiveScience). The eruption, Victor Reglero, the study’s co-author, says was almost like the star shouting out into space with the force “of a billion suns”. The full study on this most recent eruption was published in a December edition of the journal Nature.

One of the most interesting things about this new eruption isn’t how much force the star sent out, though. Instead, it’s the possible cause that researchers believe could be behind eruptions of this sort. According to the study, scientists suspect that the eruptions that we see in neutron stars like this are caused by something called starquakes.

These quakes disrupt the star’s outer layer, allowing for flares to break through the surface of the star. It’s an intriguing proposition and one that researchers are still working to prove as fact. If true, though, it could explain a lot about how stars come to release such large bursts of energy. It could also help scientists better understand how the stress in stars builds.

What are neutron stars and how are they born?

© Provided by BGR supernova

Neutron stars are born when a star collapses. This creates a supernova, which leaves behind a massive amount of energy. As the star dies, the electrons and protons in its core become crushed.

This creates a compressed mass of solar energy. Combine that with gravity and the rotation of high-speed, powerful magnetic rotations, and a neutron star is born. Furthermore, researchers call these stars magnetar stars. NASA says that neutron stars are usually 1.3 to 2.5 solar masses. One solar mass is the same mass as our Sun, roughly the mass of 330,000 Earths. Most neutron stars we've discovered are only 12 miles in diameter. Because these small spaces contain so much energy, it makes sense that starquakes could help release that energy into the flares we’ve witnessed in the past.

Because so much energy is packed into such a tiny space, magnetar stars are often 1,000 times stronger than other neutron stars. This also makes them some of the most powerful magnetic objects in the universe. In fact, they’re so powerful, our Sun pales in comparison to the energy they contain. Considering we just now figured out how to touch the Sun’s atmosphere, it could be years before we’re able to fully study these stars up close and personal.

So far, researchers have only identified around 30 magnetar stars out of the 3,000 neutron stars that we know about. This latest flare, though, is the most distant flare that we’ve detected to date. As scientists dig deeper into these stars, it will be interesting to see if starquakes really are the cause of such flares.

The post Cosmic monster star erupted with the force of 1 billion Suns appeared first on BGR.

The evolutionary origins of why you're programmed to love sugar

berry picking
Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

The sweetness of sugar is one of life's great pleasures. People's love for sweet is so visceral, food companies lure consumers to their products by adding sugar to almost everything they make: yogurt, ketchup, fruit snacks, breakfast cereals and even supposed health foods like granola bars.

Schoolchildren learn as early as kindergarten that sweet treats belong in the smallest tip of the food pyramid, and adults learn from the media about sugar's role in unwanted weight gain. It's hard to imagine a greater disconnect between a powerful attraction to something and a rational disdain for it. How did people end up in this predicament?

I'm an anthropologist who studies the evolution of taste perception. I believe insights into our species' evolutionary history can provide important clues about why it's so hard to say no to sweet.

Sweet taste detection

A fundamental challenge for our ancient ancestors was getting enough to eat.

The basic activities of day-to-day life, such as raising the young, finding shelter and securing enough foodall required energy in the form of calories. Individuals more proficient at garnering calories tended to be more successful at all these tasks. They survived longer and had more surviving children—they had greater fitness, in evolutionary terms.

One contributor to success was how good they were at foraging. Being able to detect sweet things—sugars—could give someone a big leg up.

In nature, sweetness signals the presence of sugars, an excellent source of calories. So foragers able to perceive sweetness could detect whether  was present in potential foods, especially plants, and how much.

This ability allowed them to assess calorie content with a quick taste before investing a lot of effort in gathering, processing and eating the items. Detecting sweetness helped  gather plenty of calories with less effort. Rather than browsing randomly, they could target their efforts, improving their evolutionary success.

Sweet taste genes

Evidence of sugar detection's vital importance can be found at the most fundamental level of biology, the gene. Your ability to perceive sweetness isn't incidental; it is etched in your body's genetic blueprints. Here's how this sense works.

Sweet perception begins in taste buds, clusters of cells nestled barely beneath the surface of the tongue. They're exposed to the inside of the mouth via small openings called taste pores.

Different subtypes of cells within  are each responsive to a particular taste quality: sour, salty, savory, bitter or sweet. The subtypes produce receptor proteins corresponding to their taste qualities, which sense the chemical makeup of foods as they pass by in the mouth.

One subtype produces bitter receptor proteins, which respond to toxic substances. Another produces savory (also called umami) receptor proteins, which sense amino acids, the building blocks of proteins. Sweet-detecting cells produce a receptor protein called TAS1R2/3, which detects sugars. When it does, it sends a neural signal to the brain for processing. This message is how you perceive the sweetness in a food you've eaten.

Even newborns have a preference for sweet and an aversion to bitter.

Genes encode the instructions for how to make every protein in the body. The sugar-detecting receptor protein TAS1R2/3 is encoded by a pair of genes on chromosome 1 of the human genome, conveniently named TAS1R2 and TAS1R3.

Comparisons with other species reveal just how deeply sweet perception is embedded in human beings. The TAS1R2 and TAS1R3 genes aren't only found in humansmost other vertebrates have them, too. They're found in monkeys, cattle, rodents, dogs, bats, lizards, pandas, fish and myriad other animals. The two genes have been in place for hundreds of millions of years of evolution, ready for the first human species to inherit.

Geneticists have long known that genes with important functions are kept intact by natural selection, while genes without a vital job tend to decay and sometimes disappear completely as species evolve. Scientists think about this as the use-it-or-lose-it theory of evolutionary genetics. The presence of the TAS1R1 and TAS2R2 genes across so many species testifies to the advantages sweet taste has provided for eons.

The use-it-or-lose-it theory also explains the remarkable discovery that animal species that don't encounter sugars in their typical diets have lost their ability to perceive it. For example, many carnivores, who benefit little from perceiving sugars, harbor only broken-down relics of TAS1R2.

Sweet taste liking

The body's sensory systems detect myriad aspects of the environment, from light to heat to smell, but we aren't attracted to all of them the way we are to sweetness.

A perfect example is another taste, bitterness. Unlike sweet receptors, which detect desirable substances in foods, bitter receptors detect undesirable ones: toxins. And the brain responds appropriately. While sweet taste tells you to keep eating, bitter taste tells you to spit things out. This makes evolutionary sense.

So while your tongue detects tastes, it is your brain that decides how you should respond. If responses to a particular sensation are consistently advantageous across generations, natural selection fixes them in place and they become instincts.

Such is the case with bitter . Newborns don't need to be taught to dislike bitterness—they reject it instinctively. The opposite holds for sugars. Experiment after experiment finds the same thing: People are attracted to sugar from the moment they're born. These responses can be shaped by later learning, but they remain at the core of human behavior.

Sweetness in humans' future

Anyone who decides they want to reduce their sugar consumption is up against millions of years of evolutionary pressure to find and consume it. People in the developed world now live in an environment where society produces more sweet, refined sugars than can possibly be eaten. There is a destructive mismatch between the evolved drive to consume sugar, current access to it and the human body's responses to it. In a way, we are victims of our own success.

The attraction to sweetness is so relentless that it has been called an addiction comparable to nicotine dependence—itself notoriously difficult to overcome.

I believe it is worse than that. From a physiological standpoint, nicotine is an unwanted outsider to our bodies. People desire it because it plays tricks on the brain. In contrast, the desire for sugar has been in place and genetically encoded for eons because it provided fundamental fitness advantages, the ultimate evolutionary currency.

Sugar isn't tricking you; you are responding precisely as programmed by natural selection.

Sickly sweet or just right? How genes control your taste for sugar
Provided by The Conversation 
ONTARIO\ RING OF FIRE
Rail corridor will lead to power grid


Five remote First Nations currently relying on diesel-powered generators could be connected to the provincial power grid if an electrified rail corridor is installed to haul ore out of Northern Ontario’s Ring of Fire mineral belt.

Project proponent KWG Resources said this week that connecting the Marten Falls, Webequie, Eabematoong, Neskantaga and Nibinamik communities to the Ontario power grid, along with related optical fiber networks, “would eliminate diesel-generation except in outage emergencies.”

The costs of the “electrification plan” have been pegged at $960 million for the main corridor, and $788 million for infrastructure required to connect the First Nations to the grid.

Toronto-based KWG said in a news release that $1.5 billion toward the capital costs could come from government sources.

The specialized, 330-kllometre rail line for hauling ore would cost an additional US$657 million, the company said in an earlier news release.

KWG has long argued that hauling chromite, nickel and other Ring of Fire metals by rail would be cheaper in the long run, and more environmentally-friendly, than the use of diesel-powered trucks.

Still, proposals for all-weather access roads into the Ring of Fire are currently being subject to environmental reviews overseen by Webequie and Marten Falls.

Timelines for approvals and construction of both the rail and road proposals have yet to be set.

KWG controls the Black Horse chromite deposit located in the Ring of Fire, about 550 kilometres north-east of Thunder Bay. Chromite is a main ingredient in stainless steel.

Last month, Australia’s Wyloo Metals won a bidding war for control of Noront Resources, which also has substantial chromite and nickel deposits in the remote mineral belt.

Carl Clutchey, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter, The Chronicle-Journal