Wednesday, November 06, 2024


On Divesting–and Voting–in “The End Times”



 November 6, 2024
Facebook

Image by Unsplash+.

I don’t know about you, but it seems to me like these days all the right and the left can agree on is that we’re living in The End Times. We’ve got a world of right-wing mega churches and home school militias just jonesing to belly up to the bar for another shot at transforming the U.S. into a theocratic, transphobic, patriarchal hellhole presided over by none other than the pussy-grabbing, Bible-hawking, daughter-ogling, wannabe King LeerA guy who demonstrates less moral awareness than your average Peeping Tom, and who, if elected, will have far greater capacity for organized sexual violence. (Who imagines Trump wouldn’t love to preside over his own personal Abu Ghraib?) We’re talking a guy who might as well be wearing a T-shirt with an arrow pointing upwards that reads “I’m with Beelza Bubba.” A guy who spews so much bile, It seems like only a matter of time before his head starts spinning like Regan’s in The Exorcist.

And then there’s the odd AK-wielding, trash-talking Christian Gun Moll Moms in Congress, who, judging from their Christmas cards, run a substantially higher legal risk than the average American of being charged as accessories when one of their little darlings decides to cosplay the Columbine shooting. One can only surmise their plan is to flash their cash at the pearly gates, and if St. Peter still won’t cave, just Rambo his ass.

Given the state of the planet, perhaps it’s no wonder that so many Christians are desperate to get raptured up. And let’s acknowledge that for all their current embrace of Netanyahu, far right Christians view a Jewish convergence in “the Holy Land” as the requisite celestial semaphore needed to summon their muscular Bad-Daddy-Trump-Jesus. As the Bible must surely saith somewhere, once enough Jewish people are assembled, the Christian right’s Personal Savior and Candyman can be counted on to use his intergalactic light saber and transporter to whisk them all off to their all-white, all-gentile-all-the-time country club in the sky, and simultaneously banish Jews, Muslims, Jains, Buddhists, Rastafarians, et al, along with various Christian heretics and riff-raff, to be tortured for all eternity.

Speaking of hot places, we really are in quite a deep planetary pickle, having rapidly ripped through the 1.5 degree Celsius limit recommended in the toothless Paris Climate Agreement. The world, as UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres recently warned, is “teetering on a planetary tightrope.  Either leaders bridge the emissions gap, or we plunge headlong into climate disaster — with the poorest and most vulnerable suffering the most.”

Millions of young people are being born into a world that’s starting to hemorrhage methane, a world where tornados and “once in a century” hurricanes, typhoons, and historic floods are becoming routine occurrences. A world in which their personal data is routinely surveilled, marketed, and monetized before they graduate high school. A world in which social media has enabled millions of them to watch the bone-crunching child- annihilating genocide unfold in real time in Gaza, brought to you by U.S.& Israeli Bombs & Surveillance R Us.

In the past year alone, according to Brown University’s Cost of War Project, “U.S. spending on Israel’s military operations and related U.S operations in the region total at least $22.76 billion and counting.“ Since 1959, “[a]djusted for inflation, total U.S. military aid to Israel stands at $251.2 billion….” And so, many young Americans are starting to ask how else that money might be spent in their own communities, what it might buy in the way of universal healthcare, Head Start programs, and tuition-free college education. The good news is The National Priorities Project enables people to see just how that kind of “trade-off” might work. Check it out, kids, and see what you’ve been missing!

In contrast to the U.S., Israel has had universal healthcare since 1995. And, according to a website recruiting new settlers, in Israel, “tuition costs are regulated by the government at around $3,000 per year,” and, as the site goes on to explain, the cost of university in the U.S. is “nowhere near the low price of college in Israel.” But particularly since the start of the “War on Terror,” more and more money in the U.S. has been siphoned off from domestic spending and redirected to subsidize the world’s largest carbon-sucking, global death-delivery vehicle.

One of the few hopeful developments in the midst of the unspeakable violence being committed in our names and with our tax dollars is that more and more university students and professors, at substantial risk to themselves, are taking a magnifying glass to their own university investment portfolios and demanding that they divest from death-dealing corporations in both the U.S. and Israel. How can we remain silent while tax dollars that could fund universal healthcare and free higher education in the U.S. have instead been used to kill or maim thousands of students, teachers, and professors in Gaza and to raze schools, universities, libraries, and archives? All twelve universities in Gaza were bombed within the first 100 days of the war alone. According to The Lancet, as of June, the death toll in Gaza was already approaching 40,000, not including the more than 10,000 believed to have been buried under U.S. and Israeli-made rubble.

It only makes sense both morally and strategically for activists pressing for universities to divest from fossil fuels to also throw their support behind campaigns for divestment from U.S. and Israeli companies that are profiting from the genocide in Gaza. Divestment organizing needs to take up concerns with not only the domestic costs of U.S. militarism, but also its carbon impacts. A January 2024 study in Social Science Research Network (SSRN) conservatively estimates the carbon “emissions from the first 60 days of the Israel-Gaza war [as] greater than the annual emissions of 20 individual countries and territories.” So, the same bombs that are laying waste to Gaza are blowing huge holes through our collective planetary carbon budget.

The carbon-intensive militarized gauntlet that has laid siege to Gaza has also reduced water access in Gaza to a mere trickle.­ UNICEF estimated that in December 2023, “displaced children in the southern Gaza Strip” had access to between half and two-thirds of what’s needed “[f]or survival alone…” let alone to feed children’s growing bodies. And the carbon impacts of all those bombs and all that military infrastructure are contributing to water shortages that are hitting far closer to home. The U.N. Environment Programme notes that “Two of the largest reservoirs in America, which provide water and electricity to millions, are in danger of reaching ‘dead pool status,’ a result of the climate crisis and overconsumption of water.”

As I’ve written elsewhere in Counterpunch, “Who can blame anyone whose families have been burned or buried alive by 2,000 -pound bombs, if they cannot bring themselves to vote for Harris?” But as morally bankrupt as the Democrats have, in the main, shown themselves to be with respect to Gaza, a Trump presidency-cum-monarchy promises to rapidly foreclose any semblance of democratic norms and pathways to change course on Gaza and the climate.

Universities today are critical sites of social struggle for both Gaza and the planet with endowments that collectively approach a trillion dollars. They are also high on Herr Trump’s encompassing hit list of “enemies from within.” Is anyone surprised that Trump, Roy Cohn’s eager acolyte, is eager to fan the flames of a McCarthyite witch hunt in higher education? As Henry Giroux recently noted in Counterpunch, J.D. Vance “has publicly branded  professors as ‘the enemy’ while Trump has pledged to cleanse universities of so-called ‘leftists,’ whom he denigrates as ‘vermin.’ “As Giroux also notes, for Trump, “labels like ‘leftists’ and ‘Marxists’ serve as sweeping condemnations for anyone who dares engage in critical thinking or challenges the status quo.” And why wouldn’t Trump jump at the chance to carve out, privatize and sell off these public assets at fire-sale prices to corporations for his own personal profit?

Domestically, fossil fuel companies that routinely push for draconian penalties for civil disobedience are likely to find a more than eager ally in Trump. Herr Trump’s bloodlust for violence against just about anyone he disagrees with–and certainly against protesters–is well-documented. As reported in a 2021 book by Wall Street Journal reporter Mike Bender, General Mark Milley put the kibosh on Trump’s orders to “’crack skulls,’” “’beat the fuck out of’” and “’just shoot’” protesters involved in the George Floyd racial justice uprising. But Project 2025 is an indication that the second time around Trump will be far better prepareagainst such constitutional restraints. Protesters going up against Trump-appointed judges stand a far better chance of incurring draconian sentences.  And prospects for appeals or reprieves may recede into the distant future if Trump keeps his promise to Christian theocrats and other allies that they “won’t have to vote again.”

Far too little has been said, moreover, about the links between the unfolding genocide in Gaza and oil and gas just off the coast in the Levant Basin. Trump’s complete disregard for the Emoluments clause in the Constitution, and the carte blanche he’s been given by his pussy-grabbing cronies on the Supreme Court, give him every incentive to want to profit from the unfolding genocide and “ethnic cleansing” of Gaza. And, as Patrick Wintour reported in The Guardian, at a 2024 talk at Harvard University, Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner “praised the ‘very valuable’ potential of Gaza’s ‘waterfront property’ and suggested Israel should remove civilians while it ‘cleans up’ the strip.”

The Biden administration’s actions on climate have definitely fallen short of his rhetoric and far shorter still of what’s needed to pull us back from the edge into a habitable world. But his policies have also been a far cry from those of the climate-denying Trump, with his mantra of “Drill, Baby, Drill,” and his open, unabashed invitation  to fossil fuel CEOS–during a lavish dinner at Mar-a-lago–to eviscerate climate regulations in exchange for $1 billion dollars in support for his reelection.

The $391 billion Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) that Biden signed within two years of taking office is definitely, at best, a mixed bag. It opens up public lands to drilling and offers subsidizes to companies peddling nuclear power as “green.” But Earthjustice also credits the bill with “supercharg[ing the] process of replacing our deadly fossil fuel economy with clean energy while investing in critical air monitoring technologies, pollution reduction programs, environmental justice priorities, and efficient permitting processes.”

But let’s be clear that whatever legislative inroads were made under Biden were not the product of his largesse, but rather were hard-won by a diversity of tactics: from local legislative and electoral victories to sustained environmental lobbying, lawsuits and other legal challenges, to people putting their bodies on the line in direct actions in an exhausting game of fossil fuel whack-a-mole. Still, if you want to get a sense of the key differences that all those oil executives chowing down at Mar-a-Lago likely see between Trump and Biden’s would-be successor Kamala Harris, check out The American Petroleum Institute’s list of grievances against the Biden administration. Personally, having had the sphincter-bracing experience in Portland in 2015 (alongside dozens of far braver kayaktivists) of trying to stop Shell’s Fennica icebreaker on its way up to the Arctic, I have a hard time being dismissive of Biden’s decision–on his first day in office–to cancel drilling leases in the Arctic.

A May “Open letter by Gaza academics and universities administrators to the world” calls for domestic and global support to defend and preserve our universities for the sake of the future of our people, and our ability to remain on our Palestinian land in Gaza.” The letter also asserts Palestinian resilience in the face of unspeakable horrors made possible by U.S. tax dollars: “We built these universities from tents. And from tents, with the support of our friends, we will rebuild them once again.” In the U.S., our integrity as educators and as humans mandates that we redouble our efforts to stop the genocide and redirect funds from the U.S. and Israeli war economies to rebuilding Gaza.

And alongside rebuilding Gaza’s schools and universities, let’s commit to reinvesting in and revitalizing schools and universities in the U.S. As Giroux has argued, “Today, the role of educators as public intellectuals aligned with broader social movements has never been more vital, especially when far-right extremists around the globe seek to turn education into a force for indoctrination.” Whatever the results of this election, it’s provided vivid and chilling examples of the lethal cost of ignorance in the U.S.

And finally, even if it sometimes looks like we’ve definitively answered the question of whether the world will end in ice or fire, let’s not short-change the apocalyptic possibilities of a nuclear winter. Seriously, isn’t there a biblical adage like, “Knoweth ye not that if thou canst not trust a man with his own daughter, thou definitely canst not trust him with the nuclear codes”?

Desiree Hellegers is affiliated faculty with the Collective for Social and Environmental Justice at Washington State University  Vancouver; director of The Thin Green Line is People History Project and a member/producer with the Old Mole Variety Hour  on Portland’s KBOO Radio. Their web series “How I Learned to Breathe Thru the Apocalypse” is airing on Portland’s Open Signal Cable TV .  More information on their work can be found at https://labs.wsu.edu/desiree-hellegers/

WELCOME TO TRUMPISTAN

Chronicle of a Defeat Foretold



 November 6, 2024

+ What does history repeat itself as after it does farce?

+ Kamala Harris proved too cowardly even to address her supporters Tuesday night, as her loss to Trump became more and more inevitable. But what could she really say? She couldn’t honestly say she’d run a vigorous campaign that championed the poor, the downtrodden, and the voiceless or that she’d fought for peace, and human dignity, and to fix an unraveling climate. I’d be really interested to hear her say what she thought her campaign was all about, but even Harris probably couldn’t have pinpointed the purpose or the meaning of her doomed run…

+ From the outside, Harris’s entire campaign seemed to be about saving an economic system (neoliberalism) that she described falsely as “democracy,” which isn’t working for large segments of both the political left and right; at the same time she and Biden were flouting an international system of laws in order to arm and finance a genocide in Gaza. The hypocrisies were too transparent to sustain.

+ This was a fatal moment in the friendly confines of the Stephen Colbert Show around the time that her post-convention/debate bounce began to deflate and she never got any better…

Stephen Colbert: “Under a Harris administration, what would the major changes be and what would stay the same?”

Harris: “Sure. Well, I mean, I’m obviously not Joe Biden. So that would be one change. But also I think it’s important to say with 28 days to go, I’m not Donald Trump.”

+ Like Hubert Humphrey, Harris was saddled with an unpopular war (a war & a genocide in her case) that her own boss was waging. Humphrey tried to break from LBJ on Vietnam but too late. Harris never did.

+ Harris’s stubborn refusal to separate herself from Biden to any degree went so far as to turn her campaign over to his campaign staff, the same brilliant strategic minds that had him trailing Trump by 10 to 15 points in July…

+ Harris had very different policies when she ran against him in 2016, maybe she should’ve stuck with a few of them, instead of saying stuff like her beliefs haven’t changed but her position on fracking/national health care/the border/ have….

+ In what was obviously going to be a “change” election, when Harris had the chance to differentiate herself from Biden, she said there wasn’t a “thing she could think of” she’d do differently…

+ Harris’s flip-flop on fracking is emblematic of her entire campaign, a relatively minor issue that gave devastating insight into her vacuous political character. She could never explain it because the only explanation was pure political calculation (and a bad one). She was willing to invalidate her climate policy to court a few thousand votes in Pennsylvania. It was the equivalent of Hillary telling Goldman Sachs she had one policy in public and another in private. But even more inept. How could you make the campaign about honesty & trust, once you’d shown yourself to be dishonest and untrustworthy on an issue you’d described as being an existential threat to human life on earth?

+ Harris sold out the climate movement (and the climate) and still lost Pennsylvania…

+ Harris losing Pennsylvania almost ensures that the Democrats will turn to Josh Shapiro as their champion in 2028 and won’t reverse course on their blind support of Israel.

+ Maybe in Harris’s case she’d’ve had a better shot at winning Wisconsin if she skipped it like Hillary. It could be the more they saw of her, the less there was to see…

+ Exit Poll in Wisconsin: Trump doubled his support among Black voters. He now has about 20% of the Black vote, compared to 78% for Harris. Four years ago, Trump won only about 8% of Black voters in the Badger State.

+ John Kerry lost in part because his “Ready to Serve” campaign emphasized his military career as the war in Iraq unraveled. Harris played up her role as a hard-ass prosecutor at a time of record police shootings–no wonder her support with Black and Hispanic men collapsed.

+ As I wrote in my column two weeks ago, Harris’ strategy to use Liz Cheney as a surrogate to win the mythical Haley voters when Haley herself was out campaigning for Trump was doomed to fail. And fail it did, spectacularly. Recall that when Cheney left office, he was one of the most universally reviled figures in American history, with an approval rating of 13%.

+ The Harris campaign’s messaging was so bad that they lost to Trump on the issue she hit the hardest, his MAGA movement being a threat to democratic values…

+ The Cheney gambit didn’t help her with independents. In Pennsylvania, independents went 50-44 for Donald Trump.

+ If any good comes out of this disaster, it would be driving the final nails in the coffins of the Clintons, Bidens, Bushes, Obamas, and Cheneys… It won’t. They’ll all be back in one manifestation or another. The one thing we can count on is that no lessons will be learned from this debacle. The Democrats lost to Trump the same way they did in 2016, only worse.

+ Ryan Grim: “The Cheneys have now stolen two elections from Democrats, but you can’t really blame them for the second.”

+ Sending NAFTA Bill Clinton to scold Arab-American voters in Michigan (of all places!) and Obama to harangue black men in Pennsylvania during the last week of the campaign seems to have gone over well…

+ The Harris campaign refused to allow one anti-genocide speaker at their convention, even one willing to give a tame, non-confrontational, pre-approved speech.

+ Harris lost south Dearborn, Michigan, a 90% Muslim area that Biden won with 88% of the vote four years ago…

Trump: 46.8%
Harris: 27.68%
Stein: 22.11%

+ Dr. Gassan Abu Sitta: “Gone is a genocidal president too hypocritical to admit it. And in comes a genocidal president who wears it as a badge of honor.”

+Harris made little effort to court the youth vote and, at times, seemed to actively disdain it. They repaid her in kind. CBS News Exit Poll in Michigan: “Younger voters (age 18-29) are narrowly going for Trump right now…This deficit for Harris is largely due to younger men in Michigan who are more for Trump.”

+ Around 67% of voters rated the economy as “not so good/poor.” Dissatisfaction with the post-pandemic economy has been evident for at least two years. But Biden and Harris did nothing to address the core issue of the election except tell people that the economic pain they were feeling was psychosomatic.

+ According to the AP’s Votecast, Union members voted for Harris 57-39. Maybe the Harris campaign should have featured more Shawn Fain and less Liz Cheney and Mark Cuban.

+ Households $100,000 and under…

2020: Biden 70%, Trump 29%
2024: Harris 48%, Trump 49%

+ Both Harris and Biden turned their backs on the most successful and popular economic policies of the early Biden era in an attempt to convince the public the pandemic was over–even though COVID continued to sicken, kill and impoverish folks–all while Biden kept writing blank checks to Israel and Ukraine

+ Remember when the Democrats promised $2000 stimulus checks and then only delivered $1400? People living on the economic margins, as most of us were during the pandemic, have long memories….

+ Voters in the red state of Missouri voted to raise the statewide minimum wage to $15 by 2026 and guarantee paid sick days to workers. Nebraska voters also passed Initiative 436, giving workers the right to earn paid sick leave. Harris waited until the campaign’s last two weeks to call for a hike in the federal minimum wage.

+ Aside from Gaza and the economy, the Harris team seemed to totally misread the electorate, perhaps believing they could win on the gender gap (21 points) alone. They couldn’t. 71% of voters were White (up from 67% in 2020), 11% were Black (down from 13%), and 12% were Hispanic (slightly down from 13%. This “white surge” and “black/brown ebb” is at least in part because Harris didn’t give Blacks and Hispanics much of an affirmative reason to turn out to vote and many reasons to stay home.

+ Harris is no Claudia Scheinbaum…

Latino men, 2020: Biden 59%, Trump 36%
Latino men, 2024: Harris 45%, Trump 53%

+ Hidalgo County, Texas, is 92% Latino. Hilary Clinton won with 68.5%. Biden won with 58% of the vote. Harris and Trump are 50/50.

+ In 2016, HRC won Cameron County, Texas, which is 80% Hispanic, by 16%. Last night, with more than 95% of the vote counted, Trump was leading Harris 52% to 47%.

+ Ted Cruz won Latino voters by 6 points, according to NBC News exit polls. In his last race in 2018, Cruz lost Latinos by 29 points—a 35-point swing.

+ Some quarters expected Harris to have a shot at winning North Carolina. She didn’t. In fact, Trump won Anson County, North Carolina, which is 40% Black. This makes Trump only the second Republican to win this county since Reconstruction.

+ But it’s not just Hispanics and Black men. In NYC, with more than 95% of the vote in, Kamala Harris was polling at 67.8%. If that stands, it will be the worst performance for a Democratic Presidential candidate in the city since Dukakis in 1988…

+ Harris seems likely to lose the popular vote as well, which would relieve the Democrats of having to pretend to take action regarding the Electoral College.

+ The Democratic Senate candidates are running ahead of Harris by 1 to 3 percentage points, but they’ve already lost seats in WV and Ohio and are likely to lose Montana, as well, to a Republican who lied about being shot in Afghanistan.

+ Doug Henwood: “Tim Walz. Remember when he was a thing?”

+ Walz was a thing who was never let loose to do his thing…

+ Biden picking Merrick Garland as AG was the most self-defeating cabinet pick since Obama picked Tim Geithner to run Treasury and bail out the same bankers who’d screwed over the people who elected him.

+ In the end, Harris didn’t outperform Biden in a single county in the country.

+ Maybe they should’ve had a primary…?

Jeffrey St. Clair is editor of CounterPunch. His most recent book is An Orgy of Thieves: Neoliberalism and Its Discontents (with Alexander Cockburn). He can be reached at: sitka@comcast.net or on Twitter @JeffreyStClair3