Tuesday, March 05, 2024

‘Our fight will go on’: Why Germans are putting the brakes on Tesla


Elon Musk's plans to expand Tesla's European operations have run into opposition -



James Titcomb
Sun, 3 March 2024 

Elon Musk dad-danced on the production line as the first Model Y cars from Tesla’s Berlin “gigafactory” were delivered to customers in March 2022.

“This is a great day for the factory,” Musk said, showing off his moves to throngs of fans as he boasted that the launch was “another step in the direction of a sustainable future”.

Olaf Scholz, the German Chancellor, said it showed that the east of the country was at the “forefront of industry”.

The dancing may have been ill-advised.

A few days later, Musk was reportedly denied entry to Berghain, the techno mecca that is a fixture of Berlin’s clubbing scene – although the billionaire later said he had refused to go in.

It would not be Musk’s last cold shoulder in Germany.

Almost two years after its Berlin gigafactory opened its doors, Tesla is facing growing opposition in the country.

Protesters have camped out in the local woods bordering the manufacturing plant, erecting makeshift treehouses and field kitchens as they settle in for the long haul. On Saturday, supporters held a piano concert and handed out cake.

Residents in the municipality of Grünheide, where the factory is located, have voted against Tesla’s plan to expand the plant. Last week, a local utility claimed the operations were polluting supplies of drinking water.

“Tesla brought a lot of noise and air pollution in the region because of all the trucks that drive every day over the streets,” says Lou Winters from the group Tesla den Hahn abdrehen, which translates to “Turn off Tesla’s tap”.

“I talk to people who moved some years ago to Grünheide for the fresh air, for the calmness. Now almost nothing is left of this. For the first time in the history of the factory, the people of the region had the chance to say whether they wanted the expansion or not.”

Activists are camping out in Grünheide's woods to protest Tesla's planned expansion, a move that would entail the felling of forests 
- Cevin Dettlaff/dpa via AP

Musk, the world’s richest man and an ardent capitalist, is increasingly butting heads with Europe’s more collectivist tendencies.

As well as a row over his German plant, he has faced union rebellions in Scandinavia and a potential privacy investigation in the Netherlands, as well as looming tensions with Brussels over car imports.

It comes as EU governments are desperate for their domestic manufacturers to catch up with Tesla’s electric car leadership.

Two years ago, it seemed Musk’s force of will had broken through German bureaucracy.

Tesla’s boss announced in late 2019 that he planned to build Tesla’s third gigafactory – after plants in California and Shanghai – on the outskirts of Berlin.

It took just 861 days from that announcement for the first cars to roll off the line, supersonic by the standards of Germany’s planning and permissions regimes.

Matthias Schmidt, an independent European auto industry analyst, says Tesla managed to charm local politicians in Brandenburg, the former East German state that borders Berlin and is one of the country’s poorest regions.

“Tesla managed to dazzle and charm Brandenburg’s state government in their headlights,” he says. “It was flattered by the attention Musk was giving them and its state ministers weren’t going to let one of the world’s most progressive companies just drive on by. They weren’t prepared to let traditional German bureaucratic red tape slow them down.”

The benefits were mutual. Local officials could provide evidence they were reviving a region best known for coal mining and creating thousands of jobs in the process.

Meanwhile, Tesla could put a “Made in Germany” stamp on vehicles sold on the continent, as well as enjoy a steady supply of workers from Poland, whose border is less than an hour’s drive away.

The electric vehicle pioneer has long appealed to eco-conscious Europeans, where EVs make up almost one in five car sales, roughly double the proportion in the US. Last year, the Model Y was the best-selling car in Europe.

But locally, the company has never quite been accepted. “There was a huge clash of cultures,” says Schmidt. Conservationists have repeatedly protested and challenged the building of the plant, and protestors threw paint at Tesla’s Berlin store.

Opponents’ gripes include the factory’s working conditions and its effect on drinking water – the local authority said last week that the plant was pumping six times as much pollutants as permitted.

Protestors also cite more politically charged reasons, claiming electric cars are a poor substitute for public transport, while also objecting to lithium mining in poorer countries and capitalism itself.

But the opposition is not limited to a fringe of left-wingers. Last month, voters in Grünheide chose overwhelmingly to reject Tesla’s request to fell around 250 acres of forest and expand its plant by 50pc.

The advisory ballot saw 3,499 votes against the plans, compared to 1,822 in support.

Only 861 days elapsed between the announcement of the Brandenburg plant and its first cars being completed 
- REUTERS/Hannibal Hanschke

Though the referendum is not binding, local politicians said they would honour its results, forcing Tesla to go back to the drawing board. Opponents are promising to maintain pressure ahead of a council meeting later this month.

Tesla has other problems in Germany. IG Metall, Europe’s largest union, is seeking to boost membership at the company’s plant.

This month, the factory’s worker representation council will hold new elections.

Tesla has told local media in Germany that its plant has no impact on the water supply, while the company has said it will seek further talks with locals opposed to the factory expansion.

However, Christiane Benner, the head of the union, has warned Musk: “You need to be careful – the rules of the game are different here.”

The union, meanwhile, has alleged safety failures at the factory that have led to acid burns and injuries. The company has said it has adequate safety protocols at the site.

Musk, who has long resisted unionisation among Tesla staff in the US, has already had a taste of worker resistance in Sweden, where mechanics have gone on strike over the company’s refusal to engage in collective bargaining. Musk has dismissed the action as “insane”.

Tesla is facing a slew of other issues in Europe. Regulators in the Netherlands, where the company has its European headquarters, are investigating claims from a whistleblower that it broke data protection laws by making workers’ personal details available to all other staff at the company.

Musk’s own standing on the continent has also diminished after he questioned whether the US should keep supplying arms to Ukraine and was embroiled in an anti-Semitism controversy.

Twitter, which Musk has renamed X since buying it in 2022, is the subject of a formal EU investigation over potentially illegal content on the service.

Meanwhile, Brussels is investigating imports of cars from China, an inquiry aimed at Chinese competitors such as BYD. However, the consequences could also harm Tesla, which imports more cars from China to Europe than any other manufacturer.

That only makes it more pressing for Tesla to make more cars in Europe and reflects why delays to its German plans would be such a setback.

It is unsurprising, then, that Musk is assessing his options.

Last year, Emmanuel Macron welcomed the billionaire to the Élysée Palace, where Musk said he hoped to make a “significant investment” in France in the future.

Last week, Italy’s business minister told the country’s parliament that talks had been ongoing with Tesla for months.

The threat of investment elsewhere is likely to spur local politicians back in Grünheide to overcome local opposition.

That may not be easy. Winters, from the protest group, vows not to give up: “Whatever Elon Musk’s plans are, our fight will go on!”
PRIVATIZED WATER
H2O Asset Management suffers fresh auditing blow: How did it end up here?


Elliot Gulliver-Needham
Sun, 3 March 2024 

Between 2015 and January 2020, H2O AM invested €2.3bn in illiquid private debt securities linked to controversial German financier Lars Windhorst.


Beleaguered French investment firm H2O Asset Management has suffered a fresh blow after its auditors warned that the firm’s accounts “do not give a true and fair view” of its current financial position.

But how did it end up here?

Between 2015 and January 2020, H2O AM invested €2.3bn in illiquid private debt securities linked to controversial German financier Lars Windhorst.

Revelations of these investments triggered an investor flight in 2019, prompting French regulator Autorité des Marchés Financiers to order the firm to freeze three of its funds.

While it had named itself H2O to reference the liquidity of its assets, clients claimed the illiquid debt investments had been “in total contradiction with the management strategy proposed to investors”.

Following the intervention from the regulator, H2O AM suspended seven of its funds in 2020 and moved 20-30 per cent of its assets into ‘side pockets’, specially created funds to house the debt and eventually sell them.

H2O AM has begun to pay back its investors, who have been unable to access their money, but has still only paid out €250m of the €1.6bn owed.

The firm has provided occasional updates that have seen the value of the funds revised down over time, sometimes by as much as 70 per cent in a single year.

Last month, the company’s 2022 accounts revealed that auditor Mazars had issued an “adverse opinion”, adding that the group’s financial statements had not been prepared and presented “in accordance with Luxembourg legal and regulatory requirements”, according to the FT.

This was primarily due to H2O AM not consolidating the accounts of the parent company and its subsidiaries “according to the same accounting periods”, and that Mazars had been unable to “obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence” on the group’s remaining illiquid assets.

Mazars said: “In our opinion, because of the significance of the matter described in the ‘basis for our adverse opinion’ section, the accompanying consolidated financial statements do not give a true and fair view of the group’s consolidated financial position.”

In December, a lawsuit was launched against the firm by an investor group, claiming its over 6,000 members had lost €717m due to its investment in the illiquid assets.

Meanwhile, the French regulator hit the firm with a record fine last year, totalling €75m, while co-founder Bruno Crastes and chief investment officer Vincent Chailley were ordered to pay €15m and €3m respectively.

H2O AM and Mazars declined to comment to the FT on the auditing report.
UK
Sexism in the City: ‘No matter how hard I work, they will never ever recognise me’



Kalyeena Makortoff 
Banking correspondent
THE GUARDIAN
Sun, 3 March 2024 

More than 40 women from the financial services industry shared their stories with the Treasury committee’s Sexism in the City inquiry.
Photograph: Shomos Uddin/Getty Images

When City executive Selena* logged on for a Teams call with five senior male colleagues in spring 2021, she was gobsmacked.

She had spent weeks warning bosses that the London-based investment firm risked falling foul of European regulations. She had gathered data and presented supporting evidence, but was repeatedly brushed off. “Nobody wanted to listen,” she said.

So her jaw dropped that afternoon when a male colleague raised the issue and immediately gained support from the same boss who had ignored her. “I had to stop the meeting,” she recalls. “I said: ‘Why does it take a white, middle-aged man to deliver the exact same message that I’ve been delivering over the last few weeks?’”

When her comments were dismissed, and described as “over the top”, it was the final straw. “The realisation was: it doesn’t matter how hard I work, how talented, how committed I am. They will never ever recognise me,” she said.

Selena – now in her mid-40s – later resigned, bringing her decades-long career to a temporary halt, and leaving another City executive’s behaviour unchecked.

Her story was among those shared by more than 40 women from the financial services industry during a closed-door session of the House of Commons’ Treasury committee’s Sexism in the City inquiry, the report and recommendations of which are due to be released this week.

Prompted in part by the sexual harassment allegations against hedge fund boss Crispin Odey, the inquiry is meant to determine whether meaningful progress had been made since the committee’s last review in 2018. But the shocking stories recently shared with MPs for its investigation – which ranged from office bullying to allegations as serious as rape – suggest the post-#MeToo focus on diversity and inclusion has failed to eradicate widespread misogyny.

Instead, the “old boys’ club”, according to the committee’s interim report, has been pushed into the shadows. Sexual harassment may be less prevalent in the office, but is more often taking place at conferences and work trips, while bad behaviour has merely become “more underhand and pernicious”, the committee explained.

“We have been quite taken aback by just how little things have shifted in the last five years,” said Conservative MP and Treasury committee chair Harriett Baldwin, speaking before the report’s publication.

Related: Harriett Baldwin: the fund manager turned Tory MP fighting sexism in the City

There were hopes the dial might move thanks to a post-pandemic boom in flexible working, mandatory gender pay gap reporting, as well as the voluntary uptake of the women in finance charter – the companies who sign up must set targets for boosting diversity in their senior ranks.

Unfortunately, little had changed by the time 26-year-old Victoria* joined a large global bank through a graduate scheme in 2019. She felt prepared for a career in a male-dominated industry, having studied computer sciences and watched both her parents navigate roles in the City. “But I don’t know if I entirely expected it to be so alienating,” Victoria said.

She found herself regularly dodging bosses’ comments about whether male colleagues were her boyfriends and was criticised for being “chatty”. But she pushed on, and was hired as one of three women on a 60-strong quants team – which involves banks using complex mathematical models to price financial products.

Despite her enthusiasm, and requests to attend regular meetings to understand team goals, she felt repeatedly shut out. “I was told to just sit there and be quiet. It’s not something women want to be told.” Victoria’s role was later made redundant, and she has since moved out of the sector.

Experiences like Victoria’s have left MPs wondering whether a hyper-focus on boosting female leadership – while it is an important piece of the puzzle – has allowed firms to avoid tackling other harmful employment practices.

“A lot of the people that want to make it better think that just having more women will make it better,” the Labour MP and fellow committee member Angela Eagle said. “And they’re not looking at the power relationships, and how earnings and incentives work in particular bits of the sector … so I still think there’s been a misanalysis of what needs to be done.”

There are also concerns that smaller firms such as boutique investment and hedge funds have been able to avoid scrutiny, as they are exempt from pay gap reporting and proposals to force larger City firms to report diversity strategies and targets.

It puts those smaller firms at greater risk of harbouring the worst offenders, Baldwin said. “You’d have a harder time recommending to your daughter that she go and work for some of these firms, than you might for some of the big corporates,” said the MP, who herself was the target of inappropriate behaviour early in her career at JP Morgan.

Julie, a 40-year veteran of the insurance industry, said a ban on non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) and gagging orders, which protect the reputation of the worst-offending firms, could be one simple fix.

She spent the first few decades of her career navigating bouts of bullying, being sidelined after her maternity leave, and feeling forced to sign an NDA that left her unable to challenge one employer’s dismissal. But Julie did not expect further discrimination when she joined a new broker in 2018.

Her team leader was a younger man, but any hope that he would take a more progressive approach was quickly dashed. Requests to work from home met severe scrutiny, and she was pushed to make up time for attending hospital appointments. When she was diagnosed with a brain tumour, that boss sent helpline and hospice care leaflets to Julie’s husband. “He was just awful,” she said.

She then watched on as he was hired by another firm, and placed on its diversity committee. “There’s still a long way to go. Men get away with a lot.”

Any palpable change could hinge on whether Baldwin’s Treasury committee is willing to give the recommendations in its report – aimed at government and City regulators – some teeth.

The committee’s 2018 review, published under its former chair, Nicky Morgan, raised worthwhile concerns about the City’s pervasive “alpha male” culture, as well as how the structure of bonus payouts and a focus on presenteeism had deterred and disadvantaged women in finance. But more glaring, in hindsight, were its omissions.

There was no reference to the scandal that unfolded months earlier around the men-only Presidents Club dinner, where hired hostesses were allegedly groped and sexually harassed by the invited businessmen and bankers. None either of the impact of the #MeToo movement, which gathered pace in 2017 as women in all industries across the world began sharing personal stories of sexual harassment on social media.

Baldwin has promised that her report will feature “actionable recommendations”: “This is going to be very much a summary of some progress, but very much ‘work in progress’.”

But the committee’s ultimate goal, Eagle added, is that it will be the last report of its kind. “I hope that in five years, we won’t have to do this again,” she said.

*Not her real name
Dozens of ‘major’ compliance breaches at Bank of England, NAO reports

Kalyeena Makortoff 
THE GUARDIAN
Banking correspondent
Sun, 3 March 2024 

The Bank of England had ‘made good progress’, the NAO said, but there had been an unacceptable level of compliance breaches of its own staff policies. 
Photograph: Yui Mok/PA

Dozens of “major” compliance breaches have been unearthed at the Bank of England, despite progress to fix shortcomings after misuse of the central bank’s audio feed by hedge funds four years ago.

The report by the National Audit Office (NAO), the public spending watchdog, reviewed the Bank’s actions to improve the handling of non-financial risks, and whether it had learned lessons from two high-profile scandals.

That included the 2017 resignation of deputy governor Charlotte Hogg, who failed to declare that her brother worked for Barclays, and an embarrassing security breach in December 2019 that gave hedge funds early access to audio feeds of the Banks press conferences.

While the NAO said the central bank had “made good progress” it warned there had been an unacceptable level of compliance breaches of the Bank’s own staff policies over the 12 months to August 2023.

These included 28 major breaches, which can be as serious as failing to disclose a conflict of interest that can affect a senior official’s independence, and can result in disciplinary action.

They also involved 628 minor breaches, which can refer to an employee’s failure to get advanced approval for personal transactions including mortgages or investments, or emails being sent to the wrong address.

It marked a rise from the 584 minor – and 19 major – breaches in the previous year.

While most of the breaches were self-reported, the NAO said the figures were “above what the Bank considers an acceptable level”. A 2023 staff survey also found that only 59% of the central bank’s staff felt they were free to speak up without fear of negative consequences.

The NAO’s comptroller and auditor general, Gareth Davies, said it was clear “the Bank of England has made good progress in developing new and improved systems to understand and manage compliance risks.

“As it takes forward this work, the Bank should ensure it continues to improve the quality and consistency of its risk information, and awareness and confidence among staff to raise concerns.”

David Roberts, the chair of the Court of the Bank of England, said he welcomed the NAO report and that the central bank was “committed to promoting the highest standards of integrity and ethics and will carefully consider the NAO’s recommendations”.

Four in 10 at Bank of England are afraid to speak out on issues, new study shows

Tim Wallace
Sun, 3 March 2024 

bank of england building

Around four in 10 staff at the Bank of England do not feel free to speak their mind without fear of “negative consequences”, according to a survey of workers.

Hesitancy among employees on Threadneedle Street has emerged as officials seek to improve compliance at the Bank, as a survey shows that openness among workers is lower than other public sector bodies.

A Whitehall survey of civil servants found that more than three-quarters of staff felt they could talk openly, according to the National Audit Office (NAO), well above the Bank’s 59pc.

A review by the NAO said “good progress” has been made in raising this from 51pc in 2021, but added that “there is more work to be done”.

The NAO is reviewing the Bank’s compliance practices after a series of high-profile controversies.

In 2017, Charlotte Hogg, a deputy governor, resigned less than a fortnight into the role after failing to properly declare her brother’s role at Barclays.

Two years later, the Bank found that a technology supplier was offering hedge fund clients an ultra-fast audio stream of official press conferences, potentially giving traders an advantage as they received information quicker than other viewers.

Since then, the Bank has sought to improve the way it manages compliance risks, including by improving training, the NAO said.

The Bank has offered more “training and workshops on risk awareness and speaking up” to create “a culture of risk awareness among staff”.

Bosses have “aimed to take a proportionate response to breaches, to create a healthy and open culture where staff are more likely to report incidents or concerns”.

However, creating a consistent culture of compliance poses a challenge as 1,400 of the Bank’s staff – around one-quarter – have been there for less than two years, the NAO found.

It also discovered 628 minor compliance breaches in the 12 months to August 2023 – such as sending emails to the wrong address.

There were also 28 major breaches, a category which can include “senior level conflicts that materially affect an official’s independence but have not been disclosed”.

Meg Hillier, chairman of the Public Accounts Committee, said: “The Bank of England relies on public trust and its reputation for integrity to carry out its role. However, past incidents at the Bank and other public bodies have shown how failure to demonstrate integrity can harm an organisation’s credibility and reputation.”

David Roberts, chair of the Court of the Bank of England, added: “We welcome the National Audit Office’s report on the Bank’s management of legal, ethical and staff compliance risks. The Bank is committed to promoting the highest standards of integrity and ethics and will carefully consider the NAO’s recommendations.”
HIP CAPITALI$M
Hipgnosis sees value of portfolio cut after new due diligence work

Rupert Hargreaves
Mon, 4 March 2024 

The board appointed the third-party advisor following disagreements between the company and its investment advisor Hipgnosis Song Management Limited, over the value of its assets.

The Hipgnosis Songs Fund has today reported an updated net asset value following the preliminary valuation report prepared by Shot Tower Capital.

The investment trust’s stock price is down over 10 per cent on the news.

Shot Tower was appointed by the company as part of its strategic review of the value of its portfolio of music streaming rights.

The board appointed the third-party advisor following disagreements between the company and its investment advisor Hipgnosis Song Management Limited, over the value of its assets.

Shot Tower has performed a detailed review of the company’s portfolio, using a “variety of factors and assumptions,” about royalty streams, rights and cash revenue generated from the value of assets.

Following the detailed analysis, the advisor has returned a “preliminary valuation report,” which pegged the fair value of the company’s portfolio at between $1.8bn (£1.4bn) and $2.1bn (£1.7bn) and $1.7bn (£1.3bn) and $2bn (£1.6bn) after “deducting contingent catalogue bonuses of $59.9m (£47.3). “

The Shot Tower valuation compared to the 30 September 2023 valuation of $2.6bn (£2.1bn).

Hipgnosis said: “The Shot Tower valuation midpoint of $1.9bn (£1.5bn) therefore reflects a multiple of 15.9x net royalty income prior to deducting contingent catalogue bonuses and a reduction in valuation of 26.3% to the valuation as at 30 September 2023.”

Adjusted solely for the Shot Tower Valuation, the company’s operative net asset value would be approximately $1.17 (92p) per share, compared to the last reported net asset value of $1.7392 (137p) per share at the end of September.

Robert Naylor, Chairman of Hipgnosis Songs Fund, said: “The newly constituted board is making good progress with the due diligence work that will underpin its strategic review. We are disclosing the valuation at this time given its material difference to valuations previously disclosed. The board will provide further detail on this when the due diligence is complete. The board remains focused on identifying all options to deliver shareholder value.”
GREEN CAPITALI$M
Green AI Carbon platform AIMs for London listing amid lack of confidence in market

Rhodri Morgan
Mon, 4 March 2024 

Carbon Done Right, formerly Klimat X, self-described as 'the world's first smallholder farmer carbon credit reforestation company, is seeking a dual listing of its shares on London's AIM market.

A tree-planting, carbon offsetting firm is eyeing up a London listing in hopes of turning around the bad smell surrounding carbon investments.

Carbon Done Right, formerly Klimat X, self-described as ‘the world’s first smallholder farmer carbon credit reforestation company, is seeking a dual listing of its shares on London’s AIM market.

The firm says its aim is to unlock the full potential of existing smallholder rainforest planting projects by leveraging proprietary technology to create high-value, best-in-class carbon credits that offer positive ecological and social outcomes.

Through the use of artificial intelligence and blockchain, the company monitors the health of trees it plants and tracks carbon sequestration data for farmers and customers.

Currently, Carbon Done Right‘s existing project footprint is across the forests of Sierra Leone and it intends to expand operations beyond the existing 57,000 hectares to at least 100,000 hectares.

The same model will then transfer to other countries across Africa, starting in Ghana and Liberia.

The firm said it recognises that confidence in the voluntary carbon markets has been “eroded due to the poor practices of others”, including low transparency levels and poor deals for governments of developing countries.

But if the approval process, set to conclude by early Q2, goes smoothly, the company believes a listing will open it up to a new pool of investors and future growth funding options.

Commenting on the news, James Tansey, chief executive, said: “We are committed to providing quality, transparent credits and simplifying the offset buying process and the incorporation of proprietary technology will see us become a vertically integrated business active in nature-based projects.

“This reflects our mission to provide our buyers extraordinary levels of trust and traceability along all aspects of the carbon offset supply chain and live by our name Carbon Done Right.”
CHINA GETS AROUND SANCTIONS
China's JCET to buy stake in flash memory facility from Western Digital

Reuters
Updated Mon, March 4, 2024 

The new SanDisk A1 microSD card is displayed at the SanDisk stand at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona


BEIJING (Reuters) -Chinese chip assembly and testing firm JCET Group said on Monday it plans to buy an 80% stake in a Shanghai flash memory facility owned by Western Digital Corporation for about $624 million in cash.

SanDisk Semiconductor Shanghai makes products such as iNAND flash memory modules as well as SD and MicroSD components used in areas such as telecommunications, automobiles and consumer devices, JCET said in a filing.

Western Digital said last year it would spin off its flash memory business that had been grappling with a supply glut, after talks of merging the unit with Japan's Kioxia stalled.

The deal, pending Chinese regulatory approvals, will expand JCET's market share in the data storage industry, JCET said in its filing to the Shenzhen Stock Exchange.

Buying the stake will allow JCET to enhance its partnership with Western Digital, which has been a long-term client and is expected to continue to place orders at SanDisk Semiconductor Shanghai after the transaction, JCET said.

(Reporting by Roxanne Liu, Ella Cao and Kane Wu; editing by Ed Osmond, Jason Neely and Louise Heavens)

China's Huawei and Amazon in patent licencing agreement


Reuters
Mon, March 4, 2024 

A Huawei logo is seen at the Mobile World Congress (MWC) in Shanghai


SHENZHEN, China (Reuters) - China's Huawei Technologies and U.S. tech giant Amazon said they had signed a multi-year patent licencing deal that resolves litigation between them.

Most terms of the deal were not disclosed, but Alan Fan, head of Huawei's intellectual property rights department, said the Chinese firm had ended lawsuits brought against Amazon in Germany over patented technology related to wifi and video playback.

The United States has barred Chinese telecom companies from its market citing concerns about data, and designated Huawei and ZTE as threats, requiring U.S. carriers to remove their equipment from U.S. networks.

It has also prevented U.S. firms from supplying Huawei with chips and other components, crippling its smartphone business.

Despite those tensions, the patent licence deal shows "American and Chinese companies and companies from other regions are cooperating without limitations in standards and patent licensing," Fan said.

Huawei also announced it had signed a cross-licencing patent deal with domestic smartphone maker Vivo covering communication technologies including 5G. Huawei has similar patent agreements with Chinese smartphone manufacturers Xiaomi and Oppo.

(Reporting by David Kirton; Editing by Edwina Gibbs)
CLIMATE CRIMINALS
Exclusive-Indian firms look to bet big on coal-fired power after long absence

Tue, March 5, 2024

A worker shovels coal in a supply truck at a yard on the outskirts of Ahmedabad

By Sudarshan Varadhan, Sarita Chaganti Singh and Sethuraman N R

SINGAPORE/NEW DELHI (Reuters) - Private Indian firms have expressed interest in building at least 10 gigawatts (GW) of coal-fired power capacity over a decade, four sources familiar with the matter said, ending a six-year drought in significant private involvement in the sector.

Adani Power, JSW Group and Essar Power are among the companies that have told India's power ministry they would be keen to expand old plants or develop stalled projects facing financial stress, according to the sources and a government presentation seen by Reuters.

The potential investments, which have not been previously reported, could cumulatively cost billions of dollars and demonstrate renewed appetite in an industry seen by many as financially unattractive. But they also threaten to undermine progress made by the world's No.3 greenhouse gas emitter in weaning its economy off carbon.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government, which has cited energy security concerns and low per-capita emissions to defend India's coal dependence, has been trying to attract private investment to boost its coal-fired capacity by 80 GW by 2032.

Coal-fired power plants currently account for half, or about 215 GW of India's total installed capacity of 430 GW, with renewables accounting for 135 GW and hydro making up 47 GW.

A spokesperson for the power ministry said the private sector had agreed to invest in the coal-fired power sector "in line with the energy requirements of the nation," adding that India was ahead of international commitments to cut emissions.

"The private sector is now expressing interest because of financial viability and assurance that payments will be made on time," he said.

The companies did not respond to requests seeking comment.

India's Association of Power Producers (APP), which represents coal-fired power developers, told Power Minister R K Singh its members were eager to boost capacity, according to a Dec 4 letter reviewed by Reuters.

Among the new proposals, Adani Power plans to add 4.8 GW and JSW 1 GW, according to three sources and a government presentation dated Nov 21 reviewed by Reuters.

Essar Power plans 1.6 GW of new domestic coal-based power generation in Gujarat state by 2029, one of the sources said. Another source said Vedanta will add 1.9 GW of capacity.

The sources - two government officials and two industry executives - declined to be named as the discussions are not public.

The presentation, made by an arm of the power ministry in November, estimates that the plants would be commissioned by 2032.

PRIVATE FUNDING DROUGHT

In the five years to March 2018, private sector investments drove 56 GW, or over 60% of new coal-fired power, government data shows. That dwindled to 1.5 GW, or 5% of additions, in the next five years as projects faced financial stress, shifting the investment burden onto state and federal governments.

A total of 24 private sector projects totalling over 23 GW, or over 10% of current Indian coal-fired capacity, are on hold or unlikely to be commissioned due to financial stress, according to power ministry data.

However, higher coal dependence in the last three years due to slower renewable installations, heavy power demand, and new emergency laws enabling higher tariffs have made coal-fired power attractive again, boosting profits and pushing shares of generators to record highs.

APP asked the government to provide more flexibility in coal and power supply agreements and expansion of existing power plants, ease clearances, and ensure domestic credit availability to expedite investments.

"It will be a big challenge for any private developer to raise funds," APP wrote in the Dec 4 letter, adding that state lenders Power Finance Corp (PFC) and Rural Electrification Corp (REC) should be asked to take the lead.

PFC and REC did not immediately respond to emails seeking comment.

A senior REC executive said it was keen to fund the planned additions with 70% debt as long as lending requirements are met.

"REC has made significant progress in reducing non-performing assets and we would like to keep it that way," the executive told Reuters, speaking on condition of anonymity as the matter was not public.

(Reporting by Sudarshan Varadhan in Singapore, Sarita Chaganti Singh in New Delhi and N R Sethuraman in Bengaluru; Editing by Tony Munroe and Raju Gopalakrishnan)
Closing gender gap could lift global GDP more than 20%, World Bank says



Mon, March 4, 2024
By Andrea Shalal

WASHINGTON, March 4 (Reuters) - Ending discriminatory laws and practices that prevent women from working or starting businesses could raise global gross domestic product by more than 20%, which would double the rate of global growth over the next decade, the World Bank said on Monday.

The bank's 10th annual Women, Business and the Law report showed women on average have just 64% of the legal protections that men do, not the 77% previously estimated, and no country - not even the wealthiest - provides true equal opportunity.

The lower number reflects major deficiencies revealed by the inclusion of two new indicators - safety and childcare - in addition to pay, marriage, parenthood, workplace, mobility, assets, entrepreneurship and pensions.

The report assessed for the first time how 190 countries are implementing existing laws to protect women, finding what it called a "shocking" gap between policy and practice.

"Women have the power to turbocharge the sputtering global economy," said World Bank chief economist Indermit Gill, noting that reforms to prevent discrimination have slowed to a crawl.

The report said obstacles that women face in entering the global workforce included barriers to starting businesses, persistent pay gaps and bans on working at night or in jobs deemed "dangerous".

Women have barely a third of needed legal protections against domestic violence, sexual harassment, child marriage and femicide in the 190 countries studied, the report found.

Sexual harassment is banned in the workplace in 151 countries, but only 40 have laws banning it in public places. "How can we expect women to prosper at work when it is dangerous for them just to travel to work," Gill said.

Women also spend an average of 2.4 more hours a day on unpaid care work than men, much of it caring for children, with only 78 countries having enacted quality standards governing childcare services.

On paper, women had roughly two-thirds the rights of men, but countries lacked the systems needed for full implementation and enforcement, the report also found.

For example, 98 economies have equal pay laws, but only 35 have pay-transparency measures or enforcement mechanisms to address the pay gap, which shows women earning just 77 cents for every dollar earned by men.

The report includes specific recommendations for governments, including improving laws relating to safety, childcare and business opportunities; enacting reforms that lift restrictions on women's work; expanding maternity and paternity leave provisions; and setting binding quotas for women on corporate boards of publicly traded companies.

Earlier retirement ages for women, despite women living longer than men, also limit their income.

"Because they receive lower pay while they work, take time off when they have children, and retire earlier, they end up with smaller pension benefits and greater financial insecurity in old age," it said.

Tea Trumbic, the report's lead author, said barely half of women participated in the global workforce, compared with nearly three out of every four men.

"This is not just unfair - it’s wasteful. Countries simply cannot afford to sideline half of their population.” (Reporting by Andrea Shalal; Editing by Edwina Gibbs)














Threatened in their homeland, feral Mexican parrots thrive on L.A.'s exotic landscaping

Louis Sahagún
Sun, March 3, 2024 

A ROUGH CREW

Seasonal parrots gather in a roost in Temple City in January 2023.
 (Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times)


During a walk through the Huntington Botanical Gardens with her mother one morning, Brenda Ramirez was alarmed by the sudden squawks, warbles, and screeches of troops of parrots flying overhead at great speed in tight, precise formations.

“I asked my mom what they were,” Ramirez recalled of that day 14 years ago. “She said, ‘Mija, they are just like the parrots from Mexico we’ve seen in zoos, except for one thing: They are free flying and breed in the trees along our city streets.”

Ramirez was entranced by this fleeting glimpse of adaptation by tropical species in one of the world’s greatest asphalt jungles.

Now, at 27, she leads a team of investigators at the Free Flying Los Angeles Parrot Project based in Occidental College’s Moore Laboratory of Zoology, which aims to resolve a biological puzzle: How did red-crowned and lilac-crowned parrots establish local urban breeding populations via the pet trade from Mexico, where both species are on the brink of extinction?


Brenda Ramirez, right, and John McCormack look for parrots along the road in Temple City. (Dania Maxwell / Los Angeles Times)

A potential answer is that Southern California cities have only in the last 100 years provided these sister species with a resource untapped by native birds: the fruits and flowers of exotic trees used for landscaping, according to the team’s new report in the journal Diversity and Distributions.

Their findings add to a growing body of evidence that some introduced species including these feral parrots can experience rapid niche shifts beyond what appears to be possible in the forested regions of northern Mexico they evolved in.

For example, the driest month in Southern California is significantly drier than any portion of their native habitats in the western and eastern coastal regions of Mexico, the study says. The timing of the precipitation here is also different, with a winter rainfall regime rather than summer rains.

Read more: Are L.A.’s parrots getting louder? We investigate

“Artificial irrigation may close the gap between native and introduced climates,” the study suggests, “allowing more year-round vegetation in Southern California cities than expected given its natural precipitation levels.”

That “urban oasis effect” created by sprinkler watering systems “could partly explain why introduced parrots do not seem to be spreading beyond urban centers,” it says. “Their intelligence and behavioral plasticity might further allow them to adapt to urban life.”


Seasonal parrots gather in a roost in Temple City in January 2023. 
(Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times)

The look of Southern California’s green canopies has changed significantly since the 1950s and ’60s, when developers turned up their noses at native oaks and sycamores. They chose instead to landscape their subdivisions, apartment complexes, business parks, shopping centers and roadways with nonnative trees, including sweet gums, camphor, carrotwood, fig, and ficus trees — all favored by parrots.

For reasons that are not fully understood, several hundred parrots seek evening accommodations each night in the limbs of fig and London plane trees lining a bustling stretch of Rosemead Boulevard in Temple City. The odd locale is believed to be one of the most populous roosting sites for parrots in the Los Angeles area.

Read more: He wants L.A. to love macaws as much as it loves dogs. Will free flying do the trick?

“It’s just cultural memory: They spend all day feeding on the seeds, berries, and flowers of the surrounding tropical treescape,” said John McCormack, director and curator of the Moore Lab of Zoology, during a recent visit to the boulevard. “At sundown, they come together here to rest and sleep.”

The parrots are beloved overnighters here, and residents are on constant alert for poachers. A video of nets in the trees and an unidentified man slamming captured parrots against a concrete wall between Rosemead Boulevard and East Las Tunas Drive on Oct. 26 fueled angry calls and letters to the local Los Angeles County sheriff’s station, City Hall and other government agencies.

Birders photograph parrots in Temple City during an Audubon Society gathering in January 2023. (Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times)

It remains unclear whether the man shown in the video was killing some of the parrots he trapped and taking others with him to sell on the illegal wildlife market.

Those birds and other introduced species of parrots and parakeets that have found niches in the clatter and commotion of Southern California city life are believed to be descendants of released pets, especially during the 1970s and ’80s, when the illegal importation of such wild birds reached its peak, according to the study.

Read more: This dirt parking lot in the San Gabriel Mountains is a magnet for migrating birds

Red-crowned parrots, whose home range is restricted to the lowlands of northeast Mexico, were first recorded in the Los Angeles area in 1963. Since then, the population has swelled to more than 3,000 birds, the study says.

The number of lilac-crowned parrots, which are endemic to tropical lowlands in west Mexico and became established locally in the 1980s, is about 800 birds.

Given that both species are considered endangered in their home ranges in Mexico due to habitat loss and trapping for the pet trade, local established flocks have become prized for their conservation potential.


Parrot specimens are seen inside the Moore Lab of Zoology at Occidental College in Los Angeles. According to a new scientific study, two species of parrots have established breeding populations in Southern California following their introduction via the pet trade from their home range in Mexico. 
(Dania Maxwell / Los Angeles Times)More

The two species are so similar in size and color that even experts have a tough time telling them apart. Both are crow-sized, chunky birds that establish lifelong pair bonds that usually produce one brood per breeding season.

However, both species have been seen together in the same flocks, underlining the importance of monitoring the birds for signs of hybridization that could undermine proposals to reintroduce urban parrots from Southern California to their native habitats in Mexico.

In the meantime, the Moore Lab Project aspires to become a hub for urban parrot ecology.

For her mother’s birthday on Nov. 12, Ramirez took her to Rosemead Boulevard to witness the unusual sundown spectacle of squawking parrots plunging into the trees.

“As the sun was setting, we could hear them flying in from all directions,” she recalled. “I turned to my mother and said, 'This is as good as it gets.'”



This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.