Wednesday, February 25, 2026

The AI Boom Is Powering a Nuclear Renaissance

  • Hyperscale AI data centers require city-scale electricity loads, making dependable baseload power a strategic necessity.

  • Microsoft and Amazon are forming direct nuclear partnerships and pursuing advanced reactor technologies to secure long-term energy supply.

  • Energy infrastructure, particularly nuclear generation and uranium supply, is emerging as a structural beneficiary of AI-driven demand growth.

For years, Silicon Valley took electricity for granted. The cloud sounded intangible, almost detached from the physical world. But now, artificial intelligence is ending that illusion. Behind every large language model and AI assistant sits a growing fleet of data centers that require enormous and continuous amounts of power.

Industry analysts estimate that a single hyperscale AI data center can demand 300 to 500 megawatts of electricity, comparable to the consumption of a mid-sized city. Multiply that across dozens of facilities under construction, and energy supply becomes less of an operating expense and more of a strategic constraint.

Microsoft and Amazon are responding with moves that signal a fundamental shift. Instead of relying solely on renewable energy contracts or traditional grid access, which alienates communities by driving up utility bills, both companies are securing direct relationships with nuclear power generation. In practical terms, they are beginning to operate like long-term energy planners rather than pure technology companies.

AI Turns Electricity into a Strategic Advantage

Modern AI systems run continuously. Training models, serving queries, and maintaining uptime require stable, round-the-clock power. Intermittent resources such as wind and solar remain essential parts of the energy mix, but they cannot guarantee the steady output required by massive computing clusters without additional firm generation or storage.

For years, technology companies relied on renewable energy credits to balance their emissions claims. That accounting approach becomes harder to maintain when the scale of electricity demand rises dramatically. If an AI facility must operate regardless of weather conditions or time of day, dependable baseload power becomes indispensable.

Electricity is shifting from a background cost to a defining competitive factor.

Microsoft’s Nuclear Strategy Moves from Theory to Reality

Microsoft’s involvement in restarting the former Three Mile Island Unit 1 reactor, now known as the Crane Clean Energy Center, represents one of the clearest signals of this transition. Constellation Energy secured a $1 billion Department of Energy loan in late 2025 to accelerate the restart, with commercial operation targeted around 2027.

Restarting an existing reactor offers a faster path to reliable carbon-free generation than building new infrastructure from scratch. For Microsoft, the project provides long-term power certainty while helping stabilize the surrounding grid.

The company is also pursuing longer-term energy innovation. Microsoft signed a power purchase agreement tied to a planned fusion facility developed by Helion Energy, reflecting a willingness to invest in future technologies that could provide high-density energy at scale. Fusion remains an ambitious goal, but the partnership underscores how seriously Microsoft views future electricity constraints.

Taken together, these steps show a company moving beyond buying power toward influencing how it is produced.

Amazon’s Approach: Control, Location, and Vertical Integration

Amazon’s strategy emphasizes control over energy supply. Its acquisition of the Cumulus Data Center campus from Talen Energy provides direct access to electricity generated by the Susquehanna nuclear facility. This “behind-the-meter” model allows the company to avoid some transmission bottlenecks and grid congestion challenges that increasingly delay new data center development.

Co-locating computing infrastructure with firm generation can shorten timelines and reduce uncertainty. As utilities struggle to expand transmission networks fast enough to meet demand, proximity to power becomes a competitive advantage.

Amazon is also investing in advanced nuclear development. Partnerships involving Energy Northwest and X-energy aim to deploy small modular reactors capable of delivering nearly a gigawatt of reliable capacity tailored to industrial-scale electricity needs.

Rather than treating energy procurement as a secondary function, Amazon appears to be integrating it directly into its long-term infrastructure strategy.

Why Nuclear Energy Is Returning to the Conversation

Renewable energy continues to grow rapidly, but the requirements of AI highlight the need for complementary sources of firm generation. High-performance computing environments cannot tolerate frequent power variability.

Nuclear energy aligns with several critical requirements:

  • Capacity factors typically exceeding 90 percent
  • Continuous output suited for constant workloads
  • Minimal direct carbon emissions
  • Operational lifetimes measured in decades

These attributes make nuclear power an increasingly attractive partner for large-scale AI infrastructure.

Implications for Investors

The convergence of artificial intelligence and energy infrastructure is reshaping how markets evaluate certain sectors. Nuclear operators and energy infrastructure companies are increasingly viewed as strategic enablers of technological growth rather than slow-moving defensive assets.

Companies such as Constellation Energy and Vistra benefit from existing generation fleets aligned with rising data center demand. Meanwhile, renewed interest in nuclear capacity could strengthen the uranium supply chain, supporting companies like uranium producer Cameco.

Electricity supply is emerging as a structural driver of technology investment decisions.

The Real Constraint Behind the AI Boom

Technology companies spent years trying to abstract away the physical world. Artificial intelligence is forcing a return to fundamentals. Computing power ultimately depends on energy density, infrastructure, and reliability.

Microsoft and Amazon are not abandoning renewable energy goals. They are acknowledging that scaling AI requires firm power that operates continuously. In that sense, the next phase of technological competition may hinge less on software breakthroughs and more on access to dependable electricity.

The companies that secure reliable energy first may hold the strongest advantage in the race to scale artificial intelligence.

By Robert Rapier  for Oilprice.com


ACCELERATIONISM

Scientists Develop Accelerator That Could Slash Nuclear Waste Lifespan by 99%

  • U.S. scientists are developing an innovation that could reduce nuclear waste storage time by 99.7%, transmuting long-lived radioactive materials into shorter-lived isotopes.

  • The Jefferson Lab project, funded under the $8.17 million NEWTON program, is advancing new superconducting accelerator technology, though it remains in the research phase and years away from large-scale deployment.

  • Meanwhile, countries like Finland and Sweden are moving ahead with deep geological repositories, as nuclear power capacity is projected to more than double globally by 2050.

For decades, nuclear energy has been regarded as the black sheep of the energy universe, thanks to drawbacks such as high costs, risk of thermal runaway leading to catastrophic accidents as well as the hazardous by-products of nuclear plants. Nuclear waste is notorious for the fact that it can remain dangerously radioactive for many thousands of years. Currently, there are thousands of metric tons of used solid fuel from nuclear power plants worldwide and millions of liters of radioactive liquid waste from weapons production sitting in temporary storage containers.

Thankfully, the world has just come closer to finding a permanent solution to its nuclear menace: scientists in the U.S. Department of Energy’s Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (Jefferson Lab) are currently developing an Accelerator-Driven Systems (ADS) designed to transmute long-lived nuclear waste into shorter-lived isotopes, potentially cutting the required storage time for nuclear waste by 99.7%.

The Jefferson Lab particle accelerator employs high-energy proton beams to strike a heavy metal target (like liquid mercury), triggering spallation to create neutrons. These neutrons then bombard the nuclear waste (minor actinides and long-lived fission products), "burning" them up and converting them into more stable or shorter-lived elements. The fission reactions triggered by this process generate heat, which can be converted into carbon-free electricityThis process can reduce the required isolation time for nuclear waste from approximately 100,000 years to just 300 years.

The Jefferson Lab project is funded the $8.17 million NEWTON (Nuclear Energy Waste Transmutation Optimized Now) program aimed at developing highly efficient, superconducting radio frequency (SRF) cavities, specifically designing niobium-tin cavities for these high-power proton linear accelerators. Traditional particle accelerators rely on expensive cryogenic cooling systems to reach superconducting temperatures.

Jefferson Lab is advancing a cost-effective particle accelerator technology by coating pure niobium cavities with a thin layer of tin, forming a Niobium-Tin high-performance intermetallic compound superconductor that can be used to generate powerful magnetic fields. This innovation allows cavities to achieve superconducting states at a higher temperature of 18 Kelvin.

That said, the Jefferson Lab project is still in the research and optimization phase. Back in 2024, Finland unveiled Onkalo, the world's first permanent deep-geological repository for high-level nuclear waste. Located on Olkiluoto Island and situated over 400 meters deep in stable bedrock, Onkalo uses multi-barrier KBS-3 systems that isolates spent fuel for 100,000 years. The KBS-3 method involves placing spent fuel into copper canisters, which are then placed in tunnels, surrounded by bentonite clay, and sealed in bedrock to prevent radiation leaks. The project, operated by Posiva, has been in development for over 25 years. Onkalo is considered a major breakthrough in nuclear energy sustainability.

But Finland is not alone. Last October, Sweden commenced construction of a deep-earth nuclear waste repository similar to Finland's' Onkalo. About a dozen European countries are also planning deep geological repositories for their nuclear waste. Here in the U.S., government officials have proposed storing the country’s nuclear waste in a repository beneath Yucca Mountain in Nevada about 300 m below ground level and 300 m above the water table. However, this idea has gone in and out of favor with changes in the presidency. For now, nuclear waste simply accumulates mainly where it’s generated--at the power plants and processing facilities, with some having been sitting in interim storage since the 1940s. In Hanford alone, more than 200 million liters of radioactive liquid waste--a mix of liquid, sediment, and sludge--has been sitting in tanks waiting to be processed. Obviously,  storing this kind of high-level liquid waste indefinitely is hardly sustainable.

The challenge of safely handling nuclear waste is likely to remain at the forefront of the global energy sector even as nuclear energy enjoys a renaissance. Global nuclear capacity is projected to more than double to over 1,000 GW(e) by 2050, driven by decarbonization goals, surging electricity demand primarily from AI data centers and the pursuit of energy security. Half of all global capacity expansion to 2050 is expected to come from China, with its nuclear fleet on track to overtake the U.S. as the world’s largest by 2030. China is building over 30 new reactors, representing nearly one-third of the world’s ongoing nuclear plant construction. China is investing heavily in both large-scale Gen III/IV reactors and small modular reactors (SMRS), aiming for rapid modernization. But China is not alone: roughly 50 countries including Egypt, Bangladesh and Turkey are now exploring or planning nuclear programs, which could add ~160 GWe by 2050.

By Alex Kimani for Oilprice.com


World Nuclear News


Environmental approval for Saskatchewan uranium project


Australia-headquartered Paladin Energy Limited has received approval from the Government of Saskatchewan for its Environmental Impact Statement for development of its Patterson Lake South project, located in the Athabasca Basin, Canada.
 
Patterson Lake South (Image: Paladin)

The Saskatchewan Minister of Environment formally approved the company's Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the shallow, high grade Patterson Lake South (PLS) project on 18 February. The approval follows technical acceptance of the document in June 2025 and an extensive public review period from July to September last year.

Paladin is proposing to construct, operate and decommission underground and surface facilities to support the mining and processing of uranium ore at the PLS project, which it acquired in 2024 through its acquisition of Canadian uranium project developer Fission Uranium Corporation. The main components include an underground mine, an onsite mill to process an average of 1,000 tonnes of ore per day, surface facilities to support the short- and long-term storage of waste rock and ore, an underground tailings management facility, water-handling infrastructure and an effluent treatment circuit, and additional infrastructure to support mining activities.

"The Environmental Assessment approval is an important regulatory milestone for the PLS Project and a prerequisite for permits and licences issued by provincial and federal authorities leading to construction and operation," Paladin said.

The company said it continues to work closely with the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) to progress the project within its licensing process at the federal level. Paladin is advancing the technical detail needed to support the application for a construction licence submitted to the CNSC by Fission Uranium Corporation in April 2023.

"The Patterson Lake South Project supports the province's Growth Plan and Saskatchewan's role as an energy supplier," added Minister of Environment Darlene Rowden. "I am pleased to see this project moving forward with strong environmental safeguards. The environmental and sustainability aspects of the PLS Project have been subject to our robust Environmental Assessment process including scrutiny of our review panel of subject matter experts and having undergone considerable public and indigenous consultation. I commend Paladin on its approach to the approval process and congratulate their team on achieving this important milestone in their development."

Paladin Managing Director and CEO Paul Hemburrow said: "Paladin is delighted that the Minister, the Saskatchewan Government and its environmental regulatory agency have formally recognised that our approach to delivering a sustainable and safe development at the PLS Project is both environmentally and socially appropriate and achievable. The PLS Project is an economically and strategically important development within Canada and we will continue to progress the construction licencing process with the CNSC."

PLS is on the southwest margin of the Athabasca Basin and incorporates the Triple R deposit, which is both high grade and shallow - mineralisation starts just 50 metres below the surface. The deposit has indicated mineral resources of 114.9 million pounds U3O8 (44,196 tU) at an average grade of 1.94% U3O8, inferred resources of 15.4 million pounds at an average grade of 1.10% and probable reserves of 93.7 million pounds at an average 1.41% U3O8, all reported at a cut-off grade of 0.25%.

In 2023, Fission Uranium Corporation filed an NI 43-101 technical report summarising the feasibility study for the project, including a construction timeline of 3 years with an estimated initial capital cost of CAD1.155 billion (USD840 million) for a ten-year life-of-mine with total production of 90.9 million lbs U3O8 (35,000 tU), and an average unit operating cost of CAD13.02 per pound U3O8.

Contract signed for generic Polish BWRX-300 design

GE Vernova Hitachi Nuclear Energy and Orlen Synthos Green Energy have signed an agreement to develop a detailed technical design of the BWRX-300 small modular reactor adapted to Polish regulations, safety standards and environmental conditions.
 
(Image: OSGE)

The Poland Generic Design Agreement was signed during a ceremony on Tuesday at the US Department of Energy in Washington DC. Participants included US Deputy Secretary of Energy James Danly, Poland's Minister of Energy Miłosz Motyka, Poland's Government Plenipotentiary for Strategic Energy Infrastructure and Deputy of Minister of Energy Wojciech Wrochna, as well as representatives from GE Vernova Hitachi Nuclear Energy (GVH), Orlen Synthos Green Energy (OSGE) and Synthos Green Energy (SGE).

Following the signing of the contract, OSGE will invest in the development of a detailed BWRX-300 design that will serve as a reference design for SMR projects in Poland.

Poland's Ministry of Energy said the agreement guarantees "faster investment preparation, lower costs, and the integration of Polish industry into the supply chain", adding that the agreement "constitutes a formal step towards building a Polish fleet of SMR reactors". It said: "The so-called generic design will be a common, standard documentation for all future power plants of this type in the country. This will eliminate the need to create complete documentation from scratch for subsequent investments, and changes will be limited to elements specific to a given location."

"Poland has the potential to become a European leader in small modular reactor (SMR) technology," said Polish Minister of Energy Miłosz Motyka. "A further decisive step toward that objective has just been taken. To ensure a stable, zero-emission power system and predictable market conditions for industry, we are advancing in parallel both large-scale nuclear power plants and small modular reactor technology. SMRs provide critical baseload support for energy-intensive industries, contribute to price stability for end-users, and represent a powerful growth stimulus for the Polish nuclear supply chain. In the context of steadily increasing electricity demand, the deployment of both technologies is essential."

"This is a decision of strategic importance for Poland's energy transition," Polish Secretary of State at the Ministry of Energy Wojciech Wrochna said. "The generic design constitutes the cornerstone for building a standardised reactor fleet under a repeatable deployment model. Standardisation translates into lower unit capital expenditures and enhanced cost competitiveness. It also creates a significant opportunity to strengthen domestic industrial capabilities and to secure meaningful participation of Polish companies in the execution of advanced nuclear technology projects."

"This investment by OSGE is a gamechanger for the future of nuclear energy in Poland," said GVH CEO Jason Cooper. "Advancing the generic design of the BWRX-300 to accelerate its deployment in Poland is another example of what can be achieved with shared vision and investment."

Rafał Kasprów, CEO of OSGE, added: "The agreement concluded today provides for the design of a nuclear power plant in accordance with Polish regulations. It will be applicable to the deployment of a fleet of BWRX-300 reactors across multiple locations in Poland. This project approach, which forms a core element of OSGE's strategy, will enable significant cost reductions through design standardisation and the development of a robust supply chain. As a result, it will lower the cost of electricity for the Polish power system and, ultimately, for end consumers."

In December 2021 GE Hitachi, BWXT Canada and SGE - part of the Synthos Group - signed a Letter of Intent to cooperate in deploying BWRX-300 SMRs in Poland. OSGE - a joint venture between chemical producers SGE and PKN Orlen - plans to deploy a fleet of 24 BWRX-300 reactors in Poland. It has begun development at three separate sites and aims to complete the first unit, in Włocławek, by 2032.

The Ministry of Energy said it is finalising work on a roadmap for SMRs, which is intended to streamline the investment process and identify good practices for potential investors.

The BWRX-300 is a 300 MWe water-cooled, natural circulation SMR with passive safety systems that leverages the design and licensing basis of GEVH's US Nuclear Regulatory Commission-certified ESBWR boiling water reactor design and its existing, licensed GNF2 fuel design. GVH's first BWRX-300 is under construction at Ontario Power Generation's Darlington site in Canada, with completion expected by the end of the decade

Partners discuss licensing for Brazil's phosphate-uranium project

The Santa Quitéria Project is expected to produce about 2,300 tonnes of uranium concentrate per year, as part of Brazil's plan to become self-sufficient in nuclear fuel production.
 
The uranium phosphate deposit located in Itataia (Image: INB)

Tomás Albuquerque, President of Indústrias Nucleares do Brasil (INB), met with the Governor of Ceará, Elmano de Freitas, as well as Marlos Costa, President of Brazilian Nuclear Energy Holdings Company (ENBPar), Marcelo Oliveira, the CEO of INB's project partner the fertiliser specialists Galvani, and others, including the regional coordinator of the INB Santa Quitéria Project, José Roberto de Alcântara.

The meeting was focused on "aligning the licensing process for phosphate and uranium exploration in the state, as well as discussing strategic investments in infrastructure", INB said.

The project is to be implemented at Fazenda Itataia, in the municipality of Santa Quitéria. The collophanite deposit at Itataia is composed of 99.8% phosphate and 0.2% uranium. The deposit - located in the interior of the state of Ceará - is the largest discovered uranium reserve in Brazil.

INB says the projected annual production is approximately 1.05 million tonnes of phosphate fertiliser and 220,000 tonnes of dicalcium phosphate for animal feed: "Furthermore, the project is expected to produce approximately 2,300 tonnes of uranium concentrate per year, destined to supply the Angra 1, Angra 2, and, in the future, Angra 3 nuclear power plants. This initiative reinforces the country's strategy of self-sufficiency in nuclear fuel production, with potential for export."

The Santa Quitéria Project is currently in the preliminary environmental licensing process with the Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA) - it was accepted for environmental review in March 2022.

Background

According to World Nuclear Association, following active exploration in the 1970s and 1980s, Brazil has reasonably assured resources of 210,000 tonnes of uranium.

Uranium has been mined in Brazil since 1982, but the only operating mine is INB's Lagoa Real/Caetité mine, with a capacity of 340 tU per year. The mine has known resources of 10,000 tU at 0.3%U.

According to figures reported at the time plans for an extraction plant were announced in 2020 the Itatiaia deposit has an estimated 142,200 tU, inter-mixed with phosphates. The deposit has exploitable reserves of 79.5 million tonnes of ore, at grades of 11% P2O5 and 0.0998% U3O8, equating to about 8.9 million tonnes of P2O5 and 79.3 thousand tonnes of U3O8. The project would increase Brazil's production of phosphate fertilisers by an estimated 10%.

Brazil has a long-established nuclear energy sector. Two pressurised water reactors - Angra 1 and 2 - supply about 3% of the country's electricity. There are also plans to complete a third unit at Angra and potential new capacity is being explored, including via a microreactor being developed in the country.

Orano submits environmental report for Project IKE


Orano has submitted its Environmental Report to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission for Project IKE, a gas centrifuge uranium enrichment facility planned for Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
 
A rendering of Orano's planned Project IKE facility (Image: Orano)

The Environmental Report (ER) provides an in-depth assessment of potential environmental impacts and demonstrates Orano's commitment to environmental protection, public health and safety, transparency, and regulatory compliance.

"The submission represents a major licensing milestone and reflects more than a year of comprehensive environmental analysis, technical evaluation, and interagency coordination," Orano said. "With the ER submitted, the project advances to the next phase of NRC review and is on track for complete facility licence submission to the NRC later this year."

"With 50 years of safe commercial uranium enrichment operations, including 15 years with gas centrifuges, we have a clear understanding for evaluating our Project IKE development," said Orano USA CEO Jean-Luc Palayer. "We are pleased to reach this early review stage with the NRC and to submit a detailed and comprehensive Environmental Report addressing the required analyses, including land use, air quality, water quality and use, public and occupational health, and socioeconomics."

In September 2024, together with the State of Tennessee, Orano announced the selection of Oak Ridge as its preferred site to construct a multi-billion-dollar centrifuge uranium enrichment facility called Project IKE. The selected Project IKE site is in Roane County near Oak Ridge, Tennessee, on greenfield property owned by the US Department of Energy (DOE).

In early January, Orano was selected by the DOE to receive USD900 million of funding to build an enriched uranium production facility in the USA. The total cost of the project is estimated at nearly USD5 billion. At that time, Orano said it was now "able to address the next steps of the project, in particular, a finalisation of the contract and the filing of a licence application with the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission in HY1 of 2026".

Orano noted that the licensing process can last up to three years, though new NRC efficiencies may shorten that duration.

Production of low-enriched uranium at the new facility is scheduled to begin in 2031.

Philippines streamlines licensing for nuclear projects


The Philippine government has completed a "harmonised, whole-of-government licensing and permitting flowchart" for nuclear power plant projects, a key step toward enabling the safe and efficient operation of nuclear power facilities by 2032.
 
(Image: Philippines DOE)

The Department of Energy (DOE) said the streamlined end-to-end licensing framework was formulated during a Focus Group Discussion on Harmonising Nuclear Power Plant Licensing in the Philippines held on 11 February in Bonifacio Global City. Led by Energy Undersecretary Rowena Cristina Guevara, Finance Undersecretary Catherine Fong and Philippine Nuclear Research Institute Director Carlo Arcilla, the discussion gathered more than 100 stakeholders from the private sector, academia and 24 government agencies under the Nuclear Energy Programme Inter-Agency Committee (NEP-IAC).

The regulatory pathway spans seven major phases requiring sequential and parallel approvals. These include: business registration and foundational permits; environmental clearances and nuclear siting requirements; licensing by the Philippine Atomic Energy Regulatory Authority (PhilAtom) to construct or secure a provisional permit; energy sector-specific approvals and licenses; operational and support registrations and permits; construction monitoring and oversight; and licensing for operation, testing and commissioning.

The DOE said the government hopes to present the NEP-IAC-validated flowchart to prospective nuclear power project proponents who wish to invest in the Philippines, alongside relevant policies and investment incentives.

In response to the 1973 oil crisis, the Philippines decided to build the two-unit Bataan plant. Construction of Bataan 1 - a 621 MWe Westinghouse pressurised water reactor - began in 1976 and it was completed in 1984 at a cost of USD460 million. However, due to financial issues and safety concerns related to earthquakes, the plant was never loaded with fuel or operated. The plant has since been maintained. There have been several proposals over the years to either start up the plant or convert it to a gas-fired plant.

In March 2022, then President Rodrigo Duterte signed an executive order that outlined the government's position for the inclusion of nuclear energy in the Philippines' energy mix, taking into account economic, political, social and environmental objectives. The country aims to have its first nuclear power plants operational by 2032, with an initial capacity of 1,200 MW, expanding to 2,400 MW by 2035 and reaching 4,800 MW by 2050.

"By finalising this harmonised licensing roadmap, we are sending a clear signal that the Philippines is preparing for nuclear energy with discipline and foresight," said Energy Secretary Sharon Garin. "Our commitment is straightforward: strong safety oversight, predictable processes, and transparent public engagement, so that when proponents are ready to invest, government is ready to evaluate, regulate, and deliver our 2032 target responsibly."

Russian uranium mining hit targets in 2025, expansion planned

Rosatom has reported that uranium mining companies achieved their production plans in 2025 and are expanding their mineral resource base.
 
(Image: Rosatom)

In a report of the annual meeting of Rosatom’s mining division Rosatom Nedra with stakeholders, it noted that licences have been obtained for the development of the Shirondukuyskoye deposit in eastern Siberia, and the Tetrakhskoye deposit, in the Republic of Buryatia.

In addition, it said, JSC Khiagda was constructing new production infrastructure to develop the Namarusskoye and Dybrynskoye deposits and that the first uranium was produced at the JSC Dalur Dobrovolnoye deposit in the Kurgan Region.

Viktor Svyatetsky, First Deputy Director General and Executive Director of Rosatom Nedra, said: "Our key objective is to expand our uranium mineral resource base to meet the needs of the Russian nuclear energy industry … in 2026, we will complete the bulk of capital mining work at the Shirondukuyskoye deposit, with the aim of further extracting about 400 tonnes of uranium from it, beginning in 2028. There are plans to bring the Elkon project out of hibernation. This uranium deposit currently holds the largest reserves in Russia."

A project to modernise the Krasnokamensk Thermal Power Plant has been taking place with a goal of increasing electricity generation by 60 MW to help the development of uranium projects and ensure a stable supply of electricity and heat to Priargunsky Industrial Mining and Chemical Union's flagship uranium mining enterprise and the city of Krasnokamensk.

Oleg Kazanov, director of the Federal Agency for Subsoil Use (Rosnedra), said: "The rapid growth of uranium consumption in Russia and globally requires a new approach to ensuring our country's raw material supply. Over the next 7-10 years, we will need to increase the volume of economically viable uranium reserves within the three existing mining centres, and over the next 15-20 years, we will need to create new mining centres."

The meeting also heard that non-uranium businesses now account for 37.5% of revenue, helped by commercial production beginning at the Severnoye gold deposit in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), where 1.5 tonnes of gold have been mined. Further geological exploration work has been taking place, as well as various projects being developed related to rare earths.

Contract for Sellafield plutonium storage containers

UK pressure vessel manufacturer LTi Metaltech Ltd has been awarded a contract worth more than GBP45 million (USD60 million) by Sellafield Ltd to manufacture and supply containers for use in Sellafield's Product and Residue Store Retreatment Plant.
 
A rendering of the completed SRP (Image: Proicere Digital)

In January last year, the UK government took the decision that the country's stockpile of civil plutonium would be disposed of, rather than used to produce mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel for nuclear power plants. The inventory arose from the reprocessing of used nuclear fuel undertaken over many decades. The UK's stockpile of some 140 tonnes of civil plutonium is currently stored at the Sellafield site in Cumbria, in line with regulatory requirements.

Once commissioned, the Sellafield Product and Residue Store Retreatment Plant (SRP) will prepare plutonium for long‑term storage ahead of its future immobilisation. The plant will treat existing plutonium stocks and repackage them into durable, modern containers known as 100‑year cans. That will ensure the material is capable of being transferred to an immobilisation facility where it will be converted into a stable waste form, suitable for consignment to a geological disposal facility.

Under the contract, LTi Metaltech - part of the wider LTi Group - will deliver products designed to support the re-packaging of special nuclear materials to nuclear quality requirements, with rigorous inspection and full material traceability embedded throughout manufacture. The team will work closely with Sellafield and project stakeholders throughout mobilisation and delivery to ensure all items meet technical, regulatory and schedule expectations.

Across the contract term, SRP will require multiple product types, with projected demand ranging from approximately 4,500 to 9,500 units, depending on product category. Delivery will be split into two phases: an initial three to four year development phase, followed by a 10-year volume production phase aligned to programme needs.

"Sellafield has safely and securely managed plutonium since the 1940s, developing world leading expertise in the process and being recognised as the UK's centre of excellence for plutonium management," said James Riddick, Sellafield Ltd chief supply chain officer. "It's a mission of national significance and requires expertise across a vast supply chain. LTi Metaltech is now part of this mission and was selected for its robust high-integrity manufacturing approach, specialist capability, and a delivery model aimed at consistent, repeatable supply over the life of the contract."

LTi Metaltech Managing Director Edgar Rayner added: "We're proud to support Sellafield's mission, and the contract award reflects our ethos of 'making stuff that matters', delivering high-integrity products for projects where safety and reliability are critical. This contract is an important milestone for LTi Metaltech and a strong endorsement of our manufacturing capability."

SRP is one of the largest and most complex projects under way at Sellafield. It is being delivered through Sellafield's Programme and Project Partners (PPP) model, which brings together KBR, Amentum, Morgan Sindall Infrastructure and Altrad Babcock, supported by a wider supply chain.

The main construction of 30-metre-tall SRP began in February 2020 with the first concrete pour for the base slab. The facility is set to be ready for active commissioning in 2027 and is expected to remain in operation until about 2060.

THE GRIFT

Why Central Asia Matters on Trump’s “Board of Peace”

  • Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan joined Trump’s Board of Peace to contribute diplomatic credibility and regional mediation experience.

  • Uzbekistan brings reform-driven diplomacy and credibility among non-aligned states.

  • Kazakhstan contributes multivector diplomatic expertise and economic insight.

The presidents of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan attended the inaugural meeting of US President Donald Trump’s Board of Peace in Washington, DC on 19 February 2026. The Board has been promoted as the tool to rebuild the Gaza Strip, so why were two Central Asian republics in attendance?

In an era when global institutions are strained, and geopolitical competition is intensifying,  Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan have emerged as unlikely but valuable contributors to the US President Donald Trump’s signature project now that the Abraham Accords have been sidelined by Israel’s attack on the Gaza Strip. Their participation reflects not only regional aspirations but also a quiet diplomatic maturity that often goes unnoticed in Washington, which, since the 9/11 attacks, appears to have forgotten how to listen. If the project is to amount to more than branding, it will be due in no small part to the disciplined, pragmatic engagement of Central Asia—especially Uzbekistan.

Uzbekistan’s contribution stands out because of the transformation the country has undergone since its independence in 1991. Its leadership has pursued a foreign policy rooted in de-escalation, regional cooperation, and sovereign independence—principles that align directly with any peace-focused initiative seeking real results rather than symbolic gestures. For years, Central Asia was framed as a zone of rivalry among great powers. Today, Uzbekistan has rebranded it as a zone of dialogue, proving that geography need not be destiny.

Nowhere is this more evident than in Tashkent’s persistent push for intra-regional cooperation. The country has been instrumental in reducing historical tensions within Central Asia, promoting new economic links, and mediating disputes that previously had no neutral sponsor. For Trump’s Board, which positions itself as a venue for unconventional diplomacy and as an alternative to the United Nations, Uzbekistan offers not only rhetorical support but a tested model of conflict de-risking. Its experience facilitating cross-border water agreementsgreen energy cooperation, and transport connectivity, and resolving border disputes, provides a governance template that can be applied to troubled regions far beyond Central Asia.

Uzbekistan also brings something Washington often undervalues and currently lacks: credibility among non-aligned states. In a world where U.S. initiatives often face well-earned skepticism, Uzbekistan can act as a balancing voice—supportive of stability but independent enough to be trusted by governments unwilling to be seen as extensions of American policy. This allows the Board to widen its diplomatic reach without triggering the backlash that often accompanies overt Western mediation. In short, Uzbekistan helps make the Board’s outreach more usable.

Moreover, Tashkent’s domestic reforms strengthen its standing as a partner in peace-related initiatives. Economic liberalization, anti-corruption initiatives, and cautious political opening have given the country a reformist image, and with that comes a measure of soft power. By participating in the Board, Uzbekistan signals that peace is inseparable from development and that states seeking stability must also deliver opportunity to their citizens. It’s a message that resonates far more strongly when spoken by a country that began its reforms from a tough baseline and continues to manage them without external templates.

Kazakhstan’s role is also significant and complementary. Where Uzbekistan brings regional mediation experience and reform credibility, Kazakhstan contributes institutional know-how rooted in decades of multivector diplomacy. Astana has long positioned itself as a venue for dialogue, hosting Syria peace talksnuclear non-proliferation discussions, and Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) initiatives. Its diplomatic corps is seasoned and technically adept, and comfortable navigating between rival powers. For Trump’s Board, this means access to a well-developed infrastructure of negotiators, analysts, and conflict-resolution specialists.

Kazakhstan also offers a macroeconomic perspective. As a major energy exporter and key actor in Eurasian logistics, it brings to the Board an understanding of how disputes over transit, pipelines, and trade corridors can escalate or be managed. A peace initiative ignoring the economic dimension is rarely successful; Kazakhstan ensures that the Board keeps the interplay between security and commerce front and center.

Yet, despite Kazakhstan’s importance, the driving energy may ultimately come from Tashkent. Uzbekistan sits at the geographic and psychological heart of Central Asia. Its population, cultural weight, and renewed outward posture allow it to mobilize regional cooperation in ways that no external actor can. When Uzbekistan leans into diplomacy, its neighbors tend to follow—an effect the Board can leverage to build multiparty coalitions for conflict reduction. And, the day before the Board convened, Trump and Uzbekistan’s president, Shavkat Mirziyoyev, signed an agreement to give the US greater access to Uzbekistan’s critical minerals.

Central Asia’s growing strategic relevance also amplifies the value of both countries. As global trade routes shift, energy markets evolve, and competition between major powers intensifies, stable intermediaries become indispensable. A peace forum that includes Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan gains access to a corridor connecting South Asia, China, Russia, and the Middle East. Their insights into cross-border infrastructure, sanctions navigation, and regional security architectures are not theoretical—they are lived experience.

Critics may argue that Trump’s Board of Peace is more showpiece than institution, but that critique loses force when substantial contributors bring their own agendas of stability, development, and connectivity. Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan do not join such initiatives casually and will not sacrifice their credibility if the Board becomes an adjunct of the US State Department. Their participation is itself a signal that a platform has the potential to be more than a political ornament.

Ultimately, the success of the Board depends on whether it can integrate practical regional experience rather than relying solely on Washington’s worldview. (And Trump’s personal challenge will be to consider the Central Asian leaders’ views if they conflict with advice from his unofficial envoys or family members.) Here, Uzbekistan’s role is indispensable. A peace initiative that ignores frontline experience tends toward abstraction; one that incorporates Uzbekistan’s grounded, regionally tested diplomacy gains operational depth. As global politics enters a more fragmented and multipolar stage, such depth is not optional—it is essential.

By elevating Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan within the Board of Peace, Trump’s initiative does more than expand its membership. It taps into a reservoir of pragmatic diplomacy that has already been proven in one of the world’s most complex neighborhoods. If peace is to be more than a slogan, Central Asia—led by Uzbekistan’s increasingly confident voice—may be the partner the Board most needs.

By James Durso for Oilprice.com

U.S. Energy Dominance Push Collides with EU Methane Rules

  • U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright urged the IEA to refocus on energy security over climate goals, as Washington pushes to expand oil and LNG exports.

  • Europe’s methane and sustainability regulations threaten U.S. LNG trade, with exporters warning that strict emissions reporting rules could act as trade barriers.

  • The EU faces a growing dilemma between net-zero ambitions and energy security, as rising LNG dependence and industrial strain increase pressure to ease climate regulations.

Last week, U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright called on the International Energy Agency to stop fixating on climate change and instead return to its original focus on energy security. The call came in the context of plans by the U.S. federal government to significantly increase the amount of oil and gas the country exports—plans for energy dominance. Europe is the top destination for these plans, and it may have to ditch its net-zero plans as well if it wants energy security.

“We’ve gotten off track on energy ... it has gotten so ridiculously out of whack that it has driven deindustrialisation and made our countries geopolitically weaker,” Secretary Wright said during the IEA’s ministerial meeting last week. He also said that the IEA’s scenarios for the energy system of the future were unrealistic—something the U.S. has said before, prompting the IEA to bring back its Current Policies Scenario. The organization had previously abandoned that scenario—which reflects physical reality—in favor of the Net-Zero Scenario and the Stated Policies Scenario, all of which predict a significant and steep decline in the demand for hydrocarbons.

This decline, however, has yet to materialize, including in top net-zero investing nations such as China, the UK, Germany, and other European countries that have prioritized emission reduction over economic growth. The European Union’s imports of liquefied natural gas specifically, are running at a record, and this record is about to be broken this year yet again. With the EU’s gas in stock at just 30%, demand for replenishment would be greater than in the last four years—and most of that gas will come from the United States. But there is a problem.

In line with its focus on emission reduction, the European Union two years ago adopted a methane regulation aimed at reducing not only the EU’s own emissions of the greenhouse gas but also forcing countries outside the EU that do business with the bloc to cut their emissions as well. The regulation, starting this year, extends to all energy suppliers to the EU—and these suppliers are the opposite of happy about it.

The United States emerged as the biggest supplier of liquefied gas to the EU after 2022. Indeed, to secure the energy dominance from his agenda, President Trump negotiated a trade deal with the EU’s Ursula von der Leyen that involved a commitment to buy $750 billion worth of U.S. energy commodities over three years. But that cannot happen with the methane directive, which imposes expensive methane emission tracking, monitoring, verifying, and reporting obligations on energy exporters to the EU.

Qatar, which is the second-largest LNG supplier to the EU, complained about the direction several times, ultimately spelling it out: if the EU is so concerned about methane emissions, they should look for some other source of LNG because Qatar would stop selling to the bloc. The U.S. also warned the regulation was unwelcome, with Secretary Wright saying it was impossible to implement and describing it as “a critical non-tariff trade barrier that imposes an undue burden on U.S. exporters and our trade relationship.” The U.S. demanded an exemption from the regulation until 2035, but the EU’s energy commissioner took a tough stance, saying the regulation will remain in place for all—at least for the time being. Because energy security does matter more than net-zero plans.

The European Union’s appetite for liquefied natural gas soared sharply after the decimation of the Russian pipeline supply. Despite all the net-zero plans of all the European governments, industries, and households still needed reliable energy—even as it became increasingly expensive, causing that deindustrialization that Secretary Wright has noted repeatedly as an unwelcome outcome of energy transition efforts. The cost of energy is already causing certain stirrings in political circles in Europe, with signals emerging that decision-makers may yield to pressure to bring costs down by lightening the emission regulation load—and helping the United States advance its energy dominance agenda.

In addition to the methane directive, the EU central government would have to scrap two other directives as well if it wants to continue buying U.S. liquefied gas and crude oil. The corporate sustainability due diligence directive, or CCDDD, and the corporate sustainability reporting directive, or CSRD, both put a myriad of reporting requirements on companies from outside the EU, spanning issues from human rights abuse to, once again, emissions. The financial burden that these additional requirements would place on companies would not be met with any enthusiasm.

Ultimately, it would be a choice between net zero and economic survival for the EU. The two have proven time and again to be not simply incompatible but at odds with each other, as noted by various U.S. officials and evidenced by growth trends in the U.S. and top European economies such as Germany and the UK. America’s top gas client would have to decide whether it wants to have functioning economies or net zero emissions, and America itself seems eager to force it to make the right decision.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

 

Renewables Top 25% of U.S. Power as Coal’s Grip Collapses

In 2025, the share of renewables in U.S. electricity generation has surpassed 25 percent.

Over the course of the past 20 years, their share has continuously risen from just 8.6 percent in 2007.

At the same time, as Statista's Kathraina Buchholz details in the infographic below, coal in electricity generation fell from a share of 49 percent to just 16.4 percent last year.

Infographic: Renewables Now Make up 1/4 of U.S. Electricity Generation | Statista

You will find more infographics at Statista

While Trump administration's policies regarding renewable energy and greenhouse gases have yet to show their full effect, experts believe that the sector's strong growth as well as efficiency and cost improvements will cause it to expand further – albeit slower – despite some government funding losses and the end of emission limits.

In 2022, more electricity was generated from renewable sources in the U.S. for the first time over the course of one year than from coal.

That year, renewable energy sources created more than 900 terawatt-hours of electric power in the country compared to a little over 800 that came from coal.

On a global scale, this change happened last year as renewables outweighed coal electricity generation in the second half of 2025.

Up until 2007, coal accounted for more than 2,000 terawatt hours of electricity in the U.S. before the figure started to declined as regulations around fossil fuels - limits on carbon-intensity and the emissions of toxic elements like mercury - tightened. Electricity generation from natural gas gained pace as a result since it produces somewhat less CO2. To reach the emission goals associated with the net zero age, however, the U.S. would have to continue growing carbon-neutral electricity sources like wind and solar, which have been on a steady upwards climb in the new millennium and are now the second biggest source of electric power in the country.

Looking not only at electricity but energy use as a whole, renewables have a longer way to go in the U.S. and globally.

Here, renewable energy made up only 9 percent in 2023 as energy sources outside of electricity - most notably petroleum in the form of gasoline - are added to the mix.

By Zerohedge.com

Clean Energy Markets Face a Volatile Year Despite Record Global Investment

  • Global renewable energy investment reached a record high in 2025, primarily driven by growth in offshore wind and small-scale solar, especially in developing markets.

  • The United States experienced its biggest quarterly drop in clean energy investing in nearly a decade, largely due to the end of a Biden-era EV tax credit that led to $65 billion in EV sector write-offs.

  • A market correction is anticipated for 2026, with a potential resurgence in private equity dealmaking, fueled in part by increasing power demand from artificial-intelligence data centers.

It’s been a volatile year for clean energy markets. Despite major policy shifts impacting green industries, global renewable energy investment hit a record high in 2025. A closer look at last year’s figures reveals a high level of ambivalence in the marketplace, with a sharp drop in clean energy investments in the United States in the last corner, but a surprising resurgence of clean energy dealmaking over the same time frame.

The electric vehicles sector, in particular, is already showing signs of sharp contraction after the Trump administration ended a Biden-era EV tax credit last fall. Globally, EV manufacturers have registered a combined $65 billion in write-offs since the $7,500 U.S. federal tax credit was rolled back in September, with major automakers like Ford and Stellantis reporting hefty losses and EV program cancellations. In the United States, the drop in electric vehicle sales was the primary driver of the biggest quarterly drop in clean energy investing that the country has seen in almost a decade. 

While clean energy investing was strong overall in 2025 in the United States, reaching a record annual high of $277 billion, the numbers for the fourth quarter are grim. A reported $8 billion in clean energy projects were scrapped, and just $3 billion worth of new projects announced. “That means the pipeline of new investment is shrinking,” Hannah Hess, associate director of climate and energy for the Rhodium group, recently told nonpartisan news outlet Semafor. “Usually, even when we see quarterly fluctuations, from a zoomed-out view we continue to see sustained momentum. That’s no longer true.”

And the EV investing and clean energy investing drop is likely to continue as the Trump administration ramps up its climate policy rollbacks. Earlier this month, the administration delivered “one of the single largest deregulatory actions in U.S. history” when it ended the 2009 law classifying carbon dioxide as a threat to public health, kneecapping regulators’ ability to set emissions caps.

However, Bloomberg reports that there are signs of a coming resurgence in private equity dealmaking in the clean energy sector after a year characterized by extreme policy uncertainty. Last year saw a plummet in clean energy acquisitions, with a more-than 50 percent year-on-year contraction. In fact, numbers dipped down to 2013 levels, effectively erasing over a decade of growth. 

But there are several reasons that we can expect a market correction in 2026. “Power demand from artificial-intelligence data centers continues to boost investment in renewables, with US data-center electricity consumption projected to triple by 2035 from 2024 levels,” Bloomberg reports. “At the same time, last year’s slowdown has forced developers and asset owners to reassess valuations.” While dealmaking is on the rise, the sector has a whole lot of ground to recover.

While clean energy investing in the United States fell 36 percent from the second half of 2024 in response to the rapidly shifting policy landscape, global numbers are looking stronger than ever. Worldwide, investments in creating new renewable energy production capacity reached a record $386 billion in the first half of 2025. This growth was primarily driven by offshore wind and small-scale solar development.

Markets in the developing world are showing huge growth in terms of clean energy deployment and electric vehicle adoption. As it has become an affordable and accessible option, small-scale solar has boomed in resource-constrained economies like Pakistan and much of sub-Saharan Africa.

“Markets with supportive revenue mechanisms have maintained momentum on renewable energy investment,” says Meredith Annex, Head of Clean Power at BloombergNEF. “Whereas projects in markets where revenue certainty is shifting, particularly when it’s down to large swings in policy as in the US or mainland China, are seeing a boom-bust cycle ahead of those changes.”

By Haley Zaremba for Oilprice.com 


First Solar Sees Record 2025 Profit, Guides Steady 2026 Sales


First Solar reported record 2025 earnings and set 2026 guidance projecting up to $5.2 billion in sales, underpinned by U.S. manufacturing expansion and federal production tax credits.

First Solar, Inc. posted net sales of $5.2 billion for 2025, up from $4.2 billion in 2024, as third-party module volumes climbed 24% year-on-year. Fourth-quarter sales reached $1.7 billion, modestly higher than the prior quarter on stronger module shipments.

Net income for the year rose to $1.53 billion, or $14.21 per diluted share, compared with $12.02 per share in 2024. In the fourth quarter alone, the company earned $4.84 per diluted share. Operating income for the year increased to nearly $1.6 billion, while gross profit expanded to $2.12 billion.

The U.S.-headquartered thin-film solar manufacturer ended 2025 with a gross cash balance of $2.9 billion and a net cash position of $2.4 billion, up sharply from $1.5 billion at the end of the third quarter. The increase was driven largely by proceeds from the sale of advanced manufacturing production tax credits under Section 45X of the Inflation Reduction Act framework, as well as operating cash flow, partially offset by capital spending on its Louisiana facility.

Adjusted EBITDA for 2025 came in at $2.36 billion, compared with EBITDA of $2.07 billion, reflecting addbacks for foreign exchange impacts, tax credit monetization discounts, start-up costs, and other items.

Looking ahead, First Solar guided 2026 net sales in a range of $4.9 billion to $5.2 billion, with module volumes between 17.0 GW and 18.2 GW. The company expects adjusted EBITDA of $2.6 billion to $2.8 billion and capital expenditures of $800 million to $1.0 billion. Year-end 2026 net cash is projected between $1.7 billion and $2.3 billion.

Gross margin guidance for 2026 is set at $2.4 billion to $2.6 billion, assuming between $2.10 billion and $2.19 billion in Section 45X tax credits and factoring in underutilization costs and production start-up expenses. First-quarter 2026 adjusted EBITDA is forecast at $400 million to $500 million, supported by anticipated tax credit generation of up to $400 million.

The outlook assumes continuity in the current U.S. policy environment, including trade measures and the implementation of the Inflation Reduction Act as amended in 2025. Management flagged the importance of permitting timelines and the ability to monetize tax credits as key variables.

Strategically, 2025 marked a milestone year with the commissioning of a new Louisiana manufacturing plant and a decision to establish an additional facility in South Carolina, reinforcing First Solar’s positioning as the largest U.S.-based photovoltaic manufacturer. Unlike many global competitors reliant on crystalline silicon supply chains centered in Asia, First Solar produces cadmium telluride thin-film modules through a vertically integrated domestic process.

The results come amid persistent global solar module oversupply and pricing pressure, particularly from Chinese manufacturers, while U.S. trade remedies and domestic content incentives continue to reshape supply chains. First Solar’s emphasis on pricing certainty and long-term contracted volumes has differentiated it in a volatile market environment.

With a strengthened balance sheet, rising earnings, and substantial embedded tax credit support, First Solar enters 2026 with financial flexibility as it continues expanding U.S. manufacturing capacity in a policy landscape still largely supportive of domestic clean energy production.

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com

Lamborghini Scraps Lanzador as EV Supercar Demand Fizzles

  • Major U.S. and European automakers are scaling back EV ambitions as demand weakens, with Lamborghini scrapping its all-electric Lanzador and reaffirming combustion and hybrid models due to limited customer interest.

  • Several legacy carmakers including Ford, GM, Volkswagen, Mercedes, Volvo, Honda, and others have delayed, reduced, or canceled EV investments.

  • The retreat reflects slowing EV adoption and broader policy shifts in the West, as automakers respond to weaker market demand and reassess aggressive electrification timelines.

Big legacy U.S. and European automakers are frantically dialing back their electric vehicle bets, scaling back once-hyped roadmaps to full electrification as demand for these vehicles implodes.

The latest automaker to reverse course is not a mass-market sedan or SUV maker, but a luxury supercar brand: Lamborghini.

CEO Stephan Winkelmann told the UK's The Sunday Times that he has ended plans to build EVs, saying customers are not seeking quiet supercars and that demand has collapsed.

Winkelmann said that EV development risked becoming "an expensive hobby" for the car company. He stated that the previously announced all-electric concept car, Lanzador, will no longer be part of its future lineup of supercars.

He noted that the "acceptance curve" for EVs in Lamborghini's target market was flattening and "close to zero."

Winkelmann said the Lanzador will be replaced by a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. He added that the Italian carmaker will produce internal combustion engines "for as long as possible."

"EVs, in their current form, struggle to deliver this specific emotional connection," Winkelmann explained, pointing out that customers who buy luxury cars seek the sound of a roaring engine.

The slower path toward full electrification, or in some cases partial electrification, is not just a Lamborghini story or limited to the luxury auto market. There has also been a sharp reversal by mass-market automakers over the last six months or so, as they dial back EV ambitions or entirely scrap their electrification plans:

The pivot by Western automakers comes as the West dials back on "climate crisis" policies, which have crushed manufacturing bases from Germany to the U.S. Midwest.

By Zerohedge.com