Monday, August 23, 2021

China crackdown on tutoring sector leads to protests

The crackdown exacerbated financial problems for these firms, leading to more protests in any month since January 2019.

China cracked down on the tutoring sector to level the playing for children across the country [File: Anthony Kwan/Getty Images]

Chinese President Xi Jinping’s crackdown on the tutoring industry aims to help create a more harmonious society by leveling the education playing field for children across the country, but it’s having the opposite effect early on.

There have been eight protests involving workers in the nation’s education sector so far in August, the most in monthly data compiled by labor watchdog China Labour Bulletin going back to January 2019. There were another two incidents in late July in the days after the overhaul was announced.

One of the protests involved a company in Shanghai that helps students prepare to study overseas whose management fled without paying its employees. Similar episodes were seen in cities such as Beijing, Changsha and Nanjing. The crackdown exacerbated the financial problems many schools were facing because of the pandemic, said Aidan Chau, a researcher at the Hong Kong-based organization.

“Before, companies were still hoping that they could continue, but after July, some school managers just decided to close down and run away,” he said. “We expect that there will be more cases coming once actual policies really materialize.”

China unveiled a broad revamp of its $100 billion education tech sector, banning companies that teach the school curriculum from making profits, raising capital or listing. The move came as youngsters complained about excessive demands of tutoring, and parents worried about high fees and their children falling behind if they didn’t take extra classes.

Chau said the protests so far involved smaller firms because larger ones had better policies and paid employees amounts that met or sometimes exceeded legal requirements.

He called on the official All-China Federation of Trade Unions to help the educators get their pay and resolve other issues. “If the official union does nothing, then when the workers decide to take action themselves,” the Communist Party or the union won’t have an excuse, he said.

The federation of unions, a state-approved umbrella organization, didn’t respond to a request for comment.

The labor watchdog’s data is based on keyword searches of Chinese social media platforms, including the Twitter-like Sina Weibo and Tencent Holdings Ltd.’s WeChat messaging app so it provides only a glimpse of the labor protest situation in the nation.

The Collapse of China’s Online Tutoring Industry Is Taking American Educators Down With It

By Emily Tate     Aug 16, 2021

The sky was still pitch-black when Anna Whitehead rose from bed to begin teaching for the day. It’s a routine she has grown accustomed to over the past two years—waking up around 4:40 a.m. and logging on, bleary-eyed, to teach English to a cadre of children in China.

Except this time, on Aug. 5, the routine was interrupted.

Whitehead, who on top of being an online English-language tutor works full-time as a high school teacher in a traditional classroom in Alabama, had received a frantic text from the mother of one of her Chinese students overnight. GoGoKid, the online tutoring platform that Whitehead contracts with to supplement her family’s income and help make ends meet, was shutting down immediately.

She checked her email, hoping the mother had misunderstood, and found a message from the company confirming its demise. “Dear teachers,” the email began. “This letter is to inform you that as of Aug 5th 2021, GOGOKID will suspend the curriculum offered to all Chinese students. This decision is in light of the recent educational policy revisions in China. All classes starting on Aug 5th will be cancelled from the system.”
“It was the worst possible outcome ... It just felt like the rug was yanked out from under us.”

The language—“suspend the curriculum”—was a bit vague, but the message was crystal clear: It was over.

Whitehead, who’d had 25-minute classes lined up back-to-back throughout the morning, watched in horror as each one disappeared from her schedule.

“It was the worst possible outcome,” she said in an interview the day after the email came through. “I could’ve at least given them an awesome lesson and told them goodbye. It just felt like the rug was yanked out from under us.”

For many of the thousands of Americans who tutor through GoGoKid, the news was shocking but not entirely surprising. They were bracing for some degree of changes, following China’s recent crackdown on tutoring. But even if the company was forced to shutter, few tutors expected it to happen this soon—or this abruptly.

“We had heard, about a month ago, that there were some sweeping regulations coming to China, so I had an idea something would change,” said Sharisse Quinones Robinson, an online English-language tutor for GoGoKid who lives in DeLand, Fla. “But I didn’t know it would be this severe, and I didn’t know we’d get zero notice.”

GoGoKid, an education product under Beijing-based company ByteDance (which also owns TikTok), collapsed overnight. Other companies in the space are slowly crumbling. Days before the GoGoKid email went out, rival service Magic Ears told teachers that it, too, would wind down its services over the next six to 12 months. Competitors such as QKids, Landi English and others have followed suit, saying that they would allow teachers to tutor until Chinese families’ pre-paid class packages run out. And recently, tutoring behemoth VIPKid sent out a notice to its foreign teachers saying that while it planned to continue to operate as a tutoring company in other countries, its business in China had only “several months” left.

“I had an idea something would change. But I didn’t know it would be this severe, and I didn’t know we’d get zero notice.”

Boom — and Bust

Quinones Robinson wasn’t wrong about a major shakeup to China’s online tutoring market. But she, like many others, underestimated its extent. In late July, the country rolled out new regulations that severely limit for-profit tutoring services and bar foreign investment in private education companies. It comes after years of enormous growth for China’s tutoring sector, including the emergence and expansion of a number of platforms that connect young children in China with native English speakers overseas for live, one-on-one language lessons.

By 2019, VIPKid, a major player in the online English-tutoring market, claimed to contract with nearly 100,000 American and Canadian tutors who served a combined 600,000 children in China. (VIPKid declined to share current numbers.) Qkids, meanwhile, claims on its website that it connects “over 1 million international young learners” with educators. The exact reach of these companies—this industry—is not clear, but their collective footprint is massive, global and estimated to be worth billions of dollars.

The arrangement worked well for both parties. Some Americans had finagled it into a full-time job, but more often, the platforms drew teachers who didn’t make enough money in the classroom alone to cover the bills. Many viewed tutoring as a flexible, fortuitous “side hustle,” a work-from-home slice of the gig economy. In China, wealthy and middle-class parents saw private English tutoring—especially led by native English speakers—as a way to get ahead, a canny edge on other students against whom their own children would some day have to compete.

While Chinese families have been forking over the equivalent of tens of thousands of U.S. dollars to support their children’s private educations after regular school hours—often at night, before bedtime—American tutors have been raking in up to $22 an hour by waking at the crack of dawn to squeeze in a few lessons before their own families wake up and the typical workday begins.

The official reason for the crackdown is that the financial pressure on Chinese families and academic pressure on Chinese children has become untenable. The high-stakes culture around education in China—and the subsequent costs associated with it—has become so fraught that many parents say they can’t justify having another child, which the Chinese government now encourages. It would simply break them financially. Recognizing this strain—and the declining birth rate it has perhaps led to—the Chinese government decided to act.

One unofficial reason for the new regulations, however, could be that companies like GoGoKid and VIPKid have provided Americans with unfettered access to young, impressionable Chinese children. As tensions between the United States and China escalate, many observers speculate that the Chinese government wanted to curtail Western influence on its youngest minds.

Americans who tutor for VIPKid and GoGoKid believe it’s a combination of those reasons. They have certainly seen first-hand the high expectations set for children in China.

“I have one student who said, on a Saturday, ‘I have 13 hours worth of class today,’” Whitehead recalled. “I said, ‘Wow,’ and she said, ‘Oh, it’s not so bad. I have a friend who has 17 hours.’”

Quinones Robinson used to teach a 5-year-old whose lesson began at 8:30 p.m. local time, and she said it was difficult to watch.

“He was exhausted. He was falling asleep,” Quinones Robinson said. “These kids are worked so hard. … Part of me thinks this will be good for them.”
“Do you really want a country that’s your adversary teaching your children? We have contact with these kids every day.”

Joe Madrid, an American tutor for GoGoKid who now lives in Chiang Mai, Thailand, said he’s taught kids who describe staying up doing their homework till midnight or 1 a.m. and going to training centers on weekends. The pressure and the burden on families are real, he said. But he thinks the new regulations have more insidious motivations as well.

“Do you really want a country that’s your adversary teaching your children?” Madrid asked, incredulous. “We have contact with these kids every day. … It seems like a strange thing to me.”

A One-Two Punch

Whitehead, the tutor based in Houston County, Alabama, has been a classroom teacher in the U.S. for eight years. Her husband is also a teacher. Their combined income from working in brick-and-mortar schools was not enough to cover basic needs. “Out of desperation,” Whitehead signed up to be an online English-language tutor a couple of years ago. It would end up being one of the most meaningful decisions and experiences of her life, she said.

Her monthly take-home pay from her full-time teaching position is about $2,500 to $2,800. She was bringing in another $1,500 to $1,800 a month by teaching 20-25 hours a week on GoGoKid and said that money is “absolutely essential” to her family’s livelihood.

“There are a lot of teachers who do this to make their ‘mad money,’ if you will,” Whitehead explained. “I do it for Christmas gifts, for paying credit card bills, for paying normal bills. It doesn’t just pad my income. It helps me stand up straight with my income.”

Anna Whitehead, a high school teacher in Alabama and former online tutor with GoGoKid, poses with a puppet she used during English-language lessons with children in China. (Screenshot from Zoom)

The timing stings. Whitehead and her husband recently bought a new house. “There has been debt incurred because of that, so it’s a tremendous financial blow,” she said.

For Quinones Robinson, online tutoring allowed her to leave an office job that she’d begun to resent and spend more time at home with her children. In 2018, when she got started with VIPKid and GoGoKid, she was a single mom who taught a few sessions in the mornings before work. In no time, though, she was making as much money tutoring as she was from her office salary and decided to hand in her resignation. For three years now, she said, she has been working 25 hours a week from home, in her pajamas, instead of 40 hours a week in business attire at an office: “It’s been awesome.”

Quinones Robinson was making $2,400 to $2,600 a month before GoGoKid’s “Dear teachers” email came through earlier this month and turned her world upside down. She and her husband also bought a new home back in December. “We have to pause for a moment,” she said about her family’s finances and lifestyle. “But I’ll figure this out, whether it’s through Instacart shopping or something else.”

“It’s a tremendous financial blow.”

Whitehead is confident she will find the money elsewhere, too—she mentioned interviewing for other jobs, selling “aggressively” on Teachers Pay Teachers and donating plasma. The harder blow, she said, is being cut off from the children that she has come to know and, by her account, love. When the pandemic began, many families shipped her face masks to make sure she was protecting herself. Some have sent her letters in the mail and gifts on her birthday.

“This is the first day in two years I haven’t gotten up to see them,” Whitehead said on Aug. 6, through tears. “It’s extremely emotional. … I have had the honor of being in their homes, seeing their families, meeting their pets, and hearing about injuries and favorite toys. It’s so different from the American education setting.”

Whitehead is connected to some of her students’ families on WeChat, separate from the GoGoKid platform. But others are “completely gone,” she said. She doesn’t know their real names. They live thousands of miles away. “They’re just gone. That’s the hardest part.”

One student, a girl called Tongtong, is among those that Whitehead feels she’s lost forever. On a video call for this story, she held up a drawing that Tongtong had made for her and then rattled off personal details about the girl: She wanted to be a lawyer. She has a pet bird. Her grandmother has a garden. She gets up every morning before 6 to read.

“I know these kids’ hopes. I know their dreams. I know their frustrations,” Whitehead said. “A million miles away, it’s so familiar.”

Forced Underground

Within hours of GoGoKid’s announcement to shut down, parents in China and tutors in America began scrambling to find one another. Parents in China set up virtual private networks to log onto Facebook, which is typically blocked in the country, and join private groups of GoGoKid teachers, searching for their child’s tutors by sharing screenshots from the app and listing usernames. Tutors, in turn, downloaded WeChat and listed themselves under the names they go by on GoGoKid (Quinones Robinson, for example, is “Teacher Edith”).

Everyone, it seemed, was frantic and desperate to be reunited after their GoGoKid accounts suddenly went dark.

One parent in China who found her way into a private Facebook group of GoGoKid teachers responded to questions via Facebook messenger, saying, “It is hard for me to accept the abrupt ending like this. I do believe many other parents should feel the same.”

The parent, who asked that her name be withheld since she is not supposed to be seeking out foreign educators, said that teachers and parents had formed WeChat groups and started Google Docs to share contact information. On Aug. 6, she said that some people had found who they were looking for.

“It is kind of like searching for your friends after the war,” she said. “Maybe I will never find them, since there are more than 10,000 teachers on GoGoKid. You cannot say how big [a] deal it is during your whole life. But the feeling of loss and being deprived would always be there.”

On Aug. 8, she followed up to say she had found her son’s teachers. “Wonders happened,” she wrote.

“Sometimes I feel guilty contributing to this constant education. But the thing is, these parents are going to find a way.”

Parents and tutors who were shut out of GoGoKid have wasted no time trying to recreate the arrangement on their own. Some of the parents of Whitehead’s students have found her and have asked her to continue teaching their children, through private lessons. She’s not sure exactly what that would look like, but imagines it could take place over Zoom and involve a lot of screen-sharing.

“It’s not just my families,” Whitehead said. “It’s all over. They’re desperate.”

Quinones Robinson had one parent contact her already. The child’s mom messaged her and said, “I found you!” And Madrid, the tutor who lives in Thailand, has already taught a private lesson to a student whose parent he was able to reconnect with on WeChat.

“The mother is not happy this happened, but she has more control now over what her child learns,” Madrid explained. “Now, we work together. I show her the lessons, she says, ‘This is what I want.’ It’s more collaborative.”

The same Americans who worry kids in China are being pushed too hard to excel are now helping parents set up an underground tutoring market. But many say that the continuation of private education services is inevitable, so why bow out now?

“Sometimes I feel guilty contributing to this constant education,” Whitehead said. “But the thing is, these parents are going to find a way. The way the society is set up, their future depends on what their children do.”

The Fate of the Others

GoGoKid may be gone, but other tutoring companies hope to hang on—some for mere months, and others for good.

In a recent email to teachers, Magic Ears leadership laid out a sobering future for the company.

“To be clear, the growth of the online ESL [English as a Second Language] industry is no longer being encouraged and it will not be permitted to expand,” the email said. “The new regulations set in place will restrict activity for all ESL companies based in China, it will shrink the industry and eventually it will be dissolved entirely. All companies, including Magic Ears, have downsized. We are now running on only a quarter of the staff that was initially supporting our students and teachers.”

The email goes on to say that the Chinese government will allow tutoring companies to honor their contractual obligations to parents who have already purchased bulk class packages. Some parents had purchased “many months or even a year of classes in advance.” The company expects to offer its final lessons in about a year’s time.

VIPKid emailed teachers on Aug. 7 with its own update.

“First and foremost, let us be clear that we are confident that VIPKid’s business will remain operational,” the email said.

Like Magic Ears, VIPKid will let parents in China who have purchased class packages finish out the lessons they have already paid for. “VIPKid teachers can still count on work for several months with students in China,” the notice reads.

After those classes have been taught, VIPKid’s service in China—at least as it currently exists, pairing North American tutors with Chinese children—will come to an end. But the company’s “long-term vision” involves expanding tutoring services into other countries, subjects and age groups. In the past year, VIPKid has been piloting a partnership with BookNook to provide reading services to students in the U.S. and is developing another service for adult learners across the globe.

“We expect these teaching opportunities to grow in the coming months,” VIPKid told teachers in the email. “It is our intention to minimize the impact to teachers.”

A spokesperson for VIPKid declined to share specific details around how much longer its one-on-one tutoring service in China may run, but said that as of Aug. 7, families in China can no longer purchase new classes with foreign educators.

Many tutors who have ongoing contracts with VIPKid are not optimistic that the company can pull off the international expansion. Chatter in private Facebook groups tends to be fatalistic.

The day after GoGoKid shuttered, Quinones Robinson woke up early and taught a child through VIPKid’s platform for the first time in a long time. She plans to tutor on VIPKid for as long as she can get bookings. But, expecting that VIPKid will fold soon, just like the others, she said she’d be building out her own private tutoring business in the meantime.



Emily Tate (@ByEmilyTate) is a senior reporter at EdSurge covering early childhood and K-12 education. Reach her at emily [at] edsurge [dot] com.

DUH, OH!
Ex-NASA Scientist Warns Earth Will Be Too Hot For Humans in a Billion Years




A user asked about the size of the asteroid to make the Earth’s orbit bigger.

In his paper, David Holz has proposed a plan to save the Blue Planet from destruction.


LAST UPDATED:AUGUST 23, 2021, 
FOLLOW US ON:
BUZZ STAFF

A former scientist of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has claimed that Earth will burn up unless humans steal energy from Jupiter’s orbit. David Holz, a PhD, has also proposed a plan to avoid the destruction of the Blue Planet in 1 billion years. According to him, scientists should use giant asteroids to make the Earth’s orbit bigger so that we “steal" energy from Jupiter’s orbit. The physicist and entrepreneur has further claimed that it will expand the distance of Earth from the Sun and will also help in preserving the planet and human species for “at least" 5 billion more years.

Holz said that this is his “out-of-this-world idea” and it needs a good deal of improvements in various space-related technologies first.

Recently, Holz shared on Twitter the screenshots from a new academic paper. It is published by NASA, University of California, and University of Michigan professors. The paper is titled, “Astronomical engineering: a strategy for modifying planetary orbits".


He said around one billion years from now, the Sun will be too hot and the temperature of Earth will increase, making it too vulnerable for humans to survive at its current distance.

Holz, in his tweet, suggested that energy from Jupiter must be stolen to gradually expand Earth’s orbit and the process must be repeated every 6000 years. According to him, it will prevent the Earth from getting close to the Sun again and burning up.

A user asked about the size of the asteroid to make the Earth’s orbit bigger. He suggested that its size should be 130km by 130km by 130km. Holz agreed with him.


He also responded to one more question about the asteroid.



Earlier in February 2020, he proposed nation-sized solar panels to float high above the atmosphere to block the Sun’s rays to adjust the earth’s temperature manually.
Big oil coined ‘carbon footprints’ to blame us for their greed. Keep them on the hook


Climate-conscious individual choices are good – but not nearly enough to save the planet. More than personal virtue, we need collective action

Temperatures have reached record heights in southern Italy, which has been badly hit by wildfires. Climate scientists say there is little doubt that climate change is driving extreme weather events. Photograph: Salvatore Cavalli/AP

Rebecca Solnit
Mon 23 Aug 2021 

Personal virtue is an eternally seductive goal in progressive movements, and the climate movement is no exception. People pop up all the time to boast of their domestic arrangements or chastise others for what they eat or how they get around. The very short counterargument is that individual acts of thrift and abstinence won’t get us the huge distance we need to go in this decade. We need to exit the age of fossil fuels, reinvent our energy landscape, rethink how we do almost everything. We need collective action at every scale from local to global – and the good people already at work on all those levels need help in getting a city to commit to clean power or a state to stop fracking or a nation to end fossil-fuel subsidies. The revolution won’t happen by people staying home and being good.

But the oil companies would like you to think that’s how it works. It turns out that the concept of the “carbon footprint”, that popular measure of personal impact, was the brainchild of an advertising firm working for BP. As Mark Kaufman wrote this summer:

British Petroleum, the second largest non-state owned oil company in the world, with 18,700 gas and service stations worldwide, hired the public relations professionals Ogilvy & Mather to promote the slant that climate change is not the fault of an oil giant, but that of individuals. It’s here that British Petroleum, or BP, first promoted and soon successfully popularized the term “carbon footprint” in the early aughts. The company unveiled its “carbon footprint calculator” in 2004 so one could assess how their normal daily life – going to work, buying food, and (gasp) traveling – is largely responsible for heating the globe.

The main reason to defeat the fossil fuel corporations is that their product is destroying the planet, but their insidious propaganda, from spreading climate-change denial to pushing this climate footprint business, makes this goal even more worthwhile.

Carbon footprints caught on, and I routinely see people on social media zooming in on individual consumption habits when climate chaos is under discussion. Bill McKibben made the case against them in 2008:


Say you have a certain amount of time and money with which to make change – call it x, since that is what we mathematicians call things. The trick is to increase that x by multiplication, not addition. The trick is to take that 5 percent of people who really care and make them count for far more than 5 percent. And the trick to that is democracy.

That is, private individual actions don’t increase at a rate sufficient to affect the problem in a timely fashion; collective action seeking changes in policy and law can.

Too, the goal of personal virtue is merely not to be part of the problem. It’s not good enough for a bystander to say “I personally am not murdering this person” when someone is being stabbed to death before them (and those of us in the global north have countless ties to systems that are murdering the climate, so we are not exactly bystanders). The goal for those of us with any kind of resources of time, rights and a voice, must be being part of the solution, pushing for system change. To stop the murder.

Underlying this is a conflict in how we imagine ourselves, as consumers or as citizens. Consumers define themselves by what they buy, own, watch – or don’t. Citizens see themselves as part of civil society, as actors in the political system (and by citizen I don’t mean people who hold citizenship status, but those who participate, as noncitizens often do quite powerfully). Too, even personal virtue is made more or less possible by the systems that surround us. If you have solar panels on your roof, it’s because there’s a market and manufacturers for solar and installers and maybe an arrangement with your power company to compensate you for energy you’re putting into the grid.

In my own case, some of what I could tout as personal virtue is only possible because of collective action. I have 100% clean electricity at home because people organized to make that option and the solar and wind power behind it available. I do some of my errands by bicycle because the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition worked for decades to put bicycle paths across the city and otherwise make it safer to get about on two wheels. I can take public transit because there is public transit. Across the Bay, the city of Berkeley led the way in making all-electric houses the standard for the future; more than fifty California cities and counties have followed suit. Paired with the clean electricity California has committed to, this mandate matters. Having an all-electric house or driving an electric car fueled by renewables won’t be a virtuous choice in the future; it’ll just be the norm.

But individual and collective action don’t have to be pitted against each other. Individual choices do add up (they just don’t, in McKibben’s terms, multiply). That vegan options are available at a lot of fast-food chains is because enough consumers have created a profitable market for them. We do influence others through our visible choices. Ideas spread, values spread, habits spread; we are social animals and both good and bad behaviors are contagious. (For the bad, just look at the contagiousness of specious anti-vaccination arguments.)

Vegetarian and vegan diets (and low-meat or no-red-meat diets) have become far more common, creating markets for new products and different menus. But they have not made the beef industry go away or reformed its devastating climate impact. Climate chaos demands we recognize how everything is connected. Seeing yourself as a citizen means seeing yourself as connected to social and political systems. As citizens we must go after the climate footprint of the fossil-fuel corporations, the beef industry, the power companies, the transportation system, plastics, and so much more.


Rebecca Solnit is a Guardian US columnist. She is the author of Men Explain Things to Me and The Mother of All Questions. Her most recent book is Recollections of My Nonexistence
KENNEY WASTED OUR $$$ ON IT
U.S. report finds multiple problems with Keystone pipeline

Mon, August 23, 2021

FILE PHOTO: A supply depot servicing the Keystone XL crude oil pipeline lies idle in Oyen


WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. government watchdog found multiple problems with the construction, manufacture and design of the Keystone pipeline, validating President Joe Biden's decision to revoke the permit for a Keystone XL extension, leaders of several House Democratic committees said on Monday.

The lawmakers requested the Government Accountability Office report in November 2019 after more than 11,000 barrels of oil leaked from the pipeline system in two releases in less than two years.

"GAO found that preventable construction issues contributed to the current Keystone pipeline’s spills more frequently than the industry-wide trends," they said in a statement.


Keystone's four largest spills were "caused by issues related to the original design, manufacturing of the pipe, or construction of the pipeline," the GAO report said.

Biden canceled Keystone XL's permit on his first day in office on Jan. 20, dealing a death blow to a project that would have carried 830,000 barrels per day of heavy oil sands crude from Alberta to Nebraska. [L1N2JX1D8]

"TC Energy’s record among its peers is one of the worst in terms of volume of oil spilled per mile transported," a statement from the lawmakers said. The lawmakers included Representative Frank Pallone, energy and commerce committee chair.

TC Energy Corp officially canceled the $9 billion Keystone XL in June. It filed a notice of intent in July to begin a legacy North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) claim and is seeking more than $15 billion in damages from the U.S. government.

The company did not immediately respond on Monday to a request for comment.

Pipeline opponents want to slow the movement of Canadian oil to the United States. But pipeline supporters say it will be shipped anyway and that oil sent by rail has caused numerous fiery accidents.

Biden "was clearly right to question this operator’s ability to construct a safe and resilient pipeline, and we support his decision to put Americans’ health and environment above industry interests,” the U.S. representatives said.

(Reporting by Doina Chiacu and Timothy Gardner; Editing by Barbara Lewis and Dan Grebler)

GAO report finds multiple problems with Keystone pipeline

ReutersStaff
Published Monday, August 23, 2021


In this Dec. 18, 2020 photo, pipes to be used for the Keystone XL pipeline are stored in a field near Dorchester, Neb. (Chris Machian /Omaha World-Herald via AP)

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. government watchdog found multiple problems with the construction, manufacture and design of the Keystone XL pipeline, validating President Joe Biden's decision to revoke its permit, leaders of several House Democratic committees said on Monday.

The committee leaders requested the Government Accountability Office report in November 2019 after more than 11,000 barrels crude oil leaked from the pipeline in two releases in less than two years.

"In its thorough review of the pipeline’s history and construction, GAO found that preventable construction issues contributed to the current Keystone pipeline’s spills more frequently than the industry-wide trends," they said in a statement.


Related Stories
Energy company wants US$15 billion from the Biden administration for blocking the Keystone XL pipeline

TC Energy Q2 earnings slip to $982M but comparable profits up 21 per cent

Keystone's four largest spills were "caused by issues related to the original design, manufacturing of the pipe, or construction of the pipeline," the GAO report said.

Biden canceled Keystone XL's permit on his first day in office on Jan. 20, dealing a death blow to a long-gestating project that would have carried 830,000 barrels per day of heavy oil sands crude from Alberta to Nebraska.

"TC Energy’s record among its peers is one of the worst in terms of volume of oil spilled per mile transported," a statement from the lawmakers said.

They included Representatives Peter DeFazio, transportation committee chairman, Frank Pallone, energy and commerce committee chair, Donald Payne, chair of a subcommittee on railroads and pipelines and Bobby Rush, chair of a subcommittee on energy. the lawmakers said.

"President Biden was clearly right to question this operator’s ability to construct a safe and resilient pipeline, and we support his decision to put Americans’ health and environment above industry interests,” they said.

(Reporting by Doina Chiacu; editing by Barbara Lewis)


Democrats argue new report on Keystone pipelines bolsters Biden cancellation

BY RACHEL FRAZIN - 08/23/21 

© Getty Images

A group of House Democrats is arguing that a new report on spills from the Keystone Pipeline System boosts President Biden’s case for canceling the Keystone XL, which would’ve formed part of the network.

Reps. Frank Pallone Jr. (N.J.), Peter DeFazio (Ore.), Bobby Rush (Ill.), and Donald Payne Jr. (N.J.) said in a joint statement that the new Government Accountability Office (GAO) report “validates President Biden’s decision to revoke the permit to build the Keystone XL pipeline.”

“In its thorough review of the pipeline’s history and construction, GAO found that preventable construction issues contributed to the current Keystone pipeline’s spills more frequently than the industry-wide trends,” said the Democratic lawmakers, who chair the House Energy and Commerce Committee, the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, and subcommittees on energy and railroads, pipelines and hazardous materials, respectively.

“In fact, GAO found that, while corrosion was the industry’s leading cause of such accidents on crude oil pipelines, half of Keystone’s accidents were caused by material failure of the pipe or weld," they added. “President Biden was clearly right to question this operator’s ability to construct a safe and resilient pipeline, and we support his decision to put Americans’ health and environment above industry interests.”

The report determined that since 2010, Keystone’s accident history is similar to that of other pipelines, but that its record has worsened in recent years. It particularly cited two more recent spills — one in 2017 and another in 2019 — that accounted for about 93 percent of the total barrels of oil released from the vessel network over the course of a decade.

How Keystone’s operator TC Energy fared compared to its peers varied based on the time period and metrics used in the report.

Using a government measure of the number of accidents impacting people and the environment per total miles of pipeline, the GAO said TC Energy was “consistently” better than the national average, though “less so” in recent years.

Over the five-year period of 2016 to 2020, TC was around average, ranking 43rd out of 80 operators when measuring from the fewest accidents to the most.

In terms of volume of oil spilled per barrel-mile of transport, TC was better than average over the past decade, worse than average of the past five years and better than average for the past three years.

The report said that Keystone’s accidents were more likely to be caused by construction issues, approximately half of those impacting people or the environment, compared to 12 percent industrywide.

In a letter accompanying the report, TC Executive Vice President Leslie Kass said that safety is a “core value” for the company. Kass also said that it had taken additional measures to improve safety, including a new tool that allows it to detect imperfections more easily.

The Keystone Pipeline System stretches across nearly 3,000 miles and delivers crude oil around North America.

The Keystone XL Pipeline, which became a flashpoint in the environmental debate surrounding pipelines, would’ve added an additional route from Canada to Nebraska.

Biden nixed a permit that would’ve allowed the new pipeline to cross the U.S.-Canada border, ultimately leading to its downfall.

The move was polarizing, leading to cheers from many environmentalists but significant pushback from Republicans.
Climate change is an infrastructure problem – map of electric vehicle chargers shows one reason why

















While a gas station might be 72 miles away, an EV charger may be much farther. 
Pgiam via Getty Images

August 23, 2021 

Most of America’s 107,000 gas stations can fill several cars every five or 10 minutes at multiple pumps. Not so for electric vehicle chargers – at least not yet. Today the U.S. has around 43,000 public EV charging stations, with about 106,000 outlets. Each outlet can charge only one vehicle at a time, and even fast-charging outlets take an hour to provide 180-240 miles’ worth of charge; most take much longer.

The existing network is acceptable for many purposes. But chargers are very unevenly distributed; almost a third of all outlets are in California. This makes EVs problematic for long trips, like the 550 miles of sparsely populated desert highway between Reno and Salt Lake City. “Range anxiety” about longer trips is one reason electric vehicles still make up fewer than 1% of U.S. passenger cars and trucks.

This uneven, limited charging infrastructure is one major roadblock to rapid electrification of the U.S. vehicle fleet, considered crucial to reducing the greenhouse gas emissions driving climate change.

It’s also a clear example of how climate change is an infrastructure problem – my specialty as a historian of climate science at Stanford University and editor of the book series “Infrastructures.”
The Conversation, CC BY-ND

Over many decades, the U.S. has built systems of transportation, heating, cooling, manufacturing and agriculture that rely primarily on fossil fuels. The greenhouse gas emissions those fossil fuels release when burned have raised global temperature by about 1.1°C (2°F), with serious consequences for human lives and livelihoods, as the recent report from the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change demonstrates.

The new assessment, like its predecessor Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C, shows that minimizing future climate change and its most damaging impacts will require transitioning quickly away from fossil fuels and moving instead to renewable, sustainable energy sources such as wind, solar and tidal power.

That means reimagining how people use energy: how they travel, what and where they build, how they manufacture goods and how they grow food.
Gas stations were transport infrastructure, too

Gas-powered vehicles with internal combustion engines have completely dominated American road transportation for 120 years. That’s a long time for path dependence to set in, as America built out a nationwide system to support vehicles powered by fossil fuels.

Gas stations are only the endpoints of that enormous system, which also comprises oil wells, pipelines, tankers, refineries and tank trucks – an energy production and distribution infrastructure in its own right that also supplies manufacturing, agriculture, heating oil, shipping, air travel and electric power generation.

Without it, your average gas-powered sedan wouldn’t make it from Reno to Salt Lake City either.

Gas-powered vehicles have dominated U.S. road transportation for 120 years and have a web of infrastructure supporting them. Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images

Fossil fuel combustion in the transport sector is now America’s largest single source of the greenhouse gas emissions causing climate change. Converting to electric vehicles could reduce those emissions quite a bit. A recent life cycle study found that in the U.S., a 2021 battery EV – charged from today’s power grid – creates only about one-third as much greenhouse gas emissions as a similar 2021 gasoline-powered car. Those emissions will fall even further as more electricity comes from renewable sources.

Despite higher upfront costs, today’s EVs are actually less expensive than gas-powered cars due to their greater energy efficiency and many fewer moving parts. An EV owner can expect to save US$6,000-$10,000 over the car’s lifetime versus a comparable conventional car. Large companies including UPS, FedEx, Amazon and Walmart are already switching to electric delivery vehicles to save money on fuel and maintenance.

All this will be good news for the climate – but only if the electricity to power EVs comes from low-carbon sources such as solar, tidal, geothermal and wind. (Nuclear is also low-carbon, but expensive and politically problematic.) Since our current power grid relies on fossil fuels for about 60% of its generating capacity, that’s a tall order.

To achieve maximal climate benefits, the electric grid won’t just have to supply all the cars that once used fossil fuels. Simultaneously, it will also need to meet rising demand from other fossil fuel switchovers, such as electric water heaters, heat pumps and stoves to replace the millions of similar appliances currently fueled by fossil natural gas.
The infrastructure bill

The 2020 Net-Zero America study from Princeton University estimates that engineering, building and supplying a low-carbon grid that could displace most fossil fuel uses would require an investment of around $600 billion by 2030.

The infrastructure bill now being debated in Congress was originally designed to get partway to that goal. It initially included $157 billion for EVs and $82 billion for power grid upgrades. In addition, $363 billion in clean energy tax credits would have supported low-carbon electric power sources, along with energy storage to provide backup power during periods of high demand or reduced output from renewables. During negotiations, however, the Senate dropped the clean energy credits altogether and slashed EV funding by over 90%.

Of the $15 billion that remains for electric vehicles, $2.5 billion would purchase electric school buses, while a proposed EV charging network of some 500,000 stations would get $7.5 billion – about half the amount needed, according to Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm.

As for the power grid, the infrastructure bill does include about $27 billion in direct funding and loans to improve grid reliability and climate resilience. It would also create a Grid Development Authority under the U.S. Department of Energy, charged with developing a national grid capable of moving renewable energy throughout the country.

The infrastructure bill may be further modified by the House before it reaches President Joe Biden’s desk, but many of the elements that were dropped have been added to another bill that’s headed for the House: the $3.5 trillion budget plan.

As agreed to by Senate Democrats, that plan incorporates many of the Biden administration’s climate proposals, including tax credits for solar, wind and electric vehicles; a carbon tax on imports; and requirements for utilities to increase the amount of renewables in their energy mix. Senators can approve the budget by simple majority vote during “reconciliation,” though by then it will almost certainly have been trimmed again.

[Over 100,000 readers rely on The Conversation’s newsletter to understand the world. Sign up today.]

Overall, the bipartisan infrastructure bill looks like a small but genuine down payment on a more climate-friendly transport sector and electric power grid, all of which will take years to build out.

But to claim global leadership in avoiding the worst potential effects of climate change, the U.S. will need at least the much larger commitment promised in the Democrats’ budget plan.

Like an electric car, that commitment will seem expensive upfront. But as the recent IPCC report reminds us, over the long term, the potential savings from avoided climate risks like droughts, floods, wildfires, deadly heat waves and sea level rise would be far, far larger.


Author
Paul N. Edwards
William J. Perry Fellow in International Security, Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University
Disclosure statement
Paul N. Edwards is one of 234 Lead Authors of the 2021 Working Group I report for the Sixth Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. This article reflects his personal views. His previous work relevant to this article was funded by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation.


Science a 'weapon,' Kansas (R) Sen. Mike Thompson says. 
TRUE! 
AGAINST IGNORANCE & IRRATIONALITY!
Climate change experts fact-check him.

Jason Tidd
Topeka Capital-Journal
KANSAS



Do humans and carbon dioxide have no effect on climate change? Is science being weaponized, and are scientists comparable to Nazi propagandists?


That's what one politician told the Kansas Independent Oil & Gas Association during its annual convention in Wichita last week. Sen. Mike Thompson, a Republican from Shawnee, is the chair of the Senate utilities committee. He is also a retired meteorologist.

The convention was held one week after the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's sixth assessment report was released. International officials referred to its findings as a "code red for humanity."


More:'Code red for humanity': UN report gives stark warning on climate change, says wild weather events will worsen

Following are eight claims Thompson made during a seminar on "The Weaponization of Climate Science" — and what the climate experts at the University of Kansas contacted by The Topeka Capital-Journal had to say in response.


Do humans have 'zero control' over climate change?


Thompson: "Climate change has been happening since Earth has been around naturally, natural cycles, with stuff that's more powerful than anything humans can do. And so it's pure hubris to think that we should be spending billions of dollars — or now trillions of dollars — on mitigating climate change for something we have zero control over. And that includes trying to change our energy policy to fit that by going more green, with the renewables, which are not reliable."

Kees Van der Veen(Department of Geography & Atmospheric Science professor): "As reported in the IPCC Report, we cannot explain recent temperature trends (i.e. over the last century or so) without taking into account the warming effect from anthropogenically produced carbon dioxide. That is, natural processes (volcanos, solar activity, etc) are not enough to explain the recent warming trend. See Figure TS.7 in the Technical Summary of the WGI IPCC Report that was just published."

More:  Kansas senator compares climate change message to Nazi propaganda. Here's what else was said at oil convention.


Does burning fossil fuels and increasing carbon dioxide affect climate change?


Thompson: "We can burn fossil fuels. We can put things into the environment that might change the environment, but it's not going to change the climate. Reducing CO2 will have nothing to do with changing the climate on this planet. ... CO2 is a greenhouse gas, but it's a very tiny one. Water vapor does 95% of the stabilization of the temperature of this planet. ... With carbon dioxide right now, we could double, triple quadruple the amount of CO2, it is not going to change the amount of warming on this planet or the temperature on this planet at all."

Van der Veen: "Burning fossil fuels releases carbon dioxide: any hydrocarbon source (fossil fuel) plus oxygen produces carbon dioxide and water, plus a lot of energy that we as society use. This is a straight-forward chemical reaction.

"It has been known since the 19th century that CO2 is a greenhouse gas (from laboratory experiments conducted at the time). No one denies this and every introductory textbook will tell you that conditions on Earth are favorable for life as we know it exactly because of greenhouse gases in our atmosphere. Compare conditions on Mars (no atmosphere to speak of) and Venus (atmosphere consisting of 96% carbon dioxide). If we look over the last million years, temperature variations corresponding with glacial cycles are linked with similar variations in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Water vapor is indeed a strong greenhouse gas that is likely to amplify warming brought about by carbon dioxide — this is called a positive feedback in the climate system."

Does green and renewable energy work, and is it reliable?

Thompson: "The renewables, which are not reliable. Green energy, which doesn't work. ... And of course, it's green, but it kills the birds. And, of course, it's full of all sorts of toxic materials. And then during the course of a winter outbreak ... look what provided the energy, it was oil and it was gas, and it was coal."

Shannon O'Lear(director of the Environmental Studies Program and a Department of Geography & Atmospheric Science professor): "The fossil fuel based infrastructure on which much of the world relies would not be possible without considerable and sustained government subsidies and support of large corporations. What could it look like if renewable energy received the same amount of support and protection? Energy storage solutions mean that wind power can still be effective even if the wind is not blowing right now. Granted, expanding renewable energy will require a new business model, because key inputs such as wind and solar radiation are freely available, do not require international trade agreements, and do not generate waste that requires additional problem solving."

Van der Veen: "One might want to expand one's view to other countries, such as Germany and elsewhere in Europe where 'green energy' plays a greater role in society and increasingly replaces fossil fuels as energy source."
Is becoming net carbon neutral by 2050 possible?

Thompson: "BP, Exxon Mobil, they all put the promos on Sunday morning, they have the windmills and everything. They say they're gonna go net carbon neutral by 2050, or whatever year it is. It's impossible to do, it's virtually impossible to do. And a lot of it has to do with these ESG standards, because they are being forced into these ESG standards by financial institutions. ... it's a complete distortion of our economy."

Van der Veen: "Where there is (political) will there is a way — who would have imagined the Internet only three decades ago or the phenomenal growth in online retail, spurred on by Amazon? — just to name one example of rapid societal changes occurring despite naysayers stating it could not be done."



Does global warming exist, and can it kill people?


Thompson: "Science has just become a weapon. So we basically turned real science into we're all gonna die in 12 years, OK. And unfortunately, this is the culmination of the dumbing down of America. People buy this stuff. They hear it on the news. They think global warming is real. We're all gonna die."

Van der Veen: "Strawman argument – no credible scientist will say that we are all going to die, let alone in 12 years! But one has only to look around to see impacts of warming already happening, be it more frequent storms, tornados and landslides brought on by wildfires or clear-day flooding in Miami.

"It would be wise for politicians and other officials to read the actual IPCC Reports — or at least the appropriately titled 'Summary for Policy Makers.' These Reports are a far cry from the sensationalist headlines or sound bites that Senator Thompson apparently attributes to science."
Are mitigation strategies, such as carbon sequestration, a waste of money?

Thompson: "From the climate mitigation standpoint, there really, like I said, if you look, there really isn't much we can do. We could spend money, but it would be fruitless. The climate is going to change on its own. … Bottom line is, there's nothing we can do to change the climate. Nothing at all.

"CO2 sequestration sounds like the dumbest idea I've ever seen in my life."

Van der Veen: "I agree that CO2 sequestration, or any other proposed geo-engineering 'solution' is not a real or permanent solution and mostly a waste of money (and energy!!)"

Would more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere be good for agriculture?

Thompson: "If you do some studies on carbon dioxide, plants thrive at high levels of CO2. ... In fact, there was a Harvard study that showed plants are hardier, more drought resistant, produce more crops at about 1200 parts per million — three times what we have in the atmosphere right now. So it's actually beneficial to have more CO2. And since we've seen higher levels of CO2, we've seen a greening of the planet. We've seen a lot more forestation we've seen a lot more green, which counteracts any potential warming that we have.

O'Lear: "Although plants may grow larger leaves with increased levels of CO2, the nutrient quality in those plants becomes diluted and causes knock down effects throughout the foodchain. Research at Kansas State University has demonstrated this point and why it is a concern both for agriculture and for ecosystem resilience. For instance, lowering the nutritional value of biomass could lead to a decline in some species of grasshoppers only to contribute to swarms of other species of grasshoppers that could damage crops. Beyond grasshoppers, other species and types of animals could be negatively affected."

More:Tallgrass of the Kansas prairie is changing along with the climate. It's now grasshopper-killing junk food.


Is messaging on climate change comparable to Nazi propaganda?


Thompson: "Why are we spending billions and billions of dollars subsidizing an energy source that we cannot rely on when we absolutely need it. It's just basically because of propaganda. And you go back to the Nazi era, this guy Edward Bernays actually helped Woodrow Wilson institute, he helped some big tobacco companies institute smoking in America, promote smoking. And basically he said, you know, you tell a lie big enough, you keep telling it, eventually it becomes true. That's what's happening in America today. And Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi propaganda minister, actually studied Bernays, because he knew it worked. He saw that it worked.

"And of course, if you control the language, you control the narrative. And what has happened since we started on this global warming or climate change path, is that ... they have controlled the language."

O'Lear: In response to the comments on energy subsidies: "This point is true for fossil fuels in our current, deeply networked system. Case in point: the recent cyber attack on the Colonial Pipeline and the resulting gas shortages on the East coast."

More:Colonial Pipeline reportedly pays $5M in cryptocurrency to hackers to end ransomware cyberattack

Van der Veen: "Or think back to the last hurricane hitting the Gulf Coast and disrupting energy supplies and following temporary shortages and price hikes.

"It is interesting that Senator Thompson brings up Edward Bernays and his influence on advertising. As documented extensively by Naomi Oreskes and Erik Conway in their book 'Merchants of Doubt' many of the strategies developed by Bernays and the advertising agency Hill and Knowlton originally for the tobacco industry, were later used by the fossil fuel lobby to discredit or deny the reality of climate change cause by humans burning fossil fuels.

"And one could argue that some continue to deploy these tactics to discredit or deny climate change."
ONTARIO

One Kids Place workers' union votes for strike mandate

Conciliation date set for Sept. 16

Author of the article: Michael Lee

Publishing date: Aug 17, 2021 • 
One Kids Place staff, represented by the Ontario Public Service Employees Union, have voted in favour of a strike mandate. The union has cited a new working hours model as an outstanding issue. PJ Wilson/The Nugget

Unionized workers at One Kids Place in North Bay have voted in favour of possible strike action.

Members represented by the Ontario Public Service Employees Union (OPSEU) voted 97 per cent in favour of a strike mandate, a statement Tuesday from the union said.

In total, the union says some 73 professionals represented by OPSEU delivered the mandate to its bargaining team.

“A strong strike vote hands the bargaining team a powerful tool,” OPSEU president Warren (Smokey) Thomas said in union’s statement.

“It tells management that members are solidly behind their team, even if it means a strike. It’s a clear sign the employer is on the wrong track.”

One Kids Place is a charitable, non-profit organization that provides a range of services, including occupational therapy, speech-language therapy, physiotherapy, social work, therapeutic recreation, an infant hearing program, autism services and clinics.

Staff at One Kids Place have been without a contract since March 31, the union says.

Although members have voted in favour of a strike mandate, a strike will not happen right away.

OPSEU regional vice-president Tara Maszczakiewicz from OPSEU Region 6 told The Nugget that a conciliation date has been set for Sept. 16.

If no resolution is found, a conciliation officer will report the outcome to the Minister of Labour, Training and Skills Development. The minister will then send a written notice to the union and employer, commonly known as a ‘no board’ report.

A legal strike or lockout can then begin 17 days later, prior to which the parties can continue negotiating.

In the statement from the union, Maszczakiewicz says most matters have been settled, with the exception of the employer’s attempt to impose a new model for working hours.

“OKP employees have long been successfully flexing hours to meet client needs,” she said.

“Now the employer wants to impose a casual-worker model, where hours can change from day-to-day, week-to-week, with limited ability to flex hours.”

Maszczakiewicz told The Nugget that most members have extra responsibilities caring for children or elderly parents.

“The employer’s model would cause upheaval to members’ lives and would affect services to the children they care for,” Maszczakiewicz is quoted saying in OPSEU’s statement. “This is not acceptable and we’ll stand our ground on this.”

One Kids Place executive director Brenda Loubert said she is limited in what she can comment on regarding the negotiations, but said she hopes a resolution will be reached.

She added that there always are opportunities to go back to the table, even with a ‘no board’ report.

mlee@postmedia.com

Nepalese Gurkhas end hunger strike over UK military pensions


Veterans call off ‘fast unto death’ strike after 13 days as British officials agree to talks over pension rights grievances.

Gurkha military veteran Dhan Gurung, who served as a corporal in the British 

Army's 2nd Gurkha Regiment, takes part in a 24-hour stint of a 13-day hunger 

strike opposite the front gates of Downing Street in London, on Monday, 

July 26, 2021 [Matt Dunham /AP]

Nepalese Gurkha military veterans have ended a 13-day hunger strike after the United Kingdom’s government agreed to discuss their longstanding grievances over pension rights.

Thousands of Gurkhas, who are renowned as hard and loyal fighters, have served in the British army but until 2007, did not enjoy the same pay and conditions as British soldiers.

Those who served before 1997 still receive only a fraction of their British counterparts’ salary as it was assumed they would return to Nepal after leaving the army, where the cost of living is significantly lower.

Gurkha veterans previously lost a legal challenge against the situation, and say it has left some 25,000 older Nepalese veterans out of pocket.

The Gurka Equal Rights group tweeted that on Thursday, British officials agreed to talks with the Nepalese Embassy over the issue.

“The hunger strike has now been called off! Thank you everyone for your support and love,” the group said.

The UK’s Ministry of Defence said it was “happy” the group ended the strike and that it looked forward “to meeting with the group next month alongside the Nepali Ambassador to move forward together”.

“Our primary concern is always the health and welfare of our serving personnel and veterans, and this strike was not a course of action we encouraged,” the ministry said in a statement.

Protester hospitalised

The “fast unto death” strikers had camped under makeshift shelters opposite British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s Downing Street office for nearly two weeks.

One protester, Dhan Gurung, was taken to hospital on Wednesday. His wife, Dev Kumari Gurung, dismissed reports he had a heart attack.

He had been feeling weak and had high blood pressure but was determined to carry on, she told the AFP news agency.

Surrounded by flowers and candles left by supporters, the demonstrators wanted the government to resolve their complaints about alleged discrimination and inequalities.

The Gurkhas have become renowned for their loyalty and bravery since they first served as part of the Indian army in British-ruled India in 1815.

Some 200,000 Gurkhas fought alongside British troops in both world wars, as well as the conflicts in the Falklands, Iraq and Afghanistan.

There are about 2,700 Gurkhas currently enlisted in Britain’s armed forces.

SOURCE: NEWS AGENCIES

BC

Rio Tinto, union to meet THIS week as Kitimat aluminum smelter strike enters fourth week

While the meeting will not involve negotiations, it does give both sides another opportunity to discuss a framework for moving forward.

riotintokitimatstrike
Rio Tinto workers on strike in Kitimat pictured on July 28. As the strike enters its fourth week, officials from Rio Tinto and Unifor Local 23o1 will meet in Vancouver next week to see if negotiations can be renewed.

As the Kitimat aluminium smelter strike enters its fourth week, Rio Tinto and the union will hold another meeting in Vancouver next week to see if negotiations about a collective agreement can be renewed.

On Aug. 12, a similar meeting was held in Kitimat between top officials from Rio Tinto’s Montreal headquarters and Unifor Local 2301’s president to see if negotiations could resume between both parties in hopes of ending the stroke at the aluminum smelter which began in July 25.

However, no updates were provided by Rio Tinto or Unifor as to what happened during the Aug. 12, meeting and if both parties would head back to the table.

Information about next week’s meeting was sent out to Rio Tinto employees through a company memo on Aug. 17.

“After the meeting held on August 12 and follow up conversations, Rio Tinto and Unifor Local 2301 have agreed to meet early next week in Vancouver with a view to assess the potential restart of negotiations between parties,” said Rio Tinto in the memo.

While the meeting will not involve negotiations, it does give both sides another opportunity to discuss a framework for moving forward.

The memo also states that both parties have agreed that no other communication would be made until next week’s discussion takes place.

The strike began in Kitimat on July 25 after seven weeks of failed bargaining efforts between Unifor and Rio Tinto on matters of employee benefits and use of contractors among other issues.

No details have been provided as to what’s involved in contract talks save for the union which published information stating the company was proposing a series of benefits reductions.

Rio Tinto has denied that allegation but has not provided details on what it did propose, stating the contents of the negotiations to be confidential.

Local governments and leaders, including the District of Kitimat, City of Terrace, Haisla Nation, Skeena BC Liberal MLA Ellis Ross and NDP MP Taylor Bachrach called on Rio Tinto and Unifor Local 2301 to resume talks amidst fear of economic disruptions in northwest B.C.

Rio Tinto strike not impacting Nechako River levels

Water flow on the river is more then 30% above the seasonal average
I WOULD SAY THAT IS AN IMPACT FOR THE BETTER
WATER IS LIFE

Nechako River WEB
Water levels on the Nechako River were above average where it crosses under the Cameron Street Bridge on Friday.

Water flow on the Nechako River is more than 30 per cent above average for this time of year, but the cause has more to do with snow than aluminum, according to a local expert.
Rio Tinto operates the Nechako Reservoir to provide water to its hydro-electric power facility at Kemano. The Kemano generating station powers the company’s Kitimat aluminum smelter, which is running at 25 per cent capacity due to a four-week-long strike by workers. Water from the reservoir flows to generate power at Kemano, and into the Nechako River via the Skins Lake Spillway and the Cheslatta River.
Wayne Salewski, president of the Vanderhoof-based Nechako Environment and Water Stewardship Society, said he hasn’t seen any changes in Rio Tinto’s operation of the Skins Lake Spillway since the start of the strike by Unifor members in Kitimat.
“(The Nechako) is a little high. The river was really full,” Salewski said. “One of the reasons is the snowpack on the mountains… was above average by quite a bit. That resulted in a tremendous amount of inflow into the reservoir.”
Levels on the Nechako Reservoir went from being below-average last year to essentially full-capacity by this summer, he said.
According to data reported online by Rio Tinto the Nechako Reservoir level peaked at just above 2,799 feet in mid-July, roughly two feet above typical reservoir levels. As of Thursday, the reservoir had dropped to 2,796.84 feet – roughly half a foot above typical levels.
Salewski said he’s spent more than 100 hours on the river this summer, and seen “just a nice, continuous flow through” the Skins Lake Spillway.
Water flow on the Nechako at Vanderhoof on Thursday was measured at 318.78 cubic metres per second – 31 per cent above the seasonal average of 243 cubic metres per second. Water discharge from the Skins Lake Spillway was more than 105 cubic metres per second above the summer minimum level of 170 cubic metres per second.
Rio Tinto is continuing to run the Kemano power station and is selling the surplus power to the BC Hydro grid, Salewski said. A spokesperson for Rio Tinto confirmed that.
“The demand for electricity this summer was extraordinary, with the heat,” Salewski said.
Operation of the Kemano power station has been deemed an essential service the BC Labour Relations Board, allowing it to continue operations during the strike.
“Our top priority in the watershed is to continue managing the Kemano hydro-power facility and the Nechako Reservoir safely, to protect the environment and the diverse interests of our host communities,” a Rio Tinto spokesperson said in an email.
Power demand at the Kitimat smelter is only one factor in making river flow decision, and regular adjustments are made based on current and projected weather.
Negotiations between Rio Tinto and Uniform Local 2301 are expected to resume in Vancouver next week, according to a company memo issued to employees on Tuesday. The strike began on July 25, after seven weeks of failed bargaining efforts regarding issues of employee benefits and the use of contractors, along with other issues.
-    With files from Binny Pau, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter/Terrace Standard