Monday, January 25, 2021

Scientists Found the Oldest Known Grizzly Bear in Yellowstone

Scientists found a 34-year-old grizzly bear in southwest Wyoming, identifying him by a mark on his lip made by biologists in 1989. That’s the oldest grizzly ever known in the Yellowstone region that includes parts of Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming. Respect your elders.
© Photo: Jim Urquhart, File (AP) A grizzly bear roams near Yellowstone National Park.

There’s no telling if there are older grizzly bears currently roaming Yellowstone, since hundreds of the creatures are completely unmarked by scientists. But this one is by far the oldest one on whom there is scientific documentation.

Sadly, though, biologists had to put the bear down. He was captured last summer after he got caught preying on calves on nearby ranches. After euthanizing the creature last July, biologists found an identifying tattoo on its lip that read 168—a mark given to the creature in 1989.

This Is Alex, the First Antarctic Penguin Born in Mexico

The bear was a male, which is notable, as female grizzlies generally live longer than males. Previously, the oldest known grizzly in Yellowstone was bear 399, a female who died at 27.

When caught, 168 had just three teeth left, and they were ground down to nubs—a sure sign of old age, and an explanation for why the animal was going after easy prey like calves. He was also quite emaciated, weighing in at just 170 pounds (77 kilograms), which is nothing for a grizzly. When he was captured in the Shoshone National Forest in August 1991, records show he weighed 450 pounds (204 kilograms). 
© Photo: Zach Turnbull/Wyoming Game and Fish Department (AP) This 2020 photo provided by the Wyoming Game and Fish Department shows the worn, mostly toothless jaw of Grizzly 168. The grizzly was the oldest documented in the Yellowstone region. Bear biologists euthanized the 34-year-old grizzly due to its poor health.

Yellowstone biologists consider grizzlies’ bodily health based on a 1-to-5 scale, with 1 being in the worst shape and 5 being the worst. When he was captured, 168 was rated a zero. Because of his failing physical condition, Fish and Wildlife Service biologists made the call to euthanize the animal last July instead of relocating him to a more remote part of Yellowstone.

“It was sad that we had to put him down, but ethically there was nothing else that could be done, Dan Thompson, a biologist with Wyoming Game and Fish told the Jackson Hole News and Guide. Pour one out.

Researchers know quite a bit about the bear from past records. Grizzly 168 was first captured when he was three years old—that’s when scientists gave him his identifying tattoo—and then captured again in Fremont County, Wyoming in spring 1996. Over the next year, he lost his radio collar, so scientists aren’t totally sure what he was up to, but DNA tests show that he likely fathered three kids in the mid-2000s, and may have had some more kids in later years when he was 23 and again when he was 31.

Conditions are hard for grizzlies, which makes 168's life all the more remarkable. There are only 1,800 grizzlies left in the contiguous U.S., including roughly 700 in Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. That’s just a small fraction of the 50,000 who roamed the land before Anglo-Americans colonized the West in the 1800s. The bears have faced pressure due to threats including hunting and habitat degradation. Climate change has increasingly played a role since the bears rely on seeds and berries for nutrition and fattening up for winter hibernation as well as reproduction season. Rising temperatures have increased the likelihood of droughts that can curtail fall seed crops. Research on Alberta grizzlies also found that certain berry crops could pop up earlier in the year, creating a what’s called a “phenological mismatch” for bears need the nutrients the most.

Despite the risks, it’s not all bad news for grizzlies. The creatures’ numbers have been increasing since they were given federal protection in the 1970s, with the Yellowstone population rebounding from just over 100 in the 1970s. Fish and Wildlife Service removed Yellowstone grizzlies from the Endangered Species List in 2017, but they were placed back under the federal protections after a court ruling last year. So hopefully, 168's kids will have a shot at a bright future.
Monarch butterfly numbers plunge from millions to thousands
© Provided by Daily Mail 

The number of monarch butterflies wintering on the California coast has plummeted to a record low, according to entomologists.

Fewer than 2,000 monarchs were recorded in November and December, compared to 200,000 barely three years ago.

In the 1980s, the monarch butterflies migrating south to groves from Marin County to San Diego was estimated at 4.5 million.

By 1997, when volunteer counts began, that number dwindled to about 1.2 million.

The overwintering population plummeted from 200,000 in 2017 to less than 30,000 in 2018, representing a single year decline of 86 percent.

Climate change, habitat destruction and pesticides have all helped pushed the iconic orange-and-black butterfly to the brink of extinction, experts say.

Scroll down for video© Provided by Daily Mail Fewer than 2,000 monarch butterflies were recorded in coastal California in November and December, compared to 200,000 barely three years ago

Starting in early November, western monarchs fly thousands of mile from the Pacific Northwest to central and southern California—returning to the same site, and often even the same tree, to ride out the winter.

No individual butterfly completes the entire cycle, though: Females lay eggs on the return trip north and it can take up to five generations to complete the trek back to Canada.

Since 1997, groups of butterflies, known as flutters, have been tallied every fall by the nonprofit Xerces Society as part of the Western Monarch Thanksgiving Count.

Between November 14 and December 6, 2020, volunteers surveying tree groves on the California and Northern Baja coast counted just 1,194 insects at 246 sites.
© Provided by Daily Mail The Xerces Society, which began volunteer counts of monarch populations in 1997, has charted the insect's devastating decline
  
© Provided by Daily Mail Scientists at Washington State University predicted once the western monarch population dipped below 30,000, their numbers would drop even more precipitously. That threshold was crossed in 2019. The following year the monarch experienced a 93 percent drop

That represents the lowest number in the count's 23-year history, and a massive 93 percent decline from the 29,000 reported in 2019.

Traditional monarch meccas like Pismo Beach and Natural Bridges reported only a few hundred butterflies, the society said.

Pacific Grove, nicknamed 'Butterfly Town, USA' because of the thousands of monarchs that usually gather in the Monterey pine and eucalyptus trees there, had no monarchs at all.

THE AMAZING MIGRATION OF THE MONARCH BUTTERFLY

The 3,000-mile mass migration of monarch butterflies in North America is one of the insect world's fantastic feats.

Millions embarking on the arduous journey from as far north as Canada down into Mexico and the California coast each autumn.

The number of migrating monarchs has plummeted in recentyears.

Researchers said while an estimated one billion monarchbutterflies migrated to Mexico in 1996, that number stood atabout 35 million this past winter.

Threats to them includehabitat loss due to human activities, pesticides that killmilkweed and climate change, experts say.

Monarch butterflies living east of the Rocky Mountains spend their winters in Mexico to escape the cold weather while those west of the Rockies spend winters on the California coast before returning home in the spring.

Scientists say their orange color tells potential predatorsthey taste awful and are toxic to eat thanks to chemicals fromthe milkweed plants that nourish them in their larval state.

'Their absence this year was heartbreaking for volunteers and visitors flocking to these locales hoping to catch a glimpse of the awe-inspiring clusters of monarch butterflies,' said Sarina Jepsen, the Xerces Society's director of endangered species.

As recently as 2017, monarch populations in the region were still in the hundreds of thousands.

But a population viability model developed by researchers at Washington State University predicted the western monarch would quickly head toward extinction once its population dipped to 30,000 butterflies.

That threshold was crossed in 2018 and 2019, the society said, and now 'It seems that, unfortunately, this prediction was right.'

'We may be witnessing the collapse of the western migration of monarch butterflies,' the group added. 'A migration of millions of monarchs reduced to two thousand in a few decades.'

In all, the numbers recorded in the 2020 count represent a 99 percent decline since the 1980s.

Monarchs have been in decline elsewhere: The eastern migratory population —which travels from southern Canada to central Mexico—has dropped 80 percent since monitoring began.

Two workers at a monarch butterfly sanctuary in Michoacán, Mexico, were murdered just days apart in 2020. Authorities haven't announced a motive but illegal logging is common in the area, despite a ban to protect the butterflies, The Guardian reports.

In December 2020, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service declined to add the monarch butterfly to the Endangered Species Act, claiming it was 'warranted but precluded by higher priority actions.'

A month earlier, a California court ruled the state didn't have the authority to put insects on its own endangered species list.

Entomologists point to a number of human factors threatening the majestic insect, including increased pesticides, massive wildfires, the clearing out of groves for housing developments, and the loss of milkweed, the monarch caterpillar's sole host plant.

Climate change has also disrupted the monarch's migration patterns, researchers say, which are synched to season changes and the blossoming of wildflowers.
Bank of England told to stop buying 'high carbon' bonds

By David Milliken
© Reuters/John Sibley FILE PHOTO: 
A general view shows The Bank of England in the City of London financial district in London

LONDON (Reuters) - A group of British members of parliament said on Monday that the Bank of England should stop buying bonds from businesses whose activities accelerate global warming.

Britain's central bank doubled its holdings of corporate bonds to 20 billion pounds ($27 billion) last year as part of efforts to support the economy through the coronavirus pandemic.

The House of Commons' Environmental Audit Committee - which looks at public bodies' impact on global warming - said buying bonds from firms such as energy companies with high carbon emissions contravened government goals to reduce global warming.

"The Bank must begin a process of aligning its corporate bond purchasing programme with Paris Agreement goals as a matter of urgency," the committee's chairman, Philip Dunne, wrote in a letter to BoE Governor Andrew Bailey.

The parliament committee has no formal power over the BoE, which is operationally independent, but finance minister Rishi Sunak could potentially change the BoE's remit to require a greater focus on environmental issues.

Britain will host the global COP26 climate summit in September and Dunne said the BoE should set a good example.

Bailey said in July that the central bank would review its corporate bond holdings once the coronavirus pandemic was over, but said the BoE was right to provide financial support to a wide range of businesses in an economic emergency.


The BoE holds sterling corporate bonds roughly in proportion to the amount issued on markets.

This means 19% of bonds it holds were issued by electricity companies, 6% by gas companies and 3% by other energy companies, while 11% were issued by industrial and transport businesses that are often energy-intensive too.

Bailey has said financial institutions such as insurers need to pay greater attention to environmental risks and said a green 'stress test' of their business models to take place in June.


($1 = 0.7317 pounds)

(Reporting by David Milliken, editing by Andy Bruce)

Utah Officials Allegedly Failed to Disclose Mink Farm Worker Died of COVID After Outbreak

Amid ongoing debate over the threat posed by COVID-19 outbreaks on mink farms, state authorities in Utah allegedly failed to disclose the COVID-19 death of a mink farm worker linked to a coronavirus outbreak at a mink farm in the state.
© Ole Jensen/Getty Images Mink at the Knud Vest estate in Jyllinge, Denmark, pictured on November 14, 2020. State authorities in Utah allegedly failed to disclose the COVID-19 death of a mink farm worker linked to a mink farm coronavirus outbreak in the state.

The Utah Department of Agriculture and Food (UDAF) has also allegedly not been transparent about COVID-19 transmission in the wild and downplayed the threat mink farm COVID-19 outbreaks pose to humans, animal rights groups claim.

Scientists have previously warned the diseased mink could create a new uncontrollable store and vector for the transmission of coronavirus to humans and potentially pose a risk to future COVID-19 vaccines.

The mink farm outbreaks in Utah, which marked the country's first confirmed cases of COVID-19 infection in mink, were announced in statements released by the UDAF as well as the U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA APHIS) on August 17, 2020.


According to an email shared with Newsweek, which was among several documents obtained by an open records request made by the Utah Animal Rights Coalition (UARC) who shared the files with Direct Action Everywhere (DxE), an animal rights network based in the San Francisco Bay Area, "one farm manager has died from SARS-CoV-2 infection" following the coronavirus outbreaks at two mink farms in Utah back in August.

Neither of the August statements released by the UDAF and USDA APHIS mentioned the death of the mink farm manager noted in the aforementioned email, which was sent on August 10, 2020, a week before the statements were released by the UDAF and USDA.

Speaking to Newsweek, Wayne Hsiung, an attorney and investigator for DxE, which he co-founded, said: "The document [the email] was obtained through the state of Washington because the lab that did the testing for Utah mink farms was a public university in Washington. The state of Utah itself has refused to make these disclosures, citing the risk of break-ins by animal rights activists (including specifically DxE), and has never disclosed the site of any outbreaks, much less that an employee died."

In a blog post on the DxE website where the documents obtained by the open records request were published on Monday, Hsiung explained: "Given Utah's stonewalling, our partner groups submitted an open records act request to Washington State University [WSU], a public institution that is home to the Washington Animal Disease Diagnostic Library (WADDL), which carries out laboratory testing for the USDA and other agencies."

WSU released a set of documents including an email from Tom Baldwin, the director of the Utah Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory (UVDL) at Utah State University who was the veterinarian investigating the COVID-19 outbreaks on the Utah mink farms at the time, according to Hsiung.

UVDL is "a cooperative effort by Utah State University (USU) and Utah Department of Agriculture and Food (UDAF)," according to its website.

Baldwin's email, which was sent to WADDL Executive Director Timothy Baszler and WADDL Director of Operations Kevin Snekvik, stated: "We have a number of mink farms in which adult mink are dying at concerning rates. Moreover, farm personnel are experiencing upper respiratory infections and one farm manager has died from SARS-CoV-2 infection."

As indicated in the email, Utah State Veterinarian Dr. Dean Taylor, who works for the UDAF, was copied in Baldwin's email.

Hsiung told Newsweek: "The state veterinarian of the UDAF is cc'd [copied] in the correspondence. Given his role in protecting public health, one can assume that he knew about this death—and has chosen to not disclose it in the various public communications."
What Utah state health department and CDC say

Asked whether the Utah Department of Health (UDOH) was aware of the death of the Utah mink farm manager, as well as several other questions relating to that death, a public information officer at the UDOH told Newsweek that the department has been involved in an "on-going, collaborative response and investigation" of the Utah mink farm COVID-19 outbreaks with the UDAF, CDC and USDA APHIS.

"This investigation resulted in the link of an individual who recently passed from COVID-19 and who happened to be employed at the mink farm. At the time the person became ill, community spread had been increasing rapidly in the surrounding area. No additional deaths associated with mink farms have been reported. Currently, there is no evidence of mink-to-human transmission in the United States.

"All human lab-confirmed COVID-19 cases are routinely reported to UDOH through normal channels. Confirmed COVID-19 cases are interviewed by a contact tracer and appropriate quarantines are recommended. When a person in Utah dies and has tested positive for COVID-19, the death is investigated and the cause is determined by the Office of the Medical Examiner. All of these normal reporting and response steps occurred in this particular instance.

"In August of 2020, the Utah Department of Agriculture and Food (UDAF) notified the UDOH of an unusually high rate of mink mortality on a Utah farm, along with the suspicion that the mink deaths might be related to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 in humans. Our federal partners were immediately notified and Utah invited CDC to deploy a team of One Health experts to assist with on farm investigations of SARS-CoV-2 in people, mink, and other animals on affected Utah mink farms. Our federal partners have continued to support UDAF and UDOH in this on-going investigation and response.

"In response to these outbreaks, UDOH conducted epidemiologic investigations on any mink farm with a confirmed case of SARS-CoV-2 among their herds. From these investigations, it is suspected that infected workers introduced SARS-CoV-2 to the farms, and the virus then spread between mink. All epidemiologic evidence and test results indicate human-to-mink transmission with a person with COVID-19 infection introducing the virus onto each farm," the UDOH public information officer said.

Asked the same questions about the farm employee death, as well as why the manager's death was not mentioned in the August 17 USDA statement, a spokesperson for USDA APHIS told Newsweek: "USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) has worked closely with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and individual states, including Utah, throughout the COVID-19 outbreak to identify animals that should be tested, develop and recommend guidance for contact with animals, and to determine how to handle cases when they are confirmed in animals.

"APHIS' focus is on the health of animals in the United States, and our primary role is testing samples from animals and reporting confirmed cases to the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE). While we work closely with these partners on the overall response, it would be inappropriate for APHIS to maintain information about or comment on cases of COVID-19 in people. Your questions would be better directed to CDC [U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] or the Utah Department of Health," Cole added.

When the CDC was asked the same questions relating to the mink farm worker death, including whether the UDOH had reported that death in the state's COVID-19 death totals and shared any information about that death with the CDC, a spokesperson for the federal health body told Newsweek: "CDC defers to the Utah Department of Health to provide details on human COVID-19 cases linked with mink farms in their state. CDC has been collaborating with human and animal health officials in Utah and USDA regarding mink farms with SARS-CoV-2 since August 2020.

"Currently, there is no evidence of mink-to-human spread in the United States, however investigations are ongoing. Although, human cases have been identified in connection with all affected U.S. mink farms. It is suspected that infected workers introduced SARS-CoV-2 to mink on the farms, and the virus then began to spread among the mink and from mink to other animals like cats and dogs on the farm. Although for most people in the United States the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection from animals is low, there is a higher risk for people working on mink farms," the spokesperson added.

Newsweek has contacted the UDAF, Taylor and Baldwin for comment.

Asked whether there was any further information available about the death of the Utah mink farm manager, including how the employee got infected, Hsiung told Newsweek: "No. And unless public health authorities were conducting prospective genomic surveillance among the mink and the workers, we will likely never be able to definitively answer this question.

Hsiung explained in Monday's DxE blog post: "We cannot be sure the farm manager at issue died from mink transmission, given that the state of Utah has not disclosed any genomic testing at this site or any other site.

"But it appears that those investigating the outbreak were alarmed at the rate of infection among workers on these farms, and this is supported by peer-reviewed research from the Netherlands showing that 68 percent of mink farm workers and their close contacts had evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, a far higher rate of infection than the general population," he told Newsweek.
COVID-19 transmission in the wild and threat to humans

Last April, the Netherlands became the first country in the world to report COVID-19 cases among mink.

In a statement on May 19, 2020, the Dutch government said: "New research findings in the ongoing investigation into COVID-19 at mink farms suggest there has been a transmission of new coronavirus from mink to human."

Hsiung noted in the Monday DxE blog post: "Even Fur Europe, an umbrella organization representing the European fur industry, circulated an alert acknowledging this new development, writing on May 26 to its members that the coronavirus is 'transmissible from human to mink, and likely transmissible back to humans again.'"

But the UDAF has allegedly downplayed the threat mink farm outbreaks pose to humans and claimed there was no COVID-19 transmission in the wild, according to the UARC and DxE.

Speaking to Newsweek, UARC Executive Director Jeremy Beckham, who made the aforementioned open records request to WSU, said: "Last month [December], I had a hearing in front of the Utah State Records Committee trying to pry more records from the Utah Department of Agriculture. During that hearing, they made the claim that no serious threat existed to workers or wild animals.

"In fact, at the time they made these claims to the committee, the agency already had evidence that wild mink had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and that farm workers had been infected, including a manager on a Utah County mink farm had died of COVID," Beckham said.

During the aforementioned hearing, held on December 8, 2020, the UDAF claimed "that wild transmission has not occurred (and repeated this at a hearing on Dec. 10) to justify the lack of disclosure about mink farm outbreaks," Hsiung told Newsweek.

"Their [UDAF] argument is: We don't need to tell anyone about this because we have it contained. Subsequently, on Dec. 11, it was revealed [in an international public health mailing list published on ProMED] that wild transmission [in wild mink] has occurred—and from testing done sometime from August through October. This shows the state's brief was false. Whether that falsehood was intentional, I cannot say.

"The state of Utah apparently knew about this positive test, yet continued to falsely state that no wild animal transmission had occurred," he said.

Hsiung noted in the Monday DxE blog post: "The release of COVID-19 to the wild was apparently important enough for USDA scientists to warn international disease experts about—making global headlines—but not important enough for Utah to tell its own citizens."

Hsiung also told Newsweek: "Utah also strangely argues in the same filing on Dec. 8 that, while the risk from mink farms is low, the risk from animal rights activists is very high—citing a number of articles about DxE.

"They're on a razor's edge here because, on the one hand, they want to say daily operations at mink farms are not dangerous enough for people to know about but, on the other, dangerous enough that we can't let animal rights advocates know where they are. This is a contradiction. Either mink farms are dangerous or they're not. They can't only be dangerous for animal rights activists, but not for employees or surrounding community members," Hsiung argued.

Speaking to Newsweek, the former chief veterinarian at the USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service, noted: "If someone is looking for the exact locations of the affected mink farms to be identified, this is rather complicated as this would be under the State jurisdiction and not USDA/APHIS.

"That is because the regulations governing the actions APHIS can take as the federal branch of the government is limited by several factors, including whether or not the disease in causing illness in animals (as APHIS has no authority to address zoonotic infections), whether or not disease has spread outside the state boundaries and if the disease is located within the state borders, have they requested APHIS assistance; etc.

"With no mandatory animal ID laws, APHIS is quite often unable to confirm or share the exact farm location. APHIS has limited staff and relies on the local (state) 'certified' veterinarians to do their trace-backs. That also creates a problem when there is industry pressure on the state not to cooperate," Basu added.
COVID-19 outbreaks at Utah mink farms 'greatly worsened'

Beckham told Newsweek "the problem [COVID-19 outbreaks on Utah mink farms] has greatly worsened since August. We are up to at least 12 mink farms in Utah that have experienced COVID-19 outbreaks, as of early Dec 2020, which is the latest information I have. That's out of 36 farms total in the state. So one-third of Utah mink farms have been hit with COVID outbreaks.

"The latest statement that the Utah Department of Agriculture released is a press statement boasting that COVID-19 cases have been declining on Utah mink farms based on data collected in October and then December," Beckham added.

In a statement released on December 28, 2020, the UDAF stated: "UDOH and CDC began testing mink and other domestic animals on the farms, including dogs, cats and mice. Sampling also included farm workers and a small number of their household contacts. Initial testing showed positive results in mink, dogs, and feral cats on the farms.

"While the results and analysis are still underway for the third round of testing, there is encouraging evidence suggesting that the levels of virus are going down in the mink, cats and dogs living on the farm.

"Additional community sequencing is needed to fully understand the potential for transmission between people and different animal species in this area; however, at this time, based on extensive epidemiologic investigations, there has been no evidence to date of spread from mink to people in Utah," the statement said at the time.

However, Beckham told Newsweek: "This statement neglects to mention why it's impossible to draw any conclusions based on these data points: mink farms begin their 'pelting season' in November, where the overwhelming majority of their animals are killed and skinned, leaving only the breeding stock behind.

"Of course there are fewer COVID cases in mink—there are fewer mink. And the mink that do remain can be spaced in the sheds, making it more difficult for a respiratory virus to be transmitted. Breeding season starts in March and I fully expect to see these numbers rapidly climb again because the underlying problem has not been addressed," he added.

Related Articles
This Giant Ice Cube Represents How Much Ice We're Losing Every Year

We talk about ice a lot here on Earther—or more specifically, the growing absence of it. A new study puts what’s happening to the planet in striking perspective. While I can tell you the results show 1.2 trillion tons of ice disappeared every year since 1994, it’s a lot easier to grasp as a visual.

© Graphic: Planetary Visions That’s one big cube.

That cube of ice up there towers 6.2 miles (10 kilometers) into the sky like a sunshade over Manhattan and stretches over a huge swath of New Jersey, from Newark Airport to Jersey City. That’s how much we’ve lost to burning fossil fuels on average per year over the past two decades. The skyscrapers of the Financial District and Midtown are toothpicks. More ominously, the cube is getting bigger as ice loss accelerates.

The ice cube illustration is tied to a study published in the Cryosphere on Monday that looks at, uh, the state of the cryosphere. A team of scientists from across the UK used satellite measurements and climate models to explore what’s happening to every nook and cranny of ice around the globe. While most studies focus on either sea ice or ice on land, the new paper looks at both to give us a better understanding of how much ice has melted due to climate change.

A Third of American Rivers Have Changed Color Since 1984

“There has been a huge international effort to study individual regions, such as glaciers spread around the planet, the polar ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica, the ice shelves floating around Antarctica, and sea ice drifting in the Arctic and Southern oceans,” Tom Slater, the study’s lead author and ice researcher at the University of Leeds, said in an email. “We felt that there was now enough data to be able to combine these efforts and examine all the ice being lost from the planet.”

The results show Arctic sea ice is the fastest-disappearing ice on the planet. A staggering 7.6 trillion tons have turned to liquid from 1994 to 2017, the period for which the study had data. That was followed by Antarctic ice shelves, which have seen 6.5 trillion tons of ice vanish, sometimes in catastrophic fashion. The most recent example is Iceberg A68, a Delaware-size piece of ice that ripped off the Larsen C ice shelf in 2017 and has since wandered the Southern and Atlantic oceans. It most recently had a near run-in with an ecologically sensitive island.

But other, more insidious forms of ice shelf drama are afoot. The study doesn’t just look at ice area; it also looks at ice volume. And the most shocking impacts on ice shelves are happening beneath the surface. Ice shelves jut out over the ocean, holding back glaciers on ice sheets on land. But in West Antarctica, satellite and direct observations show warm water has been eating away at ice shelves and could eventually cause them to collapse. If that happens, sea level rise will accelerate and won’t stop for centuries; the ice in West Antarctica could raise seas by more than 10 feet (3 meters).

Glaciers on land in Alaska, the Himalayas, and elsewhere are also major drivers of sea level rise, as are the glaciers and ice sheets of Greenland. They’re all disappearing at an alarming rate. The threat of water loss in regions that rely on glacier and snowmelt is certainly an acute concern. So, too, is the disappearance of sea ice and its impact on traditional ways of life in the Arctic. And incremental but quickening sea level rise can play out in dramatic fashion when hurricanes roar ashore, pushing storm surge farther inland thanks to the climate change-driven boost. Perhaps most ominously, the melt is just a tiny aspect of the changes happening.

“We found that it took only about 3% of the excess heat created by greenhouse gas emissions to melt all this ice, a surprisingly small amount of energy to melt such a large amount of ice, which has a disproportionately large effect on our environment,” Slater said.

In that light, the giant ice cube from hell is showing just a tiny portion of the impact of human activities on the planet.
Shell buys European electric car charging firm ubitricity


BERLIN — Oil and gas giant Shell is buying ubitricity, a major provider of electric vehicle charging points in Europe.

Shell said Monday that it would buy a 100% stake in the Berlin-based startup, without disclosing the price.

“The move represents a further step in Shell’s efforts to support drivers as they switch to lower-carbon transport,” the company said.

The deal, which is subject to regulatory approval, will give Shell ownership of the biggest public EV charging network in Britain with more than 2,700 charge points.

Ubitricity also has smaller public networks in Germany and France, and has installed over 1,500 charge points for fleet customers across Europe.

The company's focus has been to integrate charge points into existing street infrastructure such as lamp posts, to reduce the cost of laying new power lines down streets.

Experts say easier access to charging facilities is key to the successful rollout of electric vehicles.

Shell has said it wants to achieve net zero emissions by 2050 or sooner.
BIG OIL SEE'S SILVER LININGS
How Joe Biden's anti-oil policies may be good for Canada's energy sector after all



© Provided by Financial Post While the Keystone XL cancellation was certainly a blow, U.S. President Joe Biden's decision to go full nuclear on his own oil industry may actually end up being a net positive for Canada, writes Martin Pelletier. 


Last week’s inauguration of U.S. President Joe Biden and his immediate decision to revoke the presidential permit for the Keystone XL pipeline and temporarily ban drilling on all federal lands sends a clear message of what’s to come from his administration when it comes to energy policy.

In our opinion, the response from Justin Trudeau — which included the “build back better” slogan that Biden used prominently in his campaign — was a sign that the PMO agrees with making climate change the number one priority when it comes to rebuilding the economy.

There is no denying the tremendous momentum behind the movement seeking to make the global economy cleaner and greener. Simple evidence of it can be found in the shares of Tesla Inc., a company that despite having less than one per cent of total auto sales is now worth more than the top seven auto manufacturers combined.

For those trying to fight this step change head-on, consider the estimated $40 billion in losses last year incurred by those who shorted Tesla shares, in the belief that the EV market and the stock had gotten ahead of itself. We think a much better strategy is to adapt to the tsunami of climate-change policy that is about to hit shore instead of standing in front of it.

That can mean looking beyond the headlines for unexpected outcomes.

While the Keystone cancellation was certainly a blow, Biden’s decision to go full nuclear on his own oil industry may actually end up being a net positive for Canada, freeing up market share for the million barrels a day of expected growth from our sector over the next two decades. Fortunately, this growth is currently fully supported by existing pipelines including TransMountain and Line 3. The key looking forward is how to add value in this environment.

The process of adaptation had already started following the oil price crash of 2014, which incentivized our industry to become more efficient. This has led to a focus on consolidation and cost control resulting in an impressive improvement not only in operating efficiencies but also carbon emissions. As a result, we see the energy sector being well on its way to developing the dividend-focused oligopoly model currently in place in other Canadian sectors, including banking and telecommunications.

Another positive is we expect a more stable oil price environment going forward. We believe the ongoing transition to renewables and clean technology will take a lot longer than many expect and as a result demand growth for oil will continue for some time with developing regions such as China and India leading the charge.

More so, we see a significant impact on the supply side, especially within the U.S. shale industry, which is important given this region’s explosive seven-million-barrels per day of growth over the past decade that contributed to an over-supplied global oil market.

We believe that Canada’s biggest competitor could soon be facing significant regulatory constraints paired with an exodus of the capital required even to sustain production. This would result in not only an increase in market share for our producers but also a more balanced supply situation and therefore more stable oil prices.

We think this is the level of certainty investors have been waiting for which would fit very well within a dividend-based model especially one offering high yields in a low-interest-rate environment. For those wondering the kind of upside there could be, simply look at oil producer share prices, as represented by the Capped Energy index, which is down 35 per cent over the past five years compared to oil prices that are up 65 per cent.

Finally, governments will also have to adapt by looking at ways to better harvest this more stable cash flow from oil and gas royalties and then identify how to redeploy it into those areas of the economy offering higher levels of growth. This sure sounds like a great way of building back better not only for oil companies and their investors, but also all Canadians.

Martin Pelletier, CFA, is a portfolio manager at Wellington-Altus Private Counsel Inc. (formerly TriVest Wealth Counsel Ltd.), a private client and institutional investment firm specializing in discretionary risk-managed portfolios, investment audit/oversight and advanced tax and estate planning.

Yukon premier upset at federal decision stalling mine development in the territory


WHITEHORSE — Yukon Premier Sandy Silver says a federal government decision to refer a proposed mining development back to a territorial assessment board sends a "troubling signal."

  
© Provided by The Canadian Press

A statement from Silver's office says the referral creates "unreasonable and unnecessary uncertainty" for developer BMC Minerals.

The Kudz Ze Kayah project is a proposed open pit and underground zinc, silver, copper, gold and lead mine east of Whitehorse, and Silver says the territory's assessment board had already issued recommendations about it.

He says Yukon was prepared to accept the recommendations and proceed, but the federal referral derails any action.

The project has undergone four years of review since BMC Minerals took it over in January 2015.

Natural Resources Canada did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Silver says his government opposes the referral and believes the territory's assessment board was reasonable to allow work to proceed with added improvements and monitoring.

"The Government of Canada absolutely needs to take steps to streamline these processes going forward to ensure greater clarity and certainty for the mining industry," Silver says in the release issued Monday.

A statement on the Kudz Ze Kayah website says the project should have annual production of just under 107,000 tonnes of zinc and smaller amounts of lead and copper over its nine-year life span, with all the ore shipped overseas through the port of Stewart in northwestern B.C.

BMC Minerals, an offshoot of United Kingdom-based BMC Ltd., says the project will provide jobs and business opportunities for Kaska First Nation citizens and local communities, supporting the territory and the rest of Canada.


This report by The Canadian Press was first published Jan. 25, 2021.

The Canadian Press
Contaminant from coal mines already high in some Alberta rivers: unreported data


EDMONTON — Some Alberta rivers and streams have already been heavily contaminated by coal mining, unreported government data suggests.
© Provided by The Canadian Press

The province's plan for large-scale expansion of the industry is fuelling widespread criticism that includes concerns over selenium pollution. The data shows that same contaminant has been found for years at high levels downstream of three mines and never publicly reported.

The findings raise questions about Alberta Environment, said a former senior official who has seen the data.

"There were lots of (selenium) numbers and it was consistently above the water quality guidelines and in many cases way higher," said Bill Donahue, the department's one-time executive director of science. "Why did Alberta Environment sit on these data for easily the last 10 to 15 years?"


Donahue left the department in 2018 after the NDP government of the day dissolved the Alberta Environmental Monitoring Evaluation and Reporting Agency, an independent body intended to fill information gaps.

Before resigning, he had become concerned about selenium in the Gregg and McLeod rivers and in Luscar Creek, all in the Rocky Mountain foothills east of Jasper, Alta. He took the data with him when he left and recently analyzed it for The Canadian Press.

"The results are stark," he said.


Since at least the late 1990s, Alberta Environment has monitored water upstream and downstream from the Luscar, Gregg River and Cheviot mines.


Cheviot, owned by Teck Resources, still operates. The Gregg River and Luscar operations closed in 2000 and 2003, respectively. Gregg River, now managed by Coal Valley Resources, is considered reclaimed. Luscar, managed by Teck, is about 50 per cent reclaimed.

Donahue looked at water samples from 1998 through 2016, taken upstream and downstream on the same day.


He found that selenium levels averaged almost six times higher in the McLeod River downstream from the Cheviot mine. They were nearly nine times higher in the Gregg River and 11 times higher in Luscar Creek, despite years of reclamation.


Selenium levels in all the samples from the Gregg River and Luscar Creek exceeded those considered safe for aquatic life: by nearly four times in the Gregg River and nearly nine times in Luscar Creek.


The level was exceeded in about one-quarter of the McLeod River samples.

"This is not a subtle story," said Donahue. "This is shocking."


Video: Study: Fossil fuel production set to exceed Paris agreement limit (Global News)


Alberta Environment and Parks spokesman John Muir said the department routinely monitors selenium at 89 waterways across Alberta.

"We have key experts working on our own water quality studies to better understand the conditions of watersheds and aquatic life downstream of coal mining operations," he said. "(We) will make those findings publicly available."

Muir pointed out that all raw monitoring data is available on a searchable database.

He said the mines in question pre-date modern regulations and technology.

An Alberta government document on reclaiming the mine sites states: "Current assessments indicate there is no risk to humans who drink water or eat fish containing excessive amounts of selenium."

Selenium is a naturally occurring element vital in small amounts but toxic in excess.

In fish, it can damage the liver, kidney and heart. It can reduce the number of viable eggs a fish can produce and lead to deformed spine, head, mouth, and fins.

In humans, it can cause nausea, vomiting, hair loss and fatigue.

The last time Alberta Environment reported on selenium in the three waterways was 2006. Using data collected in 2000 and 2001, it concluded "selenium concentrations in rainbow and brook trout were usually greater than toxicity effects thresholds."

Why the subsequent silence? asks Donahue.

"They knew when a report was published that selenium was a problem in these systems related to coal mining. It draws a lot of questions."

Last May, the United Conservative government revoked a policy that protected much of the eastern slopes of the Rocky Mountains from open-pit coal mining. The area is home to endangered species, the water source for much of the southern prairies, and one of the province's best-loved landscapes.

Hundreds of exploratory drill sites and kilometres of access roads have now been scribed into its wilderness, documents from Alberta's energy regulator show. One open-pit coal mine proposal is before a joint federal-provincial review panel.

More than 100,000 Albertans have signed petitions opposing the plans. Opponents range from small-town mayors to ranchers to popular entertainment figures, including Corb Lund and Jann Arden.

Mining opponents point across the boundary into British Columbia, where selenium from coal mines in the Elk Valley has created serious contamination problems.

The lingering contamination from the three Alberta mines shows the stakes are high, said Donahue.


"These pollution problems have persisted long after the closure of coal mines."

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Jan. 25, 2021

— Follow @row1960 on Twitter

Bob Weber, The Canadian Press

 

Letter from Russia: On the Protests of January 23

 Letter from Russia: On the Protests of January 23

A report from anarchists in Russia, describing the situation there during the protests of January 23, in which tens of thousands across the country rallied in response to the arrest of opposition leader Aleksei Navalny—expressing anger that runs much deeper. This article was first published by Crimethinc.

We have received the following report secondhand from anarchists in Russia, describing the situation there during the protests of January 23, in which tens of thousands across the country rallied in response to the arrest of opposition leader Aleksei Navalny—expressing anger that runs much deeper. It had been our hope that sooner or later, the unrest from Belarus might spill over into Russia—this is certainly the best hope for rebels in Belarus and elsewhere around the sphere of Russian influence, as well as all who suffer under Putin. We publish this here in the interests of fostering international perspectives among all who endure the consequences of capitalism and state power. May even revolt deepen and spread.

Today, January 23, a spark has been lit in the Russian Federation. From Moscow to Ulan-Ude, tens of thousands have poured into the streets for protests against Putin, corruption, and repression. At first glance, these demonstrations may seem like the same opposition protests that kick off every time a prominent opposition candidate is acutely repressed. But to us on the ground, we feel that something has shifted.

The usual passive attitude that is typical for these kinds of protests has been abandoned. People are fighting back against the police. Likewise, these rallies aren’t just in the typical places, nor are they comprised of just the same politically active upper-class people. From the city of Chita, we hear stories that the cops have been routed. In Perm, a crowd applauds after anarchists speak about rebellion, self-organized activity, and solidarity against repression. In Irkutsk, people are receiving anarchists and their words warmly as well. In one place, people block police cars, while in another, they de-arrest a protester. On one street, a man knocks out a cop, while on another, people chant “Freedom! Freedom!” as a woman wrestles a baton from a cop’s hand. Beyond the growing interest in anarchist ideas, which is certainly exciting, there is an even more exciting anarchic potential in the revolt that broke out today, however humble.

One exciting emergent tactic that has been snowball attacks on the police that have fostered confidence and maintained tension while also being an escalation people are comfortable with. If the point of an insurgency is to humiliate the authorities and motivate other partisans to take action, this is certainly a way to do so. In one video circulating on Telegram, you can even see a snowball attack escalating to an attack on an a vehicle with a state license plate [reportedly, a vehicle potentially associated with the FSB, the hated Russian Federal Security Service]. We have seen revolt begin to bloom in these tactics, but, on the other hand, repression has come too.

The state has admitted to over 3000 arrests. Videos depicting brutal police beatings have emerged. Para-state vigilantes were out in droves. Metro stations were shut down. No doubt more repression will follow; the Russian state has great repressive resources. However, like all states, they require a certain level of compliance from the people if they are to succeed in repressing crowds in the street and movements more generally. Cops were able to do their usual routine of muscling in and snatching people numerous times, but people also fought back, rescuing their comrades from the police or even driving police from some areas entirely.


Roughly translated, “The people are not sheep.”

Many people here seem to have seen Belarus as an example where repression and police violence didn’t force the rebels to back down. Chants and messages of solidarity with the struggle there can be found in many of the gatherings today. This fills us with hope—not in the sense that two nationalisms are greeting each other, but because these struggles are breaching their national borders. Every beach that the wave of insurrection makes is different, we all have different contexts, but we can also find common cause, resonance, and inspiration. We can find resonance with those in Belarus who rally against an oligarch whose grip may be slipping, with those who defend themselves from the police, and most importantly, with those who, at times, managed to out-pace the politicians whose experience of repression was among the original catalysts of the unrest.

We should perhaps mention that we have no praise to give Navalny, the politician whose arrest seemingly triggered this wave of protests. Navalny is an opportunistic ultra-nationalist bigot of a politician who paints himself as a populist using a narrative of anti-corruption politics that would only prop up a different batch of oligarchs and perpetuate oppressive attitudes in more pernicious ways. He isn’t even the most popular opposition politician, nor is his party the most popular. Funnily enough, the most popular opposition party is the Communist Party of Russia whose rank and file were also in the streets today. But we digress.

Today, we saw tactics and resolve to fight spread almost instantly across terrain and communal differences. Around 100,000 people got a taste of collective action. We hope that the topics of the protest generalize as well as the protests themselves, but this is as good of a stepping stone as any to take the next leap from. These next moments are crucial. How do we act cohesively, effectively, and decisively without military-like command structures, and without relying on the FBK (Anti-Corruption Foundation) for leadership? How can we operate without drawing too much repression down on our own distinct organizations or groups of friends? We still have many questions, but we also see that so much of what we need is already here.

We have sent this missive in hopes it reaches some American friends whose summer of fighting the police has been an inspiration to us, at least. In Russia, we have a saying, “the goats are eating the wolves,” where Americans might say “the pigs are flying.” In Russia, crooked cops are called werewolves and in the US, we understand cops, are pigs. So in the spirit of international solidarity, we say may the goats eat the wolves and let’s put wings on pigs.

Where there is misery, there is resistance.
Courage and cunning!
Not for Navalny, but for the people!

PS—Rebel greetings to those fighting in the streets of Tunisia! Down with the police-state!