It’s possible that I shall make an ass of myself. But in that case one can always get out of it with a little dialectic. I have, of course, so worded my proposition as to be right either way (K.Marx, Letter to F.Engels on the Indian Mutiny)
Physicists using the Large Hadron Collider have discovered a new particle - Copyright AFP/File VALENTIN FLAURAUD
The Large Hadron Collider has discovered a new particle, the 80th identified so far by the world’s most powerful particle smasher, Europe’s CERN physics laboratory announced Tuesday.
The new particle has been named “Xi-cc-plus”. Scientists hope the particle — which is similar to a proton but four times heavier — will reveal more about the strange behaviour of quantum mechanics.
All the matter around us — including the protons and neutrons that make up the nucleus of atoms — are made of baryons.
These common particles are composed of three quarks, which are fundamental building blocks of matter.
Quarks come in six “flavours”: up, down, charm, strange, top and bottom. Each has varying mass, electric charge and quantum properties.
In theory, there could be many different types of baryons that mix these flavours — however most are extremely difficult to observe.
To chase them down, the Large Hadron Collider sends particles whizzing around an underground ring at phenomenal speeds until they smash into each other.
This gives scientists a brief chance to measure how the more stable elements decay, then deduce the properties of the original particle.
The newly discovered “Xi-cc-plus” contains two “charm” quarks and one “down” quark.
Normal protons have two “up” quarks and one “down” quark. Because the new particle has two heavier “charm” quarks instead of “up” ones, it has a much greater mass.
Vincenzo Vagnoni, spokesman for the Large Hadron Collider beauty (LHCb) experiment, said it was “only the second time a baryon with two heavy quarks has been observed”.
It is also “the first new particle identified after the upgrades to the LHCb detector that were completed in 2023,” he said in a statement.
“The result will help theorists test models of quantum chromodynamics, the theory of the strong force that binds quarks into not only conventional baryons and mesons but also more exotic hadrons such as tetraquarks and pentaquarks.”
In 2017, the LHCb experiment announced that it had discovered a similar particle, made of two “charmed” quarks and one “up” quark.
The new particle has an expected lifetime six times shorter than this earlier one, making it far more tricky to spot, CERN said.
The Large Hadron Collider is a 27-kilometre (17 mile) long proton-smashing ring running about 100 metres below France and Switzerland. Mostly famously, it proved the existence of the Higgs boson — known as the “God particle” — in 2012.
The latest discovery comes as CERN plans to build an even bigger particle smasher, the Future Circular Collider, to continue probing the mysteries of the universe.
'They beat us with whips': Sudan RSF detainees tell of horrors in El-Fasher
Tawila (Sudan) (AFP) – In the suffocating darkness of a sealed shipping container, every thud signalled to Ibrahim Noureldin that one more detainee had died in the crush as Sudanese paramilitary fighters kept forcing more men inside.
Issued on: 22/03/2026 - RFI
Thousands of people are estimated to have been detained in the Rapid Support Forces' (RSF) October takeover of North Darfur's El-Fasher, a battle that a UN investigation found bore the "hallmarks of genocide".
"When people died of thirst and hunger, we were beaten and forced to bury them outside," 42-year-old Noureldin said.
"We were put to work, lifting their luggage, materials, weapons. If we moved too slowly, they beat us with whips," he told AFP from Tawila -- an overwhelmed refugee town west of El-Fasher now sheltering hundreds of thousands of people.
In February, the United Nations' rights office and the London-based Centre for Information Resilience (CIR) said that the RSF had converted hospitals, schools, warehouses and shipping containers -- like the easy-to-lock, inescapable box that nearly killed Noureldin -- into a sprawling network of makeshift prisons.
The RSF, at war with Sudan's regular army for nearly three years, has an iron grip on El-Fasher, and has only allowed in a handful of humanitarians, who say the city is "a ghost town".
But in Tawila, an AFP journalist gathered rare testimonies from five former detainees, speaking to them inside fragile shelters of straw and tattered fabric. 'Sips of water'
Under one straw awning, Noureldin leaned on a crutch, still weak from his injuries.
On October 26, he and six others were fleeing the RSF's final assault on the city when they were "shot at, beaten and accused of fighting for the army".
He was loaded into a Land Cruiser and taken to al-Borsa market in the city's east, then locked with about 120 men in the airless container.
For over a month, they survived on "tiny sips of water" and "a little lentils".
Months of testimony, satellite imagery and verified videos analysed by the UN and CIR show that the detainees included government workers, doctors, journalists, teachers and aid staff.
Many were held for ransom, accused of army affiliation or based on tribal identity.
The RSF denies the abuses. A spokesman told AFP the reports were "propaganda", accusing the army of "using civilians as human shields".
Both warring sides have been accused of atrocities against civilians, including deliberate targeting and detention. 'Nails ripped with pliers'
One of the RSF's largest detention centres was El-Fasher Children's Hospital, where "more than 2,000 men" were held "without access to water and food", the UN said.
"They brought us to the children's hospital, said we were fighters and kept me there for a month," Abdullah Idris, 45, told AFP.
With nothing but saline solution to drink, he said he "could only watch" as dozens of people died every day.
The UN recorded up to 40 deaths a day during a cholera-like outbreak, killing 260 people in a single week.
Besides disease, "the torture was horrible, especially to the young men", he said.
"If you tried to speak, they'd kill you with a single shot."
Ahmed Aman, 45, another hospital detainee, said some detainees "had their fingernails ripped out with pliers".
After weeks at the hospital, he was moved to Garni, northwest of El-Fasher, where CIR-verified footage showed "at least 600 detainees" being forcibly marched, including women and children. 'Like animals'
Nedal Yasser, 27, was abducted the day after the RSF assault on the city.
For six weeks, she was shuttled with other women between detention sites, including al-Mina al-Bary, a bus depot near the market where the UN said hundreds were held in about 70 shipping containers.
"I was beaten, tied up, interrogated. When they found out my husband was a soldier, the torture got even worse," she told AFP.
"We were exploited and sexually harassed, only sometimes allowed to go to the bathroom."
She and the other women were ordered to pay $2,000 ransoms, but everything she owned had "already been looted".
Finally, she was brought to a house, "assaulted", then dumped in a remote area.
She walked dozens of kilometres to Tawila, suffering a miscarriage on the way.
The UN has documented widespread torture and "cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment", including sexual violence, beatings with wooden rods, flogging and being suspended in painful positions from trees.
And mechanic Ahmed al-Sheikh, 43, walks with a limp and cannot see out of his right eye after being struck by an RSF fighter.
He reached safety only in February after four months in Shala prison, where the UN said the RSF held more than 2,000 detainees by January.
"They'd kill people right in front of us," he told AFP.
"They would select people randomly, killing us like animals."
According to the UN, at least 6,000 more detainees were transferred from El-Fasher to Tagris prison in the RSF's de facto capital, Nyala, where they maintain a complete communications blackout.
Rural economies in emerging markets are often fragile, and this International Growth Centre brief explores the challenges and opportunities that they face. The vast majority of emerging market commodity production is carried out by smallholder farmers who have limited plots of land and are therefore often highly vulnerable to increases in input costs, uncertainty and shocks to global commodity markets. There is a growing demand for more disclosure and sustainability in global commodity supply chains, which is also having an impact on rural areas. Improving rural futures will require action on smallholder agriculture, supply chains and finance. This brief argues that there is a role for an integrated approach to improving rural economies through the overlap of smallholder agriculture, supply chains and finance. Such an approach could deliver more sustainable, inclusive and long-term gains for rural development than current approaches.
Food and nutrition security is a global challenge that can only be met through the development of smallholder agriculture. Smallholder farmers working in food systems dominated by old fields, low yields and inadequate agricultural services face major challenges. Climate change is also introducing new factors that affect their production and exacerbating others that are already well known, such as interannual rainfall variability, increased incidence of pests and diseases, and land degradation. In addition, smallholder farmers are excluded from formal markets and financial services, primarily because of the lack of formal proof of land ownership. Limited extension services are a major factor in not having the appropriate agricultural skills to practice the recommended agricultural practices to obtain higher yields and therefore increase productivity and income. This is one of the main factors of rural youth exodus to urban areas in search of employment opportunities. Our mission is to transform the smallholder agriculture from a model of development characterised by insufficient livelihoods for the rural population, to an innovative and climate change resilient sector.
Agriculture faces many challenges, and for each of these, on the field as well as on the policy level, potential solutions have been identified. For example, clearing old crop from the field should be solved by re-planting, and this should be supported by investments in Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) technologies like seeds, soil and irrigation management. Farmer Institutions (FIs) can be strengthened by training farmers and enabling them to be powerful, for example, cooperatives and local farmer associations, in order to address fragmentation. Many agritech innovations like digital advisory tools and remote sensing have the potential to empower farmers and increase their capacity to make informed decisions, but further research is required in order to confirm their applicability in the agriculture sector.
The global supply chains for commodities that are demanded on the world market need to be transformed so that traceable and sustainable commodities can be delivered. The declarations from many of the large buyers on the principles of No-Deforestation, No-Peat, No-Exploitation (NDPE) must be translated into real action on the land. However, land-use maps are not available or reliable in many parts of rural areas and are often lacking in the land of smallholders. This lack of availability of maps makes verification of compliance with the required land use arrangements very difficult. Most smallholders do not have direct access to markets served by buyers that require adherence to forest stewardship principles. Instead, they are selling their products to traders or middlemen who may not have any formal forestry principles to adhere to. This leads to two-track forestry where there is a formal sector alongside an informal sector.
The first step on the way to meeting the sustainable living challenges we are all faced with is to guarantee that our production and supply systems are both sustainable and inclusive. Small farmers must be included in traceability systems so they are not excluded from the global market, because large buyers require sustainable products. It is also important that land use classification and verification processes are harmonised and simplified for small farmers, so that they are not overwhelmed by administrative tasks. In order to apply global standards to local realities, it will be necessary for companies, NGOs, governments and local communities to engage in multi-stakeholder dialogue. If standards are imposed without the participation of the local population, they will simply become a formal procedure and will not have an impact on rural development.
Small holder farmers are structurally excluded from access to finance due to several factors that include the length of the agricultural production cycle, lack of adequate collateral and low and unstable income. There are no compelling returns for banks to provide finance to smallholder farming due to high perceived risk. In farming, an individual deciding to plant crops can forfeit income over several years. It is therefore impossible to provide finance to meet this risk. Affordable long-term finance will be required to facilitate access to high-value agricultural products and services. Without access to affordable long term finance, the productivity of the small holder farmer is unlikely to improve significantly, and the resultant small holder farmer income and consequent vulnerability to poverty is unlikely to improve.
Agricultural Finance is a pressing issue that needs to be addressed. We need to develop and implement new and innovative forms of agricultural finance using commercial capital, impact investment and public funds. Blended finance approaches can incentivise and mitigate risks for commercial banks, and therefore increase access to banking services for farmers at affordable interest rates. Cooperatives can play a key role in this context. They provide a stable market for produce and are more efficient in the collection of produce from members. In addition, they can offer competitive interest rates on loans to their members. This can be done by providing credit on an after-sales basis and thus offering time to farmers to replant and allowing them to manage their cash flow. Long-term loans can also be provided for specific crops that require time to mature. A grace period and flexible repayment terms can also be provided to enable farmers to replant. Agritech and sustainability systems can also be linked to the financial products and services to increase the comfort level of the commercial banks and to better support the financial and sustainability needs of the farmers.
The solutions found in the 4 domains are interlinked. When farmers adopt new practices, their yields and incomes are higher, and they are less exposed to risk and therefore more bankable. Sustainable supply chains provide the right incentives to farmers to practice more sustainable agriculture. Alternative models of financing enable the transition. Each solution on its own is limited. But together, they open a sustainable pathway for the development of high-performing, inclusive and sustainable rural economies.
Small farmers must be recognised as an important part of the world commodity system because their work contributes to the maintenance of the environment and also to the economy. The main purpose of this article is to reflect on the potential of an integrated strategy to develop agriculture and rural economy, linking agricultural and climate change issues with corporate social responsibility and access to innovative financial services. This strategy aims to reinforce the rural economies so that they are able to face the challenges arising from climate change, to be competitive at an international level and to ensure that the farmers have decent living and work conditions today and tomorrow.
The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own.
ReferencesKehinde, A. D., Akinola, A., & Tijani, A. (2026). Unlocking yield potential through credit access: Insights from smallholder tomato farmers in Nigeria. Springer Nature (BMC Agriculture). Yang, Z., & Li, X. (2026). From credit access to farmers’ income resilience: Evaluating the impact of financial reform on urban–rural inequality and rural income stability. Frontiers Media (Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems).
Simon Hutagalung
Simon Hutagalung is a retired diplomat from the Indonesian Foreign Ministry and received his master's degree in political science and comparative politics from the City University of New York. The opinions expressed in his articles are his own.
Alaska Officials Step Toward Wider Oil And Gas Exploration On State Land Near Yukon River
The Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge is seen from the air
(Photo provided by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)
(Alaska Beacon) — The Alaska Department of Natural Resources has tentatively decided that oil and gas exploration should be allowed on state land in the vicinity of the Yukon River.
In a public notice published March 4, the agency said its determination for the Yukon Flats “comports with constitutional direction to encourage the development of the state’s resources, and with the legislature’s direction that it is in the state’s interest to develop the state’s oil and gas resources.”
The flats are a large area of wetlands and lowlands at the confluence of the Yukon and Porcupine rivers in Interior Alaska.
DNR’s preliminary approval is subject to a public notice process, and public comments on the agency’s position are due by April 6. They may be emailed to dog.bif@alaska.gov.
This month’s public notice comes as the oil and gas firm Hilcorp enters another year of operations in the area with Doyon Ltd., the regional Alaska Native Corp. for Interior Alaska.
Last summer, Hilcorp drilled for oil on land leased from Doyon near the village of Birch Creek, south of Fort Yukon. Doyon’s subsidiary, Doyon Drilling, conducted much of the work.
As that drilling took place, Hilcorp applied for permission to conduct oil and gas exploration on state land nearby.
Most of the surrounding territory is within the Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge, an area prized for its waterfowl nesting and breeding grounds.
Hilcorp’s permit application is on hold until the state completes the regulatory process covered by this month’s public notice.
The Yukon Flats are in what the state has colorfully labeled “Middle Earth” — a vast swath of Alaska between the North Slope and Cook Inlet that has no active oil and gas production and hasn’t been thoroughly surveyed for oil and gas.
The determination signed this month by Derek Nottingham, director of the Division of Oil and Gas, states that “the land within the Yukon Flats determination area has unknown oil and gas potential and there is limited access to existing oil and gas infrastructure in much of the region. Although oil and gas exploration has occurred in the past, technological advancements may facilitate more effective and efficient exploration. Further, the state would benefit from geological and geophysical data that may result from potential exploration.”
If the state does determine that oil and gas exploration is appropriate in the area, it would then have to go through a separate process to determine whether Hilcorp in particular should be given permission to explore.
A similar process took place in the Susitna River valley last year.
State permission in the Yukon Flats doesn’t automatically mean that a company could plop a drilling rig in the middle of the Yukon River. That kind of development plan would be subject to many different levels of regulation by several state and federal agencies.
Instead, the biggest impact is likely to be in cases where subsurface rights are split between the state and Native corporations. If an underground oil pool is beneath land with split ownership, ownership of that pool could be complicated.
An explorer working from corporate land wouldn’t have to worry about ownership issues if it also holds a permit from the state.
In Hilcorp’s case, the Birch Creek area being leased from Doyon is dotted with lakes whose bottoms could be state-owned.
Hilcorp has not yet announced its plans for the summer 2026 season. Last year, it had plans to drill two exploration wells but ended up drilling only one, according to data published by the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission.
That well stopped work in October, but significant amounts of equipment, including a drill rig, remain on site at Birch Creek.
Sarah Obed, a spokeswoman for Doyon, said by email that the company will be sharing an update with shareholders soon and is grateful for local residents’ collaboration on the project.
“As always, Hilcorp and Doyon will prioritize shareholder employment when opportunities arise and will continue to work closely with partners and our communities through this upcoming season and beyond,” she wrote by email.
Alaska Beacon
Alaska Beacon is an independent, nonpartisan news organization focused on connecting Alaskans to their state government. Alaska, like many states, has seen a decline in the coverage of state news. We aim to reverse that.
EU wants to tap citizens’ savings. Easier said than done
The EU wants a more integrated financial market to finance its all-important green and digital transitions - Copyright AFP/File Kirill KUDRYAVTSEV
Raziye Akkoc
The idea sounds simple: tap trillions of euros of EU citizens’ savings to unlock capital for European companies through a more integrated financial market.
Getting over the finish line, however, has been complicated, with EU states unable to agree and the idea languishing for years.
More than a decade after the European Union first floated the idea of a deeper capital market, the issue has come roaring back into the spotlight — and with it the type of concern that dogged previous efforts.
The renewed impetus stems from fears the EU is lagging dangerously behind the world’s two biggest economies, the United States and China — one of the topics set to dominate a summit of the bloc’s leaders this week.
Some, including European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, have raised the prospect of several EU states moving forward, leaving others behind, to establish a Savings and Investments Union.
A key element of such a union is centralising market supervision, an issue pitting the EU’s six biggest economies against smaller countries.
France, Germany, Italy and three others say the move is necessary, but Luxembourg and Ireland have expressed reservations.
The topic will be discussed in depth when EU leaders meet Thursday.
But what really does the EU want, and can it be achieved?
– What is the plan? –
The idea first appeared as the “Capital Markets Union” when then-president of the commission Jean-Claude Juncker raised it in 2014.
Now the EU prefers the phrase “Savings and Investments Union” — which combines the Capital Markets Union and the Banking Union.
Brussels wants to unify national financial markets to make investments flow more seamlessly across the EU.
The commission also wants markets to provide more attractive financial instruments to European citizens, who are more fearful of investing in stock markets than their American counterparts.
Currently, 10 trillion euros ($11.6 trillion) of EU citizens’ savings are held as bank deposits, according to the bloc’s executive, because people see it as safe.
The reform push is also about giving better access to money for businesses.
By harmonising financial markets and getting rid of the fragmentation that hinders pooling vast capital, there could be much bigger sums available for scale-ups and infrastructure, experts say.
“That is one of the key disadvantages the EU is facing compared to the US and China,” said analyst Philipp Lausberg of the European Policy Centre think tank.
– Why is this a hot topic again? –
Europe needs money — lots of it.
A landmark 2024 report estimated the EU’s additional investment needs at 750 billion to 800 billion euros annually.
The EU needs to plough more money into its digital and green transitions as well as defence, faced with rising global instability.
Leaders are keen to move fast.
They agreed in February they wanted “to be done with phase one of the Savings and Investment Union, that includes the market integration, the supervision and the securitisation, by June”, von der Leyen said.
Without “sufficient progress”, she warned willing EU states would press on alone.
Under EU rules, at least nine countries could go full steam ahead on the project without others.
– Is it popular? –
In theory, member states all support the idea.
In practice, there are strong divisions over how it should look.
A group of countries known as “E6” — France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands and Poland — want the Paris-based European Securities and Markets Authority to become the EU’s supervisor of large stock exchanges.
Irish Finance Minister Simon Harris recommended “enhancing” its role instead.
The business community supports the Savings and Investments Union, including Europe’s biggest organisation representing firms, BusinessEurope.
Others, while welcoming deeper financial markets, are more cautious.
Julia Symon, head of research and advocacy at NGO Finance Watch, said key barriers need to be removed if Europe wants a “regime comparable to the US, currently the main destination of EU private capital outflows”.
This would mean “joint supervision, harmonised insolvency and greater tax coherence, which go far beyond what is currently proposed”, she told AFP.
“The goal should not be to expand finance for its own sake, but to ensure that finance serves long-term economic resilience and productive investment.”\
COP28 To COP30: Nuclear Energy In The Climate Equation – OpEd
COP30 in Brazil. Photo Credit: RICARDO STUCKERT, ABr
Nuclear energy is becoming a central pillar in global plans to address climate change and also gaining importance as countries seek low-carbon climate solutions. The Conference of the Parties (COP30) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), was held in Belem, Brazil, in November 2025. The COP30 has been widely described as a “COP of Implementation” due to its emphasis on bringing existing initiatives into action than on new climate pledges. While the summit produced important agreement on adoption of mechanism for adaptation finance to track climate actions, one of its consequential developments was the reinforcement of role of nuclear energy in the global climate strategy.
In December 2023, during the COP28 held in Dubai, 25 countries including Armenia, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Finland, France, Ghana, Hungary, Jamaica, Japan, Moldova, Mongolia, Morocco, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Korea, Sweden, Ukraine, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States signed the Declaration to Triple Nuclear Energy by 2050. The initiative gained further momentum at subsequent climate summits, with six additional countries including Kazakhstan, Kenya, El Salvador, Kosovo, Nigeria and Turkiye joining at COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, and two more countries including Rwanda and Senegal at COP30, bringing the total to 33 countries.
The COP28 Declaration to Triple Nuclear Energy underscores the essential role of nuclear energy in achieving global net-zero Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions by 2050, a prerequisite for keeping the 1.5 °C temperature-limit target within reach. It also highlights nuclear power’s contribution to energy security through supply of clean, reliable, and affordable source of electricity.
Beyond government commitments, strong support has also emerged from industry and finance for tripling nuclear energy. According to the World Nuclear Outlook Report presented at COP28, 130 nuclear-sector companies signed a pledge backing the tripling objectives. This was followed by New York Climate Week 2024, where 14 financial institutions publicly expressed support and explored ways in which the financial sector could facilitate nuclear expansion. Further endorsement came at Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA) Week observed in Houston, Texas in March 2025, where 14 major energy-consuming companies voiced their backing for tripling global nuclear capacity by mid-century.
According to the World Nuclear Outlook Report 2025 presented at COP30, global energy demand is increasing in order to meet the needs of populations with insufficient access to energy and electricity. Approximately 750 million people currently lack access to electricity, and emerging economies require significantly more power to support development. This rising demand is driven by a growing global population, which stands at approximately 8 billion today and is projected to increase to 9.8 billion by 2050 and 11.2 billion by 2100. At the same time, global GHG emissions continue to rise due to increasing energy demand.
International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that 2025 reached a record of 38.1 billion tonnes of CO2. This rise is largely driven by continued growth in coal, oil, and gas consumption, particularly in emerging economies and high-demand regions. The upward trend poses a serious challenge to efforts to limit global warming to below 1.5 °C under the Paris Agreement.
According to the World Nuclear Association, the capacity target outlined in the Declaration to Triple Nuclear Energy is anchored to 2020 levels, when global operable nuclear capacity stood at 393 GWe produced by 441 nuclear reactors. Tripling this figure would require nearly 1,200 GWe of operational capacity by 2050.
According to the World Nuclear Outlook Report 2025, 177 reactors have an operating lifetime of 60 years, while 203 reactors are expected to receive lifetime extensions to 80 years. In addition, 75 reactors are currently under construction, 103 reactors are planned, 295 reactors have been proposed, and 24 reactors are considered potential projects. To meet the national targets, 538 additional nuclear capacity units would be required. If these targets are achieved, global nuclear capacity could reach 1,428 GWe by 2050.
According to the World Nuclear Association Reactor Data 2025, the global nuclear power sector is largely shaped by large-scale reactors. As of October 2025, a total of 438 nuclear reactors were in operation worldwide, providing combined capacity of 397 GWe. Pressurized Water Reactors (PWRs) dominate the operating fleet, representing over 70% of all reactors. Boiling Water Reactors (BWRs) account for 14%, while Pressurized Heavy Water Reactors (PHWRs) make up 11%. Light-Water Graphite-Moderated Reactors (LWGRs) and Gas-Cooled Reactors (GCRs) represent about 2% of the total, respectively. Only two Fast Neutron Reactors (FNRs) and one High-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR) are currently operational.
During COP30, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) hosted its Atoms4Climate and Atoms4Net Zero Pavilions and underscored the role of nuclear energy and technologies in addressing climate mitigation, adaptation, and decarbonization. IAEA’s key priorities include innovative financing mechanisms, the deployment of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), and the use of nuclear applications in agriculture, food security, and environmental monitoring.
During its participation in COP30, Pakistan underscored the extreme climate vulnerability of the country, despite its contribution of less than one percent to global GHG emissions. The devastating floods of 2022 and 2025 highlighted the country’s acute exposure to climate extremes, displacing millions and worsening poverty. In this context, at COP30, Pakistan called for survival, climate justice, and fair global support for developing countries.
Nuclear energy could play a key role in mitigating climate change in Pakistan, who’s energy deficit has been a longstanding problem. With a population of over 250 million, Pakistan struggles to meet growing energy demand. Nuclear power offers a reliable and independent energy source. In contrast to fossil fuels, nuclear power does not rely on imports and offers Pakistan a level of energy independence that is vital for national security. While speaking at the 69th IAEA General Conference in Vienna on 15 September 2025, Chairman of the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC), Mr Ali Raza Anwar, reaffirmed Pakistan’s commitment to the peaceful use of nuclear technology for sustainable development and international cooperation. He highlighted that Pakistan’s six nuclear power plants contribute 18.3% to the national energy mix and also help avoid nearly 15 million tonnes of Carbon Dioxide (CO2)emissions each year.
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, during his official visit to Vienna on 17 February 2026, reaffirmed Pakistan’s support for the IAEA in the promotion of safe and responsible use of nuclear technology in areas such as agriculture, industrial applications, nuclear power generation, and cancer diagnosis and treatment.
Investing in nuclear power could bring multiple economic benefits. Construction of NPPs in line with Pakistan Vision 2050 to produce 42,000 MWe nuclear power would create jobs, vitalize technological development, and produce a skilled workforce. Additionally, nuclear power would also offer long-term price stability, which is especially important in the light of the unpredictable fluctuations in international oil and gas prices for geopolitical reasons.
Hafsa Azam
Hafsa Azam is a Research Officer at the Center for International Strategic Studies Sindh. She holds a Bachelor’s degree in Environmental Sciences from Bahria University, Karachi. Her areas of interest include climate change, climate mitigation and adaptation, environmental impact assessment, environmental policies and laws, environmental hazards and management, occupational health and safety, Sustainable Development Goals, energy and artificial intelligence.
OUTLAW PALM OIL
Indonesia firms in palm oil fraud probe supplied fuel majors
Indonesian companies targeted in a palm oil fraud probe supplied European firms including Italian energy giant Eni and Finnish sustainable aviation fuel leader Neste, an investigation by AFP and SourceMaterial has found.
The links raise fresh questions about supply chains in the biofuel sector, experts said, and follow persistent allegations of fraud involving palm oil products used as fuel feedstocks.
There is no suggestion that Eni, Neste or other companies supplied by Indonesian firms implicated in the probe had knowledge of or involvement in fraud.
The Indonesian probe alleges local companies and government officials conspired to pass off palm oil as a waste byproduct called palm oil mill effluent (POME), including by offering bribes.
For the Indonesian government, this is a financial issue — the higher tax on palm oil means labelling the product as POME allegedly defrauded authorities of millions of dollars in revenue.
For customers, the allegations threaten sustainability pledges. Palm oil has long been associated with deforestation, and both Eni and Neste have officially removed it from their supply chains.
The European Union will ban its use in biofuel from 2030.
Both Eni and Neste received multiple shipments described as POME from Indonesian companies accused of mislabelling palm oil as the waste byproduct.
Experts and campaigners said the alleged fraud illustrated the sector’s oversight problems.
“The EU rightly decided to phase out palm oil biofuels in 2019 because of its links to deforestation,” said Cian Delaney, biofuels campaigner at environmental NGO Transport and Environment (T&E).
“But disguising palm oil as waste products like POME… has been far too easy for suppliers and traders. Verification and certification of these imports is clearly failing,” Delaney said.
– Persistent fraud claims –
Eni said it had no direct contracts with accused companies and received shipments through an accredited supplier who “immediately suspended all operations with the companies involved in the investigation”.
The supplier, Enviq, did not respond to requests for comment.
Neste also said it had instructed its supplier to exclude implicated companies from its supply chain after the Indonesian investigation was announced.
It said analysis of periodic samples from shipments between 2023 and 2025 were “consistent with palm-derived waste”, not palm oil.
Indonesia has long suspected POME fraud and last year temporarily limited exports after trade data recorded volumes far exceeding estimated available supply.
Then last month, Indonesian authorities arrested 11 people, including customs officials, accused of defrauding the government between 2022 and 2024 by labelling palm oil as POME.
The attorney general’s office (AGO) gave only the initials of those arrested and their firms.
AFP and SourceMaterial used trade data, including some supplied by T&E, shareholder agreements, and customs documents obtained through freedom of information requests to ascertain the identities of three of those arrested.
A source in the AGO confirmed the findings.
Among them is “TNY”, a shareholder in Green Product International, and director of a company identified only as TEO.
This refers to Tony, who like many Indonesians uses a single name. Tony is director of Tanimas Edible Oils and a shareholder in Green Product International.
Green Product International was the source of multiple shipments of a product labelled as POME to Eni and Neste between 2023 and 2024.
There is no conclusive evidence as to what those shipments contained.
Green Product International did not respond to a request for comment.
AFP and SourceMaterial identified two other companies implicated in the probe, Surya Inti Primakarya, whose director, Van Ricardo, was arrested, and Bumi Mulia Makmur, whose director, Erwin, was arrested.
Both signed off on shipments to Eni between 2022 and 2024.
Calls and messages to both companies seeking comment were not answered.
All three men remain in custody, the AGO said.
– ‘Independent scrutiny’ –
Eni said the company that handled its shipments was certified by International Sustainability and Carbon Certification (ISCC), an EU-certified verifier of the bloc’s palm oil product imports.
An ISCC spokesperson said Surya Inti Primakarya is “currently excluded from recertification” and Bumi Mulia Makmur was “previously excluded”.
But Green Product International still holds a valid certificate, the ISCC’s online registry shows. The spokesperson did not respond when asked whether that accreditation would be reexamined.
Other companies Green Product International supplied indirectly include Swiss trader Kolmar, which declined to provide an on-record statement, as well as Spanish oil major Repsol and American multinational Cargill, neither of which replied to requests for comment.
Allegations of fraud in the POME sector have circulated for years, given high demand for use as a sustainable fuel feedstock, and the higher taxes sometimes levied on palm oil.
Some analyses have suggested the amount of POME being used in the EU and Britain exceeds available global supply, suggesting widespread mislabelling, though some industry groups have disputed those calcuations.
Ireland has ended incentives for POME’s use in biofuels, and Germany will follow suit next year.
James Cogan, head of public policy at ClonBio, an Irish biofuel maker that only sources from the EU, said verification is so problematic that buyers and regulators should be suspicious of any shipment marked as POME.
“I would challenge any POME or POME-based biofuels processor to publish their volumes, sources and paperwork, to allow public and independent scrutiny,” he said.
Schrödinger’s Pipeline: Why The Ukraine-Hungary Standoff Is No Quantum Mystery – Analysis
(EurActiv) — Quantum mechanics, popular science books often assure us, implies that a cat trapped inside a closed box can be simultaneously dead and alive. At best, this is half-true: a process known as decoherence means that large physical objects – including Erwin Schrödinger’s unfortunate kitty – are astronomically unlikely to exhibit any quantum weirdness.
The current dispute between Kyiv and Budapest over the Druzhba oil pipeline, a Soviet-era conduit that transports Russian crude to Hungary via Ukraine, occasionally feels just as confused – and confusing – as pseudoscientific explanations of modern physics.
On the other hand, Kyiv argues that the pipeline was damaged by a Russian attack in late January. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy also claimed this week that his engineers are “undertaking all possible efforts” to repair it: a process he said will last until late April or early May.
So, who’s right?
We don’t know for certain. This is because Ukraine has refused for weeks to allow EU officials to assess the alleged damage. Even though EU inspectors finally arrived in Ukraine this week, it remains unclear whether they’ll actually be allowed to visit the pipeline.
Ukraine’s blocking of EU inspections – combined with Zelenskyy’s explicit reluctance to fix the pipeline and the fact that the alleged repairs will only conclude after the Hungarian elections – suggest that Orbán probably has a point. You don’t need to open the box to know the cat’s dead, especially if something smells putrid.
This view is privately conceded by many European officials. One EU diplomat noted that Kyiv’s refusal to permit inspections has been “anything but reassuring”, even if the Ukrainians “give good explanations” about why the pipeline is difficult to repair.
“If I am very, very honest, I went back and forth several times” about whether Orbán is right, the diplomat said.
In other words, the pipeline might not be in a superposition. But EU officials’ views of it are. Hungary for trouble
None of this, of course, is to defend Orbán’s decision to veto the €90 billion loan he previously agreed to, which has – understandably – enraged European and Ukrainian officials.
Nor is it even to criticise Zelenskyy’s reluctance to repair the pipeline. On the contrary, there’s arguably something morally perverse about demanding that the leader of a war-torn country help sell the oil produced by the very nation that is attacking it.
Putting ethical assessments to one side, however, Ukraine’s behaviour also raises an economicpuzzle.
As we’ve previously reported, Ukraine is set to run out of money in late April. So if Kyiv is attempting to influence Hungary’s 12 April election – and Zelenskyy has also strongly hinted that this is indeed his goal – why is Ukraine not more worried about its financial predicament? Shouldn’t fears of an imminent financial collapse cause Kyiv to panic, or capitulate?
The obvious explanation – that Ukraine is pinning its hopes on Magyar unblocking the loan on 13 April – doesn’t hold water.
Even if Orbán loses (and recent polls suggest that he might), there is no guarantee that an opposition government will quickly be formed. Orbán himself took seven weeks to form the current government despite winning a landslide victory in 2022.
A potentially more plausible reason is that, regardless of who wins, Ukraine will be able to restart oil deliveries almost immediately after the election. Unfortunately, there’s no cast-iron guarantee that Orbán will unblock the loan post-election even if the crude begins to flow. Nor is there any certainty that Magyar would do the same, despite EU officials’ hopes that he will. Dismal science fiction
The most important reason, though, is that – much like a simultaneously dead-and-alive cat – the notion of a suddenly cash-strapped Ukraine bears little resemblance to actual reality. Rather, it is one borne of popular-science-style journalism – including, I’m afraid to say, my own.
As analysts at the Kyiv School of Economics Institute point out, the emergence of a fiscal “pressure point” by sometime around late April is “broadly plausible”. However, the specific ways in which this pressure would manifest itself “would depend on the timing of inflows, domestic borrowing conditions, and the government’s ability to manage expenditures”.
Crucially, the analysts note that Ukraine is “unlikely” to default on its debt to foreign creditors even if the €90 billion loan fails to arrive in a timely manner. This, they explained, is because Ukraine is mostly externally indebted through economically favourable, long-maturity loans that are “fully manageable even amid significant financing shortfalls”.
In the event of a severe financing shortfall, Ukraine would likely issue more domestic debt to stay afloat, they added.
Their assessment was broadly shared by Maksym Samoiliuk, an economist at the Centre for Economic Strategy, a Kyiv-based think tank. Cuts to military expenditure are “out of the question” and the “political and practical costs” of slashing social spending are likely “too high”, he said. But Ukraine could issue bonds to state-owned banks to remain afloat, he added.
Samoiliuk also noted that, in a worst-case scenario, Ukraine’s central bank could simply print money as it did following Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022 – which would likely cause inflation to soar but would, technically, cover any potential funding shortfalls.
“The key point is that Ukraine is not facing an immediate fiscal cliff today, but the margin for manoeuvre would narrow rapidly without fresh disbursements,” the Kyiv School analysts told me. “The longer the delay, the more difficult and costly the adjustment would become.”
In other words: Ukraine has significant funding needs, but it doesn’t face any immediate fiscal crunch. Its financial predicament is urgent – but not critical.
Much like with quantum theory, Ukraine’s political and financial predicament is arguably stranger than fiction. And, crucially, there’s nothing decoherent about it.
Belarus frees another 250 political prisoners as US eases sanctions
In the biggest swap to date, Belarus has released another 250 political prisoners as Lukashenko contnues to trade opposition protestors for sanctions relief. / bne IntelliNews
Belarus has released another 250 political prisoners, the largest single release to date, after cutting a new sanctions relief deal with the US, Associated Press reported on March 19.
President Alexander Lukashenko ordered the pardons after meeting US President Donald Trump’s special envoy for Belarus, John Coale, in Minsk, in what officials described as a step towards improving relations between the long-isolated state and the West.
Coale described the move as a “significant humanitarian milestone” and a testament to Trump’s “commitment to direct, hard-nosed diplomacy”.
He said Washington would lift sanctions on two Belarusian state banks and the country’s finance ministry, while also removing leading potash producers from a sanctions list.
Lukashenko has been trading prisoners for sanction relief that is also bolstering his position with the Kremlin as he tries to play the White House off against the Kremlin. Since supporting Russia’s invasion of Ukraine by allowing Russian forces to launch an attack on Kyiv from Belarusian soil, Minsk has been hit by a string of harsh sanctions. Belarus is currently the sixth most sanctioned country in the world, after Russia which is the fifth.
Most of the most prominent opposition leaders have now been released after spending five years in jail, including Sergey Tikhanovsky (Siarhei Tsikhanouskiy), the husband of Belarusian opposition leader Svetlana Tikhanovskaya (Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya) who contested the 2020 presidential elections in his stead after he was arrested before the poll.
Tikhanovsky's dramatic release follows a trip to Minsk by US Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff to broker a pardon for the popular blogger who challenged Lukashenko in the flawed 2020 presidential elections that ended in the largest mass protests the country has ever seen.
In exchange, the US has eased sanctions on the national carrier, Belavia and Belarus’ cash cow, the potash mine, Belaruskali.
Tikhanovskaya welcomed the recent release, calling it “a moment of great relief and hope”.
“After years of isolation, people are now free and can finally embrace their loved ones,” she told Associated Press. “There is nothing more powerful than seeing someone who endured unjust imprisonment reunited with their family.” She added that US efforts “are saving lives”.
The release follows a similar exchange in December, when the easing of sanctions on Belarus’s potash sector coincided with the freeing of 123 political prisoners. Minsk has increasingly used such gestures to recalibrate ties with Western governments while maintaining its close alliance with Russia.
Belarus, a country of 9.5mn people, has faced years of sanctions over its domestic crackdown and its support for Moscow’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Lukashenko has ruled for more than three decades, and his hold on power was challenged by mass protests following the disputed 2020 presidential election.
Amongst the other prominent figures freed have been Maria Kolesnikova who campaigned with Tikhanovskaya in the 2020 presidential campaign, and Viktor Barbaryko, who was widely expected to win the elections until he was jailed by Lukashenko. Human rights activists Valiantsin Stefanovich and Marfa Rabkova, activist Nasta Loika, journalist Katsiaryna Bakhvalava and opposition blogger Eduard Palchys have all also been released. However, despite these releases, around 1,000 political prisoners remain in jail.
Despite the releases, rights groups say repression remains widespread. Tikhanovskaya said “many people are still behind bars” and that “our goal remains unchanged - to free them all and to put a final end to repression, so that every Belarusian can live freely in their own country.”
Some detainees were transferred to Lithuania without identity documents. Dzianis Kuchynski, an adviser to Tikhanovskaya, described this as a “mockery” intended to complicate their lives abroad.
Kazakhstan no longer paying even lip service to democracy, say analysts
In Kazakhstani politics, authorities are said to have repeatedly used the element of surprise to paralyse political opponents. The referendum suddenly called by Tokayev (pictured) is one such example. / Akorda.kz
Much of the commentary on Kazakhstan’s adoption of a new constitution in a referendum last week is nothing short of scathing.
Serik Beysembaev, writing for Carnegie, concludes that if the observer “peels away the rhetoric”, they should see the document as “an embodiment of the ruling elite’s fears and a self-serving attempt to preserve the status quo while they still can”, adding: “The need for [President Kassym-Jomart] Tokayev’s regime to pay lip service to democracy disappeared with Donald Trump’s return to the White House.”
Peter Leonard, in a piece posted on his Havli blog on Central Asia, posits: “The new constitution promises a strong president, an influential parliament, and an accountable government. The first of those three is the only one the small print supports.”
And political scientist Dosym Satpayev, interviewed by Azattyk, describes how “we are currently seeing the existence of unstable political institutions in our country being further extended, with such institutions, unfortunately, not fully formed in Kazakhstan.
“And the new constitution does not create a new model of political development, because in its model, the main decision-making centre remains the president, and he acts without a strong parliament, an independent judiciary or other balancing mechanisms. This, of course… further increases the risk of discord and conflict in a closed background environment.”
Many analysts remain taken aback at how Tokayev suddenly permitted himself to sprint for the line by announcing a mid-March vote on an entirely new foundational law, having not long before suggested the proposal would be to amend around 40 constitutional articles, possibly by some time in 2027 (seePANNIER: Tokayev’s sprint for constitutional referendum perplexes Kazakhstan, published by bne IntelliNews on March 12).
Beysembaev, a sociologist who is director of Paperlab Research Center in Astana, Kazakhstan, says the “authorities have not provided a clear explanation for why” the change of course was necessary and allowed.
He reflects: “There are competing theories: maybe Tokayev intends to run for UN Secretary-General and wants a transition mechanism quick, or maybe the presidential administration is pushing through constitutional changes while Kazakhstan’s socioeconomic climate remains relatively favorable.
“Meanwhile, the Constitutional Commission attributes the haste to geopolitical turbulence and growing external threats, clearly alluding to Russia’s unpredictability.
“It is difficult to say which of these explanations is correct. In any case, rapid reforms are nothing new for Kazakhstani politics, where the authorities have repeatedly used the element of surprise to paralyze political opponents.”
Looking at the run-up to the March 15 vote, Leonard says: “There was no debate, no conversation even. Sceptics have been harassed or jailed into submission.”
“Legislation of this kind, he adds, “is not typically written by governments that are confident of their popularity. It is instead the work of governments that understand, even if they will not say so, that independent voices, when they exist, tend to say inconvenient things.”
Under the new constitution, the parliament will be reduced from two chambers to one and renamed the Kurultai, a “folksy name meant to evoke the great councils of the Turkic steppe where chieftains gathered to choose their leaders,” according to Leonard.
Unimpressed with what seems to be in store, he adds: “There is nothing yet to suggest that the Kurultai will be any less supine than its catspaw two-chamber antecedent. Genuinely oppositional parties are shut out of the system. The next parliament will, if anything, serve as an even smoother conveyor belt for presidential diktats.”
Looking at the upcoming establishment of a vice-president role, Beysembaev says the post could be used to test potential successors to Tokayev, who turns 73 in May, but suggests: “However, a simpler scenario remains on the table: extending Tokayev’s term. The adoption of a new constitution could provide a legal basis. Tokayev’s inner circle publicly rejects this possibility, but such assurances carry little weight in Kazakhstani politics. [First president of post-Soviet Kazakhstan Nursultan] Nazarbayev, for example, mentioned a transition repeatedly, but ultimately carried it out on his own terms and at his own leisure.
“At the same time, the reform also affects the future of those currently in power. Tokayev’s inner circle views the constitutional changes as an opportunity to secure their positions for the post-Tokayev era. The emergent power structure, in which the president and his appointees control the courts, law enforcement agencies, and electoral process, provides Tokayev’s circle with far more reliable guarantees than any informal agreement.
“These maneuvers attest to Tokayev’s personal evolution as a politician. Before coming to power, he was primarily a diplomat and technocrat. However, over the years of his presidency, Tokayev has developed his own vision of the state: it should be the chief arbiter of public life and prioritize stability over freedom. The new constitution cements this vision as part of Kazakhstan’s official ideology and a super-presidential system as President Tokayev’s political legacy.”
Satpayev, speaking to Azattyk, talks of how referendum day produced more scenes showing how the government, with no genuine democracy in play, often perceives the people “as just a crowd, spectators in play”.
Officials, he says, “are constantly trying to create an image of the president as an artificial superman, a peerless person”.
Yet, in the eyes of Beysembaev, the public certainly do not buy it. “The public,” he says, “reacted to the constitutional changes far more negatively than the presidential administration had likely anticipated. Predictably, the authorities are cracking down—in particular, by arresting activists and social media users who opposed the amendments and called for a boycott of the vote. Following the traumatic experience of [the ‘Bloody January’ unrest of] 2022, the regime prefers to extinguish potential hotbeds of discontent before they find the right kindling.”
Ahmed Aman says some detainees "had their fingernails ripped out with pliers" © - / AFP
