Saturday, February 24, 2024

Alberta town bans Pride flags, rainbow crosswalks after plebiscite


Alberta town bans Pride flags, rainbow crosswalks after plebiscite© Provided by The Canadian Press

WESTLOCK, Alta. — Mayor Jon Kramer says he spent weeks telling residents in Westlock, Alta., not to vote for a bylaw that bans Pride flags and rainbow crosswalks on municipal property.

A slim majority in the town north of Edmonton voted Thursday to fly only government flags and paint crosswalks in a white striped pattern.

"As a council we're deeply disappointed, but we're not discouraged," Kramer said in an interview Friday.

"I firmly believe that Westlock is a kind and caring community. But, you know, the end result is this is proof that change is just incredibly hard for some people."

There were 1,302 votes cast in the plebiscite, with 663 people in favour and 639 opposed.

Kramer said the town of 4,800 will continue to find ways to embrace marginalized groups, including those in the LGBTQ community.

He has spoken with members of the local gay-straight alliance to think of ideas, he said. The group painted the town's first Pride crosswalk last year.

"It's been difficult for them because they did everything right in getting that crosswalk approved."

Last year, a group brought a petition to council demanding neutrality in public spaces after the crosswalk was painted.

Related video: Westlock bans Pride flags, rainbow crosswalks after tight vote (Global News)
Duration 2:10  View on Watch

The petition went before council, and councillors were given the choice to pass the bylaw or refer it to a plebiscite. They decided residents should vote on it.

The move can't be undone by council unless a future plebiscite is held and calls for the ban to be rescinded, Kramer said.

The Westlock Neutrality Team, a group that spearheaded the petition, did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the vote.

Kristopher Wells, the Canada Research Chair in the Public Understanding of Sexual and Gender Minority Youth, said the results are disappointing.

He said he worries for the youth who helped paint the crosswalk.

"People who voted for the removal of this crosswalk don't realize that this doesn't mean the removal of LGBTQ people in their community," Wells said.

"In some ways, this is only going to strengthen the resolve of the community and of city council to increase their support."

















Wells said there's an anti-LGBTQ movement sweeping across Canada, pointing to governments that have recently made policies affecting transgender people.

The United Conservative Party government in Alberta said it plans to introduce plans in the fall that require parental consent when students 15 and under want to change their name or pronouns at school. Students who are 16 and 17 would not need consent, but their parents would have to be notified.


The province also plans to restrict gender affirmation treatments, instruction on gender and sexuality in school, and the participation of transgender women in sports.

Similarly, Saskatchewan and New Brunswick have made rules that prevent children under 16 from changing their names or pronouns at school without parental consent.

"It is the 2SLGBTQ community that is in the crosshairs of hate and prejudice," Wells said.

Janis Irwin, Alberta Opposition NDP critic for LGBTQ issues, said she stands behind those affected by the vote in Westlock.

"The fight for a safe, inclusive Alberta continues. We can’t back down. We won’t," Irwin wrote on the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter.

Kramer said he's always viewed rainbow crosswalks as bringing people together, even though some in Westlock saw it as dividing the community.

"There's some difficult conversations, there's some pushback, there's some frustration. But when you know you're on the right path, you don't waver," he said.

Kramer said Westlock has found ways to include people, such as adding ramps for those in wheelchairs and building an accessible playground. There's also a new Filipino story time at the library, he added.

"We're in a place where we cannot do crosswalks, we can't do flags. But inclusion is a deeply creative act. So at the end of the day, we're not out of options."

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 23, 2024.

-- By Jeremy Simes in Regina

The Canadian Press



Are we looking at the first mass market ROBOT? Jeff Bezos, Nvidia, Microsoft and others pour $700million into robotics company whose humanoid machine could 'alleviate worker shortages'

Story by Matthew Phelan Senior Science Reporter For Dailymail.Com • 
  • Figure AI says it wants to mass produce 'a humanoid that can actually be useful'
  • Big names in tech - Intel, Nvidia and Samsung - have invested in Figure's plan
  • READ MORE: Cyborg dogs and bionic faces unveiled at World Robot Conference

The biggest names in tech — from Amazon to Microsoft — have poured roughly $675 million dollars in a robotics start-up whose 'master plan' is to bring the first commercial 'humanoid' to market, powered by AI.

The funding round is nearly ten times as much as the $70 million that this new robotics firm, Figure AI, managed to raise last May.

Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, through his venture firm Explore Investments LLC, pledged an optimistic $100 million to the company, with Microsoft investing nearly as much, $95 million.

Figure AI hopes that its first AI humanoid robot, Figure 01, will prove capable at jobs too dangerous for human laborers and might alleviate worker shortages. 

For now, the humanoid machine has proven itself adept at making a cup of coffee. 

Figure AI hopes that its first AI humanoid robot, Figure 01, will prove capable at jobs too dangerous for human laborers and might alleviate worker shortages. Amazon's Jeff Bezos has pledged $100 million, with Microsoft investing nearly as much, $95 million, into Figure

We hope that we're one of the first groups to bring to market a humanoid,' Figure AI's CEO Brett Adcock told reporters last May, 'that can actually be useful and do commercial activities.'

A little more than six months after that $70 million funding round last May, Figure AI announced a first-of-its-kind deal to put Figure 01 to work on BMW's factory floors.  

The German automaker entered an agreement to use Figure 01 humanoids first at a BMW plant in Spartanburg, South Carolina — a sprawling multi-billion dollar facility that includes high-voltage battery assembly and electric vehicle manufacturing.

READ MORE: Tesla robot ATTACKS an engineer at company's Texas factory during violent malfunction - leaving 'trail of blood'

An attorney aiding contract laborers at the factory now tells DailyMail.com that there's evidence Tesla appears to have under-reported accidents and deaths to govt. authorities 

While the announcement was light on details regarding the bots precise job duties at BMW, the companies described their intention to 'explore advanced technology topics' as part of their 'milestone-based approach' approach to collaborating.

On the agenda for Figure AI and BMW, the two firms said, were 'artificial intelligence, robot control, manufacturing virtualization and robot integration,' business speak for science fiction-levels of advanced automation.

Adcock told Axios that, in his opinion, Figure AI's robots 'can do basically everything a human can.'

Whether these boasts prove true, Figure has caught the attention of hundreds of millions in venture capital promising to produce the ultimate, automated worker.

Graphics chip-maker Nvidia has invested $50 million to the cause, as has an Amazon.com Inc.-affiliated venture fund.

Intel Corp, the name-brand maker of high-speed microprocessors, has put $25 million into Figure AI. Mobile phone giant Samsung has pledged $5 million. And South Korea's LG Innotek has invested $8.5 million.

But these major tech firms are not the only interested parties vying for a piece of the robot-worker future that Figure is promising: many more millions are also coming direct from the VCs themselves.

READ MORE: 'World's first ROBOT CEO' speaks to MailOnline about what its like to head up a Colombian rum company 

Mika, who heads up the Colombian spirits firm Dictador, believes that more CEOs just like her will soon crop up around the world as AI blends into businesses 

Parkway Venture Capital, which ran Figure AI's funding round last May is investing now committed $100 million to the humanoid robot start-up.

Align Ventures — past funders of Airbnb, SpaceX and Epic Games — will provide $90 million.

And according to Bloomberg, about $67 million more will be coming from a constellation of other VC firms.

Within the finance and tech, sources told the business publication, Figure AI carries a 'pre-money valuation' (meaning the start-up's inherent value before these recent $657 million in investments) of roughly $2 billion.

Figure AI's proprietary technology and potential has been such a desired commodity in Silicon Valley that OpenAI had, at one point, considered buying up the whole start-up.

Now, with $5 million invested in Figure, the makers of ChatGPT are simply one more tech player betting on the firm. 

Interest from Microsoft and its colleagues at OpenAI are believed to have played a role in inspiring the frenzy around Figure, which had originally hoped to secure $500 million during this recent funding round: $175 million less than the outpouring of investor interest it received.  

Figure's CEO, Adcock, framed the company's goals as filling a void for industry in terms of alleged worker shortages involving tricky, skilled labor that conventional automation techniques have proven unable to correct. 

'We need humanoid [robots] in the real world, doing real work,' Adcock told Axios. 

'There's just a lot of work in these facilities that's really hard to automate,' he said, 'being mobile on the floors, being dexterous. There's a lot of work we can do.'



Robot to recover treasure worth billions from legendary shipwreck


Colombia's government on Friday announced an expedition to remove items of "incalculable value" from the wreck of the legendary San Jose galleon, which sank in 1708 while laden with gold, silver and emeralds estimated to be worth billions of dollars. The 316-year-old wreck, often called the "holy grail" of shipwrecks, has been controversial, because it is both an archaeological and economic treasure.

CBS News
Gold coins found in centuries-old shipwrecks off Colombia
Duration 0:53 View on Watch

Culture Minister Juan David Correa told AFP that more than eight years after the discovery of the wreck off Colombia's coast, an underwater robot would be sent to recover some of its bounty.

Between April and May, the robot would extract some items from "the surface of the galleon" to see "how they materialize when they come out (of the water) and to understand what we can do" to recover the rest of the treasures, said Correa.

The operation will cost more than $4.5 million and the robot will work at a depth of 600 meters to remove items such as ceramics, pieces of wood and shells "without modifying or damaging the wreck," Correa told AFP aboard a large naval ship.

The location of the expedition is being kept secret to protect what is considered one of the greatest archaeological finds in history from malicious treasure hunters.

The San Jose galleon was owned by the Spanish crown when it was sunk by the British navy near Cartagena in 1708. Only a handful of its 600-strong crew survived.



The Spanish San Jose Galleon sunk in the Caribbean in 1708 after a battle with the British. New data suggests such shipwrecks could reveal the history of hurricanes in the region. / Credit: Samuel Scott© Provided by CBS News

"It makes it very touchy because one is not supposed to intervene in war graves," Justin Leidwanger, an archaeologist at Stanford University who studies ancient shipwrecks, told Live Science.

The ship had been heading back from the New World to the court of King Philip V of Spain, laden with treasures such as chests of emeralds and some 200 tons of gold coins.


Before Colombia announced the discovery in 2015, it was long sought after by treasure hunters.
"As if we were in colonial times"

The discovery of the galleon sparked a tug-of-war over who gets custody of its bounty.

Spain insists that the bounty is theirs since it was aboard a Spanish ship, while Bolivia's Qhara Qhara nation says it should get the treasures as the Spanish forced the community's people to mine the precious metals.


Colombian Rear-admiral Herman Ricardo Leon (L) and Colombian Director of Anthropologic and History Institute Alhena Caicido deliver a press conference at the Navy Museum in Cartagena, Colombia, on February 23, 2024. / Credit: LUIS ACOSTA/AFP via Getty Images© Provided by CBS News

Since Thursday, Spain's ambassador to Colombia Joaquin de Aristegui, and representatives of Bolivia's Indigenous people have been taking part in a symposium with experts to discuss the best way to access the treasure.

The government of leftist president Gustavo Petro, in power since 2022, wants to use the country's own resources to recover the wreck and ensure it remains in Colombia.


De Aristegui said he has instructions to offer Colombia a "bilateral agreement" on the protection of the wreck.

Correa said Bolivia's Indigenous people have expressed their willingness to work with Petro's government.

The idea is "to stop considering that we are dealing with a treasure that we have to fight for as if we were in colonial times, with the pirates who disputed these territories," he added.

The expedition to start recovering the shipwreck's trove comes as a case is underway at the UN's Permanent Court of Arbitration between Colombia and the U.S.-based salvage company Sea Search Armada -- which claims it found the wreck first over 40 years ago.

The company is demanding $10 billion dollars, half the wreck's estimated value today.

In June 2022, Colombia said that a remotely operated vehicle reached 900 meters below the surface of the ocean, showing new images of the wreckage.


The video showed the best-yet view of the treasure that was aboard the San Jose — including gold ingots and coins, cannons made in Seville in 1655 and an intact Chinese dinner service.

At the time, Reuters reported the remotely operated vehicle also discovered two other shipwrecks in the area, including a schooner thought to be from about two centuries ago.


This undated image made from a mosaic of photos taken by an autonomous underwater vehicle, released by the Colombian Institute of Anthropology and History, shows the remains of the Spanish galleon San Jose, that went down off the Colombian Caribbean coast more than 300 years ago. / Credit: / AP© Provided by CBS News

 Werner Herzog Watched 30 Minutes of ‘Barbie' and Asked: ‘Could It Be That the World of Barbie Is Sheer Hell?'



© Provided by Variety

Legendary director Werner Herzog was asked by Piers Morgan on the latter's "Uncensored" talk show to weigh in on the "Barbenheimer" phenomenon, but Herzog was no expert on the matter. The "Grizzly Man" and "Aguirre, the Wrath of God" filmmaker never got around to seeing Christopher Nolan's atomic bomb epic, and he seemed to be chilled to the bone after watching only 30 minutes of Greta Gerwig's blockbuster Mattel comedy.

"I have not seen ‘Oppenheimer' yet, but I will do it. ‘Barbie,' I managed to see the first half-hour," Herzog said. "I was curious and I wanted to watch it because I was curious. And I still don't have an answer, but I have a suspicion – could it be that the world of Barbie is sheer hell? For a movie ticket, as an audience, you can witness sheer hell, as close as it gets."

Herzog did not elaborate, but it sounds like he was not criticizing Gerwig's movie and instead theorizing that Barbie Land in the film and living in Barbie Land is "sheer hell."

"I don't know yet, Piers Morgan, give me a moment to watch the whole thing," Herzog said. "I have to watch the whole thing first."

"Trust me, let me spare you the horror," Morgan fired back. "I watched the whole thing and it is hell. I completely concur with your initial assessment after half an hour. And I would definitely recommend you don't put yourself through the rest of it."

Herzog is the latest director to make headlines by speaking about "Barbie." Oliver Stone went viral last month when critical comments he made to City A.M. about Gerwig's movie last summer resurfaced online.

"Ryan Gosling is wasting his time if he's doing that shit for money," Stone said. "He should be doing more serious films. He shouldn't be a part of this infantilization of Hollywood. Now it's all fantasy, fantasy, fantasy, including all the war pictures: fantasy, fantasy."

Stone latter issued an apology on social media, saying he "had little to no knowledge" of the "Barbie" movie when he made his original comments. He eventually watched the movie and "appreciated the film for its originality and its themes."

"I found the filmmakers' approach certainly different than what I expected. I apologize for speaking ignorantly," Stone added at the time. "'Barbie's' box office greatly boosted the morale of our business, which was welcome. I wish Greta and the entire ‘Barbie' team good fortune at the Oscars."

"Barbie" is up for eight Oscars this year, including best picture.

What is Chlormequat? Potentially harmful pesticide found in Cheerios and Quaker Oats



Farming© Unsplash


Chlormequat, a chemical potentially linked to health risks, has been found in oat-based cereals like Cheerios and Quaker Oats in the US.

recent study published by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) found that 80 per cent of human urine samples collected from the US population between 2017 and 2023 contained the chemical.

The study highlighted that the concentration of samples that contained chlormequat collected in 2023 was “significantly higher” than in previous years.

Chlormequat is a pesticide that’s actually been banned from use on most edible plants in the United States.

However, the recent findings have prompted concern about the potential health risks that the chemical may pose.

Regulation about the use of pesticides varies between the US and other countries.

There has been no evidence of chlormequat being detected in UK-sold cereals. However, the same report claims that chlormequat has been found in UK oat samples in the past.

What is chlormequat?

Farming practices around the world usually rely on a number of pesticides and chemicals while growing produce.

Chlormequat is a chemical that is used as a plant-growth regulator to support farming processes.

When the pesticide is applied to growing grains and oats, it helps prevent the plants from bending and can limit growth. This helps farmers when it comes to harvesting crops.

Although it was restricted from use in the US on edible plants, imported foods that have been treated with chlormequat are allowed to enter the country. The Environmental Protection Agency is also proposing to allow the use of chlormequat on other US products.

What are the side effects of chlormequat?

Initial studies on animals have determined that chlormequat can alter and damage the reproductive systems and developing fetuses.

However, there hasn’t been much research about the impact this may have on humans.

According to the recently released study, the toxicity data the scientists discovered “raise concerns about current exposure levels, and warrant more expansive toxicity testing, food monitoring, and epidemiological studies to assess health effects of chlormequat exposures in humans”.

Is chlormequat in breakfast cereals?

As chlormequat is often detected in food crops such as oats, wheat, and barley, there’s concern that the pesticide can be found in breakfast cereals.

Given that chlormequat has been detected in human urine in the United States, there’s strong evidence that the pesticide is found in some foods consumed by humans.

US-based research conducted in May 2023 found chlormequat in 92 per cent of oat-based foods, including Cheerios and Quaker Oats, according to CBS.

Speaking to People magazine, the manufacturers of these cereals maintained that their food products meet regulatory requirements.

"All our products adhere to all regulatory requirements," a spokesperson for the manufacturers of Cheerio’s told the outlet. "Food safety is always our top priority at General Mills, and we take care to ensure our food is prepared and packaged in the safest way possible."

Quaker Foods also told People: "At Quaker, we stand by the safety and quality of our products. We have a comprehensive food-safety management system in place. We adhere to all regulatory guidelines to ensure the safest, highest quality products for our consumers."

Cheerios in the UK are actually manufactured by Nestlé, a different brand from the US manufacturer General Mills. As this study had a US focus, there’s no evidence of chlormequat being detected in UK-sold Cheerios and Quaker Oats.

A representative for Nestlé and Quaker Oats has been approached by the Evening Standard for comment.

However, chlormequat has been identified in UK ingredients in the past few years.

A report published by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) in 2022 stated that six samples of organic porridge oats that had been tested contained chlormequat.

Register now for one of the Evening Standard’s newsletters. From a daily news briefing to Homes & Property insights, plus lifestyle, going out, offers and more. For the best stories in your inbox, click here.

New Wave of Accusations Ignites MeToo Reckoning in France: ‘Women Are Fed Up. The Anger Is Enormous'


© Provided by Variety

 French film industry 'has a culture of power imbalance' (France 24)

France's film industry is undergoing a new MeToo reckoning, dominating news cycles, policy debates and even the goodie bag of the Cesar Awards' nominees dinner, which included a flyer headlined, "The cultural sector together against sexist and sexual violence."

The French #MeToo movement also made its way into the Berlinale, where actor Nora Hamzawi said that director Jacques Doillon's upcoming film "Third Grade" - in which Hamzawi stars - shouldn't be released due to the sexual misconduct allegations recently filed against the filmmkaker.

France's major producers guilds (API, SPI and UPC) have also issued a statement demanding the National Film Board (CNC) and the Minister of Culture to put specific guidelines in place. Those demands include the appointment of "experts specialized in the prevention and management of sexual violence to set up a safe environment at the start of every shoot;" additional resources for organizations fighting sexual misconduct; and setting up an insurance policy that would allow productions to immediately halt when a situation of sexual violence arises.

The subject will likely be prominent at Friday's Cesar Awards ceremony, where Judith Godrèche - the actor who has charged this new MeToo reckoning with her revelations that she had been preyed upon and groomed as a minor by directors Benoît Jacquot and Jacques Doillon - is expected to make a speech.

Godrèche's allegations are among several new sexual assault complaints filed in recent weeks. The new reckoning really kicked off in early December with the airing of an investigative documentary showing Gerard Depardieu making derogatory and sexualized comments about a pre-adolescent girl.

Since then, Anna Mouglalis, Isild le Besco, Vahina Giocante, and Julia Roy have stepped forward with new allegations against Doillon and Jacquot, while Godrèche herself has pushed the reckoning further by pressing charges against the two directors. She has also launched a social media campaign encouraging even more victims to speak up. Besides Doillon and Jacquot, a third director who is also in his 70s, Philippe Garrel, has also been accused of sexual assault by five actresses who spoke to Mediapart in September.

"I am here," Godrèche posted on Instagram on February 10, asking readers to submit their own stories to the email address MoiaussiJudith@gmail.com("MeTooJudith@gmail.com"). "Behind this account, [I am] ready to read and reflect on a project in your honor. However were you abused, please share as soon as possible."

The post has received more than 10,000 likes over the past week.

"Women are really fed up," says author and critic Hélène Frappat. "The intensity of this response displays the full extent of this pent up anger that up until now had not been measured – and clearly that anger is enormous."

Three days after Godrèche's Instagram outreach, Frappat published an Op-Ed in Le Monde situating this climate of predation within a wider, retrograde pathology. "This worldview is built on a scam," wrote Frappat. "A scam for women, not the for these so-called great creators who defend themselves by explaining that in France of the Nouvelle Vague a director must sleep with his muse in order to find inspiration. [In other words] our romantic vision is built on harassment." 

"I think many of these directors sincerely believe that such harassment, which can lead all the way to sexual assault, are products of [a romantic instinct]," she tells Variety.  "And that in turn, they feel their victims should be happy for such attention…Only we shouldn't fall into the trap of isolating cinema, because cinema is a just a blown-up image of society – and this issue affects our society on every level."

As Frappat's op-ed and Godrèche's online initiative continue to spark debate across French culture and media, organizations like Collective 50/50 now lead the charge in reshaping the audiovisual sector. Founded in 2018 under the moniker 50/50 For 2020, the activist organization has since rebranded with a wider and more ambitious goal in mind.


Collective 50/50's 2023 Conference For Equality, Parity and Diversity in Cinema.© Provided by Variety

"When the collective was created, we didn't think it would still exist in 2024," says 50/50 general secretary Laura Pertuy. "We were perhaps too optimistic, thinking and hoping that it would dissolve very quickly. But we now see that there's a colossal amount of progress to be made."

Instead, the collective has assumed a wider and intersectional point of view, encouraging parity in film festival selections by fighting for a healthier sector. The fight amounts to a full-scale rethinking of traditionally held mores – including the impunity conferred upon selected auteurs.

"We've created a terrible system, one we're now struggling to dismantle," says Pertuy. "A system that views those who create as all-powerful beings, unable to be questioned. That system encouraged a habit of not speaking up, of not being heard [because] those at the top needed to be listened to and admired at all costs."

"There's this old, imaginary world around [actors like] Depardieu and certain directors," Pertuy continues. "One gets the impression that it's more painful to separate oneself from this imaginary world than to hear the complaints, the pain or even the anger of women who have been sexually assaulted. There's a kind of blame reversal at work, which is a bit strange."

Because the film industry adheres to the same norms that govern modern life, it should come as no surprise that conferring absolute power and absolute deference on a select few can have an absolutely corrosive effect. With that in mind, Pertuy's organization has lobbied France's National Film Board (CNC) to mandate obligatory harassment prevention seminars for full casts and crews ahead of each shoot.

"This obligation, the fact of uniting and thinking about the shoot together, creates a certain atmosphere that helps deconstruct the concept of the director-king and the pyramidal organization built around them," says Pertuy. "In fact, addressing the full crew on the same level can significantly reduce violence on set."

At the same time, the CNC's work with 50/50 reflects a paradox of the current fight against harassment and the extent of the challenge ahead. 50/50's previous board resigned en masse following a sexual assault complaint and scandal in 2022, while CNC president Dominique Boutonnat still has open sexual assault charges against him. In December, President Emmanuel Macron defended Depardieu in a TV interview, saying the actor "made France proud," while the media pushback against directors Jacques Doillon and Benoit Jacquot has not yet impeded the filmmakers' upcoming work.

Doillon's latest feature, "Third Grade," has won the acclaim of First Lady Brigitte Macron and is confirmed for release in France next month, while Jacquot's Georges Simenon adaptation "Belle" – which stars Charlotte Gainsbourg and Guillaume Canet – is finishing post-production and was recently up for sale at Berlin's EFM. A source close to the market tells Variety that Jacquot's film has already sold to more than a dozen territories, while the filmmaker's scandal-tarnished image has not traveled as far beyond France's borders.

All that goes to show that the outrage newly voiced across the French industry is the beginning of a process, not the end of a chapter.

"In the face of such systemic violence, we must question the status quo that views certain actors and directors as kings," says Pertuy. "We have a clear obligation to stand up and speak out, to say we will no longer be attacked, we are no longer invisible, and we don't want to hide. That's where the revolution lies."      

 

Manitoba PCs gave 'incomplete' picture of financial challenges before election: report

NDP Finance Minister Adrien Sala accuses the Tories of misleading the public

Manitoba Finance Minister Adrien Sala said the third-party report demonstrates the former PC government made questionable spending choices in its final months in office. 'Reckless' decisions of previous government hidden from Manitobans: finance minister | Watch (msn.com)

Manitoba's former Progressive Conservative government presented an incomplete picture of the province's financial pressures, had aggressive energy-revenue assumptions and made significant spending commitments in the months leading up to the provincial election, says a consultant's report released Friday.

"From the release of the 2023-2024 budget to Oct. 3, 2023, budgetary decisions were made that collectively represent high budgetary risk," says the review by consulting firm MNP.

The review was ordered by the incoming NDP government shortly after the Oct. 3 election. In December, the government said the deficit was on track to end up at $1.6 billion — more than quadruple the original number in the spring budget and the highest shortfall in the province's history outside of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The report found instances where the Tory government appeared over-optimistic on revenues.

The Tory budget predicted a large surplus at Manitoba Hydro. And even as drought conditions caused power-generating water levels to drop sharply, the government did not reflect the change in its first quarter fiscal update in the summer. There was a caution of uncertainty about Hydro's profits given the weather but no new dollar figure.

The Tory government also assumed tax revenues would remain stable, even though it was cutting income taxes and facing a possible economic downturn, the report says.

No budgeting for health-care recruitment

It also promised in July to spend $200 million to hire more health-care workers, says the report, but it did not include the figure in its quarterly fiscal update issued the next day.

"It would have been reasonable to expect the government to have included this in the 2023-2024 first quarter report and fiscal economic update released the next day on July 28, 2023, but it was absent."

The Tories had also opened up the purse strings, boosting spending in their last budget by almost 10 per cent from the previous year, the report says.

On Friday, Finance Minister Adrien Sala accused the Tories of having misled the public in the election campaign.

"In an election year, they were desperate to hang on to power," Sala said.

The Tories rejected the report's findings.

"This is a political document with unaudited figures and incomplete information. The NDP neglected to mention that they are in charge for half of this budget's fiscal year," Tory finance critic Obby Khan said in a statement.

Despite the larger deficit and the report's findings, the NDP government committed to maintain income tax cuts that were in the Tory budget and took effect last month.

The cuts include raising personal income tax brackets and are expected to cost the treasury $486 million annually. The NDP promised during the election campaign it would follow through on that part of the Tory budget.

"Our commitments were clear on this, and we're planning on delivering on our commitments," Sala said Friday.

He also wouldn't say if the government would rein in its spending.

Previous Manitoba government made questionable spending decisions: consultant

13 hours ago
Duration2:05
A third-party review, commissioned by the current NDP government, concluded the former PC government made spending decisions in its final months in power that represented a 'high budgetary risk.'

With files from CBC News


JUST SAY NO 
Alberta regulator accepts Rockies coal mine application, will call public hearing


Alberta's energy regulator has accepted initial applications and is to open public hearings for a controversial open-pit coal mine on the eastern slopes of the province's southern Rocky Mountains that has already been turned down twice.

In an internal letter dated Thursday, the Alberta Energy Regulator says it made its decision after receiving "clarification" from Energy Minister Brian Jean about whether or not Northback's Grassy Mountain proposal should be exempted from a moratorium on coal development on those landscapes.

"The (regulator) has accepted the ... applications from Northback and has determined they should be decided by a panel of hearing commissioners," the letter says.

The news was welcomed by Blair Painter, mayor of the nearby community of Crowsnest Pass.

"It's good news for the community," he said.

"It would give us a really good industrial base. We view it as a great opportunity."

Area landowners and ranchers weren't as pleased.

"Our immediate reaction is one of great frustration and disappointment," said Bobbi Lambright of the Livingstone Landowners Group.

"It's pretty clear that this is a political rather than a regulatory decision."

The Grassy Mountain proposal, the site of significant mining in the past, has been before regulators for years. The steelmaking coal project was judged not in the public interest in 2021, after a long environmental review by a joint federal-provincial panel, and its permits were denied by both levels of government.

But the proposal was included on a list of so-called "advanced projects" exempted from a 2022 ministerial order that banned coal development in the Rockies, issued after a loud public outcry over a staking rush on those lands.

In September, the project was revived under the name Northback. Northback has applied for drilling and exploration permits and a water diversion licence and argues that it remains exempt from the order.

Opponents argue the project lost its advanced status when governments turned it down and that the regulator shouldn't consider the new applications.

"It's legally dead," Nigel Bankes, a University of Calgary emeritus professor of resource law, said in a blog post. "It's an ex-project."

In a November letter to the regulator, Energy Minister Brian Jean said once a project, always a project.


"Once a project is considered an advanced project it remains as one regardless of the outcome of regulatory applications submitted before it was declared an advanced project," he wrote. "It is my expectation that the (regulator) will review any applications related to these advanced coal projects."

That's what the regulator says it will do.

"A letter from the minister of energy clarifying the application of the (ministerial order) ... carries significant weight," says the regulator's Thursday letter.

It instructs its hearing commissioner to strike a panel to consider Northback's applications. It's not clear yet how that panel would operate or who would be eligible to appear before it.

There is likely to be significant interest.

A letter from Northback's lawyers to the regulator says 43 statements of support have been received. The regulator's website shows 83 objections to the drilling application.

It may not get that far. Katie Morrison of the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society said her group is considering a legal challenge to the regulator's ruling that a proposal killed by two levels of government can still count as an advanced project.

"(The regulator) is missing the point," she said.

"This isn't a project that should be going through the regulator. It should not be considered an advanced project."

Morrison points to widespread opposition to expanded coal mining in the Rockies that exploded after the United Conservative Party government withdrew protections in 2020 for those lands without public consultation.

"Northback is refusing to hear the 'no' that has come from the vast majority of Albertans who oppose coal," she said. "The company continues to find these wedges and loopholes."

Northback CEO Mike Young wrote in an email that the company will listen to concerns of all Canadians and government regulators.

"We look forward to learning more details on the AER panel review of our proposed exploration drilling applications and sharing how our expertise and experience will ensure this exploratory drilling program is safe and protects the valuable water resources in the region,” he wrote.

Bankes said that even if the hearing goes ahead, the project still faces its previous regulatory rejections, upheld by the Alberta Court of Appeal.

"They keep trying and trying and trying, but Northback has to undermine or get quashed both the federal decision and the provincial decision," he said.

A Federal Court ruling last week rolled back the federal rejection. But that decision only compels cabinet to complete consultations with First Nations and leaves it open for Ottawa to reject the mine again.

Meanwhile, Painter is hoping for the best.

"Northback has supported our hospital and different social entities," he said. "They've been a good corporate citizen."

Here we go again, said Lambright.

"(The project) was conclusively denied by the joint review panel, the Alberta Energy Regulator, the federal and provincial governments in a regulatory process that was one of the most extended and comprehensive of any project.

"Why are we back doing a hearing again?"


This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 23, 2024.

Bob Weber, The Canadian Press