PeaceMaker Murdered In Iraq

Next week there will be mass demonstrations against the phony war on Terror.

Unfortunately the American occupation of Iraq has led to the death of the American PeaceMaker Tom Fox. One kidnapped peace activist found dead in Iraq

It is not just Fox who suffered and was tortured in Iraq. Under the continued occupation of Iraq, but so are the people of Iraq. They are being held hostage by the internecine battles of sectarian interests that have arisen from the occupation. Which is what the PeaceMakers were witnesses to and witnessing for in Iraq.

It is time to bring all the troops home, from Iraq and Afghanistan.

And to end the American bullying of Iran, which maybe the next front of Bush's phony War on Terror. Iran a 'grave' threat, says Bush

This would be the best tribute America could make for its fallen Peacemaker.

Annie Zirin
Leftwing Generals: the Dark Side of Liberal Imperialism

A Left that opposes the occupation of Iraq but accepts the overall war on terror will find itself inevitably on the side of supporting other wars and other occupations.

Fighting "terrorism"-imperialism's cover story

Noam Chomsky recently argued,

The fact of the matter is that there is no War on Terror. It's a minor consideration. So invading Iraq and taking control of the world's energy resources was way more important than the threat of terror. The U.S. invaded Iraq because it has enormous oil resources, mostly untapped, and it's right in the heart of the world's energy system. Which means that if the U.S. manages to control Iraq, it extends enormously its strategic power, what Zbigniew Brzezinski calls its critical leverage over Europe and Asia.3 In 2004, John Kerry ran a campaign based on the slogan that the war in Iraq was "distracting" the U.S. from its ability to fight the "global war on terror." This became a slogan that a section of the liberal-left was more than happy to adopt as its own. Because the unspoken aim of liberals and many leaders of antiwar organizations in 2006 is to elect a Democratic Congress in November, we have seen the consolidation of liberal critics of the Bush administration behind Democratic talking points. Unfortunately, in 2006, history appears to be repeating itself.

Liberal imperialism

We can hardly be surprised that a section of liberals continues to take their marching orders from the Democratic Party. There has always been a wing of American liberalism that has fully supported the project of U.S. imperialism, and their class interests find expression in the Democratic Party. These were the Cold War liberals that backed and helped prosecute the McCarthyite witch-hunts on communists and who were the architects of the Vietnam War. These were the liberals who supported Bill Clinton's "humanitarian" wars in the 1990s, and who saw economic sanctions on Iraq as an alternative to war. "The task of liberal realists," notes John Pilger, "is to ensure that western imperialism is interpreted as crisis management, rather than the cause of crisis and its escalation. By never recognizing western state terrorism, their complicity is assured."11

The Left in the U.S. needs to put forward an antiwar opposition on an entirely different basis. We must reject the idea that the U.S. has the moral authority to fight terrorism, when it is the leading cause of terror in the world. We must stand for the self-determination the people of Iraq, Iran, Palestine, and people around the world. We must reject Islamophobia and defend the Arab and Muslim communities in the U.S. who have been the victims of political persecution since September 11. We have to consistently and clearly expose the real imperialist interests behind the war on terror, as well as the history of U.S. imperialism, in order to build a stronger and wider foundation for our movement, and show how working-class people in the United States pay the price of the war on terror. The antiwar movement needs to remain independent, both in its political views and its organizing, from the Democratic Party that wants to strengthen U.S. imperialism, not to end it. The antiwar movement cannot oppose the occupation in Iraq while giving the U.S. a pass to wreak havoc elsewhere in the name of fighting the war on terror.

Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
Iraq, hostages, Christian, Peacemakers, Canada, US, Loney, Fox, kidnapped, death

The Butcher Of Serbia Dies

Slobodan Milosevic dies Good riddance to this Nationalist Socialist. He died in his cell not unlike another National Socialist; Rudolf Hess

Milosevic put Serbia on the map in the worst way, giving his people the reputation of a ruthless bunch addicted to violent nationalism. Mastery of the political scene gave him a supreme grip on power for years under a veneer of democracy.Milosevic carried his defiance to the end

Exactly which is why I titled this article as I did, for in his rabid Nationalism he as much destroyed Serbia as the UN/NATO forces did in the war over Kosovo. Which led to his downfall.



Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
Slobodan, Milosevic, Yugoslavia, dead, Serb, Serbia, Serbian, Kosovo, Butcher, War, Crimes,

Free Trade; Hong Kong & Somalia

I came across this well written essay at Dissident Voices, an anarchist-left compiliation blog. Its about Hong Kong, by Chohong Choi;Hong Kong’s “Free Market”: Someone Pays

Very lengthy, like some of the stuff I write here. But despite its length it's very informative. Well worth your time. I thought I would give you a flavour of it by presenting his conclusion.

And because Somalia is back in the news of late, and is the only 'real free market economy' with no government. I thought it was interesting that he concluded on that point as well. More on this at the end of Chohong Choi's missive.

Be Careful What You Wish for

Business always speculates on how much better it would be if government would just get out of the way and let free enterprise do its thing. It longs for some mythical time in the past when the businessman was on his own and things worked out fine. It sure hopes not. For it is the biggest user and beneficiary of public facilities like the courts, education, fire services, hospitals, infrastructure, the military, and the police. Not only does business rely on these resources, its employees and customers do too. Also, business utters nary a word when the government goes to bat for it by enacting favorable legislation and signing trade deals with foreign countries. It knows who hold the keys to power, and spares no effort to ingratiate itself with these movers and shakers, as well as to find as many backers as it can to represent its interests in the government.

It is not always a bad thing that Hong Kong’s economy is not as free as advertised. Its public facilities and regulations help ensure stability in the city and make it a livable and investable place. That is how a strong community is built. Hong Kong still suffers from crowdedness, pollution, stress, and a widening rich-poor gap, but its public sector, while not without fault, has succeeded more than it has failed. Even as Hong Kong’s business sector continues to preach the advantages of the “free market,” it is silently thankful for (just to name a few) its affordable public healthcare, which releases it from straining its resources to provide its employees with basic health coverage like employers in the U.S., and for its public safety measures, which spare it the expense of having to hire high-priced private security contractors to protect its assets à la post-Katrina New Orleans.

If Hong Kong was chosen as the site of the last WTO conference because it appeared to practice free trade and free market economics better than anyone else, then that makes sense. Free trade talks and deals are mostly razzle-dazzle anyway, as those players who can afford to flout the terms of any agreement do so with near impunity. Insiders and those at the short end of these pacts know better. Markets and trade are never free. Someone reaps the rewards, someone pays for the rewards, and someone certainly pays for its consequences.

If the closest thing to a truly free market is what you seek, then Hong Kong is not it. That place, according to one journalist, would more likely be Somalia. But there is no invisible hand at work in Somalia. If anything is invisible, it would be a functional national government, which has not been seen since 1991 (hence, no government regulations), as well as foreign aid (thus, no strings attached). Private enterprise exists in Somalia, and some of it works quite well given the circumstances. But even those in the private sector await the return of a working central government, which can help ensure stability and provide the framework for a smoother operation of society. Until then, rules are made by word of mouth and usually enforced at the point of a gun (the visible fist).

Any chance that the next WTO conference will be held in Mogadishu?

Heh, heh not likely eh. Recently some liberaltarians have been singing, or ringing, the praises of the free market in Somalia. Seriously, they have the largest cell/mobile phone system in the world. All set up amongst freely competing capitalists and their private armies, it make's the free (booty) marketers over at the Von Mises Institute drool. Unfortunately such anarchic capitalism is based on the primitive accumulation of capital, in otherwords brigandism and piracy. Gee just like the foundation of Hong Kong as the distribution centre of Opium into China, in the 19th Century.

Unfortunately the current minarchist capitalist free for all in Somalia while successful in producing a mobile phone business has not solved the problem of the current drought affecting the Horn of Africa. In fact the free market brigands and pirates have been detrimental to the attempts by the UN to get food to the starving masses.

Conflict and lawlessness in the Horn of Africa are making it far harder to get aid to those who need it. In particular, Somalia's pirates and warlords are disrupting shipping routes and delaying food deliveries.

The biggest security problems are in Somalia, which has had no central government for 15 years.

Even in the best of times in Somalia, when there's plenty of rain, warlords often wage battles. But in a time of drought, specialists warn that the stresses of survival will further unravel local power structures, creating new opportunities for havoc from freelance bandits, militias, and perhaps Islamic extremists aligned with Al Qaeda.

''Somalia has been an extraordinarily difficult country for the last 15 years," Christian Balslev Olesen, UNICEF's Somalia representative, said in an interview in Nairobi. ''We've had flooding, drought, conflict, war, and general insecurity. But we haven't seen anything like this drought for the past 25 years. . . . The worst scenario is that we might be going into huge drought with some kind of high-scale conflict. And bringing food into a security situation like Somalia for 2 million people is going to be a nightmare."

Last year, pirates hijacked two World Food Program ships carrying donated food. US Navy ships now patrol off the coast, but most shipping companies have refused to deliver to ports in Somalia. That means it takes up to a week longer for each shipment of food to come from the port in Mombasa, Kenya, and then be trucked to south and central Somalia

A woman and a girl stood in a field outside Wajid, Somalia, that has not produced a crop of sorghum, a grassy grain that is one of the foundations of the Somali diet, in two years. (John Donnelly/ Globe Staff)

Somalia is an excellent example of Anarcho-Capitalism in action. That is the theory that all state services could be privatized, including having private armies and police forces. Well that's Somalia. Look there for the future of this flawed ideology.

You see capitalism needs a State to function properly, as does business. Without the State, capitalism returns to its original state; fuedalism in decay. As Yemen has shown as well as Somalia.

Today, Yemen itself is on a dagger's edge, precariously balanced between forces of modernization and the pull of powerful traditionalists. In the West, Yemen may be best known for its recent history of tribal kidnappings of tourists, the 2000 al Qaeda attack on the USS Cole, and the ubiquitous chewing of khat, a mildly narcotic leaf. But the government has helped roll up several al Qaeda cells and, at least until a recent prison break, generally allayed western fears that terrorists would find sanctuary in the large tracts of lawless, tribal lands.
In deep denial. These days, though, Yemen is facing its own crisis, the result of deepening poverty and a government in denial about the depth of reforms needed to survive. In the past year, the United States and the World Bank have slashed their modest aid programs to Yemen, increasingly fed up with a bureaucracy that is one of the most corrupt in the world. "Yemen is teetering on the edge of failed statehood," warns one U.S. official. "It will either become a Somalia or get serious about transforming." For a nation awash in guns and crisscrossed by well-worn smuggling routes, the threat is grave.

And the capitalist state is not just any kind of government, it is a specific kind of government that regulates the market in favour of stability for the creation of monopolies. As the history of Hong Kong and of course British and American capitalism shows. This is the history that the right wing of course has always revised, whether it is the Heritage Foudation or the Von Mises Institute.

For as Herr Dr. Marx said the history of the world is the history of class struggle which the right has interpreted as the history of the world is the history of people clashing with the state. Which is only partially true, for in this assessment of the world, they forget people have developed self-government and that the masses revolutionary struggles have not been just over what kind of government should exist, but how the social relations of society should function.

In other words its not enough to just Smash the State in a fuedalistic society or a capitalist one. It is essential to change the means of production and distribution. The apologists for capitalism, see Somalia as a free market. It maybe, but it is not a self governing market, it is far from a society of Liberty, Equality and Solidarity.

Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
minarchism, anarchism, left-libertarian, libertarian, Somalia, Hong, Kong, Free, Market, capitalism, fuedalism, brigands, pirates, drought, Africa,

No See Um's

David Emerson is managing to be like the proverbial no-see-um's that plague Northern Manitoba and Ontario. Or perhaps he is hiding behind his hands, peeking out of his fingers hoping that the justly irate citizens of this constituency would go away. Because he has done all he can to avoid them.

But wait he has time to meet with the business folks in Vancouver when he is there, of course it had to be a super secret meeting, no publicity. This is the new openess in government we can expect from the Harpocrite autocracy.

Emerson heckled, protesters demand meeting
Emerson did find time however to speak to more than 400 people at a Vancouver Board of Trade dinner Wednesday evening, which went unpublicized either by the business group or Emerson's office.


Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
Emerson, Kingsway, Vancouver, Minister, of, Trade, Harper, PM, Government, Canada, politics, Conservatives, scandal, Shapiro,

Halliburton's Depleted Uranium Cover Up

File this story under the headline;

The Joys Of Privatization

Tony Blair is really Maggie Thatcher in drag, doing that Victor Victoria thing. As this story about the contracting out of a major British military establishment to Halliburton shows.

And meanwhile back in the USSA folks are all verklempt that a private British Company, good old P&O , currently contracted to run American ports is being sold to the UAE.

My guess is they would be happier if it was sold to Halliburton. I know Dick Cheney would be. And then Halliburtons cover ups of dangers to humanity could be excused as National Security.

Privatizing State functions means the state is no longer answerable to the public, to its citizens. The Privatized State is responsible to its stakeholders, that is the companies it contracts out to and their shareholders. This reveals the real meaning of 'stakeholder democracy' that Tony Blair and George Bush talk about.

Depleted uranium measured in British atmosphere from battlefields in the Middle East

by Leuren Moret

"Did the use of uranium weapons in Gulf War II result in contamination of Europe? Evidence from the measurements of the Atomic Weapons Establishment, Aldermaston, Berkshire, U.K.," shows such contamination, reported the Sunday Times Online, in a shocking scientific study authored by British scientists Dr. Chris Busby and Saoirse Morgan.

The highest levels of depleted uranium ever measured in the atmosphere in Britain were transported on air currents from the Middle East and Central Asia. Of special significance were those from the Tora Bora bombing in Afghanistan in 2001 and the "shock and awe" bombing during Gulf War II in Iraq in 2003.

Out of concern for the public, the official British government air monitoring facility, known as the Atomic Weapons Establishment, at Aldermaston, was established years ago to measure radioactive emissions from British nuclear power plants and atomic weapons facilities.

The British government facility was taken over three years ago by Halliburton, which refused at first to release air monitoring data to Dr. Busby, as required by law.

The fact that the air monitoring data was circulated by Halliburton AWE to the Defense Procurement Agency implies that it was considered to be relevant and that Dr. Busby was stonewalled because Halliburton AWE clearly recognized that it was a serious enough matter to justify a government interpretation of the results and official decisions had to be made about what the data would show and its political implications for the military.

In a similar circumstance, in 1992, Major Doug Rokke, the director of the U.S. Army Depleted Uranium Cleanup Project after Gulf War I, was ordered by a U.S. Army general officer to write a no-bid contract, "Depleted Uranium, Contaminated Equipment and Facilities Recovery Plan Outline," describing the procedures for cleaning up Kuwait, including depleted uranium, for Kellogg, Brown and Root, a subsidiary of Halliburton.

Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
Halliburton, UK, USA, Blair, Aldershot, Uranium, cover-up, depleted, radiation, Defense, Weapons, Gulf, War, Bush

Canada Out Of NATO

Another Progressive For War (PFW) the Galloping Beaver blogs on the background to the Canadian Forces operations in Afghanistan. He is cheered on by Cerberus, and cross posted it to the Torch. So now all the bases are covered.

Galloping Beaver compares the differences between Iraq and Afghanistan. Quite right too. Both operations are different. And as a progressive he is opposed to the war in Iraq but then he continues to try and justify the war in Afghanistan as different, more noble. Because it is sanctioned by the UN and NATO.

But then again when he says it is sanctioned by the UN and NATO let us not forget that so was the war on Serbia over Kosovo. And that mess is still going on. With no resoloution. So far neither the UN nor NATO sanctioned wars have had much success.

See my Seeing the Forest for the Trees
Thesis on The Kosovo Crisis and the Crisis of Global Capitalism
originally written May 1999, Bill Clinton set the stage for George W. to invade Afganistan and Iraq for humanitarian purposes.

And the comparison could be made that initially we were involved in peace keeping in the Balkans and then we were part of the War in the Balkans declared by that other Progressive For War, Bill Clinton.

At that time those who opposed imperialism and war, and the two go togther like peanutbutter and jam, also objected to that war. And that war was fought on so called humanitarian grounds, which many on the left even, mistakenly, supported. Christopher Hitchens opposed the war but now he supports the War in Iraq. Consistency is the hobgobllen of opportunists.

The Galloping Beaver says; If Canada were to suddenly withdraw because Canadians at home are getting squeamish, those who would have us do that should be aware that Canada would be forever viewed as an unreliable ally; not by the US, but by NATO. Canada relies on collective defence treaties to keep defence affordable. Withdrawl would result in no treaties, no collective defence and a huge price to pay in going it alone.

Exactly why we should withdraw from NATO. Something the NDP called for over many decades until Jack Layton decided to arbitrarily change the party platform. Thus leaving him in the Hobbesian dilemma he is in now over whether our Troops should stay or go. NATO is a cold war relic, whose purpose was to prepare for a European theatre of war with the USSR. Without the USSR, NATO has no purpose.That was until it was utilized to end the Balkan war it's member states had encouraged in the first place (with their recognition of Slovenia and Croatia).

Then the Beaver concludes; "No matter how comfortable people are inside our borders at the moment, they should realize that the world has become a much more dangerous place, particularly since the collapse of the Soviet Union."

Yep thats when the world changed. No longer did we fear the nuclear meltdown due to the Cold War. Nor could the Soviet Union do its job as an Imperialist power in moderating its client states and holding them accountable. Thus a vacuum was created. One into which marched the USA as it declared under the Elder Bush the coming of the New World Order. And the new mask of Imperialism was adopted, that of humanitarian wars.

Military interventions on supposedly humanitarian grounds have become an established feature of the post–Cold War global order. Since September 11, this form of militarism has taken on new and unpredictable proportions. Diana Johnstone’s well-documented study demonstrates that a crucial moment in establishing in the public mind—and above all, within the political context of liberalism and the left—the legitimacy of such interventions was the “humanitarian” bombing of the former Yugoslavia in 1999.

For those of us on the Left we are opposed to Capitalism, Imperialism and War we are not pacifists, we recgonize that all wars are the bosses war which is why we say No War But Class War.

This adventure in Afghanistan clearly exposes those who are the liberals and so called progressives, the new age social democrats who will go to war for humanitarian reasons; which is the new excuse for Capitalism and Imperialism. Like they once used nationalism and honor.



Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
war, imperialism, capitalism, Bush, Afghanistan, Canada, Military, Troops, NATO, Harper, Layton, DND

Contempt for Parliament

Opposition questions Harper's ethics Opposition MPs blasted Stephen Harper on Thursday for his refusal to co-operate with the federal ethics commissioner, with one MP threatening to hold the prime minister in contempt.

Only one?

The whole house should condemn Harper for being in contempt of Parliament.

Wait a minute wasn't that the reason we had an election?

The PM and the government had lost the moral right to govern? Yeah but that was after twelve years in power.

Harper has earned the contempt of parliament and the Canadian people after less than twelve weeks in power.

Harpers ethics? Simple. Run as a populist reformer. Once in power show your true colours as an autocrat.

“Government exists to serve Canadians; government must serve the public interest, not personal interests.”

Harper Makes Commitment to Clean Up Government 04 November 2005

Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
Canada, Government, Parliament, Harper, PM, PMO, ethics, accountability, Shapiro, Emerson

Cutting Your Nose To Spite Your Face

This headline says it all. Science vs. the Bush Administration. When it gets in the way of military projects for the weaponization of space say, or if it is controversial by pointing out patterns of global warming and climate change. Then out come the budget scissors and snip, snip. No more need to censor NASA when you can go for the jugular and put it on basic lifesupport.

Water discovery vs. NASA budget cuts The potential discovery of liquid water on a moon of Saturn is bittersweet for many scientists. The discovery, however, is bittersweet for many scientists. NASA's proposed budget for fiscal 2007 calls for a 50 percent cut in its astrobiology program. Although the program is a tiny piece of the agency's overall spending plan for science, it's a significant source of money for probing fundamental questions of how and why life emerged on Earth and whether life arose elsewhere in the universe. A 50-percent cut "is almost a going-out-of-business-level cut" in a vibrant line of research that stands as one pillar supporting President Bush's vision for space exploration, says planetary scientist Sean Solomon, who heads the Department of Terrestrial Magnetism at the Carnegie Institution of Washington More NASA articles.

Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
NASA, space, Saturn, water, moon, H2O, Budget, cuts, science, astronomy, astrophysics, Bush

Harper Plays Charest

Harper, Charest do historic lunch
King Stephen the Harpocrite made a historic second visit to Quebec yesterdfay. Where again nothing significant was done, it was all photo op and puff pastery.

But the optics well that's what counts. Did they discuss the health care accord? Non. Post Secondary Education funding? Non. Fiscal Imbalance. Non. It was all about the future. Charest's and Harpers.

They are after all kin, Charest led the Federal PC party before becoming a provincial Liberal. Harper led the Alliance before becoming a born again Conservative.

Harper and Charest need each other. Harper's best hope of growing a minority into a majority lies in Quebec and it can only become reality with the premier's help. Charest's chances of morphing a lacklustre first term into a second turn on winnowing out of Ottawa the latitude and money, in cash or tax points, to pursue Quebec interests in its own ways.

But with discussions on Federal balance of payments being suggested, this draws the Bloc on side as could be seen by BQ MP Richard Marceau's response on Mike Duffy yesterday. Daycare he said is a provincial issue.

Uh oh. Here it comes. The BQ will back the Tories. Daycare should be publicly funded the Bloc will argue, and would be if we didn't have an imbalance of payments from the Feds.

Harper will promise Quebec, not the ROC, to fix their imbalance and the BQ will be happy to vote with the Conservatives.

It's not like they haven't before.CBC News: Conservative, BQ MPs block meat packer fines

Charest's popularity has gone from rock bottom and is increasing after the federal election. A few scores of big bucks from the Feds and all will be forgiven. Its the perfect neo-con job.

Meanwhile the Quebec model of private public healthcare will become the model for the Conservatives revision of healthcare. Still feasible under the CHA, meets the Supreme court challenge and makes Ralph Kleins Third Way the boogie man.
And all will be well in the Harpocrites universe.

NDP Leader Jack Layton said Charest and Harper "seem to be working hand in glove to support the privatization of our health care," noting the topic didn't even come up. "There's some things going in this relationship between Mr. Charest and Mr. Harper that should concern Canadians," Layton said.

Yep, you tell em Jack.

Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
Charest, Harper, Quebec, Ottawa, Conservatives, Liberals, Government, Daycare, Fiscal, Imablance, UNESCO, BQ

Brison Affair Dejavu

Oh my gawd!

I just figured out why I kept getting this nagging feeling when I was blogging about Scott Brisons inappropirate email exchange on the Income Trust decision.

He and Martha Stewart both were in the investment business.

She contacted her broker and sold shares on insider information. She lied about it.

He contacted a broker friend and let him in on some inside information on Income Trusts. He lied about it.

She lied to the Feds, he lied to the Globe and Mail.

She knew better, he knew better.

She went to jail. He runs for the Liberal leadership to avoid jail.

She smiles he smiles.

Martha and Scott pees in the pod.

The reckless e-mails that Scott Brison sent

For a cabinet minister, there can be no such thing as idle speculation about future tax policy. Given his earlier investment career, Scott Brison had all the more reason to realize that it was highly indiscreet to predict happier times to a displeased investment banker on the eve of an anticipated tax change.

Mr. Brison compounded his sins this week by claiming that he could not recall his Nov. 22 e-mails about the fate of income trusts -- even though that banter, written when he was still public works minister, provoked a visit from the RCMP two months ago. Then, as more details of his imprudent messages emerged in The Globe and Mail, he protested his innocence. "At the time I was reluctant to discuss what I knew to be the subject of an RCMP investigation," he argued.

Loose lips on the Street came back to bite Brison

Mr. Brison denies he actually knew what was in store for trusts. Fair enough.

Intelligent people would take one look at that e-mail, and know what was coming. "Happier soon" could only mean a boost to the dividend tax credit, and no new levies on trusts. And that's exactly what the Liberals eventually unveiled.

This is the way the trust policy "leaked." The political types were giddy with good news. The Liberals had found a way to make everyone happy, and defuse an unexpected land mine. The impact such a policy might have on capital markets isn't exactly top of mind with politicians and their staff. They're focused on winning a country.

But news that the Street would be "happier soon" was transmitted loud and clear. When that information got into the hands of professional money managers, they knew exactly what to do. Hence the rally in dividend stocks and trusts in the hours before the Finance Minister finally cleared the air.

Find blog posts, photos, events and more off-site about:
Brison, Stewart, Income, Trust, Email, Canada, Liberals, Government, Investment, Goodale