Wednesday, June 24, 2026

It’s Hard To Espresso How Pressure Affects Brewing





By


When a physics student asked baristas at the Warsaw Coffee Conference what their biggest question for scientists was, the baristas said they wanted to know how to stop channeling during brewing.

Channeling is an issue that arises as hot water passes through a pressed “puck” of espresso. The water follows the path of least resistance through the coffee grounds, resulting in an uneven brew and bitter flavor.

In Physics of Fluids, by AIP Publishing, researchers from the University of Warsaw set out to determine the physical properties of espresso brewing to improve the preparation process.

“As physicists, we turn coffee into research on a daily basis,” said author Maciej Lisicki. “Now we made it the subject, and not the fuel.”

Using a barista-grade coffee machine and a pressure sensor, Lisicki and his team brewed hundreds of cups of espresso at varying pressures.

They found that at lower pressures, the coffee behaves like a regular porous medium, and the amount of pressure of a liquid through a porous medium is directly proportional to its flow and discharge. However, espresso is usually brewed using about six to nine times the pressure of the atmosphere, and Lisicki said that at those levels, something funny starts happening.

After about 30 to 40 seconds, all the coffee dissolves, and what is left can be classified as a poroelastic material. This type of material exhibits nonlinear pressure dynamics, meaning that as the pressure is increased in the espresso machine, the flow rate of the water through the coffee puck no longer increases.

“This poroelastic compaction has been alluded to in the coffee community, but with no systematic evidence,” Lisicki said. “I think we characterized this effect for the first time, and that enticed us to formulate a theoretical description.”

Lisicki is excited to continue his team’s espresso research and hopes to be able to dedicate more resources to understanding the complex physics behind espresso brewing.

“Being theoretical physicists, we were more than happy to jump into the math behind it, and we came up with a coarse-grained model that explains this variability with applied pressure,” he said. “It also gives us insights into the dissolution dynamics seen at shorter times.”

In addition to studying the motion of the water through the coffee puck, the researchers plan to use glass beads for imaging so they can get eyes on a brewing process usually hidden by machinery.

“Physics is about answering mysteries that are unsolved, and it turned out that coffee has these mysteries in it just as well as galaxies do,” Lisicki said.

Did Two Historical New York And New Jersey Hurricanes Trigger Tsunamis?


NY and NJ coastline from Stevens Campus. CREDIT: Stevens Institute of Technology


By

Drawing on historical storm and flooding records, combined with computer simulations, Stevens researchers analyze a little-known natural phenomenon called a continental shelf seiche that can cause unanticipated flooding hours after storms pass, and had been mistaken for a tsunami in the past. The findings can better inform flood forecasting and bear important safety implications for New York and New Jersey coastal communities.

A seiche is a wave that forms when water in a lake, bay or harbor begins sloshing back and forth between its coasts, after being disturbed by strong winds. “The motion is similar to water rocking inside a bathtub after being pushed,” explains Research Associate Professor Philip Orton, who studies storm surges, flood forecasting and coastal engineering and adaptation at Stevens School of Engineering and Science’s Department of Civil, Environmental and Ocean Engineering. “Instead of passing through only once and dissipating, the wave bounces off or reflects between the sides of the tub until it peters out.” In nature, this wave reflects off the coastlines that bound the body of water until it loses its energy. 

A different type of seiche called continental shelf seiche can occur at the continental shelf locations, where the sloping edges of a continent submerge in the ocean. In such places, the ocean tends to be so vast and deep that it acts like a solid border or a wall, pushing the wave back to the shore. “Continental shelf seiches are much less widely known than the classic type of seiches that occur in enclosed or semi-closed bodies of water,” explains Orton, “largely because there is no obvious reflecting boundary on the deep ocean side.”

The New York Bight — a roughly triangular, coastal stretch that spans from Cape May, New Jersey, to Montauk Point on Long Island, New York — sits directly on the continental shelf. “So when the wave goes to the edge of the continental shelf, about 100 miles offshore, and hits this stationary deep ocean that doesn’t want to move, the wave bounces off it and comes back to shore,” Orton explains. 

A recent study by Orton and PhD candidate Tam Trinh found that the New York Bight is more susceptible to continental shelf seiches than other coastal areas within the larger, Mid-Atlantic Bight. When researchers compared 17 coastal tidal gauges across the Mid-Atlantic Bight, they found that water level oscillations in the New York Bight were anomalously large compared to other regions. “In our study, we found that these oscillations are triggered by abrupt changes in wind forcing,” explains Trinh. “Strong onshore winds can push large volumes of water toward the coast as a storm surge, and when the wind weakens, changes direction, or the storm moves away, the water can be released and then oscillate.”

Researchers outlined their findings in the new paper, titled Historical resurgences after tropical cyclones in the Mid-Atlantic Bight: A primary mechanism and hotspot, published in the journal Continental Shelf Research

Historical data analysis shows that the New York Bight is a hotspot for such “resurgence,” including two occurrences that were so intense they were misidentified as tsunamis.

In 1938 and 1944, two major hurricanes struck Long Island and, after the initial winds subsided, the surges came back unexpectedly hours later, leading observers to mistakenly believe they had witnessed a tsunami. More recently, smaller post-storm resurgences happened in 2020, hours after Hurricane Isaias abated, causing some coastal flooding in the New York Harbor and surrounding areas. 

“A continental shelf seiche can occur after a hurricane has passed and can cause a surprise onset of dangerous currents and flooding if it coincides with high tide,” Orton says. “Where mistaken for tsunamis, there was likely a coincidence of high tide, the continental shelf seiche, and very large storm swells all superimposed, causing an additional period of dangerous conditions,” he clarifies.

“In New York Harbor and the neighboring coastal areas, the seiche period is approximately 7 to 8 hours, meaning that resurgences of high-water levels arrive every 7 to 8 hours after the initial storm surge,” Trinh explains. “Due to this timing, continental shelf seiches may coincide with high tide and amplify coastal water levels, potentially leading to secondary coastal flooding many hours after a storm has passed. And, unlike short-duration storm-surge peaks, these seiche oscillations may persist for several tidal cycles.”

The seemingly improving post-storm weather conditions can catch residents and first responders off guard. People may decide that because the storm passed, the worst flooding is over — only to experience a renewed rise in water levels afterwards. These secondary surges can also generate strong currents in harbors, bays and inlets, damaging docks and boats and flooding roads, tunnels, subway systems and low-lying neighborhoods that may be in the middle of recovery operations. 

In the era of accelerating sea level rise, these findings have a growing importance. Higher baseline water levels mean that even moderate resurgence waves are more likely to exceed flood thresholds. Infrastructure that previously flooded only during the main storm surge may flood again when the crest of the seiche arrives.  

Orton cautions that for the densely urbanized environment of the New York Bight — with its interconnected tunnels, transit systems, ports, electrical infrastructure and millions of residents near the shoreline — these secondary surges can have severe consequences. “Continental shelf seiches are less studied and harder to forecast than ordinary storm surges,” explains Orton. “Our research aims to better understand the risks and improve flood forecasting and emergency management.”

Iceland kills first whales since 2023, resuming whaling




By Euronews with AFP
Published on 23/06/2026 

Iceland's Marine and Freshwater Research Institute has recommended that no more than 150 fin whales are caught in the 2026 season.

Two whales were killed off the coast of Iceland overnight Sunday, two days after commercial hunting resumed, local media and animal rights activists reported Monday.

The kill ends a two-year pause and marks the first catches since 2023.

Icelandic public broadcaster RUV reported that two fin whales were killed. The fin whale is the second largest animal on Earth after the blue whale.

Before the vessels set off on Friday, a protester had attached himself to one of the masts in the port of Reykjavik, but climbed down and was escorted away by police.

Iceland, Norway and Japan are the only three countries that still openly permit whaling, despite international condemnation from the public and animal welfare organisations.


Iceland cancelled its whale hunt over the past two years, partly because economic problems had cut demand and the industry was not deemed profitable enough.

"The first fin whale deaths in Iceland's hunt this year are devastating," said Joanna Swabe, European senior public affairs director for animal rights group Humane World for Animals.

"Iceland has killed more than 1,000 fin whales in the past two decades -- not only the second largest animal on the planet but also a species classified as globally vulnerable to extinction," Swabe said in a statement.

Iceland's government has said it is planning to introduce a bill aimed at banning whaling this autumn.

The International Whaling Commission banned the commercial killing of whales in 1986 amid alarm at the declining stock of the marine mammals.

Iceland's Marine and Freshwater Research Institute has recommended that no more than 150 fin whales are caught in the 2026 season.

That represents a 28-percent drop on the annual quota it recommended for the period 2018–2025, it said.

The institute has set an annual catch of 168 animals for the minke whale hunt this year, a 23-percent drop on 2018-2025.





Fauci Summoned To Testify Before Powerful Senate Committee In July

SENATOR RAND PAUL PERSECUTES THE HERO OF COVID


Dr. Anthony Fauci. Official White House photo by Tia Dufour/Wikimedia Commons


June 24, 2026
 The Center Square
By Thérèse Boudreaux

(The Center Square) – The Republican head of a powerful U.S. Senate committee has subpoenaed Dr. Anthony Fauci, demanding the former chief medical advisor testify before lawmakers about his response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

“For six months, I have been negotiating with Anthony Fauci’s lawyers over a date to testify before my Homeland Security Committee. He finally agreed to appear this month. Then he backed out. So I subpoenaed him,” Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee Chairman Rand Paul, R-Ky., posted on social media Tuesday. “He will testify in July.”

In a separate post, Paul outlined some of the questions he intends to ask Fauci, who headed the nation’s pandemic response.

“Did Dr. Fauci fund gain-of-function research while telling Congress he didn’t? Why were records destroyed? And why did he need a presidential pardon? The American people deserve answers, and I am going to make sure they get them during our hearing next month,” Paul said.

Fauci, who received a preemptive pardon from former President Joe Biden, has faced criticism over his handling of the pandemic response.

Paul and other Republicans have accused Fauci of covering up the true origins of the virus after a National Institutes of Health official revealed in 2024 that U.S. taxpayer dollars had indeed funded what many would term “gain of function” research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the area where the virus was first discovered.

The admission contradicted Fauci’s assertion to Congress in 2021, under oath, that the “NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” a statement Republicans considered intentionally misleading.

Paul’s subpoena Monday came just days after former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard declassified hundreds of documents, which she claims “expose Fauci’s direct role in influencing and manipulating IC assessments on COVID-19.”

Among other records, Gabbard declassified the U.S. taxpayer-funded research on coronaviruses, which analyzed the risks of coronavirus spreading from bats to humans, that NIH had admitted to funding. The controversy-ridden nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance conducted those studies, some of which dated back to 2014.

During the pandemic, Fauci repeatedly discouraged the idea that the virus originated from a lab.

But the other documents Gabbard declassified, which largely consist of email exchanges between federal health and IC officials, fall short of proving that he “worked with politicized career leadership in the Intelligence Community (IC) to suppress the truth about his actions” and the lab leak theory.

The declassified information shows Fauci was included in the communications between federal health agencies and the Intelligence Community, both involved with pandemic research and response and both attempting to clear up conflicting information.

Per the emails, Fauci often advised IC officials – who specifically asked health officials for advice and clarification on how to interpret virus-related research and other theories – and recommended they consult certain health experts for additional information. He also provided his opinion that the virus was zoonotic in origin when asked.

Most health officials in the emails, whose names were largely redacted, emphasized caution related to assertions that the virus was created in a lab.

One email written by an IC official read “Hi team – Is anyone looking at the open source report that a Chinese virologist claims to have proof that COVID-19 was made in a Wuhan lab? We’re getting questions from our leadership and I figured those with more technical expertise probably have already evaluated this report.”


A recipient – presumably from the NIH, but both the name and office of the respondent are redacted – informed the IC official that the study in question had numerous errors and was published by a pair of nonprofit groups, which had never before released any medical research, linked to political strategist Steve Bannon.

Some of the health officials acknowledged that coronaviruses were likely studied in the WIV lab. They also confirmed that a lab analysis found that “all of the necessary conditions for an accidental release of a laboratory-modified coronavirus — specifically a coronavirus adapted to recognize human cell receptors” were present at the WIV in 2019.

However, they pointed out to IC officials that the authors of the report determined the findings “place equal weight on the hypothesis” of an accidental lab leak versus the virus emerging naturally in Wuhan.

“I’ve been tracking this pretty closely in the literature, and would advise to set a very high threshold for any GOF [gain of function] interpretation as an origin of SAR COV-2,” a health official whose name is redacted said. “Not saying it is impossible, but I think Occam’s razor is the best guidance here. […] To be honest – I cannot imagine the Chinese NOT doing this type of research, but an escaped P3+/P4 LAI would be extraordinary.”

While the origins of the virus still remain under debate, the White House has officially endorsed the lab leak theory.


HUMAN RIGHTS = RELIGIOUS RITES

Kyrgyzstan: Five Reform Adventists Held In Pre-Trial Detention For Two Months – Analysis

The three men and two women face criminal charges of “Production and distribution of extremist materials”. If convicted as a group, each faces 5 to 7 years’ imprisonment.

June 24, 2026 
F18News
By Felix Corley

Shortly before midnight in the evening of 17 June, a Judge at Bishkek’s Birinchi May (Pervomaisky) District Court ordered five members of the now-banned True and Free Reform Seventh-day Adventist Church held in pre-trial detention for two months. The five – three men and two women – face criminal charges of “Production and distribution of extremist materials”. The case appears to relate to material the Church members had on their phones. If convicted of acting as a group, each faces a jail term of 5 to 7 years and a possible post-prison ban on specific activity.

Police are holding Yevgeny Zhuravsky, Igor Kozlov, Sergey Kozlov, Olga Selova and Valeriya Yantsen at Bishkek’s Prison No. 21 (see below).


Police Investigator Adilet Asanbayev opened the criminal investigation on 13 April, just four days after the National Security Committee (NSC) secret police deported the head of the Church in Kyrgyzstan, Pastor Pavel Shreider, after his prison term was changed to a fine. Investigator Asanbayev formally launched a criminal case against the five Adventists on 15 June. Forum 18 was unable to reach Investigator Asanbayev (see below).

Based on information from an officer of the Police Counter Extremism and Illegal Migration Service, a 28 May court decision authorising a house search claimed that True and Free Adventists continue to meet and “abide by methods of caution and conspiracy” (see below).

On Saturday 6 June, police raided at least seven homes of Church members in and around Bishkek where small groups of Church members had gathered (Saturday is a holy day for Adventists). Officers searched the homes and seized documents and mobile telephones. Officers then detained several of the Adventists and took them for questioning. They released all of them later that day (see below).

On 15 June, police summoned some of the True and Free Reform Adventists questioned earlier for further interrogation. Officers focused on whether the individuals had Church publications which officials had deemed “extremist”. Police held the five for 48 hours. Investigator Asanbayev then applied to court to have them held for two months (see below).

Investigator Asanbayev told Church members he will look into the activity of other Church members and summon them for interrogation. He said he was looking to charge suspects as a group. “This is a real threat to at least 20 others,” one Church member told Forum 18 (see below).

Another Church member describes the raids, searches and arrests as “a new wave of persecution”. “The process of overturning the decision made against a church organisation illegally accused of extremism has not yet been completed,” the Church member told Forum 18. “And now the remaining believing brothers and sisters have been subjected to further repression.”

Forum 18 asked the Interior Ministry Press Service in Bishkek why Police launched the April raids, interrogations and criminal case against True and Free Adventists who have not committed violence against anyone or called for violence against anyone. Forum 18 has received no response to its questions (see below).

Deputy Chair Meder Karabayev and Chief Specialist Alisher Alybayev of the National Agency for Religious Affairs and Interethnic Relations in Bishkek did not answer their phones each time Forum 18 called (see below).

A Bishkek-based commentator who has been following the case warns that it “could establish a concerning precedent”. “There is a risk that such legal frameworks may be broadly applied to restrict the activities of unregistered religious minorities and penalise their members under the guise of combating extremism” (see below)

On 19 March 2025, Alamudin District Court in Chuy Region banned the True and Free Reform Adventist Church as an “extremist” religious organisation. The Supreme Court in Bishkek later rejected the Church’s appeal against the ban. Indira Aslanova, Senior Expert of the Centre for Religious Studies, an independent organisation in Bishkek, described accusing the True and Free Adventists of “extremism” as “absurd” (see below).


The NSC secret police arrested Pastor Shreider in Bishkek in November 2024. Officers searched his home and those of about 10 other church members. They seized thousands of books, including Bibles, as well as cash and mobile phones. The NSC returned the books in 2025 (see below).

After their arrest, NSC secret police officers tortured Pastor Shreider and another detained church member Igor Tsoy during interrogations. “I was given blows on my head, chest and given kicks in my spine from behind by five officers,” Pastor Shreider wrote in a November 2024 complaint. No one has been punished for the torture (see below).

On 10 July 2025, nearly three months after his criminal trial began, Bishkek’s Birinchi May District Court jailed Pastor Shreider for three years, to be followed by deportation. The Supreme Court in Bishkek changed the rest of his prison term to a fine of 3 months’ average wage on 25 March 2026. He was freed the same day but was soon deported (see below).

Among other prisoners of conscience jailed for exercising freedom of religion or belief, 37-year-old Muslim prisoner of conscience Asadullo Madraimov was freed from prison on 25 March after completing his sentence. He was punished for criticising the authorities for closing Kara-Suu District’s Al-Sarakhsi Mosque in the southern Osh Region. He visited his lawyer Khusanbai Saliyev in Osh days after his release. “He told me he has lost his health, and in our country, medical rehabilitation projects have been closed,” Saliyev told Forum 18 (see below).

Others jailed for exercising freedom of religion or belief

In addition to members of the True and Free Reform Seventh-day Adventist Church, the regime has jailed others for exercising freedom of religion or belief.

Muslim prisoner of conscience Asadullo Ibrakhimovich Madraimov (born 22 July 1988) was arrested in October 2023 and jailed for three years in February 2024. He was punished for criticising the authorities for closing Kara-Suu District’s Al-Sarakhsi Mosque in the southern Osh Region. He was freed on 25 March 2026 at the end of his sentence. (Each day in pre-trial detention before a verdict comes into force counts as two days of a sentence.)

On 3 April, ten days after his release, Madraimov visited his lawyer Khusanbai Saliyev in Osh. “He told me he has lost his health, and in our country, medical rehabilitation projects have been closed,” Saliyev told Forum 18 the same day.

Another member of the Al-Sarakhsi Mosque community, Mamirzhan Tashmatov, was freed from prison in May 2024.

In July 2023, a court jailed Protestant Aytbek Tynaliyev for 6 months for allegedly “inciting religious enmity” for social media posts sharing his faith.


On 4 December 2019, the National Security Committee (NSC) secret police opened a criminal case against so far unspecified members of the Jehovah’s Witness national centre in Bishkek under Article 313, Part 2, Point 2 of the Criminal Code then in force. This punishes “Incitement of racial, ethnic, national, religious or inter-regional enmity (discord) conducted by a group of people in a prior conspiracy” with jail terms.

Forum 18 asked the NSC secret police in writing on 26 March 2026 (re-sent on 26 May):

– Whether the criminal case is continuing or has been closed;
– If it has been closed, when it was closed; and
– Why local Jehovah’s Witnesses have not been kept informed of the course of this criminal investigation.

Forum 18 had received no response by the end of the working day in Bishkek of 18 June.

Forum 18 asked the National Agency for Religious Affairs and Interethnic Relations in Bishkek in writing on 26 March 2026 why the regime jails individuals – including Madraimov, Tashmatov and Tynaliyev – for exercising freedom of religion or belief. Forum 18 had received no answer to its question by the end of the working day in Bishkek of 18 June.
True and Free Reform Seventh-day Adventist Church among banned communities

The True and Free Reform Seventh-day Adventist Church in Kyrgyzstan is part of a reform movement within Adventism that emerged during the Soviet period. (It is separate from the Seventh-day Adventist Church, with its headquarters in the United States.) One of its leaders, prisoner of conscience Vladimir Shelkov, died in a Soviet labour camp in 1980.

The Church – which was led by Pastor Pavel Shreider – chooses not to seek state registration. Exercising freedom of religion or belief without state registration is illegal and punishable.

The Church can no longer meet for worship because of the ban. It previously met in its place of worship in the village of Lenin in Alamudun District of Chuy Region, just north of Bishkek. Officials have not seized the place of worship.

The regime has previously banned Ahmadi Muslims, and cancelled the state registration or a Falun Gong association.

The NSC secret police raided the Bishkek congregation of the Council of Churches during a harvest festival worship meeting in September 2025 and police summarily fined two congregation leaders. Officers again raided the church’s Sunday meeting for worship on 19 April 2026. Police handed a summary fine to the Pastor. NSC secret police officers have visited at least one other Council of Churches congregation in 2026.

Police raid Adventist homes

On 13 April, just four days after the secret police deported Pastor Pavel Shreider, police opened a criminal investigation related to members of the True and Free Reform Adventist Church. The Investigator is Adilet Asanbayev of the Police of Bishkek’s Birinchi May (Pervomaisky) District.

On 28 May, Judge Eldarbek Mamyrov of Birinchi May District Court approved Investigator Asanbayev’s request to conduct house searches of Church members as part of the criminal investigation, according to one of the decisions seen by Forum 18.

The court decision notes that A. Kurmanbekov, an officer of the Police Counter Extremism and Illegal Migration Service, submitted a written report to Birinchi May District Police on 13 April. He claimed he had received “operational information” that a group of people from Bishkek and the villages of Mayevka and Lenin had “spread the ideology of the extremist organisation” of the True and Free Reform Adventist Church. The criminal investigation was launched on this basis.

Kurmanbekov claimed that “operational investigative measures” had established that Church members continued to meet at Church leaders’ homes on Saturdays (the holy day for Adventists).

“To coordinate their activity,” the court decision reads, “personal contacts, messaging apps and closed communication groups are used, through which participants share information about the place and time of meetings, and abide by methods of caution and conspiracy, whereby they leave a house in small groups of two or three people with an interval, and on leaving a house they look around so as not to attract attention from a large number of people.”

On Saturday 6 June, police raided at least seven homes of Church members in and around Bishkek where small groups of Church members had gathered, those close to the Church told Forum 18. Officers searched the homes and seized documents and mobile telephones. Officers then detained several of the Adventists and took them for questioning. They released all of them later that day.

Church members then found out about the case under Criminal Code Article 332 “Production and distribution of extremist materials”.

Following the raids, several of those questioned fled the country.
Interrogations, arrests

On 12 June, the Justice Ministry’s State Service for Judicial Expert Analysis completed its “expert analysis” of books seized from Church members. This noted that Church members refuse military service. “When in the army, people cannot be simultaneously faithful to their faith and to the orders of their superiors,” the analysis quotes a Church book as declaring. It claims that a text describes Church members as the “people of God” who are “opposed to people of secular views”. It adds that “religious convictions are placed above service to the country and civic duty”.


On 15 June, police summoned some of the True and Free Reform Adventists questioned earlier for further interrogation. Officers focused on whether the individuals had Church publications which officials had deemed “extremist”.

Initially police summoned Church member Yevgeny Zhuravsky. They decided to hold him for 48 hours until a court could approve his pre-trial detention. Towards evening that day, police summoned other Church members for questioning, including Igor Kozlov, Sergey Kozlov, Olga Selova and Valeriya Yantsen. The four were similarly placed in 48-hour detention (at least one of them at 2 am on 16 June). Officers threatened to hunt down Church members who had fled abroad.

On 15 June, Investigator Adilet Asanbayev formally launched a criminal case against the five Church members, according to court documents.

Officers again searched Church members’ homes and confiscated literature. They returned most of it, but sent some for “expert analysis”.

Officers were investigating those detained under Criminal Code Article 332, Part 1. This punishes “Production, distribution, transportation or forwarding of extremist materials, or their acquisition or storage for the purpose of distribution, the use of symbols or attributes of extremist organisations, as well as through the Internet or mass media”. Punishments are a jail term of 3 to 5 years, with or without a subsequent ban on specific activity for up to 3 years.

“The Article talks about ‘storage for the purpose of distribution’,” one Church member told Forum 18. “There was no actual distribution, it’s just that they found these items on their phones. And now they’re applying this Article to it.”

The Investigator is seeking to upgrade the charges to Criminal Code Article 332, Part 2. This punishes those acting as a group and bears a prison term of 5 to 7 years, with or without a subsequent ban on specific activity for up to 3 years.

The Bishkek lawyer Janysh Barakov is defending the five Adventists.

Officials at Birinchi May District Police would not put Forum 18 through on 18 June to Investigator Adilet Asanbayev, but gave his mobile number. However, Asanbayev did not answer.

Forum 18 asked the Interior Ministry Press Service in Bishkek in writing on the afternoon of 18 June why Police launched the April raids, interrogations and criminal case against True and Free Adventists who have not committed violence against anyone or called for violence against anyone. Forum 18 also asked for contacts of the Interior Ministry’s Counter Extremism and Illegal Migration Service. The Press Service responded later in the day, asking for Forum 18 to submit its questions officially in writing. Forum 18 re-sent the questions in writing. Forum 18 had received no response by the end of the working day in Bishkek of 18 June.

Deputy Chair Meder Karabayev and Chief Specialist Alisher Alybayev of the National Agency for Religious Affairs and Interethnic Relations in Bishkek did not answer their phones each time Forum 18 called on 18 June. An Agency official refused to give Forum 18 the direct number of the other Deputy Chair, Aybek Iminov.


“This situation warrants close monitoring, as it could establish a concerning precedent,” a Bishkek-based commentator who has been following the case told Forum 18 on 18 June. “There is a risk that such legal frameworks may be broadly applied to restrict the activities of unregistered religious minorities and penalise their members under the guise of combating extremism.”
Court orders pre-trial detention

)Police Investigator Adilet Asanbayev presented the pre-detention requests against the five True and Free Reform Adventists – Yevgeny Zhuravsky, Igor Kozlov, Sergey Kozlov, Olga Selova and Valeriya Yantsen – to Bishkek’s Birinchi May (Pervomaisky) District Court. Late in the evening of 17 June, Judge Aida Zhogoshtiyeva ordered all five held in pre-trial detention for two months as the investigation proceeds. The Judge issued the decision at about 11:30 pm.

Officials then took the five Adventists to Bishkek Prison No. 21. Their address:

720005 Bishkek,
Oktyabr District,
Geologicheskiy pereulok 2,
Uchrezhdenie No. 21 Ispolneniya Nakazaniy
“This is a real threat to at least 20 others”

Police Investigator Adilet Asanbayev told True and Free Reform Adventists on 16 June that he will look into the activity of other Church members and summon them for interrogation. He said he was looking to charge suspects as a group.

“This is a real threat to at least 20 others,” one Church member told Forum 18.
Regime crushes True and Free Reform Adventist Church

The National Security Committee (NSC) secret police arrested the head of the True and Free Adventist Church, Pavel Davidovich Shreider (born 10 January 1960), in Bishkek in November 2024. Officers searched his home and those of about 10 other church members. They seized thousands of books, including Bibles, as well as cash and mobile phones.

The NSC secret police later returned the 2,196 books they confiscated during the November 2024 raids. The NSC handed back about 80 per cent of the books in spring 2025. It returned the rest in September 2025.


After their arrest, NSC secret police officers tortured Pastor Shreider and another detained church member Igor Tsoy during interrogations. “I was given blows on my head, chest and given kicks in my spine from behind by five officers,” Pastor Shreider wrote in a November 2024 complaint to the then National Centre for the Prevention of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment in Bishkek. Officers “hit me with an iron pipe to force me to confess that I committed crimes”.

NSC secret police officers used a stun gun to try to coerce Tsoy to write a statement against Pastor Shreider, causing multiple injuries. However, Tsoy refused to do so.

The then National Centre for the Prevention of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment claimed that the torture cannot be corroborated. Officials who participated in the arrest and investigation of Pastor Shreider denied that officers tortured Pastor Shreider and church member Tsoy.

Under the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, Kyrgyzstan is obliged both to arrest any person suspected on good grounds of having committed, instigated or acquiesced to torture “or take other legal measures to ensure his [sic] presence”, and also to try them under criminal law which makes “these offences punishable by appropriate penalties which take into account their grave nature”.
Court bans True and Free Reform Adventists as “extremist”

On 19 March 2025, Alamudin District Court in Chuy Region banned the True and Free Reform Adventist Church as an “extremist” religious organisation. The civil case had been brought by Chuy Region Prosecutor’s Office with the close involvement of the NSC secret police.

Indira Aslanova, Senior Expert of the Centre for Religious Studies, an independent organisation in Bishkek, told Forum 18 in July 2025 that accusing the True and Free Adventists of “extremism” is “absurd”.

On 4 August 2025, Kyrgyzstan’s Supreme Court in Bishkek rejected the appeal against the ban. The Supreme Court upheld the ban permanently, and there is no possibility of challenging it in Kyrgyzstan.

In September 2025, church members lodged a further appeal to the United Nations Human Rights Committee in Geneva, church members told Forum 18.

In 2025, officials added the True and Free Adventist Church to the “list of organisations deemed terrorist and extremist by the courts” on the websites of the General Prosecutor’s Office and the Justice Ministry’s Probation Department. The General Prosecutor’s Office also includes on its list of “informational materials deemed extremist by the courts” unnamed “printed and electronic versions of materials (books)” produced by the Church, based on the March 2025 Alamudin District Court decision.


As of 18 June 2026, the True and Free Adventist Church does not appear on the list of banned “destructive, extremist and terrorist organisations” on the website of the National Agency for Religious Affairs and Interethnic Relations. Nor does it appear on a list on the website of the National Security Committee (NSC) secret police.

Forum 18 asked the National Agency for Religious Affairs and Interethnic Relations in Bishkek in writing on 26 March whether the True and Free Adventist Church is still banned and, if so, why. Forum 18 pointed out that the Church is not listed on the National Agency website as banned. Forum 18 had received no answer to its questions by the end of the working day in Bishkek of 18 June.
Arrested Pastor Shreider transferred to prison medical unit because of brain damage

From his arrest in November 2024, Pastor Pavel Shreider was held for 10 months under NSC secret police supervision at Prison No. 21 in Bishkek.

Major Azat Kudaybergenov, Chief of Prison No. 21, told Pastor Shreider’s family on 22 September 2025 that he had been “examined multiple times by doctors at Institution No. 21, and diagnosed with traumatic brain injury (TBI) with cephalic syndrome. Stage 2 cerebrovascular insufficiency of mixed origin, with cognitive impairment.”

The family told Forum 18 that they believe that “several factors” may have contributed to Pastor Shreider’s condition. “Firstly, he is of an older age. The prison regime is not conducive for his body movement or exercise and his blood circulation is bad. Secondly, he probably has stress every day because of his arrest. And lastly and maybe most importantly, he was beaten by the police officers when he was arrested and given blows to his head.”
Pastor Shreider’s conviction, first unsuccessful appeal

On 10 July 2025, nearly three months after his criminal trial began, Bishkek’s Birinchi May (Pervomaisky) District Court convicted Pastor Pavel Shreider on charges of “incitement of racial, ethnic, national, religious, or regional enmity”. Judge Ubaydulla Satimkulov jailed the then 65-year-old Pastor for three years in a general regime labour camp. The Judge ordered his deportation to Russia at his own cost at the end of the prison term.

Pastor Shreider’s post-prison deportation was ordered on the basis of Article 70 of the Criminal Code: “After serving their sentence, a foreign citizen or stateless person shall be deported from the Kyrgyz Republic in accordance with the procedure established by international treaties that have entered into force in accordance with the legislation of the Kyrgyz Republic.”


Pastor Shreider was born in the village of Orlovka (now Ak-Dobo) in Talas Region of Soviet Kyrgyzstan. He was living in Russia at the breakup of the Soviet Union in 1991 and gained Russian citizenship.

Pastor Shreider’s defence lawyer Akmat Alagushev lodged an appeal against his conviction and jail term to Bishkek City Court on 7 August 2025. On 23 October 2025, the Court left Pastor Shreider’s sentence unchanged.
Supreme Court changes Shreider’s jail term to a fine, deportation order unchanged

After Bishkek City Court rejected Pastor Shreider’s first appeal, he lodged a final appeal to the Supreme Court in Bishkek.

On 25 March 2026, a panel of three Judges at the Supreme Court left Pastor Shreider’s conviction unchanged, including the deportation order, according to the initial decision seen by Forum 18.

However, the Supreme Court changed the remainder of Pastor Shreider’s prison term to a fine of 150,000 Soms. This represents about three months’ average local wage for those in formal work. The hearing was open and family and church members were able to attend.

Officials prepared documentation and released Pastor Shreider later on 25 March.


Pastor Shreider reluctantly paid the fine on 9 April, hours before NSC secret police officers deported him. Only then did Supreme Court officials hand over the full 25 March written decision.
NSC secret police deports Pastor Shreider

On 9 April, officers who said they were from the National Security Committee (NSC) secret police deported Pastor Pavel Shreider. “They put him in a car, took him to the land border and banned him from re-entering the country,” someone who knows him told Forum 18 in May. “There were no deportation documents and they put no mark in his [Russian] passport.”

Pastor Shreider’s wife Nelya was not ordered deported, but chose to leave the country separately the same day.

Pastor Shreider was due to pay for his own deportation, but the NSC secret police officers did not demand any money on deportation day.
UN Special Rapporteurs’ concern over Adventists’ torture, arrests, prosecution

On 23 July 2025, five United Nations Special Rapporteurs – including Nazila Ghanea, Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief – wrote to the regime (AL KGZ 4/2025) about the “arrests, detentions and alleged torture” of members of the True and Free Reform Adventist Church, as well as the subsequent criminal prosecution of Pastor Pavel Shreider.


The Special Rapporteurs also noted the 19 March 2025 court ruling banning the True and Free Reform Adventist Church as “extremist”.

“While we do not wish to prejudge the accuracy of these allegations, we wish to express our serious concerns regarding the arrest, detention and prosecution of Mr. Pavel Schreider, along with the alleged use of torture and other ill-treatment against Messrs. Pavel Schreider, Igor Tsoi, Sergei Sharvan, and Yuri Pauls,” the Special Rapporteurs wrote. They pointed out that “If the above allegations would prove to be accurate, they would be in contravention” of various articles of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).

“Serious allegations of torture and ill-treatment have been made with regard to Mr. Schreider and the other male members of the congregation during their detention,” the Special Rapporteurs told the regime. “It is reported that the male and female members of the group witnessed SNCS officers striking the heads and bodies of the seven male members of the group, including Mr. Schreider, Mr. Pauls, Mr. Igor Tsoi, Mr. Peter Petkau, all of whom reported ill-treatment in detention. It is reported that Mr. Schreider and Mr. Tsoi were additionally subjected to strangulation with cellophane bags and the use of tasers.”

The Special Rapporteurs also asked the regime how Pastor Shreider’s prosecution and the court-imposed ban on the Church are “compatible with the international human rights obligations”, including under the ICCPR. They also asked what measures had been taken to “investigate the credible accusations” of torture against the four Church members.
Regime’s response to UN Special Rapporteurs claims actions “in accordance with national law”, international treaties

The regime’s 20 September 2025 response to the UN Special Rapporteurs merely recounted the prosecution case against Pastor Shreider and the ban on the Church. It insisted that “the ban on the activities of the aforementioned association and the criminal prosecution of its individual members are carried out in accordance with national law and the international treaties to which the Kyrgyzstan is a party”.

The regime’s response also dismissed concerns about Pastor Shreider’s health condition in prison.
Two Adventists under criminal investigation allowed to leave

In 2024, National Security Committee (NSC) secret police investigators in Bishkek launched a criminal investigation into two other members of the True and Free Adventist Church, Igor Tsoy and Yuri Pauls. Officials had tortured both men following the 2024 raids on community members (see above). The investigator banned them both from leaving the country.


Although the investigation started over alleged pressure to fraudulently acquire individuals’ property, it soon transferred to an investigation of the Church. The NSC secret police undertook an investigation into the “underground organisation”. This also involved a “religious/linguistic expert analysis”.

On 24 April 2025, Bishkek NSC secret police Investigator Siymik Bolotov issued a decision (seen by Forum 18) not to open a criminal case against Tsoy and Pauls “connected with the absence of the component of a crime”. He noted that an instruction for information from NSC secret police officers in Bishkek had not received a response.

After repeated requests, the Investigator lifted the travel bans on Tsoy and Pauls, and both left Kyrgyzstan in 2025.

“The criminal investigation into the two men has been halted, but has not been closed,” a Church member told Forum 18.

NSC Investigator Bolotov did not answer his phone each time Forum 18 called on 18 June 2026.


About F18News
Forum 18 believes that religious freedom is a fundamental human right, which is essential for the dignity of humanity and for true freedom.
View all posts by F18News →



 

Expert views: Addressing water-management challenges in Central Asia

Expert views: Addressing water-management challenges in Central Asia
Among the water scarcity challenges: Large amounts of water will be needed to develop the IT and AI sectors, and to operate data centres and nuclear reactors. / gov.tmFacebook
By Rustem Kozhybayev, Eurasianet June 24, 2026

The problem of water scarcity is becoming one of the main challenges for the sustainable development of Central Asia. American experts shared their opinions on the lack of regulation of water resources in Central Asia and how the United States can help states in the region address existing challenges.

Dania Arayssi, who coordinates the Central Asia Center at the New Lines Institute for Strategy and Policy in Washington, DC, noted that water-related issues are one of the most important development challenges facing Central Asian leaders today, and that they influence social stability and sustainable economic development. The New Lines Institute is promoting a concept called the Silk Seven-Plus that advocates for the creation of a Central Asian economic community: cooperation on water-management issues is envisioned as a catalyst for the initiative.

The United States is showing increased interest in developing economic relations with the Central Asian states, as evidenced by the C5+1 summit held in Washington last November. This could pave the way for increased US investment in the industrial, IT and agricultural sectors of Central Asia.

“Large amounts of water will be needed to develop the IT and AI sectors, and to operate data centres and nuclear reactors,” Arayssi said. “It is natural for the United States to want to help find durable solutions on water issues. Establishing a sound and effective water-management framework will unlock Central Asia’s trade potential.”

The framework for an effective regional water-management system already exists, in the form of two institutions – the International Fund for Saving the Aral Sea (IFAS) and the Interstate Coordination Water Management Commission of Central Asia (ICWC). But these bodies currently lack mechanisms to enforce their decisions.

“Until both institutions have effective ways of ensuring the implementation of decisions, they will continue to be ineffective in managing the region’s water resources,” Arayssi said.

Wilder Alejandro Sanchez, president of the consulting firm Second Floor Strategies in Washington, DC, echoed the need for the creation of effective enforcement mechanisms.

“I like the idea of a Central Asian Commission on Water Resources, but I don’t think it will be the key to resolving water issues in Central Asia unless the Commission can ensure that governments carry out its recommendations,” he said.

China has a role in helping Central Asian states establish a stable and effective water management framework, Arayssi pointed out. Currently, China drains a substantial amount of water from transboundary rivers for its own agricultural purposes, aggravating a water-resource challenge in neighbouring Kazakhstan. Astana has sought to engage Chinese officials on the issue, but Beijing, so far, has stonewalled.

“If Beijing is truly a strategic partner for Kazakhstan, Chinese officials should demonstrate more openness in seeking a compromise solution on the water-use issue,” Arayssi said.

It’s not just the lack of effective water resource management mechanisms that exacerbates the challenges in Central Asia. Outdated infrastructure is causing lots of waste. According to some experts, up to 40% of the water used for irrigation in Central Asia is wasted due to antiquated technology and unlined canals.

“The United States and the European Union possess water-saving technologies that can help Central Asian states not only save water but also help prevent the desertification of agricultural lands,” Arayssi noted.

Sanchez added that the elimination of the US Agency for International Development hinders efforts to provide assistance that can address environmentally related issues.

“Many projects in the field of water security are relatively inexpensive, but they can bring significant returns, both for the population of the region and for strengthening relations with Washington,” he said. “Unfortunately, the current US administration does not regard environmental protection, water security in Central Asia, and climate change as priorities.”

When it comes to water resources management in Central Asia, it is necessary to keep in mind the relationship between water and electricity. In this regard, there are several examples of effective water management systems in the United States and Europe that can serve as role models for Central Asia, Arayssi suggested. 

One example is the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), which was established in the 1930s and covers six US states. For almost a century, TVA has successfully managed electricity generation and water resources in a way that ensures "sustainable business and job growth." There is a similar structure in Europe – the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR). Both organisations also have strong environmental components. 

Sanchez pointed to several other examples of interstate cooperation that Central Asia could emulate. For example, the governments of Moldova and Ukraine are working together to protect the Dniester River Basin, while Peru and Bolivia share Lake Titicaca and are working together to protect it.

International experience shows that effective water resources management is possible only through a combination of long-term planning, sustainable financing and commitment to decisions. External support from the United States, the EU and international financial institutions can be an important catalyst for change, but a sustainable solution to the water problem ultimately depends on the ability of the Central Asian countries themselves to negotiate the joint management of shared resources.

“Solutions cannot be imposed from the outside. It’s up to Central Asian states themselves to do the hard work,” Arayssi said.

Rustem Kozhybayev is a Washington, DC,-based journalist who writes about Central Asian affairs. A Russian-language version of this article was published by the Kazakh news agency Kazinfom. Eurasianet has an operating agreement with the New Lines Institute.

This article was originally published by Eurasianet here.

Alpine glacier melts faster as second heatwave hits France


By Yolaine De Kerchove Dexaerde
Published on

The Bossons Glacier in France’s Chamonix Valley is showing fresh signs of rapid retreat as a second heatwave of 2026 grips parts of Europe.

New aerial images reveal extensive ice loss across the glacier, which descends from the Mont Blanc massif above the popular Alpine resort of Chamonix. Meltwater streams can be seen flowing from the ice, while a large hole that emerged in the glacier's lower tongue in 2025 remains visible.

The Bossons Glacier has long been one of the most recognisable glaciers in the French Alps. In the 1980s, its ice extended to the valley floor, but decades of rising temperatures have led to a dramatic reduction in its size.

Scientists say glaciers across the Alps are shrinking at an accelerating pace as climate change drives hotter summers and shorter winters.

The latest heatwave across Europe has increased melting rates, exposing more rock and reducing snow cover that would normally help protect the ice.