Sunday, November 05, 2023

Turkey's opposition changes leader after election defeat

Dmitry ZAKS
Sat, 4 November 2023 

Former pharmacist Ozgur Ozel, left, replaces Kemal Kilicdaroglu, right, as Turkey's opposition leader (Adem ALTAN)

Turkey's main opposition party on Sunday dumped its embattled leader in favour of an untested former pharmacist following a disappointing election defeat to President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

The staunchly secular Republican People's Party (CHP) has been riven by divisions since Kemal Kilicdaroglu lost a bitterly fought May runoff against Turkey's dominant but divisive president.

At the party's annual congress, delegates voted to replace Kilicdaroglu with the relatively unknown Ozgur Ozel after squandering what many viewed as the opposition's best chance to end two decades of Erdogan's Islamic conservative rule.

The May election came in the throes of a dire cost-of-living crisis that analysts blame squarely on Erdogan's unorthodox economic beliefs.

Kilicdaroglu managed to pull together a multi-faceted alliance that included both right-wing nationalists and left-wing socialists and Kurds.

But the six-party bloc nearly fractured months before the election and then underperformed in the polls.

Erdogan managed to cement his control of parliament through support from Islamic and ultranationalist groups.

Kilicdaroglu then riled many within his own party by refusing to concede defeat and quit.

The 74-year-old lost his leadership post after two rounds of heated party congress voting to a candidate backed by Istanbul mayor Ekrem Imamoglu.

Ozel had spent a large part of his career working as a private pharmacist in the socially liberal Aegean resort city of Izmir.

He eventually became head of Turkey's pharmacy association and was elected to parliament in 2011.

The bespectacled 49-year-old German speaker won the final ballot by a 812-536 margin after promoting himself as the candidate for "change".

But the vote was far more focused on personalities than any particular policies.

Kilicdaroglu compared attempts to unseat him to a "stab in the back".

Ozel countered that he wanted to "write a new story and reshape Turkish politics".

- Focus on March polls -

The CHP congress came with much of the political attention turning to March municipal elections that Erdogan and his ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) enter with a full head of steam.

Erdogan had long prided himself on never losing a national election and keeping his conservative alliance in control of both parliament and Turkey's main cities.

But his air of invincibility was punctured in landmark 2019 elections that saw the opposition win both Istanbul and Ankara for the first time during Erdogan's rule.

Erdogan has been focused on seizing back both cities since his re-election to a final five-year term.

Analysts believe Erdogan's chances are strongest in Istanbul -- the city where the Turkish leader grew up and where he launched his political career as mayor.

Current mayor Imamoglu became a darling of the opposition after winning a hugely controversial re-run election against Erdogan's ally in 2019.

But he has since lost some of his lustre and is currently facing the threat of being barred from politics by Turkish courts.

Imamoglu has been convicted of insulting a public official and could be forced to resign should the ruling be upheld.

He decided against challenging Kilicdaroglu and instead backed Ozel's candidacy.

zak/mca


Jailed for life, Erdogan foe still believes in release


Fulya OZERKAN
Fri, 3 November 2023 

Osman Kavala, seen here in a 2017 photo, was a little-known patron of the arts until his detention (Handout)

Jailed for life without the possibility of parole, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's arch political rival Osman Kavala still believes that he will again walk free one day.

Kavala, 66, was a relatively unknown patron of culture and the arts until his detention upon arrival in Istanbul from Gaziantep in Turkey's southeast in October 2017.

Still reeling from the shock of a failed but bloody coup attempt the previous year, Erdogan branded the Paris-born philanthropist as a foreign-funded agent who was scheming to topple Turkey's Islamic conservative government.


Kavala was placed in pre-trial detention and then faced a series of alternating charges that, for most Western governments, came to symbolise Turkey's drift away from democratic norms.

He was ultimately jailed for life last year in connection with a wave of 2013 anti-government protests that posed the first serious challenge to Erdogan's increasingly dominant rule.

Turkey's top appeals court upheld the conviction in September, ignoring repeated orders from the European Court of Human Rights for Kavala's immediate release.

Kavala's fate now rests in the hands of Erdogan, who could potentially pardon him -- something the president has given no indication he might do.

But responding to AFP questions through his lawyer from his jail cell on the outskirts of Istanbul, Kavala sounded defiantly upbeat.

"I have no doubt that I will be released, since I have not engaged in any activity considered a crime under the law," he said in written comments.

"What I don't know is when this will happen."

- Watching TV, feeding sparrows -

The Council of Europe has launched infringement proceedings against Turkey over its treatment of Kavala, underscoring the diplomatic sensitivity of the case.

It also awarded its top human rights prize to Kavala last month, drawing condemnation from Ankara, which accused the continent's top rights body of pursuing a "political agenda".

Erdogan has displayed repeated irritation with the West's concern about Kavala's fate.

He threatened to expel the US and nearly a dozen other Western ambassadors who signed an open letter calling for Kavala's release in 2021.

Kavala receives regular updates about the ongoing diplomatic efforts from his lawyer, who visits him two or three times a week.

He also watches news on TV, which is mostly controlled by Erdogan's allies and devotes little attention to the opposition.

To maintain his spirits, Kavala reads, writes, and takes occasional walks in the prison courtyard when the guards allow.

"I take a walk and leave bread crumbs for the sparrows," he said.

"In the afternoon, I read books and write a little. In the evenings, I watch movies" on state TV.

He tries not to think about when he might be released "in order to protect my mental health," he said.

- 'Vital for democracy' -


Kavala said it was important for the international community to keep up the fight for Erdogan's jailed rivals' release.

Erdogan unleashed sweeping purges in the wake of the coup attempt that saw tens of thousands of people either jailed or stripped of government jobs.

Turkish courts have also jailed dozens of top Kurdish politicians, lawyers, reporters and rights campaigners on "terrorism" and other loosely defined charges.

Kavala called on foreign politicians to "continue to remind the Turkish government that compliance with (European Court of Human Rights) ruling is necessary for the European legal system."

His case is also starting to make political waves in Turkey, despite the opposition's shrinking access to the media and the ruling party's dominance over most facets of public life.

Secular opposition leader Kemal Kilicdaroglu, who pushed Erdogan to a runoff in a bitterly-contested May presidential election, visited Kavala in jail for the first time last month.

Kilicdaroglu had vowed to release all "political prisoners" if elected.

"I expect them to keep this issue, which is vital for democracy, on the agenda," Kavala said, referring to Turkish opposition and international support for his cause.

fo/zak/gv
BYE BYE BIBI
Netanyahu fights for political survival to beat of war drums
HAMAS REAL GOAL

AFP
Sat, 4 November 2023 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has not accepted any blame for Hamas's surprise October 7 attacks 
(Abir SULTAN)

Israelis, deeply divided since Benjamin Netanyahu returned to power last year, have united against Hamas in war, but experts predict the veteran leader will be fighting for his survival when the conflict ends.

In the shock that gripped Israel after Hamas's October 7 attacks, the country has closed ranks behind the military operation that the 74-year-old ordered to "crush" the Palestinian militants.

But according to experts, security lapses exposed by marauding Hamas gunmen could become the biggest -- and possibly fatal -- blow to Israel's longest-serving prime minister, already battling legal and political troubles.


"Support for Netanyahu and his coalition was draining even before October 7, and since the outbreak of war it has fallen much further," said Toby Greene, a politics lecturer at Israel's Bar-Ilan University and researcher at the London School of Economics.

"If an election were held now he would lose badly."

Beloved as "King Bibi" and "Mr Security" by his supporters and condemned as the "crime minister" by critics and protesters, Netanyahu has long dominated Israeli politics.

But the latest opinion polls suggest a drop off in support for the tough-talking Netanyahu and his right-wing Likud party.

Many are bitter over the lack of protection, especially Israelis living in communities near the Gaza border that bore the brunt of the attacks that Israeli officials say killed 1,400 people, mostly civilians.

Under Netanyahu, a former commando unit officer who has always projected himself as a resolute defender of Jews, the sense of security shared by most Israelis has been shattered.

- 'Every decision' -


While military and intelligence agencies have acknowledged security failures, Netanyahu has not accepted any blame for Hamas's surprise attack.

Netanyahu's allies have stayed quiet about his role, and some rivals have joined his war cabinet, defending the Israeli bombing campaign that the Hamas-run health ministry says has killed nearly 9,500 people in the besieged Gaza Strip.

Reuven Hazan, a political science professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, called Netanyahu a "brilliant" politician now playing for time.

"He already knows that he is fighting for his survival and every decision he takes in this war is geared to ensuring his survival."

When asked if he would consider quitting, Netanyahu recently told a news conference: "The only thing I intend to have resigned is Hamas."

But Netanyahu, whose first term in office dates back to 1996, has been forced onto the defensive.

The leader of Israel's most right-wing government in history admitted he would have to give "answers" about the attacks, but only after the war is over.

And he has apologised for a since deleted social media comment accusing the intelligence services of failing to warn him of the Hamas threat.

To get the wily Netanyahu out of office, he will have to resign or lose the parliamentary majority held by the coalition of his party with far-right and ultra-orthodox Jewish parties.

Leading tech tycoon Amnon Shashua has said the Netanyahu administration must be "immediately" ousted over its "failures, dissonance and incompetence".

- 'Damaged' leader -

Pressure on Netanyahu had been building before the attacks, and experts say a showdown is just a question of time.

The premier, who has led Israel for nearly 16 of the past 27 years, is still fighting three corruption cases in court.

The nine months leading up to October 7 saw mass protests over his hardline government's divisive judicial overhaul that opponents called a threat to Israeli democracy.

Israel had been "ripping itself apart" before Hamas's attacks, said Hazan.

But "there is no politics now because of the war", he added.

"At some point politics will come back. Then there will be questions, and then the protests will come back."

When the war ends, the government is likely to order a commission of inquiry -- either a governmental one with relatively little power, or a more independent national commission.

If Netanyahu is found to be at fault over the attacks, his political problem could become critical.

The government has warned the war will take months and Netanyahu is not obliged to call an election for three years, but observers struggle to see him lasting that long.

"Everybody knows that he is damaged," according to Hazan, who said there were "signs" that coalition members "know that the game is up".

Polls indicate Israelis' preferred candidate was now centrist leader Benny Gantz, a minister without portfolio in the war cabinet who was in the opposition before the war erupted.

"Netanyahu's legacy has been shattered by both the division he has sown through the judicial overhaul and the multiple failures that enabled the October 7 attack," said Greene.

"Many Israelis consider these two issues to be linked."

tw/jd/ami/dv

Turkey recalls envoy to Israel, 'writes off' Netanyahu

Dmitry ZAKS
Sat, 4 November 2023 

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said he was 'writing off' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (YASIN AKGUL)

Turkey said Saturday it was recalling its ambassador to Israel and breaking off contacts with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in protest at the bloodshed in Gaza.

Ankara announced the decisions on the eve of what promises to be a difficult visit to Turkey by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

Palestinian ally Turkey had been mending torn relations with Israel until last month's start of the Israel-Hamas war.

Ankara hardened its tone against both Israel and its Western supporters -- particularly the United States -- as the fighting escalated and the death toll among Palestinian civilians soared.

The Turkish foreign ministry said ambassador Sakir Ozkan Torunlar was being recalled for consultations "in view of the unfolding humanitarian tragedy in Gaza caused by the continuing attacks by Israel against civilians, and Israel's refusal (to accept) a ceasefire".

Israeli foreign ministry spokesman Lior Haiat called the move "another step by the Turkish president that sides with the Hamas terrorist organisation".

But Hamas issued a statement hailing the decision and urging Turkey "to put pressure on President (Joe) Biden and his administration" so that "humanitarian and medical help can reach our besieged people in the Gaza Strip".

Israeli forces have encircled Gaza's largest city while trying to crush Hamas in retaliation for October 7 raids into Israel that officials say killed around 1,400 people -- mostly civilians -- and saw some 240 people taken hostage.

The Hamas-run health ministry in Gaza says around 9,500 people -- mostly women and children -- have since been killed in Israeli strikes and the intensifying ground campaign.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan told reporters that he held Netanyahu personally responsible for the growing civilian death toll in the Gaza Strip.

"Netanyahu is no longer someone we can talk to. We have written him off," Turkish media quoted Erdogan as saying.

- 'Stop this' -


The Israeli foreign ministry said last weekend it was "re-evaluating" relations with Ankara because of Turkey's increasingly heated rhetoric about the Israel-Hamas war.

It had earlier withdrawn all diplomats from Turkey and other regional countries as a security precaution.

Erdogan said Saturday that Turkey could not afford to entirely break off diplomatic contacts between the sides.

"Completely severing ties is not possible, especially in international diplomacy," Erdogan said.

He said MIT intelligence agency chief Ibrahim Kalin was spearheading Turkey's efforts to try and mediate an end to the war.

"Ibrahim Kalin is talking to the Israeli side. Of course, he is also negotiating with Palestine and Hamas," Erdogan said.

But he said Netanyahu bore primary responsibility for the violence and had "lost the support of his own citizens".

"What he needs to do is take a step back and stop this," Erdogan said.

The Turkish leader had taken a far more cautious tone in the first days of the war.

Israel and Turkey had only last year agreed to reappoint ambassadors after a decade of all but frozen ties.

They were also resuming discussions on a US-backed natural gas pipeline project that could have formed the basis for more lasting cooperation in the coming years.

- March on US base -

But Erdogan led a massive rally in Istanbul last weekend at which he accused the Israeli government of behaving like a "war criminal" and trying to "eradicate" Palestinians.

Still more protests will greet Blinken when the top US diplomat begins a two-day visit to Ankara on Sunday that may include talks with Erdogan the following day.

The IHH humanitarian relief fund -- a group whose attempts to organise a flotilla to Gaza in 2010 sparked Israeli raids that claimed 10 civilian lives -- is leading a protest march and car rally on a military base in southeastern Turkey housing US weapons and troops.

The IHH convoy is expected to reach the Incirlik Air Base from Istanbul on Sunday.

Blinken reaffirmed Washington's support for "humanitarian pauses" in fighting during a meeting with Arab counterparts in the Jordanian capital Amman on Saturday.

But the proposal drew short shrift from Netanyahu during Blinken's visit to Israel on Friday.


burs-zak/bp
 ¡VAYA!
ELN concedes abduction of Diaz's father was 'mistake,' vows release

AFP
Sat, 4 November 2023 a

A mural with footballer Luis Diaz is seen in his hometown of Barrancas, Colombia (Lismari Machado)

The head of Colombia's ELN guerilla group on Saturday acknowledged the organization made a "mistake" when it abducted the father of Liverpool footballer Luis Diaz last week, and vowed to work toward his release.

Diaz's parents were abducted in their hometown of Barrancas near the Venezuelan border last Saturday, but his mother was rescued hours later.

Authorities have blamed the kidnapping on an ELN unit and have launched a massive search for Diaz's father, Luis Manuel Diaz.

"The retention of Luis Diaz's father by the Northern War Front was a mistake," ELN commander Antonio Garcia, wrote on his Telegram channel.

"Lucho is a symbol of Colombia -- that is how we in the ELN feel about him," he added, using the nickname of the 26-year-old Diaz, who has made 11 appearances this season for Liverpool and scored three goals.

The incident has threatened to derail high-stakes peace negotiations between the rebel group and leftist President Gustavo Petro, taking place amid a six-month ceasefire.

On Wednesday, the ELN peace negotiators acknowledged to their government counterparts that the Northern War Front was holding Diaz's father.

In his Telegram post on Saturday, Garcia said that ELN's central command was overseeing efforts to set the footballer's father free and had instructed its units to cooperate.

"We hope that the operational situation on the ground can be resolved, this is the guidance that the commanders have to expedite the release," Garcia said.

Local media have published a statement purportedly from the Northern War Front, in which the rebels explain they had kidnapped Diaz's father for ransom and didn't realize he was the father of the country's football star.

The statement could not be independently verified.

Two friends of Diaz's father have composed a song calling for his release.

"Enough of the kidnappings in Colombia," one of the two men, Libardo Brito, told AFP.

- 'Total peace' -

Petro, a former urban guerrilla himself, took office in August 2022 with the stated goal of achieving "total peace" in a country ravaged by decades of fighting between security forces, leftist guerrillas, right-wing paramilitaries and drug gangs.

More than 38,000 people have been kidnapped in Colombia over the years, mainly by groups raising funds with ransom money.

The ELN, one of Colombia's last recognized guerrilla groups, started as a leftist ideological movement in 1964 before turning to crime -- focusing on kidnapping, extortion, violent attacks and drug trafficking.

More than 240 people were detained in just the first nine months of this year by illegal groups in the country, 70 percent more than during the same period last year, according to data from the defense ministry.

vid-das/md-sst/ssy
Thousands flock to Day of the Dead parade in Mexico City

AFP
Sat, 4 November 2023 

Mexico City's Day of the Dead parade drew thousands of onlookers (Rodrigo Oropeza)

Thousands of people lined the streets of Mexico City on Saturday to enjoy a colorful parade in celebration of Day of the Dead, one of the country's most important holidays.

As part of the festivities, dozens of dancers dressed as skeletons or wearing traditional costumes made their way down Paseo de la Reforma, one of the capital city's most prominent streets.

Day of the Dead has become an internationally recognized symbol of Mexican culture.

From November 1-2, people across the country normally decorate their homes, streets and relatives' graves with candles, colorful skulls and flowers -- especially marigolds. Food offerings are also made.

The festival, which in 2003 was added to the UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage list, centers around the belief that the living and the dead can commune during the brief period.

The holiday is rooted in the indigenous Mexica culture, mixed with Christian superstition brought by Spanish colonizers. The Mexica were the dominant indigenous population in pre-Hispanic Mexico.

Mexican cartoonist and lithographer Jose Guadelupe Posada created "La Calavera Catrina" -- a famous skeletal representation of death -- more than a century ago.

Day of the Dead gained new worldwide recognition when it was depicted in the Oscar-winning 2017 Disney film "Coco."

yug/sst/smw


















RUPERT'S MAN AT THE POST
Former editor of The Telegraph named as Washington Post publisher


David Millward
Sat, 4 November 2023 

Sir William also served as CEO of Dow Jones and publisher of the Wall Street Journal

Sir William Lewis, the former editor of The Telegraph has been named publisher and chief executive of the Washington Post.

His appointment was announced by the Washington Post on Saturday night.

Sir William was editor of the Daily Telegraph when the paper broke the story of the MPs’ expenses scandal.

The Telegraph was named newspaper of the year in 2009 for its coverage of the scandal which led to a raft of resignations and several prosecutions.

Sir William, who was knighted earlier this year, joined the Murdoch-owned News Corporation in 2010.

He also served as CEO of Dow Jones and publisher of the Wall Street Journal from 2014 to 2020.

Sir William is now an entrepreneur with The News Movement, a start-up which aims to deliver non-partisan news to a young audience.


His appointment at the Washington Post was announced to the staff by the paper’s owner, Jeff Bezos, who said Sir William’s background in journalism made him a “strong fit” for the post.

“As I’ve gotten to know Will, I’ve been drawn to his love of journalism and passion for driving financial success,” Mr Bezos wrote.

“Will embodies the tenacity, energy and vision needed for this role. He believes that together we will build the right future for The Post. I agree.”

Sir William, who replaces Fred Ryan, takes over with the paper facing financial challenges with a decline in readers and subscribers.

The company, which is aiming to reduce its headcount by approximately 10 per cent, is offering redundancy packages to staff.


According to the paper, it is projected to make a $100 million loss this year.
Poppy growth down 95% in Afghanistan since Taliban ban: UN

AFP
Sat, 4 November 2023 

Taliban authorities vowed to end illegal drug production in Afghanistan and banned the cultivation of the poppy plant, from which opium and heroin are extracted (Sanaullah SEIAM)

Poppy cultivation and opium production have plunged 95 percent in Afghanistan since Taliban authorities banned the crop, according to a UN report published Sunday.

Since returning to power in 2021, Taliban authorities have vowed to end illegal drug production in Afghanistan and in April 2022 banned the cultivation of the poppy plant, from which opium and heroin are made.

The report by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) found that poppy cultivation has collapsed by an estimated 95 percent -- from 233,000 hectares (575,755 acres) at the end of 2022 to 10,800 in 2023.

Opium production has followed suit, plummeting from 6,200 tons to 333 tons in 2023.

This year's estimated harvest amounts to 24-38 tons of exportable heroin, compared with 350-580 tons last year.

The UNODC warned of potential "humanitarian consequences for many vulnerable rural communities" due to the sudden contraction of Afghanistan's opium economy, as growers have had to turn to far less lucrative alternative crops.

Farmers' incomes, estimated at $1.36 billion in 2022, have fallen by 92 percent to $110 million this year, according to the UNODC, with the loss expected to impact the country's already struggling economy more broadly.

Last year, poppy crops accounted for almost a third by value of total agricultural production in Afghanistan, the world's leading producer.

"Today, Afghanistan's people need urgent humanitarian assistance... to absorb the shock of lost income and save lives," said UNODC Executive Director Ghada Waly in a statement.

"For all the other production -- cotton, wheat -- they need much more water," she said at a briefing on the report, while the country was experiencing "three years of consecutive draught".

The Afghan interior ministry's narcotics department said it agrees "to a certain extent" with the UNODC report's estimates of the area under poppy cultivation.

But it dismissed other elements of the report, such as those regarding opium production and socio-economic data, because they were not based on field-based surveys, relying instead on satellite images and previous years' data.

pt/sw/dva
Working from home has caused surge in school absences, says
(BILLIONAIRE)charity founder

Peter Lampl
Will Hazell
Sun, 5 November 2023 

Sir Peter Lampl says working from home has 'affected the obligation parents feel about getting their kids to go to school' - Jeff Gilbert

The head of Britain’s leading social mobility charity has blamed working from home for the rise in children missing school.

Sir Peter Lampl, the founder of the Sutton Trust, said the country needed to have “an honest conversation” about how working from home had “affected the obligation parents feel about getting their kids to go to school”.

School absence has skyrocketed since the Covid-19 pandemic.

According to figures from the Department for Education, nearly a quarter (22.3 per cent) of pupils were estimated to be “persistently absent” in 2022-23 – defined as missing 10 per cent or more of their school days.

Before the pandemic, persistent absence stood at just over one in 10 students.

Sir Peter, a former private equity boss who grew up on a council estate and has spent more than £50 million of his own fortune expanding social mobility, said that the shift to working from home during the pandemic was partly to blame.

Writing for The Telegraph, he said: “We need to address each of the complex problems behind this emergency.

“Firstly, we need to look at working from home – and to have an honest conversation about how the ease of moving your working day from the office to your kitchen table has, inevitably, affected the obligation parents feel about getting their kids to go to school.”

He pointed to comments from Dame Rachel de Souza, the Children’s Commissioner for England, who said in March that there was a “huge amount of Friday absence that wasn’t there before” the pandemic, with some children reporting that they were staying at home because “mum and dad are at home”.

“There’s no ignoring the link,” said Sir Peter.

To drive down absence, he said parents had to return to the office.

“We must … look at ways to get more workers back into offices – where, in my opinion, they belong – and, by extension, encourage them to reappraise their commitment to getting their children into school,” he said.
‘School closures undermined social contract’

Sir Peter said working from home was among a number of factors which had fuelled absence.

“There is clearly a pervasive sense that the school closures during lockdown have somehow undermined the social contract that saw parents insist that their kids made it into the classroom except when they genuinely couldn’t,” he said.

“Certainly, it is harder to make the case to parents that a missed day of school here and there really matters when not long ago schools were shuttered for six months.”

He said the pandemic had also led to a “deeply worrying” rise in mental health problems among young people, which “translates into low attendance”.

And the cost of living crisis had exacerbated the problem, he said, because “when parents literally can’t figure out where the next meal is coming from, ensuring that their children make it to the school gates is the slighter priority”.

Sir Peter said that absence posed “huge implications for social mobility”, with the poorest pupils missing the most lessons, limiting “their results and their life chances”.

According to data published by Dame Rachel last week, the majority of pupils who are regularly late for school fail to achieve five GCSEs.

Sir Peter said parents needed to be “compellingly reminded of the importance of school”, but he also called on the Government to “rebuild” services “that can work with families to get their kids back in the classroom”.

“Years of austerity have seen school-home support officers, family officers, and other related services, cut to the bone. They need to be restored.”
Why Shakespeare’s despots are a warning to today’s tech billionaires

Naomi Alderman
Sun, 5 November 2023 

Smile and smile and be a villain: Mark Rylance as reclusive billionaire Sir Peter Isherwell in Don’t Look Up

Lukas Matsson urinates on a mobile phone in Succession. Miles Bron takes charge of the Mona Lisa during the pandemic, with disastrous results, in Glass Onion. Robert Lemoine orchestrates the death of innocents in Eleanor Catton’s Birnam Wood. Sir Peter Isherwell plans for life on another planet in Don’t Look Up. There have never been so many technology billionaires doing so many stupid, unspeakable and downright evil things. In fiction, of course. One wouldn’t want to expose oneself to a libel action by the richest people on the planet by suggesting that they do stupid, unspeakable and downright evil things in reality.

My own new novel, The Future – fiction, let’s be clear – opens with three tech billionaires receiving a message from their predictive software that the apocalypse is on the way: they board a plane, certain that they will make it in time to their private survival bunkers. Things don’t go the way they expect, to put it mildly. Some of their underlings, we discover, have been horrified by their plans to escape impending disaster, to keep themselves safe while the world burns.

Why have I written about tech billionaires? Why are they so juicily tempting to so many writers and directors? Well. Why are there so many kings in the plays of Shakespeare?


Of the 10 wealthiest people in the world, eight are tech billionaires. They have amassed extraordinary fortunes by presiding over products that have become ubiquitous and essential; try accessing most public services these days without a means of getting online. These people have grown – with the invention and extraordinarily fast adoption of the internet and smartphones around the world – to be much more powerful than surely even they imagined 30 or 40 years ago. Certainly much more powerful than the rest of us ever imagined.

Their power isn’t purely wealth, although of course the scale of their wealth is mind-boggling – money enough to build space rockets and change the infrastructure of whole cities, the kind of thing that previously only governments could do. They have also built our channels of communication, though they often duck the responsibility of owning them. When misinformation about the unfolding horror in Israel and Palestine spreads across social media, millions of people see it and a lot of them believe it. Meanwhile, the question of who has been banned from which platform has become international news – as if they’d had their own passport confiscated.

Edward Norton as Miles Bron in The Glass Onion

These unelected rulers – not the users – control who stays and who goes, who gets to speak and who must remain silent. These aren’t democracies, they are kingdoms.

And whoever the king is, writers need to write about them.

So many of the themes of Shakespeare play out in how we see tech billionaires today. The country Shakespeare was born into had lived through the tumult of Henry VIII, the break with Catholicism and the Pope, struggles for succession, burnings and imprisonments. Then came a period of relative stability under Elizabeth I. A thread that runs through so many of Shakespeare’s plays is the terror of a bad ruler: Lear and his foolishness spark a destructive war; Claudius and corruption drag down the court of Denmark in Hamlet.

The character of the king determines the destiny of the kingdom. There is a powerlessness in an absolute monarchy which is hard to imagine if you don’t live in one: or at least it used to be hard to imagine. Everything depends so absolutely on someone who can’t be removed from office. You’re not trying to judge their character to decide whether to vote for them – you’re trying to understand their personality flaws in order to protect yourself. Elon Musk doesn’t have control of territorial borders or a private army. But in his own online kingdom he can do what he likes and the rest of us have to put up with it: even something as cringe-inducing and irritating as the time he replaced the Twitter bird logo with the face of a quizzical dog, a popular meme.


Billionaire tech mogul Elon Musk - Evan Agostini/Invision/AP

Running an online platform is not the same as running a country. But we’re at a place now where an individual’s obsessions and flaws play out on a huge stage in dramatic, extraordinary and frightening ways. For writers, that’s enticing.

In Shakespeare’s plays, the whims of the king can shape the wishes of ordinary people. Think of Oberon and Titania at war, which results in a state of confusion and, for poor Bottom, a donkey’s head. Now think of the struggle to retain our own focus and attention in the face of technologies that are designed to keep us clicking and scrolling. Think of the petty battles you can see every day online – sometimes it would make more sense to think that someone had put a potion in people’s eyes to make them swear and scream at each other.

Studying the technology industry, I’ve become much more aware that these behaviours are encouraged, that the platforms that we communicate through are trying in a hundred different ways to make us angrier and more afraid. Because those are the emotions that keep us glued to the screen. At a certain point – as one does when one reflects on A Midsummer Night’s Dream – one has to question whether the right people have taken charge of our destiny.

In the plays of Shakespeare, the legitimacy of the sovereign is never fully settled. Bad kings, weak kings, brutal kings who overplay their hand, self-centred kings who are unpopular with their people: their positions are always uncertain. When Cassius and Brutus plot to get rid of Caesar, the audience understands that while they might not be right in what they do, they certainly have a point. Richard II listens to the sycophantic courtiers who tell him only what he wants to hear rather than paying attention to the complex needs of his kingdom – and he ends up dethroned.


This costly blood: Paterson Joseph as Brutus in Julius Caesar in 2012
 - Tristram Kenton/ Bridgeman Images

Some tech billionaires might welcome such historical and literary comparisons. After all, Mark Zuckerberg has a declared fascination with the Emperor Augustus, who “through a really harsh approach … established 200 years of world peace”. According to a recent biography, Musk likes to take leadership inspiration from Napoleon. “If they see their general on the battlefield, they will be more motivated,” he reportedly said of his employees.

As with the divine right of kings, we have to question the legitimacy of their power. Yes, they have invented interesting new technologies. But as one of the characters in my new novel observes: what they have done also has a lot in common with the enclosures of common land during the late 18th century, which helped make the rich even richer. Social media and various online services have invented a new kind of fenced land: a privatised space for “public” debate.

The rise of artificial intelligence has further increased the threat to data ownership. Vast quantities of data are routinely put to work training AI tools, which belong to a new generation of powerful companies – including, as I recently discovered, my own novels, even though I never gave permission for them to be used in that way.


Alexander Skarsgård as Lukas Matsson in Succession

There is a thing about power. It tends to corrupt. Shakespeare wrote so much about monarchs, but we can also think of him, at least in part, as writing for them: his plays are a kind of warning. Everyone has flaws; the more powerful you are, the vaster the stage on which they can play out.

A few decades after Shakespeare’s death, England was engulfed by civil war, which proved a turning point in the balance of power between monarch and parliament. Perhaps we’re approaching that point again, where a small number of people have accumulated far too much power, and we have to wrest the sceptre and orb from their hands.

The proliferating fictional portrayals of tech billionaires – and their intoxicated relationship to power – are surely one (tiny) sign of this: a recognition of an anxiety among us that we (and our data) have been co-opted into just another billionaire’s bid to go to space. Maybe this time we can sort it out in less than several hundred years. Maybe we can do it without the wars and tragedy and bloody revolution of Shakespeare’s plays. Well, maybe.

‘The Future’ by Naomi Alderman (4th Estate) is out on Tuesday. Alderman discusses ‘The Future’ at the Southbank Centre’s Queen Elizabeth Hall on Nov 22.

Mohammed Salim: The 'barefooted Indian' who took 1930s football by storm

Sky News
Updated Sun, 5 November 2023 


"My father was fearless," says Rashid Ahmed, holding his dad's green and white jersey.

The precious family heirloom was brought back to India in 1936 after one of the most remarkable episodes in the history of the game.

The man he describes, Mohammed Salim, was a Calcutta league champion with Mohammedan Sporting Club and the first footballer from Asia to play in Europe.

His grandson Adil, who spoke along with his father, describes football as more than just a game: "In a way, sport was part of India's freedom struggle. They were playing in the last years of British rule and their performances showed that they were as good as their rulers".

He adds, "People like my grandfather gave a lot of hope to people in India."

One of Salim's biggest fans and closest friends, Mohammed Hasheem, worked as a bar tender on a steamship. It was him who persuaded the talented winger to try his luck in Scotland.

When Salim demonstrated his skills in a special trial at Celtic Park the coaches were quickly convinced they had a special talent. Club director Tom Colgan described him to the newspapers as "undoubtedly a player of fine natural gifts".

But there was another problem to be overcome, like most Indian footballers at the time he didn't wear boots.

His son Rashid says: "They had to get an official pass from the Committee for him to play with bare feet."

This was how Salim turned out for his first appearance against Galston on 28 August 1936, before 7,000 supporters in what was effectively a reserve match. Even without footwear, he was the man of the match.

The Scottish Daily Express nicknamed Salim the "Indian juggler" and reported that three of Celtic's goals in the 7-1 victory over the Ayrshire team came from his twinkling toes.

"He balances the ball on his big toe, lets it run down the scale to his little toe, birls it, hops on one foot round defender, then flicks the ball to centre, who has only to send it into goal."

Salim was picked to play again against Hamilton two weeks later, when he scored from a penalty.

"The barefooted Indian biffed the ball hard to the left of the goalkeeper who, although managing to get his hand to it, was totally unable to prevent it going into the net," reported the Daily Record.

The Indian winger's only protection from industrial Scottish defenders was a bandage.

The Daily Record carried a picture of him before the Hamilton match having his feet and ankles wrapped by Celtic's famous trainer Jimmy McMenemy.

His grandson Adil comments that this was a powerful image, "It would have been unimaginable here. This was before India was released from British rule and you would never see a white person touch the feet of a brown person".

The message from the dressing room at Parkhead was that everyone was equal when they pulled on a Celtic shirt.

Salim's final match for Celtic was a 3-2 victory over a Partick Thistle XI in a benefit match at Petershill Park, on 14 September. The Evening News reported that again, "Salim was the brightest player afield."

Celtic has seen enough to want to keep him, but just five days later he left on the same ship that had brought him to Glasgow. Along with his jersey, he carried a pair of white shorts and a gold watch as souvenirs.

Adil says that he was homesick, missing his family back home and Indian food.

Instead, it was fans of the all-conquering Mohammedan Sporting Club who got to enjoy his talents on their way to five successive Calcutta league titles.
As Suella Braverman faces backlash from her own party over homeless 'lifestyle choice' comments, how big a problem is rough sleeping?

Ellen Manning
Updated Sun, 5 November 2023 

Suella Braverman is under fire after suggesting that sleeping in tents on Britain's streets is a 'lifestyle choice'. 
(Getty Images) (DANIEL LEAL via Getty Images)

Suella Braverman is facing an ongoing backlash following her suggestion that pitching tents on Britain's streets is a "lifestyle choice" as she reportedly plans to crack down on rough sleepers.

The government has previously pledged to end rough sleeping by the next general election but is not on target to meet its goal, with the number of rough sleepers increasing for the first time in four years in autumn 2022.

Civil and criminal powers are currently in place for police and local authorities to use but the home secretary is reportedly planning to introduce legislation that would see charities fined for giving tents to rough sleepers.

Braverman's plans, and comments in which she suggested British streets could be "taken over by rows of tents", have sparked widespread criticism – including from her own party, with the Tory Reform Group calling her remarks "ill thought out policies which divide".

The Liberal Democrats said it was "grim politics" to "criminalise homeless charities", while housing charity Shelter said: "Living on the streets is not a 'lifestyle choice' – it is a sign of failed government policy."

Yahoo News UK breaks down everything you need to know about rough sleeping in the UK.



What did Braverman say?

Writing on X, formerly Twitter, the home secretary shared an article from the Financial Times that suggested that the King's Speech could include plans to establish a civil offence that would see charities fined for giving tents to homeless people.

She wrote: "The British people are compassionate. We will always support those who are genuinely homeless.

"But we cannot allow our streets to be taken over by rows of tents occupied by people, many of them from abroad, living on the streets as a lifestyle choice.

"Unless we step in now to stop this, British cities will go the way of places in the US like San Francisco and Los Angeles, where weak policies have led to an explosion of crime, drug taking, and squalor.

"Nobody in Britain should be living in a tent on our streets.

"There are options for people who don't want to be sleeping rough, and the government is working with local authorities to strengthen wraparound support including treatment for those with drug and alcohol addiction.

"What I want to stop, and what the law-abiding majority wants us to stop, is those who cause nuisance and distress to other people by pitching tents in public spaces, aggressively begging, stealing, taking drugs, littering, and blighting our communities."
How many rough sleepers are there in the UK?

According to government figures released in February, the number of people estimated to be sleeping rough on a single night in England in autumn 2022 was 3,069.

That was an increase of 626 people (26%) from 2021 and an increase of 1,301 people (74%) since 2010 when the 'snapshot' approach was first introduced, but marked a decrease of 1,682 people (35%) since 2017, the government said.

The figures suggested that while rough sleeping increased in every region of England compared to the previous year, increases were driven by a small number of areas – with over half the increase driven by 15 areas (5% of all areas).

The largest increase in the number of people estimated to be sleeping rough was in London, where there were 858 people in the latest figures compared to 640 people the year before. The figures suggested that nearly half (47%) of all people sleeping rough on a single night in autumn were in London and the south-east.

They also showed that most people sleeping rough in England are male, aged over 26 years old and from the UK.

A rough sleeping snapshot for autumn 2023 is expected to be published in February 2024.

Government figures on the estimated number of people sleeping rough on a single night in autumn in England since 2010. (Gov.uk)


What constitutes 'rough sleeping'?


Homelessness charity Crisis says rough sleeping is "one of the most visible types of homelessness".

It says: "Rough sleeping includes sleeping outside or in places that aren't designed for people to live in, including cars, doorways and abandoned buildings."

The government's website includes the following definitions:

People sleeping rough are defined as follows: People sleeping, about to bed down or bedded down in the open air (such as on the streets, in tents, doorways, parks, bus shelters or encampments). People in buildings or other places not designed for habitation (such as stairwells, barns, sheds, car parks, cars, derelict boats, stations, or 'bashes' which are makeshift shelters, often comprised of cardboard boxes). The definition does not include people in hostels or shelters, people in campsites or other sites used for recreational purposes or organised protest, squatters or travellers.


Bedded down is taken to mean either lying down or sleeping.


About to bed down includes those who are sitting in/on or near a sleeping bag or other bedding.

What powers do authorities have to move rough sleepers on?

A Commons research briefing on enforcement powers relating to rough sleepers says: "Rough sleeping is often associated with nuisance activities such as begging, street drinking and anti-social behaviour."

It says the police and local authorities have a range of powers to tackle such activities, but points out that homelessness organisations are concerned that the use of such powers "criminalises rough sleeping and does not address the root cause of the problem".

According to the document, rough sleeping is a criminal offence under section 4 of the Vagrancy Act 1824 (as amended), subject to certain conditions. There is also an offence for "being in enclosed premises for an unlawful purpose", which is used, for example, when dealing with people suspected of burglary.

The number of prosecutions and convictions under section 4 of the 1824 act has declined in recent years. In 2019, there were 183 prosecutions and 140 convictions, with only 4 convictions being for the specific offence of 'sleeping out'.


There are various criminal and civil powers available for authorities to use around rough sleeping.
 (Jenny Matthews via Getty Images)

Begging is also a criminal offence under section 3 of the act. In 2019, there were 926 prosecutions and 742 convictions for begging.

The document added that although the number of prosecutions and convictions under the act has declined, homelessness organisations have pointed out that the it is often used informally, to move individuals on or challenge behaviour without formally cautioning or arresting them.

Public bodies can also use powers under the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 to tackle anti-social behaviour, including civil injunctions, criminal behaviour orders, community protection notices, dispersal powers and public spaces protection orders.

But in 2017 the Home Office revised guidance for frontline professionals on the effective use of anti-social behaviour powers to make it clear that Public Spaces Protection Orders (PSPOs) should not be used to target people based solely on the fact that they are homeless or rough sleeping.

What does the government want to do about rough sleeping?

The government published its Ending Rough Sleeping For Good strategy in September 2022 in which it re-stated its 2019 manifesto commitment to end rough sleeping by the end of this parliament.

But in September this year, the Kerslake Commission, a panel of 36 experts, said the government was not on target to meet its goal.

The government's Antisocial Behaviour Action Plan, announced in March, included proposals to provide police and councils with fresh powers to "address rough sleeping and other street activity where it is causing a public nuisance".

The plan said officers should be able to "clear the debris, tents and paraphernalia that can blight an area, while ensuring those genuinely homeless and with complex needs are directed to appropriate support".

A spokesman for the Home Office said: "We want to ensure our communities feel safe and secure.

"That's why, through our Anti-Social Behaviour Plan, we introduced a package of new measures to better equip the police and local authorities to respond to nuisance begging and rough sleeping, which can be harmful to individuals themselves and to the wider public."


Suella Braverman under fire after vowing crackdown on tents and claiming rough sleeping is ‘lifestyle choice’


Kate Devlin
Sat, 4 November 2023 

Suella Braverman has prompted outrage after she vowed a crackdown on tents used by the homeless and described rough sleeping as a “lifestyle choice”.

The home secretary claimed streets risked being “taken over” and that without action British cities would see “an explosion of crime, drug taking, and squalor”.

She added that many of those living in tents were “from abroad”. Those who were genuinely homeless would always be supported, she said.

But in a raft of criticism over her remarks, she was accused of “disgraceful” politics and of blaming the most vulnerable for her government’s failings.

Even former Tory MPs condemned her push to fine charities who give tents to the homeless – part of proposals pitched to be included in the King’s Speech on Tuesday.

Ex-Tory MP Ben Howlett said such a move would be “actually evil” and “not a single MP with any shred of decency” could support it.

Charities have criticised Braverman’s claims that living on the streets is a ‘lifestyle choice
’ (PA)

It comes as Ms Braverman, who is currently on a visit to the Greek island of Samos, said:

If anyone were to vandalise the Cenotaph during pro-Palestine marches on Armistice Day “they must be put into a jail cell faster than their feet can touch the ground”

she again referred to the protests as “hate marches”, despite a furious row over the phrase that has even included Gary Lineker

When asked about restricting homeless people from using tents, said “it cannot be right that parts of our cities are ruined and blighted by the sights and the use of tents”

Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper accused Ms Braverman of picking “a fight over tents” as Labour said ministers were “blaming homeless people rather than themselves” after rough sleeping rose dramatically since 2010. Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesperson Alistair Carmichael denounced it as “grim politics from a desperate Conservative government which knows its day are numbered”.

And homelessness charity Shelter said: “Let’s make it clear: living on the streets is not a ‘lifestyle choice’ – it is a sign of failed government policy. No one should be punished for being homeless. Criminalising people for sleeping in tents, and making it an offence for charities to help them, is unacceptable.”

In her statement on the issue, written on X, formerly Twitter, Ms Braverman said that “nobody in Britain should be living in a tent” and that the government was working to help the homeless, including through treatment for those with drug and alcohol addiction.

She said she wanted to stop those who cause nuisance and distress to other people. She added: “We will always support those who are genuinely homeless. But we cannot allow our streets to be taken over by rows of tents occupied by people, many of them from abroad, living on the streets as a lifestyle choice.”

Shelter estimated earlier this year that at least 271,000 people are recorded as homeless in England, including 123,000 children.

The last Conservative manifesto pledged to end rough sleeping before the next election, due by January 2025. But in September, the government was warned by the Kerslake Commission, a panel of 36 experts, that it was not on target to meet that goal.

Instead, figures published earlier this year show the number of people estimated to be sleeping rough in England had risen for the first time since 2017.

A snapshot of a single night in autumn last year found 3,069 people sleeping rough, up 626 (26 per cent) on the equivalent total for the previous year and nearly three-quarters (74 per cent) higher than in 2010 when the figures began.

The British Red Cross has also warned that since August they have seen a 140 per cent increase in the number of people with refugee status becoming destitute. They said they were having to hand out sleeping bags and tents to people who are facing life on the streets.

A report has warned the deadline for ending rough sleeping by the end of this parliament will not be met
(PA Archive)

Matt Downie, the chief executive of the charity Crisis, said new laws to crack down on the use of tents would do little to tackle rough sleeping but risked pushing people further into destitution.

“Ending rough sleeping is absolutely possible but it requires government to step up and make the changes needed that will actually achieve it, including investing in housing benefit so people can afford their rent. Stripping people of their only protection is not the answer,” he said.

Labour frontbencher Lisa Nandy said: “Even by this government’s standards, this is disgraceful. Imagine looking at the housing and homelessness crisis you’ve presided over and thinking, ‘let’s take away their tents’.”

Ms Braverman’s statement was posted alongside a link to reports she is pitching for a new civil offence to be included in the King’s Speech on Tuesday that could see charities fined if they give tents to rough sleepers, who then go on to cause a public nuisance.

The Home Office said it would not comment on what might feature in the King’s Speech. But officials pointed to the Antisocial Behaviour Action Plan announced in March, which included proposals to provide police and councils with fresh powers to “address rough sleeping and other street activity where it is causing a public nuisance”.

The plan said officers should be able to “clear the debris, tents and paraphernalia that can blight an area, while ensuring those genuinely homeless and with complex needs are directed to appropriate support”.

Does Suella Braverman relish her position as the most controversial minister in the cabinet?

Sky News
Updated Sat, 4 November 2023 


For Suella Braverman, there is no such thing as a quiet trip abroad.

Once again her language is attracting attention, her words heard well beyond the shores of Samos in Greece.

On a trip to talk about immigration, the questions following her are about pro-Palestinian protests and her claim homeless people pitching tents are making a "lifestyle choice".

Speaking exclusively to Sky News, she said she has a "thick skin" when it comes to criticism.

Her language is characteristically provocative. She warned anyone vandalising the Cenotaph on Armistice Day "must be put into a jail cell faster than their feet can touch the ground" - and says cities can't be "ruined and blighted" by homeless people's tents.

Criticism will follow - Labour say she is "overseas to distract" - but Mrs Braverman is appealing to a specific chunk of the electorate and of her party.

She knows the next Conservative leadership race is likely to be fought on the right.

But as home secretary, Mrs Braverman will be judged above all by the government's pledge to "Stop the Boats".

The number of small boat crossings in the UK - 27,000 so far this year - is lower than it was in 2022, but a long way from the few hundred recorded five years ago when the government declared the number of crossings a "major incident". She certainly cannot claim to have stopped the boats.

Mrs Braverman said she is "not claiming success yet" but refused to set a target for where the number of crossings should be by the next election. "It will be obvious" if the government has succeeded, she added.

She believes the UK can "learn" from Greek deterrence methods on immigration.

The Greeks have gone from nearly a million small boat crossings in 2015 to 12,700 last year - a lower number than in the UK.

But Greece has also been accused of controversial "pushback" tactics at sea - and charities say they have evidence of strip searches and beatings at the Greek border.

Suella Braverman insists pushbacks are not the UK approach, but "tough" deterrents must be looked at.

Numbers in Greece have also fallen because of a returns deal with Turkey - and so far, the UK has had little success in securing an effective returns deal with France.

Over the last few days, we have seen Suella Braverman as she would like to be portrayed: out on a border patrol with Hellenic coastguard, walking along a 75-mile (120km) steel fence at the land border between Greece and Turkey.

A home secretary talking tough on immigration on the world stage.

The images of Suella Braverman sitting in the captain's chair aboard a patrol cutter felt reminiscent of Margaret Thatcher's famous appearance on the Challenger Tank (or Liz Truss' later re-enactment).

I asked her if she relishes her position as the most controversial cabinet minister. She said: "Personal attacks will always come with the territory."

But Brand Braverman is provocative to say the least. The home secretary may be here to talk about immigration, but her ambition stretches well beyond stopping the boats.