Tuesday, October 31, 2023

Kenyans urge King Charles III to formally apologize for colonial-era abuses
2023/10/30
King Charles III speaks to guests, during a reception at Buckingham Palace for overseas guests attending his coronation, on Friday, May 5, 2023, in London. - Jacob King/WPA Pool/Getty Images North America/TNS

King Charles III didn’t receive the warmest of welcomes when he arrived in Kenya for a four-day state visit on Monday.

Calls are growing for the British monarch to make a heartfelt apology for colonial era abuses as he and Queen Camilla tour the east African country.

The tour is the first to a Commonwealth country since he succeeded his late mother, Queen Elizabeth, who died in September after a seven-decade reign.

Buckingham Palace announced that King Charles would “acknowledge the more painful aspects of the U.K. and Kenya’s shared history,” which includes the bloody Mau Mau rebellion of the 1950s.

He planned to dedicate some of the time to “deepen his understanding of the wrongs suffered in this period by the people of Kenya,” according to the palace statement.

Though Britain has given around $25 million in compensation in 2013 to Kenya, it still has not apologized for “the torture and other forms of ill-treatment at the hands of the colonial administration” — as then-Foreign Secretary William Hague stated. “The British government sincerely regrets that these abuses took place and that they marred Kenya’s progress to independence. Torture and ill-treatment are abhorrent violations of human dignity which we unreservedly condemn.”

Regarded as one of the most significant steps towards Kenya gaining freedom from British rule, armed Mau Mau groups revolted against European settlers in the 1950s. Colonial authorities imposed a state of emergency in response leaving about 10,000 people — mainly from the Kikuyu tribe— dead during the crackdown.

Some Kenyans have been outspoken in urging King Charles to go one step further and say sorry in a more formal way.

“Firstly, King Charles III, you need to stop choking on those two words, ‘I apologize.’ Just cough them up,” Harvard University professor and author Caroline Elkins wrote in an opinion piece for The Guardian on Sunday.

“They will probably trigger all sorts of liability issues for you and your government, but at last count, the monarchy is worth over £20 billion, so you could give several quid – some of which were stolen from or earned on the backs of colonized people – to the British taxpayer to cover this.”

Evelyn Wanjugu Kimathi, whose father was one of the leaders of the Mau Mau uprising, said there was hope that King Charles would bring “a national apology.”

“Once we have the goodwill from the U.K. government, everything else will be OK,” she told Agence France-Presse in early October.

On Monday, Kenyans gathered on Mau Mau road holding signs that read “Down with colonization, down” and “Return back our historical grabbed land.”

\-----

© New York Daily News


Britannica.com

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Mau-Mau

4 days ago ... Mau Mau, militant African nationalist movement that originated in the 1950s among the Kikuyu people of Kenya. The Mau Mau (origin of the ...

Blackhistorymonth.org.uk

https://www.blackhistorymonth.org.uk/article/section/african-history/the-mau-mau-movement

Mar 11, 2023 ... The Mau Mau rebellion was a response to decades of British colonialism and the land grabbing policies that were pursued by British settlers ...

Bbc.com

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-12997138

Apr 7, 2011 ... The uprising is now regarded in Kenya as one of the most significant steps towards a Kenya free from British rule. The Mau Mau fighters were ...

Thecollector.com

https://www.thecollector.com/mau-mau-rebellion

Jul 10, 2023 ... ... Mau Rebellion gripped the British colony in a violent wave of anti-colonial sentiment.

Theguardian.com

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/aug/18/uncovering-truth-british-empire-caroline-elkins-mau-mau

Aug 18, 2016 ... Colonial authorities portrayed Mau Mau as a descent into savagery, turning its fighters into “the face of international terrorism in the 1950s”, ...

Sahistory.org.za

https://www.sahistory.org.za/article/mau-mau-uprising

May 18, 2018 ... The Mau Mau uprising began in 1952 as a reaction to inequalities and injustices in British-controlled Kenya. The response of the colonial ...


Britain's King Charles visits Kenya with colonialism's scars in focus
2023/10/31


By Duncan Miriri

NAIROBI (Reuters) -Britain's tarnished colonial past took centre stage in Kenya on Tuesday as King Charles began a four-day state visit, poised to acknowledge "painful aspects" of the countries' long shared history as local leaders press demands for reparations.

Accompanied by Queen Camilla on his first visit as monarch to a former colony, Charles arrived in the capital Nairobi overnight.

On a rainy morning, he was welcomed to the Presidential Palace by a 21-gun salute and a guard of honour and, accompanied by President William Ruto, planted trees in the palace grounds. The royal couple then laid a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Warrior in Uhuru Gardens, where Kenyan declared independence in December 1963.

Charles' visit comes at a time when former colonies are demanding that Britain do more to recognise the abuses of its colonial past. Some - notably Barbados and Jamaica - have been re-evaluating their ties to the monarchy.

While still heir to the throne, Charles surprised many at last year's summit of the Commonwealth - a voluntary association of countries that evolved from the British Empire - by acknowledging slavery's role in the organisation's roots.

Many citizens of former British colonies - including leaders of Kenya's Nandi people - want Charles to go further by directly apologising and endorsing reparations for colonial-era abuses, including torture, killings and widespread expropriation of land, much of which remains in British hands.

Buckingham Palace said the visit would "acknowledge the more painful aspects of the UK and Kenya's shared history, including the Emergency (1952-1960). His Majesty will take time ... to deepen his understanding of the wrongs suffered in this period by the people of Kenya."

'AFTER APOLOGIES... REPARATION'

During the 1952-1960 Mau Mau revolt in central Kenya, some 90,000 Kenyans were killed or maimed and 160,000 detained, the Kenya Human Rights Commission (KHRC) has estimated.

The UK government has previously expressed regret for those abuses and agreed a 20 million pound ($24 million) settlement in 2013.

Nandi King Koitalel Arap Samoei led a decade-long rebellion until he was assassinated by a British colonel in 1905. In the ensuing years, the British confiscated most of his people's land and cattle.

Samoei's great-grandson Kipchoge araap Chomu credited the British with contributions to Kenya like education and public health systems but said historical injustices must be remedied.

"We have to demand public apology from the government of the British...," he told Reuters. "After apologies, we also expect a reparation."

Charles also plans to meet entrepreneurs from Kenya's bustling tech scene, tour wildlife facilities and travel to the southeastern port city of Mombasa.

($1 = 0.8226 pounds)

(Additional reporting by Aaron Ross and Hereward Holland; Writing by Hereward Holland; Editing by Aaron Ross, Michael Perry and John Stonestreet)









© Reuters

Reuters UK

'Glass houses': Political panel points to Trump's projection of Biden's 'confusion'

Sarah K. Burris
October 30, 2023

President Donald Trump walks from the west wing of the White House to Marine One in 2017. (Shutterstock.com)

Former President Donald Trump has spent the better part of the past few years claiming that President Joe Biden is in some sort of cognitive decline and that he's too old to be president. Trump is just a few years younger than Biden.

But now an MSNBC panel agreed it may have been a projection the whole time.

One of Trump's favorite things to mock Biden for is when he said the wrong state during a rally. While it had happened to Biden as he referred to Nevada when he meant New Hampshire, one video was falsely changed to make it look as if Biden was referring to Minnesota while he was in Florida.

Steve Guest, the former rapid response director for the GOP, posted a clip of Biden during the New Hampshire incident, writing: “Joe Biden confuses states AGAIN. This is a pattern."

Now, it seems Trump is suffering from the same problem. While in Sioux City, Iowa, Trump said hello to Sioux Falls, S.D. A staffer then rushed out to tell him he was in Iowa. He didn't correct himself, that would be admitting he was wrong. Instead, he simply said the correct name of the city and asked how many people actually lived there and were attending the event. In an interview, he seemed to keep mixing up Biden with former President Barack Obama. He had to be corrected.

Meanwhile, mental health experts describe Biden as far exceeding Trump.

"Again, I misspeak," confessed Nicolle Wallace. "I talk on TV for a job. It's not about that. It's about smearing and insulting your opponent with something you do pretty regularly. ... I do not think that Donald Trump should be president again, but I do not take cheap shots from this chair and that wasn't the attempt. The point is what Donald Trump and many of his allies are trying to do to President Joe Biden is to sort of seed concerns about his age by pointing out and amplifying verbal gaffes. And we thought, as a show, that we would try to shine the light on the glass house in which Trump lives and that's what that sound was about."

Conservative commentator and Bulwark editor Charlie Sykes said that there's no way Trump will ever stop, going so far as to say Trump is "addicted to projection."

"How many of the things he accuses his opponents of are actually things that he engages in," said Sykes. "But I have to say that with donald trump — and, by the way, Donald Trump is going to be in a rich environment for gaffes, But the problem is not the gaffes it's the substance. This weekend when he didn't know whether he was in Sioux Falls or Sioux City he's talking about bringing back the Muslim ban. He's praising authoritarians. He's talking about deporting people who engage in speech he doesn't like. And he continues to talk about, you know, bragging about threatening our allies that he would not defend them against Russia."

He noted that back in the day, 20 years ago, such things were disqualifying for a presidential candidate. He urged people not to take their eye off the substance of what Trump says by being distracted by the gaffes "every single day."

"I think that there's a certain level of exhaustion," Sykes said.

Wallace brought up the autocratic piece of the equation, following it with Trump being confused about which country Viktor Orbán leads, accidently saying Turkey. At another moment, Trump claimed that "Hungary fronts on both Ukraine and Russia." It doesn't. Hungary actually borders several countries, one of which is the country where his third wife was born.

Princeton University Professor Eddie Glaude began by addressing Trump's "cognitive decline" which Sykes said was a very real concern. While it was discussed early in his term, it has remained largely unaddressed until the recent parade of gaffes. But Glaude sees something else afoot.

"Trump's sole purpose is to deliver red meat to the base and to deliver the policies that will satisfy the base," said the political science scholar. "It's not about his cognitive capabilities, it's about his ability to, in some ways, mobilize grievance and some sense of disaffection on the part of that Republican base in order to get what they think they want, the country that they want. There is a collective shrug because it doesn't really matter whether or not he is smart. It doesn't really matter in the end whether he has the capacity to sit in the Oval Office. It only matters that he opens the way to what we might consider those grabbing hold of the country who believe that it's under existential threat if that makes sense."

See the full discussion in the video below or at the link here.


It's 'chilling' Trump thinks he's not responsible for supporter violence: legal expert
RAW STORY
October 30, 2023 

Donald Trump (Photo via AFP)

Former senior prosecutor at the Justice Department and former FBI general counsel Andrew Weissmann pointed to Donald Trump's appeal of the gag order in the 2020 election case, calling it "chilling."

The gag order is under appeal, and Judge Tanya Chutkan had paused it while deciding whether or not it would be fully paused pending appeal. In a filing last week, special counsel Jack Smith explained that pausing the gag order is a dangerous move as he already went on a rant against his former chief of staff, Mark Meadows. It comes at a time when Meadows was reportedly given immunity in the same case.

Weissmann said that the thing he finds the most horrifying is the case that Trump's lawyers made for why the gag order should not remain in place.

"I think it is a question of Donald Trump's own continued words and words where he has seen the consequences of those words that is the reason that you're seeing Judge Chutkan and Judge Engoron take action," said Weissmann. "Because, as they said they're concerned about the targeting of individuals."

He recalled Chutkan's case, saying that there is a fear that jurors, court staff, prosecutors, and even other judges are in danger as a result of the MAGA violence. That's why Weissmann thinks Chutkan is reacting the way she is.

"I think that Judge Chutkan used those words, as you noted, Nicolle, to point out why her order was not unduly vague, meaning that it is important for whoever is subject to an order to know what it specifies because you want to make sure in connection with the First Amendment that you know what's prohibited and what isn't prohibited," Weissmann continued. "And she gave very clear examples in her order saying this is what you could do, this is what you couldn't do and pointed out that in her view that Donald Trump was aware of that and knew exactly what her order specified."

Wallace asked him if he or other prosecutors had seen any other defendant, whether with organized crime or anyone else, who has behaved like Trump. He said simply that he hadn't. Weissmann has tried organized crime cases in New York in the past.

"Quite to the contrary, I've been in cases involving special counsel Mueller's investigation where there were limits placed not just on defendant's counsel, which is standard in the District of Columbia where this a case is, but on defendants [too]," he explained. "Roger Stone being the most notable."

That's when he explained the concerns he has about Trump's ambivalence to violence.

"To your point, Nicolle, and to Tim's point about violence, one of the more chilling aspects of this case was the brief submitted by Donald Trump to the district court saying why there shouldn't be a gag order," said Weissmann. "Saying if there is violence, that's on the people who take up my words and commit the violence. It's not on me, Donald Trump. Saying, 'I can say whatever I want, and if people act on it, don't look at me.' That I find the most chilling because any responsible person who is trying to avoid violence, who is trying to avoid the fear and intimidation, would be saying I'm trying to do everything to not have that happen. To not use my words in a way that they would be used for that."

See the full statement in the video below or at the link here.
It's 'chilling' Trump thinks he's not responsible for supporter violence: legal expert




'He ignited the mob': Lawyers argue Trump violated insurrection clause at Colorado trial

Chase Woodruff, Colorado Newsline
October 31, 2023 

US President Donald Trump at a press conference in the East Room of the White House, October 2, 2019. (AFP / Saul Loeb)

A weeklong trial in a challenge to former President Donald Trump’s constitutional eligibility to seek office again began in a Denver courtroom on Monday with a focus on the events of Jan. 6, 2021, when a pro-Trump mob stormed the U.S. Capitol and interrupted the certification of election results.

Six Colorado voters have alleged in a lawsuit that Trump’s role in “summoning” and “inciting” that mob make him ineligible to hold office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The Civil War-era clause prohibits anyone who took an oath to uphold the Constitution and then “engaged in insurrection” from holding office in the United States.

In an opening statement, attorneys for the plaintiffs, including representatives of the nonprofit Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, said their four-point case was simple: Trump took an oath to support the Constitution; the Jan. 6 attack was an insurrection; Trump engaged in that insurrection; and Colorado election officials can and must bar ineligible candidates from the ballot.

Trump’s attorneys did little to dispute the first and fourth points of that argument on Monday, but they objected to the characterization of the Capitol attack as an “insurrection” and especially to the claim that Trump “engaged” in such an insurrection. Outside the courtroom, a spokesperson for Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign described the lawsuit as “election interference” by “far-left wacko groups.”

The six plaintiffs in the lawsuit include former Republican U.S. representative from Rhode Island Claudine Schneider, who now lives in Colorado; former GOP state legislator Norma Anderson, who is now unaffiliated; and Republican commentator Krista Kafer.

Plaintiffs’ attorneys called as witnesses a member of Congress and two police officers who were assaulted by the mob as it stormed the Capitol. They showed the court extended, graphic video footage of the assault, and of Trump’s remarks in a speech earlier that day near the White House, in a presentation that echoed the substance of the allegations made in a report published last year by a select U.S. House committee convened to investigate the attack.

“This was an insurrection that Trump led,” said Eric Olson, an attorney for the plaintiffs and a former Colorado solicitor general. “He ignited the mob, told them to go to the Capitol, and inflamed them with his tweets.”

But Trump attorney Scott Gessler, a former Colorado secretary of state, faulted the complaint’s extensive reliance on the findings of the congressional Jan. 6 committee, which he characterized as the product of a flawed process.

“They’re asking the court to endorse that one-sided, poisonous report,” Gessler said. “That report is a political document, first and foremost. This, however, is a court of law.”

The House’s nine-member Jan. 6 committee included two Republicans, former Reps. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois and Liz Cheney of Wyoming. GOP opposition in the U.S. Senate prevented the formation of a broader joint commission to investigate the attacks, and House Republicans boycotted the committee after Democrats refused to seat selected members who had voted against the certification of 2020 election results.

Gessler himself spread unfounded conspiracy theories alleging widespread fraud in the 2020 election. In an unsuccessful bid for Colorado Republican Party chair in 2021, he claimed that there was a “very high likelihood the election was stolen from Trump in Nevada” and that there were “huge problems nationally” with election integrity. Claims that the results of the 2020 election were fraudulent have been repeatedly debunked by elections officials, expertsmedia investigationslaw enforcement and the courts.

Recusal motion

Ahead of the trial, Trump’s legal team filed a motion on Saturday asking that the state court judge hearing the case, Judge Sarah B. Wallace, recuse herself from proceedings.

Wallace acknowledged at the start of Monday’s hearing that in October 2022, she made a $100 donation through the liberal-leaning online fundraising platform ActBlue, earmarked for the Colorado Turnout Project, a small PAC formed in 2021 to oppose Republican candidates who “refused to condemn the political extremists” involved in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, with a particular focus on defeating GOP Rep. Lauren Boebert of Silt.

Jason Miller, a longtime Trump adviser, told reporters Monday that Wallace’s donation to a “lefty group” undermines her ability to conduct a fair trial.

“This is election interference,” Miller said shortly before the trial began. “The Democrats, Joe Biden and CREW, they know exactly what they’re doing.”

Wallace was appointed by Democratic Gov. Jared Polis to her seat on the 2nd Judicial District Court in August 2022, and took office in January of this year. She denied the motion to recuse, saying she didn’t recall the specific donation to the Colorado Turnout Project, and that it had “always been my practice” to make political contributions to individual candidates, rather than to PACs.

“I have formed no opinion whether the events of Jan. 6 constituted an insurrection or whether intervenor Trump engaged in an insurrection,” Wallace said. “If I did, I would recuse myself. But because I don’t, I deny the motion.”

Eyewitness testimony

The direct testimony phase of the trial began Monday with several eyewitnesses to the events of Jan. 6, including Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia officer Daniel Hodges and Rep. Eric Swalwell, a California Democrat.

Hodges is the officer seen in a widely shared video shouting in pain as he was crushed in a door frame by the advancing pro-Trump mob. He testified that while stationed on Constitution Avenue near the Capitol in the hours before the attack, he saw large numbers of people advancing on the building from the direction of the White House Ellipse, where the president had repeatedly urged his supporters to “fight” to stop the certification of Joe Biden’s Electoral College victory.

In cross-examination by Trump’s attorneys, Hodges acknowledged that he could not say with certainty whether any individual member of the crowd who assaulted the Capitol had been present for Trump’s speech.

Swalwell choked up at times as he recounted his experiences on the House floor during the attack. He described being alerted to the gas masks stored under lawmakers’ desks, listening to a chaplain’s prayer and texting his wife as he began to fear for his safety before he and his colleagues were evacuated from the chamber.

“We could hear the pounding on those doors and the shouting of the rioters outside,” Swalwell said. “It was haunting.”

Later on Monday, plaintiffs’ attorneys submitted a series of exhibits relating to the attack, including videos, still photographs and findings by the Jan. 6 committee. Wallace accepted the exhibits into evidence over repeated objections from Gessler, who said the videos released by the Jan. 6 commission were “highly produced.”

“It’s a good movie production,” he said. “But it shouldn’t be admitted as evidence.”

In support of the plaintiffs’ claim that Trump engaged in insurrection, attorney Sean Grimsley also presented excerpts of speeches and dozens of social media posts by the former president in the weeks leading up to Jan. 6. The evidence included more than 10 minutes of footage from Trump’s speech at the Ellipse.

But Wallace sustained an objection by Trump’s attorneys to the admission of video excerpts showing close Trump allies Rudy Giuliani and John Eastman speaking to a pro-Trump crowd at the Ellipse shortly before the Capitol attack. In their speeches, Giuliani, a former New York City mayor and GOP presidential hopeful, urged “trial by combat,” while Eastman, a law professor and former visiting faculty member at the University of Colorado Boulder, reiterated a debunked legal theory holding that then-Vice President Mike Pence had unilateral power to block the election certification process taking place that day at the Capitol.

“’It’s incredibly important context to understand what President Trump was saying,” Grimsley said.

“There’s been plenty of evidence that President Trump was telling people that Vice President Pence had the ability to do something,” said Wallace in rejecting the evidence.
An ‘extraordinary’ case

Trump announced his 2024 campaign shortly after the 2022 midterm elections, and has maintained a strong polling lead over a crowded field of Republican primary contenders.

His campaign submitted an application to appear on the Colorado primary ballot to Democratic Secretary of State Jena Griswold’s office on Oct. 11. Griswold is an outspoken critic of Trump who has said the former president did “incite an insurrection and attack our democracy,” but has not yet taken a clear position on the 14th Amendment challenge.

“In light of the claims brought in this proceeding, the Secretary intends to hold Mr. Trump’s application pending further direction from the Court,” Attorney General Phil Weiser, a Democrat, wrote in a notice to Wallace the same day.

Grant Sullivan, an attorney representing Griswold, said in a brief opening statement Monday that the secretary of state does not plan to present evidence in the trial, though a deputy director of the state elections division will be called as a witness by the plaintiffs.

Sullivan said that while the specifics of the complaint against Trump’s candidacy are “extraordinary,” the case is “in many ways a very typical proceeding under the Colorado Election Code.” He pointed to three similar challenges to candidate eligibility filed in Denver District Court in recent years, in which the secretary of state was named as a defendant but did not present evidence in support of either party.

“The Secretary believes that Donald Trump bears significant responsibility for the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6,” Sullivan said. “But she welcomes the court’s direction on whether his actions rise to such a level as to disqualify him from the presidential primary ballot in Colorado.”

Editor’s note: This story was updated at 4:49 p.m., Oct. 30, 2023, to include new details from proceedings in Monday’s trial.

Colorado Newsline is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Colorado Newsline maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Quentin Young for questions: info@coloradonewsline.com. Follow Colorado Newsline on Facebook and Twitter.

Commentary: My struggles with canine love on the rebound

OPED-CANINE-LOVE-COMMENTARY-DMT. - DREAMSTIME/TNS

It started as a typical rebound relationship. I was drowning in grief, and to say my judgment was impaired is an understatement. Tovi had died two weeks prior, breeding an impulsivity in me that no intervention could interrupt. I was sure adopting another dog would sedate my debilitating pain.


The day after he died, I frantically dragged my husband to three shelters and cried when no one came home with us.

Tovi was the closest thing to a soulmate I’ve ever had. He was there for me during my tumultuous 20s, and having him as a stable presence forced me to grow up. We lived in nine places, took road trips and hiked countless trails. He walked me down the aisle and gave me away to a man I would later divorce. At my second wedding, in lieu of flowers, I walked down the aisle carrying a bully stick and gently handed it to the “Best Dog.” I grieved not only for Tovi but also the life he had represented, the memories he held. The “before.”

I had a checklist. Through Petfinder, I found dogs in foster care meeting my criteria, only to find out that the dog had been adopted. Like a desperate buyer in a seller’s market, my heart sank every time. Racing to yet another shelter, I spotted a volunteer in the parking lot carrying a 5-month-old puppy. Knowing nothing about this dog, other than she broke my age rule, it was as if I yelled, “Dibs!” With my checkboxes blank, I went against my rational intent of making an informed decision.


As most rebounds do, Millie seemed good enough.

Millie needed to be spayed before her official adoption. Over the days as I waited to take her home, my mind slowed down. My gut screamed I was making a terrible mistake. I was too ashamed to call the shelter and abandon my commitment, so I dismissed the same voice that warned me two weeks before my first wedding not to get married. Once I adopted her, the thought of bringing her back to the shelter was not something I could entertain. I was sure the shelter would put me on some sort of “do not adopt” list and I would never get a dog.

My gut proved right. Millie wasn’t the comforting presence I sought. I was an emotional disaster. I needed support. I had nothing to give, yet here I was, responsible for this dog. I’m not sure what part of my grief was worse: the life I lost or the life I would soon be living.

Millie felt like an unwelcome intruder; only, I let her in. At home, she was loving. Outside, she was a troubled dog: fearful, aggressive at times, with a noise phobia that quickly ended walks. The blank checkboxes haunted me.

On walks, fearful of anyone she didn’t know and unsure of how she would react, I would introduce her from a distance as my “new dog” and not let anyone near her. I would emotionally vomit on strangers about how I had the most incredible dog before her. As if to prove I once had that dog.


Millie was a constant reminder of my impulsivity, filling me with resentment at every glance. I went through the motions of being the quintessential dog mom. When the superficial wasn’t helping, I sought months of therapy in hopes of breaking through the invisible fence between us.

If we were in a relationship, I would have ended things after realizing we weren’t a good fit. I would tell her, “It’s not you; it’s me,” and mean it with all my heart. I would move on from my rebound, and she would be devastated.

Over the years, with the help of behaviorists (and Prozac), Millie made steady progress. I devoted my life to loving her, being her advocate and keeping her from triggers. I was her person from day one. We shared Prozac, literally. Sometimes we borrowed from each other if the other was late on a refill; “Millie owes Liz (x) Prozac” is scribbled on the whiteboard in the kitchen.


In relationships, I’ve always lived by the motto, “Every time we fall in love, it’s a different experience.” They say you’re lucky if you have one great love in your life. I had that love.

Short of five years into our relationship, Millie was diagnosed with cancer. My initial reaction? Ecstatic. I thought about the new dog I would get and how peaceful life would be with that dog. I was then laden with remorse, and the thought passed as quickly as it came. I finally saw her as the dog she’d grown into, not the dog I adopted years ago. She was the dog I couldn’t sleep without. The dog who learned to love hiking. The endearingly shy dog who allowed people to touch her. (Sometimes.)

Despite chemotherapy, Millie died six weeks later. I was devastated, but it would be cliche not to confess that there was also a sense of relief. I no longer carried the fear of liabilities, the forgoing of vacations and the countless “what ifs” that fueled my anxiety.


In time, with intention, I will adopt another dog and fall in love in yet another distinct way. For now, the words “Millie owes Liz 8 Prozac” remain on the whiteboard and, perhaps, always will.

____

Elizabeth Weiner is a creative writer who has a master’s in counseling psychology and lives in Maryland.

___

© Chicago Tribune

Commentary: It’s time to say goodbye to changing clocks twice a year

2023/10/31  

The sun rises over Chicago and the Eisenhower expressway during early morning rush hour, Tuesday, Oct. 3, 2023. - Antonio Perez/Chicago Tribune/TNS

We are fast approaching the time when we move our clocks back an hour, commonly described as “falling back,” and say goodbye to daylight saving time. Perhaps members of Congress could get their acts together and make it unnecessary to change the clocks twice a year.

On Nov. 5 at 2 a.m. local time, clocks are to be moved back. This will give each of us some extra sunlight in the morning and less sunlight in the late afternoon. As we approach the winter solstice on Dec. 21, the shortest day of the year, the amount of daylight will shrink steadily.

For cities in the South like Houston, their shortest day will be 10 hours and 14 minutes, while for Miami, it will be 10 hours and 31 minutes. In contrast, the shortest day in Chicago will be nine hours and seven minutes, while in Minneapolis, it will be eight hours and 46 minutes. For those in Anchorage, Alaska, they bottom out with five hours and 27 minutes of sunlight.

There is no sensible reason to change our clocks twice each year.

The idea was first proposed by Benjamin Franklin in 1784 to save on candles to produce light. However, it took more than 130 years, in 1918, until it was put into practice. The rationale centered around the clock change being a seasonal time adjustment, with energy savings driving the decision. That first daylight saving “experiment” lasted a grand total of seven months.

After that, daylight saving was reinstituted during World War II, appropriately named “War Time.” It lasted from February 1942 to September 1945.

The Uniform Time Act of 1966 made biannual time changes permanent, though there have been a number of adjustments since then. States can always opt out, yet most do not, maintaining uniformity across the nation. Hawaii and most of Arizona are the outliers, keeping their clocks the same year-round.

Whatever thinking went into changing our clocks seasonally, the digital revolution has transformed the concept of time and made changing clocks unnecessary. Even the idea of 9-to-5 jobs has eroded, with many people working on flexible schedules. The COVID-19 pandemic also drove more people to work remotely, positioning people to work together across multiple time zones.

Yet our nation continues to be tormented by time changes that have persisted based on habit rather than reason. Last year, the Senate passed the Sunshine Protection Act with bipartisan support, making daylight saving permanent. The House never acted to pass the act into law, effectively ending any chance to end the biannual time changes.

Florida U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio reintroduced the bill earlier this year, hoping to gain the necessary support and votes to permanently end time changes.

Sleep researchers have argued that standard time, not daylight saving, is preferred, based on people’s circadian rhythm. Though most of us are unaware of such factors, the circadian rhythm affects alertness, appetite and even body temperature. This may explain higher risks of heart attacks and automobile accidents in the week after daylight saving ends, as people readjust to their innately preferred time.

Given the dysfunction that has become the symbol for Congress, as demonstrated by the U.S. House speaker debacle, eliminating the need to change the time biannually is an easy win for both parties.

If the stumbling block is deciding between daylight saving and standard time, the obvious compromise is to permanently set times halfway between the two. Such a 30-minute shift makes sense, balancing between the circadian rhythm and practicality.

Such a change would quickly be followed by our neighbors to the north in Canada. Provinces want to be time aligned with their adjacent U.S. states. If a time change occurred, each province in Canada would respond to make the necessary adjustments.

If the standard time versus daylight saving debate cannot be resolved, the 30-minute shift is the sensible solution. It would require legislation to make such a change. Yet it represents an easy legislative win that should be able to attract bipartisan support.

Everyone can agree that changing times makes no sense. So let’s do the sensible thing and get everyone aligned with a 30-minute permanent time shift, placing the need to change times a thing of the past, forever.

___

Sheldon H. Jacobson, Ph.D., is a professor of computer science at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He applies his expertise in data-driven, risk-based decision-making to evaluate and inform public policy.

___

© Chicago Tribune

 

HMM Creditors Prepare for Privatization Sale By Executing Share Conversion

HMM containership
HMM's creditors move a step closer to the share sale executing a required conversion (HMM file photo)

PUBLISHED OCT 20, 2023 2:03 PM BY THE MARITIME EXECUTIVE

 

Korea’s two large government-controlled financial institutions executed a required share conversion if they are going to proceed with the proposed sale of their controlling interest in HMM. The move comes in advance of an anticipated announcement next month of the selection of a preferred bidder, and is being seen by analysts as a sign that the sale of the shares in South Korea’s largest carrier is proceeding as planned.

Korea Development Bank (KDB) and Korea Ocean Business Corp (KOBC) were used in 2016 to execute a government-led financial rescue plan for the carrier then known as Hyundai Merchant Marine. They received controlling interest in the company as part of the bailout which today includes shares equal to just over 40 percent of the company, which was rebranded HMM, as well as large tranches of private equity convertible bonds and unguaranteed private bonds with warrants. The conversion of all the bonds and warrants would double the financial institutions’ share position, giving them approximately three-quarters of the shares outstanding.

After years of exploring how best to return control of the shipping line to private investors, the two financial institutions began the process in March 2023 hiring financial advisers. They began accepting interest in the sale in June and in August announced that three companies had been selected as finalists. Hapag-Lloyd, however, had also expressed interest but was excluded from the process as the government wants to keep control of the company in South Korea.

Uncertainty was raised over the process after none of the large Korean conglomerates expressed interest and entered the bidding process. Instead, the three bidders are mid-sized Korean companies and many analysts have questioned if they have the finances to buy HMM and fund future investments. The finalists are Harim, a domestic food company that is a large investor in Pan Ocean, South Korea’s largest dry bulk shipping company, Dongwon, another food producer that also has investments in logistics and port operations with the Dongwon Pusan Container Terminal, and LX, a trading company involved in semiconductors, building materials, and logistics.

HMM proposed in September the early repayment of some of the bonds with conversion rights, but the offer was rejected by the investors. Under the terms of the conversion, they have the right to buy shares at a price that is about a third of the current market value for HMM’s shares.  

KDB and KOBC proposed in their offering documents that they would execute a conversion of a portion of their position, increasing their shareholdings to just under 58 percent of the shares outstanding. Analysts expressed concern that it would increase the total valuation, raising the cost to the bidders or that the conversion would represent a significant dilution in the share value of HMM. 

HMM reported today in a stock exchange filing that it has been notified by the creditors, KDB and KOBC, that they have exercised their rights requesting the conversions on October 19. They will receive 80 million shares for the convertible bonds and an additional 120 million shares from the exercise of the warrants. In total, they will add 200 million shares to their position, with the shares expected for listing on November 10. This will complete a key step in the sale process raising KDB and KOBC’s combined position to the 57.87 percent stake in the offering documents. As part of the offering, the two financial institutions said they would continue to hold the remaining bonds and warrants until at least 2025 and work with the buyer to agree to terms for their later sale.

The execution of the conversion was a required step if the sale of HMM is to proceed. It will likely dilute HMM’s share price which has already fallen 30 percent as the market slowed for the container carriers in 2023 and after the news of the planned privatization sale. The decline in the share price however means that the value of sale has also likely declined from a high of nearly $6 billion to possibly under $4 billion.

Under the process outlined by the financial advisers, KDB and KOBC are scheduled to announce the preferred bidder in November. They will then finalize the terms of the acquisition, which they expect to complete in early 2024.

 

Boskalis Orders Mega-Sized, Methanol-Ready Dredge Following Industry Trends

methanol-ready hopper dredge
Boskalis joins the trend ordering a methanol-ready hopper dredge (Royal IHC)

PUBLISHED OCT 27, 2023 4:05 PM BY THE MARITIME EXECUTIVE

 

The shipping industry’s affinity for methanol as the emerging alternative fuel of choice continues to build with Boskalis becoming the latest to move toward the potentially green fuel. They reported the order for a mega-sized hopper dredge, which will be delivered methanol-ready and join the nearly 200 ships on order for delivery in the next five years that are designed to operate on methanol.

At the beginning of 2023, DNV Principal Consultant Martin Wold forecast the growth of methanol noting that it was emerging as one of the leading contenders in alternative fuels catching up with and overtaking the pace of the far more established LNG designs. In March 2023, Wold highlighted that the orderbook for methanol-fueled ships had reached 100 and now just a little over six months later, the sector has nearly doubled.  While containerships continue to be the dominant group, the adoption of methanol is beginning to reach into more sectors of the industry.

Dutch shipbuilding company Royal IHC and Boskalis reached an agreement for the construction of the massive new trailing suction hopper dredge, which will be one of the largest in the Boskalis fleet.  Expected to enter service in mid-2026, the vessel will have a hopper capacity of 31,000 m3. 

The company highlights the large size and powerful performance will increase the efficiency of the dredging process. With a double suction pipe equipped with underwater pumps and two discharge pumps with a combined discharge capacity of 15,000 kW, Boskalis says the new trailing suction hopper dredger will be well suited to dredging material and discharge over long distances to a reclamation site.

The design process for the vessel stretched over more than three years according to the shipbuilder which notes there was “full co-creation worked on an optimal and future-proof design.” In addition to making the vessel methanol-ready, they highlight that with dual-fuel engines and installing tanks for the future use of methanol, dual-fuel main engines are equipped with two-stage turbos and can be powered by both conventional fuels and more sustainable alternatives such as biodiesel and methanol, providing for a substantial reduction of CO2 emissions. 

The design also increases energy efficiency with elements including full diesel-electric installation and propulsion via Azipods. The companies note that these innovations, combined with the optimized underwater hull design and an advanced automation system, will contribute to a significantly lower fuel consumption.

 

Sweden Fines Ferry Officers for Negligence Causing Grounding and Oil Spill

ferry Marco Polo aground
TT-Line ferry Marco Polo remains aground and leaking oil while two officers were fined for negligence in their navigation leading to the grounding (Swedish Coast Guard)

PUBLISHED OCT 27, 2023 8:45 PM BY THE MARITIME EXECUTIVE

 

 

Swedish prosecutors today announced fines for the captain and third officer of the ro/pax ferry Marco Polo (15,955 gross tons) charging that the two officers acted recklessly navigating the ferry which contributed to its grounding and an ongoing environmental clean-up. This came as the Swedish Coast Guard is calling up additional resources to help with the ongoing efforts and elected officials warned it could take a year to fully recover.

The ferry, which is operated by TT-Line of Germany, had departed Trelleborg, Sweden on October 21 sailing for Karlshamn, Sweden when it reported grounding on Sunday, October 22. The Swedish Coast Guard assisted in the evacuation of 41 passengers and 10 of the 30 crew onboard. 

During the subsequent investigation led by the Coast Guard along with the public prosecutor, they reconstructed the events leading up to the grounding and confirmed earlier reports that the ship touched ground sustaining damage and was likely leaking, but continued under its own power before grounding a second time. The hull of the vessel was damaged causing it to take on water and as of Thursday, the Coast Guard is reporting that 14 cubic meters of oil waste has been recovered from the sea and nine cubic meters from the shoreline. Up to approximately three miles of the coastline has been fouled by the oil. 

According to the prosecutor, the third mate was in command of the ferry before the first event. Despite reduced visibility, including fog in the area and nighttime darkness, he was proceeding only using the vessel’s electronic chart. The Coast Guard believes the electronic position system malfunctioned while prosecutors charged him with negligence for failing to use other navigational aids such as the radar or to add a lookout.

Based on their interviews with the crew, the Coast Guard investigation shows the crew thought they were to the east of Hanö, a small island off the southeast coast of Sweden, when in fact they were in the channel between Hanö and the mainland. After the first grounding, the master of the ferry took command and he too continued to rely on the electronic chart. The ship went hard aground during the second grounding reporting the incident around 6:25 a.m.

The two officers were each fined with one fine of approximately $3,600 and the other being approximately $1,500. The prosecutor highlighted to reporters that Swedish law provides mild penalties for negligence, which these crimes were judged to be, versus harsher penalties for intentional acts. However, the Coast Guard still can impose a water pollution fee and an additional investigation is underway regarding the seaworthiness of the vessel based on the malfunctions.

 

Shoreline clean-up continues with more resources being added to the effort (Swedish Coast Guard)

 

The Coast Guard highlights that it is responsible for the management of oil pollution in the water and that it has strung a boom around the ferry. Overflights showed that the slick has dissipated but they believe oil continues to leak from the ferry and is under the surface. They positioned clean-up crews near shore trying to prevent the oil from washing up and this weekend are assigning 24 trainees to join the clean-up efforts. In addition, they will be calling up 30 people from the Home Guard in the coming days to join the effort. Additional protective equipment is also being sent to the local base as well as tools such as lighting.

The concern is that they estimate up to 300 cubic meters of oil remain aboard the grounded ship. The longer the Marco Polo remains aground, the Coast Guard highlights the dangers increase. They also reported that the clean-up efforts are being hampered by bad weather.

TT-Line is responsible for presenting the salvage plan that will be approved by both the Swedish Transport Agency and the Coast Guard. The plan is still being prepared, but the Coast Guard reports the vessel’s owners are adding salvage resources to the area. They have reportedly positioned two tugs nearby able to respond if required. The Marco Polo remains aground.

 

Germany Begins Negligent Homicide Investigation into Fatal Collision

search operation in North Sea
After scouring the North Sea. the German teams ended the search for the msising crewmembers last night (photos courtesy of Die Seenotretter - DGzRS)

PUBLISHED OCT 25, 2023 2:04 PM BY THE MARITIME EXECUTIVE

 

 

German authorities have begun investigating charges of negligent homicide and endangering shipping traffic in the wake of yesterday’s collision between a bulker and a smaller cargo ship off the coast of Helgoland and near Bremerhaven. The investigations began as the search effort ended with the commanders reporting there was no hope of finding the four missing crewmembers of the Verity (3,400 dwt UK-registered cargo ship). 

The four missing crewmembers are likely to have been trapped inside the vessel as it sunk immediately after the collision with the Polesie (38,100 dwt Bahamas-registered bulker). One of the crewmembers was reportedly recovered by the Polesie which began searching the area shortly after the collision. A second crewmember was also recovered and the two individuals are in hospitals in Germany with non-life-threatening injuries. The body of one other crewmember was later recovered near the scene of the collision.

Divers made two attempts on Tuesday afternoon to reach the Verity, which they determined was lying at a depth of 100 feet. The vessel is reported to be intact, but because of strong currents in the area, they were unable to gain any information. They saw no indications that the crewmembers were still alive trapped on the ship.

The search operation on the surface was suspended around 10:30 p.m. on October 24 with the German authorities reporting they had covered the entire target area. With the use of multiple vessels and helicopters, they scoured the North Sea but reported that conditions had again begun to deteriorate into the evening and night. Winds were again at 25 to 30 mph and the seas were running 6.5 to 10 feet with rain showers in the area. They said there were no plans to resume the surface search on Wednesday.

This morning, remotely operated robot vehicles were sent down to the vessel and again encountered the strong currents. They reported that visibility is limited to between three and six feet. While they were able to film the bridge of the Verity, they found no additional information. Teams are reportedly still reviewing the footage.

 

German rescue teams took a picture of the bow of the Polesie while still in the North Sea at the accident scene (copyright Die Seenotretter - DGzRS)

 

The operation has now turned to an investigation led by the Hamburg public prosecutor’s office and the Federal Police. In addition, the Federal Bureau of Maritime Casualty Investigation (BSU) has begun a formal investigation. In addition, the UK’s Marine Accident Investigation Bureau reported as part of its agreement with the Isle of Man Ship Registry, it has begun an investigation.  The BSU and MAIB will be working jointly.

The Polesie arrived in Cuxhaven, Germany around 4:00 a.m. this morning and docked. German media published pictures showing damage to the bow of the vessel and scrape marks along the starboard bow. Media reports are saying that the crew is likely to be disembarked in Cuxhaven and interviewed. 

Authorities are also concerned because there are reports that the Verity has around 1,300 cubic meters of diesel fuel aboard. They are assuming the fuel is leaking, and media reports said fuel bubbles “the size of tennis balls” have begun to surface. The head of the German Central Command said they believe at least 90 liters have leaked, and they are investigating if it would be possible to pump the fuel off the hulk.

Investigators are looking for the factors that contributed to the collision, while commentators are noting the rarity of collisions of this nature even in a busy shipping lane such as the separation scheme in the German Bight. The French news agency AFP is quoting insurer Allianz which highlighted that despite 38 cargo ships being critically damaged in 2022, only four were due to collisions.