Yemen cannot be reduced to simplified narratives such as “civil war” or a regional “Iran–Saudi proxy conflict.” What is unfolding in the country reflects the intersection of several long-term structural processes: the crisis of postcolonial state formation, the political economy of war and siege, and the contest among regional and global powers over strategic nodes of the world economy.

In this sense, imperialism is understood here not as a single state policy, but as a historically constituted system of military, financial, and logistical power through which core capitalist states and allied regional actors structure unequal relations with the periphery and control critical circuits of accumulation.

Situated at the junction of the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean, adjacent to the Bab al-Mandab Strait, Yemen occupies a geography of exceptional strategic importance. A significant share of global maritime trade and energy flows passes through this chokepoint. As a result, the Yemeni crisis extends far beyond national borders and must be understood as part of a broader reconfiguration of regional and global capitalism.

Historical Roots of the Crisis

The contemporary crisis in Yemen is rooted in divergent and incomplete trajectories of state formation in the North and South.

In the North, the Zaydi Imamate historically structured political authority through tribal and religious networks. The 1962 revolution overthrew the Imamate and established the Yemen Arab Republic, but the new state remained dependent on fragile alliances among tribal formations, military actors, and external patrons.

In the South, British colonial rule transformed Aden into a strategic imperial port from 1839 onward. Anti-colonial struggles culminated in British withdrawal in 1967 and the establishment of the People’s Democratic Republic of Yemen (PDRY), the only Marxist-oriented state in the Arab world, which attempted a state-led, non-capitalist development model.

Despite their differences, both formations were structurally vulnerable to external pressures, uneven development, and the constraints of insertion into a hierarchical global system.

The 1990 Unification and the Crisis of State Formation

The unification of North and South Yemen in 1990 is often interpreted as a national consolidation. However, it was largely shaped by the collapse of Soviet support for the South and the broader restructuring of the post–Cold War international order. Rather than producing a coherent social and economic integration, unification created a fragile political framework with deep internal asymmetries.

State institutions remained unevenly integrated, and political power became increasingly concentrated in the hands of northern elites aligned around President Ali Abdullah Saleh. These dynamics culminated in the 1994 civil war, which further consolidated central authority while deepening regional grievances, particularly in the South.

In the following decades, the Yemeni state increasingly functioned as a mechanism for distributing rents among military elites, tribal leaders, and segments of a dependent bourgeoisie. This rent-based configuration undermined the emergence of a developmental state and contributed to long-term structural fragility.

Rentier Structures and State Erosion

Even before the outbreak of full-scale war, Yemen represented one of the most fragile economies in the global periphery. Limited hydrocarbon revenues, dependency on foreign aid, and externally driven structural adjustment programs constrained the state’s capacity for redistribution and development.

High population growth, unemployment, regional inequality, and persistent rural marginalization widened the gap between state and society. Over time, the state ceased to function as a mechanism of social integration and instead became a contested arena for competing rent-seeking networks.

This crisis of legitimacy created the conditions under which new political actors, including Ansarullah (the Houthi movement), were able to expand their influence by filling institutional and governance vacuums.

The Economy of Siege and Social Reproduction

The war and blockade have transformed pre-existing structural vulnerabilities into a prolonged humanitarian and social crisis. Yemen’s dependence on imports for the vast majority of its food supply has made it particularly exposed to disruptions in trade, infrastructure destruction, and restrictions on maritime flows.

The economic effects of war extend beyond macroeconomic indicators. Households face persistent inflation in food, fuel, and essential services. Public-sector salaries have been irregular or suspended for long periods, contributing to the collapse of formal livelihoods.

Within this context, the burden of social reproduction has been disproportionately borne by women, who have had to sustain household survival under conditions of economic fragmentation, institutional breakdown, and ongoing insecurity. The war has therefore operated not only at the level of territorial control, but also through the reorganization of everyday life.

Militarism and Collective Imperial Intervention

The Saudi- and UAE-led intervention launched in 2015 marked a decisive escalation of the conflict. This intervention cannot be understood in isolation from broader systems of military and logistical support provided by Western powers, including the United States and European states.

Rather than a simple response to internal political instability, the intervention reflected a convergence of strategic objectives: maintaining regional power balances, securing maritime energy routes, and preserving influence over key geopolitical chokepoints.

At the same time, the conflict became integrated into global military-industrial circuits. Arms production, logistics, and geopolitical competition became intertwined with the continuation of war, contributing to its prolonged and self-reinforcing character.

Bab al-Mandab, Ports, and Logistical Capitalism

The strategic significance of Yemen is inseparable from its position within global logistical networks. Contemporary capitalism depends not only on production, but also on the continuous circulation of commodities through maritime corridors, ports, and infrastructural chokepoints.

From this perspective, control over ports, shipping lanes, and logistical infrastructure has become a central dimension of global competition. The involvement of regional actors in southern Yemeni ports and adjacent islands reflects broader struggles over these infrastructural circuits of accumulation.

Yemen thus occupies a position where questions of sovereignty, war, and global capital intersect directly with the material organization of global trade.

Escalation in the Red Sea and Regional Reconfiguration

Since late 2023, the conflict has entered a new phase shaped by the escalation of violence in Gaza and the wider region. In response to developments in Palestine and broader regional conflicts, Ansarullah expanded its operations in the Red Sea, affecting commercial shipping routes linked to Israel and its allies.

These actions have had measurable impacts on global shipping patterns, including rerouting of maritime traffic and increased insurance and transport costs. In turn, this has prompted direct military responses from the United States and its allies under multinational naval operations aimed at securing maritime traffic.

Rather than deterring further escalation, these developments have contributed to the regionalization of the conflict and its integration into broader geopolitical tensions spanning the Middle East.

Ansarullah and the Contradictions of Wartime Governance

Ansarullah emerged from long-standing patterns of regional marginalization, uneven development, and state crisis in northern Yemen. Over time, it has become the dominant governing authority in large parts of the country.

From a materialist perspective, the movement cannot be understood either as a purely external proxy or as a fully homogeneous political actor. It is an indigenous formation shaped by local social structures and by the pressures of prolonged conflict.

At the same time, its transition into a governing authority under conditions of war has generated internal contradictions:

  • increasing centralization of political and military power
  • reliance on war-time economic mechanisms and informal revenue systems
  • narrowing of political and civil space under emergency governance

These dynamics reflect broader tensions between military resistance and the longer-term challenges of social transformation and institutional development.

Southern Yemen and Fragmented Sovereignty

Southern Yemen remains a politically fragmented space shaped by competing actors, including separatist movements, local elites, tribal formations, and remnants of earlier socialist institutions.

While external actors have influenced and at times intensified these divisions, many of the underlying tensions originate in unresolved contradictions of the post-1990 unification process, including uneven development and political marginalization.

In the absence of a unified political project capable of addressing these structural inequalities, southern اليمن continues to function as an arena of overlapping local and regional interests.

Yemen and the Transition in Global Order

The Yemeni crisis must also be situated within broader transformations in the global system. The relative decline of unipolar dominance and the emergence of more fragmented and contested forms of global governance have reshaped the strategic importance of regions such as the Red Sea.

New infrastructural and economic initiatives, including those led by rising powers, have increased competition over trade routes and logistical corridors. However, these shifts do not necessarily resolve underlying asymmetries in the global economy.

Yemen, in this context, is not merely an object of great-power competition, but also a site where the contradictions of global capitalism, state fragility, and regional conflict converge.

Conclusion

Yemen represents a critical site where the long-term crisis of postcolonial state formation intersects with contemporary forms of imperial power and global capitalist reorganization.

While resistance to external intervention constitutes an important political and historical force, it does not in itself resolve the deeper structural contradictions of war, underdevelopment, and fragmented sovereignty.

Any durable resolution would require not only an end to military intervention, but also processes of economic reconstruction, social justice, and institutional transformation capable of addressing the underlying conditions that have produced recurring cycles of crisis.

The trajectory of Yemen therefore carries implications that extend beyond its borders, reflecting broader dynamics shaping the future of the Middle East and the global system.

References

Lenin, V. I. Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism (1917).
Harvey, David. The New Imperialism (2003).
Magdoff, Harry. Imperialism: From the Colonial Age to the Present (1978).
Wood, Ellen Meiksins. Empire of Capital (2003).

Hanieh, Adam. Lineages of Revolt (2013).
Hanieh, Adam. Money, Markets, and Monarchies (2018).
Achcar, Gilbert. The People Want (2013).

Carapico, Sheila. Civil Society in Yemen (1998).
Phillips, Sarah. Yemen and the Politics of Permanent Crisis (2011).
Salisbury, Peter. Yemen: National Chaos, Local Order (2017).

Cowen, Deborah. The Deadly Life of Logistics (2014).
Mezzadra, Sandro & Neilson, Brett. The Politics of Operations (2019).

UN OCHA Yemen Situation Reports (various years).
UNICEF Yemen Humanitarian Data (various years).
Lackner, Helen. Yemen in Crisis: Autocracy, Neo-Liberalism and the Disintegration of a State (updated edition).
Blumi, Isa. Destroying Yemen: What Chaos in Arabia Tells Us About the World (2018).
Brandt, Marieke. Tribes and Politics in Yemen: A History of the Houthi Conflict (2017).
Various UN OCHA Yemen Humanitarian Updates (2022–2025).
International Crisis Group reports on Yemen (various)