Wednesday, February 19, 2020

61% of Canadians oppose Wet’suwet’en solidarity blockades, 75% back action to help Indigenous people: poll

BY PHIL HEIDENREICH GLOBAL NEWS Posted February 19, 2020 4:01 am


https://globalnews.ca/video/rd/bc1da604-52ce-11ea-aec6-0242ac110003/?jwsource=cl
WATCH ABOVE: The results of a new Ipsos poll done exclusively for Global News reveal that more than half of Canadians disagree with railway blockades aimed at showing solidarity with members of the Wet'suwet'en Nation that oppose a natural gas pipeline on their land.

A new poll suggests that while nearly two-thirds of Canadians disagree with the ongoing Wet’suwet’en solidarity blockades that are interrupting rail and truck traffic, three-quarters of Canadians also think the federal government needs to act immediately to address quality of life issues affecting the country’s Indigenous people.

RELATED NEWS
Why the 1990 Oka Crisis is being evoked amid the Wet’suwet’en pipeline dispute
Wet’suwet’en protests: House of Commons holds emergency debate over rail blockades
Hereditary chiefs say they won’t meet with ministers until RCMP detachment removed

On Wednesday, Ipsos published a new poll conducted exclusively for Global News about the demonstrations that revolve around the construction of a natural gas pipeline in northern B.C. and which have gripped the country for weeks.

The survey results show 61 per cent of respondents disagree that the protesters blockading key transportation corridors are conducting justified and legitimate protests, compared to 39 per cent who said that they believe the protests are legitimate and justified.


“It’s the first poll that we’ve ever done on this issue,” Ipsos Public Affairs CEO Darrell Bricker told Global News. “The first takeaway is that Canadians are not pleased to see ports and railways blocked.

“In fact, they so don’t agree with it that almost half of Canadians — actually better than half, 53 per cent — actually think the police should move in and do something about it.”


READ MORE: Protesters blockade Port of Vancouver in solidarity with Wet’suwet’en

But Bricker noted that the numbers indicating strong views about protester tactics that are disrupting the national economy appear to come with somewhat of a caveat.

“What we also see in the polling is that… [75 per cent] of the people we interviewed are saying that something needs to be done about the plight of the Aboriginal community and that the government hasn’t performed particularly well on this,” he said.

“So there’s some understanding, I would say, for the plight of the Indigenous community, but the blocking of natural infrastructure is not necessarily supported.”TWEET THIS

READ MORE: Average Wet’suwet’en people caught in pipeline dispute crossfire, says wing chief

Tensions began to rise significantly on the Wet’suwet’en Nation on New Year’s Day when some members of the community served Coastal GasLink, the company that’s trying to build the pipeline, with an eviction notice, saying its workers were “currently trespassing” on their unceded territory.

A day earlier, the B.C. Supreme Court granted Coastal GasLink an injunction that called for the removal of any obstructions, including cabins, on any roads, bridges or work sites the company had been authorized to use.

Coastal GasLink says it has signed agreements with the elected councils of all 20 First Nations along the path of its $6.6-billion pipeline — including the Wet’suwet’en. However, some of the nation’s hereditary chiefs have been vehemently opposed to the project out of environmental concerns.

READ MORE: Band councils, hereditary chiefs – here’s what to know about Indigenous governance

The ensuing blockades by protesters expressing solidarity with the Wet’suwet’en hereditary chiefs who oppose the project have led to significant disruptions in parts of the country, and just last week, CN shut down its operations in Eastern Canada as a result.

On Sunday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau aborted his plans abroad and returned to Canada to deal with the crisis. An emergency debate was held about the impasse in the House of Commons on Tuesday night.

When asked about the government’s duty to consult with Indigenous communities on resource development projects, the poll results published on Wednesday show that only 56 per cent of respondents agree that Indigenous people are adequately consulted, and 44 per cent disagree.

“I think Canadians are still trying to sort through what is happening here,” Bricker said.TWEET THIS

“They are trying to reconcile two things in their minds: one of them is a legitimate concern that Canadians have about the situation and the plight of Aboriginal people in this country — it’s quite clear that there’s a fairly deep feeling that something needs to be done on that… but on the other hand, even though they feel that this is an important thing that needs to be dealt with, they don’t feel that protesting by shutting down rail lines and shutting down ports is the correct response.”

Bricker also noted that the poll indicates there’s a contrast among different regions in Canada in terms of how the events are being viewed.

For example, support for police intervention is highest in Alberta (69 per cent) and B.C. (68 per cent), while opposition to the use of law enforcement to end the blockades is highest in Quebec (38 per cent) followed by Ontario (29 per cent).

“This is one of the only issues I’ve seen in which British Columbia and Alberta actually align — when natural resources are concerned,” Bricker said, also noting the poll results suggest “younger Canadians are more aligned with the Aboriginal community.”

Bricker said while this marks Ipsos’ first poll on the latest blockades in Canada, his company did surveys related to Idle No More blockades in 2013 and revisited those figures after gathering data for its latest survey.

READ MORE: Alberta’s solicitor general says Idle No More roadblocks not safe

“Opposition to the Idle No More blockades was higher than what we’re seeing right now,” he pointed out.TWEET THIS

“But I should say that we’re just starting into this, we’ll see where this goes over time.”

No comments: