Monday, June 15, 2026

 

On the trail of the missing hydrogen atoms




Paul Scherrer Institute

Timo Reents and Giovanni Pizzi 

image: 

Timo Reents (left) and Giovanni Pizzi have taught an artificial intelligence system to find missing positions of hydrogen atoms in crystal structures.

view more 

Credit: © Paul Scherrer Institute PSI/Mahir Dzambegovic





Artificial intelligence is often used to generate images. In research, specialised AI models are used for scientific applications – for example, to predict the positions of atoms in materials. The MatterGen model developed by Microsoft can generate complex crystal structures from just a few pieces of information – which atoms should be present and in what proportions – and researchers can then use these structures for computer simulations of new materials.

Now a scientific team led by Giovanni Pizzi from the PSI Center for Scientific Computing, Theory and Data, together with researchers from the universities of Parma and Modena in Italy, has found a way to use AI to solve a practical problem in materials science: locating missing atomic positions in otherwise known structures. As they report in the journal npj Computational Materials, the materials scientists used an approach normally employed in image processing or computer vision, that is, recognition and interpretation of visual information by means of AI.

This allows materials that are experimentally known but have been theoretically inaccessible to be simulated for the first time or significantly better than before. Thus the researchers are contributing to the exploration of new materials with special properties, for hydrogen storage for example, or potentially for the development of new superconductors.

“Invisible” hydrogen atoms

“For our simulations of material properties, we rely on information in databases telling us where each atom is located in a crystal structure,” says Timo Reents, a doctoral candidate in Giovanni Pizzi’s group. However, the element hydrogen presents a challenge. It is often part of the crystal lattice, but it is difficult to detect experimentally using traditional methods that measure the arrangement of atoms through X-ray diffraction. Consequently, the positions of hydrogen atoms in crystal representations are often inaccurate, or they are missing altogether from the visualisations.

Precise knowledge of the atomic positions is essential for computer simulations that researchers use to predict specific material properties, such as electrical or thermal conductivity. “If the information about the hydrogen atoms is missing, that’s a problem,” says Giovanni Pizzi. “Often, we can’t use several thousand potentially interesting materials for our simulations precisely for this reason.” This is where AI should be able to help.

When a paw is missing from a photo of a dog

In computer vision, so-called diffusion models are used. When these are used to fill in missing image information, it is called inpainting. For example, a paw that was hidden in a photo of a dog can be added.

Earlier approaches to computer vision would first add “noise” to the entire image of the dog, intentionally overlaying it with random image information, in order to then reconstruct the photo with all four paws in a second step. Now, however, it is standard practice to vary the strength of the noise depending on the image area: Noise would be added heavily only to the unknown regions where the paw should be.

While this is already established in the field of computer vision, it was previously unavailable for the reconstruction of atomic positions. Now Giovanni Pizzi’s team has developed an adapted open-source model called XtalPaint, based on Microsoft’s MatterGen. “This combines the advantages of modern computer vision and crystal reconstruction: Noise is added only to the unknown positions within the crystal – the known positions remain largely unchanged during the process,” Timo Reents explains.

This offers greater efficiency, just as it does in modern inpainting approaches in computer vision: “With step-by-step reconstruction, XtalPaint can orient itself to the existing crystal from the very beginning,” Reents says. “This increases the success rate and also saves computing power.”

Also applicable to lithium and sodium

To test their method, the researchers removed the hydrogen atom positions from known crystal structures and then used XtalPaint to reconstruct them. In 87 percent of cases, they found the known positions – and in another ten percent, configurations that were even more energetically stable. “Overall, this means a success rate of 97 percent for XtalPaint,” Reents says.

“We can now use our method, for example, to complete structures in databases with the missing hydrogen positions,” says Pizzi. Also, he and his colleagues have already detected errors in databases that can arise through data transfer from original scientific publications. Furthermore, they can apply the method not only to hydrogen atoms, but also for example to lithium and sodium – two elements that are important for the development of new batteries.

Text: Oliver Morsch


missing hydrogen atoms 

In the inpainting method, the artificial intelligence system is trained to preserve a known crystal structure (blue, black, and red spheres) and only insert the missing hydrogen atoms (blurred on the left, white spheres on the right).

Credit

© Paul Scherrer Institute PSI/Giovanni Pizzi


 

About PSI

The Paul Scherrer Institute PSI develops, builds and operates large, complex research facilities and makes them available to the national and international research community. The institute's own key research priorities are in the fields of future technologies, energy and climate, health innovation and fundamentals of nature. PSI is committed to the training of future generations. Therefore about one quarter of our staff are post-docs, post-graduates or apprentices. Altogether PSI employs 2300 people, thus being the largest research institute in Switzerland. The annual budget amounts to approximately CHF 450 million. PSI is part of the ETH Domain, with the other members being the two Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology, ETH Zurich and EPFL Lausanne, as well as Eawag (Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology), Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology) and WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research). 

 

An electron microscope breakthrough delivers sharper images of our body’s tiniest proteins



Physicists introduce phase contrast to electron microscopy, potentially revolutionizing cryo-EM





University of California - Berkeley

Cryo-EM with laser phase plate 

image: 

A laser (purple) is powerfully amplified by highly polished mirrors and focused on the electron beam (blue) to shift its phase and increase the cryo-EM microscope’s contrast, allowing biologists to image smaller proteins and the crowded structures inside cells.

view more 

Credit: Sayo Studio






Nearly 100 years ago, a seemingly simple discovery revolutionized the microscope. The introduction of phase-contrast, which garnered a Nobel Prize in 1953, brought into clear view structures inside cells that had previously been too faint or washed out for biologists to study.

UC Berkeley physicists have now adapted the phase contrast technique to the electron microscope, which has about 10,000 times the magnification of microscopes using optical light.

The addition of a so-called laser phase plate has the potential to greatly improve cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM), a technique for determining the structure of molecules that itself revolutionized the understanding of proteins and accelerated new drug discovery starting a decade ago. Despite its impact, however, cryo-EM still struggles to produce clear images of small molecules — including most human proteins. A laser phase plate promises clear images of most proteins in the cell down to one-third the size of those that are a challenge for today’s machines.

The addition of a laser phase plate seems certain to revolutionize a newer technique referred to as cryoelectron tomography (cryo-ET), which assembles a number of different angular views of a molecule or protein into a 3D image. This makes it possible to analyze proteins in their natural environment — inside cells — instead of in isolation in a solution.

“Cryo-EM has become the new, fastest-growing method for resolving the structure of biological macromolecules, and cryo-ET is expected to show how these molecules work together in their natural, cellular context,” said Holger Müller, a UC Berkeley professor of physics and faculty scientist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory who led the development effort. “But because of signal-to-noise limitations, the majority of human and animal proteins are too small to be analyzed by these methods. The increase in signal-to-noise ratio provided by this laser phase plate is expected to overcome these important limitations.”

Crucial to the development is the world’s most intense, focused continuous-wave laser, which interacts with the electron beam to change its phase. This phase change boosts contrast for small molecules, such as hemoglobin, and for molecules and structures inside cells, such as the nucleus and mitochondria.

“With cryo-ET, we're looking at small, very complicated cellular material that’s incredibly crowded inside the cell,” said Bridget Carragher, founding technical director of imaging at Biohub in Redwood City, California “It’s like a forest of trees, and you’re trying to find one leaf on one tree in there. Cryo-ET needs a dramatic step forward in contrast, so we can start to see what's going on inside the cell. That's what the laser phase plate promises to give us.”

Biohub provided funding to Müller to purchase a state-of-the-art cryo-EM machine that he then outfitted with a laser phase plate, creating a microscope he calls Theia, named after the ancient Greek Titaness of light and radiance. Carragher is overseeing the development of a similar instrument at Biohub’s imaging lab in Redwood City — this one featuring a dual-laser system, based on theoretical work by Müller and his colleagues. In this system, the two perpendicular laser beams operate at about half power, making the components less likely to burn out and reducing aberrations.

Both groups are collaborating with the firm Thermo Fisher Scientific, the primary manufacturer of cryo-EM machines.

“Theia is the Formula 1 microscope,” Müller said. “It has extra electron optics that give it better resolution than the standard cryo-EM, even without the laser. With the addition of the laser phase plate, we hope that it really becomes the world's best instrument overall.”

Müller and his Berkeley team will publish their newest images and details of the cryo-EM’s laser phase plate in the June 11 issue of the journal Science. Biohub’s two-laser system is described in a recently posted preprint.

Biological imaging

Animal and plant cells are mostly water and thus transparent in a light microscope, which should make it easy to see structures such as the nucleus and mitochondria inside. But these structures are small and scatter only a small amount of light, which makes them only slightly darker than the rest of the cell’s insides. This low contrast has typically been improved by staining the cell, though staining also kills the cell.

In 1930, Dutch scientist Frits Zernike realized that the brightness or amplitude of the light was not the only feature affected when passing through a cell. The scattered light is also slowed down in a biological sample, which shifts its phase — the timing of the peak of the waveform — by a small amount. While this phase shift is invisible to the human eye, it can be turned into visible contrast by also phase shifting the non-scattered light by 90 degrees. When the scattered and non-scattered light are ultimately focused on the retina, features in the sample are enhanced relative to the background, boosting the contrast. Zernike received the 1953 Nobel Prize in Physics for this discovery.

By the early 1940s, the phase-contrast microscope had proved its value and scientists speculated about adapting this technique to increase contrast in the electron microscope, which uses a beam of electrons to image much smaller structures, such as proteins. But attempts to make a phase plate that shifts the phase of an electron beam reduced the beam intensity too much, made the images unstable, or resulted in lower resolution.

In 2010, Müller and Robert Glaeser, now a Berkeley professor emeritus of molecular and cell biology, wrote a paper proposing a way to create the phase shift by using an intense laser, which would not dim the electron beam.

Glaeser is a pioneer of cryo-EM, a major improvement in electron microscopy and theoretically a simpler method for determining molecular structures than X-ray crystallography, which requires that a molecule actually forms a crystal and that the researcher has access to a bright source of X-rays. But a major problem with electron microscopy is that the electron beam heats up and eventually damages its target, limiting image detail. Coating the specimen with metal to prevent this and enhance the contrast only makes fuzzier images.

In the 1960s, scientists proposed freezing samples to slow down sample destruction. Glaeser demonstrated that freezing samples reduced radiation damage and proposed reducing damage even further by lowering the power of the electron beam while irradiating thousands of frozen molecules simultaneously. Though each molecule in the sample would be in a random orientation, computers could combine all the images to create a highly detailed structure.

The originators of cryo-EM were awarded a Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2017, and in their acceptance remarks credited Glaeser’s work. According to the Nobel Committee, cryo-EM “both simplifies and improves the imaging of biomolecules. This method has moved biochemistry into a new era.”

After the publication of the 2010 paper, Müller spent 15 years realizing the goal of a laser phase plate for cryo-EM, funded in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health. First, he and his team had to develop a way to focus a continuous laser onto a small spot to create light intense enough to shift the phase of an electron beam by 90 degrees. After 10 years, they achieved this by trapping the laser beam in a spherical, mirrored cavity that both focuses the beam and intensifies it as the light bounces back and forth more than 10,000 times.

“It’s 75 kilowatts focused to a few microns,” Müller said. “That’s more powerful than what you use for welding. It's more power than a military laser. It builds up the brightest continuous laser focus ever.”

They proved that the concept worked by installing a laser phase plate in one of Glaeser’s old microscopes, but Biohub funding later allowed them to purchase a customized, state-of-the-art Thermo Fisher Krios cryo-EM microscope and refit it. In the new paper, they demonstrate that the powerful focused laser beam produces higher resolution images for six different samples of different sizes and different sample preparation.

“For the most challenging cases — small particles, bad specimens — the laser produces a very considerable advantage,” Müller said.

In their paper, they show reconstructed images of a protein from muscle called aldolase, which is relatively easy to image with today’s cryo-EM machines, and for hemoglobin — a protein that carries oxygen in blood — which is at the lower limit for current machines. The laser phase plate improved the resolution of the protein structure in both cases, but more so for the smaller molecule, hemoglobin.

“The bottom line is, if you have a large protein and a really good sample — a fresh one or one frozen without bubbles, for example — you may not need the phase plate to get a single, high-quality image. But for a small protein and a bad sample, laser-on is best,” Müller said. “This could fill an enormous gap in our knowledge of protein structures that can’t be crystallized or are too small for today’s cryo-EM. And it will be revolutionary for cryo-ET.”

Protein size is measured in daltons — named after English chemist John Dalton and equivalent to 1/12 the mass of a carbon-12 atom — and cryo-EM today can barely image proteins smaller than 70 kilodaltons, which make up about 90% of the human proteome. With the laser phase plate, it’s now possible — though difficult — to image down to 50 kilodaltons (even smaller than hemoglobin).

Soon, Müller hopes, this will be improved to 17 kilodaltons (the size of the protein myoglobin). He is optimistic that that can be achieved with a focused electron beam, as opposed to a defocused beam, which without the laser phase plate is now required to get any contrast at all. This advantage would be another benefit of the laser phase plate and would deliver another factor-of-two boost in contrast and signal-to-noise ratio, on top of the one already achieved. A laser phase plate should be able to extract contrast from phase changes in the focused electron beam alone, he said.

“This technology is a step function change for biology,” said Stephani Otte, Biohub’s Vice President of Imaging Science. “We are going to be able to see how molecular machines operate inside the living cell, in context, for the first time. What was once invisible will become visible — and that changes everything about how we understand disease.”

Müller’s co-authors are Glaeser, UC Berkeley postdoctoral fellows and co-first authors Petar Petrov and Jessie Zhang; staff scientist Jonathan Remis, postdoctoral fellow Hang Cheng; and current and former physics graduate students Jeremy Axelrod, Eric Cooper, Ian Hicklin, Shahar Sandhaus and Cooper Schnurr.

Carragher and David Agard, founding scientific director of imaging at Biohub, are co-leads of Biohub’s Dynamic Structural Cell Biology group and co-corresponding authors of the Biohub preprint, along with Biohub engineer Pavel Olshin.


Cryo-EM protein images with and without laser phase plate 

Cryo-EM images of two proteins, apoferritin and hemoglobin, taken without and with a laser phase plate. The images are analyzed in a computer to produce detailed 3D structures of the proteins.

Credit

Holger Müller, Jessie Zhang/UC Berkeley

 

Physics meets aging: Researchers lay the foundations of gerophysics


“The goal is to build predictive models that bridge changes across biological scales: from subcellular to organism level, and timescales from cellular turnover to lifespan.”




Impact Journals LLC

Foundations of Gerophysics 

image: 

Figure 1. Speakers and chairs of the conference from left to right: Sebastien Thuault, Weilan Wang, Ee Hou Yong, Marija Cvijovic, Dmitrii Kriukov, Leong Kim Whye, Peter Fedichev, Brian K. Kennedy, Morten Scheibye-Knudsen, Weihan Huai, Maximilian Unfried, Jan Gruber, Peter James Mullen, Yifan Yang, Uri Alon, Andrei E. Tarkhov, Steffen Rulands, Glen Pridham, Ben Shenhar, Yumi Kim, Michael Rera, Nir Eynon, Csaba Kerepesi, Woon-Puay Koh, Matt Kaeberlein, Andrew Teschendorff, Andrew Rutenberg, Kumar Selvarajoo, Haiyang Wang, Vadim Gladyshev. Missing in the picture are Feng Ling and Kamil Pabis.

view more 

Credit: Copyright: © 2026 Unfried et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.






BUFFALO, NY — June 11, 2026 — A new meeting report was published in Volume 18 of Aging on May 14, 2026, titled “Foundations of Gerophysics.”

The report was led by first author Maximilian Unfried and corresponding authors Maximilian Unfried and Brian K. Kennedy from the National University of Singapore

Aging is often studied through biology, genetics, and medicine. Yet despite tremendous advances, many fundamental questions remain unanswered: Why do organisms age at different rates? Why does resilience decline over time? And can the trajectory of aging be predicted before disease develops? Researchers participating in the inaugural Global Conference on Gerophysics explored whether answering these questions may require integrating biology with the quantitative principles of physics.

Held in Singapore on March 5–6, 2025, the conference brought together 160 researchers from physics, biology, computation, and medicine and featured 31 speakers from institutions around the world. The meeting focused on developing a predictive and testable science of aging by applying concepts from dynamical systems, thermodynamics, network theory, stochastic processes, and artificial intelligence to biological aging.

One major theme was the search for simple mathematical principles capable of explaining complex aging phenomena. Uri Alon of the Weizmann Institute of Science presented the “saturated removal” model, a framework that explains several hallmark aging patterns—including rising mortality rates and declining physiological function—through the balance between damage production and damage removal. Building on this work, Yifan Yang demonstrated how the same model may help distinguish interventions that extend lifespan from those that specifically compress sickspan, potentially improving quality of life in later years.

Researchers also explored whether aging itself may resemble a physical phase transition. Peter Fedichev and Jan Gruber described a phenomenological theory in which aging emerges from instability within gene regulatory networks. Their framework links resilience, entropy, and mortality patterns across species and suggests that age-related decline may follow predictable physical laws. Related presentations examined how network instability, loss of robustness, and critical transitions could help explain the progression from healthy aging to frailty and disease.

Artificial intelligence emerged as another major topic. Matt Kaeberlein discussed the “Million Molecule Challenge,” an ambitious effort that combines automated lifespan experiments and machine learning to screen more than one million compounds for longevity-promoting effects. Andrei Tarkhov presented work showing how AI-guided protein design can enhance cellular reprogramming factors used in age-reversal research, improving reprogramming efficiency by more than two orders of magnitude in human cells.

Several talks focused on biological age measurement and aging clocks. Andrew Teschendorff described advances in epigenetic clocks and showed how single-cell analyses are helping researchers distinguish stochastic age-related changes from biologically meaningful aging signals. Steffen Rulands presented evidence that age-related changes in DNA methylation may reflect collective behaviors emerging across genomic regions, suggesting that aging can be studied as a multi-scale physical process extending from molecular interactions to organism-level decline.

The conference also highlighted the growing importance of systems-level approaches. Researchers discussed how network science can model cascading failures in biological systems, how entropy-based measures may provide new biomarkers of aging, and how computational analyses of large clinical and molecular datasets are identifying potential geroprotective interventions. Presentations ranged from reproductive aging and skeletal muscle aging to comparative studies examining why some species live dramatically longer than others.

Metabolism and longevity were another key focus. Peter James Mullen presented multi-organ metabolomic analyses across several species, revealing tissue-specific metabolic signatures associated with aging. Maximilian Unfried described comparative lipidomics studies showing that longer-lived species exhibit more robust lipid interaction networks, while Brian K. Kennedy discussed the challenges of translating aging biomarkers into clinical tools capable of guiding interventions and assessing biological aging in humans.

A recurring message throughout the meeting was that future progress will depend on close collaboration between theory and experimentation. Rather than relying solely on increasingly complex datasets, participants emphasized iterative cycles in which mathematical models generate predictions that can be tested experimentally, with new data then refining those models.

The panellists noted that interdisciplinary communication remains a hurdle, urging joint training initiatives to align the languages of biology, physics, and computational science.”

The conference concluded with broad consensus around four priorities for advancing Gerophysics: the development of shared multi-modal datasets, physics-based definitions of aging and rejuvenation, predictive models capable of forecasting intervention outcomes, and stronger translational links between animal studies and human aging research.

As aging research increasingly incorporates tools from physics, artificial intelligence, and computational science, Gerophysics aims to transform aging biology from a largely descriptive discipline into a predictive science. By uncovering the quantitative principles that govern resilience, decline, and longevity, researchers hope to accelerate the development of interventions that promote healthier aging across the lifespan.

Paper DOI: https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.206378                

Corresponding authors: Maximilian Unfried – unfried@nus.edu.sg, Brian K. Kennedy – bkennedy@nus.edu.sg 

Keywords: aging, gerophysics, geroscience, aging biology, longevity, complex systems, theoretical physics

Click here to sign up for free Altmetric alerts about this article.

______

To learn more about the journal, please visit www.Aging-US.com​​ and connect with us on social media:

Click here to subscribe to Aging publication updates.

For media inquiries, please contact media@impactjournals.com.

 

Newton reloaded: Dresden physicists go beyond the action–reaction principle



Technische Universität Dresden

Illustration Newton Reloaded: Dresden Physicists Go Beyond the Action–Reaction Principle 

image: 

Flocks of birds, bacteria and tissue cells: in some collective systems, the individual elements respond to only part of their surroundings and therefore do not follow Newton’s third law, which states that action equals reaction. Physicists at the Cluster of Excellence ctd.qmat in Dresden have developed a remarkable theory that allows these exceptions to be efficiently described and simulated far more accurately. The trick is that auxiliary degrees of freedom — shown here as green birds — give the theory the flexibility it needs to precisely describe even these exceptions to Newton’s law.

view more 

Credit: Kilian Neddermeyer





Newton and Fields of Vision

Birds have a wide field of vision. Yet when they fly in a flock, they orient themselves only toward the birds in front of them or alongside them. Because a bird never aligns itself with a bird behind it, the flock seemingly defies Newton’s third law — the principle of action and reaction, often summed up as “for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.” When we run, for example, our feet push against the ground and the ground pushes back with an equal but opposite force. The same principle is at work when we drive a car, jump, row, or let air escape from a balloon: when the air is expelled backward, the balloon flies forward. Everyday life is full of movements that obey Newton’s third law, which is more than 300 years old and forms a cornerstone of classical mechanics. “Whatever we normally teach our students in theoretical mechanics, it ultimately rests on the action–reaction principle,” explains research group leader Marín Bukov.

Flocks of birds, swarms of bacteria, people in crowds, and tissue cells, by contrast, do not obey Newton’s third law, because the components of these systems respond to only part of their surroundings. This makes the interaction unidirectional, meaning that “action equals reaction” no longer applies. These exceptions are known as non-reciprocal interactions. Until now, they could not be fully described with the classical theories developed for reciprocal interactions, and therefore these systems could not be simulated efficiently. Efficient simulation, however, is essential for studying processes in the human body or the motion of flocks and swarms. This research gap has now been closed by the findings of a Dresden physics team working with Roderich Moessner. Moessner is a Principal Investigator of the Würzburg–Dresden Cluster of Excellence ctd.qmat — Complexity, Topology and Dynamics in Quantum Matter — and director of the Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems in Dresden.

Newton Reloaded: Physicists in Dresden Find an Elegant Solution

“The research team has developed and proven a theory that makes much of what we teach our students applicable to non-reciprocal systems as well. These systems, where Newton’s third law does not apply, can now finally be described exactly and simulated precisely — even using established methods. This is exactly the kind of tool that has been missing in recent years,” says Bukov.

To achieve this, the team of physicists expanded the original action–reaction framework. To describe non-reciprocal systems using the tools developed for reciprocal systems, all that is needed are additional artificial variables. Here is how it works: theoretical physicists usually model nature in equations. Each variable describes a degree of freedom that actually exists — such as the position or speed of a bird, the position of a fish in a school, or the position of a car in traffic. “The trick behind the new theory is that it constructs a partner for each component of the system — a fictitious partner that doesn’t exist in nature. The original non-reciprocal interactions are replaced by reciprocal interactions with these auxiliary degrees of freedom,” explains Bukov’s colleague Ricard Alert, a biophysicist.

What does that mean for a flock of birds? “To simulate the birds’ movements precisely, we describe the dynamic system ‘flock of birds’ using established methods — as if it were a reciprocal system, even though it is not. The elegant solution is to artificially place an fictitious bird in front of each real bird, aligned in exactly the opposite direction,” says Alert.

Putting the Results in Context, Outlook

Introducing auxiliary degrees of freedom is nothing new in physics. What is new, however, is that these auxiliary degrees of freedom now make it easier to study systems with non-reciprocal interactions. On the one hand, this allows researchers to use the established theoretical framework of many-body physics. On the other, it enables non-reciprocal systems to be simulated with much greater accuracy. Above all, the findings deepen physicists’ fundamental understanding of these processes — and such understanding is always the basis for future discoveries.

“In Würzburg and Dresden, we study quantum matter whose particles interact under certain conditions in ways that give rise to new phenomena such as magnetism or lossless current transport. The exciting question now is whether these exceptions to Newton’s law lead to entirely new forms of collective quantum behavior. We still know very little about this — and that is precisely what makes this so fascinating,” says Moessner.

The findings of the Dresden physics team have been published in the journal Nature Physics.

Publication

Hamiltonian description of non-reciprocal interactions; Yu-Bo Shi, Roderich Moessner, Ricard Alert & Marín Bukov, Nature Physics (2026), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-026-03317-0

ctd.qmat

The Cluster of Excellence ctd.qmat — Complexity, Topology and Dynamics in Quantum Matter — at Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg and Technische Universität Dresden explores and develops novel quantum materials with tailored properties. Around 300 researchers from over 30 countries work at the interface of physics, chemistry, and materials science to lay the foundations for tomorrow’s technologies. In 2026, the cluster entered the second funding period of the German Excellence Strategy of the Federal and State Governments — with an expanded focus on the dynamics of quantum processes.