Sunday, May 17, 2026

GREEN CAPITALI$M

Are solar panel prices about to surge? Why now might be the perfect time to invest

A team of solar installers set up a new rooftop solar system at a home in Manila, Philippines, on May 1, 2026.
Copyright Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.


By Liam Gilliver
Published on

Geopolitical uncertainty, supply shortages and China’s recent tax reform are threatening to send the prices of solar panels soaring. But, is it really that severe?

Once an extortionate investment reserved for the ‘eco-elite’, solar has rapidly become one of the cheapest electricity sources in the world. But, are the tables about to turn?

Solar photovoltaic (PV) panels, composed of individual solar cells that convert sunlight into electricity, have plummeted in price by a staggering 90 per cent in the last decade. According to Our World In Data, costs have dropped by around 20 per cent every time the global cumulative capacity doubles.

At the same time, the price of solar batteries, which allow households to store electricity during peak times, have also decreased by 90 per cent since 2010 due to advances in battery chemistry and manufacturing.

The EU now describes solar as a “shining star” of Europe’s clean transition, accounting for almost a quarter (23.4 per cent) of its electricity consumption in 2024. In June last year, the sun was the main source of the electricity generated in the EU.

Amid the war on Iran, solar is helping to cushion households from volatile fossil fuel shocks. Recent analysis found that harnessing sunlight for power saved Europe more than €100 million per day throughout March by reducing gas imports.

If prices remain high, due to Iran’s stranglehold on the Strait of Hormuz, experts say these savings could reach €67.5 billion by the end of the year.

The ongoing conflict in the Middle East has also bolstered interest in household electrification, with multiple energy firms across Europe reporting a recent spike in solar panel and solar battery inquiries.

However, as demand for solar panels soars, foreign tax policy, the price of silver and other influences could soon ignite a price surge.

Where does Europe get its solar panels from?

While the EU describes solar as having a “significant role in its transition towards cleaner, more affordable and secure” energy, it remains heavily reliant on countries outside of the bloc to make PV panels.

In 2024, the EU imported €14.6 billion in green energy products, including €11.1 billion worth of solar panels. China was by far the largest supplier of these panels, accounting for 98 per cent of all imports.

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), China has invested more than $50 billion (€43 billion) in new PV supply capacity – 10 times more than Europe – and created more than 300,000 manufacturing jobs across the solar PV value chain since 2011. Today, the country’s share in all of the manufacturing stages of solar panels exceeds 80 per cent globally.

“Chinese manufacturers have reached scale and cost levels that cannot be matched outside of China,” Jannik Schall of clean tech startup 1KOMMA5° tells Euronews Earth.

“There are factories in other countries, even in Europe, but they only focus on the final assembly of solar panels and cannot compete with China from a cost perspective.”

China’s monopoly on solar panels hasn’t been a clear victory for the country, with tight competition pushing companies to sell below cost. An IEA report from last year found that China-based solar companies had made cumulative net losses of around $5 billion (€4.3 billion) since the beginning of 2024.

This led to China’s Ministry of Finance and State Tax Administration announcing major reform to its generous renewables subsidies, which were originally designed to support foreign trading.

From 1 April 2026, the nine per cent VAT export rebate on solar products was eliminated, while the nine per cent VAT export rebate on battery products was reduced to six per cent. The VAT rebate on battery products will be completely scrapped from 1 January 2027.

Graph detailing China's solar exports.
Graph detailing China's solar exports. Ember

Just before the tax reform came into place, Chinese solar exports skyrocketed as countries scrambled to beat the price hike.

Energy think-tank Ember found that during March 2026, several European countries, including France, Italy, Poland and Romania, hit all-time records for the number of Chinese solar imports.

Will China’s VAT reform increase the cost of solar?

“The elimination of China’s VAT export rebates alone will cause module prices to rise by around 10 per cent,” Schall tells Euronews Earth. Solar modules is the standard-industry term for a single PV unit.

British newspaper The i has warned that one national solar installer has been forced to charge £800 (€918) more for an average rooftop installation.

So is a blanket price rise expected across the board? It’s not that simple.

Experts say that the market does not react this quickly, and the increasing price of solar panels won’t bite straight away.

Analysts do not expect the rise in cost to limit demand for solar, given its competitive pricing, either. However, it does demonstrate that even renewables are not completely shielded from the intricacies of geopolitics – an argument that frequently arises when speaking about fossil fuel shocks.

InfoLink Consulting, a Taipei-based firm that provides market intelligence, price forecasting and supply chain analysis for solar PV, says that while ground-mounted projects (often used in large-scale solar farms) have edged up in recent weeks, high order volumes have constrained any rise in average prices.

Meanwhile, the price of small-scale or ‘distributed’ solar power systems, like those installed directly on rooftops or carports, has continued to fall marginally, InfoLink said earlier this week (13 May).

How silver became solar’s crux

To understand why solar costs fluctuate, it’s important to understand how PV panels are designed.

Solar panels are predominantly made of glass, plastic polymer and aluminum. Silver, which is the most effective metallic conductor of electricity and heat, is also a key material for PV panels.

Despite representing less than five per cent of a total PV panel in terms of weight, silver paste accounts for up to 30 per cent of total solar cell costs, analysts at German technology group Heraeus state.

According to the Silver Institute, around 4,000 tonnes of silver, equivalent to 14 per cent of global silver consumption, were used for PV panel production in 2023 alone. Researchers warn this share is expected to increase to 20 per cent by 2030, a fourfold increase since 2014.

Chinese manufacturers have therefore been boosting efforts to tackle this, by replacing silver with cheaper metals such as copper. Experts predict switching from silver to copper-based metallisation could save the solar industry roughly $15 billion (€12.8 billion) per year globally.

However, the price of copper has also increased in recent years, albeit at a slower pace than silver.

“Driven by geopolitical uncertainty, supply shortages and increasing demand from AI data centres, prices for copper, aluminum and lithium have increased significantly since Q4 of 2025,” Schall explains.

“Silver prices have reached 150+ per cent increases within a few weeks in the beginning of 2026, making silver the biggest cost contributor in solar panels. These cost increases on the raw material side need time to trickle down through the value chain and are expected to reach end consumers this summer

1KOMMA5° forecasts that the additional high raw material costs, alongside China’s VAT elimination, could cause price increases of 15 to 20 per cent for individual components.

Schall adds that while residential customers will be affected by this in the “medium term” those wanting to install PV panels can still benefit from “more favourable prices” right now.

Euronews Earth reached out to two energy firms in Europe to ask whether they intend to raise their solar panel prices following China’s tax reform and the increasing price of silver. Both declined to comment.

Despite uncertainty, experts point out that solar prices are still around 50 per cent down compared to 2023, making it one of the cheapest sources of electricity in the world.

 

Germany revamps its energy laws, but risks locking itself into decades of costly gas import dependence

Germany revamps its energy laws, but risks locking itself into decades of costly gas import dependence
Germany is revamping its energy laws, but with a bias for gas over batteries risks locking itself into an expensive dependency. / bne IntelliNews
By Ben Aris in Berlin May 14, 2026

Germany risks locking itself into decades of costly gas import dependence unless policymakers give battery storage equal treatment in upcoming power market reforms, energy think-tank Ember has warned.

In a report published on May 13, Ember said Germany’s electricity system was at a “critical inflection point” as lawmakers debated reforms to the country’s renewables support scheme, grid legislation and the long-delayed Electricity Supply Security and Capacity Act, known as StromVKG. The legislation is expected to launch tenders for backup power capacity from September 2026 to secure electricity supplies during periods of low wind and solar generation, known in Germany as “Dunkelflaute”.

The think-tank warned that proposals favouring new gas-fired power plants in those auctions could slow the deployment of battery storage despite rapidly falling technology costs due to the battery revolution and a growing project pipeline.

Germany currently hosts about 25% of the EU’s large-scale battery storage capacity, with more than 2.5GW operational by the end of 2025, according to Ember. That figure has more than doubled from 1.2GW two years earlier. The group said more than 10GW of additional battery projects were in development as of December 2025, including 1.5GW already under construction. However, as IntelliNews reported, due to a battery gap Europe as a whole and Germany in particular, only has 15 minutes of battery storage time at a grid level, not enough to impact peak period prices. It needs to scale up to at least 60 minutes and trails other European countries.

Ember estimated that if Germany’s planned battery pipeline of 10.5GW and 26.3GWh had been operational in 2025, it could have prevented roughly one-third of wind and solar curtailment. Germany curtailed 8TWh of renewable electricity last year, equivalent to 3.4% of total wind and solar output.

The avoided curtailment could have reduced redispatch costs and gas purchases by about €0.8bn, exceeding the estimated annual investment cost of €145mn ($163mn) required over the batteries’ lifetime, the report said.

Germany’s residential battery market is also expanding rapidly. More than two million home battery systems have been installed, with roughly one in six homeowners already using the technology. A survey by the Institute for Demoscopy Allensbach found that 30% of homeowners were considering purchasing a battery within the next five years.

“What is missing is regulatory clarity. The upcoming Electricity Supply Security and Capacity Act and grid package should treat battery storage as a first-order solution for grid stabilization and flexibility – not an afterthought. Preferential pathways for gas in capacity auctions – as envisaged in the current draft bill – would delay the deployment of clean technologies that are already cost-competitive and shovel-ready. What Germany needs is a coherent clean flexibility strategy: a framework that gives equal standing to batteries at all scales, demand-side flexibility (including from electric vehicles and heat pumps) and smarter grid infrastructure, alongside concrete targets for non-fossil flexibility capacity,” Ember said.

Bangalore: India's Silicon Valley, a city straining under pressure


Issued on: 15/05/2026 - FRANCE24


15:31 min From the show


Over the past 25 years, Bengaluru, still popularly known as Bangalore, has transformed into India's Silicon Valley. The South Indian city of nearly 15 million people is now home to global tech giants including Apple, Microsoft, Intel, Adobe and Boeing, as well as thousands of startups. But this rapid development comes with environmental consequences. Our correspondents report.

Bangalore's transformation began in the 1990s, after India opened up its economy and introduced new software and computer policies. Global companies like Dell, IBM and Bosch started outsourcing operations to Bangalore, attracted by lower labour costs, a large English-speaking workforce and the city's strong educational ecosystem.

Alongside IT services, Bangalore also became a major hub for Business Process Outsourcing, handling customer support, finance and back-office operations for companies around the world.

In the 2010s came a shift: the city was no longer just outsourcing, it was innovating. Bangalore shifted from backend services to R&D and entrepreneurship. The city saw a startup boom and is now home to over 16,000 startups.

From seven to 15 million inhabitants in a quarter of a century

But Bangalore's growth came at a cost. Millions of people moved there in search of opportunities, placing enormous pressure on the metropolis. Bangalore is now ranked as the world's second most congested city after Mexico City.

Wetlands, lakebeds and natural drainage channels have been built over to make space for offices and housing, leaving parts of the city flooded during monsoon rains. Shrinking lakes and excessive groundwater extraction have also deepened water shortages. With a daily water deficit of nearly 500 million litres, many residents now depend on private water tankers.

As India pushes to become a global data-centre hub, concerns are growing over sustainability. Bangalore alone hosts around 31 data centres, with a single one-megawatt facility consuming nearly 68,000 litres of water every day for cooling. Environmentalists warn that unchecked urban growth without ecological planning could leave the city increasingly vulnerable to climate change.



Current AI Model Inadequacies: Implications For The Global South – Analysis


May 17, 2026 
Observer Research Foundation
By Prateek Tripathi


The current Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution was largely driven by the development of the transformer model architecture in 2017 and the subsequent creation of Large Language Models (LLMs). The majority of ensuing progress in AI has largely hinged on LLMs, including generative AI (GenAI), diffusion models, and Agentic AI. The seemingly remarkable progress made by these models has led to a multitude of claims by AI developers and experts, ranging from mass potential layoffs to the supposedly near-term prospect of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).

On closer inspection, however, most of these arguments seem to fall apart, with AI adoption and automation witnessing widespread failure across multiple domains and use cases. Moreover, the current hyperscaling model of AI development is gradually becoming unsustainable due to ever-increasing energy and resource requirements, further compounded by the massive debts being incurred by AI companies and hyperscalers pursuing it. This should serve as a wake-up call for the Global South, which is in the process of honing and deploying its own sovereign AI capabilities. In the aftermath of the IndiaAI Impact Summit 2026, these issues further necessitate a reassessment of the Global South’s current development model and underscore the need to retain its human-centric roots rather than relying on its increasingly AI-centric propensities.

Identifying Failures in AI Use Cases and Deployment

Since the inception of GenAI, multiple company executives have repeatedly claimed that AI would imminently automate tasks hitherto performed by humans, particularly in areas such as coding and remote labour. However, these claims have been undermined on multiple occasions. According to a randomised controlled trial conducted by Model Evaluation and Threat Research (METR) in 2025, open-source coders utilising AI took 19 percent longer to perform tasks than those operating without AI. The Remote Labour Index, developed by the Foundation for QC Innovation at IISc Bengaluru’s Centre for AI Safety and ScaleAI, found that virtually all frontier AI models remain woefully inadequate at automating remote labour tasks, with the best-performing model (Opus 4.6) achieving an automation rate of just 4.17 percent.

According to MIT’s State of AI in Business 2025 report, 95 percent of GenAI pilot projects have reportedly failed. Examples of failed AI adoption include multiple corporations such as McDonald’s, DPD, Air Canada, Klarna, and Salesforce, some of which fired employees in favour of AI agents only to subsequently re-hire them. Different sectors, such as fintech, healthcare, education, manufacturing, and government, each face their own misgivings regarding AI adoption. For example, multiple studies by the University of Oxford and Stanford University have pointed out the dangers of employing AI chatbots in healthcare. A recent study by the Emergency Care Research Institute (ECRI) identified the misuse of AI chatbots as the top health technology hazard in 2026.


This is further compounded by a deliberate obfuscation of the term “AI” to circumvent scrutiny, using it to describe tasks that do not require AI whatsoever. For instance, Norwegian tech company 1X announced NEO, the world’s first consumer-ready humanoid robot, in 2025. While NEO initially claimed to utilise AI, it was later found to rely on remote employees to perform certain tasks, potentially violating user privacy while claiming to be AI-automated.

Consequently, while AI automation remains in vogue amongst AI developers and enthusiasts, in several cases, it appears to function as a guise for austerity measures. Despite multiple claims to the contrary, the body of peer-reviewed and rigorous research on successful AI use cases is quite limited, with LLMs serving as inadequate replacements for humans in the vast majority of cases while facilitating an actively inhibitory supplementary effect in several others.

The Unsustainable Nature of Current AI Models

In addition to the aforementioned adoption failures, the massive energy requirements of data centres are steadily making the current hyperscaling model of AI development unsustainable, with multiple instancesof widespread blackouts, water shortages, and air pollution prompting numerous community protestsaround the globe. For instance, data centres already account for over 4.4 percent of annual US electricity consumption as of 2023, a figure that has nearly doubled since 2018. Furthermore, AI power bottlenecks have led to widespread delays in multiple data centre projects, with about 11 GW of planned 2026 global capacity remaining “in the announced stage with no signs of construction.”


Figure 1: Global Data Centre Capacity Additions by Operation Date (in Gigawatts)
Source: Axios

On the financial front, most pure-play AI companies and hyperscalers have amassed massive debts due to limited return on investment, leading to increasing claims of circular investments and an imminent burst of the so-called “AI bubble”. For instance, despite over US$ 1.4 trillion in financial commitments, OpenAI registered an annual revenue of only about US$ 20 billion in 2025. The situation is similar for hyperscalers such as CoreWeave, which plans to spend US$30–35 billion in 2026 despite an annual revenue of just over US$ 5 billion in 2025.

While capital misallocation has been a common feature of tech booms such as the “Dot Com Bubble” in the past, the chief difference was that most of the built infrastructure was eventually salvageable even after the bubble burst. In the case of the AI bubble, the massive data centre infrastructure currently being built will have very limited utility once LLMs plateau. However, with Big Tech companies now firmly locked into the lengthy and cost-intensive hyperscaling paradigm, they do not possess the option to course-correct any longer.

Why AI Adoption Fails: The Fundamental Problem with LLMs

One of the primary reasons for the current interest and historic investments in large pre-trained models and the hyperscaling paradigm is the “emergent abilities” of LLMs, particularly when it comes to plausible reasoning, resulting in widespread speculation that they will inevitably evolve into increasingly efficient models, eventually paving the way to achieving the holy grail of AGI. However, there is evidence suggestingthat emergent abilities in LLMs are most likely an artefact of inadequate metrics and benchmarks. Furthermore, the rise in benchmark performance as LLMs scale may be a function of enhanced pattern memorisation rather than reasoning or linguistic abilities and is poised to plateau in the future, especially under more sophisticated benchmarks.

According to a survey conducted by the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) involving 475 experts, 76 percent of respondents stated that current machine learning paradigms are unlikely to yield AGI. Factuality remains a fundamental limitation in current LLMs and GenAI systems, contributing to issues including hallucinations and biases and undermining AI trustworthiness.

While approaches to improve factuality include reinforcement learning, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, and Chain-of-Thought reasoning, future AI advancement may rely on the development of new or hybrid neural network architectures, such as neuro-symbolic reasoning systems, as well as non-neural architectures such as Information Lattice Learning. However, these alternative paradigms remain at an early stage of development.

This suggests that the current AI paradigm, largely hinging on LLMs, suffers from systemic and structural inadequacies, rendering it unsuitable for mass applicability. Therefore, AI deployment requires enhanced scrutiny, particularly in use cases affecting critical human sectors.

Conclusion: The Case for a Human-Centric Global South Agenda

AI adoption and cooperation in the Global South, particularly in the realm of human and societal development, served as a major theme for the IndiaAI Impact Summit 2026. However, the dangers posed by rushing AI adoption cast this approach into serious doubt. For those claiming to maximise societal benefit, the current risks posed by LLMs far outweigh the benefits accruing from their mass adoption. Far from simply being a matter of hallucinations or fabricated outputs, societal AI applications affect real people and risk having a detrimental impact on their livelihoods.

This is not to say that AI is of no societal benefit. There have been multiple instances of successful AI utility. For instance, India’s deployment of chatbots for language translation through platforms such as Bhashinihas been demonstrably successful. Research tools such as AlphaFold have been highly effective in accelerating scientific innovation to the extent that the Google DeepMind team received a Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2024. However, it must be emphasised that while AI can serve as a tool for supplementing human capabilities, it is far from replacing them and continues to require substantial human intervention and oversight. Furthermore, the primary reason behind such successful AI use cases is that errant outputs do not carry significant real-world consequences in these contexts. For instance, a hallucinated language translation or ChatGPT response does not pose a serious threat to any individual’s livelihood. On the other hand, even a small proportion of such outputs could have severe ramifications in the case of a healthcare chatbot or a farming assistant.


The global AI adoption narrative has had the unfortunate effect of gradually reducing human utility to the level of inhabiting mere points on a dataset, an antithesis to the decades-long pursuit of the Global South’s human development and inclusion agenda. Fast-tracking AI adoption under global peer pressure or succumbing to the “Fear of Missing Out” can have catastrophic consequences for the Global South, which risks falling victim to clever marketing strategies engineered by a handful of corporations. Consequently, the Global South needs to realign its increasingly AI-focused development agenda, centring it on labour rights and human development rather than merely prioritising AI adoption. It must identify risk-free AI adoption use cases and target sectors where it can have maximum utility while resisting the mass AI adoption narrative, at the very least in critical sectors where it serves to have even a minimal detrimental human impact.


About the author: Prateek Tripathi is an Associate Fellow with the Centre for Security, Strategy and Technology (CSST) at the Observer Research Foundation.

Source: This article was published by the Observer Research Foundation.

 

Malta offers free ChatGPT Plus access to its citizens through a national AI program

Scenery of Malta
Copyright Canva

By Roselyne Min
Published on


Citizens and residents registered with Malta’s online identity system can apply to get access to ChatGPT Plus after completing a free online course.

OpenAI has signed its first partnership with a national government bringing the paid version of ChatGPT for free to residents of Malta.

OpenAI and the Government of Malta on Saturday announced a deal that will give every citizen free access to the artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot for one year through a government-led AI literacy programme.

Citizens and residents registered with Malta’s online identity system can apply after completing a free online course called AI for All, developed by the University of Malta.

According to the Malta Digital Innovation Authority, the course is designed to help people understand what AI is, what it can and cannot do, and how to use it responsibly at home and at work.

The first phase of the programme will launch in May, according to the announcement.

The Malta Digital Innovation Authority will manage access to the free subscriptions, and it said the programme will grow as more people complete the course.

“By pairing this education with free access to the most advanced digital tools available today, we are turning an unfamiliar concept into practical assistance for our families, students, and workers,” said Silvio Schembri, the country’s minister for economy, enterprise and strategic projects, in an announcement.

The partnership is the first of its kind, according to the announcement.

“Malta is leading the way by showing how countries can empower their citizens to benefit from the transformative potential of AI,” said George Osborne, head of OpenAI for Countries, an initiative by OpenAI “built around local priorities”.

The partnership is part of a growing trend among governments to find practical ways to help people build confidence using AI and apply it to everyday tasks.

Last year, Anthropic announced a project that gives all teachers in Iceland access to Claude, its AI assistant, to help with lesson planning, classroom materials and administrative tasks.

In September 2025, OpenAI announced a partnership with the Greek government to bring its technology to secondary schools and start-ups across the country.

Meanwhile, in February 2025, the UK government signed a memorandum of understanding with Anthropic to improve how people access and interact with government information and services online.


Anthropic explains Claude's 'go to bed' messages as quirky AI trait

15.05.2026, DPA

Bed - Anthropic clarified that its Claude chatbot's habit of telling users to "get some sleep" or "go rest" is more of a quirky behavior than a built-in feature.

Photo: Alicia Windzio/-/dpa

Anthropic clarified that its Claude chatbot's habit of telling users to "get some sleep" or "go rest" is more of a quirky behavior than a built-in feature.

For months now, users have noticed that Claude occasionally suggests hitting the hay after long chats, leading to some chatter about whether the company is trying to encourage healthier usage or maybe even cut down on computing usage.

Sam McAllister, who is part of the company's leadership group, mentioned in a post on X that this behavior is "a bit of a character tic" and that Anthropic plans to tackle it in future versions.

These unusual responses are reminiscent of other artificial intelligence (AI) quirks, like ChatGPT's earlier "Goblin Mode," which was eventually fixed.

This year, Anthropic has faced several service outages due to the increasing demand for Claude, especially from software developers.



China’s Unitree unveils a rideable, wall-smashing robot straight out of science fiction


By Theo Farrant
Published on

A Chinese robotics company has started selling a giant pilotable robot. It costs €500,000, walks on two legs, and can also smash through walls. Welcome to the future?

For a generation raised on Pacific Rim, Gundam, Alien and Transformers, the fantasy has never really left the imagination: being able to climb into a giant mechanical robot suit and walk away in it.

This week, that fantasy stopped being fiction.

Unitree Robotics - the Chinese company that has quickly become one of the world's most prolific robot manufacturers - unveiled the GD01, which is being billed as the world's first production-ready manned transformable mecha.

It's roughly 2.8 metres tall and lets a human pilot climb up and operate it from an open cockpit in its torso. It can walk upright on two legs in humanoid stance or reconfigure its build to move on four legs for rougher terrain.

Promotional footage even shows it smashing through a wall of cinder blocks.

But it's unlikely most of us will be using these to get from A to B anytime soon. The starting price is 3.9 million yuan, nearly €500,000. And Unitree has not yet publicly disclosed key technical details such as battery life, maximum speed, payload capacity or operating duration.

From robot dogs to giant mechas

Founded in 2016 in Hangzhou by engineer Wang Xingxing, the company began with quadruped “robot dogs” inspired by research platforms like Boston Dynamics’ Spot robot.

Wang reportedly built his first quadruped robot as part of a university thesis before leaving drone giant DJI to start his own company.

A decade on, Unitree controls roughly 70 percent of the global quadruped robot market and in 2025 it shipped more than 5,500 humanoid robots - which is more than any other manufacturer on earth, including Tesla. Its robots even appeared during China's hugely watched Spring Festival Gala television show.

What would a giant robot like this actually be useful for?

This remains the big unanswered question.

Unitree says the GD01 is aimed at "high-value markets" including industrial operations, emergency rescue and for cultural tourism.

In theory, systems like this could eventually be used in disaster zones, collapsed buildings, hazardous industrial sites or environments where wheeled vehicles struggle.

There are also obvious military implications - although Unitree explicitly describes the GD01 as a civilian platform and warned users to operate it in a "friendly and safe manner."

The broader robotics industry has long explored similar ideas. Powered exoskeletons already exist in medicine, logistics and defence

Companies including Sarcos Technology and Robotics Corporation, Hyundai Motor Company and Lockheed Martin have spent years developing wearable robotic systems that enhance lifting strength or reduce worker fatigue.

Humanoid robotics boom

Humanoid robotics is currently going through one of its biggest investment booms in decades. Companies across the US, China and Europe are racing to build general-purpose robots capable of working in warehouses, factories and eventually homes.

Tesla is developing its Optimus humanoid robot. Figure AI has partnered with BMW. Agility Robotics already has warehouse robots operating commercially.

China, meanwhile, is scaling up extremely quickly.

In April, Chinese smartphone company Honor made global headlines when its humanoid robot completed a half marathon in Beijing in 50 minutes and 26 seconds - beating the human world record by nearly seven minutes.

According to research cited by the South China Morning Post, Chinese companies accounted for nearly 90 percent of global humanoid robot sales in 2025.

Official data also show that China had more than 140 humanoid robot manufacturers and over 330 models in 2025.

Accelerating the development of technologies such as humanoid robots was listed a priority in Beijing’s latest five-year plan, which has pledged to “target the frontiers of science and technology”.

The GD01 is undeniably one of the most eye-catching product to emerge from this race so far. But whether it's a glimpse of a genuinely useful future technology, or an elaborate, marketing proof of concept, is a question the industry is still working out how to answer.

 

Trip to recovery: How psychedelics could revolutionise mental health care

Psychedelic-assisted therapies have shown promise in treating the cognitive ruts of several mental health conditions.
Copyright Canva

By Amber Louise Bryce
Published on


In a world gripped by a growing mental health crisis, research suggests that psychedelic-assisted therapy could be an answer. Euronews Health spoke to an expert about how they work, and when - if ever - we might see them approved.

Picture this: You walk into a small, dimly lit room and lay on a bed beside a clinician. After talking you through what’s going to happen, they hand you an eye mask, then administer a controlled dose of the psychedelic compound, psilocybin.

As suddenly as the drug takes effect, the world as you knew it starts to dissolve - the chains of old thought patterns finally loosen.

While it might sound intense, this scenario could be a future reality for those living with treatment resistant mental illness, including depression and post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

In recent years, psychedelic-assisted therapies have become one of the most fascinating and fast-accelerating areas of psychiatric research, driven by an ever-growing body of exciting new evidence.

The current mental health crisis has also created an urgency for new, more effective treatment options, with over a billion people currently living with mental health disorders, according to the World Health Organization (WHO).

“Unfortunately, in mental health, and specifically in psychiatry, we haven't really had any new treatments for several decades,” Dr Liliana Galindo, an assistant professor at the University of Cambridge’s psychiatry department, told Euronews Health.

“What psychedelics are bringing is the opportunity to have or to present new treatments for people that don't respond to the usual treatments.”

Psychedelics are a class of psychoactive substances that can powerfully alter people's perceptions and moods by binding to serotonin receptors. Popular examples include psilocybin, DMT, phenethylamines (MDMA) and lysergamides (LSD).

While they all share similar consciousness-expanding qualities, each compound varies in its intensity, duration, and overall effect, with different ones being tested for different conditions.

So far, psilocybin, an active ingredient in magic mushrooms, has generated the most promising results.

“For treating depression, psilocybin, specifically the COMP360 (a synthetic formulation of psilocybin developed by Compass Pathways), has already finished phase three of its clinical trials. We are expecting that [Compass] is going to file the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) application soon,” Galindo said.

“Potentially, this could be the very first psychedelic treatment that will be legal and approved.”

How do psychedelic-assisted therapies work?

Up until now, mental health treatments have relied on two evidence-based methods: talk therapies and medications such as antidepressants.

These are proven to be effective, with patients receiving a combination of the two 25-27% more likely to respond positively, according to statistics by the National Institutes of Health.

But for those that don’t respond, other avenues of help remain limited.

“Many mental health conditions have some symptoms that are common, like rigid cognitions. So, for example, when people are depressed, they start to have really negative thoughts, and these negative thoughts are going to affect how they see themselves, how they see the world, and of course, how they are going to feel about it. And after several years of being depressed, it's really difficult to take a step outside of those pessimistic thoughts, or frequent fears and even suicidal ideations,” Galindo explained.

For these cases, psychedelic medications could be the answer, with Galindo noting their effectiveness at disrupting cognitive ruts and rewiring how the brain processes trauma.

“I really like an analogy I saw once [about psychedelic medications] that it's like when you're skiing. You usually go for a certain pathway, right? And because the pathway has a specific mark, it is really difficult to actually go outside of it. But somehow, what psilocybin allows, is like having fresh snow that will make it easier to actually explore different pathways.”

Numerous studies back this, with a recent one by Imperial College London - considered a world leader in psychedelic research - reporting that even a single dose of psilocybin can prompt anatomical changes in the brain.

Other psychoactive compounds such as MDMA have been shown to work a little differently by enhancing feelings of empathy, connectivity and openness, which could be effective at treating PTSD.

“It facilitates a period of time where people [with PTSD] can revisit their memories and somehow be able to rethink, to reframe, to change the narrative and to process their trauma,” she said.

“This is the reason psychedelics are bringing such a big revolution to mental health, because they're aiming to treat the core rather than only the symptoms.”

Social stigmas and legal issues

A major hurdle to mainstream approval, however, remains their status as illegal drugs in most countries.

“Unfortunately, even if we have clear evidence for their therapeutic potential, they are still illegal. For example, here in the UK, they're still classified A, meaning that in order to conduct any study, we need to apply for a special home office licence. This is not only expensive, but takes a long time, and so is definitely affecting the amount of research that could be happening in the field,” Galindo said.

Another issue is the stigmas surrounding these drugs, and their primary associations with party culture and potentially dangerous outcomes.

Galindo emphasises that these concerns are why the controlled setting of psychedelic-assisted therapies is so important.

“You need to take care of all the different details of the environment, like the sound, the lights. And of course, the entire time [the patient] is supported by a trained therapist or a member of the staff that is there to be able to support during that process,” she said.

“These drugs are really powerful tools, but of course, if for any reason they are not given in the right setting, this could come with more side effects.”

While more research is required to better understand who will benefit and who won’t, Galindo hopes that, one day, these treatments can become an accessible option for everyone.

“Rather than staying in a private setting, they should be available for the people who need it the most, not only for the ones that can pay.”

Early Signs From India About Rapprochement With Pakistan And Iran – Analysis


May 17, 2026 
By P. K. Balachandran


The signs emanated from the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh and India-Iran interactions at the BRICS Foreign Ministers’ meeting in New Delhi.

Given the changing international landscape, India is seeing new openings vis-à-vis China, Pakistan and Iran, with which its relations have been strained.

Despite the lack of progress in talks with China on the border issue, and China’s open support for Pakistan during the May 2025 India-Pakistan air war, New Delhi has selectively opened up its industrial sector for Chinese investment for the sake of rapid industrial growth.

As a way out of the India-China border conflict, former Indian army chief Gen. M.M.Naravane suggested that India and China could discuss the 1959 Chinese suggestion that India give Aksai Chin in the Western sector to China in exchange for China’s dropping its claim over Arunachal Pradesh in the Eastern Sector.

The Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS), which is the institutional ideologue for Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), has said that while India should strongly respond to Pakistan’s act of backing cross-border terror attacks, India should keep its doors open for talks with Islamabad.

“If Pakistan is like a pinprick trying to create incidents like Pulwama, etc., we have to answer appropriately according to the situation because the security and self-respect of a country and nation have to be protected, and the government of the day should take note of it and take care of it. But at the same time, we should not close the doors. We should always be ready to engage in dialogue. That is why diplomatic relations are maintained, trade and commerce continue, and visas are being given. So, we should not stop these, because there should always be a window for dialogue,” Dattatreya Hosabale told the Indian-State backed news agency Press Trust of India.

To a question whether sporting events between India and Pakistan should resume, Hosabale said, “Of course, they can continue because I believe strongly that ultimately civil society relations will work. Because we have a cultural relation and we have been one nation.”.

Former army chief, Gen. Naravane, who had earlier suggested a diplomatic solution to the India-China conflict based on give and take, endorsed Hosabale’s idea in another media interview, showing a change of attitude towards Pakistan that had been routinely and publicly described as an “enemy nation.”

Currently, all contacts, including in culture and sports. Stand suspended.

Positive Response from Pakistan


Reacting to the RSS official’s statement, Pakistan said that the call for an India-Pakistan dialogue was a “positive development” and signalled support for backchannel talks.

The Pakistan Foreign Office spokesman Tahir Andrabi said: “Voices within India calling for dialogue are obviously a positive development”. Signalling support for backchannel talks, Andrabi said he would not comment on the subject as that would defeat the purpose of having backchannels.

Rapprochement With Iran


Simultaneously, India is also trying to patch up with Iran but without alienating the US and Israel, which have critical economic and security ties with New Delhi.

Throughout the US-Iran war, India had remained neutral so as not to jeopardise its relations with the US and Israel. But anxious to get Iran’s permission for its oil-bearing vessels to use the blocked Strait of Hormuz, India used the BRICS Foreign Ministers’ conference in New Delhi on May 14 and 15 to talk to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi to iron out the differences.

Araghchi’s meetings with the Indian Foreign Minister S.Jaishankar were cordial and fruitful, according to both sides. While Jaishankar said that he had detailed discussions with Araghchi, the latter referred to Jaishankar as his friend and urged India to restart the stalled Chahbahar port project. Araghchi also met Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

In a sign of improved relations, Indian vessels are now passing through the Strait of Hormuz, though, earlier, two of them had been subjected to attacks by unidentified parties.

Iran Unhappy with Pakistani Mediation


In a move indicating Iran’s disillusionment with Pakistan, which is mediating between Tehran and Washington, Iran’s National Security and Foreign Policy Spokesperson, Ebrahim Rezai, accused Islamabad of acting in the interests of the United States.

“Pakistan is our good friend and neighbour, but it is not suitable as a mediator for negotiations and does not have the necessary authority to fulfil this role. They always take into account the interests of US President Donald Trump and do not say anything that would go against the wishes of the Americans,” Rezai posted in Persian on his social media handle.

Meanwhile, Pakistan had announced the complete lifting of restrictions in its capital, Islamabad, which means that at the moment, negotiations between Iran and the United States stand suspended.

India Keeps Up Ties With UAE

However, despite its attempt to patch things up with Iran, India is strengthening its ties with the UAE, with which Iran is at odds because the UAE is close to the US and Israel.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi flew to Abu Dhabi on May 15 as part of a five-nation tour. In his meeting with the UAE Emir, Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, a wide range of issues, including trade, investment, defence cooperation, energy security and the welfare of the Indian diaspora living in the Gulf nation were discussed.

The visit also focused on strengthening the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership between India and the UAE, which has emerged as one of India’s most important strategic relationships in the Gulf region.

During the visit, India and the UAE concluded two important memorandums of understanding about Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) and Strategic Petroleum Reserves, aimed at strengthening India’s long-term energy security amid global volatility in oil markets.

The two countries also agreed on a framework for strategic defence cooperation. In another significant development, the two sides signed an MoU for setting up a ship repair cluster at Vadinar in Gujarat’s Dwarka district.

The visit additionally saw investment announcements worth nearly USD 5 billion in Indian infrastructure projects as well as investments in the RBL Bank and Samman Capital.

The UAE is India’s third-largest trading partner and the seventh-largest source of cumulative foreign investment into India over the last 25 years. With long-term supply agreements already in place, the Gulf nation continues to remain one of India’s most dependable energy partners despite the ongoing turmoil in West Asia.

The point to note is that despite its moves to make up with Iran, Modi condemned Iran’s attacks on UAE, though he did not name Iran as the attacker.


“We strongly condemn the attacks launched on the UAE. The manner in which the UAE has been targeted is not acceptable in any form. We welcome the steps taken by you to uphold national unity, security and regional integrity,” the Prime Minister said during his meeting with Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

PM Modi also thanked the UAE leadership for ensuring the safety and welfare of the 4.5 million-strong Indian community living in the country during the attacks and tensions.

“For the care provided to the Indian diaspora residing in the UAE in these difficult times, the manner in which they were considered as members of one’s own family by the UAE Government, you and the Royal Family, I express my heartfelt gratitude,” he said.

The Prime Minister reiterated India’s position that dialogue and diplomacy remain the only sustainable path for resolving regional conflicts.

“The impact of war in the West Asia region is seen across the world today. India has always given importance to dialogue and diplomacy for resolving issues. It is our biggest concern that Hormuz remains free and open. In this regard, it is essential to abide by international laws,” Modi said.

“India stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the UAE in every situation, and it will continue to do so. For the restoration of peace and stability, India will extend all possible cooperation,” the Prime Minister added.
Hundreds of diplomats fired by Trump in 'unprecedented' move amid global crisis: report

Bennito L. Kelty
May 16, 2026 
RAW STORY


U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio speaks to reporters as U.S. President Donald Trump stands next to him aboard Air Force One en route to Tokyo, Japan, for the second stop on his Asia tour, October 27, 2025. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

Hundreds of diplomats are being forced out of their jobs by the Trump administration despite ongoing crises around the world, according to a new report.

According to CNN, the State Department finalized the firing of nearly 250 foreign service officers via email on Friday.


"Your reduction in force separation will be effective today," the email read. "Thank you again for your service to the Department."

The reduction in forces also impacted staff that would have been able to "provide guidance on the war in Iran," former officials told CNN.

On top of that, "unprecedented numbers of people are choosing to leave" U.S. foreign services, David Kostelancik, a retired diplomat, told CNN.

"Roughly 2,000 foreign service officers left the State Department last year," CNN reported based on numbers from the American Foreign Service Association.

Another 100 diplomatic posts around the world in tense areas like the Middle East, Ukraine and Russia still lack a Senate-confirmed ambassador, CNN added.

"The most sensitive diplomatic negotiations, on fraught topics like ending the war in Iran and securing an end to the Ukraine conflict, are being led by business associates and family members of President Donald Trump," CNN reported. "Often without teams of experienced diplomats with regional expertise."